The ankylos endosseous dental implant: assessment of stability up to 18 months with the Periotest

Osseointegration is an ongoing histometric process that may vary during clinical function. The implant must be stable at uncovering, which reflects the status of bone-implant interface. The physiology of bone healing associated with endosseous implants suggests that this process occurs between 8 and 12 months, and Periotest values (PTVs) tend to reflect changes in the stability of the bone-implant interface. Stability generally increases gradually from the time of uncovering to an optimal PTV that occurs at a point close to 12 months. This stable interface must remain intact for long-term clinical survival. Rapid development of this optimal PTV is highly desirable in order to prevent premature overloading of the bone-implant interface. The Ankylos implant is a new screw-type implant design in which the thread pitch and length vary to maximize trabecular bone contact. The purpose of this report is to evaluate to 18 months the stability (PTVs) of this implant design. More than 457 implants were placed and followed for a period of 18 months by the multicentered, multidisciplinary Ankylos Implant Clinical Research Group (AICRG). Implant stability (PTVs) was assessed using the Periotest at abutment connection and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after uncovering. The Periotest values for all implants rapidly reached an optimal status between uncovering (-3.1 PTVs) and 3 months (-3.4 PTVs). This rapid increase in stability has not previously been reported for other implant designs. The mandibular arch was more negative (-3.8 PTVs) at uncovering as compared with the PTVs for the maxillary arch (-1.7 PTVs). Negative PTVs were recorded (1) as length and diameter increased, (2) as bone density increased, (3) in certain jaw regions, (4) as the number of implants/case increased, and (5) for implants stabile at placement. The Ankylos screw implant design produced rapid stabilization 3 months after uncovering.     

Present status of immediate loading of oral implants

PROBLEM: Several conditions must be present to obtain implant integration and long-term clinical success when using the one-stage implant placement procedure with immediate loading. These conditions include (1) primary stability, (2) sufficient bone quality, and (3) elimination of micromovement of the implant before osseous integration is complete. PURPOSE: This report presents the results of research on immediate loading using a new and innovative implant design, Ankylos. METHODS: The author reviewed clinical studies of immediate loaading or oral implants, including two treatment options, removable overdentures and fixed reconstructions. RESULTS: Animal studies have demonstrated that successful osseointegration of Ankylos implants can occur (Figure 2D) when implants are placed and loaded immediately in the presence of some specific conditions. The histological findings involving implants that were placed in humans and immediately loaded showed no fibrous tissue formation (encapsulation). The bone-to-implant contact (osseointegration) was found to be excellent between the immediately-loaded implants and the surrounding alveolar bone. CONCLUSION: The Ankylos implant system with its progressive thread design successfully promotes primary, clinical stability at the time of implant placement. Several animal studies have shown that in implant restorations placed in similar areas of poor bone quality (ie, maxilla and the posterior part of the mandible), the concept of immediate loading can result in long-term clinical success, when loading forces are controlled. Immobilization of the implants and soft diet recommendations that reduce micromovement at the bone-to-implant interface will improve long-term clinical success. In summary, the Ankylos implant is well designed for one-stage placement with immediate loading, as well as for two-stage treatment protocols. Both clinical protocols will result in long-term clinical survival.     

A new implant designed to maximize contact with trabecular bone: survival to 18 months

PROBLEM: A roughened, commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti) implant design has been developed that features a different length and pitch for each screw thread to direct functional stresses away from cortical bone and to the more resilient trabecular bone. Abutment-implant connection is made using a conical taper to provide a seal against invasion by microorganisms. PURPOSE: To assess short-term (18 months) clinical performance of this innovative implant design. METHODS: A total of 1,419 implants were placed in 313 patients to support 419 prostheses in a multidisciplinary, multicentered, prospective clinical study conducted by the Ankylos Implant Clinical Research Group (AICRG). More than 100 dentists at 32 centers in the United States, 1 in Korea, and 1 in Taiwan are involved in the study. Failure was defined as implant removal for any reason. The influence of mobility at placement, implant length and diameter, incision type, augmentation, crestal bone reduction, bone density, and the use of the operating room or dental clinic on survival were evaluated over 18 months. Crestal bone loss between placement and uncovering was also determined. RESULTS: Crestal bone loss ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 mm. The overall success rate from placement to 18 months was 96.6%. Implants mobile at placement failed more frequently (16.9%) compared with stable implants (3.1%). Wide-diameter implants and longer implants exhibited higher survival rates. Incision design and surgery location did not influence survival. Bone density was important to clinical survival.     

Ankylos种植系统在上颌窦外提升术同期牙种植中的应用

目的:对Ankylos种植系统在上颌窦提升术同期牙种植中的临床效果进行评价。方法:收集2008年1月至2010年1月期间,对46例上颌后牙区牙齿缺失要求种植的患者,于58侧上颌窦行外提升术,同期植入Ankylos种植体142枚,修复后随访观察1～3年。结果:观察期内142颗种植体,均无松动或脱落,曲面断层片检查种植体周围未见明显骨吸收阴影。结论:Ankylos种植系统应用于上颌窦提升术同期牙种植可获得满意的临床效果。     

Effect of early exposure on the integration of dental implants: Part 2--Clinical findings at 6 months postloading

Implant exposure during initial healing after placement has been considered important in both implant integration and postloading effects. This study evaluated the effect of early implant exposure on the clinical findings prerestoration and 6 months postrestoration. Forty-eight implants (24 CPTi and 24 Ti-13-13) were placed in maxillary and mandibular posterior sites in six baboons. Implant exposure was evaluated for 24 of the submerged implants at placement and at each weekly visit for 3 weeks after implant placement. The crestal bone level at maxillary posterior sites was measured at 6-month uncovering, and mandibular sites were measured at 3-month uncovering. All sites were again measured 6 months after restoration placement. Periotest readings were recorded at implant uncovering and again 6 months postloading. Arbitrary groupings of the Periotest values were assigned as good = -7 to -1; guarded = 0 to +2; and poor = +3 to +27. At 6 months postloading, there were no statistical differences between CPTi and Ti-13-13 for change in crestal bone height in either arch. The mean change in maxillary crestal bone height varied from a 0.59- to 1.35-mm loss. The differences between the mean exposed and nonexposed changes were not statistically significant The mean change in mandibular crestal bone height varied from a 0.25- to 0.88-mm loss. Changes in crestal bone height for nonexposed sites from 3-month implant uncovering to 6 months postloading were statistically significant at the mesial, buccal, and lingual aspects. The mean change for the nonexposed distal aspect approached significance. The differences between the mean exposed and nonexposed changes were not statistically significant. The overall percentage of maxillary implants in the good category for nonexposed sites decreased by 41% from uncovering to 6 months after loading, while no change occurred for exposed sites; the percentage of implants in the good category was comparable for early exposed and nonexposed sites (57% and 59%, respectively). At 6 months after loading, the percentage of implants in the good category was more favorable for early exposed (88%) than nonexposed sites (50%). A one-stage implant approach should provide similar postloading clinical results as the two-stage surgical approach.     

Clinical Outcomes of an Osteotome Technique and Simultaneous Placement of Neoss Implants in the Posterior Maxilla

Background: Insufficient bone volume often hamper placement of dental implants in the posterior maxilla. Purpose: The aim of the present clinical study was to evaluate retrospectively the clinical outcome of implant placement in the resorbed posterior maxilla using an osteotome technique without adding any grafting material. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with 5 to 9 mm of residual alveolar bone height in the posterior maxilla received twenty‐nine implants (Neoss Ltd., Harrogate, UK) using an osteotomy technique without bone grafts. Intraoral radiographs were taken before and after implant placement, at the time of loading and after 11 to 32 months of loading (mean 16.4 months), to evaluate bone formation below the sinus membrane and marginal bone loss. Implant stability measurements (Osstell^TM, Gothenburg, Sweden) were performed after implant installation and at abutment connection 5 months later. All implants were installed with the prosthetic platform level with the bone crest. Results: No implant was lost giving a survival rate of 100% after a mean follow‐up time of 16.4 months. The average vertical bone height was 7.2 ± 1.5 mm at placement and 10.0 ± 1.0 mm after 11 to 32 months. The average increase of 2.8 ± 1.1 mm was statistically significant. There was a statistically significant improvement in implant stability from 70.7 ± 9.2 implant stability quotient (ISQ) at placement to 76.7 ± 5.7 ISQ at abutment connection, 5 months later. The mean marginal bone loss amounted to 0.7 ± 0.3 mm after 11 to 32 months of loading. Conclusion: It is concluded that the osteotome technique evaluated resulted in predictable intrasinus bone formation, firm implant stability, and good clinical outcomes as no implants were lost and minimal marginal bone loss was observed.     

A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival

This report is based on a total of 2,955 implants of 6 different designs, randomized and placed in 829 patients and followed for 48 months. Implant failure was defined as nonintegration at uncovering or removal due to mobility, persistent pain, infection, and evidence of radiographic bone loss. Failures were reported for 3 phases of treatment: implant placement to uncovering (phase 1), uncovering to loading (phase 2), and postloading (phase 3). Differences in survival were compared with Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The maxillary single tooth application resulted in 95.2% survival for the hydroxyapatite-coated grooved implants. In the maxillary completely edentulous application, survival of hydroxyapatite grooved and screw implants were considerably better compared with the titanium screw implants. The hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder had better survival than the titanium basket and screw designs in the mandibular completely edentulous application. The hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder and grooved implants in the maxillary posterior partially edentulous application had similar survival rates. The survival of the hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder exceeded that of the titanium basket in mandibular posterior partially edentulous applications. Analyses by phase of treatment indicated a pattern of early failure for nonhydroxyapatite-coated implants compared with hydroxyapatite-coated implants. The implant with the highest survival at all phases of treatment was the hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cylinder. Two hydroxyapatite-coated implant designs performed well in the challenging posterior maxillary region.     

Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a clinical study including bone density, insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis data

Background: The primary stability of dental implants associated with resistance to micromotion during healing is affected by surgical technique and implant design, which are important especially in the soft bone, where implant failures are more likely. Purposes: This study was designed to compare the parameters associated with implant insertion using two different methods of enhancing implant primary stability and to identify any relationship between these parameters at implant insertion. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 implants were placed in the maxillary posterior regions of 22 patients. The bone densities at the implant sites were recorded using a computerized tomography machine in Hounsfield unit (HU). The maximum insertion torque data were recorded with the Osseocare™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) equipment, while resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were taken using an Osstell™ (Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden) machine at implant surgery. Comparisons including HU, Ncm, and implant stability quotient were made between two control groups (C1 and C2), and corresponding four test groups (T1–T4) using thinner drills to enhance primary implant stability. Results: Two implants were lost, meaning an overall implant survival rate of 96.6% after 3 ± 1 years. When compared to control groups, significantly higher mean maximum insertion torque and RFA values were found for corresponding test groups. In addition, strong correlations were observed between the bone density and insertion torque, and implant stability values at implant placement. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that using thinner drills for implant placement in the maxillary posterior region where bone quality is poor may improve the primary implant stability, which helps clinicians to obtain higher implant survival rates.     

Immediate Occlusal Loading of NanoTite™ Tapered Implants: A Prospective 1‐Year Clinical and Radiographic Study

Background: During the last decade, high success rates have been reported for implants placed with immediate loading procedures, especially when bone quality and quantity provide good implant stability. In many of these studies, straight‐walled implants with moderately rough surfaces were employed. Tapered implants are becoming increasingly more popular due to standardized drilling protocols and reports of high initial primary stability. Purpose: The aim of the present prospective, single center clinical study was to evaluate surface topographical analysis and the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the NanoTite? (BIOMET 3i, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA) Tapered Implant when used for immediate loading of fixed prostheses and single‐tooth restorations. Materials and Methods: Forty‐two patients who needed implant treatment and met admission criteria agreed to participate in the study and were consecutively enrolled. Surgical implant placement requirements consisted of a final torque of a least 30 Ncm prior to final seating and an implant stability quotient above 55. A total of 139 NanoTite Tapered implants (112 maxillary and 27 mandibular) were placed by one investigator, and the majority of these implants (n = 77/55%) were placed in posterior regions, and in soft bone (n = 90/65%). A total of 57 prosthetic constructions were evaluated consisting of 20 single‐tooth restorations, 30 fixed partial dentures, and 7 complete, fixed maxillary restorations. Radiographs were taken at baseline and at 12 months of follow‐up. Results: Of the 139 study implants, one implant failure was declared. The overall cumulative survival rate at 1 year is 99.4%. Mean marginal bone resorption is 1.01 mm (SD 0.85) during the first year of function. Conclusion: Although limited to the short follow‐up, immediate loading of NanoTite Tapered implants seems to be a viable option in implant rehabilitation, when insertion torque of at least 30 Ncm is achieved. Further studies are needed to authenticate the finding of this study.     

Stability measurements of osseointegrated implants using Osstell in partially edentulous jaws after 1 year of loading: a pilot study

Background: The introduction of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) as a commercially available technique has made it possible to measure implant stability in implant stability quotient (ISQ) units at any time during the course of implant treatment and loading. However, no information on normal ISQ levels can be found in the literature. Purpose: The aim of this pilot study was to measure the stability of clinically successful implants in partially edentulous patients after 1 year of loading and to study the influence of jaw, anterior/posterior position, implant length, and marginal bone level on implant stability. Materials and Methods: Fourteen partially edentulous patients previously treated with 45 implants were subjected to clinical and radiographie evaluations and RFA measurements using Osstell (Integration Diagnostics, Sävedalen, Sweden) after 1 year of loading. Results: All 45 implants were stable, and implant stability levels were in the range of 57 to 82 ISQ units with a mean of 69 ± 6.5 ISQ after 1 year of loading. Mandibular implants were more stable than were maxillary ones. There were no differences between anterior and posterior implants. No correlation could be found between implant length and stability. Only minor marginal bone resorption was observed. Conclusions: The results from this limited material showed that successfully integrated implants have ISQ levels from 57 to 82 ISQ with a mean of 69 ISQ after 1 year of loading. Mandibular implants are more stable than are maxillary ones. High implant stability can be achieved with short implants and placement in posterior regions.     

Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study

Background: A number of different dental implant designs are currently in clinical use. A successful outcome of implant placement is thought, at least in part, to be due to the primary stability of an implant after placement. Few data are available for comparing the primary stability characteristics of different implant designs. Purpose: This investigation compared the primary stability of five types of endosseous dental implant of varying geometry and surface topography. Materials and Methods: Comparison was made between a standard threaded commercially pure titanium implant (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden), the Mark II self‐tapping implant (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden), the Mark IV tapered self‐tapping implant (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden), the Astra Tioblast (AstraTech AB, Mölndahl, Sweden), and the 3i Osseotite (3I [Implant Innovations Incorporated], Palm Beach, Florida, USA). Fifty‐two fixtures were placed in the maxillary bone of nine unembalmed human cadavers. Implant stability as a function of peak insertion torque and resonance frequency values was recorded for each fixture site after placement. Removal torque was also measured 1‐hour postinsertion. Assessment of bone quality at each site was made. Results: All of the implants tested demonstrated good primary stability in type 2 and 3 bone. The Standard, Mark II, Osseotite, and Tioblast were less stable when placed into bone type 4. The Mark IV implants appeared to maintain a high primary stability even in Type 4 bone. Conclusion: When looking across all bone qualities, the Mark IV implant develops a significantly higher insertion torque than the Standard, Mark II, and Osseotite implant types, and a significantly higher resonance frequency value than the Standard implant, indicating a higher interfacial stiffness at the implant–bone interface.     

Resonance frequency analysis of stability on ITI implants with osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without grafting: a 5-month prospective study

Objective: The aim of the present study was to (1) monitor the stability changes of ITI implants placed in atrophic posterior maxillary ridges with osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) without grafting during the first 5 months of healing utilizing resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and (2) determine the factors that affect the implant stability quotient (ISQ) at placement and healings. Material and methods: Forty‐two ITI implants were placed in the posterior maxilla in 32 patients with OSFE without bone grafting. The residual vertical bone height ranged from 4 to 8 mm (average 6.36 mm). Bone type was classified into one to four groups according to the Lekholm and Zarb index. ISQ was tested on the day of surgery and consecutively at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks by RFA. Results: The 40 osseointegrated implants represented a survival rate of 95.2%. All the 40 implants achieved good primary stability and reached a comparably high stability at 16 weeks postoperation with a dip between 2 and 6 weeks in the stability curve. There was no significant difference of ISQ between type3 and type4 bone at implant placement and follow‐up. The mean ISQ and its changing pattern did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference according to the pretreatment vertical bone height and implant length. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicated that uneventful osseointegration may be predictable applying OSFE alone with no grafting in atrophic posterior maxilla. Residual bone height (RBH), implant length, and bone type did not seem to affect the implant stability in this clinical situation.     

A resonance frequency analysis assessment of maxillary and mandibular immediately loaded implants

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the stability of implants in 51 patients following a clinical protocol of immediate functional loading. The stability during the first 3 months following implant placement was assessed according to bone type, implant location, and patient gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two male and 29 female patients were treated with 344 Br?nemark System implants placed in edentulous bone or extraction sites and put into functional loading using the Teeth in a Day protocol. Each implant was tested for primary stability with resonance frequency analysis (RFA) at the time of implant placement, and RFA was performed at examinations 30, 60, and 90 days following surgery. RESULTS: The analysis was based on the 276 implants that were successfully measured using RFA at all postoperative intervals. The clinical implant survival rate was 98.5% for the total population. RFA showed a decrease in bone-implant stability in the first month after implant placement from 70.35 +/- 0.5 to 66.38 +/- 0.50, followed by increases in stability in the second and third months (68.01 +/- 0.50 and 68.82 +/- 0.49, respectively), suggesting a process of adaptive bone remodeling around the implant. In general, lower initial stabilities were seen in softer bone types, in the posterior portions of the jaw compared to anterior areas, and in the female population. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest an immediate loading protocol should have an undisturbed period of healing for the first 2 months following implant placement. The determination of "predictor" stability levels for different clinical conditions were based on multiple splinted implants, allowing a larger surface area to withstand the distribution of the load. The most significant "predictor" values from a surgical and prosthodontic perspective are those determined in soft bone, in reduced bone, or in areas where lever arms are created as a result of long spans between the implants.     

A relaxed implant bed: implants placed after two weeks of osteotomy with immediate loading: a one year clinical trial

A waiting period of 2?weeks after osteotomy increases the surrounding tissue activity to its maximum level as collagen formation and neoangiogenesis represent a relaxed and acceptable implant bed configuration. The aim of the present study was a clinical and radiologic evaluation of early osteotomy with implant placement delayed for 2?weeks with immediate loading in the anterior and premolar region with minimally invasive approach. Seven GS II implants (Osstem) were placed in 6 patients. Osteotomy was done followed by flap closure without placement of the implant. After waiting for approximately 2?weeks, implant placement was done, which was loaded immediately with provisional crown in implant protected occlusion. It was replaced by definitive restoration after 6-8?weeks, which was considered baseline. Implant stability and marginal bone levels were assessed with clinical and radiologic parameters at baseline, 6- and 12-month intervals. None of the implants were found mobile during the 1-year period. The average mean marginal bone loss was 0.4?mm over the 1-year follow-up period. In the present study, early osteotomy with delayed implant placement showed negligible crestal bone loss with no mobility.     

A collagenated porcine bone substitute for augmentation at Neoss implant sites: a prospective 1-year multicenter case series study with histology

Background: The presence of localized defects and/or small amounts of bone below the maxillary sinus is a common finding, which may compromise implant placement. There is therefore a need for predictable techniques for bone augmentation in such situations. Purpose: The study aims to clinically and histologically evaluate a porcine bone (PB) substitute used for augmentation of the alveolar crest or the maxillary sinus floor prior to or in conjunction with implant placement. Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients were treated with a porcine bone substitute and barrier membranes (OsteoBiol, Tecnoss Dental, Turin, Italy) for lateral bone augmentation (Group 1a) and healing of bone defects (Group 1b) or for augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor using either a replaceable (Group 2a) or an infractured bone window (Group 2b). A total of 34 implants (Neoss Ltd., Harrogate, UK) were placed in conjunction or 5 to 7 months after the procedure. Implants were followed with implant stability measurements at placement and abutment connection, and with intraoral radiographs at abutment connection and after at least 1 year of loading. A biopsy for histology and morphometry was taken at the first reentry operation. Results: All but one of the procedures was successful (94.7%) as one maxillary sinus procedure (Group 2a) resulted in insufficient bone for implant placement. One of the 34 implants failed, giving an implant survival rate of 97.1% after 1 year. Implant stability measurements showed a mean stability of 71.9 ± 7.7 implant stability quotient (ISQ) at placement, which significantly increased to 75.3 ± 6.8 ISQ at abutment connection (p = .03). The average bone loss was 0.5 ± 0.7 mm during 1 year. Histology revealed new bone formation at the PB surface, which formed bridges between particles and between particles and preexisting bone. The presence of scalloped resorption lacunae and new osteons inside the particles indicated ongoing resorption/remodeling of the particles. The histomorphometric analyses showed that the total specimen area consisted of, in average, 56.5 ± 15.7% mineralized tissue of which 24.8 ± 13.9% of the total area was PB particles. Conclusion: This study showed good clinical results when using a PB substitute and barrier membranes for augmentation of the alveolar crest and maxillary sinus. Histology revealed bone condensation properties and indicated that the material can be resorbed with time.     

A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the crown-to-implant ratio (C/I) ratio and different implant prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss around dental implants placed in the posterior region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 192 ITI dental implants were consecutively placed in premolars and molars of 83 partially edentulous patients. All implants were restored by means of ceramic-to-metal fused fixed partial dentures or a single crown. Patients were followed as part of a prospective longitudinal study focusing on implant success. Surgical, radiographic and clinical variables were collected at the 1-year recall after implant placement and at the most recent clinical evaluation. Radiographic parameters were evaluated on periapical radiographs taken with a standardized long-cone paralleling technique. Implant restorations were divided into three groups according to their respective clinical C/I ratios: (a) 0-0.99, (b) 1-1.99 and (c) >or=2. RESULTS: The mean clinical C/I ratio was 1.77+/-0.56 mm. A total of 51 implants (26.5%) showed a clinical C/I ratio equal to or greater than 2. In this group, three implants failed, giving a cumulative survival rate of 94.1%. Crestal bone loss was -0.34+/-0.27 mm in group a, -0.03+/-0.15 mm in group b and -0.02+/-0.26 mm in group c. Differences among groups were statistically significant (P=0.009). Mode of retention, splinting or presence of cantilever extensions did not have an effect on crestal bone loss around ITI dental implants. CONCLUSIONS: Implant restorations with C/I ratios between 2 and 3 may be successfully used in the posterior areas of the jaw.     

Long-term evaluation of 282 implants in maxillary and mandibular molar positions: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Placement of implants into molar positions presents diagnostic, surgical and prosthetic challenges. There are few reported studies for implants placed into molar positions. The purpose of this prospective longitudinal study is to report long-term clinical outcomes for 282 implants placed into molar positions. METHODS: Two-hundred-twelve patients received 282 implants. Implant size, location, jaw shape, and bone quality were recorded for all implants placed into molar positions. Seventy implants were inserted in maxillae and 212 in mandibles. Marginal bone level changes in maxillae and mandibles were measured from non-standardized periapical radiographs taken at abutment connection and an average follow-up of 3.9 years. Mesial-distal implant measurements were made from the top of the implant cylinder to the first point of bone to implant contact. In mandibles, 39 implants were used for single molar replacements, 67 implants were placed into excellent bone quality (type I) and 113 were in good bone quality (type 11); 145 implants were placed into bone with moderate bone resorption (type B); 166 implants were placed in first molar positions and 46 in second molar sites. RESULTS: At 6 years the cumulative success rate (CSR) for mandibular implants is 91.5%, and the success rate from the 2 to 3 year follow-up is 100%. Of the 70 implants placed in maxillae, 16 replaced single molars. Thirty-two implants were placed in jaw shape B with type 2-bone quality. For maxillary implants, the 6-year CSR was 82.9% and the success rate remained steady at 100% after the 2 to 3 year follow-up. For maxillary implants, at abutment connection the average marginal bone level was 1.67 mm, while at follow-up it was 1.98 mm. These differences were statistically significant (P = 0.04), but are not considered to be clinically significant. For mandibular implants, at abutment connection the mean marginal bone level as measured from radiographs was 2.11 mm, and at follow-up was 2.02 mm. This slight gain in bone level was not statistically significant and is not considered to be clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this prospective longitudinal study of implants placed into molar positions indicates favorable clinical outcomes. These CSR rates (91.5% mandibles, 82.9% maxillae) are less than what has been reported for implants placed into mandibular and maxillary anterior segments. Differences in outcomes between anterior and posterior locations may be related to bone quality and quantity.     

Long-term results in placement of screw-type implants in the pterygomaxillary-pyramidal region

PURPOSE: To present the long-term results for screw-type implants consecutively placed in the pterygomaxillary-pyramidal region in the treatment of patients with posterior maxillary edentulism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-two implants were inserted in 92 partially edentulous patients using cylindric osteotomes as bone-site formers, thus minimizing the use of drills in the bone preparation. RESULTS: The 152 implants placed were loaded for an average of 89.7+/-30.7 months. There were a total of 8 failures; 6 took place between implant placement and prosthesis delivery (early failures), and 2 failed in following functional loading. The overall survival rate was 94.7%. Discussion: Cylindric osteotomes allow the surgeon to accurately place implants. The use of surgical drilling was minimized, resulting in lowered surgical risk and diminished bone loss. CONCLUSION: Implant placement in the posterior pterygomaxillary region using cylindric osteotomes for osteotomy preparation resulted in an implant survival rate of 94.7%.     

Evaluation of Primary Stability of Self‐Tapping and Non‐Self‐Tapping Dental Implants. A 12‐Week Clinical Study

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between surgical techniques and implant macro‐design (self‐tapping/non‐self‐tapping) for the optimization of implant stability in the low‐density bone present in the posterior maxilla using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Materials and Methods: A total of 102 implants were studied. Fifty‐six self‐tapping BlueSkyBredent® (Bredent GmbH&Co.Kg®, Senden, Germany) and 56 non‐self‐tapping Standard Plus Straumann® (Institut Straumann AG®, Waldenburg, Switzerland) were placed in the posterior segment of the maxilla. Implants of both types were placed in sites prepared with either lateral bone‐condensing or with bone‐drilling techniques. Implant stability measurements were performed using RFA immediately after implant placement and weekly during a 12‐week follow‐up period. Results: Both types of implants placed after bone condensing achieved significantly higher stability immediately after surgery, as well as during the entire 12‐week observation period compared with those placed following bone drilling. After bone condensation, there were no significant differences in primary stability or in implant stability after the first week between both implant types. From 2 to 12 postoperative weeks, significantly higher stability was shown by self‐tapping implants. After bone drilling, self‐tapping implants achieved significantly higher stability than non‐self‐tapping implants during the entire follow‐up period. Conclusions: The outcomes of the present study indicate that bone drilling is not an effective technique for improving implant stability and, following this technique, the use of self‐tapping implants is highly recommended. Implant stability optimization in the soft bone can be achieved by lateral bone‐condensing technique, regardless of implant macro‐design.     

Sinus Elevation with an Alloplastic Material and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A 1-Stage Procedure in Severely Atrophic Maxillae

Aims and objective

The aim of the study is to evaluate clinically and radiographically the long term success of one-stage direct (lateral) sinus lift procedure using alloplastic bone graft material and bio-absorbable membrane in conjunction with two stage implant placement in atrophic partially edentulous posterior maxilla.

Materials and methods

One stage direct maxillary sinus lift in conjunction with two stage implant placement was carried out in 12 patients at 13 sites. All the patients were partially edentulous with posterior maxillary alveolar ridge height of >5 mm and were in the age group of 20–50 years. Bioactive glass putty, bio-absorbable collagen membrane and 3.75 × 11.5 mm implants were used. Loading of implants was done 6 months after placement of implants. Patients were evaluated clinically and radio-graphically 6, 18, 30 months after placement of implants to assess increase in residual ridge height, peri-implant condition (marginal bone loss, plaque and gingival index) and implant stability.

Results

Maxillary first molar was the most common site (69.23 %) for sinus lift and implant placement. Caries was the most common cause (76.92 %) for loss of tooth. Increase in residual ridge height ranged from (71.43 to 133.33 %) as measured by Denta-Scan. Implant survival rate was 100 %. Marginal bone loss ranged from 0.68 to 1.22 mm. Implant stability was measured by periotest (−2.7 to −3.6). Only one patient had perforation of sinus membrane, but it was sealed satisfactorily by bio-absorbable membrane.

Conclusion

One stage lateral sinus lift procedure with alloplastic bone graft material in combination with 2 stage implant placement has a predictable outcome in patients with severe resorption of posterior maxilla.