A Phase I study of continuous infusion doxorubicin and paclitaxel chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer.

A Phase I study of paclitaxel and doxorubicin administered as concurrent 96-h continuous i.v. infusion was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of this combination in women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer. The paclitaxel dose was fixed at 100 mg/m2 (25 mg/m2/day for 4 days). The dose of doxorubicin was escalated from 30 mg/m2 (7.5 mg/m2/day for 4 days) in increments of 10 mg/m2 until dose-limiting toxicity was observed. All patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg/kg/day prophylactically. Apparent steady-state plasma levels of both drugs were determined in the final cohort of patients treated at the MTD. A total of 17 patients received 52 cycles of therapy. The median age was 58 years, and all patients had previously received one to five different regimens (median, 2) of chemotherapy, including both platinum and paclitaxel. The treatment was tolerated well, with grade 1-2 nausea being the most frequent side effect (73% of cycles). Anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and mucositis became dose limiting at the fourth dose level, defining the MTD of doxorubicin in this regimen as 50 mg/m2. There were four partial responses and one complete response in 15 evaluable patients. Apparent steady-state plasma concentrations (mean +/- SD) of paclitaxel and doxorubicin in the three patients treated at the MTD were 33.9 +/- 12.5 nM and 15.7 +/- 1.3 nM, respectively. Paclitaxel and doxorubicin by continuous infusion is a well-tolerated and active chemotherapy regimen for recurrent ovarian cancer.     

Phase I study of mitozantrone, methotrexate and mitomycin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) in patients with advanced breast cancer.

The combination of mitozantrone, methotrexate and mitomycin (3M) gives a response rate of around 50% in patients with advanced breast cancer. The predominant toxicity is haematological. In this study, previously untreated patients were given 3M with increasing doses of mitozantrone (7-14 mg m-2) with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (metHuG-CSF) (filgrastim) to prevent marrow toxicity. Doses administered were 7 mg m-2 mitomycin i.v. 6 weekly, methotrexate i.v. 35 mg m-2 (maximum 50 mg) 3 weekly and mitozantrone i.v. 3 weekly as follows: 7 mg m-2, six patients (group 1); 10 mg m-2, six patients (group 2); 12 mg m-2, six patients (group 3); 14 mg m-2, six patients (group 4); all on day 1 for six cycles at the assigned dose. All patients received filgrastim (Amgen 0.3 mg ml-1) at a dose of 5 micrograms kg-1 subcutaneously daily on days 4-17 of each cycle. All treatment was given on an out-patient basis. A total of 24 patients were entered into the study. The median age was 63 years (range 48-75). ECOG performance status was 0 in ten, 1 in 11 patients and 2 in three patients. Locoregional disease alone was present in seven patients. The remainder had one or more sites of metastases. The actual dose administered to the 24 patients was as follows. The six patients in group 1 all completed six courses of treatment as per protocol. In group 2, three patients completed six courses, two stopped because of toxicity after one and four courses and one had progressive disease after one course. In group 3, three patients completed and three stopped early because of progressive disease. In group 4, two patients completed, one progressed after four courses and three responding patients stopped treatment because of toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose of mitozantrone in the 3M combination was 12 mg m-2. The use of filgrastim with increasing doses of chemotherapy prevents neutropenia, but other toxicities, namely thrombocytopenia and lethargy, then become dose limiting.     

Phase I study of accelerated FEC with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Lenograstim) support.

With the aim of increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy in breast cancer, 14 patients with stage II-IV breast cancer were treated with FEC chemotherapy at 2 week intervals together with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms kg-1 s.c. on days 2-14. Five of six patients completed six courses of 5-fluorouracil 600 mg m-2, epirubicin 60 mg m-2 and cylcophosphamide 600 mg m-2 within 11 weeks. Eight patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil 700 mg m-2, epirubicin 70 mg m-2 and cyclophosphamide 700 mg m-2 and four had dose-limiting toxicity with sepsis, thrombocytopenia or mucositis. All patients who received G-CSF had satisfactory neutrophil counts by day 15 of each course. Cumulative anaemia and thrombocytopenia were observed, but treatment at the first dose was tolerable. Seven of eight patients with measurable disease had partial responses. This regimen permits a 50% increase in dose intensity compared with conventional treatment at 3 week intervals and warrants further evaluation.     

Paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or recombinant human interleukin 3 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ovarian cancer: a feasibility study.

The tolerability and efficacy of four courses of paclitaxel and ifosfamide plus cisplatin every 3 weeks was evaluated in patients with residual or refractory ovarian cancer. Additionally, supportive haematological effects of recombinant human interleukin 3 (rhIL-3) and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were studied. Paclitaxel starting dose was 135 mg m(-2) (day 1), with ifosfamide dose 1.2 g m(-2) day(-1) (days 2-4) and cisplatin dose 30 mg m(-2) day(-1) (days 2-4). All 16 patients received 5.0 microg kg(-1) day(-1) G-CSF (days 7-16) and, in addition, eight patients were randomized to receive 10 microg kg(-1) day(-1) rhIL-3 (days 5-9). Paclitaxel and ifosfamide doses were reduced when grade IV haematological toxicity occurred. In the absence of grade IV haematological toxicity and normal recovery of haematopoiesis, paclitaxel dose was escalated. Toxicity was evaluable in 56 courses, with haematological effects in 52. Despite antiemetic treatment, nausea and vomiting (> or = grade I) occurred in 50 courses. Five patients had persisting peripheral neuropathy. Renal and liver function were not affected. Grade IV neutropenia occurred in 12 out of 52 courses, with neutropenic fever in two patients, both of whom died from fatal septicaemia. Grade IV thrombocytopenia without bleeding was observed in 15 courses. Grade IV haematological toxicity was associated with hepatic metastases and concurrent increases in alkaline phosphatase (P <0.001) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (P=0.007). No relation was found between haematological toxicity and pharmacokinetic parameters of paclitaxel. Patients treated with rhIL-3 showed a tendency to a faster platelet recovery (not affecting platelet nadir), and the cisplatin dose intensity was higher (P=0.025). Six of the nine evaluable patients had a tumour response. The overall median progression-free survival was 7 months and the overall mean survival was 13 months. In conclusion, this potentially interesting combination as second-line treatment showed a low tolerability with unexpected mortality, while rhIL-3 administration tended to induce a more rapid platelet recovery.     

Phase I study of vinorelbine and docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Purpose: Vinorelbine and docetaxel are two active agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. When given together, these drugs exhibit synergistic antitumor activity without significant pharmacokinetic interaction. The dose-limiting toxicities of this combination are neutropenic fever and mucositis. Adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) might lessen the toxicity and increase the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination. The aim of this study was to determine the MTD of vinorelbine and docetaxel given in combination with G-CSF. Patients and methods: Between August 1997 and December 1998, 14 patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in this study. All patients had received doxorubicin-based therapy, and 46% had received paclitaxel in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Patients were treated with vinorelbine at a starting dose of 20 mg/m ² intravenously over 10 min on days 1 and 5 and docetaxel at a starting dose of 85 mg/m ² intravenously over 1 hr on day 1, following the vinorelbine. Treatments were repeated every 21 days. Prophylactic G-CSF 5 mcg/kg was given subcutaneously on days 3-10. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute's grading system. Results: A total of 65 cycles was administered at dose levels 0, -1, -2, and -3. The median absolute granulocyte count nadir for all courses was 200 mm^{- 3} (range, 0.1-7700 mm^{- 3}), and the median time to this nadir was 9 days (range, 7-30). The median platelet nadir was 163 (range, 27-401k), and the median time to this nadir was 8 days (range, 7-30). The most common grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities for all courses were fatigue and myalgia, which occurred in 32 and 10 cycles, respectively. Neutropenic fever was encountered in 11 cycles. Three patients developed colitis-like pictures, two of whom died as a result. Consequently, the protocol was closed to accrual before a MTD was reached. Conclusion: The combination of vinorelbine, docetaxel, and G-CSF in our hands has proven to be a toxic regimen, even when relatively low doses of vinorelbine and docetaxel are given. Meticulous observation of patients receiving this combination is warranted since the combination resulted in two deaths in this study.     

Phase I trial of irinotecan and amrubicin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

We conducted a phase I trial of irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, combined with amrubicin, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) support to overcome the neutropenia associated with this particular combination. The aim was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of amrubicin combined with a fixed dose of CPT-11 and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of this combination in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) patients.

Methods

Fifteen patients with ED-SCLC were treated at 3-week intervals with amrubicin on days 1–3 plus 60?mg/m² CPT-11 on days 1 and 8. In addition, prophylactic rhG-CSF (50?μg/m²) was given from day 4 to day 21, except on the day of CPT-11 administration. Amrubicin was started at 30?mg/m² and then escalated in 5?mg/m² increments until MTD was reached.

Results

The MTD of amrubicin was 35?mg/m², since 2 of 4 patients experienced DLTs during the first cycle of treatment at the 40 mg/m² dose level. Neutropenia, neutropenic fever, ileus, and diarrhea were the DLTs. There were 13 partial responses among the 13 assessable patients, yielding an overall response rate of 100?%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.4?months and 13.4?months, respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of amrubicin and CPT-11 showed high activity against ED-SCLC with acceptable toxicity. Use of rhG-CSF allowed the dose of amrubicin to be raised 40?% above that in the original regimen (60?mg/m² CPT-11 and 25?mg/m² amrubicin).     

Phase I and pharmacodynamic study of taxol in refractory acute leukemias

Taxol, a novel antimicrotubule agent that enhances tubulin polymerization and microtubule stability, was administered to adults with refractory leukemias as a 24-h i.v. infusion in a Phase I study. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose of taxol administered on this schedule to patients with acute leukemias and describe the nonhematological toxicities which became dose limiting. The starting dose, 200 mg/m2, was based on the maximum tolerated dose in solid tumor trials, in which myelosuppression precluded dose escalation. Seventeen patients received 28 evaluable courses at 200, 250, 315, and 390 mg/m2. Severe mucositis limited further dose escalation. Other nonhematological effects included peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, myalgias, arthralgias, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and an acute pulmonary reaction that was presumptively due to taxol's Cremophor vehicle. Mean peak taxol plasma concentrations at all dose levels were in the range of concentrations that were previously demonstrated to induce microtubule bundles, a morphological effect associated with cytotoxicity, in leukemia cells in vitro. Pretreatment blasts from 12 patients were incubated with taxol ex vivo. Taxol-induced microtubule bundles were apparent in the blasts of eight patients who also had cytoreduction of tumor, and sensitivity to bundle formation was related to the magnitude of antitumor activity. In contrast, taxol did not induce microtubule bundles ex vivo in the blasts of the other four total nonresponders. Based on this study, the maximum tolerated doses and recommended Phase II doses for taxol, limited by nonhematological toxicity and administered as a 24-h i.v. infusion to patients with refractory leukemias, are 390 and 315 mg/m2. Phase II trials at these myelosuppressive doses are required to determine taxol's activity in the treatment of leukemias. In addition, further evaluation of microtubule bundle formation ex vivo in Phase II studies is necessary to determine the ultimate utility of this assay in assessing tumor sensitivity to taxol.     

Phase I/II study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer

Twelve patients with advanced small cell carcinoma of the bronchus were treated by continuous infusion of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) at the following dose levels: 1 microgram, 5 micrograms, 10 micrograms, 20 micrograms and 40 micrograms kg-1 day-1 for 5 days. No toxicities resulted from the treatment and in all 12 patients the number of peripheral neutrophils increased rapidly to a maximum of 100 x 10(9) l-1 at 10 micrograms kg-1 day-1. The neutrophils were shown to be functionally normal in tests of their mobility and bactericidal activity. During the phase II part of the study the patients were treated by a combination of intravenous adriamycin 50 mg m-2, ifosfamide 5 g m-2 by i.v. infusion with mesna 8 g m-2 on day 1, and etoposide 120 mg m-2 on days 1, 2 and 3 also intravenously. The chemotherapy regime was repeated every 3 weeks. RhG-CSF was given to each patient for 14 days on alternate cycles of chemotherapy and reduced the period of absolute neutropenia considerably (median of 80%), with a return to normal, or above normal, neutrophil counts within 2 weeks after day 1 of chemotherapy. Six severe infective episodes were observed during the cycles of chemotherapy which did not include rhG-CSF, while no infective episodes occurred when patients were treated with rhG-CSF. These results demonstrate the utility of rhG-CSF in restoring functional neutrophils to patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy.     

A phase I dose-escalation study of docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is a widely active cytotoxic agent. The principal dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the 3-weekly regimen are neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may allow higher doses of docetaxel to be administered with potentially greater anticancer efficacy. The objectives of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of docetaxel given with G-CSF support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had solid tumours and were aged 18-75 years with a WHO performance status of up to 2. Strict criteria for liver function were followed. Patients may have received one previous regimen of chemotherapy in addition to adjuvant chemotherapy. Cohorts of three to six patients received docetaxel over 60-90 min every 3 weeks, commencing at 110 mg/m(2) and escalating at 10 mg/m(2) increments. Patients also received G-CSF 5 micro g/kg/day until neutrophil recovery. A 3-day corticosteroid prophylaxis was given. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with median age 55 years (range 29-75) were included. Fourteen (48%) had previously received chemotherapy. At the 170 mg/m(2) dose level (the MTD), two of three patients had DLTs and 160 mg/m(2) was determined to be the recommended dose. The principal DLTs were skin and neurosensory toxicity. Asthenia was frequent, especially at dose levels >/=140 mg/m(2). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in only 10 patients (35%) and was not dose related, with febrile neutropenia in three patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel may be escalated considerably above standard doses when administered with G-CSF support. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 160 mg/m(2). With escalated-dose docetaxel, DLTs were non-haematological and qualitatively similar to the toxicity profile at standard doses.     

Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

A phase I study was designed to assess whether dose intensity of an ''accelerated'' cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide (CDE) regimen plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could be increased further, in an outpatient setting, by escalating the dose of each single drug of the regimen. Patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) received escalating doses of cyclophosphamide (C) 1100-1300 mg m-2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, doxorubicin (D) 50-60 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1, etoposide (E) 110-130 mg m-2 i.v. on days 1, 2, 3 and every 14 days for at least three courses. Along with chemotherapy, G-CSF (filgastrim) 5 micrograms kg-1 from day 5 to day 11 was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to all patients. Twenty-five patients were enrolled into the study. All patients at the first dose level (C 1100, D 50, E 110 x 3) completed three or more cycles at the dose and schedule planned by the protocol and no ''dose-limiting toxicity'' (DLT) was seen. At the second dose level (C 1200, D 55, E 120 x 3) three out of five patients had a DLT consisting of ''granulocytopenic fever'' (GCPF). Another six patients were treated at this dose level with the addition of ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice a day and only two patients had a DLT [one episode of documented oral candidiasis and one of ''fever of unknown origin'' (FUO) with generalised mucositis]. Accrual of patients proceeded to the third dose level (C 1300, D 60, E 130 x 3) with the prophylactic use of ciprofloxacin. Four out of six patients experienced a DLT consisting of GCPF or documented non-bacterial infection. Accrual of patients at the third dose level was then resumed adding to ciprofloxacin anti-fungal prophylaxis (fluconazole 100 mg daily) and anti-viral prophylaxis (acyclovir 800 mg twice a day) from day 5 to 11. Out of five patients treated three experienced a DLT consisting of severe leucopenia and fever or infection. With a simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration it is indeed possible to take maximum advantage of G-CSF activity and to increase CDE dose intensity by a factor 1.65-1.80 for a maximum of 3-4 courses. The role of antimicrobial prophylaxis in this setting deserves to be investigated further.     

Phase I/II study of intraperitoneal mitoxantrone in refractory ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND:: Mitoxantrone has demonstrable clinical activity when administeredintravenously in a wide range of malignancies. The feasibilityand toxicity of intra-peritoneal administration was establishedin a phase I study. The optimal dose from the phase I was subsequentlyevaluated in a phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: 19 patients with refractory malignancies and extensive abdominaldisease (13 ovarian cancer, 4 breast cancer, 2 mesothelioma)were entered in a phase I study. The dose of intraperitonealmitoxantrone was escalated from 10 mg/m², administered in 21of fluid via a Tenkhoff catheter, to 55 mg/m², in incrementsof 5 mg/m². Cycles were repeated every three weeks. Sixty-sevencycles of mitoxantrone were administered, the maximum tolerabledose being 25 mg/m². A phase II study at this dose was conductedin 14 patients with refractory ovarian cancer, all of whom hadpreviously received systemic platinum based therapy. Five ofthe 14 had also previously been treated with intraperitonealcarboplatin. Fifty-one cycles were administered. RESULTS:: The dose limiting toxicity in the phase I study was peritonealirritation and pain. Leucopenia was frequent at doses equalor greater than 30 mg/m². Three complete remissions were documentedin the phase I study (2 breast cancer and 1 ovarian cancer).There was no significant haematological toxicity in the phaseII assessment, though local toxicity precluded further therapyin 2 patients. No objective responses were seen in the phaseII evaluation. CONCLUSIONS:: These studies demonstrate the feasibility of intra-peritonealmitoxantrone therapy in patients with peritoneal disease, butdo not support its routine use in ovarian cancer. ovarian cancer, mitoxantrone, intraperitoneal therapy, phase I, phase II     

注射用聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子Ⅰ期临床耐受性试验

背景与目的：重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子（rhG—CSF）是防治肿瘤化放疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症的有效药物,但半衰期短,需每日给药。聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子（PEG-rhG-CSF）是将聚乙二醇与rhG—CSF结合而成的长效制剂,与常规rhG—CSF相比,能减少给药次数,避免患者反复接受注射的痛苦。本研究旨在评价PEG-rhG-CSF用于国人的安全性和耐受性,初步观察化疗后PEG—rhG—CSF升高外周血中性粒细胞和CD34^＋细胞的效果。方法：本研究为开放性试验,经病理组织学或细胞学确诊的初治非小细胞肺癌和乳腺癌患者进入本研究,受试者接受两个周期相同方案的化疗,第一周期为对照周期,第二周期在化疗药物给药结束后48h给予PEG-rhG-CSF。PEG-rhG-CSF的初始剂量为30μg／kg,递增剂量依次为60μg／kg、100μg／kg和200μg／kg,每一剂量组4例受试患者。结果：入组16例患者均可评价疗效和安全性。与PEG-rhG-CSF相关的不良反应主要有骨关节或肌肉疼痛（13／16）、疲乏（10／16）、头晕（2／16）,1例受试患者出现注射部位轻度疼痛,自行缓解。与对照周期相比,使用PEG-rhG-CSF后中性粒细胞绝对值（ANC）最低值的出现时间前移,ANC最低值提高。ANC的变化呈现一定程度的量效关系,60、100和200μg／kg剂量组均能较好地防治化疗后的中性粒细胞减少症．且维持时间较长,并能够增高外周血CD34^＋细胞的数量。未出现PEG-rhG-CSF的剂量限制性毒性,也未达到最大耐受剂量。结论：PEG-rhG-CSF显示了良好的耐受性．未出现严重不良事件。由于100μg／kg剂量组的不良反应轻于200μg／kg剂量组,疗效已能满足临床需要,因此推荐Ⅱ期临床试验的剂量为100μg／kg。     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of escalating dose of docetaxel administered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in adult advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to assess the feasibility, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of an escalating dose of docetaxel when administered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support every 3 weeks. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of docetaxel as a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks, supported by s.c. administration of human recombinant glycosilated G-CSF Granocyte (lenograstim), 5 microg/kg/day (from day 4 until neutrophil count >0.5-10(g)/liter for two consecutive days). Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel at the new recommended high-dose level. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were treated with 116 courses of docetaxel at eight dose levels ranging from 100-185 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicities were nonhematologic and included mucositis and dermatitis. Severe skin toxicity observed at 185 mg/m(2) led to discontinuing the study, and 175 mg/m(2) was selected as the recommended dose of docetaxel + G-CSF for future Phase II studies. Analysis of multiple courses revealed dermatitis, mucositis, arthralgia/myalgia, and neuropathy as the main dose-related toxic events. At 175 mg/m(2) mean +/- SD values for docetaxel plasmatic peak, area under the curve, clearance, volume of distribution, and terminal half-life were 6.7 +/- 1.7 microg/ml, 9.7 +/- 4 microg.h/ml, 34.2 +/- 12 liters/h, and 122.7 +/- 124 liters, respectively. Of the 16 patients treated at 175 mg/m(2), 8 patients responded (7 breast cancer and 1 lung cancer patients) including one complete response (1 breast cancer patient). CONCLUSIONS: Using G-CSF support allows substantial dose escalation of docetaxel. Whether such a dose increase improves the response rate warrants further investigation. At the highest dose level studied, pharmacokinetic parameters seem to maintain a linear profile.     

Therapy of advanced prostate cancer with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor is a pleiotropic cytokine capable of inducing systemic immune responses against experimental and human tumors. To evaluate the efficacy of GM-CSF treatment in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, we conducted sequential Phase II studies in 36 men with progressive disease after androgen deprivation and antiandrogen withdrawal. In a first cohort of patients (n = 23), GM-CSF was administered s.c. at a dose of 250 microg/m2 daily for 14 days of a 28-day treatment period. After we observed oscillating prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses in several patients in this first cohort, a second trial was performed in which patients (n = 13) received maintenance GM-CSF (250 microg/m2 three times weekly) after the first 14 days of daily GM-CSF. All patients were treated until disease progression. Response was assessed by evaluation of serial changes in serum PSA and sequential imaging studies. In cohort I, 10 of 22 patients (45%) had a PSA versus time plot with a sawtooth pattern, with PSA declining during GM-CSF therapy and climbing during the off-therapy period; 5 patients had at least two consecutive declines in PSA, with a median response duration of 3.5 months. All but one patient in cohort II experienced a decline in PSA (median decline, 32%), but a PSA decline greater than 50% and sustained for more than 6 weeks was seen in only one patient, who had a >99% decline in PSA and an improvement in bone scan lasting for 14+ months. Changes in PSA levels could not be attributed to direct or indirect effects of GM-CSF on the PSA assay or down-regulation of PSA expression by GM-CSF. Toxicity was very mild, consisting primarily of transient constitutional symptoms and injection site reactions. These data suggest that GM-CSF may have antitumor activity in advanced prostate cancer, and the use of GM-CSF may be a confounding variable when PSA responses are used as an end point in clinical trials evaluating new regimens for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal thioTEPA in patients with ovarian cancer

Summary A total of 15 patients with residual ovarian cancer confined to the peritoneal cavity after first-line systemic chemotherapy were treated with triethylene-thiophosphoramide (thioTEPA) in a phase I study. A total of 50 courses of thioTEPA were given intraperitoneally in doses ranging from 30 to 80 mg/m². The dose limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, which occurred at 80 mg/m² and was frequently prolonged. Short-lived nausea and vomiting was easily controlled, and there was no local toxicity. Three patients remain free of disease progression at 6, 6 and 12 months. ThioTEPA concentrations were measured by gas chromatography. Peritoneal fluid concentrations declined rapidly in a first-order fashion, with a half-life of 0.96 ± 0.1 h. A mean of 93% of the drug was absorbed during the 4-h dwell time. Peak plasma levels were achieved 30–60 min after drug instillation and were substantially lower than corresponding peritoneal levels. A pharmacokinetic advantage for intraperitoneal delivery was detected for peak drug concentration (24.9 ± 8.5) and AUC (9.2 ± 4.8). Based on this study, the recommended dose for intraperitoneal thioTEPA is 60 mg/m² every 3–4 weeks. However, the rapid absorption of this drug from the peritoneum, secondary to thioTEPA’s small molecular weight and lipophilic nature, suggests that it has only a limited role in intraperitoneal therapy.     

Phase II trial of gemcitabine, epirubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Although the novel cytidin analogue gemcitabine has shown superior anti-tumour activity than 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer, further improvements of therapeutic results are warranted. This goal might be achieved by combining gemcitabine with other active drugs. This trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of such a combination regimen with epirubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic disease. Seventy patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this multicentre trial. Patients received 4-weekly courses of a combination regimen consisting of epirubicin 60 mg m(-2) given as intravenous bolus injection on day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) infused over 30 min on days 1, 8 and 15, and G-CSF administered at 5 microg kg(-1) day(-1) subcutaneously from days 2-6 during each cycle. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by conventional measures, i.e. objective response, progression-free and overall survival, as well as by analysis of clinical benefit response (defined as > or = 50% reduction in pain intensity, > or = 50% reduction in daily analgesic consumption, and/or > or = 20-point improvement in Karnofsky performance status that was sustained for > or = 4 consecutive weeks). Of 66 patients evaluable for objective response, one achieved complete and 13 partial remissions, for an overall response rate of 21% (95% confidence interval (CI), 12-33%); 27 additional patients (41%) had stable and 25 (38%) increasing disease. The median time to progression was 3.8 months. Median survival was 7.8 months, and the probability of surviving beyond 12 months was 21.2%. Out of 60 patients with tumour-related symptoms, who were considered evaluable for clinical benefit response, 26 (43%) experienced significant palliation. The median time to achieve a clinical benefit response was 7 weeks, and its median duration was 22 weeks. Chemotherapy was well-tolerated with leukopenia/granulocytopenia representing the most common and dose-limiting side-effect. Gastrointestinal and other subjective toxicities were infrequent and generally rated minor. We conclude that the combination of gemcitabine, epirubicin and G-CSF seems to be an effective palliative treatment with only moderate toxic effects in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Our results in terms of objective and clinical benefit response, as well as survival seem to suggest an advantage over gemcitabine-monotherapy, though this remains to be confirmed in a randomized trial.     

Phase I/II trial of intravenous Doxil and whole abdomen hyperthermia in patients with refractory ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: A phase I/II study of Doxil combined with whole abdomen hyperthermia was conducted in patients with refractory ovarian cancer. Liposomal doxorubicin combined with hyperthermia has been shown to increase both liposomal delivery and drug extravasation into tumour xenografts resulting in enhanced cytotoxic effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with either recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian cancer were enrolled. All patients had either measurable or assessable disease. Patients received intravenous (IV) Doxil at a dose of 40 mg m-2 as a 1-h infusion followed by whole abdomen hyperthermia. The phase I portion of the study was performed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of hyperthermia. Quality of life (QoL) was performed at baseline, prior to each cycle and every 3 months. Plasma pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the first cycle. RESULTS: Ten patients participated in the phase I portion of the study which demonstrated that the MTD of hyperthermia was 60 min after either average vaginal and rectal temperatures of 40 degrees C had been achieved or after 30 min of power application, whichever was shorter. All 30 patients were either paclitaxel and/or platinum resistant initially or developed resistant disease. The median number of prior chemotherapeutic regimens was three (range 2-8) and six patients had been previously treated with Doxil. There were three partial responses for a response rate of 10% (95% CI: [2%, 27%]) and eight patients (27%; 95% CI: [12%, 46%]) had disease stabilization. The median time to progression or death was 3.4 months (95% CI: [2.6, 5.2]) and the median survival was 10.8 months (95% CI: [8.8, 17.4]). Twelve patients (40%) experienced palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), but only four (13%) experienced grade 3-4 PPE toxicity. Doxil systemic exposure was higher in those with grade 3-4 PPE compared to those with no PPE. None of the patients had grade 3-4 thermal toxicity due to hyperthermia. QoL was not decreased in patients responding to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with intravenous Doxil and whole abdomen hyperthermia for patients with platinum/paclitaxel resistant ovarian cancer is feasible and does not negatively impact quality of life.     

CODE chemotherapy with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer.

Sixty-three patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive either cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and etoposide (CODE) alone or CODE plus recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF). rhG-CSF administration in support of CODE chemotherapy resulted in increased mean total received dose intensity for all drugs (P = 0.03) with a significant improvement in survival (P = 0.004).     

Phase II study and long-term follow-up of patients treated with taxol for advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Based on the results of our phase I study that demonstrated the antitumor activity of taxol in a previously treated patient with ovarian cancer, a phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of taxol in patients with metastatic ovarian cancer and to evaluate further the toxicity of taxol in this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with metastatic ovarian cancer received taxol (180 to 250 mg/m2) as a 24-hour continuous infusion. A premedication regimen was used to reduce the likelihood of an acute hypersensitivity reaction. RESULTS: Six of 30 assessable patients demonstrated complete responses (one patient) or partial responses (five patients; 20%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6% to 34%; range, 2 to 30 months). Additionally, one patient had a less than partial objective response (2 months), and two patients had stable disease for 6 and 15 months. Those responders had a median survival of 27 months, and the nonresponders had a median survival of 6 months (P = .0001). Myelosuppression was the most significant toxicity. Other adverse effects included alopecia and peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Taxol has significant activity in ovarian cancer and should be studied in combination with other active agents earlier in this disease.