共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
Paquerault S 《Academic radiology》2011,18(5):533-535
5.
A Granata L Zanoli S Clementi P Fatuzzo P Di Nicolò F Fiorini 《The British journal of radiology》2014,87(1038)
In renal diagnosis, the B-mode ultrasound is used to provide an accurate study of the renal morphology, whereas the colour and power Doppler are of strategic importance in providing qualitative and quantitative information about the renal vasculature, which can also be obtained through the assessment of the resistive index (RI). To date, this is one of the most sensitive parameters in the study of kidney diseases and allows us to quantify the changes in renal plasma flow. If a proper Doppler ultrasound examination is carried out and a critical analysis of the values obtained is performed, the RI measurement at the interlobar artery level has been suggested in the differential diagnosis between nephropathies. The aim of this review is to highlight the pathological conditions in which the study of intrarenal RI provides useful information about the pathophysiology of renal diseases in both the native and the transplanted kidneys.Renal ultrasonography has acquired a strategic importance in the early detection of several renal diseases thanks to its non-invasivity, low cost, reliability and high sensitivity. The B-mode ultrasound is a widely used technique for the study of kidney morphology, including renal pelvis, to provide information on parenchymal echogenicity and to detect space-occupying lesions.The characteristic ultrasonographic pattern in chronic kidney disease (small kidneys, reduced parenchymal thickness and detection of cysts) allows a simple and accurate diagnosis of this pathological condition. On the other hand, the diagnostic validity of the B-mode ultrasound in the detection of acute renal disease is still under debate because of the lack of sensitivity and specificity of the commonly used parameters such as the increase of renal size and the reduction of the parenchymal echogenicity.The advantage of using Doppler ultrasound (DUS) lies in its ability in detecting not only renal morphological abnormalities but also functional ones; colour Doppler, power DUS and spectral analysis provide qualitative and quantitative haemodynamic information about the intrarenal and extrarenal vasculature highlighting changes in the renal blood flow.The measure of renal resistive index (RI) or Pourcelot index is one of the most sensitive parameters in the study of disease-derived alterations of renal plasma flow.The aim of this review is to evaluate the significance of the renal RI as a non-invasive marker of renal histological damage in several pathological conditions (Clinical setting RI Proposed clinical value All nephropathies >0.75 Indicator of tubulointerstitial nephropathy1 AKI >0.75 Useful in discriminating between ATN and pre-renal form2 Chronic renal failure >0.80 Indicator of irreversible damage >0.70 Independent risk factor for worsening function3–6 Renal colic >0.70 Signs of complete ureteral obstruction7,8 ∆RI > 0.08–0.10 Kidney transplantation >0.80 In SKT graft, unfavourable prognostic factor9 >0.80 Association with recipient survival10 >0.75 Long-term RF for NODAT11 Diabetes Type 1—children 7–15 years old >0.64 Risk factor for diabetic nephropathy12 Type 2 >0.70 Indicator of advanced glomerular lesions and/or arteriosclerotic lesions13 >0.73 Predictor of DN and its progression14 Renal artery stenosis >0.80 Poor renal improvement after PTA15 Cirrhosis >0.78 Risk factor for HRS12