A simple semi-rapid HIV-1&2 confirmatory immunoassay using magnetic particles

The Bionor HIV-1&2 Confirmatory Test is a semi-rapid simple immunoassay based on magnetic particles for the confirmation of serological status to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The specificity and sensitivity of this assay was evaluated by comparison with the Diagnostic Biotechnology HIV-1 Western blot (WB) 2.2 and the HIV-2/SBL-6669 WB. Bionor's confirmatory test demonstrated 98% specificity when testing sero-negative blood donors and false positive sera in screening tests compared to 81.5 and 71.6%, respectively, using the HIV-1 WB. The sensitivity of this assay for HIV-1 antibody positive sera was 97.9% compared to the WB which was 99.5%. When testing confirmed HIV-2 antibody positive samples, 2/100 scored negative using this confirmatory test similar to other HIV-2 peptide-based line immunoassays available commercially, whilst 8/100 were indeterminate reacting to HIV-2 membrane antigens only. Bionor's confirmatory test detected HIV-1 seropositivity earlier than the WB in longitudinal seroconversion panels and could discriminate between HIV-1 and -2 infection. The number of indeterminate responses was generally reduced significantly using Bionor's confirmatory test compared to the HIV-1 WB. The greater specificity, speed and ease of interpretation of Bionor's confirmatory test renders it an attractive and cost effective alternative to the WB for confirming HIV serological status worldwide.     

Confirmation of HIV seropositivity: comparison of a novel radioimmunoprecipitation assay to immunoblotting and virus culture

A recently developed radioimmunoprecipitation assay, using 125I-labeled human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral proteins enriched for glycoproteins gp120env, gp41env (GRIPA), was compared to the immunoblot assay with respect to sensitivity and specificity for the detection of antibodies to HIV. Longitudinal sets of serum samples of seroconverting homosexual men were studied, as were sera of six blood-bank donors likely to be false-positive in immunoblot. In addition, HIV isolation was attempted from white blood cells of these blood-bank donors and of seropositive and seronegative individuals. In sets of seroconversion samples, the GRIPA appeared at least as sensitive as the immunoblot. Some sera already were clearly positive in the GRIPA at a time when there was only weak reactivity in immunoblot. In contrast, sera from blood-bank donors that were regarded as false-positive in immunoblot were negative in GRIPA. Virus culture from these donors was also negative. It is concluded that reactivity in immunoblot to core proteins only may well be false-positive, whereas antibody reactivity in the radioimmunoprecipitation assay to p24gag solely suggests ongoing seroconversion. This feature, in addition to a sensitivity for anti-gp120env comparable to immunoblotting, makes the GRIPA a useful confirmatory assay in sera that yield conflicting results in other HIV-antibody assays.     

The expert diagnosis of HIV infection by radioimmunoprecipitation]

Using a panel of sera from HIV-infected persons and donors, the authors showed that radioimmunoprecipitation assays compare favourably with immunoblotting assays. With radioimmunoprecipitation, cross reactions were observed between HIV-2 antigens and HIV-2 antibodies, and that the nature of cross reactivity differs from that observed with immunoblotting. Potentials of radioimmunoprecipitation assays as a confirmatory test for use with sera that have given indeterminate results in immunoblotting assays and contradictory results in enzyme immunoassays are examined.     

Alternative confirmatory strategy for anti-HIV antibody detection.

Enzyme immuno assays for simultaneous screening of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 (EIA HIV-1 + HIV-2) have recently been developed. Confirming all reactive EIA HIV-1/2 screening results by Western blot (WB) for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies is expensive. Six different EIA HIV-1/2 screening assays and one supplemental Line immuno assay (INNO-LIA HIV-1/HIV-2 Ab (LIA)) for confirmation of reactive EIA HIV-1/2 screening assay results were carried out on a panel of 400 sera of which 13% were HIV-1- and 2.5% were HIV-2-positive. The LIA was used as the 'gold standard'. Retrospectively, the results of the six EIA HIV-1/2 were evaluated in pairs (A and B), applying B to those sera reactive in A. A+B+ results were reported as positive. A+B- were either interpreted as negative or the LIA result of A+B- was accepted as the final result. At least seven of the EIA HIV-1/2 pairs gave rise to no false-positive or -negative results. This strategy was 5 times faster and resulted in a budget on average 50% lower than that of the conventional strategy. Further investigation of these alternative confirmatory strategies, in which the proposed algorithms are applied in sequential use of the different screening assays, are needed under field conditions in developing countries.     

Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection of antibody to human immunodeficiency virus in African sera

A total of 152 sera from African subjects were tested for presence of antibody to human immunodeficiency virus using four enzyme immunoassays (EIA) marketed by Abbott Diagnostics, Organon Teknika, Wellcome and Diagnostics Pasteur respectively, an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and an immunoblot assay (IBA) as reference test. The sensitivity (95 % confidence limits, CL) of the EIAs and the IFA ranged between 80.9 % and 99.1 %. The specificity of the Abbott EIA was lower (95 % CL: 38.1–72 %) than that of the other assays (95 % CL: 83.5–100 %). The use of an IFA or the Wellcome competitive EIA as confirmatory test on initially EIA positive sera yielded a specificity of 85.5–100% (95 % CL) compared with the IBA. The costs of screening by an EIA, followed by confirmatory testing of reactive sera with IFA or the Wellcome EIA and IBA on discrepant test results was similar for all combinations with the exception of initial screening with the Abbott EIA which was more expensive. Using a limited number of sera from African subjects no one test system yielded a significantly superior degree of specificity or sensitivity.     

HIV misdiagnosis: A root cause analysis leading to improvements in HIV diagnosis and patient care

BackgroundStandard diagnostic testing for HIV infection has traditionally relied on a high sensitivity HIV antibody screening test using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) followed by a high specificity antibody confirmatory test such as a Western Blot. Recently several of the screening assays have been enhanced with an ability to identify p24 antigen thereby narrowing the diagnostic window.ObjectivesTo explore the implications of enhanced HIV screening methods that may be leading to HIV misdiagnoses.Study designA patient deemed to be an HIV infected ‘elite controller’ was found to be misdiagnosed when undergoing detailed investigations prior to initiating antiretroviral therapy. A root cause analysis was performed to identify the causative factors of this misdiagnosis. A retrospective review of all “elite controllers” in Alberta, Canada revealed challenges of current HIV testing algorithms.ResultsTechnical and human factors were identified as being causative in this HIV misdiagnosis including (i) high rates of false reactive results on the Abbott ARCHITECT HIV-1&2 COMBO EIA, (ii) human error in reading the initial Western blot, (iii) HIV algorithmic directives in which confirmatory (Western blot) testing was not performed on a repeatedly reactive screen test. The outcome of this analysis identified opportunities for improvement, including implementation of a newly approved (automated) confirmatory assay and improved communication between the clinician and laboratory.ConclusionsHIV testing remains problematic despite significant advances in HIV test performance and algorithm development, presenting new and unexpected issues. Ensuring a high-quality management system including implementation of the latest HIV technologies and algorithms along with human resources and policies are required to minimize the impact of false positive diagnoses, especially in the era of universal screening and ‘test and treat’ recommendations.     

Characterization of Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination Assay-Negative Sera following Screening by Treponemal Total Antibody Enzyme Immunoassays

Following a laboratory audit, a significant number of Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA)-negative sera were identified when TPPA was used as a confirmatory assay of syphilis enzyme immunoassay (EIA) screening-reactive sera (SSRS). Sera giving such discrepant results were further characterized to assess their significance. A panel of 226 sera was tested by the Abbott Murex ICE Syphilis EIA and then by the Newmarket Syphilis EIA II. TPPA testing was performed on 223 sera. Further testing by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test, the Mercia Syphilis IgM EIA, the fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA-ABS) assay, and INNO-LIA immunoblotting was undertaken in discrepant cases. One hundred eighty-seven of 223 (83.8%) SSRS were TPPA reactive, while 26 (11.6%) sera which were reactive in both the ICE and Newmarket EIAs were nonreactive by TPPA. The majority (68%) of the TPPA-discrepant sera were from HIV-positive patients and did not represent early acute cases, based on previous or follow-up samples, which were available for 22/26 samples. FTA-ABS testing was performed on 24 of these sera; 14 (58.3%) were FTA-ABS positive, and 10 (41.7%) were FTA-ABS negative. Twenty-one of these 26 sera were tested by INNO-LIA, and an additional 4 FTA-ABS-negative samples were positive. In this study, significant numbers (18/26) of SSRS- and TPPA-negative sera were shown by further FTA-ABS and LIA (line immunoblot assay) testing to be positive. The reason why certain sera are negative by TPPA but reactive by treponemal EIA and other syphilis confirmatory assays is not clear, and these initial findings should be further explored.Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA), introduced during the 1960s, has been shown (17, 19) to be highly sensitive and specific at detecting treponemal antibodies and is still used by many laboratories. A modification of the TPHA is the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA), which has been shown (1) to perform as well as the hemagglutination assay.In recent years, a number of highly sensitive and specific enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (7) have become available, and some of these can simultaneously detect syphilis IgG and IgM, thus shortening the seronegative window following infection. Two such assays are the Abbott Murex ICE Syphilis EIA (1) and the Newmarket Laboratories Syphilis EIA II (18). United Kingdom guidelines have proposed (9, 10) that either an EIA alone or a combination of VDRL/rapid plasma reagin (RPR) tests and TPPA/TPHA can be used for syphilis screening. Furthermore, specimens that are reactive on screening require confirmatory testing with a different treponemal test that has a sensitivity equal to that used for screening and, ideally, that has greater specificity. The fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA-ABS) test has been used widely as a confirmatory test; however, treponemal Western blot/immunoblot assays (5), which have been shown to perform as well as the FTA-ABS test, have proved an attractive alternative because of their reported high sensitivity and specificity combined with their simplicity.The HPA Birmingham West Midlands Public Health Laboratory acts as a confirmatory syphilis testing center for the West Midlands of England. The aim of this evaluation was to optimize confirmatory testing of referred syphilis screening-reactive sera (SSRS).     

Evaluation of a pooling method for routine anti-HCV screening of blood donors to lower the cost burden on blood banks in countries under development

A pooling system was developed for use in anti-HCV screening of voluntary blood donors at the local Central American Red Cross blood banks, in Nicaragua, El Salvador and Honduras. The commercially available second generation anti-HCV screening kit from Abbott Laboratories (North Chicago, IL) was used with a modification in the initial serum dilution procedure. Pools of five sera were selected for routine screening, based on comparative studies of individual samples and of pools with different sample sizes. During the years 1993 and 1994 a total of 89,148 voluntary blood donors were screened and a positive prevalence rate of 0.35% was established. Of the initially positive samples, 54% confirmed positive, 30% were indeterminate and 16% were negative using the Abbott Matrix test. Significant differences of positive screening prevalence rates were found in the three countries, with average values of 0.50%, 0.23% and 0.08%, respectively, in Nicaragua, El Salvador and Honduras. These initially positive samples also showed a different confirmatory pattern with a positive rate of 64% in Nicaragua, in contrast to 20% in El Salvador. Only a few samples were available for RT-PCR amplification of HCV-RNA; however, this highly sensitive method did not appear to be more helpful than serology in confirming the HCV donor status. Overall, the data obtained indicate a fluctuation of HCV prevalence in voluntary blood donors among the three Central American countries. Further, differences were found in the percentages of initially screened positives and confirmation patterns. This information appears useful for establishing criteria in future screening policies. Thus, we suggest that the use of pooling for anti-HCV screening is beneficial in countries under development, since there are potential cost savings, as well as benefits in establishment of initial prevalence rates. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The use of simple, rapid tests to detect antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 in pooled serum specimens.

BACKGROUND: The use of pooled specimens has been proposed as a means of expanding testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies in population studies and in blood screening, while reducing laboratory costs. OBJECTIVES: To develop a strategic specimen pooling method to be used with rapid HIV antibody assays to detect positive specimens and to evaluate its performance in comparison with testing with commercial EIA and WB. STUDY DESIGN: Two lateral flow rapid HIV antibody assays, Seroz*Strip HIV-1/2(1) and Determine HIV-1/2, were evaluated for their ability to detect HIV-1 antibodies in serum and/or plasma specimens pooled in sizes ranging from two to 20 following the respective manufacturers' protocols. One thousand prospectively collected specimens and 55 seroconversion specimens were prepared in pools of five for evaluation by the two rapid HIV assays. RESULTS: Optimal detection and discrimination of HIV-1 antibody-positive and HIV-1 antibody-negative specimens was observed in pool sizes of five to ten for both assays. The ability of the two rapid assays to detect HIV-1 antibody-positive samples from commercial HIV-1 seroconversion panels contained in the pools was equivalent to that of commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and Western blot (WB) to detect HIV-1 antibody in the non-pooled samples. Application of the pooling method in prospectively collected specimens yielded excellent concordance with EIA/WB results in both sensitivity (98.88% for Seroz*Strip HIV-1/2, 100% for Determine HIV-1/2) and specificity (99.56% for Seroz*Strip HIV-1/2, 99.45% for Determine HIV-1/2). CONCLUSION: Use of a pooling strategy with either assay reduced the number of tests required by almost 50% and could provide substantial cost reductions for HIV screening in settings where HIV-1 prevalence is less than 10%.     

Use of an acute seroconversion panel to evaluate a third-generation enzyme-linked immunoassay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus-specific antibodies relative to multiple other assays

A human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)/HIV-2 antibody screening assay, the Genetic Systems HIV-1/HIV-2 PLUS O EIA, was compared to several established screening or confirmatory tests using an acute HIV seroconversion panel. The HIV-1/HIV-2 PLUS O EIA showed an improved sensitivity over all tested antibody screening methods, and detected antibody in 7 of 19 specimens found to be negative by a first-generation EIA but positive for the presence of HIV RNA.     

Testing for antibodies to AIDS-associated retrovirus (HTLV-III/LAV) by indirect fixed cell immunofluorescence: specificity, sensitivity, and applications

Seropositivity to the AIDS-associated retrovirus, HTLV-III/LAV, has profound implications. Simple and reliable tests are needed to detect such antibodies. A rapid, sensitive indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) on acetone-fixed virus-producing CEM/LAV-N1 cells was adapted for detection of human antibodies to HTLV-III/LAV. Specific and nonspecific patterns of of immunofluorescent reactivity were easily distinguished, and results paralleled those obtained by Western blotting and radioimmunoprecipitation (RIP), indicating that there is no need to confirm IFA positivity. In contrast, the commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was less reliable. False positives occurred with sera from seven hemophiliacs that were negative on Western blots, and false-negative reactions were observed on two occasions. These involved low-titer AIDS-patients' sera that were positive on Western blots, and from one of which virus was successfully isolated. Our results emphasize the requirement for confirmatory assays when the ELISA test is used for primary screening of sera for antibodies to HTLV-III/LAV. The IFA method is especially well-suited to quantitative analysis of serum antibody levels. Our data suggest that serum antibody titers rise as disease progression occurs, ultimately falling as severe complications ensue. It is suggested that in laboratories where the demand for HTLV-III/LAV antibody testing is not excessive (1,000-2,000 sera/month), IFA could serve as the only serological assay for both screening and epidemiological purposes.     

Evaluation of a recombinant human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) p21E antibody detection enzyme immunoassay as a supplementary test in HTLV-I/II antibody testing algorithms.

To evaluate the usefulness of a human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) recombinant p21E immunoassay as a supplementary test in HTLV-I/II serologic testing algorithms, we used this assay to test 378 serum samples previously categorized as positive, indeterminant, or negative for HTLV-I/II antibody, as defined by U.S. Public Health Service guidelines. We found this test to be highly sensitive for detecting antibody to HTLV-I/II env (99.4%) but slightly less specific (96.0%), particularly among samples from intravenous drug users. Our data suggest that this test is most appropriately used to confirm the absence of env antibody in samples which are repeatably reactive in an HTLV-I/II screening assay and gag reactive only by immunoblotting. Because of the high sensitivity of this recombinant p21E test, a negative result in this context could preclude radioimmunoprecipitation testing. However, pending further evaluation of the specificity of this assay, samples testing positive for p21 env antibody may require confirmation by radioimmunoprecipitation, particularly in situations in which the results will be used for diagnostic purposes or blood donor counseling.     

Cost and performance analysis of haemagglutination inhibition, passive haemagglutination, radial haemolysis, and enzyme immunoassay for measuring rubella antibody

Cost and performance of non-commercial haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and radial haemolysis (RH) tests, and the commercially available passive haemagglutination (PHA) Rubacell and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Rubazyme assays were compared in their ability to detect rubella antibodies in 316 sera. Correlation coefficients were: HI to RH 0.96; HI to EIA 0.86. All 4 tests were in agreement on pre- and post-rubella immunization sera from 10 subjects. Eleven sera collected between 1 and 15 days after natural infection possessed clear HI titres whereas only 4 of them showed positive responses by PHA, RH or EIA. Immunity screening 285 sera identified 7 discordant results (positive in 2 of 4 tests). A detailed cost analysis for testing 100 sera showed a cost per test from +2.10 for HI to +3.71 for EIA. The labour component of the total cost was different for each assay and affected the unit cost of testing a single specimen. Results are discussed in view of antibody responses to specific rubella polypeptides and recommendations for diagnosis or immunity screening are made according to the findings.     

Reliability of rapid diagnostic tests for HIV variant infection

The sensitivity of one ELISA method, six HIV-1/HIV-2 rapid screening tests, and one confirmatory test was evaluated in comparison with a third-generation EIA method (taken as the 'gold standard') and Western blot on well-characterized panels of sera. HIV diversity was represented by 50 HIV-1 group M subtype A to H, nine HIV-1 group O, 12 HIV-2, two HIV1+2 positive and six indeterminate Western blot profiles. Sensitivity during HIV-1 seroconversion was studied on 39 serial samples collected from six patients during early primary infection. Serial samples obtained from two primates during experimental primary SIV infection were used to mimic HIV-2 seroconversion samples. The sensitivity ranged from 100 to 94.6% according to the test. During seroconversion, rapid tests became positive 2-8 days later than the third-generation EIA. This reveals a major limitation of rapid tests, which are being recommended for use in developing countries. The lack of sensitivity seen during early HIV-1 seroconversion and/or limited specificity in some of the evaluated tests present serious limitations to their use in countries with high HIV incidence and variability. It is suggested that, as soon as possible, less sensitive rapid tests for blood bank screening should be abandoned in favor of highly sensitive rapid tests and/or more robust, more sensitive and cheaper ELISAs. These results stress the need for better screening tools and specific local evaluations.     

Hepatitis C virus antibodies and hepatitis C virus RNA in Chinese blood donors determined by ELISA, recombinant immunoblot assay and polymerase chain reaction.

Antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) were determined in Chinese blood donors from the city of Wuhan by a second generation ELISA screening test and a confirmatory recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA II). Two materials of 281 and 222 sera were sampled under similar conditions in 1989 and 1990, respectively. The first collection of sera was sent to Sweden in lyophilized form, the second directly as fresh unfrozen sera. A high proportion (7.1%) of the lyophilized sera reacted positively in the anti-HCV screening assay, but only seven (2.5%) were positive by the RIBA confirmatory test. In four of these sera HCV-RNA could be detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. In the second material of fresh sera six reacted positively in the screening anti-HCV ELISA, but only one was RIBA positive and four were RIBA indeterminate. None of these sera was positive for HCV-RNA. Thus, the overall prevalence of anti-HCV among the 503 Chinese blood donors, as identified by RIBA, was 1.6%, and of HCV-RNA by PCR 0.8%. The confirmed antibody prevalence is higher than reported from the Western world. Caution about using data from the screening ELISA only, especially if sera have been handled in an unorthodox way, is emphasized.     

Evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus seroprevalence in population surveys using pooled sera.

The pooling of individual serum samples to determine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositivity was examined to assess whether testing pooled sera was technically feasible, cost-effective, and accurate for estimating seroprevalence in large population surveys. The sensitivities and specificities of three commercially available HIV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were tested using 65 serum pools of 15 individual serum samples each (975 total serum samples) at two different dilutions. With pooled sera, the Organon Teknika Bio-EnzaBead ELISA at half the dilution recommended by the manufacturer showed the best agreement with ELISA and Western blot results of individual sera. In subsequently testing 92 pools, each containing 15 individual serum samples from a population of American patients attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic, the estimated seroprevalence was 5.27 compared with 4.93% in a test of 1,380 individual serum samples and 5.19% in a test of 4,028 individual serum samples from the same population. In an evaluation of 1,380 African patients using 10 serum samples per pool, the estimated seroprevalence was 5.79 compared with 6.16% in a test of individual sera. These results indicate that ELISA testing with pooled sera is highly sensitive and specific and appears to be a cost-effective means for estimating HIV seroprevalence in large population-based surveys.     

Prevalence of hepatitis C in tropical communities: the importance of confirmatory assays

The prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV) was estimated in 3 tropical populations using 2 screening ELISAs to detect antibody to the c100-3 antigen and 2 supplementary assays designed to test the specificity of these tests. Two hundred and eighty-six of 385 (74.2%) sera from Kiribati, 17 of 138 (12.3%) sera from Vanuatu, and 39 of 173 (22.5%) sera from Zaire were reactive in the initial screening assay. The proportion of reactive sera which were also reactive in the second screening ELISA varied between populations (55.1% in Kiribati, 85.1% in Vanuatu, and 39.2% from Zaire). Reactive sera were selected at random for confirmatory testing. Only 3 of 49 (6.12%) of sera from Kiribati and 1 of 14 (4.76%) of sera from Vanuatu positive in the initial ELISA were reactive in the confirmatory assays. The proportion of confirmed positive sera from Zaire was higher 8 of 28 (28.5%). Based on the results of these supplementary assays the estimated prevalence of anti-HCV in these populations is 4.8% in Kiribati, less than 1% in Vanuatu, and 6.4% in Zaire. Reliance on a single screening ELISA to estimate the prevalence of anti-HCV in stored sera from tropical communities may lead to a gross over-estimate of the true prevalence in these populations.     

Diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection using two second-generation enzyme immunoassays with a recombinant immunoblot assay for confirmation

A total of 1,016 serum samples from patients with either non-A, non-B hepatitis or risk factors for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were examined in two second-generation enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), the UBI HCV EIA (Organon Teknika, The Netherlands) and the Wellcozyme anti-HCV (Murex Diagnostics, UK), for detection of antibodies to HCV. An immunoblot assay that uses four recombinant antigens, the 4-RIBA (Chiron, USA), was used as a confirmatory assay. Of the 1,016 samples, 195 (19.2 %) were reactive in both EIAs, while ten yielded discrepant results. One hundred eighty of the 195 (92 %) positive reactions were confirmed in the 4-RIBA; 13 sera yielded an indeterminate result and two were negative. None of the sera with discrepant results reacted positively in the confirmatory test, while two sera showed an indeterminate pattern. In contrast to the screening of antibodies to HCV among blood donors, confirmatory testing of antibodies to HCV with the 4-RIBA seems to have limited added value in the diagnostic examination of clinical samples from patients with suspected HCV infection.     

Evaluation of a commercially available second-generation immunoglobulin G enzyme immunoassay for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection.

We evaluated a commercially available second-generation anti-H. pylori immunoglobulin G enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Cobas Core Anti-Helicobacter pylori EIA; Roche S. A., Basel, Switzerland) for serodiagnosis of H. pylori infection. The results of the assay were assessed in relation to the results of bacterial culture, urease testing, and histological Giemsa stain of gastric biopsy specimens from 1,134 patients with a variety of symptoms relating to the upper gastrointestinal tract. H. pylori was detected in biopsy specimens from 660 (58.2%) patients: 6 had a normal mucosa, 123 had chronic gastritis only, and 531 were found to have chronic active gastritis by histology; endoscopy showed duodenal and gastric ulcers in 137 and 64 patients of the last two groups, respectively. The test was evaluated with different age and ethnic groups. The prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, (i) for Belgian patients between 18 and 40 years old, 34, 93, 95, 91, and 96%; (ii) for Belgian patients more than 40 years old, 53, 96, 91, 93, and 95%; and (iii) the Mediterranean patients more than 17 years old, 87, 94, 70, 95, and 64%. All sera showing discordant immunoassay results compared with the results of histology and culture of biopsy specimens, as well as those with borderline immunoassay results, were tested further by immunoblotting. Among the EIA results considered false negative, we demonstrated an absence of seroconversion in 14 of 19 patients tested by immunoblotting. Among the EIA results considered false positive, immunoblotting showed the presence of specific antibodies in 28 of 37 patients tested. Among the borderline results obtained in the first assay with 22 patients' sera, a second assay showed positive results in 10 patients (8 were positive by immunoblotting) and negative reactions in 10 patients (9 were negative by immunoblotting), whereas 2 remained borderline. These data indicate that sera showing borderline immunoassay results must be tested again. In conclusion, this commercially available second-generation EIA, which is easy and quick to perform, was found highly reliable for the serodiagnosis of H. pylori infection.     

Comparison of two commercially available anti-HIV ELISAs: Abbott HTLV III EIA and Du Pont HTLV III-ELISA

Serum specimens were tested for HIV antibodies by two commercially available ELISAs (Abbott HTLV III EIA and Du Pont HTLV III-ELISA). The specificity and sensitivity of these assays were determined by comparison with indirect immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis. Specificity ranged from 94.3% in the Abbott assay to 97.9% in the Du Pont-ELISA. The sensitivity was 100% in the Abbott-ELISA and 99% in the Du Pont test. With both tests, false-positive results occurred predominantly in sera from patients with immunological disorders (kidney transplant recipients, lymphoma, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, etc.), whereas symptomatic AIDS-patients, patients with ARC, and persons with a defined risk for HIV infection could be diagnosed unequivocally. Specificity and sensitivity of anti-HIV ELISAs seemed to depend not only on definition of the cutoff value but also on other factors, such as antigen preparation and inactivation measures. Testing of ELISA-reactive sera by confirmatory tests remains necessary.