Weekly epoetin beta maintains haemoglobin levels and improves quality of life in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving chemotherapy

Objective: This study was aimed at investigating the effectiveness andsafety of once-weekly epoetin beta for anaemic cancer patientsreceiving chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 104 patients with a haemoglobin level of 11.0 g/dLwere enrolled. Patients received a once-weekly subcutaneousdose of 36 000 IU epoetin beta for 12 weeks. If the increasein the haemoglobin level was <1.0 g/dL after 6 weeks, ora red blood cell transfusion was required between days 15 and42, the dose of epoetin beta was increased to 54 000 IU fromthe subsequent week. The primary endpoint was the percentageof patients who achieved a haemoglobin increase of 2.0 g/dL;the haemoglobin response rate. Quality of life (QOL) was assessedusing the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anaemia (FACT-An)questionnaire. Results: The haemoglobin response rate was 66.3% among the 98 patients(breast cancer: n = 25; malignant lymphoma: n = 21; ovariancancer: n = 20; lung cancer: n = 15; other cancers: n = 17)assessable for a haemoglobin response. Thirty-nine patients(39.8%) required a dose escalation to 54 000 IU. At the endof the study, QOL assessable patients (n = 96) showed a meanimprovement in the FACT-An total fatigue subscale score (FSS)of 0.3 points from baseline. Patients with a haemoglobin responsehad a mean change in the total FSS of +3.2, compared with –3.4for patients without a haemoglobin response. No serious adverseevent of epoetin beta was observed. Conclusions: Epoetin beta administered at an initial dose of 36 000 IU once-weeklywas well tolerated, with increased haemoglobin levels and improvedQOL in anaemic cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.     

Benefits of epoetin alfa in anemic breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy often exhibit anemia, which contributes to symptoms such as fatigue, compromising quality of life (QOL). The present subset analysis assessed the effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO, epoetin alfa) on anemia and QOL in approximately 1300 patients with breast cancer, who were derived from 3 large, community-based clinical trials of epoetin alfa in anemic chemotherapy patients with various malignancies. Epoetin alfa effectively and safely corrected anemia and improved QOL scores on the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment, which measures energy, ability to perform daily activities, and QOL. Clinical, laboratory, and QOL improvements were qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those reported in the larger populations with various tumor types. The efficacy and safety of epoetin alfa did not vary according to dosing frequency (1 vs. 3 times weekly). Epoetin alfa is, therefore, effective and safe in the management of anemia in patients with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy.     

Maintaining normal hemoglobin levels with epoetin alfa in mainly nonanemic patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a survival study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect on survival and quality of life of maintaining hemoglobin (Hb) in the range of 12 to 14 g/dL with epoetin alfa versus placebo in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive epoetin alfa 40,000 U once weekly or placebo for 12 months. Study drug was initiated if baseline Hb was < or = 13 g/dL or when Hb decreased to < or = 13g/dL during the study. The primary end point was 12-month overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The study drug administration was stopped early in accordance with a recommendation from the Independent Data Monitoring Committee because of higher mortality in the group treated with epoetin alfa. Enrollment had been completed, with 939 patients enrolled (epoetin alfa, n = 469; placebo, n = 470). Most patients had Hb more than 12 g/dL at baseline (median Hb, 12.8 g/dL) or during the study. From the final analysis, 12-month OS was 70% for epoetin alfa recipients and 76% for placebo recipients (P = .01). Optimal tumor response and time to disease progression were similar between groups. The reason for the difference in mortality between groups could not be determined from additional subsequent analyses involving both study data and chart review. CONCLUSION: In this trial, the use of epoetin alfa to maintain high Hb targets in women with MBC, most of whom did not have anemia at the start of treatment, was associated with decreased survival. Additional research is required to clarify the potential impact of erythropoietic agents on survival when the Hb target range is 10 to 12 g/dL.     

Epoetin alfa therapy increases hemoglobin levels and improves quality of life in patients with cancer-related anemia who are not receiving chemotherapy and patients with anemia who are receiving chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QOL) changes with epoetin alfa therapy for anemia in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Anemic cancer patients were enrolled onto this prospective, open-label study from 34 centers across Canada. The trial had two cohorts: patients who were and were not receiving chemotherapy during the 16-week study. All patients initially received epoetin alfa 150 IU/kg subcutaneously three times per week. The dose was doubled after 4 weeks for patients who did not experience sufficient response. RESULTS: Of the 183 patients enrolled in the nonchemotherapy cohort, statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in QOL were observed with epoetin alfa therapy using both the FACT-An questionnaire and linear analog scale assessment. Hemoglobin levels increased significantly (P <.001; mean increase 2.5 g/dL from baseline to end of study) and these increases were positively correlated with improved QOL and change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores. There was a significant reduction in the percentage of patients who required blood transfusions. The 218 patients in the chemotherapy cohort also experienced significant improvements in QOL, decreased transfusion use, and increased hemoglobin levels that correlated with QOL improvements and change in ECOG scores. Epoetin alfa was well-tolerated in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Epoetin alfa administered to patients with cancer-related anemia for up to 16 weeks resulted in significantly improved QOL, increased hemoglobin levels, and decreased transfusion use. These benefits were observed in cancer patients who were not receiving chemotherapy as well as those who were.     

Improvement in quality of life for cancer patients treated with epoetin alfa

Anaemia is a common complication of cancer and cancer therapies, and fatigue is one of the most common symptoms of anaemia, disrupting functional performance and reducing overall quality of life. The positive effects of treating renal patients with recombinant human erythropoietin are well documented. This case report series details the specific effects of fatigue on individual patients with cancer and their way of life, and describes their significant improvement in lifestyle following the reversal of anaemia using recombinant human erythropoietin, epoetin alfa.     

Clinical benefits of once-weekly epoetin alfa in anemic patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy

In a large, 16-week, prospective study of 2,964 anemic patients with various cancers undergoing chemotherapy, once-weekly subcutaneous administration of 40,000 U of epoetin alfa,with potential escalation to 60,000 U, increased hemoglobin (Hgb) levels, decreased transfusion requirements, and improved quality of life (QOL) as assessed using the Linear Analog Scale Assessment (LASA) for energy, activity, and overall QOL and the Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) QOL instrument. A retrospective subset analysis conducted in 244 colorectal cancer patients enrolled in the study showed statistically significant improvements from baseline to final readings in LASA energy, activity, and overall QOL and FACT-An Anemia Symptoms and Fatigue subscale scores (P < 0.02). Moreover, patients who achieved larger improvements in Hgb levels also demonstrated greater percentage improvements in QOL over baseline measurements. Mean Hgb levels increased by 1.2 g/dL after 4 weeks of treatment and by 1.6 g/dL by study end, independent of red blood cell transfusion within 28 days prior to the Hgb assessment. Hematopoietic response (Hgb level > or = 12 g/dL and/or increase in Hgb level > or = 2 g/dL, independent of transfusion) was observed in 61% of patients (139/229). Additionally, the proportion of patients receiving transfusions decreased from 17% at baseline to 4% during the final month of therapy. Epoetin alfa was well tolerated, with no evidence of unexpected adverse events. Except for significantly higher QOL scores at baseline, results for the cohort of colorectal cancer patients were similar to those for patients with other cancer types in the main study population.     

Effects of epoetin alfa on hematologic parameters and quality of life in cancer patients receiving nonplatinum chemotherapy: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessed the effects of epoetin alfa on transfusion requirements, hematopoietic parameters, quality of life (QOL), and safety in anemic cancer patients receiving nonplatinum chemotherapy. The study also explored a possible relationship between increased hemoglobin and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-five patients with solid or nonmyeloid hematologic malignancies and hemoglobin levels < or = 10.5 g/dL, or greater than 10.5 g/dL but < or = 12.0 g/dL after a hemoglobin decrease of > or = 1.5 g/dL per cycle since starting chemotherapy, were randomized 2:1 to epoetin alfa 150 to 300 IU/kg (n = 251) or placebo (n = 124) three times per week subcutaneously for 12 to 24 weeks. The primary end point was proportion of patients transfused; secondary end points were change in hemoglobin and QOL. The protocol was amended before unblinding to prospectively collect and assess survival data 12 months after the last patient completed the study. RESULTS: Epoetin alfa, compared with placebo, significantly decreased transfusion requirements (P =.0057) and increased hemoglobin (P <.001). Improvement of all primary cancer- and anemia-specific QOL domains, including energy level, ability to do daily activities, and fatigue, was significantly (P <.01) greater for epoetin alfa versus placebo patients. Although the study was not powered for survival as an end point, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a trend in overall survival favoring epoetin alfa (P =.13, log-rank test), and Cox regression analysis showed an estimated hazards ratio of 1.309 (P =.052) favoring epoetin alfa. Adverse events were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Epoetin alfa safely and effectively ameliorates anemia and significantly improves QOL in cancer patients receiving nonplatinum chemotherapy. Encouraging results regarding increased survival warrant another trial designed to confirm these findings.     

Epoetin alfa corrects anemia and improves quality of life in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving non-platinum chemotherapy

Anemia, a commonly occurring morbidity in patients with cancer, often leads to diminished quality of life (QOL). Numerous clinical trials have shown that epoetin alfa treatment improves hematologic and QOL variables in cancer patients. The clinical trial analysis reported here was performed to assess response to epoetin alfa in patients with hematologic malignancies. Cancer patients with anemia undergoing non-platinum-based chemotherapy who were enrolled in a multinational, randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were prospectively stratified by tumor type (hematologic, solid). Efficacy endpoints included proportion of patients transfused after day 28; change in hemoglobin (Hb) level from baseline to last assessment; proportion of treatment responders (increase in Hb > or =2 g/dl unrelated to transfusion) and correctors (patients whose Hb levels reached > or =12 g/dl during the study); and QOL. The protocol was amended before unblinding to prospectively collect and assess survival data 12 months after the last patient completed the study, and survival for the full study cohort was estimated using Kaplan-Meier techniques. Efficacy analyses of hematologic and QOL variables, as well as Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival, were performed post hoc for the hematologic tumor stratum. Among patients with hematologic malignancies, the mean increase in Hb levels was greater with epoetin alfa than with placebo treatment (2.2 vs. 0.3 g/dl). Transfusion requirements were lower in patients who received epoetin alfa versus placebo (25.2 vs. 43.1%), and the proportion of responders and correctors was higher with epoetin alfa than with placebo (75.2 vs. 16.7% and 72.6 vs. 14.8%, respectively). Patients who received epoetin alfa had improved QOL while patients who received placebo had decreased QOL. These results are similar to those seen in the full study cohort, where differences between epoetin alfa and placebo were significant (P<0.05) for all five primary cancer- and anemia-specific QOL domains evaluated. Although the study was not powered for survival, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a trend in overall survival favoring epoetin alfa in both the full study cohort and the hematologic subgroup. Epoetin alfa treatment was well tolerated. Epoetin alfa therapy increased Hb levels, reduced transfusion requirements, and improved QOL in patients with anemia undergoing non-platinum chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies.     

Effects of epoetin alfa on cognitive function,mood, asthenia,and quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy

Several recently published studies describe moderate to severe cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer survivors who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy 1-5 years before undergoing extensive neuropsychological testing. While these studies are hypothesis-generating and preliminary given their small size and retrospective nature, they consistently suggest that between approximately 15% and 25% of chemotherapy-treated breast cancer patients will have evidence of cognitive dysfunction some years after chemotherapy, compared to about 10% of breast cancer survivors who did not receive chemotherapy. Recent preclinical data strongly suggest that erythropoetin is a potent, endogenous neuroprotective agent that prevents neuronal apoptosis from a variety of insults including hypoxia, trauma, subarachnoidal hemorrhage, and encephalitis. Erythropoietin also appears to enhance learning in a mouse spatial learning maze model. We have conducted a pilot study of epoetin alfa versus placebo in early-stage breast cancer patients who received standard adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy to determine the feasibility of administering standardized neurocognitive assessment tests in the oncology practice setting in order to understand whether the Executive Interview 25 test can detect the subtle cognitive impairment in verbal fluency, attention, and short-term memory observed with chemotherapy, and to assess whether epoetin alfa-treated patients have less evidence of cognitive dysfunction during and 6 months after chemotherapy compared with control-treated patients. We report here the preliminary results of this pilot clinical trial.     

Assessing the clinical significance of health-related quality of life (HrQOL) improvements in anaemic cancer patients receiving epoetin alfa

Health-related quality of life (HrQOL) assessments are gaining importance as outcome measures in cancer clinical trials. A recently published clinical trial reported statistically significant (P<0.001) increases in haemoglobin (Hb) levels and significantly (P<0.01) increased HrQOL scores following the administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO, epoetin alfa) versus placebo to anaemic cancer patients who received non-platinum chemotherapy. This study employed five cancer-specific HrQOL instruments. Hb and HrQOL data from this trial were analysed to estimate the minimally important difference (MID) in HrQOL measures that could be interpreted as clinically meaningful, with Hb level selected as the best external standard. Patients were assigned to two groups: improved (Hb increases of >/=1 g/dL) or stable (change in Hb of-1 g/dL to <1 g/dL). The MID was first determined as the difference between the mean changes in HrQOL in the improved group versus the stable group. By this analysis, the differences in HrQOL scores between the epoetin alfa group and the placebo group were clinically important for all Hb-sensitive, cancer-specific HrQOL evaluations. Linear regression analyses performed to provide estimates of the MID for specific values of Hb change confirmed that the differences in HrQOL scores between patient groups were clinically significant. These analyses were repeated using a data set from a separate clinical trial, which further supported the conclusion that observed HrQOL changes demonstrated in the multicentre, double-blind study were clinically important. These methods provide one means for interpreting the clinical relevance of changes in HrQOL evaluated in clinical trials.     

Effectiveness and safety of an induction therapy with epoetin alfa in anemic cancer patients receiving concomitant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Epoetin alfa, administered at standard dosages of 10,000-20,000 IU three times weekly or 40,000-60,000 IU once weekly, has been shown to significantly increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels, decrease transfusion requirements, and improve quality-of-life parameters in patients undergoing chemotherapy.Objective. This open-label, nonrandomized, historically controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an induction dose of epoetin alfa in patients with moderate or severe anemia who were receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: Nineteen patients with solid tumors and Hb levels < 9.0 g/dl were enrolled. The patients received single s.c. injections of epoetin alfa, 40,000 IU, on study days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13, and were then observed for the following 30 days. Nineteen other cancer patients who had matching characteristics and had received epoetin alfa, 10,000 IU, three times weekly for the 45-day study period, served as historical controls. The primary efficacy variable was change in Hb level from baseline to days 15 (approximately week 2) and 45 (approximately week 6.5). Secondary efficacy variables included the percent response (Hb increase > or = 1 g/dl) and percent major response (Hb increase > or = 2 g/dl) at days 15 and 45, the durations of response and major response after day 45, the proportion of patients transfused within the 45 study days, the changes in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score at days 15 and 45, and the ability to maintain the planned chemotherapy dose (dose intensity) over the 45-day study. RESULTS: Mean increases in Hb level in the epoetin alfa 40,000 IU group were significantly greater than those in the historical control group both at day 15 and at day 45. The increase in Hb level in the control group approximated increases reported with standard 3-times-weekly epoetin alfa at day 15 but was somewhat lower than the increases typically seen by day 45, presumably due to the fact that, in the present study, the epoetin alfa dose was not doubled in initial nonresponders, as is commonly done with standard epoetin alfa treatment. The rates of major response for epoetin alfa 40,000 IU patients (37% at day 15 and 84% at day 45) were higher than those for control patients (16% and 21%, respectively). Also, the transfusion rate was lower and performance status scores were better in the epoetin alfa 40,000 IU patients than in the control patients. In all, 74% of epoetin alfa 40,000 IU patients versus 47% of control patients received 100% of the planned chemotherapy dose. Epoetin alfa was well tolerated in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that epoetin alfa at a dose of 40,000 IU administered five times over 2 weeks may confer even higher response rates than those seen with standard dosing regimens. These encouraging results support further study of the proposed induction dose of epoetin alfa in a larger, randomized, prospectively controlled trial.     

Clinical evaluation of once-weekly dosing of epoetin alfa in chemotherapy patients: improvements in hemoglobin and quality of life are similar to three-times-weekly dosing.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and clinical benefits of once-weekly epoetin alfa therapy as an adjunct to chemotherapy in anemic cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 3,012 patients with nonmyeloid malignancies who received chemotherapy were enrolled onto this multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized study conducted in 600 United States community-based practices. Patients received epoetin alfa 40,000 U once weekly, which could be increased to 60,000 U once weekly after 4 weeks dependent on hemoglobin response. Treatment was continued for a maximum of 16 weeks. RESULTS: Among the 2,964 patients assessable for efficacy, epoetin alfa therapy resulted in significant increases in hemoglobin levels, decreases in transfusion requirements, and improvements in functional status and fatigue as assessed by the linear analog scale assessment (energy level, ability to perform daily activities, and overall quality of life) and the anemia subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia questionnaire. Improvements in quality-of-life parameters correlated significantly (P <.001) with increased hemoglobin levels. The direct relationship between hemoglobin and quality-of-life improvement was sustained during the 16-week study period, which is similar to findings of large community-based trials of three-times-weekly dosing. Once-weekly epoetin alfa was well tolerated, with most adverse events attributed to the underlying disease or concomitant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The results from this large, prospective, community-based trial suggest that once-weekly epoetin alfa therapy increases hemoglobin levels, decreases transfusion requirements, and improves quality of life in patients with cancer and anemia who undergo concomitant chemotherapy. Based on the results of this study, the clinical benefits and the adverse event profile of once-weekly epoetin alfa therapy in community-based practice are similar to those observed in the historical experience with the three-times-weekly dosage schedule.     

Intravenous ferric gluconate significantly improves response to epoetin alfa versus oral iron or no iron in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) sodium ferric gluconate complex (FG), oral ferrous sulfate, or no iron to increase hemoglobin (Hb) in anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and epoetin alfa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter trial, 187 patients with chemotherapy-related anemia (Hb <11 g/dl; serum ferritin > or =100 ng/ml or transferrin saturation > or =15%) scheduled to receive chemotherapy and epoetin alfa (40,000 U subcutaneously weekly) were randomized to 8 weeks of 125 mg of IV FG weekly, 325 mg of oral ferrous sulfate three times daily, or no iron. The primary outcome was a change in Hb from baseline to endpoint, first whole-blood or red blood cell transfusion, or study withdrawal. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients were evaluable for efficacy (FG, n = 41; oral iron, n = 44; no iron, n = 44). Mean increase in Hb was 2.4 g/dl (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-2.7) for FG (p = .0092 vs. oral iron; p = .0044 vs. no iron), 1.6 g/dl (95% CI, 1.1-2.1) for oral iron (p =.7695 vs. no iron), and 1.5 g/dl (95% CI, 1.1-1.9) for no iron. Hb response (increase > or =2 g/dl) was 73% for FG (p = .0099 vs. oral iron; p = .0029 vs. no iron), 46% for oral iron (p = .6687 vs. no iron), and 41% for no iron. FG was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: For cancer patients with chemotherapy-related anemia receiving epoetin alfa, FG produces a significantly greater increase in Hb and Hb response compared with oral iron or no iron, supporting more aggressive treatment with IV iron supplementation for these patients.     

Efficacy of epoetin alfa in a retrospective non-stratified subgroup analysis of a breast cancer cohort receiving non-platinum chemotherapy

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: More than 60% of patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving non-platinum-based chemotherapy experience anemia, which is associated with fatigue and impaired quality of life. Epoetin alfa treatment in patients with a variety of malignancies has been shown to decrease transfusion requirements and improve hemoglobin levels and quality-of-life efficacy parameters. PATIENTS: Retrospective subgroup analyses were performed in patients with breast cancer who were part of a multinational, randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of anemic cancer patients (n = 375) undergoing non-platinum-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: In the breast cancer subpopulation (n = 114, 48% with stage IV disease at baseline), the hemoglobin increase was greater for epoetin alfa patients than placebo patients (2.3 versus 0.9 g/dL). Epoetin alfa patients had lower transfusion requirements (28.2% versus 33.3%), improvement or preservation versus deterioration of quality of life, and a higher proportion of responders (patients achieving a > or = 2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin levels unrelated to transfusion) (68.0% versus 22.9% for placebo). The results were similar to those observed in the full study cohort, where statistical analyses showed the differences to be significant (P <0.05 for all). Epoetin alfa treatment was well tolerated. Although the study was not designed or powered for survival as an endpoint, Kaplan-Meier estimates for the full cohort showed a trend in overall survival favoring epoetin alfa treatment (P = 0.13, log rank test); a similar benefit was seen in the breast cancer subpopulation. CONCLUSIONS: In the full study cohort and the breast cancer subpopulation, epoetin alfa effectively treated anemia (increased hemoglobin levels and decreased transfusion requirements) and improved or preserved quality of life. Results concerning potential survival benefits support further study of epoetin alfa in anemic cancer patients.     

Weekly epoetin alfa treatment of anemia in patients with cancer not undergoing therapy

Epoetin alfa is an established treatment of anemia in patients with cancer who are receiving chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. However, fewer data support its use in patients with cancer not currently receiving either therapy. This 16-week, open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter pilot study evaluated the clinical profile of epoetin alfa (40,000 U) administered weekly via subcutaneous injection in anemic patients with cancer not receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a minor (hemoglobin [Hgb] increase > or = 1-1.9 g/dL) or major (Hgb increase > or = 2 g/dL) hematologic response. The trial was temporarily suspended to amend the protocol to reflect updated package insert recommendations for target Hgb and dose adjustments. Of the 98 patients enrolled, 91 (mean age, 69.5 +/- 9.5 years; baseline Hgb level, 10.4 +/- 0.7 g/dL) were evaluated for efficacy in a modified intent-to-treat analysis. Nearly all patients (94.5% [86/91]) achieved a minor response, and the majority (80.2% [73/91]) achieved a major hematologic response at any time during the study. Mean Hgb levels increased steadily over the 12-week dosing period, with significant (P < 0.001) increases from baseline observed as early as week 2. Only one patient required a transfusion. Epoetin alfa was safe and well tolerated.