Unilateral hearing loss: benefits and satisfaction from the use of hearing aids

Aunilateral hearing loss is characterized by reduced hearing in one ear. The problems caused by sensory deprivation can be minimized with the use of hearing aids (HA).AimTo analyze the correlation between the prescribed grain and the insertion gain difference and with the results obtained regarding the benefit and satisfaction with the use of hearing aids in unilateral hearing impaired patients.Materials and MethodsProspective study with 15 subjects, mean age of 41.6 years, of both genders, users of hearing aids effectively. We used the International Questionnaire Results for hearing aids (International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids - IOI-HA), measured with a probe microphone.ResultsThe mean values in the analyses of the IOI-HA per item were positive and higher than four points. In relation to the objective measures, the frequencies in which we obtained the gain values which were closer to the target were: 1K Hz, 2K Hz and 500 Hz, respectively.ConclusionThe satisfaction of individuals using hearing aid unilaterally is not completely correlated to the prescribed gain, because even if the target is not being reached in some frequencies, the individuals were pleased as to the use of their hearing aids.     

An investigation into hearing loss among patients of 50 years or older

Objects To investigate the extent of hearing loss in an elderly sample population to estimate hearing disorders among the age-equivalent population in China and to study primary clinical characteristic...     

Auditory Rehabilitation Effects on Speech Lateralization in Hearing-impaired Listeners

Objective—Previous studies reported that the consequences of auditory rehabilitation were lateralized, with the right ear (RE) showing more improvement than the left ear (LE) over the time course of hearing aid (HA) use in elderly patients with symmetrical presbyacusis. It has been suggested that this asymmetry is linked to a change in speech lateralization. The aim of this study was to explore the consequences of HA use on interaural asymmetry in symmetrical sensorineural hearing impairment patients before and 4 months after binaural HA fitting. Material and Methods—Two types of perceptual task were chosen in order to measure speech lateralization: two dichotic listening tasks; and an identification task for a voice onset time continuum. Seven elderly, right-handed patients suffering from symmetrical presbyacusis were selected and tested before HA fitting and 4 months after. All measurements were made without the use of the HA, and the listeners were all first-time HA wearers. Results—Dichotic listening scores for words improved significantly over the course of HA use. Moreover, the dichotic listening task for syllables revealed an increase in auditory asymmetry after 4 months of HA use. Concerning the identification task, a significant difference between ears was found, with only the RE showing significant improvement with HA use. Conclusion—These results suggest that auditory rehabilitation is lateralized, with greater change as a result of HA use occurring in the RE than the LE in right-handed patients.     

Natural history of contralateral residual hearing in binaural-bimodal hearing

Conclusions. The range of evaluation tools used in deciding which ear to implant and which to designate for a hearing aid (HA) should be expanded to include additional aspects to those tested by audiometry and basic speech perception. Residual hearing in non-implanted ears remains stable for at least 3 years after unilateral cochlear implantation, but regular refitting and monitoring of the HA function combined with cochlear implant (CI) mapping are mandatory for maximizing benefit from binaural-bimodal hearing. Objectives. To examine whether the clinical decision-making tools currently used to assess hearing are reliable guides when choosing the preferred ear for CI, and to determine the rate of residual hearing deterioration in the non-implanted ear over 36 months post-CI as a guide to recommending subsequent continued use of a contralateral HA as opposed to CI. Patients and methods. This was a retrospective evaluation of patients’ charts. The pre-CI choice of the ear for implantation in a group of 37 binaural-bimodal users was re-evaluated. In a second group of 22 patients, residual hearing deterioration was followed for 36 months post-implantation. Results. In the group of 37 patients, subjective identification of the worse-hearing ear was in agreement with audiometric results in 28 cases, but disagreed with the unaided audiometric results in the other 9. Mean threshold values for the group of 22 patients remained stable over 36 months post-CI, except for the aided threshold at 4.0kHz, which deteriorated by 10.9dB (p=0.003).     

Pop-rock musicians: Assessment of their satisfaction provided by hearing protectors

Pop-rock musicians are at risk of developing hearing loss and other symptoms related to amplified music.AimThe aim of the present study was to assess the satisfaction provided by the use of hearing protection in pop-rock musicians. Study design: Contemporary cohort study.Materials and MethodsA study of 23 male pop-rock musicians, aged between 25 to 45 years. After audiological evaluation (pure tone audiometry, middle ear analysis, TEOAE and DPOAE) hearing protective devices were provided to be used for three months. After that musicians answered a satisfaction assessment questionnaire.ResultsThe prevalence of hearing loss was of 21.7%. The most common complaints about the hearing protectors were: autophonia, pressure in the ears, interference in high frequencies perception and full time use of the hearing protector during concerts. There was a positive correlation between a reduction in tinnitus after the use of the HPD with the following complaints: tinnitus after beginning the career (p= 0.044), discomfort with the sound intensity in the work place (p= 0.009) and intolerance to loud sound (p= 0.029).ConclusionsThere was a high prevalence of hearing loss and a positive tendency towards the use of the ear protector device among the sample population.     

Audiological characteristics of the contralateral ear in patients with unilateral physical non-explosive ear trauma

ObjectivesTo document the frequency of occurrence and types of symptoms experienced in the contralateral ear in patients with unilateral physical non-explosive (UPN) ear trauma and to compare the audiometric and tympanometric parameters between asymptomatic and symptomatic contralateral ears.DesignProspective analytical clinical study Setting: Specialized (Ear, Nose, and Throat) clinic of a tertiary health institution. Participants: Patients with UPN ear trauma who presented within the first week of the incident. Main outcome measures: Otologic symptoms in the contralateral ear in UPN ear traumaResultsEighteen out of 53 patients (34.0%) experienced symptoms in the contralateral ear. The symptoms were tinnitus in 77.8% (14/18), hearing loss in 66.7% (12/18), and ear blockage in 27.8% (5/18). There was hearing loss in 38/53 (71.7%) of contralateral ears. Hearing loss type and PTAv at the low frequencies were not significantly different (p=0.142), but other audiometric parameters were significantly different between asymptomatic and symptomatic contralateral ears (p<0.05 in all). Type C tympanogram was more prominent in the symptomatic contralateral ear. There was a statistically-significant difference in the type of tympanogram between the two categories of patients (p=0.018). There was no difference in acoustic reflex between the two categories of patients (p=0.095).ConclusionsThe contralateral ear may be affected in up to one-third of patients with UPN ear trauma, and experience otologic symptoms similar to those of the traumatized ears. Audiologic and audiometric parameters were abnormal in most of the contralateral ears. The two ears must be assessed thoroughly in cases of UPN ear trauma.     

Sound pressure level generated by individual portable sound equipment

IntroductionThe use of Personal Digital Audio Players can cause hearing injuries, as the sound is generated directly in the ear canal. It is believed that different types of headphones can cause different amplifications, since they cause changes in the volume and resonance of the ear canal according to their depth.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the sound pressure to which young individuals are exposed when using Personal Digital Audio Players with two types of headphones: insertion earphones and anatomical insertion earphonesMaterials and methodsThis was an experimental study. The probe microphone measurements were made with different headphones in 54 ears (27 young individuals). The resonance peaks were also recorded.ResultsA statistically significant difference was observed between the evaluated headphones, showing that anatomical insertion earphones had higher levels of sound pressure than insertion earphones for all frequencies measured. There was no correlation between the resonance peak of the closed canal and the frequency where the highest sound pressure level was obtained. There was a significant difference between ears at some frequencies with the different headphones.ConclusionIt was concluded that anatomical insertion earphones generate a higher sound pressure level than insertion earphones.© 2014 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.     

Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The study tested the hypothesis that among patients with similar levels of residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear, speech perception outcome is the same whether or not the implanted ear has profound or severe levels of hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. METHODS: Levels of hearing loss in postlingually deafened adults who had cochlear implantation at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, MD) between 1991 and 2002 were classified according to pure-tone averages as bilateral severe (n = 20), severe-profound (severe in one ear and profound in the other) (n = 23), and bilateral profound (n = 43). There was no significant difference in the age at onset and duration of deafness among the three patient groups. Individuals in the bilateral severe and severe-profound groups had comparable levels of severe hearing loss in their nonimplanted ears, whereas those in severe-profound and bilateral profound groups had comparable levels of profound hearing loss in their implanted ears. Speech perception performance was evaluated using words from the Consonant Nucleus Consonant word list, Hearing in Noise Test sentences in quiet, and Central Institute for the Deaf sentences through recorded presentation at 70 dB sound pressure level (SPL). RESULTS: Despite the profound hearing loss of the implanted ear in the asymmetrical group, there was no significant difference in mean speech perception scores compared with the bilateral severe group within the first year after implant surgery. By comparison, the bilateral profound group had lower speech perception results compared with patients with residual hearing in one or both ears. CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that implantation of the profoundly deafened ear does not diminish the functional advantage conferred by residual hearing in a patient with asymmetrical hearing loss. Therefore, the central auditory pathway may be the site at which persistent auditory function has its most beneficial effects.     

Electric-acoustic stimulation with longer electrodes for potential deterioration in low-frequency hearing

Abstract

Background: Electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) has emerged as a standard treatment for patients with high-frequency hearing loss. EAS is usually performed with shorter electrodes of 16–24?mm in length. As most EAS recipients gradually lose residual acoustic hearing in the implanted ear over time, EAS with longer electrodes without causing significant intra-cochlear damage might be ideal.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate hearing preservation (HP) results after EAS surgery with longer electrodes.

Methods: Ten patients (11 ears) with partial deafness that met the indications for EAS with a MED-EL FLEX28 electrode were included in this study. Auditory thresholds before and at 6?months after activation were examined.

Results: In 100% of cases, HP was comfortably achieved, indicating that all patients could utilize acoustic amplification combined with electric stimulation.

Conclusion: EAS with longer electrodes can offer broader cochlear coverage, resulting in natural frequency matching in comparison with shorter electrodes, even in EAS cases. The combination of advanced surgical techniques and flexible, long, straight electrodes permits deep insertion that reaches the apical region with little or no insertion trauma.     

Probe tube systems: effects of equalization on real ear insertion and aided gain.

In probe tube measures, the method used to equalize the sound field will determine the reference value used in calculating real ear insertion gain (REIG) and real ear aided gain (REAG). Several equalization methods are available with current probe tube systems. This study determined the effects of three equalization methods (substitution, modified comparison, and ipsilateral comparison) on REIG and REAG measures using open and closed earmolds for ear canals varying in circumference. Twelve subjects were selected representing a wide range of ear canal circumferences. Results revealed significant differences for REIG and REAG among the three equalization methods. These differences appear to be due to the different acoustic components included or excluded for each method. The results of this study suggest that the sound field equalization method used for probe tube measures needs to be considered when interpreting the hearing aid gain reported among various probe microphone units. Also, canal circumference may be a quick method for categorizing canal cavity size and appears to influence measured hearing aid gain.     

Factors influencing degree of hearing loss at presentation,hearing aid choice,and usage in first time hearing aid users in Singapore

Abstract

Objective: To examine the factors associated with late presentation at first hearing aid (HA) fitting, HA choice and usage among users in Singapore.

Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Study sample: 1068 subjects issued with HAs at a tertiary hospital from 2001 to 2013.

Results: Half of the subjects presented with more severe (>55?dB) hearing loss (HL) in their better ear. In multivariable analysis, older age, Malay ethnicity, conductive and mixed HL, and combination type of HL were associated with more severe HL at first presentation. Over 70% of subjects were older than 65 years. Worse pure tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds of the better ear, gradual onset and sensorineural HL were associated with older age presentation. For unilaterally fitted subjects, PTA thresholds were the only determinant of having the better ear aided. Better PTA thresholds, younger age and sensorineural HL were associated with choosing in ear compared to behind the ear HAs. Younger age and worse PTA of the better ear were associated with ≥4?h of daily HA usage.

Conclusions: Age, ethnicity and type of HL were important determinants for more severe HL at first HA fitting. Older patients and those with better hearing were less likely to use their HAs regularly.     

An evaluation of the Sennheiser HDA 280-CL circumaural headphone for use in audiometric testing

Objective: Evaluation of the Sennheiser HDA 280-CL circumaural headphone for the determination of (1) equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) for 125–18,000?Hz.; (2) real ear attenuation (250–8000?Hz); (3) insertion loss (63–18,000?Hz); (4) frequency response (125–18,000?Hz); (5) total harmonic distortion (THD) (125–10,000?Hz); and, (6) linearity (11,200–18,000?Hz).Study Sample: Twenty-five normal hearing adults aged 18–25 participated in (1) and (2).Design: (1) Hearing thresholds were measured using the Sennheiser HDA 280-CL. Frequency specific ETSPL values were calculated in an artificial ear. (2) Sound field thresholds were measured with the ears open and covered with the headphone to obtain the real ear attenuation thresholds (REAT). These values were used to determine the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANL). (3) A B&;K HATS mannequin recorded the output levels of a broadband pink noise with the ears open and covered with the headphones. (4, 5) The frequency response, THD and linearity were measured in an artificial ear.Results: Values for ETSPL, REAT, MPANL, insertion loss, as well as measures of frequency response, THD and linearity are presented.Conclusions: The Sennheiser HDA 280-CL meets the requirements for audiometric testing and the values presented can be used for calibration.     

Frequency-dependent loudness balancing in bimodal cochlear implant users

Conclusion In users of a cochlear implant (CI) and a hearing aid (HA) in contralateral ears, frequency-dependent loudness balancing between devices did, on average, not lead to improved speech understanding as compared to broadband balancing. However, nine out of 15 bimodal subjects showed significantly better speech understanding with either one of the fittings. Objectives Sub-optimal fittings and mismatches in loudness are possible explanations for the large individual differences seen in listeners using bimodal stimulation. Methods HA gain was adjusted for soft and loud input sounds in three frequency bands (0–548, 548–1000, and?>1000?Hz) to match loudness with the CI. This procedure was compared to a simple broadband balancing procedure that reflected current clinical practice. In a three-visit cross-over design with 4 weeks between sessions, speech understanding was tested in quiet and in noise and questionnaires were administered to assess benefit in real world. Results Both procedures resulted in comparable HA gains. For speech in noise, a marginal bimodal benefit of 0.3?±?4?dB was found, with large differences between subjects and spatial configurations. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise did not differ between the two loudness balancing procedures.     

Referral rates of postlingually deafened adult hearing aid users for a cochlear implant candidacy assessment

Objective: The aims of this study were: to investigate the referral rates of postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant (CI) candidates from a hearing aid (HA) clinic for a CI candidacy assessment and to gain insight about factors influencing the referral pathways to CI assessments. Design: Two methodologies were used: a retrospective cohort study reviewing clinical files and a questionnaire to clinicians. Study sample: The files of 1249 adult clients from the HA clinic who had average puretone hearing thresholds greater or equal to 65?dB?HL in the better hearing ear and unaided phoneme recognition scores of less than 50% in both ears were reviewed. All of the clinicians completed the online questionnaire. Results: Eighteen adults met the CI candidacy criteria, of whom 16 (89%) had a CI discussion with their audiologist, with 11 (61%) being referred for a CI evaluation. Of these 11, four proceeded to implantation. Questionnaire responses revealed the need for better information on candidacy and referral guidelines for HA audiologists, in addition to enhanced communication between HA and CI clinics. Conclusions: Overall the results indicate that the referral pathway to obtain a CI assessment is a barrier contributing to the low CI penetration rate in adults.     

Contribution of hearing aids to music perception by cochlear implant users

Abstract

Objectives

Modern cochlear implant (CI) encoding strategies represent the temporal envelope of sounds well but provide limited spectral information. This deficit in spectral information has been implicated as a contributing factor to difficulty with speech perception in noisy conditions, discriminating between talkers and melody recognition. One way to supplement spectral information for CI users is by fitting a hearing aid (HA) to the non-implanted ear.

Methods

In this study 14 postlingually deaf adults (half with a unilateral CI and the other half with a CI and an HA (CI + HA)) were tested on measures of music perception and familiar melody recognition.

Results

CI + HA listeners performed significantly better than CI-only listeners on all pitch-based music perception tasks. The CI + HA group did not perform significantly better than the CI-only group in the two tasks that relied on duration cues. Recognition of familiar melodies was significantly enhanced for the group wearing an HA in addition to their CI. This advantage in melody recognition was increased when melodic sequences were presented with the addition of harmony.

Conclusion

These results show that, for CI recipients with aidable hearing in the non-implanted ear, using a HA in addition to their implant improves perception of musical pitch and recognition of real-world melodies.     

三个预选公式在聋儿助听器验配中的效果评价

目的探索出适合聋儿的助听器预选公式。方法对重度和极度感音神经性聋的１５例（３０耳）患儿应用ＮＡＬ－Ｒ、Ｂｅｒｇｅｒ、１／３增益公式，进行了助听器验配，并对不同频率上的目标增益值、真耳介入增益值、助听前后的声场阈值方面进行了比较；探索适合于这类患者的最佳预选公式。结果１各公式助听前后的声场阈值之间有显著性差异（Ｐ＜０．０１），经预选公式验配后有不同程度的助听效果；２助听效果最好的是Ｂｅｒｇｅｒ公式，助听效果最差的是１／３增益公式。结论虽然助听效果最好的是Ｂｅｒｇｅｒ公式，但是还应强调个体化。     

Dichotic sentence identification test in Portuguese: a study in young adults

IntroductionAmong the currently-applied auditory processing tests, dichotic listening tests have been widely used, since they allow investigating the hemispheric and inter-hemispheric function and their respective skills to process the received auditory information.ObjectiveTo obtain normality reference measures with the new dichotic sentence identification test in right-handed adults with normal hearing.MethodsQuantitative, observational, cross-sectional study. 72 subjects were assessed, aged 19–44 years, right-handed, with normal hearing, without hearing complaints. The dichotic sentence identification test consists of different lists of sentences, which were combined two by two and presented at the same time, using earphones in both ears, at 50 dB Sensation Level. The test was applied in four stages: training of the 3 stages, free attention, right and left directed attention, thus evaluating different auditory skills.ResultsIn the free attention task, the average percentage of correct answers in the right ear was 93.59% and in the left ear 86.06%, with a statistically significant difference between the ears, with an advantage for the right ear. In the directed attention task, the average percentage of correct answers was 99.37% in the right ear and 98.8% in the left ear, with no statistical difference between the ears.ConclusionIt is suggested, as a normality reference for the stage of free attention, 90%–100% for correct answers for the right ear and for the left ear, from 80% to 100%. When there is asymmetry between the ears, differences of up to 20% are expected, with an advantage for the right ear For the directed attention stage, the expected normality reference values ??are 100% for the right ear and for the left ear, with no asymmetry between the ears; however, if it occurs, a difference of 10% is expected between the ears, with an advantage for the right ear.     

Quality of life in persons with hearing loss: a study of patients referred to an audiological service

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the relationship between hearing loss (HL) and general quality of life (QoL) in adults seeking hearing aids (HAs).

Design: The patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire’s general part and a questionnaire measuring self-assessed communication ability (Abbreviated Profile of hearing Aid Benefit—APHAB). These responses were compared with EORTC scores from a general population and patients with former head and neck cancer.

Study sample: One-hundred and fifty-eight adults with HL were recruited prior to hearing aid (HA) fitting with one half seeking renewal of their HA.

Results: General QoL scores among patients with HL were similar to those in the general population, but higher than in many chronic serious diseases. Patients with unilateral HL reported slightly worse social function and more fatigue than patients with bilateral HL. Self-assessed communication ability correlated with general QoL scores. Also, we found that best ear pure tone average (PTA), cognitive and physical QoL function predicted APHAB scores.

Conclusion: In the investigated HL group, general QoL scores seem to be relatively close to those seen in the general population.     

Hearing and ear status of Pacific children aged 11 years living in New Zealand: the Pacific Islands families hearing study

Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of hearing loss and ear problems in Pacific children, and investigate current and past demographic, health and social factors potentially associated with hearing and ear problems.

Design: A cross-sectional observational study design nested within a birth cohort was employed.

Study sample: Nine-hundred-twenty Pacific children aged 11?years were audiologically assessed. Using average hearing thresholds at 500, 1k and 2k Hz, 162 (18%) right and 197 (21%) left ears had ≥20?dB hearing loss. Hearing loss was mild (20–39?dB) in most cases; 2% of ears had moderate to moderate-severe (40–69?dB) hearing loss. However, only 101 (11%) children had normal peripheral hearing defined by passing hearing threshold, tympanogram and distortion product otoacoustic emission assessments. Those with confirmed middle ear disease at age 2?years had significantly increased odds of a non-Type A tympanogram (adjusted odds ratio: 2.00; 95% confidence interval: 1.56, 2.50) when re-assessed at age 11?years.

Conclusions: Hearing loss, abnormal tympanograms, and auditory processing difficulties were present in many Pacific children. Interventions are also urgently needed to mitigate the effect of the longstanding ear disease likely to be present for many Pacific children.