Commercial latex test for Clostridium difficile toxin A does not detect toxin A.

The rapid latex test recently marketed by Marion Scientific (Div. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Kansas City, Mo.) for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A does not react with the toxin, based on the following findings: culture filtrates from nontoxigenic strains of C. difficile gave positive reactions in the test, culture filtrate in which toxin A had been removed gave positive reactions, purified toxin A did not react in the test, and the latex reagent bound an antigen which is distinct from toxin A and which is produced in various amounts by both toxigenic and nontoxigenic strains of C. difficile.     

Development of a rapid enzyme immunoassay for Clostridium difficile toxin A and its use in the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated disease.

A rapid (2.5 h) direct enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for Clostridium difficile toxin A was developed for clinical use. Specimen centrifugation and filtration were not required. The EIA detected toxin A levels in patient stool as low as 20 pg (2 ng/ml of stool). The test was 5,000 times more sensitive for toxin A than it was for toxin B and did not react with a panel of other bacterial species with the exception of one highly toxigenic strain of Clostridium sordellii. The EIA was compared with the cytotoxin assay, culture of toxigenic C. difficile (toxigenic culture), and latex agglutination by using 313 fresh stool specimens submitted from patients with suspected C. difficile-associated disease. Results read visually and with a plate reader were similar. Sixty-two specimens were positive by one or more tests, but only 22 (35%) were positive by all four laboratory methods. The EIA was 84.1% sensitive and 98.9% specific when it was compared with the cytotoxin assay. The use of toxigenic culture to referee discrepant results (EIA versus cytotoxin assay) showed the EIA sensitivity and specificity to be 95.1 and 99.3%, respectively, with respect to other laboratory methods. Patient charts were reviewed for antibiotic-associated diarrhea on 108 specimens, including all those that were positive by at least one test method. Of 34 patients determined to have C. difficile-associated disease, 29 (85.3%) were positive by EIA, 32 (94.1%) were positive by the cytotoxin assay, 27 (79.4%) were positive by toxigenic culture, and 20 (58.8%) were positive by latex agglutination. Seven patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea had a positive latex result, but results were negative by EIA, the cytotoxin assay, and toxigenic culture. The EIA demonstrated high specificity and good sensitivity for C. difficile-associated disease cases. The test can be used alone or in combination with the cytotoxin assay or toxigenic culture to provide rapid and sensitive results.     

Utility of a rapid latex test for the detection of Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens

Currently, the method of choice for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease is the detection of cytotoxin in stool filtrates by tissue culture. Since many hospital laboratories do not have tissue culture facilities, there is a need for a rapid test which is both sensitive and specific to diagnose C. difficile disease. A commercial latex agglutination was compared with the conventional cytotoxin tissue culture assay for the detection of C. difficile or its toxin(s) in fecal specimens. Of the 574 specimens evaluated, 111 were cytotoxin positive while 97 were positive by the latex agglutination test. There were 17 specimens positive by latex agglutination but negative by tissue culture assay. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the CDT latex test was 86.1 percent and 95.3 percent respectively. This rapid latex test can serve as an excellent screening procedure for the presence of C. difficile. Those specimens positive by the latex test should be further evaluated for the presence of cytotoxin by tissue culture.     

Multicenter evaluation of four methods for Clostridium difficile detection: ImmunoCard C. difficile, cytotoxin assay, culture, and latex agglutination.

A three-center study was undertaken to compare several test methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile, associated toxin, or related markers by using 927 stool specimens. Methods included direct assay of cytotoxin in stool by tissue culture, C. difficile bacterial culture followed by cytotoxin assay, bacterial culture alone, latex agglutination assay, and the ImmunoCard C. difficile test (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc.). The sensitivities, as determined against direct cytotoxin assay results, of the ImmunoCard C. difficile and latex agglutination assays were 84 and 67%, respectively (92 and 77%, respectively, when adjusted for bacterial culture outcomes). Evaluation for C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD) among 864 patients was based on clinical criteria for antibiotic-associated diarrhea combined with laboratory evidence of toxin or toxin-producing C. difficile in stool specimens. The sensitivity of each test method for screening of CDAD was as follows: bacterial culture, 95%; culture with cytotoxin assay of isolates, 90%; ImmunoCard C. difficile test, 83%; cytotoxin assay 82%; and latex agglutination assay, 67% (P < or = 0.05 versus all other methods). The standard deviations of the test sensitivity statistics between study sites were ranked as follows: cytotoxin assay (+/- 3.1%) < ImmunoCard C. difficile test (+/- 5.7%) < latex agglutination assay (+/- 12.3%) < culture (+/- 24.7%) < culture with cytotoxin assay (+/- 28.0%). The data support the use of the ImmunoCard C. difficile test as an adjunct for the diagnosis of CDAD.     

Virulence of ten serogroups of Clostridium difficile in hamsters

A slide agglutination technique identifying 10 serogroups of Clostridium difficile (A,B,C,D,F,G,H,I,K and X) has been described previously. In this study, we have used the hamster to compare the ability of the 10 serogroup reference strains to colonise and produce disease. Groups of four hamsters were each given a single intraperitoneal injection of either clindamycin or cefoxitin, and an oral challenge dose of C. difficile. The time taken to establish faecal colonisation and the length of survival after colonisation were monitored. All hamsters treated with cefoxitin became colonised by day 3 and those challenged with the cytotoxigenic strains of serogroups A,C,H and K developed colitis and died. Among those challenged with the non-toxigenic strains of groups B,D,I and X and the toxigenic strains of groups F and G, faecal colonisation was established without signs of disease. This demonstrates that there are differences in virulence even among toxigenic strains of C. difficile. The same phenomenon was observed after treatment with clindamycin but the pattern of colonisation was quite different with some strains. In the hamsters challenged with toxigenic strains of groups C and K and non-toxigenic strains of groups D and I, which are highly resistant to clindamycin, the response was the same as with cefoxitin. The results were different with strains which were susceptible to clindamycin. Some animals became colonised much later than those treated with cefoxitin but the mortality was similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of the VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay with C. difficile culture and cytotoxin and latex tests.

The VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay (CDA) is a new, automated, enzyme-linked fluorescent-antibody assay for detection of C. difficile toxin A antigen in stool specimens. Simultaneous, parallel testing was performed by using the VIDAS CDA, the Culturette brand CDT latex test for C. difficile antigens, and conventional laboratory cell culture tests for C. difficile, cytotoxicity and C. difficile culture. One hundred ninety-four consecutive fresh soft or liquid stool samples submitted for C. difficile testing between July and September 1990 were evaluated. Of the 194 samples tested, 19 (10%) were from 16 patients who met our case definition for C. difficile-associated disease. The in vitro tests were evaluated in relation to two forms of a clinical case definition. In one form, a positive culture for toxin-producing C. difficile or a positive cytotoxin result obtained directly from the stool specimen was required as laboratory evidence of C. difficile. In the other, a positive result of any of the four laboratory tests was accepted for the laboratory portion of the case definition. No significant difference between the sensitivity of the VIDAS CDA and that of the Culturette brand CDT latex test was found (48 to 58% sensitivity for the CDT latex test and 52 to 63% sensitivity for the VIDAS CDA compared with 93 to 100% sensitivity for culture and 70 to 100% sensitivity for cytotoxin testing). The performance of the VIDAS CDA, however, was hampered by a high percentage of tests (19%) which gave an uninterpretable result.     

Specific detection of toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens.

Clostridium difficile is the infectious agent responsible for antibiotic-associated colitis. We report the use of the polymerase chain reaction technique to identify toxigenic strains of C. difficile in human stool specimens. A set of primers based on the nucleotide sequence of the toxin B gene, which amplified a 399-bp fragment from isolates producing toxin B, was designed. We examined 28 known toxigenic strains, which were all positive by this assay. DNAs from the nontoxigenic strains examined and from strains of Clostridium sordellii and C. bifermentans were not amplified with these primers. The sensitivity of this assay allowed us to identify as little as 10% toxigenic C. difficile cells in the presence of 90% nontoxigenic cells and to detect the toxin B gene in 1 pg of DNA from a toxigenic strain. DNAs extracted from 18 clinical stool specimens that were positive for toxin B by the tissue culture cytotoxicity assay were also positive by this assay. In addition, we detected toxin B sequences in DNA from 2 of 18 stool specimens that were negative for toxin B by the cytotoxicity assay. These two stool specimens were from patients who had a clinical pattern of colitis that was compatible with C. difficile causation. This rapid, sensitive assay will be useful for specific identification of toxigenic C. difficile and for revealing cases that are undetected by analysis of fecal samples for toxin B alone.     

Latex agglutination test for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in stool samples

A total of 163 stool specimens were tested for detection of Clostridium difficile and its toxin by cytotoxicity assay with tissue culture, latex agglutination test, and isolation of the organism. From 33 specimens which were positive for toxin by cytotoxicity, 30 were positive by the latex agglutination test; the organism was isolated from 21. The total number of samples which were positive with the latex agglutination test was 44. The predictive value of a positive latex agglutination result relative to the cytotoxicity test was 68%, and the predictive value of a negative result was 97.5%. The specificity and sensitivity of the latex agglutination test relative to the cytotoxicity assay and the low cost and simple facilities required indicate that the latex agglutination test is a useful procedure for screening for C. difficile toxins, provided that positive latex results are confirmed by cytotoxicity assay.     

An evaluation of a rapid latex test for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

We present here the results of an evaluation of a rapid latex test for detection of Cl. stridium difficile-associated in comparison with our standard cytotoxin assay and culture for C. difficile. Some 515 diarrheal stools were examined. C. difficile was cultured from 70 specimens (13.5%); 53 specimens (10.2%) were positive with the latex test, and 50 (9.6%) by cytotoxin assay. The latex test did not differ significantly from the cytotoxin assay in sensitivity or specificity compared to culture results. There was also no significant difference in the specificity of the latex test compared to cytotoxin assay in patients in whom the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea was negative. Positive and negative predictive values of the latex test for C. difficile-associated diarrhea were similar to those of cytotoxin assay. The latex test thus appears to be a rapid and practical test for the laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. To optimize specificity and sensitivity its use should be restricted to patients where the diagnosis is strongly suspected and a rapid answer is required. As it does not distinguish between toxigenic virulent C. difficile strains and non-toxigenic avirulent strains, it would seem prudent to confirm positive results subsequently by demonstrating in-vivo or in-vitro cytotoxin production.     

Detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A (enterotoxin) and B (cytotoxin) in clinical specimens. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test

A new latex test, Culturette Brand Rapid Latex Test for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A, was tested on 408 stool samples. In 247 frozen tissue culture supernate specimens previously obtained from patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CAD), the latex test (enterotoxin) was positive in 182 (74%) as compared with 194 (79%) for the repeat tissue culture (P greater than 0.1) cytotoxin (toxin B) test. Testing of 161 fresh stool samples found the latex test superior to tissue culture (P less than 0.05) in cases of CAD (90% positivity vs. 70%), with the two tests being equal in both non-CAD diarrheal and non-diarrheal control groups. In vitro evaluation of 61 C. difficile isolates found all (100%) to be producers of enterotoxin A, while only 53 (87%) produced toxin B. The latex test for C. difficile toxin detection is a rapid, simple test for use in the diagnosis in CAD.     

Detection of staphylococcal exfoliative toxin by slide latex agglutination.

A simple and rapid method in which slide latex agglutination was used was developed to detect the exfoliative toxin (ET) elaborated by clinical isolates. ET types A and B (ET-A and ET-B) were purified by plate gel isoelectrofocusing, and anti-ET sera were obtained by immunizing rabbits. A specific immunoglobulin G antitoxin was then prepared from the immunized rabbit sera by fast protein liquid chromatography, and latex particles were coated with the antitoxin. Of 74 staphylococcal strains isolated from patients with staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, 61 strains were found to produce ET by the newborn mouse bioassay. All 61 strains were shown to be positive for ET-A and ET-B production by the slide latex agglutination method. The lowest concentration of ETs detected by the latex agglutination method was 0.5 microgram/ml, which was much lower than that detected by the double immunodiffusion method, with a sensitivity of 50 micrograms/ml. It is crucial to prove ET production by clinical isolates for the diagnosis and surveillance of staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. The latex agglutination method is a sensitive, simple, and rapid test which can be used as an alternative to the newborn mouse bioassay.     

Evaluation of the latex agglutination test for detection of Clostridium difficile.

We compared two Clostridium difficile latex agglutination tests, Meritec from Meridian Diagnostic (Cincinnati, Ohio) and CDT from Becton-Dickinson (Cockeysville, Md), on 289 specimens submitted for tissue culture cytotoxicity using MRC-5 cells. When compared with CDT, the Meritec latex agglutination test had a sensitivity of 90% (26/29), a specificity of 97% (251/260), and a correlation of 96%. Meritec was compared with tissue culture cytotoxicity on 357 specimens. Meritec had a sensitivity of 77% (30/39), a specificity of 93% (298/318), and a correlation of 92%. Clinical review of 10 Meritec +/- tissue culture cytotoxicity minus patients revealed one likely, two probable, and seven doubtful cases of C difficile disease. In contrast, review of 10 Meritec +/- tissue culture cytotoxicity plus patients showed seven likely and three probable cases of C difficile disease. The Meritec is comparable with the CDT latex agglutination test, but is not nearly as sensitive as either tissue culture assay or culture for detection of C difficile disease. A positive latex agglutination test should be confirmed by a tissue culture cytotoxicity assay.     

Identification of toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains by using a toxin A gene-specific probe.

A 4.5-kilobase PstI fragment encoding part of the toxin A gene was isolated and used as a DNA probe in colony hybridization studies with 58 toxigenic and 17 nontoxigenic Clostridium difficile strains. All 58 toxigenic strains showed positive hybridization, in contrast to the 17 nontoxigenic strains. Southern blot analysis with the toxin A gene probe showed hybridization to a single fragment of equal intensities for HindIII-digested genomic DNAs isolated from C. difficile strains of wide-ranging toxin production. The positive hybridization signals were due to fragments of heterogeneous lengths (9 to 13 kilobases) for toxigenic strains of different types but were absent for the nontoxigenic strains. These results suggest the presence of a single copy of the toxin A gene on the genome of C. difficile strains, and the wide variation of toxin expression is not a reflection of gene copy number. The lack of toxin activity for nontoxigenic strains can be explained by the absence of at least part of the toxin A gene. The toxin A gene probe was tested against clostridial strains from 18 other species, of which only toxigenic C. sordellii strains showed positive hybridization. The specificity of the toxin A gene probe for toxigenic strains may lead to improved methods for the specific identification of toxigenic C. difficile strains from clinical specimens.     

Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection

We have developed a rapid real-time PCR method using fluorescence resonance energy transfer probes and the LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics), which will detect the presence of the tcdC gene of Clostridium difficile in stool samples. Our PCR method also will identify the presence of base pair deletions, one of which (18 bp) has been associated with the "epidemic" toxin-hyperproducing strains. We compared the results of this PCR with those of three C. difficile toxin-detecting enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), an EIA for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), and culture of C. difficile. A total of 200 stool specimens were studied by the methods under comparison. C. difficile was isolated from 49 specimens by culture, and 44 of these were confirmed as containing one of the genes associated with toxin production ("toxigenic culture"). Using toxigenic culture as the "gold standard", the sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values, respectively, of the assays were 48%, 98%, 88%, and 87% for the Premier toxin A and B test; 48%, 99%, 91%, and 87% for the ImmunoCard toxin A & B test; 48%, 84%, 46%, and 85% for the Xpect C. difficile toxin A/B test; 32%, 100%, 100%, and 84% for the Triage C. difficile panel (for toxin A); and 86%, 97%, 90%, and 96% for the LightCycler PCR. Thus, in comparison to the sensitivity of toxigenic culture, the sensitivities of the toxin immunoassays were unacceptably low, while the LightCycler real-time PCR assay for the detection of the tcdC gene of C. difficile is sensitive and specific.     

Nontoxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile lack the genes for both toxin A and toxin B.

A total of 39 toxigenic and 20 nontoxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile were tested for the presence of either toxin A or toxin B by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All toxigenic strains produced cytotoxin as assayed by using highly sensitive fetal lung fibroblasts and were positive for toxin A as well as toxin B in the PCR assay. All nontoxigenic strains failed to produce toxin and were negative in the PCR assay. This study shows that nontoxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile lack the toxin A as well as the toxin B gene.     

Protection of hamsters against Clostridium difficile ileocaecitis by prior colonisation with non-pathogenic strains

Prior colonisation of clindamycin-treated hamsters with non-toxigenic strains of C. difficile protected them from subsequent colonisation with a toxigenic pathogenic strain. In total, 13 of 18 'protected' hamsters survived for up to 27 days whereas all 27 animals challenged with the toxigenic strain alone died within 48 h. Protection was not evident if a heat-killed suspension was used or if the colonising non-toxigenic strain was first removed with vancomycin. No antitoxic activity could be detected in the faeces of animals colonised with the non-toxigenic strains. Other species of clostridia did not protect against the lethal effects of subsequent exposure to the toxigenic strain. Conversely, non-toxigenic strains would not protect the animals from the lethal effects of a different clostridial pathogen, C. spiroforme. In most cases, even in the protected animals, the toxigenic strain eventually became dominant and caused disease, with translocation across the gut wall occurring early in the disease process. It was also shown that a non-toxigenic strain of C. difficile can adhere to gut mucosa. It is proposed that the protection afforded by the non-toxigenic strains may be due to competition for ecological niches.     

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection

Clostridium difficile infection is the primary cause of health care-associated diarrhea. While most laboratories have been using rapid antigen tests for detecting C. difficile toxins, they have poor sensitivity; newer molecular methods offer rapid results with high test sensitivity and specificity. This study was designed to compare the performances of two molecular assays (Meridian illumigene and BD GeneOhm) and two antigen assays (Wampole Quik Chek Complete and TechLab Tox A/B II) to detect toxigenic C. difficile. Fecal specimens from hospitalized patients (n = 139) suspected of having C. difficile infection were tested by the four assays. Nine specimens were positive and 109 were negative by all four methods. After discrepant analysis by toxigenic culture (n = 21), the total numbers of stool specimens classified as positive and negative for toxigenic C. difficile were 21 (15%) and 118 (85%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were as follows: GeneOhm (95.2%, 100%, 100%, and 99.2%), illumigene (95.2%, 96.6%, 83.3%, and 99.2%), Tox A/B II (52.4%, 97.5%, 78.6%, and 92.4%), and Quik Chek Complete (47.6%, 100%, 100%, and 91.9%). The illumigene assay performed comparably to the GeneOhm assay with a slight decrease in test specificity; the sensitivities of both far exceeded those of the antigen assays. The clinical characteristics of the concordant and discrepant study patients were similar, including stool consistency and frequency. In the era of rapid molecular-based tests for toxigenic C. difficile, toxin enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) should no longer be considered the standard of care.     

Purification and characterization of Clostridium difficile toxin.

Recent evidence indicates that toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains are a major cause of antimicrobial-associated ileocecitis in laboratory animals and pseudomembranous colitis in humans. C. difficile ATCC 9689 was cultivated in a synthetic medium to which 3% ultrafiltrated proteose peptone was added. Purification of the toxin from broth filtrate was accomplished through ultrafiltration (100,000 nominal-molecular-weight-limit membrane), precipitation with 75% (NH4)2SO4, and chromatographic separation using Bio-Gel A 5m followed by ion-exchange chromatography on a diethylaminoethyl-Sephadex A-25 column. The purified toxin displayed only one band on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and approximately 170 pg was cytopathic for human amnion cells. The isolated toxin was neutralized by Clostridium sordelli antitoxin, heat labile (56 degrees C for 30 min), and inactivated at pH 4 and 9; it had an isoelectric point of 5.0, increased vascular permeability in rabbits, and caused ileocecitis in hamsters when injected intracecally. Treatment of the toxin with trypsin, chymotrypsin, pronase, amylase, or ethylmercurithiosalicylate caused inactivation, whereas lipase had no effect. By gel filtration, its molecular weight was estimated as 530,000. Upon reduction and denaturation, the toxin dissociated into 185,000- and 50,000-molecular-weight components, as determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Extensive dissociation yielded only the 50,000-molecular-weight component. The toxin appears to be protoplasmic and is released into the surrounding environment upon autolysis of the cells. Attempts to correlate specific enzymatic activity with the toxin have been unsuccessful. These studies will help delineate the role of C. difficile toxin in antimicrobial-associated colitis and diarrhea.     

Purification and characterisation of toxin B from a strain of Clostridium difficile that does not produce toxin A

Most toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile produce both toxin A and toxin B. The toxin produced by C. difficile strain 8864 was characterised and compared with those produced by C. difficile strain 10463. Toxin A was not detected by immunoassay in cultures from strain 8864 and all the cytotoxic activity produced by this strain was neutralised by antiserum to toxin B. Toxin B from strain 8864 was purified and compared with toxin B from strain 10463. The size of the purified subunits of toxin B from strain 8864 differed slightly from those of strain 10463 and there were small immunological differences. The effect on fibroblast cells was more like that of C. sordellii cytotoxin than of toxin B from strain 10463. These results suggest that C. difficile strain 8864 produces a modified toxin B and does not produce toxin A.     

Concurrence of Clostridium difficile toxin A enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, fecal lactoferrin assay, and clinical criteria with C. difficile cytotoxin titer in two patient cohorts.

The accurate and sensitive diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-related diarrhea, normally treated with vancomycin, has become increasingly important in light of the emergence of dangerous new strains of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. In order to improve the threshold for C. difficile diagnosis and treatment, a number of commonly used assays for the diagnosis of C. difficile diarrhea were examined. These included an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for C. difficile toxin A (ToxA), a CHO cell culture assay for fecal C. difficile (cyto)toxin B, and a lactoferrin latex agglutination assay for fecal lactoferrin (LFLA). We studied 722 fecal specimens submitted by physicians for C. difficile toxin testing at the Salem, Va., Veterans' Affairs Hospital and at the University of Virginia Medical Center in Charlottesville. Charts were reviewed from 123 Veterans' Hospital patients and 114 University of Virginia patients for clinical criteria indicative of C. difficile diarrhea. An increasing titer of CHO cell cytotoxicity was correlated with an increasing likelihood of ToxA positivity (5 to 90%), LFLA positivity (39 to 77%), and clinical agreement (28 to 85%). However, some data indicate that the CHO cell cytotoxicity assay may be nonspecific when positive only at low titers. When the CHO assay result is positive at high titers, it remains the best diagnostic tool. Yet, when it is positive at a low titer, careful interpretation of the results in conjunction with other assays and the clinical setting is warranted, especially in light of new drug-resistant strains of microorganisms.