Reduction of fatal complications from combined modality therapy in Hodgkin's disease

A total of 464 pathologically staged IA through IIIB Hodgkin's disease patients were evaluated for the risk of developing acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, or a fatal infection after treatment with radiation therapy (RT) alone, initial combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy (CMT), or RT with MOPP administered at relapse. Patients received a standard six cycles of MOPP, and additional maintenance chemotherapy was not administered. Patients receiving total nodal irradiation (TNI) and MOPP chemotherapy have an 11.9% actuarial risk of developing a fatal complication at ten years, as compared to a 0.8% risk for lesser field irradiation and MOPP (P = .005). The risk with RT alone is 0.6%. Patients 40 years of age or older have a greater risk for complications. These data report a low risk for fatal complication with CMT when less than TNI is administered and when maintenance chemotherapy is not used.     

Stages IIB and IIIB Hodgkin's disease. Results of combined modality treatment.

Between April 1969, and December 1974, 23 IIB and 26 IIIB surgically staged patients with Hodgkin's disease were treated at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy. Stage IIB patients received either mantle and para-aortic-splenic pedicle, or total modal irradiation (TNI) alone or with the addition of combination chemotherapy. Relapse-free survival is 83% and overall survival 88%. Eleven patients received combination chemotherapy in addition to mantle and para-aortic irradiation, and both the relapse-free and overall survival are 100%. Of the stage IIIB patients, seven received TNI alone with four relapses, and 19 were treated with TNI and MOPP with two relapses. These relapse rates are significantly different (p less than 0.05). The relapse-free and overall survival for all stage IIIB patients is 66% and 84% respectively. These data imply that irradiation alone is not adequate treatment for stage IIIB Hodgkin's disease, and that with the addition of combination chemotherapy both the disease-free and overall survival is similar to that of early stage Hodgkin's disease without systemic symptoms. The ideal management of stage IIB Hodgkin's disease is less certain; it is our plan to study the efficacy of combined modality treatment.     

Treatment selection for stage IIIA Hodgkin's disease patients

Two treatment policies for the therapy of patients with Stage IIIA Hodgkin's disease are compared. From 1969-1976, 49 newly diagnosed and pathologically staged IIIA patients received total nodal irradiation (TNI) alone (no liver irradiation). Although actuarial survival was 80% at 5 years and 68% at 10 years, actuarial freedom from relapse was only 38% at 5 years. Accordingly, a new treatment policy was instituted in 1976. Patients with either CS IIIA disease, multiple splenic nodules, IIIA with a large mediastinal mass or III2, received combined modality therapy (combination chemotherapy and irradiation). All others received TNI. Thirty-six patients have been treated under the new program. The actuarial survival is 90% at 5 years and the relapse-free survival is 87%, suggesting the superiority of this approach.     

Treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease in pediatric patients.

From 1970 to 1976, twenty patients with stage II E or II B to IV B Hodgkin's disease were treated at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Initially, four of the stage II or III patients received planned total nodal irradiation (TNI) alone; three patients developed progressive disease during irradiation, and one relapsed after 18 months. These results with TNI led to the use of combined modality therapy. Sixteen patients (4, stage II E or B; 8, stage III; 4, stage IV) were treated with COPP (cyclophosphamide, Oncovin, prednisone, and procarbazine) and radiation therapy. In 14 patients treatment was started with COPP. Patients with disease below L2 received TNI; the rest received involved field (IF) or extended field (EF) irradiation. No patient treated with combination therapy encountered life-threatening toxicity. Relapse-free survival in 12 stage II or III patients is 100% with a median follow-up of 28 months (range, 24 to 91 months). Only one of four stage IV patients is alive. Combined modality therapy is effective, tolerable therapy for children with stage II B--III Hodgkin's disease. No relapses occurred in 10 patients given less that potentially curative radiation. Smaller radiation fields and lower doses are planned for the future.     

Late regrowth of pituitary adenomas after irradiation and/or surgery. Hazard function analysis

A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients with pituitary adenomas treated at the Radiation Oncology Center, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri. Of 210 patients treated from April 1954 through December 1982, 70 were treated with radiotherapy alone (RT), 121 received immediate postoperative RT (2 to 6 weeks), and 19 received RT following surgical failure. The mean follow-up time from the date of diagnosis for those patients alive at the time of last follow-up was 13.0 years (range, 3.0 to 30.0 years). Actuarial progression-free survival was analyzed up to 30 years. The 10-, 20-, and 30-year progression-free survival was 80.5%, 73.5%, and 73.5% for those patients treated with irradiation alone and 92.8%, 71.2%, and 44.0% for those treated with immediate postoperative irradiation. The median time to first failure from initial diagnosis by original treatment was 3.8 years for surgery alone, 4.2 years for RT only, and 10.2 years for surgery plus postoperative RT. Analysis for risk of recurrence per 5-year interval was performed using a hazard function analysis. The risk of recurrence after radiotherapy alone was greatest during the first 5-year interval after treatment and decreased to zero by 20 years. However, the risk of recurrence after primary surgery and postoperative radiotherapy revealed an increasing risk for recurrence up to 30 years after treatment. The concept of "cure" for pituitary adenomas requires extended follow-up.     

Liver irradiation in stage IIIA Hodgkin's disease patients with splenic involvement

Curative treatment for Hodgkin's disease for patients who are pathology-staged IIIA, spleen-positive, consisted of total nodal irradiation (TNI) alone at the University of Minnesota Hospitals prior to 1975. This approach has been modified since 1975 to give low-dose irradiation to the liver in addition to TNI because of the high recurrence rate with TNI alone. Recurrence-free survival improved significantly when the liver was irradiated as compared to results with TNI alone (78% vs. 41% at 5 years, p = 0.004). The 5-year, overall survival was not significantly different in the two groups (90% vs. 80% at 5 years, p = 0.373). Various prognostic factors were examined. Patients who received liver treatment had statistically significant improvement in recurrence-free survival as compared to patients who did not receive liver treatment in the following categories: anatomic substage IIIA1, histologic classification of nodular sclerosis, male gender, age less than 40, number of primary sites, and extent of splenic disease. However, these factors failed to show clinical significance as prognostic factors. We conclude that TNI with low-dose liver irradiation should be used as the primary modality of treatment of Hodgkin's disease, pathology-staged IIIA patients. We conclude that chemotherapy should be reserved for recurrences in view of the excellent current results and the lesser risk from treatment, especially the risk of carcinogenesis.     

Stage III Hodgkin's disease: improved survival with combined modality therapy as compared with radiation therapy alone

This is a retrospective analysis of 120 patients with pathologically stage IIIA and IIIB Hodgkin's disease treated from April 1969 to December 1982. The median follow-up was 108 months. Treatment consisted of radiation therapy (RT) alone in 54 patients and combined radiation therapy and MOPP (nitrogen mustard, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) chemotherapy (CMT) in 66 patients. Stage III patients treated with CMT have an improved actuarial 12-year survival as compared with patients treated with RT alone with MOPP reserved for relapse (80% v 64%; P = .026). The 12-year actuarial freedom from first relapse by treatment for stage III patients is 83% and 40%, respectively (P less than .0001). Improved survivals following combined modality therapy are seen for the following subgroups of stage III patients: stage III2, 66% (CMT) v 44% (total nodal irradiation; TNI), P = .04; stage III1, 97% (CMT) v 73% (TNI), P = .05; stage III mixed cellularity or lymphocyte depletion histology, 94% (CMT) v 65% (TNI), P = .007; and stage III extensive splenic involvement, 77% (CMT) v 58% (TNI), P = .02. These survival differences are not seen in patients with nodular sclerosis or lymphocyte predominance histology or in patients with minimal splenic involvement. These data indicate that the initial use of CMT in stage III Hodgkin's disease results in an improved survival as compared with initial treatment with RT with MOPP reserved for relapse. Patients with limited Stage IIIA disease may still be candidates for radiation therapy alone.     

Adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy following radical hysterectomy in stage IB CA of the cervix--analysis of treatment failure

Among 240 patients treated by radiation therapy for clinical Stage IB cancer of the cervix between 1969 and 1980, 38 patients received postoperative pelvic radiation therapy after radical hysterectomy because of positive pelvic lymph nodes and/or close surgical margins. The overall recurrence was 45% (17 of 38), and the major complication rate was 15% in minimum 5-year follow-up. In patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes, the pelvic recurrence was 13% (3 of 23). However, distant metastases alone was 26% (6 of 23), which was the most common treatment failure. In 11 patients with close surgical margins, eight patients had paracervical margins and three had vaginal margins. All five patients with paracervical margins treated with vaginal ovoid irradiation only had pelvic recurrence. No local failure occurred in the other three patients treated with whole pelvic irradiation. All patients with vaginal margin alone treated with vaginal ovoid or whole pelvic irradiation had no recurrence of cancer in the pelvis. On the basis of our data, whole pelvic irradiation with or without vaginal ovoid irradiation is necessary in those with a close paracervical margin. In patients with close vaginal margin, whole pelvic irradiation with or without vaginal ovoid irradiation is recommended. The vaginal ovoid irradiation alone should be limited to very selected cases.     

Premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery, radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy have a low risk of local failure

The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients with positive nodes is now routine, but the optimal local treatment of these patients is uncertain. To determine the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the likelihood of local recurrence as the first site of failure in premenopausal patients treated with conservative surgery (CS) and radiotherapy (RT), we examined the outcome of 74 patients treated with CS, RT, and adjuvant chemotherapy and compared it to the outcome in 192 patients treated with CS and RT alone. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of four or more cycles of either a doxorubicin-containing regimen or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil. All patients were less than 50 years old, had UICC-AJCC Stage I or II breast cancer treated between 1968 and 1981, had gross excision of the primary tumor, and had a total radiation dose to the primary tumor bed of greater than or equal to 6000 cGy. Factors predicting for local recurrence, such as extensive intraductal carcinoma and age less than 35, were equivalent in the two groups. Women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly worse T- and N-stages than women treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy alone: 61% versus 36% had T2 tumors (p = 0.0003), 34% versus 6% had clinically positive nodes (p less than 0.0001), and 97% versus 4% had pathologically positive nodes (p less than 0.0001). Despite the poorer prognosis of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, within 5 years of diagnosis, 4% of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had their initial relapse in the breast and 24% had initial failure elsewhere, compared with 15% local failure first and 14% failure elsewhere first for those treated without chemotherapy (p = 0.01). We conclude that premenopausal patients with positive nodes treated with combined modality therapy (conservative surgery, radiation therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy) have a low risk of local recurrence as a first site of failure. These results suggest a possible interaction between radiation therapy and chemotherapy in their effects on local tumor control.     

Clinical stages I and II Hodgkin's disease: a specifically tailored therapy according to prognostic factors

The H5 program in clinical stage (CS) I to II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease (HD) was tailored to prognostic factors identified in former European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) studies. Among the 494 adult patients included in the study, the 237 patients belonging to the favorable group (H5F) underwent a staging laparotomy (Sx) in order to select the patients who could be treated with limited radiotherapy (RT) only. Thus, 198 patients (84%) with negative laparotomy were treated with RT alone and randomized to either mantle irradiation (M) or extended field mantle plus para-aortic (M + PA) irradiation. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 99% of the patients. There was no difference in the 6-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate (74% and 72%, respectively) or survival rate (96% and 89%). Therefore, Sx helped to define those patients who could be treated with M alone in contrast to those who required more aggressive therapy. The 39 patients with positive laparotomy were treated as the unfavorable group (H5U) from onset and randomized to either total/subtotal nodal irradiation (TNI/STNI) or a sandwiched mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) X 3, M irradiation, MOPP X 3 protocol (3M). Although the RFS rate was higher in the 3M arm (100% v 53%; P = .002), the 6-year survival was not significantly different between the two arms (overall, 92%). In the 257 patients with initial unfavorable disease, the Sx was avoided. They were randomized to either TNI/STNI or 3M. In complete responders (96%), the 6-year RFS was 91% in the 3M arm and 77% in the TNI/STNI arm (P = .02). The pattern of failure differed in the two arms: the inverted Y and spleen irradiation controlled occult infradiaphragmatic disease better than MOPP; conversely, less patients begun on MOPP recurred in the involved mantle areas. The difference in 6-year actuarial total survival (TS) (89% and 82%; P = .05 in favor of the 3M arm) was not retrieved after exclusion of the unrelated deaths from the analysis. The two arms produced similar TS in patients under 40 years of age. TNI retains interest, especially in young men wishing to preserve fertility. The overall result shows that when treatment is tailored to initial prognostic factors, excellent results can be obtained in all patient subgroups at minimal morbidity and toxic cost.     

Malignant mixed Müllerian tumors of the uterus: analysis of patterns of failure, prognostic factors, and treatment outcome

PURPOSE: To determine the survival outcomes, prognostic factors, and patterns of failure in patients with malignant mixed Müllerian tumor (MMMT) of the uterus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1954 and 1998, 300 patients with clinical Stage I-III MMMT of the uterus were treated with curative intent at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Their hospital records were reviewed to obtain patient and tumor characteristics; details of surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy; and long-term outcome. Surviving patients were followed for a median of 109 months (range 15-138). Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with differences assessed by log-rank tests. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients, 113 (38%) were treated with surgery alone, 160 (53%) with surgery plus adjuvant EBRT or ICRT, and 27 (9%) with RT alone. Forty-eight patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. At 5 years, the overall rates of survival and cause-specific survival were 31% and 33%, respectively. Women who were postmenopausal or had a history of prior pelvic RT, pain at presentation, clinical Stage II-III disease, uterine enlargement (>/=12 weeks), or an abnormal Papanicolaou smear finding had a significantly poorer prognosis than the other patients in the series. Of the 273 patients who underwent surgery, those who had positive abdominal washings, uterine length >10 cm, or extrauterine spread of disease to the cervix, adnexa, or peritoneum had a significantly worse prognosis than the other patients. Factors found on multivariate analysis to have an independent adverse influence on cause-specific survival included postmenopausal status (p = 0.0007, relative risk [RR] 3.3), uterine length >10 cm (p = 0.0001, RR 2.2), cervical involvement (p = 0.002, RR 1.8), and peritoneal involvement (p = 0.0001, RR 4.3). At 5 years, the rates of pelvic and distant disease recurrence for the entire group of 300 patients were 38% and 57%, respectively. The most common site of distant recurrence was the peritoneal cavity. Patients treated with pelvic RT had a lower rate of pelvic recurrence than patients treated with surgery alone (28% vs. 48%, p = 0.0002), but the overall survival rates (36% vs. 27%, p = 0.10) and distant metastasis rates (57% vs. 54%, p = 0.96) were not significantly different. However, patients treated with pelvic RT had a longer mean time to any distant relapse (17.3 vs. 7.0 months, p = 0.001) than patients treated with surgery alone. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy did not correlate with the survival rate or rate of distant metastasis. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant pelvic RT decreased the risk of pelvic recurrence and may delay the appearance of distant metastases after hysterectomy for MMMT. However, the survival rates remain poor because of a high rate of distant recurrence. As more effective systemic chemotherapy is developed to control microscopic distant disease, the role of RT in controlling locoregional disease in the pelvis and abdomen may become more important. Future research should consider programs that integrate surgery, RT, and chemotherapy to maximize the probability of cure.     

Cervical cancer: combined modality therapy

Prospective, randomized studies conducted over the past 10 years have changed the management of patients with advanced cervical cancer. The reviewed studies evaluated the use of surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy in patients with various stages of cervical carcinoma in the absence and presence of high-risk factors for recurrence. A study by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) compared pelvic with pelvic plus prophylactic para-aortic irradiation in patients with stages IB (> 4 cm), IIA, and IIB cervical cancer. The 10-year survival advantage was 11% for patients treated with prophylactic para-aortic irradiation. A follow-up study compared pelvic plus prophylactic para-aortic irradiation and brachytherapy with pelvic irradiation, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU in patients with IB-to IVA-stage cervical cancer. Overall and disease-free survivals were significantly improved in patients receiving chemotherapy. In patients with a prevalence of stage IIB and III, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) demonstrated that treatment with hydroxyurea alone was inferior to cisplatin or cisplatin, 5-FU, and hydroxy-urea in patients treated concurrently with pelvic irradiation and brachytherapy, and the GOG adopted irradiation and weekly cisplatin as standard therapy. Further GOG studies suggest that irradiation and weekly cisplatin chemotherapy without hysterectomy is the optimal treatment for patients with stage IB cervical cancer. High-risk factors for recurrence include tumor size, depth of tumor invasion, lymphovascular space involvement, and lymph node involvement. Prospective, randomized studies conducted by the GOG evaluated the effectiveness of various treatments in patients with high-risk factors. In one study that did not use chemotherapy, the recurrence-free interval was about 10% better for stage IB patients receiving postoperative irradiation after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy compared with those who received no further therapy. Patients with Stages IB and IIA disease who, following radical hysterectomy and lymph node dissection, are identified as having positive pelvic lymph nodes and positive parametrial involvement, are at higher risk for recurrence and death than the high-risk group described above. An intergroup study conducted by the GOG, RTOG, and Southwest Oncology Group compared postoperative pelvic irradiation alone with postoperative pelvic irradiation plus concurrent chemotherapy in this group of patients. Overall and progression-free survivals were superior for patients receiving chemotherapy, and their greatest survival occurred in patients who received 3 or 4 chemotherapy cycles compared with 1 or 2 cycles or no chemotherapy. These findings are summarized with respect to their implications fortreatment of patients with advanced cervical cancer.     

Analysis of treatment modalities and their failures in stage IB cancer of the cervix

This is a retrospective analysis of 240 patients who had clinical Stage IB cancer of the cervix treated with radiation between 1969 and 1980. Of these, 186 patients were treated with a combination of external and intracavitary radiation therapy, and 54 patients received adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy. The minimum follow-up was 5 years. In the group who received only radiation therapy, the overall recurrence in 170 patients (excluding 16 patients found at laparotomy to have unresectable disease) was 17% (29 of 170); pelvic recurrence was 9% and distant metastases alone was 6%. In the group who received the adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy, 16 patients had a simple hysterectomy followed by vaginal ovoid and/or external pelvic irradiation for an unexpected Stage IB cancer of the cervix. Their overall recurrence was 37.5% (6 of 16). Pelvic recurrence was the most common treatment failure with a recurrence of 31%. Significant prognostic factors were depth of stromal invasion and status of surgical margins. Thirty-eight patients had a radical hysterectomy followed by postoperative radiation therapy because of positive pelvic lymph nodes and/or close surgical margins. In patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes, the overall recurrence was 39% (9 of 23); pelvic recurrence was 13%. Distant metastases, the most common treatment failure, was 26%. In seven patients with close surgical margins, five recurred in the pelvis. There was no distant metastases without pelvic failure. Five of eight patients with close paracervical margins recurred in the pelvis. All five of these patients were treated with vaginal ovoid irradiation alone. Whole pelvic irradiation plus vaginal ovoid irradiation is necessary in those with close paracervical margins. The vaginal ovoid irradiation alone should be limited to very selected patients with positive vaginal margins only.     

High-dose whole abdominal and pelvic irradiation for treatment of ovarian carcinoma: long-term toxicity and outcomes

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of high-dose whole abdominal and pelvic irradiation (WART) in the treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review was performed on 71 patients with Stage I-III ovarian carcinoma who were treated with WART using an open field technique after total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy with or without omentectomy. Whole abdominal doses greater than typically recommended were used in a series of patients to enhance local control and to decrease abdominal recurrence. None of the patients had received chemotherapy before RT. Thirty-one patients received Alkeran or cyclophosphamide and two received cisplatin-based chemotherapy after WART. The median whole abdominal dose was 36 Gy (range 9-45.5), delivered in a median of 30 fractions (range 8-46). A pelvic boost was delivered using AP-PA fields during whole abdominal RT to a total midline pelvic dose of 200 cGy/d. The median pelvic dose was 51 Gy (range 16-59). The right lobe and a portion of the left lobe of the liver were shielded with custom blocks at a median dose of 25 Gy (range 9-41). The kidneys were shielded either AP-PA or PA from the first day of RT. The median dose to the kidneys was 19 Gy (range 4-30). RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate was 93%, 48%, and 29% for Stage I, II, and III patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, stage and the extent of residual disease were independent prognostic factors. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rate for the 46 patients in the intermediate-risk group was 61% and 54%, respectively. For this group, a total abdominal dose of > or /=36 Gy was associated with a longer overall survival independent of stage, grade, and the amount of residual disease. This was most likely due to a significant reduction in the incidence of abdominal recurrence in patients receiving >36 Gy to the whole abdomen (18% vs. 49%, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed that grade (p = 0.023) and abdominal dose (p = 0.018) were independent factors influencing the rate of abdominal recurrence. Pelvic recurrence was rare as a first site of failure (6%). Twenty-one percent (n = 15) of the patients developed Grade 3 or 4 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] criteria) chronic small or large bowel toxicity. Eleven percent of all patients had a small bowel obstruction requiring surgery. A whole abdominal dose >30 Gy and a pelvic dose >50 Gy were associated with a significant increase in small bowel obstruction (p = 0.01) independent of other factors. Chronic Grade 3 or 4 (Common Toxicity Criteria) anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia were seen in 7%, 1%, and 4% of the patients, respectively. Transient liver enzyme elevation was common (62%). Two patients had Grade 3 (RTOG) hepatic toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 renal toxicity (RTOG) was observed in 4%, and 2 patients (3%) were diagnosed with pelvic insufficiency fractures that were managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: Survival after RT for ovarian carcinoma rivals that achieved with systemic chemotherapy. The results of this study suggest a possible dose-control relationship between the whole abdominal dose and the risk of abdominal recurrence; however, a higher rate of small bowel obstruction was observed when greater abdominal doses and greater pelvic doses were combined. Careful attention to balancing toxicity and efficacy is imperative if RT is to have a future role in the treatment of this disease.     

根治术后盆腔复发直肠癌疗效及预后因素分析

目的 分析直肠癌根治术后盆腔复发规律以及放疗疗效和影响预后的因素.方法 回顾分析2000-2006年直肠癌根治术后盆腔复发接受放疗患者93例,分别为单纯放疗21例、放化疗56例、放疗结合手术和(或)化疗16例.放疗采用60Co或加速器X线,中位剂量59.4Gy,其中90例采用常规分割技术.68例患者放疗后接受了1～8个(中位数3个)疗程化疗,42例行同步放化疗,多为氟尿嘧啶为主的化疗方案.16例患者在放疗后接受了复发灶切除术,其中RO切除7例,姑息性肿块切除9例.结果 全组共132处复发,常见复发部位为直肠周围(31.8%)和骶前区(30.3%),髂外淋巴结和腹股沟淋巴结少见(1.5%和3.0%).总随访率为92%,随访满2、5年者分别为39、4例.有局部症状的84例患者中83%(70例)放疗后症状缓解.全组2、5年局部无进展率分别为49%、22%,2、5年生存率分别为46%、14%.多因素分析结果显示复发后治疗方法是影响直肠癌根治术后复发的局部无进展率的独立预后因素,复发灶最大径、无病间期、放疗后有无远处转移是影响直肠癌根治术后复发患者生存率的独立顶后因素.结论 直肠周围区、骶前区、髂内淋巴结区是直肠癌主要复发部位;放疗可明显改善直肠癌根治术后盆腔复发患者的症状和提高生存质量,放疗联合手术和(或)化疗可提高直肠癌根治术后复发的局部无进展率,复发灶直径＞5 cm、无病间期＜2年、放疗后有远处转移是影响预后的因素.     

Outcome and pattern of failure in pathologic stage I-II papillary serous carcinoma of the endometrium: implications for adjuvant radiation therapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome and patterns of failure in women with pathologic Stage I-II papillary serous carcinoma of the uterus and to discuss the implications for adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: Twenty-three pathologic Stage I-II uterine papillary serous carcinoma patients were treated at our institution between 1980 and 2001. All underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and assessment of peritoneal cytology. Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling was performed in 12 and 8 patients, respectively. FIGO stages were as follows: IA = 3, IB = 8, IC = 6, IIA = 5, and IIB = 1. Adjuvant therapies included the following: 9 none, 10 RT (6 pelvic, 1 vaginal brachytherapy, 3 both), 4 chemotherapy, and 1 hormonal therapy. No patient received whole abdominal radiation therapy or para-aortic RT. Disease-free survival, pelvic recurrence-free survival, and cause-specific survival were estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier, and prognostic factors were analyzed by the log-rank test. Median follow-up was 38.7 months (range: 3-109 months). RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival and cause-specific survival for the entire group was 41% and 73.6%, respectively. Nine patients developed recurrent disease. Five failed in the pelvis, of which 4 relapsed in the vagina. No pelvic failures occurred in women treated with adjuvant RT. Patients treated with adjuvant RT had a better 5-year actuarial pelvic recurrence-free survival (100% vs. 57.5%, p = 0.06) than patients treated with surgery alone. Two patients failed in the abdomen. However, neither developed an isolated abdominal recurrence. Six patients failed in distant sites, primarily the lungs and bone. CONCLUSION: Although patients with pathologic Stage I-II uterine papillary serous carcinomas have organ-confined disease, recurrence is common, particularly in the pelvis and distant sites. Our results suggest that adjuvant RT reduces the risk of pelvic failure. Contrary to traditional assumptions, however, abdominal recurrence was uncommon in our patients, despite the lack of whole abdominal radiation therapy. Our results support the use of pelvic RT in these patients. Future studies should investigate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Is chemotherapy effective in reducing the local failure rate in patients with operable breast cancer?

To evaluate the role of chemotherapy in local control of primary breast cancer, the incidence of local failure was evaluated in 768 patients treated with surgery and adjuvant, combination chemotherapy that contained fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) at our institute between 1974 and 1982. Of these patients, 429 received postoperative irradiation (XRT) before adjuvant therapy. A group of 178 historical control patients had mastectomies and received irradiation after surgery without chemotherapy. The rates of locoregional recurrence alone in the three groups were as follows: FAC, 12%; FAC plus XRT, 5%; and XRT, 10%. The difference in recurrence rates between the FAC group and the FAC plus XRT subgroup was significant (P less than 0.01). Local failure rates were evaluated by stage and nodal status; patients with Stage III disease and those with four or more disease-positive nodes had a higher incidence of local failure than did patients with Stage II disease or those who had one to three positive nodes. Systemic chemotherapy and local therapies resulted in 50% local control at the time of locoregional recurrence in patients treated with FAC, whereas local control was achieved in 18% of patients with local recurrence in the XRT subgroups. Overall life-time local control of disease was similar whether irradiation was administered initially (in the period after operation) or at the time of local recurrence. Irradiation after mastectomy remains an integral part of a combined modality approach in selected groups of patients.     

Comparison of outcomes of radical prostatectomy with and without adjuvant pelvic irradiation in patients with pathologic stage C (T3N0) adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland (CaP) are frequently (approximately 50%) found at radical prostatectomy to have extracapsular disease or positive surgical margins. The management of these patients is a subject of controversy because some question the impact of this manifestation of CaP on patient survival or disease-free survival. Between 1976 and 1991, 241 patients with pathologic stage C (T3N0) were treated in this medical center. Of these 241 patients, 201 (83%) received a planned postoperative pelvic irradiation consisting of 48 Gy given to the prostatic fossa, whereas 40 (17%) patients were treated with radical prostatectomy alone. The two study urologists selected these patients not to receive postoperative irradiation based on intraoperative findings and important prognostic factors. Comparison of treatment outcomes in these two treatment groups is a subject of this report. The 201 patients treated with surgery-radiotherapy (S+RT) combination had a higher pathologic stage, greater incidence of seminal vesicle involvement, p = 0.002, and higher mean and median preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, p < 0.0001, than the 40 surgery (S) alone patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of higher Gleason's score by the treatment group, p = 0.14. In univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in survival, disease-free survival, and time to failure between the two treatment groups. In multivariate analysis after controlling for pathologic stage and Gleason's score, the 201 adjuvant radiotherapy patients were predicted to have recurrence at 68% (95% confidence interval 39%-118%) the rate of the 40 surgery-alone patients. Local recurrence with or without metastatic disease was found in 10% of surgery-alone patients as compared to 5% in those also receiving postoperative irradiation. Treatment tolerance was very good with minor radiotherapy complications only. There was no significant difference in the incidence of incontinence between the two treatment arms. In summary: (a) The use of moderate-dose postoperative radiotherapy was of low toxicity and it did not increase the incidence of incontinence. (b) Local recurrence was 5% in S+RT and 10% in S-alone patients. (c) In multivariate analysis, S+RT patients had 68% rate of recurrence of S-alone patients. (d) Adjuvant RT probably reduces the risk of recurrence in patients with poor prognostic factors. (e) These data need to be interpreted with caution because of the nonrandomized nature of the study.     

150例早期霍奇金淋巴瘤的综合治疗

目的 对比单纯化疗、单纯放疗与综合治疗对早期霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)的疗效.方法 回顾性分析150例Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期(早期)HL患者的临床资料,按照初次治疗方式分为单纯化疗组(22例)、单纯放疗组(18例)、化疗联合放疗的综合治疗组(109例)和手术组(1例).化疗方案以ABVD和MOPP为主,放疗方式主要包括受累野放疗、扩大野放疗和次全淋巴结照射.结果 结节硬化型、混合细胞型、淋巴细胞为主型、淋巴细胞消减型和结节性淋巴细胞为主型HL分别为84、39、23、3和1例.全组有72例患者资料完整,可判断预后,其中以欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织及德国霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组标准判断为0分者分别占36.1%和29.2%.全组完全缓解33例,部分缓解109例,疾病稳定5例,疾病进展3例.全组中位随访71.5个月,6年治疗失败率为18.8%,7年总生存率为89.3%.单因素分析显示,综合治疗的疗效显著优于单纯化疗,结节硬化型和混合细胞型的治疗失败风险明显低于淋巴细胞为主型(均P＜0.05).多因素分析显示,治疗方式可以显著影响预后,单纯化疗发生治疗失败的风险是综合治疗的2.52倍(P=0.004).单因素和多因素分析均未发现总生存时间的影响因素.综合治疗组的急性不良反应发生率较单纯化疗组或单纯放疗组高,主要表现为白细胞减低、胃肠道反应和脱发.结论 对于早期HL,综合治疗可降低治疗失败风险,但不良反应较重.     

颅内生殖细胞瘤立体定向放射外科治疗失败模式和挽救性治疗的初步探讨

目的初步探讨立体定向放射初治颅内生殖细胞瘤的失败模式及挽救性治疗策略。方法回顾性分析17例接受立体定向放射治疗失败的颅内生殖细胞瘤患者的临床资料。研究治疗失败模式及挽救治疗手段。结果治疗失败时间为初治后3~24个月(中位8.5个月)。仅接受立体定向放射治疗的13例患者中,12例出现原发部位复发(6例合并颅内种植,1例合并脊髓种植),另1例出现颅内种植;接受序贯全脑或全中枢照射的4例患者,3例出现原发部位复发和颅内或脊髓种植,1例出现颅内种植。所有患者均接受挽救性治疗。全部患者均行多程含铂方案联合化疗,14例行放疗,3例未放疗,中位随访时间137.0个月,10年生存率为76.5%。结论对于明确诊断或高度怀疑为颅内生殖细胞瘤,初治不宜采用立体定向放射外科治疗作为单一治疗方法,一旦已经实施,应设法联合常规外照射放疗和/或化疗进行补救性治疗。对于复发病例,根据既往治疗情况,选用放化疗等治疗。