Visualization of Prekinetochore Locus on the Centromeric Region of Highly Extended Chromatin Fibers: Does Kinetochore Autoantigen CENP-C Constitute a Kinetochore Organizing Center?

Kinetochore is morphologically defined as a trilaminated, highly differentiated structure at the primary constriction of mitotic chromosomes. This subcellular organella is assumed to be composed of DNA and proteins. Immunoelectron microscopy has shown that centromere autoantigens CENP-C and CENP-B localize to the kinetochore inner plate and the underlying centromeric region respectively. We previously indicated that both are DNA-binding proteins that constitute centromeric heterochromatin throughout the cell cycle. Here, we tried to elucidate how these molecules are involved in the kinetochore/centromere organization in vivo by analyzing their morphological behavior in nuclei. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that CENP-C remained as round discrete dots, whereas CENP-B displayed larger surrounding materials. To examine the CENP-C-binding locus on the genome, we prepared highly extended chromatin fibers and performed simultaneous immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization. We obsreved that centromeric alphoid DNA, targeted by CENP-B, was highly dispersed, whereas the CENP-C antigen persisted as small dots well situated on the fibers. These features reminded us of the ‘ball and cup’ structure that had been presented for ‘prekinetochore’. We propose here that CENP-C constitutes a ‘kinetochore organizing center’ tightly associating with DNA, whereas CENP-B heterochromatin offers the solid support during kinetochore maturation. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

KNL-1 directs assembly of the microtubule-binding interface of the kinetochore in C. elegans

Segregation of the replicated genome during cell division requires kinetochores, mechanochemical organelles that assemble on mitotic chromosomes to connect them to spindle microtubules. CENP-A, a histone H3 variant, and CENP-C, a conserved structural protein, form the DNA-proximal foundation for kinetochore assembly. Using RNA interference-based genomics in Caenorhabditis elegans, we identified KNL-1, a novel kinetochore protein whose depletion, like that of CeCENP-A or CeCENP-C, leads to a "kinetochore-null" phenotype. KNL-1 is downstream of CeCENP-A and CeCENP-C in a linear assembly hierarchy. In embryonic extracts, KNL-1 exhibits substoichiometric interactions with CeCENP-C and forms a near-stoichiometric complex with CeNDC-80 and HIM-10, the C. elegans homologs of Ndc80p/HEC1p and Nuf2p-two widely conserved outer kinetochore components. However, CeNDC-80 and HIM-10 are not functionally equivalent to KNL-1 because their inhibition, although preventing formation of a mechanically stable kinetochore-microtubule interface and causing chromosome missegregation, does not result in a kinetochore-null phenotype. The greater functional importance of KNL-1 may be due to its requirement for targeting multiple components of the outer kinetochore, including CeNDC-80 and HIM-10. Thus, KNL-1 plays a central role in translating the initiation of kinetochore assembly by CeCENP-A and CeCENP-C into the formation of a functional microtubule-binding interface.     

Stu1 inversely regulates kinetochore capture and spindle stability

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae CLASP (CLIP-associated protein) Stu1 is essential for the establishment and maintenance of the mitotic spindle. Furthermore, Stu1 localizes to kinetochores. Here we show that, in prometaphase, Stu1 assembles in an Ndc80-dependent manner exclusively at kinetochores that are not attached to microtubules. Stu1 relocates to microtubules when a captured kinetochore reaches a spindle pole. This relocation does not depend on kinetochore biorientation, but requires a functional DASH complex. Stu1 at detached kinetochores facilitates kinetochore capturing. Furthermore, since most of the nuclear Stu1 is sequestered by one or a few detached kinetochores, the presence of detached kinetochores prevents Stu1 from localizing the spindle, and therefore from stabilizing the spindle. Thus, the sequestering of Stu1 by detached kinetochores serves as a checkpoint that keeps spindle poles in close proximity until all kinetochores are captured. This is likely to facilitate kinetochore biorientation. In agreement with the findings described above, a kinetochore mutant (okp1-52) that fails to release Stu1 from the kinetochore displays a severe spindle defect upon spindle pole body separation, and this defect can be rescued by destroying the okp1-52 kinetochore.     

Mobility of kinetochore proteins measured by FRAP analysis in living cells

The kinetochore is essential for faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis and is assembled through dynamic processes involving numerous kinetochore proteins. Various experimental strategies have been used to understand kinetochore assembly processes. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis is also a useful strategy for revealing the dynamics of kinetochore assembly. In this study, we introduced fluorescence protein-tagged kinetochore protein cDNAs into each endogenous locus and performed FRAP analyses in chicken DT40 cells. Centromeric protein (CENP)-C was highly mobile in interphase, but immobile during mitosis. CENP-C mutants lacking the CENP-A-binding domain became mobile during mitosis. In contrast to CENP-C, CENP-T and CENP-H were immobile during both interphase and mitosis. The mobility of Dsn1, which is a component of the Mis12 complex and directly binds to CENP-C, depended on CENP-C mobility during mitosis. Thus, our FRAP assays provide dynamic aspects of how the kinetochore is assembled.

     

Characterization of the two centromeric proteins CENP-C and MIS12 in Nicotiana species

Centromeres play an important role in chromosome transmission in eukaryotes and comprise specific DNA and proteins that form complexes called kinetochores. In tobacco, although a centromere-specific histone H3 (NtCENH3) and centromeric DNA sequence (Nt2-7) have been identified, no other kinetochore components have been determined. In this study, we isolated and characterized cDNAs encoding two centromeric proteins CENP-C and MIS12 from Nicotiana tabaccum. Two CENP-C homologues, NtCENP-C-1 and -2, isolated from N. tabaccum were similar to CENP-C from N. sylvestris and N. tomentosiformis, respectively. Similarly, two Mis12 homologues, NtMIS12-1 and -2, in N. tabaccum were shown to originate from N. sylvestris and N. tomentosiformis, respectively. Both respective homologues for CENP-C and Mis12 were expressed at the same level. This indicates that in a tetraploid species, N. tabaccum, two ancestral genes encoding the centromeric proteins participate equally in the functioning of centromeres.     

"Holo"er than thou: Chromosome segregation and kinetochore function in C. elegans

Kinetochores are proteinaceous organelles that assemble on centromeric DNA to direct chromosome segregation in all eukaryotes. While many aspects of kinetochore function are conserved, the nature of the chromosomal domain upon which kinetochores assemble varies dramatically between different species. In monocentric eukaryotes, kinetochores assemble on a localized region of each chromosome. In contrast, holocentric species such as the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans have diffuse kinetochores that form along the entire length of their chromosomes. Here, we discuss the nature of chromosome segregation in C. elegans. In addition to reviewing what is known about kinetochore function, chromosome structure, and chromosome movement, we consider the consequences of the specialized holocentric architecture on chromosome segregation.     

Characterization of a Mis12 homologue in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis thaliana</Emphasis>

The centromere/kinetochore represents an important complex on chromosomes that contains a large number of proteins and facilitates accurate chromosome segregation during cell division. Fission yeast Mis12 and its human homologue hMis12 have been identified as essential kinetochore components. Although homologues have been suggested to exist in plants, their function remains to be determined. In this study the full-length cDNA of the Mis12 homologue from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtMIS12) was successfully cloned by RACE-and RT-PCR and the DNA sequence determined. The 238 amino acid sequence deduced from the cDNA contains two conserved blocks and a coiled-coil motif, despite the poor overall similarity to fission yeast and human Mis12. The antibody raised against a partial peptide of AtMIS12 recognized a 27-kDa protein corresponding to the predicted molecular weight. Immunofluorescence labeling using the antibody revealed that AtMIS12 localizes at centromeric regions, like the centromeric histone H3 variant HTR12, throughout the cell cycle. These results indicate that AtMIS12 is a constitutive component of Arabidopsis kinetochores.     

ASURA (PHB2) Is Required for Kinetochore Assembly and Subsequent Chromosome Congression

ASURA (PHB2) knockdown has been known to cause premature loss of sister chromatid cohesion, and disrupt the localization of several outer plate proteins to the kinetochore. As a result, cells are arrested at mitotic phase and chromosomes fail to congress to the metaphase plate. In this study, we further clarified the mechanism underlying ASURA function on chromosome congression. Interestingly, ASURA is not specifically localized at the kinetochore during mitotic phase, unlike other kinetochore proteins which construct the kinetochore. Electron microscopy (EM) observation showed that ASURA is required for proper kinetochore formation. By the partial depletion of ASURA, kinetochore maturation is impaired, and kinetochores showing fibrillar balls without a well-defined outer plates are often observed. Moreover, even when the outer plates of kinetochores are constructed, most showed structures stretched and/or distended from the centromere, which resembled premature kinetochores at prometaphase, indicating that the constructed kinetochore plates are less rigid against tension derived from kinetochore microtubule pulling forces. We concluded that ASURA is an essential protein for complete kinetochore development, although ASURA is not being integrated to the kinetochore. These results highlight the uniqueness of ASURA as a kinetochore protein.     

Chromosome stability is maintained by short intercentromeric distance in functionally dicentric human Robertsonian translocations

While the formation of a dicentric chromosome often leads to chromosome instability, human dicentric Robertsonian translocations usually remain stable. To investigate the basis for this stability, we have examined the centromeres of 15 structurally dicentric rob(13q14q) Robertsonian translocations using immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The immunofluorescence detection of centromere protein C (CENP-C) was used as a marker for centromere function as CENP-C seems to play an essential role in kinetochore structure and stability and was previously shown to be absent from inactive centromeres. In all 15 translocation-containing cell lines, CENP-C was confined to only one of the centromeres of the translocation in a fraction of the cells analyzed. This suggests that centromere inactivation commonly occurs on dicentric Robertsonian translocations and may serve as one mechanism allowing for their stability. However, in the majority of the translocations (12 out of 15), a portion of the cells analyzed displayed CENP-C immunofluorescence at both centromeres, suggesting that both centromeres were active and that the translocation was functionally dicentric. The percentage of cells with CENP-C at both centromeres ranged from 2% to 82%. These results support the hypothesis that the close proximity of two functional centromeres on Robertsonian translocations allows them to remain stable.     

The Consequences of a Non-uniform Tension Across Kinetochores: Lessons From Segregation of Chromosomes in the Permanent Translocation Heterozygote Oenothera

The alternate (zigzag) configuration of the chromosome ring in oenotheras fulfills the requirement of high tension across kinetochores for stability of the configuration and the progression to anaphase. However, also semialternate configurations (two pairs of adjacent kinetochores interspaced among the zigzag) fulfill the requirement of high tension across kinetochores. If only the magnitude of tensile force acting on a kinetochore pair governs the stability of microtubule attachments, the probability of occurrence of the semialternate configurations would be higher than that of fully alternate configurations. Yet the percentage of irregularity in the zigzag configuration is surprisingly low, which means that the semialternate configurations are corrected. The only difference which distinguishes the fully alternate and the semialternate configurations with respect to the tension across kinetochores is that the tension across a kinetochore alternating with its neighbors is rather uniformly distributed over the kinetochore, while there is a gradient of the tension in the kinetochore having a non-alternating neighbor, with low tension on the side of this neighbor. Apparently, a low tension across a part of a kinetochore brings about correction of its attachment to microtubules. This hypothesis fits with the repeat subunit model of the kinetochore; apparently, each subunit can function autonomously in the tension-governed mechanisms, stabilizing its attachment and controlling the metaphase-to-anaphase transition.     

Relevance of kinetochore size and microtubule-binding capacity for stable chromosome attachment during mitosis in PtK1 cells

Chromosomes attach to the mitotic spindle via their kinetochores. The average number of spindle microtubules binding to each kinetochore varies with species, the stage of mitosis, and the length of time that the kinetochore has been attached to the spindle. In this report, we investigate how kinetochore microtubule number varies with kinetochore size and chromosome size in PtK1 cells. From an analysis of serial-section electron micrographs, we determined that the average surface area of metaphase, taxol-treated metaphase, and anaphase kinetochores is 0.16 ± 0.05 m2 (N = 181). Surprisingly, kinetochore microtubules are packed more densely on the smaller kinetochores, as seen by a reduction in the average spacing between kinetochore microtubules from 89 nm to 59 nm. Our interpretation of this result is that PtK1 cells require a minimum kinetochore microtubule-binding capacity for survival during repeated rounds of mitotic division. We estimate the lower limit to be 23 kinetochore microtubules and suggest that this capacity is required to ensure stable attachment during the dynamic and highly stochastic process of kinetochore fiber formation. There is a modest but statistically significant increase in kinetochore microtubule number with chromosome size, indicating that chromosome size is a minor determinant of kinetochore microtubule number.     

Mad1 kinetochore recruitment by Mps1-mediated phosphorylation of Bub1 signals the spindle checkpoint

The spindle checkpoint is a conserved signaling pathway that ensures genomic integrity by preventing cell division when chromosomes are not correctly attached to the spindle. Checkpoint activation depends on the hierarchical recruitment of checkpoint proteins to generate a catalytic platform at the kinetochore. Although Mad1 kinetochore localization is the key regulatory downstream event in this cascade, its receptor and mechanism of recruitment have not been conclusively identified. Here, we demonstrate that Mad1 kinetochore association in budding yeast is mediated by phosphorylation of a region within the Bub1 checkpoint protein by the conserved protein kinase Mps1. Tethering this region of Bub1 to kinetochores bypasses the checkpoint requirement for Mps1-mediated kinetochore recruitment of upstream checkpoint proteins. The Mad1 interaction with Bub1 and kinetochores can be reconstituted in the presence of Mps1 and Mad2. Together, this work reveals a critical mechanism that determines kinetochore activation of the spindle checkpoint.     

Characterization of internal DNA-binding and C-terminal dimerization domains of human centromere/kinetochore autoantigen CENP-C in vitro: role of DNA-binding and self-associating activities in kinetochore organization

Human centromere protein C (CENP-C), a chromosomal component of the inner plate of kinetochores, was originally identified as one of the centromere auto-antigens. In a previous study, we showed that it possesses DNA-binding activity in vitro. Recently, centromere-binding activity was suggested at the C-terminal region in vivo. However, little is known about the role of CENP-C in kinetochore organization. Here, to characterize its biochemical properties, three separate antigenic regions of human CENP-C were expressed in Escherichia coli, affinity purified and used in South-western blotting and chemical cross-linking analyses. We found that the internal DNA-binding domain was composed of two kinds of elements: the core and two flanking stabilizing elements that support the activity. When cross-linked with disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS), the N-terminal region produced the ladder bands of dimerand tetramer: the C-terminal region exclusively produced the dimer band, whereas the internal region was not affected at all. Dimer formation at the C-terminus in the native state was also indicated by gel filtration and the presence of conformation-specific autoantibodies in the patient's sera. These results suggest that human CENP-C consists of three functional units required for kinetochore assembly: a putative N-terminal oligomerization domain, an internal DNA-binding domain and a C-terminal dimerization domain.This revised version was published online in November 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Comparison of Dam tagging and chromatin immunoprecipitation as tools for the identification of the binding sites for <Emphasis Type="Italic">S. pombe</Emphasis> CENP-C

We have established the identity of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue of vertebrate CENP-C and Saccharomyces cerevisiae MIF2p and have used it to compare Dam tagging and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChiP)as tools for the mapping of protein binding sites on DNA. ChiP shows that S. pombe CENP-C binds to the central core and inner repeats of the S. pombe centromere. It binds weakly, however, to the outer repeats. The binding pattern is thus similar to that of S. pombe CENP-A. Dam-tagged S. pombe CENP-C, however, methylates the entire centromere and 5 kb of flanking DNA. This comparison suggests that Dam tagging is less precise as a tool for mapping DNA binding sites than ChiP. We have also used the Dam tagging technique to address the question of whether there is any CENP-C binding to the ribosomal DNA in S. pombe and find none.     

Quantitative proteomic analysis of purified yeast kinetochores identifies a PP1 regulatory subunit

The kinetochore is a macromolecular complex that controls chromosome segregation and cell cycle progression. When sister kinetochores make bioriented attachments to microtubules from opposite poles, the spindle checkpoint is silenced. Biorientation and the spindle checkpoint are regulated by a balance between the Ipl1/Aurora B protein kinase and the opposing activity of protein phosphatase I (PP1). However, little is known about the regulation of PP1 localization and activity at the kinetochore. Here, we developed a method to purify centromere-bound kinetochores and used quantitative proteomics to identify the Fin1 protein as a PP1 regulatory subunit. The Fin1/PP1 complex is regulated by phosphorylation and 14–3–3 protein binding. When Fin1 is mislocalized, bipolar spindles fail to assemble but the spindle checkpoint is inappropriately silenced due to PP1 activity. These data suggest that Fin1 is a PP1 regulatory subunit whose spatial and temporal activity must be precisely controlled to ensure genomic stability.     

Meikin‐associated polo‐like kinase specifies Bub1 distribution in meiosis I

In meiosis I, sister chromatids are captured by microtubules emanating from the same pole (mono‐orientation), and centromeric cohesion is protected throughout anaphase. Shugoshin, which is localized to centromeres depending on the phosphorylation of histone H2A by Bub1 kinase, plays a central role in protecting meiotic cohesin Rec8 from separase cleavage. Another key meiotic kinetochore factor, meikin, may regulate cohesion protection, although the underlying molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we show that fission yeast Moa1 (meikin), which associates stably with CENP‐C during meiosis I, recruits Plo1 (polo‐like kinase) to the kinetochores and phosphorylates Spc7 (KNL1) to accumulate Bub1. Consequently, in contrast to the transient kinetochore localization of mitotic Bub1, meiotic Bub1 persists at kinetochores until anaphase I. The meiotic Bub1 pool ensures robust Sgo1 (shugoshin) localization and cohesion protection at centromeres by cooperating with heterochromatin protein Swi6, which binds and stabilizes Sgo1. Furthermore, molecular genetic analyses show a hierarchical regulation of centromeric cohesion protection by meikin and shugoshin that is important for establishing meiosis‐specific chromosome segregation. We provide evidence that the meiosis‐specific Bub1 regulation is conserved in mouse.     

Kinetochore–microtubule interactions during cell division

Proper segregation of chromosomes during cell division is essential for the maintenance of genetic stability. During this process chromosomes must establish stable functional interactions with microtubules through the kinetochore, a specialized protein structure located on the surface of the centromeric heterochromatin. Stable attachment of kinetochores to a number of microtubules results in the formation of a kinetochore fibre that mediates chromosome movement. How the kinetochore fibre is formed and how chromosome motion is produced and regulated remain major questions in cell biology. Here we look at some of the history of research devoted to the study of kinetochore-microtubule interaction and attempt to identify significant advances in the knowledge of the basic processes. Ultrastructural work has provided substantial insights into the structure of the kinetochore and associated microtubules during different stages of mitosis. Also, recent in-vivo studies have probed deep into the dynamics of kinetochore-attached microtubules suggesting possible models for the way in which kinetochores harness the capacity of microtubules to do work and turn it into chromosome motion. Much of the research in recent years suggests that indeed multiple mechanisms are involved in both formation of the k-fibre and chromosome motion. Thus, rather than moving to a unified theory, it has become apparent that most cell types have the capacity to build the spindle using multiple and probably redundant mechanisms.     

Human centromeres and neocentromeres show identical distribution patterns of >20 functionally important kinetochore-associated proteins

Using combined immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis we have extensively characterized the proteins associating with two different homologue human neocentromeres at interphase and prometaphase/metaphase, and compared these directly with those found with normal human centromeres. Antisera to CENP-A, CENP-B, CENP-C, CENP-E, CENP-F, INCENP, CLIP-170, dynein, dynactin subunits p150 (Glued) and Arp1, MCAK, Tsg24, p55CDC, HZW10, HBUB1, HBUBR1, BUB3, MAD2, ERK1, 3F3/2, topoisomerase II and a murine HP1 homologue, M31, were used in immuno-fluorescence experiments in conjunction with FISH employing specific DNA probes to clearly identify neocentromeric DNA. We found that except for the total absence of CENP-B binding, neocentromeres are indistinguishable from their alpha satellite-containing counterparts in terms of protein composition and distribution. This suggests that the DNA base of a potential centromeric locus is of minimal importance in determining the overall structure of a functional kinetochore and that, once seeded, the events leading to functional kinetochore formation occur independently of primary DNA sequence.