Emergency Physicians' Attitudes Toward the Emergency Nurse Practitioner Role: Validation Versus Rejection

A qualitative grounded theory approach was used in this study, which examined the attitudes of a group of emergency physicians toward collaborative practice with emergency nurse practitioners. Interviews were conducted with five physicians who were not currently working with nurse practitioners. Responses were coded, and a substantive theory model of dependent collaboration emerged. The physicians supported the emergency nurse practitioner role on the grounds that it be supervised in the traditional fashion by the physician. Concerns regarding education, trust, liability, and capability were identified. Deficits in knowledge regarding training and the role/function of nurse practitioners were also identified.     

Counseling medical patients about cigarette smoking: a comparison of the impact of training on nurse practitioners and physicians

Health providers believe that eliminating smoking is an important health promotion goal, but physicians and nurse practitioners may differ in the implementation of that belief. To determine whether nurse practitioners or physicians were more likely to counsel smokers to quit smoking, 12 internal medicine nurse practitioners (100 percent female) and 40 internal medicine physicians (30 percent female) were studied at four San Francisco Bay-area Kaiser Permanente Medical Centers, both before and after training in smoking-cessation counseling. In addition, exit phone surveys of at least 15 smokers per participant were completed as soon as possible following an office visit to the participant (269 nurse practitioner patients; 948 physician patients). It was found that nurse practitioners discussed smoking with patients more often than did physicians (64 percent vs. 50 percent; p less than 0.001), asked patients more often whether they were interested in quitting (49 percent vs. 40 percent; p less than 0.01), distributed more smoking-cessation literature to patients (37 percent vs. 25 percent; p less than 0.001) and made more follow-up appointments about smoking (36 percent vs. 19 percent; p less than 0.001). These differences in counseling behavior between the two groups were not explained by differences in patient characteristics of the two groups. The authors concluded that, given the same training, nurse practitioners are more likely to counsel smokers about quitting than are physicians.     

Using cost-analysis techniques to measure the value of nurse practitioner care

Nurse practitioners are in a unique position to deliver high-quality care to a variety of populations and are being utilized in many countries worldwide. Although certain aspects of the nurse practitioner role may differ from country to country, limited financial support and competition for access to patients make it incumbent on nurse practitioners to document the cost-effectiveness of their care. Cost analysis, a business tool that can be used by any practitioner in any health care system, was used to examine business practices of an academic-based nurse-managed centre. In order for this tool to be effective, nurse practitioners must become comfortable with using cost-analysis techniques in their practices. Linking outcome data with cost data was found to be one method for explicating the value of nurse practitioner practice. Nurse practitioners must also recognize that they are competing with primary-care physician practices and other primary health-care practices. It is vital for nurse practitioners to document both the quality and the costs of their care in order to compete with physicians and other health care providers, in order to influence policy and other health-care decision makers.     

Physician receptivity to nurse practitioners: a study of the correlates of the delegation of clinical responsibility.

A survey to measure physician receptivity to nurse practitioners was conducted in North Carolina in 1973. All North Carolina physicians were asked to rate a list of 35 clinical tasks of varying levels of difficulty and responsibility according to their willingness to delegate these tasks to nurse practitioners. Using eight items from this list that were good discriminants of physician attitudes towards delegating responsibility, task delegation scores were correlated with physician characteristics and their responses to questions about recruitment, training, reimbursement, and willingness to hire nurse practitioners. Thirty-four per cent of the respondents would hire a nurse practitioner, whereas 52% approved of the concept but would not hire one. Physicians who had previously worked with a nurse practitioner were more willing to hire one and had a higher task delegation score. Sixty-eight per cent of respondents would share their load with nurse practitioners in their offices, while 6% would have them work in satellite clinics away from the physicians' offices. Most physicians wanted their own nurse trained as a nurse practitioner in a program that combined a didactic course at a medical center with on-the-job training. The authors conclude that there is a potential demand for nurse practitioners in North Carolina and that the training program must prepare the nurse practitioners for the tasks physicians are willing to delegate to them.     

Impact of a designated hepatology nurse on the clinical course and quality of life of patients treated with rebetron therapy for chronic hepatitis C.

A two- to three-fold increase in mortality from hepatitis C is predicted in the next 10-20 years as the largest cohort of patients age. More qualified providers are needed to care for this population. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a hepatology nurse practitioner as compared to care by a physician on the quality of life and treatment outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Seventy-five patients with chronic hepatitis C were assigned to either a nurse practitioner or physician and asked to complete a SF-36 Health Survey quarterly to measure their perceived quality of life.Two-sided t-tests comparing the quality of life scores in the physician and nurse practitioner groups at weeks 1, 12, and 24 were calculated using SPSS version 12.0 (Chicago, IL). Although marginal differences between physicians and nurse practitioners were noted for physical function at week 1, bodily pain at week 12, and role physical at week 24 by the patients, no statistically significant differences were observed overall in the quality of life scores reported by the patients according to healthcare provider. The treatment outcome data for the nurse practitioner groups showed 12/25 (48%) of patients with genotype 1 achieved a sustained virologic response as did 13/22 (59%) of patients with genotype 2 or 3. In the physician groups, 11/27 (41%) of patients with genotype 1 achieved a sustained virologic response as did 14/23 (61%) of patients with genotype 2 or 3. These results suggest nurse practitioners can provide effective care to the chronic hepatitis C population.     

Outcomes of tube thoracostomies performed by advanced practice providers vs trauma surgeons

BACKGROUND: The role of advanced registered nurse practitioners and physician assistants in emergency departments, trauma centers, and critical care is becoming more widely accepted. These personnel, collectively known as advanced practice providers, expand physicians' capabilities and are being increasingly recruited to provide care and perform invasive procedures that were previously performed exclusively by physicians. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the quality of tube thoracostomies performed by advanced practice providers is comparable to that performed by trauma surgeons and to ascertain whether the complication rates attributable to tube thoracostomies differ on the basis of who performed the procedure. METHODS: Retrospective blinded reviews of patients' charts and radiographs were conducted to determine differences in quality indicators, complications, and outcomes of tube thoracostomies by practitioner type: trauma surgeons vs advanced practice providers. RESULTS: Differences between practitioner type in insertion complications, complications requiring additional interventions, hospital length of stay, and morbidity were not significant. The only significant difference was a complication related to placement of the tube: when the tube extended caudad, toward the feet, from the insertion site. Interrater reliability ranged from good to very good. CONCLUSIONS: Use of advanced practice providers provides consistent and quality tube thoracostomies. Employment of these practitioners may be a safe and reasonable solution for staffing trauma centers.     

The rural family nurse practitioner: the quest for role-identity

This study was conceived as an inquiry into the marginal nature of the rural family nurse practitioner's role. Data collection began with administration of a questionnaire to all family nurse practitioners in New Mexico for the purpose of selecting a subgroup for in-depth study. Eight rural family nurse practitioners were identified who were practicing as primary health care providers with a physician on-site 20% of the time or less. This group was studied over a period of 3 months. The major outcome of the study was the delineation of three highly interactive clusters of variables which appear to influence the development of a role-identity: personal attributes; organizational factors and inter-personal relations. Demographic data collected resulted in a profile indicating that the 'average' rural family nurse practitioner in New Mexico is a single 'Anglo' female between 35 and 44 years of age with a BSc in nursing and a strong religious background. Hypothetically, as agreement on role-expectations and behaviour is increased between the rural family nurse practitioner and the role-set, increased institutionalization of the role can be expected to occur.     

Who is a nurse practitioner? Processes of care and patients' and physicians' perceptions.

During a repeat of a previous study of nurse practitioners conducted at the University of Kansas, an opportunity occurred to examine the impact of two different styles of care provided by nurse practitioners on patients and physicians with whom they worked. The two nurse practitioners involved had similar backgrounds in terms of work experience. The participated in the same training program for nurse practitioners, practice in the same environment, and cared for patients randomly allocated to one or the other practitioner. One practitioner saw her patients more often and for longer periods of time, ordered more medications, and less often sought physician consultation. She also was most optimistic regarding the impact of her services on patients' conditions. The other was more dependent upon physicians for validation of her actions. Physicians did not distinguish between the two practitioners in terms of their performance. However, patients cared for by the practitioner whose behavior suggested an integration of medical and nursing care processes saw nurses as a more common source of information about illness and demonstrated more significant shifts in preferences for services provided by nurses rather than physicians. No significant changes were noted from pretest values among patients cared for by the other nurse practitioner.     

Objective and subjective measures of the quality of managed care in nursing homes

BACKGROUND: The number of nursing home (NH) residents enrolled in managed care plans (HMO) will increase, and there is concern that the quality of their medical care may be compromised by cost-containment pressures. In this study, we evaluated the medical care of residents enrolled in 3 health maintenance organizations (HMO) that developed specific long-term care programs. OBJECTIVES: To compare the medical care received by NH residents enrolled in HMO and Fee-for-Service (FFS) plans with both objective process of care and consumer perception (subjective) measures. To describe the relationship between the objective and subjective measures. MEASURES: Number of primary care visits per month; process of medical care for 2 geriatric tracer conditions (falls, fevers); family and residents' perceptions of the adequacy of sickness episode management; and the frequency of primary provider visits. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental. RESULTS: HMO residents received more timely and appropriate responses to falls and fevers than did FFS residents. HMO residents also received more frequent routine visits by a primary care provider team consisting of a physician and nurse practitioner. Consumer perceptions of quality did not differ between the HMO and FFS groups. Families within both groups were significantly more positive than were residents about the frequency of visits by both physicians and nurse practitioners. Within the HMO group, both families and residents were more positive about the frequency of nurse practitioner visits than were physician visits even when the frequency of visits by the 2 providers were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Although the medical care received by HMO residents was better on most objective process measures than that received by FFS residents, consumer perceptions of care did not detect those differences. NH residents and families have different perceptions about the adequacy of visits by physicians and nurse practitioners, and both families and residents appear to have different expectations concerning how often they want physicians to visit as compared with nurse practitioners.     

Nominations for Excellence: Collegial Advocacy for Nurse Practitioners

This study examined physician nomination data submitted for Syntex Nurse Practitioner of the Year Awards for 1988, 1989, and 1990. The physicians identified nurse practitioner contributions to patient care, community service/outreach, and education and research. A content analysis of the text data yielded themes within four major domains that described outstanding nurse practitioners in mutual practice relationships with physicians. The domains were clinical expertise, holistic caring, patient-centered activism, and leadership. The findings in this study indicated that physicians value the contributions of nurse practitioners that enhance the quality and scope of health care for patients within a mutual practice.     

New Models for the Delivery of Musculoskeletal Care in Rural Communities

The prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions carries an associated influence on comorbidity. Rural communities have greater health comorbidities, poorer health outcomes, and difficulty recruiting and retaining physicians than their urban counterparts. It is unrealistic to rely on the physician workforce alone to provide adequate musculoskeletal care in rural communities. Nurse practitioners are more likely to practice in rural areas and provide care for vulnerable populations. Strengthening the health care workforce through postgraduate nurse practitioner education can help provide highly trained clinicians as continuity providers in rural communities.     

Collaborative practice in health systems change: the Nova Scotia experience with the Strengthening Primary Care Initiative

Recently attention has been focussed on the significance of primary care to the Canadian healthcare system. Nova Scotia. Like other provinces, is seeking ways to improve the healthcare that it provides within a financially constrained publicly funded system. The Strengthening Primary Care Initiative in Nova Scotia (SPCI) was a primary care demonstration project to evaluate specific goals related to primary care. Although the provincial government conceived the SPCI, the approach to its planning and implementation was participatory and consultative. Funded through the federal Health Transition Fund (HTF) (Health Canada 2002) and the government of Nova Scotia, the SPCI involved changes in four communities over a three-year period (2000-2002). These changes included the introduction of a primary healthcare nurse practitioner in collaborative practice with one or more family physicians; remuneration of the family physician(s) with methods other than a solely fee-for-service (FFS) arrangement; and the introduction and utilization of a computerized patient medical record. The SPCI was committed to a consultative process with stakeholders, and this gave rise to several challenges. Initially there was disagreement on the requirement for nurse practitioners at each of the demonstration sites. The Minister of Health confirmed that a nurse practitioner was a required component at each demonstration site. Differences in perspectives on the role of allied health professionals in the SPCI were encountered, and the significance of the role pharmacists have in primary care was not fully appreciated until after the SPCI had started. At the time the SPCI began there was no legislation for nurse practitioners in Nova Scotia; therefore, an approval mechanism for nurse practitioner practice was authorized through the provincial regulatory bodies for nursing and medicine. Malpractice and liability issues, particularly on the part of providers who had never worked with nurse practitioners before, were an initial concern. Recruitment of nurse practitioners into the three rural sites mirrored the difficulties with recruitment of healthcare providers encountered in other parts of rural Canada. The authors discuss their perspectives on the challenges related to interdisciplinary collaboration in health systems change that were encountered during the planning and implementation of the SPCI. Although nurse practitioner Legislation has existed in Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador for several years, many provinces are grappling with the challenges associated with the introduction of nurse practitioners and collaborative practice. This paper conveys the experience of one province and will be of interest to administrators, educators and practitioners elsewhere in Canada who are engaged in primary healthcare renewal.     

Urgent care medicine and the role of the APP within this specialty

The field of urgent care medicine offers an additional medical pathway for patients who have immediate, but non-life-threatening, medical concerns. Urgent care medicine offers a more varied set of resources and services than a physician office setting, with more flexible hours. This gives patients an opportunity to not have to go to the emergency department for non-emergent care. As a newer specialty within the medical field, certain roles of healthcare providers other than physicians are becoming established, including the advanced practice provider (APP). An APP is a nurse practitioner or a physician assistant, who is licensed to treat under the supervision of a physician. Nurse practitioners’ (NP) and physician assistants’ (PA) role in urgent care is often seen as an effective, lower cost option to manage common acute minor illnesses seen in the community. Benefits to utilizing APPs in urgent care include decreasing costs to both the patient and health system, enhancing the physician's ability to see more patients, and decreasing wait times, all while continuing to maintain high standards of care. The goal of the authors within this publication is to discuss urgent care as a specialty and further explore the role of advanced practice providers within this setting.     

Family physician/nurse practitioner: stories of collaboration

AIMS: This paper presents the experiences of nurse practitioners and family physicians working in collaborative practice at four Canadian rural primary care agencies. It focuses on the qualitative segment of a larger study examining the impact of an educational intervention on interprofessional practice. BACKGROUND: Growing awareness of the importance of health promotion and disease prevention, the increased complexity of community-based care, and the need to use scarce human healthcare resources, especially family physicians, far more efficiently and effectively, have resulted in increased emphasis on primary healthcare renewal in Canada. Key to primary healthcare renewal is care delivery through interdisciplinary teams that include nurse practitioners. METHODS: Narrative analysis, a form of interpretive analysis that respects the integrity of the stories told by participants, was chosen as the strategy to examine the narrative data gathered in two sets of interviews with the nurse practitioners and family physicians. The study was undertaken during 2000. RESULTS: Thirteen family physicians and five nurse practitioners with diverse educational backgrounds and varied experience with collaboration participated in the qualitative component of the study. A number of issues related to working in a shared practice were identified in nurse practitioner and family physician interviews across the research sites. The themes identified in participants' stories included issues related to the scope of practice, emphasizing the importance of role clarity and trust, the ideological difference regarding disease prevention and health promotion, differences in perceptions about the operation of collaborative practice, and the understanding that collaborative relationships evolve. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of nurse practitioners and family physicians in a common clinical practice without some form of orientation process does not produce collaborative practice. Educational strategies related to role expectations are necessary to facilitate the development of care delivery partnerships characterized by interdependent practice.     

Nurse practitioners and physicians: patients' perceived health and satisfaction with care

The advent of managed care has created changes in the health care environment and nurse practitioners have found a need to evaluate their care. Perceived health and patient satisfaction were measured in a multiethnic sample of 160 clinic patients, ages 18 to 89, in a managed care setting. Results of the Medical Outcomes Study SF-20 and the Nurse Practitioner Satisfaction Instrument indicated no statistically significant difference in perceived health and satisfaction with care, whether the care was given by a nurse practitioner or a primary care physician. The findings warrant further study and may mean that nurse practitioners placed in managed care environments can be expected to perform as effectively as they have in non-managed care environments.     

The accuracy of adult limb radiograph interpretation by emergency nurse practitioners: A prospective comparative study

Background

One of the extensions to practice for the emergency nurse practitioner role is to appropriately order and interpret radiographs in the emergency department.

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare the accuracy in interpreting isolated adult limb radiographs between emergency nurse practitioners and emergency physicians.

Design

A prospective comparative study was undertaken.

Setting

Emergency department in a large metropolitan hospital.

Participants

200 adult patients with isolated limb injuries were consented.

Methods

Six emergency nurse practitioners and ten emergency physicians participated. One emergency physician and emergency nurse practitioner independently clinically assessed each patient, determined the need for radiograph and separately recorded their interpretation of the radiograph as either definite fracture, no fracture or possible fracture. A single consultant radiologist reviewed each radiograph and their interpretation was seen as the gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity of emergency physicians and emergency nurse practitioners were calculated. To measure the level of agreement between the two-clinician groups, the weighted Kappa statistic was used.

Results

The sensitivity for the emergency nurse practitioners was 91% and 88% for the emergency physicians. The specificity for the emergency nurse practitioners was 85% and for the emergency physicians 91%. The weighted Kappa on the presence of a fracture between the emergency nurse practitioners and emergency physicians was 0.83.

Conclusions

This study validates the clinical and diagnostic skills of emergency nurse practitioners assessed in the interpretation of isolated adult limb injury radiographs.     

Nurse Practitioner Managed Care for Persons with HIV Infection

This exploratory study examined whether outcomes of care for HIV-infected patients are related to whether the patient's primary provider is a physician (MD) or a nurse practitioner (NP). Functional status, symptom occurrence, self management, health service use and patients' assessment of their care were evaluated for 87 HIV-infected patients in a teaching hospital outpatient setting. NP patients were three times as likely to report their health status as only fair or poor (odds-ratio=3.06, p=.028), and reported significantly more unpleasant symptoms over a four-week period. Despite being in poorer health than patients cared for by physicians, NP patients functioned at comparable levels and used no more health care services than MD patients. NP patients reported 45 percent fewer problems with their care (p=0.003). Findings suggest that more extensive use of nurse practitioners could safely enhance access to care for persons with HIV-related illnesses.     

The Acute Care Nurse Practitioner in Collaborative Practice

Nurse-physician relationships remain, for the most part, hierarchical in nature. A hierarchical structure allows the person at the top, most notably the physician, the highest level of authority and power for decision making. Other health care providers are delegated various tasks related to the medical plan of care. One role of nonmedical health care providers, including nurses, is to support the medical plan of care and increase the productivity of physicians. Medical centers have house staff, usually interns and residents, who work collaboratively with the attending physicians in care delivery. At one medical center, a shortage of medical house staff for internal medicine prompted the development and evaluation of an alternative service. The alternative service utilized master prepared, certified nurse practitioners on a nonteaching service to provide care for selected types of medical patients. Physicians consulted with nurse practitioners, but retained decision-making authority concerning patient admission to the service. This paper describes the development and evaluation of an alternative service based on a collaborative practice model and the role of nurse practitioners working under such a model. Discussion includes suggestions for process guideline development for organizations that want to improve collaborative practice relationships between unit nursing staff, nurse practitioners, and physicians.     

Comparing HMO physicians' attitudes towards NPs and PAs

This study examined the attitudes of physicians working in health maintenance organizations toward the use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. It also explored some of the underlying reasons for these attitudes: effect upon quality of care, risk of malpractice, role threat and gender bias. The setting was a health maintenance organization serving 270,000 members. The data were derived from a survey of physicians' attitudes and behavior. Physicians from internal medicine, pediatrics and obstetrics-gynecology were the study population. Internists and pediatricians had favorable attitudes toward both nurse practitioners and physician assistants. Obstetrician-gynecologists had somewhat less favorable attitudes. Physicians in all three specialties favored nurse practitioners more than physician assistants. Physicians felt that nurse practitioners were more likely to increase the quality of care and less likely to increase the risk of malpractice. Nurse practitioners were not seen as a greater role threat. Some gender bias appeared to be present, but it did not appear to constrain the use of nurse practitioners. Large, multi-specialty, prepaid group practice health maintenance organizations may be favorable settings for nurse practitioners and physician assistants to practice primary care.     

Two explanations of nurse practitioner interactions and participatory decision making with physicians

The purpose of this study was to test a theoretical model that integrated two explanations of nurse practitioner interaction and participatory decision making with physicians. The two explanations were derived from technology theory and social exchange theory. Nurse practitioners (N = 38) responded to a four-scale magnitude estimation instrument measuring each of four concepts in the model: complexity, expected benefit-cost ratio of interaction, interaction, and participatory decision making. Predictions derived from both theories were supported. Nurse practitioner decisions about interaction with physicians were influenced by the dynamics of social exchange with physicians, as well as the technological requirements of primary care. The findings offer nurse practitioners new strategies for managing professional exchanges on behalf of their patients.