Lactose Malabsorption and Intolerance in the Elderly

Background: Lactase activity declines with age in rats, but it is not clear whether this model is also shared by humans. Few studies have evaluated lactose intolerance and malabsorption in the elderly and no definite conclusions can be drawn. The aim of our study was therefore to verify the impact of age on lactose intolerance and malabsorption. Methods: Eighty-four healthy subjects took part in the study. Thirty-three were < 65 years, 17 were between 65 and 74 years and 34 were > 74 years. All the subjects underwent a preliminary evaluation of intestinal gas production capacity and oro-cecal transit time by H 2 /CH 4 breath test after lactulose. After a 3-day period, an H 2 /CH 4 breath test after lactose was performed. The occurrence of intolerance symptoms during the test and in the 24 h after the test was recorded. Results: Breath H 2 and CH 4 excretion parameters at fasting and after lactulose did not differ between the three groups. Cumulative breath H 2 excretion after lactose was higher in subjects > 74 years than in subjects < 65 years and in subjects aged 65-74 years, while no difference was found between the latter two groups. In subjects > 74 years, the prevalence of lactose malabsorption was higher than in the other two groups, while no significant difference was observed between subjects < 65 years and subjects aged 65-74 years. Within the malabsorber subjects, the prevalence of lactose intolerance was higher in subjects < 65 years than in those aged 65-74 years and in those aged > 74 years. No significant difference was found between the latter two groups. No difference was found between the three groups in terms of daily calcium intake and a significant negative correlation between symptom score and daily calcium intake was only found in the group of subjects aged < 65 years. Conclusions: As age increases, the prevalence of lactose malabsorption shows an increase while the prevalence of intolerance symptoms among malabsorbers shows a decrease. Accordingly, daily calcium intake was similar among the adults and elderly studied.     

Breath testing to evaluate lactose intolerance in irritable bowel syndrome correlates with lactulose testing and may not reflect true lactose malabsorption

OBJECTIVES: An increased prevalence of lactose intolerance is seen in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Recently, we demonstrated a high prevalence of abnormal lactulose breath test results in IBS suggesting bacterial overgrowth. Because symptoms of lactose intolerance result from bacterial fermentation, the purpose of this study was to determine whether an abnormal lactose breath test is reflective of malabsorption or early presentation to bacteria. METHODS: Subjects with diarrhea-predominant IBS were enrolled. On day 1, subjects underwent a lactulose breath test after an overnight fast. Within 1 wk, subjects returned after fasting for a lactose breath test with simultaneous blood glucose measurements every 15 min to complete a lactose tolerance test (LTT). Symptoms were evaluated 3 h after lactose administration. RESULTS: Twenty subjects completed the study. One subject inadvertently received dextrose through the intravenous and was excluded. Of the remaining 19 subjects, three (16%) had an abnormal LTT suggesting malabsorption. In all, 10 subjects (53%) had an abnormal lactose breath test, 14 (74%) had an abnormal lactulose breath test, and 11 (58%) had symptoms after lactose administration. The agreement with symptoms was moderate (kappa = 0.47) and fair (kappa = 0.24) when compared to the lactose breath test and LTT, respectively. There was a fair correlation between lactose breath test and LTT (kappa = 0.29). However, lactose breath test hydrogen levels >166 ppm were universally predictive of abnormal LTT. Finally, a significant correlation was seen between the hydrogen production on lactose and lactulose breath test (r = 0.56, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lactose breath testing in IBS subjects does not seem to reflect malabsorption; it may be an indicator of abnormal lactulose breath test, suggesting bacterial overgrowth.     

Lactose malabsorption and intolerance and peak bone mass

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lactose malabsorption per se is not associated with alterations of bone mineral density (BMD) or calcium intake, but when intolerance symptoms are present a lower calcium intake and reduction of BMD values are evident. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether lactose intolerance interferes with the achievement of an adequate peak bone mass in young adults. METHODS: Of 103 enrolled healthy subjects, 55 proved to be lactose malabsorbers with H(2) breath test after lactose administration, and 29 of them experienced intolerance symptoms (diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating, flatulence). Lumbar and femoral BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was measured, and calcium intake and biochemical indices of bone and mineral metabolism were evaluated. RESULTS: Lumbar and femoral BMD, calcium intake, and mineral metabolism did not differ between malabsorbers and absorbers, although among malabsorbers, intolerant subjects showed significant alterations of all these parameters in comparison with tolerant subjects. A strict correlation was evident between BMD values and both severity of symptoms and calcium intake and between calcium intake and severity of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Lactose intolerance prevents the achievement of an adequate peak bone mass and may, therefore, predispose to severe osteoporosis.     

Lactose malabsorption and rate of bone loss in older women.

OBJECTIVES: to study the prevalence of lactose malabsorption with increasing age and to determine whether lactose malabsorbers consume less dietary calcium, have lower bone mineral density or display faster bone loss than lactose absorbers. DESIGN: 80 healthy Caucasian women aged 40-79 years (20 per decade) were studied for 1 year. METHODS: breath hydrogen exhalation was measured for 3 after a 50 g oral lactose challenge. Bone density was assessed in the radius, femoral neck, lumbar spine and total body by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and dietary calcium intake was estimated by 4-day diet records and food-frequency questionnaires. RESULTS: lactose malabsorption rose with age (15% in those aged 40-59 years versus 50% in those aged 60-79; P < 0.01). Malabsorbers aged 70-79 years consumed significantly less calcium than lactose absorbers of this age (P < 0.05). Baseline total body calcium values were lower in lactose malabsorbers (n=26) than in lactose absorbers (n=54) but age-adjustment eliminated this difference. Bone change (% per year) was correlated with dietary calcium intake at the femoral neck and trochanter (P < 0.05) but was not statistically greater in malabsorbers than in absorbers. CONCLUSIONS: the ability to absorb lactose declines in the 7th decade. This may contribute to decreased dietary intakes of milk products and calcium in elderly women. However, lactose malabsorption without reduction in calcium intake has little effect on bone mineral density or the rate of bone loss.     

Concordance of indirect methods for the detection of lactose malabsorption in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects

In order to collect data on (1) the prevalence of lactose malabsorption and (2) the value of indirect diagnostic methods for hypolactasia in diabetics, we compared lactose tolerance tests using serum glucose, serum galactose (after oral ethanol intake) and breath hydrogen excretion as diagnostic cutoff in 144 nondiabetic and 46 diabetic subjects. A good rate of concordance was found for the hydrogen breath test and galactose-dependent lactose tolerance test. The glucose-dependent lactose tolerance test was found to be of satisfactory diagnostic value in nondiabetic subjects and was useless for diagnostic purposes in diabetics. Lactose malabsorption was no more frequent in diabetics than in controls and lactose intolerance was found to be less frequent in the diabetic group. A distinction between hypolactasia and other gastrointestinal disorders in diabetics is possible by ambulatory indirect tests.     

Breath hydrogen excretion after lactose and whole milk ingestion. A prospective comparison in lactase deficiency

As the 50 g of lactose in the usual clinical test is unphysiologic both because it is equivalent to 1 L milk and because the usual dietary intake is not the purified sugar, but milk, we undertook a prospective comparison of the absorption of lactose after both lactose and milk ingestion with an equivalent lactose content. We studied 51 healthy volunteers, using the hydrogen breath test technique. All patients received 25 g lactose in aqueous solution. Subjects with an abnormal test had the test repeated with 500 ml whole cow's milk, whereas subjects with a normal test repeated the test after ingesting the unabsorbable sugar lactulose to detect the capacity of their colonic flora to produce the gas. Symptoms of gastrointestinal intolerance were also recorded. Compared to an equivalent lactose amount, milk lactose is better absorbed (8% of the entire population malabsorbed 500 ml whole milk, whereas 33.33% malabsorbed 25 g lactose) and induces intolerance in fewer subjects. We conclude that milk rather than pure lactose must be used in clinical evaluation of lactose malabsorption and intolerance.     

Lactase deficiency and lactose intolerance-related symptoms in adult healthy subjects from western France]

The prevalence of lactase deficiency (LD) and lactose intolerance is not well known in France. Using breath hydrogen and methane analysis after 50 g oral lactose load, we investigated the prevalences of LD, lactose intolerance, and methane producer status in 102 healthy adults born in western France, and we examined the relationships between these parameters and the daily milk consumption. In 10 subjects with LD and lactose intolerance, we studied the reproducibility of the lactose hydrogen breath test results for the diagnosis of LD and lactose intolerance and estimated the quantity of lactose malabsorbed in comparison with the lactulose hydrogen breath test. The prevalence of LD was 23.4 percent and symptoms of lactose intolerance were observed in 50 percent of the 24 subjects with LD. The daily milk consumption was not significantly different in the 24 subjects with LD and in the 78 subjects without LD (281 +/- 197 vs 303 +/- 217 ml/24 h). The prevalence of methane producer status was 42.1 percent. The symptomatic group of lactose malabsorbers (n = 12) was characterized by a shorter lactose mouth to caecum transit time (39 +/- 20 vs 88 +/- 48 min; P less than 0.05), and more marked hydrogen production (6.1 +/- 2.3 vs 3.4 +/- 2.4 10(3) ppm.min; P less than 0.04). In the 10 subjects with LD and lactose intolerance, the hydrogen breath test was reproducible for diagnosis of LD and lactose intolerance, and for hydrogen production. The quantity of lactose malabsorbed was 60 percent. In France, symptoms of lactose intolerance are not severe and do not affect the daily consumption of milk and dairy products.     

Fructose and Sorbitol Malabsorption in Ambulatory Patients with Functional Dyspepsia Comparison with Lactose Maldigestion/Malabsorption

The aim of this study was to study sugarmaldigestion/malabsorption in patients with functionaldyspepsia using H breath testing. End-expiratory breathH after separate 2 challenges with lactose (25 g), fructose (25 g), and sorbitol (5 g) were usedto determine malabsorption, as well as small boweltransit time (SBTT). Five hundred twenty patients withfunctional dyspepsia received all three challenges. Smaller groups were also tested after lactulose(10 g, N = 36) and glucose (50 g, N = 90) challenges.Fructose and sorbitol were closely linked with respectto absorption and malabsorption status. Only in the case of lactose maldigestion/malabsorption wasthere a greater than random prevalence of malabsorption(P < 0.001) for fructose and sorbitol. In contrast tolactose, ethnic origin did not influence fructose or sorbitol malabsorption, and femalespredominated among fructose and sorbitol malabsorbers.In Jews, the prevalence of lactosemaldigestion/malabsorption decreased in the age group of25-55 and subsequently rose after 55, while fructose and sorbitolmalabsorption decreased progressively with advancingage. With respect to small bowel transit time (SBTT), inthe case of sorbitol and lactulose, it was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than those for fructoseand lactose. Multiple sugar malabsorptions are commonwhen lactose maldigestion/malabsorption ispresent.     

Lactose malabsorption, irritable bowel syndrome and self-reported milk intolerance

BACKGROUND: The relationship between lactose malabsorption, irritable bowel syndrome and development of intestinal symptoms is unclear, especially when the ingested dose of milk is small. Thus, the role of hydrogen breath testing in the diagnostic work-up of patients with nonspecific intestinal symptoms is still debated. AIMS: To establish the relationship between lactose malabsorption, severe self-reported milk intolerance, irritable bowel syndrome and related symptoms. METHODS: The prevalence of lactose malabsorption was prospectively assessed by means of a hydrogen breath test in 839 patients (503 with irritable bowel syndrome, based on the Rome criteria, regularly consuming milk, and 336 subjects who identified themself as milk intolerant, after an oral load of 25 g lactose). The test was considered "positive" when a hydrogen peak exceeding 20 ppm over baseline values was observed in two or more samples. Attempts were also made to establish whether the predominant presenting symptom (diarrhoea, constipation, alternating diarrhoea and constipation, pain and gaseousness) might be helpful in predicting the outcome of the breath test. RESULTS: The prevalence of a positive breath test was comparable in the two groups (337 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (66.9%) vs 240 patients with milk intolerance (71.4%)). The same holds true for the first peak of hydrogen excretion, total hydrogen output and prevalence of symptoms during, and in the four hours after, the test. The predominant presenting symptom was not useful for predicting outcome of the test either in regular milk users or in milk intolerant subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The almost identical results of the lactose breath test of patients with irritable bowel syndrome and subjects with self-reported milk intolerance suggests that the two conditions overlap to such an extent that the clinical approach should be the same. A lactose breath test should always be included in the diagnostic work-up for irritable bowel syndrome, as fermentation of malabsorbed lactose is likely responsible for triggering symptoms. Conversely, lactase deficiency is probably irrelevant in most subjects not affected by irritable bowel syndrome, within a moderate milk consumption.     

Mixing of the intestinal content and variations of fermentation capacity do not affect the results of hydrogen breath test

OBJECTIVE: Although the hydrogen (H(2)) breath test has been in use for many years for diagnosis of sugar malabsorption, research is still underway to improve its diagnostic accuracy. In this study, we investigated whether possible confusing factors caused by the ingestion of the test solution itself (such as the delivery to the colon of other fermentable substrates pre-existing in the small bowel lumen, the release of preformed H(2) trapped in the feces, or differences in the fermenting capacity of the colonic bacteria) may interfere with the increase of breath H(2) concentration, an expression of malabsorption of the test substrate. METHODS: In 25 patients with untreated celiac disease and 23 sex- and age-matched healthy volunteers, breath H(2) excretion was measured after ingestion of a 250-ml solution containing sorbitol, a poorly absorbed alcohol sugar. On 2 other separate days, 12 randomly selected subjects in each group underwent breath H(2) excretion measurement after ingestion of 250 ml of a sugar free, nonabsorbable electrolyte solution and 250 ml of a solution containing lactulose, a nonabsorbable disaccharide. RESULTS: After sorbitol ingestion, celiac disease patients showed a significantly higher breath H(2) excretion than did healthy volunteers. Otherwise, breath H(2) responses to electrolyte solution and lactulose showed no difference between the two groups of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In a group of patients with sugar malabsorption, increased breath H(2) excretion does reflect malabsorption. The washout or the mixing of the intestinal content or intergroup difference of fermenting activity of the colonic bacteria do not represent interfering factors and do not modify the accuracy of the H(2) breath test in day-to-day clinical practice.     

Breath hydrogen response to lactulose in healthy subjects: relationship to methane producing status.

In order to assess the relationship between methane (CH4) producing status and the breath excretion of hydrogen (H2) in healthy subjects, breath CH4 and H2 were simultaneously measured for 14 hours after oral ingestion of 10 g lactulose in 65 young volunteers. Forty were breath CH4 producers and 25 were not. Statistically significant differences were observed between both groups, with lower values for CH4 producers recorded for the following parameters: fasting basal value of breath H2 (8.1 (4.9) v 5.2 (3.7) ppm, p less than 0.05), mouth-to-caecum transit time (68 (24) v 111 (52) min, p less than 0.005), and breath H2 production measured as area under the curve 13.1 (6.9) v 8.8 (3.8) 10(3) ppm/min, p less than 0.02). There was no significant correlation between individual production of breath H2 and CH4. These results indicate that the response to lactulose depends on breath CH4 producing status. In clinical practice, defining normal values of mouth-to-caecum transit time without knowledge of breath CH4 producing status may lead to misinterpretation of the H2 breath test.     

Breath hydrogen test to evaluate lactose absorption and small bowel bacterial overgrowth in children

The aim of this study was to determine the lactose absorption capacity and possible existence of bacterial overgrowth in the small bowel in asymptomatic school children of low social economic level in Marilia, a city located in the interior of S?o Paulo state. Eighty three children aging 7 to 15 years old without any gastrointestinal manifestations at least 30 days prior to the tests were studied. All the patients had fasted for at least 8 hours before the tests were performed. Lactose absorption was evaluated by breath hidrogen test after an overload of lactose 18 g in 10% aquous solution. Lactose intolerance was determined by the occurrence of clinical symptoms, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, flatulence, etc in the following 24 hours after the test was performed. Bacterial overgrowth was evaluated by the breath hidrogen test after a 10 g lactulose load in aqueous solution. Lactose malabsorption was detected in 19 (22.9%) children and lactose intolerance was observed in 10 (12%) children. Lactose intolerance was more frequently observed in children who showed lactose malabsorption (6/19; 31.6%) than in those who presented a normal test (4/64; 6.3%) (P = 0.008). Bacterial overgrowth was detected in six (7.2%) children and showed no statistical relationship with lactose malabsorption. Ontogenetic lactose malabsorption verified in this group of school children is similar to the reported for Caucasian populations. Presence of bacterial overgrowth confirms the existence of asymptomatic environmental enteropathy in children of low social economic level.     

Lactose and calcium absorption in postmenopausal osteoporosis

The prevalence of lactase deficiency and the relationship between lactose and calcium malabsorption in postmenopausal osteoporosis has been assessed in 46 subjects. Malabsorption of lactose occurred in 25 (54%) of the subjects and was associated with a significantly lower milk intake. Malabsorption of calcium occurred in 11 (44%) of the lactase-deficient subjects and in 11 (52%) of normal lactose absorbers. There was no relationship between lactose and calcium malabsorption. Vertebral and forearm mineral densities were not significantly different between normal lactose absorbers and lactase-deficient subjects.     

Acidic colonic microclimate--possible reason for false negative hydrogen breath tests.

About 5% of normal subjects fail to produce increased hydrogen breath concentration after ingestion of the non-digestible carbohydrate lactulose (low hydrogen producers). The existence of low hydrogen producers limits the diagnostic use of hydrogen (H2) breath tests. We studied the effects of lactulose and of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) pretreatment on stool-pH and on hydrogen exhalation after oral loading with lactulose or lactose in 17 hydrogen producers and 12 low hydrogen producers. In seven hydrogen producers acidification of stool pH by lactulose pretreatment (20 g tid) decreased hydrogen exhalation and three of seven (43%) became low hydrogen producers. In contrast, after pretreatment of eight low hydrogen producers with magnesium sulphate (5 g twice daily) all eight produced hydrogen after a lactulose load. Similarly four lactose intolerant low hydrogen producers had abnormal lactose hydrogen breath tests after MgSO4 pretreatment. MgSO4 pretreatment neither resulted in false positive lactose hydrogen breath tests in five lactose tolerant hydrogen producers, nor increased the hydrogen exhalation in five additional hydrogen producing controls after ingestion of lactulose. The results of these studies confirm that hydrogen production from lactulose decreases when the colonic pH is lower (lactulose pretreatment), and increases when colonic pH is higher (MgSO4 pretreatment). In low hydrogen producers the lacking increase of H2 exhalation after ingestion of non-digestible carbohydrates can be overcome by MgSO4 pretreatment, thus increasing the sensitivity of the test by avoiding false negative hydrogen breath tests in low hydrogen producers with disaccharide malabsorption or maldigestion. The underlying mechanism of this remarkable effect of MgSO4 pretreatment warrants further investigation.     

Lactose malabsorption and intolerance: What should be the best clinical management?

Lactose malabsorption (LM) is the incomplete hydrolysis of lactose due to lactase deficiency, which may occur as a primary disorder or secondary to other intestinal diseases. Primary adult-type hypolactasia is an autosomal recessive condition resulting from the physiological decline of lactase activity. Different methods have been used to diagnose LM. Lactose breath test represents the most reliable technique. A recent consensus conference has proposed the more physiological dosage of 25 g of lactose and a standardized procedure for breath testing. Recently a new genetic test, based on C/T13910 polymorphism, has been proposed for the diagnosis of adult-type hypolactasia, complementing the role of breath testing. LM represents a wellknown cause of abdominal symptoms although only some lactose malabsorbers are also intolerants. Diagnosing lactose intolerance is not straightforward. Many non-malabsorber subjects diagnose themselves as being lactose intolerant. Blind lactose challenge studies should be recommended to obtain objective results. Besides several studies indicate that subjects with lactose intolerance can ingest up to 15 g of lactose with no or minor symptoms. Therefore a therapeutic strategy consists of a lactose restricted diet avoiding the nutritional disadvantages of reduced calcium and vitamin intake. Various pharmacological options are also available. Unfortunately there is insufficient evidence that these therapies are effective. Further double-blind studies are needed to demonstrate treatment effectiveness in lactose intolerance.     

Pilot study on the effect of reducing dietary FODMAP intake on bowel function in patients without a colon

BACKGROUND: Poorly absorbed short-chain carbohydrates (FODMAPs) in the diet should, by virtue of their osmotic effects, increase fecal output following colectomy and ileal pouch formation or ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). The aim was to perform a proof-of-concept evaluation of this hypothesis. METHODS: Fifteen patients (13 pouch, 2 IRA) had dietary and symptomatic evaluation before and during a low FODMAP diet. Carbohydrate malabsorption was evaluated by breath tests. Pouchitis was assessed clinically/endoscopically or by fecal lactoferrin. RESULTS: Of 8 patients with a breath hydrogen response to lactulose, 7 had fructose malabsorption, 3 with lactose malabsorption, and 1 had lactose malabsorption alone. Five of 7 studied retrospectively improved stool frequency (from median 8 to 4 per day; P = 0.02), this being sustained over 0.5-3 years of follow-up. Five of 8 patients completed a prospective arm of the study. One patient had sustained improvement in stool frequency and 1 had reduced wind production. Overall, none of 8 patients who had pouchitis improved. In contrast, median daily stool frequency fell from 8 to 4 (P = 0.001) in the 7 without pouchitis. The degree of change in FODMAP intake also predicted response. There was a tendency for pouchitis to be associated with low baseline FODMAP intake. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of carbohydrate malabsorption in these patients. Reduction of the intake of FODMAPs may be efficacious in reducing stool frequency in patients without pouchitis, depending on dietary adherence and baseline diet.     

Hydrogen breath test quantification and clinical correlation of lactose malabsorption in adult irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis

Lactose malabsorption was studied, by hydrogen breath test, in 72 adults suffering from irritable bowel syndrome, in 20 ulcerative colitis patients, and in 69 healthy subjects. The minimum dose of lactose required to cause a positive breath test was determined, and the symptoms caused and the resulting hydrogen eliminated quantified. A high incidence of lactose malabsorption was shown at standard doses (up to 50 g) in both the healthy subjects (70%) and the patients (86% and 85%, respectively). In the irritable bowel syndrome and the ulcerative colitis groups, symptoms occurred with a smaller quantity of breath hydrogen, presumably in association with a greater individual sensitivity of the colon to distension. The threshold lactose dose was notably lower in the diseased subjects who registered as evidence a prevalence of malabsorption at a 20-g lactose load. The pathogenetic role of lactose malabsorption in the irritable bowel syndrome is emphasized, as is the importance of the personal lactose tolerance.     

Lactose intolerance in adults with chronic unspecific abdominal complaints

77 hospitalized patients with chronic unspecific abdominal complaints, in whom any other organic disease had been previously excluded, were investigated for lactose malabsorption; they were subdivided into two groups: 46 patients complaining primarily of colicky abdominal pain and/or intermittent diarrhoea (group 1) and 31 patients presenting with dyspepsia as the predominant symptom (group 2). To establish the exact prevalence of isolated lactase deficiency in the healthy adult population served by our hospital, 40 Italian adult healthy subjects were also studied. The prevalence of lactose malabsorption was significantly higher (p less than 0.005) in patients of the 1st group than in patients of the 2nd group, and in the healthy adult population seen at our hospital (74% vs 35.5% and 37.5%, respectively). Furthermore a high prevalence of lactose intolerance, determined by means of a three-week diet trial (lactose free-diet versus normal diet), was documented among lactose malabsorbers of the 1st group. We concluded therefore that lactose intolerance is a factor in some Italian adult patients who suffer from long-standing aspecific abdominal discomfort, and it should be always considered in these patients, especially when colicky abdominal pain and diarrhoea are present, before the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome is made.     

Coincidental Malabsorption of Lactose, Fructose, and Sorbitol Ingested at Low Doses Is Not Common in Normal Adults

Normal subjects may incompletely absorb either lactose, fructose, or sorbitol and may therefore have abdominal symptoms. The frequency of coincidental malabsorption of these sugars is not known. This is clinically important, since we often ingest them during the same day and malabsorption may cause abdominal symptoms. To shed light on this issue we studied 32 normal subjects. Volunteers drank in random order the following solutions: 20 g lactulose, 50 g sucrose, 50 and 25 g lactose, 50 and 25 g fructose, 20 and 10 g sorbitol. Semiquantitative carbohydrate malabsorption was estimated with lactulose standards. Frequency of 50-g lactose (69%), 50-g fructose (81%), and 20-g sorbitol (84%) malabsorption was not significantly different (P = 0.3). The estimated median fraction of the ingested high dose malabsorbed was 42, 19, and 68% for lactose, fructose, and sorbitol, respectively. At low challenging doses, 63% of the volunteers absorbed two of three or all three sugars, and 88% were asymptomatic to two or all three sugars. In conclusion, the frequency of coincidental malabsorption of lactose, fructose, and sorbitol and intolerance to these sugars is not common, when normal adults ingest them at low doses.     

Lactose malabsorption in Greek adults: correlation of small bowel transit time with the severity of lactose intolerance.

Using breath hydrogen analysis after 139 mmol (50 g) oral lactose load, we investigated the prevalence of lactose malabsorption in 200 Greek adults and examined the relationship between symptoms and small bowel transit time. One hundred and fifty subjects had increased breath hydrogen concentrations (greater than 20 ppm) after the lactose load. In these individuals peak breath hydrogen concentration was inversely related to small bowel transit time (r = 0.63, 6 = 6.854, p less than 0.001) and the severity of symptoms decreased with increasing small bowel transit time. Lactose malabsorbers with diarrhoea during the lactose tolerance test had a small bowel transit time of 51 +/- 22 minutes (x +/- SD; n = 90) which was significantly shorter than the small bowel transit time of patients with colicky pain, flatulence, and abdominal distension (74 +/- 30, n = 53; p less than 0.001) and both groups had significantly shorter small bowel transit time than that of asymptomatic malabsorbers (115 +/- 21 n:7; p less than 0.001). When the oral lactose load was reduced to 33 mmol (12 g), the small bowel transit time increased five-fold and the overall incidence of diarrhoea and/or symptoms decreased dramatically. These results indicate that the prevalence of lactase deficiency in Greece may be as high as 75% and suggest that symptom production in lactose malabsorbers is brought about by the rapid passage down the small intestine of the malabsorbed lactose.