Blood concentrations of futraful, uracil and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) after UFT administration in the various reconstructions after gastrectomy. Saitama UFT Research Group]

The study was undertaken in the total of 58 gastric cancer patients among which 17 of Billroth (BI), 14 of Billroth II (B II) anastomosis after subtotal gastrectomy, and 7 of jejunal interposition, 9 of double tract and 11 of Roux en Y anastomosis after total gastrectomy were included. Blood samples were taken before 200 mg of per oral UFT administration and after 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7hrs. consecutively. The blood Futraful (FT) level in the total gastrectomy groups reached peak concentration within 1hr and kept in relatively high level during the observation period of 7hrs. The time to maximum FT concentration delayed in almost of B I and a few of B II patients. The concentration curves of uracil (URA) and 5-FU were similar in shape, revealing steep increase and decrease except B I anastomosis which showed gentle course. The plotted maximum concentrations of URA and 5-FU in the every type of reconstruction showed a significant correlation in the regression line. In the analysis of AUC, URA/FT was under 10%, suggesting the longer retention of the unmetabolite type of FT and early disappearance of URA. The ratio of 5-FU/FT was indifferent in each reconstruction. 5-FU/URA was higher in subtotal rather than total gastrectomy groups. From the data obtained, blood concentration of 5-FU after UFT administration was considered to depend on the emptying status in the gastrectomies. And moreover, it depended on blood URA level, since FT from which 5-FU was derived, was kept still sufficiently remained during observation period.     

5-FU, FT-207 and uracil concentrations in the serum and tissues of patients with cervical cancer after UFT oral administration

The concentrations of 5-FU, FT-207 and uracil were estimated in blood serum, cancer tissue and normal tissue of patients with uterine cervical cancer. A daily dose of 600 mg of UFT was administrated for 7 days to cervical cancer patients, and they received radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. After single administration of UFT, the serum concentration of 5-FU was highest at 60 minutes (0.094 micrograms/ml) and became reduced with time. On the other hand, when UFT was administered for 7 consecutive days, the serum concentration of 5-FU was found to reach a plateau between 60 minutes (0.215 micrograms/ml) and 120 minutes (0.222 micrograms/ml) with gradual decline thereafter. Significantly higher levels of 5-FU were achieved at 60 min. and 120 min. and apparent accumulation of 5-FU in serum was observed following continuous administration of UFT. Similar results were observed regarding the change of serum concentration of uracil, while FT-207 was observed to remain in serum for a longer time than 5-FU. In the uterine cervix, the concentration of 5-FU cancer tissue was 0.087 micrograms/ml, approximately 3 times that of normal tissue, and approximately 5.1 times that of the preoperative serum concentration of 5-FU, indicating a tendency to accumulate in cancer tissue. Although a higher concentration of 5-FU was detected in pelvic lymph nodes and ovaries, no significant differences were recognized between metastatic nodes and metastasis-free nodes.     

5-FU pharmacokinetic study of 5-FU hepato-arterial infusion with oral UFT

5-FU hepato-arterial infusion (HAI) is powerful chemotherapy for liver metastases of colorectal cancers. Event though hepatic lesions are controlled by 5-FU HAI, we have found that extra-hepatic lesions are the limiting factor for colorectal cancer patients. General chemotherapy is necessary in addition to 5-FU HAI. The chemotherapy of 5-FU venous infusion plus oral UFT is called "pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy (PMC)." This protocol is very effective for colorectal cancers, because UFT reduces the rate of metabolism of infused 5-FU. We studied the plasma 5-FU concentration at the time of weekly high dose 5-FU HAI plus oral UFT. The plasma concentration of 5-FU in 5-FU HAI plus UFT is 1.5-6 times as high as with 5-FU HAI only. 5-FU concentration in the liver tissue is likely to be much higher at the time of 5-FU HAI. 5-FU HAI plus oral UFT can be more effective for not only liver metastases but also for extra-hepatic lesions than 5-FU HAI alone.     

5-FU concentration in tumor tissue and the antitumor effect in patients with gastric cancer after oral administration of UFT

Serum and tumor tissue concentration of FT, 5-FU and uracil were measured in 23 patients with gastric cancer who were administered UFT preoperatively. The degeneration of cancer cells was evaluated histologically and the correlation between 5-FU concentration in the tumor tissue and the antitumor effect was assessed. The average concentration of 5-FU in tumor tissue (0.122 microgram/g) was significantly higher than that in normal gastric tissues. Serum 5-FU concentration was very low, suggesting no accumulation of 5-FU in blood. A positive correlation between the concentration of 5-FU and uracil in tumor tissues was found. A 5-FU level higher than 0.05 microgram/g was frequently demonstrated in tumor tissue, resulting in moderate degeneration of cancer cells in many cases. When tumors were classified according to histological type, intratumoral 5-FU concentration was not always correlated with degeneration of cancer cells. The above results suggested that UFT was a very effective drug for stomach cancer because of high tumor affinity for 5-FU, but that it is necessary to consider the sensitivity of tumor cells to antitumor drugs in order to obtain an excellent antitumor effect.     

Study on the concentrations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), tegafur (ET) and uracil in bile: comparison of UFT or FT

The serum and bile tegafur (FT), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and uracil levels after administration of UFT were assessed in 13 cases of malignant biliary tumor accompanied by biliary obstruction in comparison with FT alone. The serum and bile FT and 5-FU levels showed almost the same transition pattern in both groups, reaching to the plateau in 1-2 weeks and revealing cumulative effect by continual administration. Correlation was obtained between serum and bile levels except for 5-FU level in UFT group (p less than 0.05). Correlation between 5-FU and uracil was obtained in the serum in both groups (p less than 0.05), but no effect of uracil was observed. In bile, correlation was seen only in UFT group (p less than 0.05), and the effect of uracil was observed in bile 5-FU level.     

5-FU concentration in blood and tissue of patients with renal cell carcinoma after administration of UFT

UFT (3 capsules; 300mg FT) was administered to five of 10 patients with renal cell carcinoma, and concentrations of FT, 5-FU and uracil in the serum and tissues (normal renal tissues, renal tumor tissues and liver) were determined 5.2 hours on average, after administration. The levels were also compared with these in the five patients administered 300 mg of FT. There was no difference in FT concentration between the serum and the tissues in the group administered UFT, but the concentration of 5-FU in tumor tissues was significantly higher (25.6 times) than that in the serum. The level was also higher (3.2 times) than that in normal renal tissues. There was a positive correlation between the concentration of 5-FU in the tissues and the concentration of uracil in the tissues. Although there was no difference in the concentration of FT between serum and tissues in patients administered UFT or FT, the concentration of 5-FU in patients administered UFT was definitely higher than that in patients administered FT; the concentration of 5-FU in the tumor tissues of patients given UFT was 3.9 times higher than in those given FT. Thus, UFT induced a concentration of 5-FU in tumor tissues that was maintained at a high level, suggesting that an excellent antitumor effect on renal cell carcinoma can be expected with UFT.     

Evaluations of biomarkers associated with 5-FU sensitivity for non-small-cell lung cancer patients postoperatively treated with UFT

The sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been reported to be associated with target molecule thymidylate synthase (TS), fluoropyrimidine-metabolising enzymes such as orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). We performed an immunohistochemical study on the clinical significance of TS, OPRT, and DPD expression using 151 resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients postoperatively treated with a combination of tegafur and uracil (UFT). Eighty-two carcinomas were TS-positive, 105 carcinomas were OPRT-positive, 68 carcinomas were DPD-positive. No correlation was observed in the HSCORE between the TS and OPRT expression (r=0.203), between the TS and DPD expression (r=0.098), or between the OPRT and DPD expression (r=0.074). Regarding the survival of NSCLC patients treated with UFT, the 5-year survival rate of patients with TS-negative tumours was significantly higher than that with TS-positive tumours (P=0.0133). The 5-year survival rate of patients with OPRT-positive stage II to III tumours was significantly higher than that with OPRT-negative stage II to III tumours (P=0.0145). In addition, the 5-year survival rate of patients with DPD-negative tumours was also significantly higher than that with DPD-positive tumours (P=0.0004). A Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed the TS status (hazard ratio 2.663; P=0.0003), OPRT status (hazard ratio 2.543; P=0.0005), and DPD status (hazard ratio 2.840; P<0.0001) to all be significant prognostic factors for the survival of resected NSCLC patients postoperatively treated with UFT.     

Comparison of pharmacokinetics of 5-FU and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine, a metabolite of 5-FU, in plasma after administration of UFT, tegafur, 5-FU or doxifluridine to rats

Toxic effects (neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity) of 5-FU and its derivatives have been reported by many investigators. These toxicities are considered to be caused by the inhibition of the TCA cycle by alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL), a metabolite of 5-FU, and later metabolites. In this study, we focused on FBAL as an index of the above toxicities. We compared the concentrations of 5-FU and FBAL in plasma after administration of UFT, tegafur (FT), 5-FU or doxifluridine (5'-DFUR) to rats (75 mumol/kg) in order to evaluate which compound has the better balance of efficacy and toxicity. UFT exhibited the lowest FBAL concentration in plasma followed by FT, 5'-DFUR and 5-FU. The ratio of FBAL to 5-FU in Cmax and AUC after dosing of UFT was the lowest among these four test compounds. These data indicate that the lowest ratio of FBAL to 5-FU resulted from the inhibitory effect of uracil, a component of UFT, on the metabolism of 5-FU. In conclusion, the present results suggest that UFT has a better balance of efficacy and toxicity than FT, 5-FU and 5'-DFUR.     

Comparative clinical study on 5-FU concentrations for oral HCFU and i.v. 5-FU

Using the cross-over method, the same patients were administered continuous intravenous injections of 5-FU and HCFU, an oral derivative of 5-FU widely used for breast and colon cancer in Japan. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU in blood of both drugs were then compared. The AUC of the 5-FU concentration in blood of the HCFU 100 mg group tended to be higher than that in the 5-FU 250 mg group and lower than that in the 5-FU 500 mg group. There was, however, no statistically significant difference between the HCFU and 5-FU 250 mg groups (p = 0.3274), or between the HCFU and 5-FU 500 mg groups (p = 0.1921).     

5-Fluorouracil, tegafur, and uracil concentrations in serum and tissue of the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after UFT administration

UFT is a preparation consisting of tegafur and uracil at the molar ratio 1 : 4. In 22 resected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the concentrations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), tegafur and uracil were estimated in the serum, liver and cancer tissues after oral administration of UFT (tegafur, 300mg) before operation. The concentrations of 5-FU, tegafur and uracil in the serum were highest at 2 hours, and reduced thereafter. The maximum 5-FU level was 0.040 +/- 0.034 microgram/ml. The concentrations of 5-FU in the cancer tissue were 0.101 +/- 0.070 microgram/g in all patients, 0.085 +/- 0.050 microgram/g in cirrhotic patients and 0.144 +/- 0.105 microgram/g in non-cirrhotic patients. These concentrations were significantly higher than those in the liver tissue. In 10 out of 13 patients, 5-FU concentrations was higher than 0.056 microgram/g which was reported as minimum effective concentration. Conclusion: the concentration of 5-FU after oral administration of UFT prior to resection of HCC was estimated in the serum, liver and cancer tissues. The concentration of 5-FU in cancer tissues was satisfactorily higher regardless of cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic conditions UFT seemed to be a safe and useful drug since tissue 5-FU concentration was higher than those in the serum and liver.     

Level of 5-FU in uterine cervical cancer tissue after oral administration of UFT

We measured concentrations of 5-FU in cancerous and normal cervical tissues in 16 patients with cervical cancer to whom UFT or tegafur had been administered. The results were as follows: Concentrations of 5-FU in cancerous tissues measured 30 minutes and 2 hours after UFT administration were 0.181 +/- 0.034 microgram/g and 0.562 +/- 0.145 micrograms/g respectively, while in patients to whom tegafur had been administered, they were 0.105 +/- 0.030 microgram/g and 0.126 +/- 0.015 microgram/g respectively. The comparison of 5-FU concentrations in cancerous tissues within each individual patient indicated that the value was higher after UFT administration than after tegafur administration in 13 cases (81.3%). When classified by histological typing, cases of non-keratinizing carcinoma showed the highest value, followed by keratinizing cases and adenocarcinomas, which indicated the lowest value with administration of UFT. However, there were no differences among these three types when tegafur was administered. Based on the above findings, it was indicated that UFT is an antitumor agent with a higher tumor specificity, especially in non-keratinizing carcinoma.     

Antitumor effect of UFT on human ovarian cancer grafted to nude mice and 5-FU concentration in tumor and normal tissues

Antitumor effects of UFT, tegafur (FT-207), cisplatin (CDDP) and the combination of UFT with CDDP on a human ovarian cancer xenograft in nude mice and the concentration of 5-FU in the tumor tissue and major organs were studied. UFT (48.6mg/kg/day X 20) or tegafur (15.0mg/kg/day X 20) was daily administrated orally, and CDDP (5mg/kg/day X 3) was administrated intraperitoneally at an 7-day interval. The inhibition rates of the tumor growths were 49.6% with UFT, -2.3% with tegafur and 17.7% with CDDP, respectively. In the combination of UFT with CDDP, severe side effect were observed. The concentration of 5-FU in UFT-treated group was higher than tegafur group: about 2 times in the tumor, 5 times in the liver, 9 times in the kidney and 4 times in the spleen, respectively. In the combination of UFT with CDDP, the concentration of 5-FU in major organs, especially in the kidney, in nude mice that died at 10 day after drug administration were higher than in those of UFT. These findings indicate that UFT increases the intratumoral concentration of 5-FU to elicit better antitumor effect and also the concentration of 5-FU in various normal organs after long time administration.     

A case of recurrent sigmoid colon cancer successfully treated with 5-FU and UFT

A 57-year-old female patient with recurrent sigmoid colon cancer was successfully treated with 5-FU and UFT for 8 years. The patient, with cancer recurrence in the para-aortic lymph nodes, which were palpated in the abdomen, was given oral 5-FU at a daily dose of 200 mg. During the second week of administration, the mass showed a remarkable decrease in size, and complete disappearance was achieved within one month. However, 5 years and 2 months after discontinuation of 5-FU administration, recurrence in the supra-clavicular lymph nodes and para-aortic lymph nodes was recognized. After administration of UFT at a daily dose of 600 mg, complete disappearance of para-aortic lymph node recurrence was observed. At present, the patient is under observation as an outpatient at our hospital. This case suggests the effectiveness of 5-FU and UFT for lymph node metastases of sigmoid colon cancer.     

The management of gastric adenocarcinoma with postoperative chemoirradiation. A non-randomized comparison of oral UFT and 5-FU

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: We assessed the therapeutic results and tolerability of postoperative chemoradiotherapy with either oral UFT or 5-fluorouracil for carcinoma of the stomach. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Forty-six patients treated with chemoradiotherapy following total or subtotal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma formed the cohort evaluated. The group included 39 males and 7 females whose ages ranged from 21 to 74 years (median, 53 years). In all patients, surgical therapy was the initial approach with a curative intent. The types of operations performed were total gastrectomy in 11 or subtotal gastrectomy in 35 patients. Radiotherapy began from 14 to 161 days after surgery (median, 55 days). Twenty patients received concomitant oral UFT (200 mg/m2), and 26 patients were given 5-fluorouracil (425 mg/m2, iv bolus) concurrently with irradiation consisting of one or two cycles, usually as a 3-day bolus at the start and last 3 days of irradiation therapy for radiosensitizing purposes. The patients were treated using either cobalt-60 or 6 MV photons, and irradiation doses delivered to the tumor bed and regional lymphatics ranged from 40 to 50 Gy (median, 46 Gy). RESULTS: Median follow-up for the entire group was 24 months (range, 2-67). The 2-year overall survival of the entire group of patients was 64%. The 2-year overall survival rates for 5-fluorouracil and oral UFT groups were 72% and 66%, respectively (P = 0.3). Treatment-related factors were reviewed to identify any impact on survival. Analyses included type of surgery and dissection, fraction size, the total dose of irradiation and the type of chemotherapy. A significant detrimental effect in survival in the patients treated with D2 dissection compared to the patients treated with D1 dissection was noted (P = 0.01). Overall grade II-III toxicity of oral UFT was significantly lower than 5-FU (4 patients vs 14 patients, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of oral UFT with radiation seems to be more tolerable and an equally effective regimen in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer compared with 5-fluorouracil. D2 dissection was found to have detrimental effects on survival in this cohort.     

5-FU and HCFU concentrations in serum and tissues in hepatocellular carcinoma after HCFU oral administration

Before proceeding with a resection of a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients, the concentrations of 5-FU and 1-Hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU) have been measured in the serum, the liver, and in the cancer tissue after an oral administration of HCFU (300 mg). The maximum 5-FU value was found to be 3.45 +/- 3.21 micrograms/ml (n = 22) at 2 hours, and this value decreased linearly. The concentrations of 5-FU in the liver tissues were 0.02 +/- 0.01 micrograms/g (n = 16) and the concentrations of 5-FU in cancer tissues were 0.03 +/- 0.01 micrograms/g (n = 16). There were no statistical differences found between cirrhotic patients and non-cirrhotic patients. These results indicate that the concentrations of HCFU in the serum and tissues were not influenced by liver damage.     

FT, 5-FU and uracil concentrations of the blood, bile and tissue of hepatoma with liver cirrhosis after oral administration of UFT

UFT was orally administered to eight patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) combined with liver cirrhosis and to five patients with normal liver. The concentrations of FT-207 (FT), 5-FU, and uracil in blood, tissue and bile were then respectively determined. The FT level in cancer tissue and non-cancer tissue was almost identical in patients with HCC. On the other hand, the 5-FU level in normal liver tissue was significantly higher (P less than 0.05) than that in cancer tissue, and the uracil level in normal liver tissue was lower than that in cancer tissue (P less than 0.05). Transportation of FT from blood to liver was significantly correlated with clearance of indocyanine green from the blood (ICGK). These results suggested that transportation of FT from blood to liver and activation of FT were impaired in HCC with liver cirrhosis. However, the 5-FU level in the cancer tissue of HCC tended to be higher than that in non-cancer tissue. The 5-FU level in the tissue had a significant correlation with the FT level in the tissue. In addition, it was presumed that cancer tissue was able to produce 5-FU from FT more quickly than non-cancer tissue.     

5-FU concentration in the serum and the tumor tissue after administration of UFT 200 mg/day to patients over 80 years of age with oral cancer

UFT was administered orally at a dosage of 200 mg/day, 2 times a day, to patients over 80 years of age with oral cancer. The concentration of 5-FU in the serum and tumor tissue, as well as the side effects, were investigated. The results were as follows: 1. The concentration of 5-FU in the serum peaked (0.017 to 0.066 microgram/ml) 1 or 2 hours after UFT administration. The concentration 8 hours after administration was relatively high (0.016 to 0.041 microgram/ml). 2. The 5-FU concentrations in the tumor tissues in 3 out of 5 cases were greater than 0.05 microgram/g, which is considered to be the effective level. The concentration tended to be higher with increased duration of administration. 3. A minor side effect, bone marrow dysfunction, was observed. No effect on the function of the liver or digestive system was observed.     

5-FU concentration in the blood and tissue of patients with gastric and colorectal cancer after administration of UFT or tegafur

UFT or tegafur (5, 7.5 and 15 mg/kg, respectively) were given to Donryu rats with AH-130 cancer twice a day for 3 days, and 5-FU concentrations in the blood, tumor, normal stomach and large bowel tissues were measured by chemical assay and compared. The 5-FU concentrations in the tumor were higher than those of normal tissues and still remained 12 hours after the final dosage. According to increased UFT dosage, there were significantly higher levels of 5-FU concentration in tumor tissues but blood levels of 5-FU were low. The peak of concentration occurred at one to two hours after the final dosage. However, increase in tegafur dosage volume did not correlate with 5-FU levels. Clinical cases (74 patients) of gastric and colorectal cancer were orally administered UFT or tegafur at 300 mg twice a day for 3 days preoperatively. Materials were obtained at surgery at 5.5 hours on average after the final dosage and 5-FU levels in tissues were measured by chemical assay. Concentrations of 5-FU in cancerous tissues after UFT administration were 0.177 +/- 0.131 micrograms/g in gastric cancer and 0.130 +/- 0.051 micrograms/g in colorectal cancer, while in patients to whom tegafur had been administered, the concentrations were 0.194 +/- 0.124 micrograms/g and 0.119 +/- 0.075 micrograms/g, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-FU levels between the UFT-administered group and the tegafur group.     

Effects of combination chemotherapy with topical application of 5-FU ointment to mice's tongue and UFT

After oral administration of UFT and lingual topical application of 5-FU ointment to normal mice, the change of the concentration of 5-FU and Uracil in the tongue, liver and blood serum were studied. We compared with UFT only group, 5-FU ointment only group and the both combination chemotherapy group. 1. As for the tongue concentrations, 5-FU levels in both combination chemotherapy group and 5-FU ointment only group were higher compared to UFT only group. There was no difference between combination chemotherapy and 5-FU ointment only group. Uracil at 21-days in combination chemotherapy group were higher than others. 2. The liver concentrations of 5-FU at 21-days was significantly higher. 3. The blood serum concentrations of 5-FU in both combination chemotherapy and 5-FU ointment only groups revealed similar results. Thereafter, combination chemotherapy in oral region with topical application of 5-FU ointment and UFT may be effective.