The use of self‐expanding metallic stents (SEMS) is effective in symptom palliation from recurrent tumor after esophagogastrectomy for cancer

The efficacy of using self‐expanding metallic stent (SEMS) for palliation of symptoms because of tumor recurrence after prior esophagogastrectomy has not been properly assessed despite the well recognized use of SEMS in patients without prior surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using SEMS in patients who had prior esophagogastrectomy. The study group included 35 patients with carcinoma of esophagus or cardia documented to have loco‐regional recurrence after esophagogastrectomy and in whom SEMS were placed for palliation. The median age was 67 (ranged 41–85). The indications for stenting were dysphagia caused by recurrence at the esophageal anastomosis (n= 4) and in the esophageal remnant (n= 5), or extrinsic compression from mediastinal nodal disease (n= 7); gastric outlet obstruction produced by extrinsic tumor compression (n= 13); and tracheo‐esophageal fistulae (n= 6). Forty‐three stenting procedures were performed, and the technical success rate was 97.6%. The dysphagia score improved from 4.66 to 2.54 (P < 0.001). All patients with tracheo‐esophageal fistula had their symptoms successfully palliated. The immediate complication rate was 14% (n= 5); two patients had stent malpositioning, two had inadequate opening of their stents, and one had a failed stenting procedure. On follow‐up, 15 (42.8%) patients required a total of 22 re‐intervention procedures for various reasons: endoscopic dilatation (five dilatations in three patients), removal of foreign bodies (nine procedures in four patients), and insertion of a second SEMS related to tumor growth (eight stents in eight patients). There was no procedure‐related mortality. The median survival was short at 42 days (range 5–290 days), mostly related to advanced disease stage. SEMS in patients with recurrent tumor after esophagogastrectomy is safe and effective.     

Management of post-gastrectomy anastomosis site obstruction with a self-expandable metallic stent

Post-gastrectomy anastomosis site obstruction is a relatively rare complication after a subtotal gastrectomy.We present a case of a 75-year-old man who underwent a truncal vagotomy, omental patch, gastrojejunostomy, and Braun anastomosis for duodenal ulcer perforation and a gastric outlet obstruction.Following the 10 th postoperative day, the patient complained of abdominal discomfort and vomiting.We diagnosed post-gastrectomy anastomosis site obstruction by an upper gastrointestinal series and an upper endoscopic examination.We inserted a self-expandable metallic stent(SEMS) at the anastomosis site.The stent was fully expanded after deployment.On the day following the stent insertion, the patient began to eat, and his abdominal discomfort was resolved.This paper describes the successful management of post-gastrectomy anastomosis site obstruction with temporary placement of a SEMS.     

Vascular pedicled jejunal Roux-en-Y reconstruction with supercharge technique for necrosis of the gastric tube following subtotal esophagectomy

Necrosis of the esophageal conduit is a life-threatening complication in esophageal cancer surgery, and secondary reconstruction options for esophageal discontinuity are quite limited. We present a procedure in which we used a long-segment jejunal flap with a supercharged vascular pedicle to treat gastric tube necrosis following subtotal esophagectomy in a 64-year-old man with esophageal cancer. The proximal jejunal flap was pulled up in Roux-en-Y fashion through the subcutaneous route together with the vascular pedicle of the fourth branch of the jejunal vessels, and the cut edges of the second jejunal vessel were anastomosed microscopically to the internal thoracic vessels for supercharging. No problems occurred with either vessel or digestive tract anastomosis. The patient was able to commence oral intake on postoperative day (POD) 10, was discharged on POD 37, and obtained a good quality of life at home. This result suggests that supercharged vascular pedicled jejunum is a suitable alternative conduit for secondary reconstruction following necrosis of the esophageal conduit in esophageal cancer surgery.     

Temporary endosonography-guided biliary drainage for transgastrointestinal deployment of a self-expandable metallic stent

Endosonography-guided biliary drainage (ESBD) is now gaining acceptance as a useful alternative for the management of obstructive jaundice.(1) At present, ESBD is used mainly to establish an anastomosis between the biliary tree and the duodenum, stomach, jejunum, or esophagus by placing a stent so as to bridge the bile duct and alimentary tract. We herein report a new application of ESBD, that is, its temporary use for gaining access to the bile duct in order to deploy a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) via the transhepatic route. In a patient with pylorus stenosis due to advanced gastric cancer with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction caused by nodal metastasis, a plastic stent was placed temporarily by ESBD to bridge the esophagus and the left hepatic duct. Ten days later, the stent was retrieved, leaving a guidewire in the bile duct, and a delivery unit of a SEMS was introduced into the bile duct over the guidewire via the sinus tract. The SEMS was then successfully deployed through the stenosis. No stent was left in the sinus tract. This procedure yields a mature fistula through which a delivery unit can be safely introduced into the bile duct followed by uneventful deployment of a SEMS.     

Surgical repair of refractory strictures of esophagogastric anastomoses caused by leakage following esophagectomy

Refractory strictures of esophagogastric anastomosis caused by leakage following an esophagectomy are a severe complication, for which either repeated balloon dilations or bougies are not necessarily effective. In such a case, surgical repair is quite difficult because the esophageal substitute such as the stomach or colon is usually located in the mediastinum and severely adhesive to the neighboring organs. Furthermore, in case the resected stricture is too long for direct re‐anastomosis to be performed, a free jejunal graft or a new esophageal substitute should be prepared. This paper proposes a procedure for the re‐reconstruction of refractory stricture in the case of a retrosternal reconstruction with a gastric conduit, which frequently employs pull‐up route. The anterior plate of the manubrium was divided medially from the notch to the symphysis with the sternal saw. The manubrium is then removed, bite by bite, like breaking up rocks, with a bone rongeur forceps, starting with the anterior plate, then the posterior plate, from upper median part to the lower and lateral part of the sternum until it reaches the symphysis and the sternoclavicular and the sternocostal joints. It is safer to destroy the manubrium little by little from the anterior side so that the posterior periosteum, which is likely to adhere tightly to the gastric conduit, can be preserved. After the manubrium is almost completely resected and the posterior periosteum of the manubrium is preserved, a median longitudinal incision is carefully made on the periosteum so as not to damage the gastric conduit that may be adhesive to the periosteum. The periosteum was gradually opened bilaterally separating the periostium and the gastric conduit. Although gastroenterological surgeons may hesitate to remove the manubrium, removing the manubrium and preserving the posterior periosteum make it possible to avoid injuring the gastric conduit and to provide a wide view around the stenosis for safely resecting the anastomotic stricture. Furthermore, this procedure allows direct re‐anastomosis between the cervical esophagus and the gastric conduit without a complicated reconstruction such as a free jejunal graft. This procedure is strongly recommended as an alternative option so that a second reconstruction can be performed both safely and steadily.     

Metallic stent deployment in endosonography‐guided biliary drainage: Long‐term follow‐up results in patients with bilio‐enteric anastomosis

Background and Aim: Although reports on endosonography‐guided biliary drainage (ESBD) have been increasing, only a few reports on deployment of a self‐expandable metal stents (SEMS) have been reported. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SEMS deployment in ESBD. Methods: Of 42 patients who underwent ESBD during the period from January 2007 to August 2011, 21 patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction in whom SEMS deployment had been attempted were included. In the first session, a plastic stent or SEMS was placed in a bilio‐enteric anastomosis (BEA) method. SEMS was deployed with the one‐step technique or with replacement of a plastic stent with a SEMS in the second session. The technical success, early and late complications, and stent patency of SEMS were evaluated. Results: One‐step SEMS deployment was attempted in seven patients, and SEMS was deployed with stent exchange in 14. SEMS deployment was successful in all patients without any complications. Finally, SEMS was placed in a BEA method in 16 patients (extrahepatic bile duct, 13; intrahepatic bile duct, three), and with antegrade deployment in five. Late complications occurred in three patients who underwent deployment of SEMS in a BEA method (stent obstruction in two and reflux cholangitis in one). The mean stent patency period was 433 days. Conclusions: As SEMS deployment in ESBD is safe and provides long stent patency, a SEMS seems to be the stent of choice in ESBD for patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction in whom long survival is expected.     

Fracture of a Self-expandable Metallic Stent Inserted for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Duodenal stenting has gradually been established as the first-line treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). We encountered a case of duodenal stent fracture in a 76-year-old woman with gastric cancer and GOO. She underwent self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement. The SEMS was found to be fractured 4 weeks after its placement. We removed the broken part of the stent and placed a second SEMS. SEMS fracture is a rare and - to the best of our knowledge - unreported complication; hence, clinicians and their patients should be aware of this possibility.     

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: a focus on current diagnostic and surgical concepts

Complete surgical resection still remains the only possibility of curing pancreatic cancer, however, only 10% of patients undergo curative surgery. Pancreatic resection currently remains the only method of curing patients, and has a 5-year overall survival rate between 7%-34% compared to a median survival of 3-11 mo for unresected cancer. Pancreatic surgery is a technically demanding procedure requiring highly standardized surgical techniques. Nevertheless, even in experienced hands, perioperative morbidity rates (delayed gastric emptying, pancreatic fistula etc.) are as high as 50%. Different strategies to reduce postoperative morbidity, such as different techniques of gastroenteric reconstruction (pancreatico-jejunostomy vs pancreatico-gastrostomy), intraoperative placement of a pancreatic main duct stent or temporary sealing of the main pancreatic duct with fibrin glue have not led to a significant improvement in clinical outcome. The perioperative application of somatostatin or its analogues may decrease the incidence of pancreatic fistulas in cases with soft pancreatic tissue and a small main pancreatic duct (< 3 mm). The positive effects of external pancreatic main duct drainage and antecolic gastrointestinal reconstruction have been observed to decrease the rate of pancreatic fistulas and delayed gastric emptying, respectively. Currently, the concept of extended radical lymphadenectomy has been found to be associated with higher perioperative morbidity, but without any positive impact on overall survival. However, there is growing evidence that portal vein resections can be performed with acceptable low perioperative morbidity and mortality but does not achieve a cure.     

Clinical outcomes of self-expandable metal stents in palliation of malignant anastomotic strictures caused by recurrent gastric cancer

AIM： To examine the technical feasibility and clinical outcomes of the endoscopic insertion of a selfexpandable metal stent （SEMS） for the palliation of a malignant anastomotic stricture caused by recurrent gastric cancer. METHODS： The medical records of patients, who had obstructive symptoms caused by a malignant anastomotic stricture after gastric surgery and underwent endoscopic insertion of a SEMS from January 2001 to December 2007 at Kangnam St Mary＇s Hospital, were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS： Twenty patients （15 male, mean age 63 years） were included. The operations were a total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy （n = 12）, subtotal gastrectomy with Billroth-Ⅰ reconstruction （n = 2） and subtotal gastrectomy with Billroth- Ⅱ reconstruction （n = 8）. The technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 70%, respectively. A small bowel or colon stricture was the reason for a lack of improvement in symptoms in 4 patients. Two of these patients showed improvement in symptoms after another stent was placed. Stent reobstruction caused by tumor ingrowth or overgrowth occurred in 3 patients （15%） within 1 mo after stenting. Stent migration occurred with a covered stent in 3 patients who underwent a subtotal gastrectomy with Billroth-Ⅱ reconstruction. Two cases of partial stent migration were easily treated with a second stent or stent repositioning. The median stent patency was 56 d （range, 5-439 d）. The median survival was 83 d （range, 12-439 d）. CONCLUSION： Endoscopic insertion of a SEMS provides safe and effective palliation of a recurrent anastomotic stricture caused by gastric cancer, A meticulous evaluation of the presence of other strictures before inserting the stent is essential for symptom improvement.     

Endoscopic stenting in patients with recurrent malignant obstruction after gastric surgery: uncovered versus simultaneously deployed uncovered and covered (double) self-expandable metal stents

BACKGROUND: Uncovered, rather than covered, metal stents are commonly used for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction because of the low risk of stent migration, but tumor ingrowth risk is a major drawback. Few reports address malignant obstruction after gastric surgery. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the technical feasibility and clinical outcome of using an endoscopic uncovered self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) and simultaneous use of uncovered and covered SEMS (double SEMS) in patients with recurrent malignant obstruction after gastric surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care, academic medical center, from August 2000 to June 2005. PATIENTS: Twenty patients were included in the study. All patients had symptomatic obstruction with nausea, vomiting, and decreased oral intake. INTERVENTION: Ten patients received uncovered SEMS; the other 10 received double SEMS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: To compare tumor ingrowth and stent patency between the uncovered and the double-SEMS groups. RESULTS: Technical and clinical successes were 10 of 10 and 8 of 10, respectively, in the uncovered SEMS group and 10 of 10 and 10 of 10, respectively, in the double SEMS group. Six of 10 patients (60%) with uncovered SEMS had tumor ingrowth compared with 1 of 10 patients with double SEMS, P = .057. Five of 10 patients (50%) with uncovered SEMS had very early restenosis, but no patients had early restenosis in the double SEMS group, P = .033. Stent patency was a median of 21.5 days (range, 7-217 days) in the uncovered SEMS group and 150 days (range 29-263 days) in the double SEMS group, P = .037. Survival duration was 109.5 days (range 29-280 days) and 150 days (range 29-263 days), respectively. LIMITATIONS: This was a small retrospective study. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous double stent placement seems to be technically feasible and effective for palliative treatment of recurrent malignant obstruction after gastric surgery. Double stent placement is important in preventing tumor ingrowth, especially very early restenosis, and prolongs stent patency. We suggest that this procedure be considered rather than uncovered stent alone as the primary choice for palliation of obstruction in such patients.     

Comparison of short-and long-term outcomes following either insertion of self-expanding metallic stents or emergency surgery in malignant large bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND: Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are now regarded as a safe and effective treatment for an acute obstructing colorectal cancer. SEMS insertion is an invasive procedure that could potentially worsen prognosis. This study assessed the short-and long-term outcomes in patients stented for acute large bowel obstruction and in patients who underwent primary emergency surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 19 patients who underwent SEMS insertion and 23 patients who had primary emergency surgery for left-sided large bowel obstruction as the first presentation of colorectal cancer. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 19 patients in the SEMS group and the 23 patients in the primary emergency surgery group in terms of demographics and tumour location and stage. Stent insertion was successful in 16 patients (84%). One patient died from a stent-related perforation and another had a stoma fashioned for stent migration. Stents were a definitive procedure in 2 patients with advanced disease and acted as a "bridge to surgery" in the remaining 12 patients. Compared to the primary surgery group, there was a trend towards a higher primary anastomosis rate in the SEMS group (p=0.08); there were no significant differences in length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality or complication rates between the groups. Long-term prognosis (estimated 3-year survival) did not differ significantly between the groups (p=0.54); this persisted when only curative resections were considered (p=0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative stent insertion is a safe and effective treatment for large bowel obstruction, and may result in a higher primary anastomosis rate. Stent insertion does not seem to have a deleterious effect on prognosis.     

Resolution of an esophageal leak and posterior gastric wall necrosis with esophageal self-expandable metal stents

The use of weight reduction surgeries has increased over the years with a higher proportion of these surgeries being sleeve gastrectomies,this has been associated with some complications including staple line leaks.We report a 32-year-old male who had undergone a laparoscopic gastric band surgery and subsequently a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy,this was complicated by both an staple line leak at the gastroesophageal junction as well as a large(> 4 cm) posterior gastric wall defect due to gastric wall necrosis. We used two co-axially inserted self-expandable stents(SEMS) in the management of this patient,5 stents were used over repeated endoscopy sessions and 20 wk. Both defects had resolved without the need for surgical intervention.This is the first reported case were SEMS are used for both a staple line leak as well as a gastric wall defect.We also review the literature on the use of SEMS in the management of leaks post weight reduction surgeries.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: Long-term outcomes after removal of a self-expandable metal stent

AIM To assess the long-term outcomes of this procedure after removal of self-expandable metal stent(SEMS). The efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasoundguided gallbladder drainage(EUS-GBD) with SEMS were also assessed.METHODS Between January 2010 and April 2015, 12 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis, who were deemed unsuitable for cholecystectomy, underwent EUSGBD with a SEMS. EUS-GBD was performed under the guidance of EUS and fluoroscopy, by puncturing the gallbladder with a needle, inserting a guidewire, dilating the puncture hole, and placing a SEMS. TheSEMS was removed and/or replaced with a 7-Fr plastic pigtail stent after cholecystitis improved. The technical and clinical success rates, adverse event rate, and recurrence rate were all measured.RESULTS The rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events were 100%, 100%, and 0%, respectively. After cholecystitis improved, the SEMS was removed without replacement in eight patients, whereas it was replaced with a 7-Fr pigtail stent in four patients. Recurrence was seen in one patient(8.3%) who did not receive a replacement pigtail stent. The median follow-up period after EUS-GBD was 304 d(78-1492).CONCLUSION EUS-GBD with a SEMS is a possible alternative treatment for acute cholecystitis. Long-term outcomes after removal of the SEMS were excellent. Removal of the SEMS at 4-wk after SEMS placement and improvement of symptoms might avoid migration of the stent and recurrence of cholecystitis due to food impaction.     

SELF‐EXPANDABLE METALLIC STENT FOR PATIENTS WITH NON‐RESECTABLE MALIGNANT COLORECTAL STRICTURE: REVIEW OF 102 CASES IN THE JAPANESE LITERATURE

Alternative procedures using endoscopy have been developed, one of which is treatment with self‐expandable metallic stents (SEMS). In Japan, as SEMS for colorectal stricture has not been approved by the public insurance system, esophageal stent is used for colon and rectum exceptionally as a colonic SEMS after obtaining informed consent from the patient. This situation is very different to other countries. In the present study, we review the Japanese medical literature to determine the current status, feasibility, and challenges remaining for SEMS to show the current status of SEMS usage for colonic strictures in Japan. We investigated SEMS for patients with non‐resectable malignant colorectal stricture in 102 Japanese case reports. Primary colorectal cancer comprised half of the cases. The insertion success rate was 100% and the clinical effectiveness rate was 93%. Restricture occurred in 12 cases (12%), and half of those cases were treated by stent in stent. Stent migration occurred in eight cases (8%) and perforation in two cases (2%). The range of SEMS insertion duration was 1 to 576 days (mean: 132 days, median 142 days). There were no deaths related to the procedure. This procedure allows patients to forgo colostomy and is cheap, safe and effective, with a short treatment time. This procedure is a viable palliative alternative to colostomy for patients with inoperative malignant colorectal stricture. Widespread application of the procedure has been hampered.     

Appropriate routes of reconstruction following transthoracic esophagectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The effectiveness of reconstructive methods after esophagectomy remains controversial. METHODOLOGY: A total of 211 patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy and esophagogastric anastomosis using the gastric conduit were enrolled in this study. A retromediastinal approach was used in 79 patients and a retrosternal approach in 132. The surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In the retrosternal group, anastomotic leakage (26.5%), stenosis of the anastomosis (13.6%), and respiratory complications (18.2%) were frequently observed. Five patients died of aspiration pneumonia probably due to stenosis of the anastomotic site in the retrosternal group. In the retromediastinal group, two patients died from bleeding of a peptic ulcer in the gastric conduit. Partial resection of the manubrium significantly reduced the incidence of leakage in the retrosternal group (4/29 vs. 31/68, p=0.0305). Retrosternal approach and stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival whereas only stage was an independent prognostic factor for disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Retrosternal reconstruction is suggested as the unwillingly adopted method of choice after palliative esophagectomy (R2) for the following radiotherapy. Partial resection of the bony structures can be used to prevent postoperative morbidity in this operative procedure. Retromediastinal reconstruction is the possible method of choice in patients receiving curative esophagectomy.     

Clinical outcomes of palliative self-expanding metallic stents in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction

OBJECTIVE: Self‐expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are useful palliative option and a bridge to surgery in malignant colorectal obstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SEMS to palliate colorectal malignant obstruction. METHODS: Malignant colorectal obstructive patients who underwent SEMS insertion at the National Cancer Center, Korea from January 2004 to June 2008 were enrolled in the study. Patients' clinical characteristics, outcomes and complications for palliative SEMS insertion were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were enrolled in the palliative SEMS group and 48 patients with obstructive CRC were included in the SEMS as the bridge to surgery group. Obstruction of the left colon occurred in 52 patients of the palliative SEMS group and all patients in SEMS as bridge to surgery group. For primary SEMS insertion, the technical success (TS) rate was 87.0% and the clinical success (CS) rate 89.4%, while the rates of early and late complications were 24.1% and 23.4%, respectively. There was no procedure‐related mortality. Stent migration rate was higher in the cases treated with small diameter and covered type of stents. Median time to reobstruction and migration were 85 and 101 days, respectively. TS and CS rates for SEMS reinsertion were comparable to those for primary SEMS insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative SEMS are effective and favorable procedures for malignant colorectal obstruction but with some complications. Stent migration is associated with covered type and small diameter stents while other factors including length of stent and chemotherapy do not affect stent complications in the present study.     

SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and small bowel obstruction:High risk of migration in the covered stent group

AIM:To compare clinical success and complications of uncovered self-expanding metal stents(SEMS)vs covered SEMS(cSEMS)in obstruction of the small bowel.METHODS:Technical success,complications and outcome of endoscopic SEMS or cSEMS placement in tumor related obstruction of the duodenum or jejunum were retrospectively assessed.The primary end points were rates of stent migration and overgrowth.Secondary end points were the effect of concomitant biliary drainage on migration rate and overall survival.The data was analyzed according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.RESULTS:Thirty-two SEMS were implanted in 20 patients.In all patients,endoscopic stent implantation was successful.Stent migration was observed in 9 of16 cSEMS(56%)in comparison to 0/16 SEMS(0%)implantations(P=0.002).Stent overgrowth did not significantly differ between the two stent types(SEMS:3/16,19%;cSEMS:2/16,13%).One cSEMS dislodged and had to be recovered from the jejunum by way of laparotomy.Time until migration between SEMS and cSEMS in patients with and without concomitant biliary stents did not significantly differ(HR=1.530,95%CI0.731-6.306;P=0.556).The mean follow-up was 57±71 d(range:1-275 d).CONCLUSION:SEMS and cSEMS placement is safe in small bowel tumor obstruction.However,cSEMS is accompanied with a high rate of migration in comparison to uncovered SEMS.     

Modified gastric pull‐up reconstructions following pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy

Reconstruction following pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy is a challenging surgery to perform. Between April 2008 and August 2012, three types of modified gastric pull‐up reconstruction procedures, including a gastric tube creation combined with a free jejunal transfer (n = 7), elongated gastric tube creation with vascular anastomoses (n = 2) and pedunculated gastric tube creation with Roux‐en‐Y anastomosis (n = 5), were performed after pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy. To clarify feasibility of these reconstructive methods, we retrospectively analyzed the short‐term outcomes. There were no graft failures. Salivary fistulae were observed in two cases after high pharyngoenteral anastomoses due to oropharyngeal extension of hypopharyngeal cancers. Overall morbidity rate was 21.4%, and no deaths occurred. Although the operation time was shortest for pedunculated gastric tube reconstructions, morbidity rates were similar among all methods. All three types of modified gastric pull‐up reconstruction procedures can be performed safely. We can choose one of these methods according to the tumor status and the patient condition, understanding advantages and disadvantages of each procedure.     

Esophageal stent fracture:case report and review of the literature

Endoscopic esophageal stent placement is widely used in the treatment of a variety of benign and malignant esophageal conditions.Self expanding metal stents(SEMS)are associated with significantly reduced stent related mortality and morbidity compared to plastic stents for treatment of esophageal conditions;however they have known complications of stent migration,stent occlusion,tumor ingrowth,stricture formation,reflux,bleeding and perforation amongst others.A rare and infrequently reported complication of SEMS is stent fracture and subsequent migration of the broken pieces.There have only been a handful of published case reports describing this problem.In this report we describe a case of a spontaneously fractured nitinol esophageal SEMS,and review the available literature on the unusual occurrence of SEMS fracture placed for benign or malignant obstruction in the esophagus.SEMS fracture could be a potentially dangerous event and should be considered in a patient having recurrent dysphagia despite successful placement of an esopha-geal SEMS.It usually requires endoscopic therapy and may unfortunately require surgery for retrieval of a distally migrated fragment.Early recognition and prompt management may be able to prevent further problems.     

Which types of stent, uncovered or covered, should be used in gastric outlet obstructions?

BACKGROUND: Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) have been widely used in inoperable malignant gastric outlet obstructions, but stent obstructions caused by tumor ingrowth and migration are a major problem of SEMS. The aims of this study were to assess the rate of stent restenosis, to identify lesion characteristics related to early restenosis by tumor ingrowth, and, in particular, to find suitable patient groups for uncovered or covered stents at first implantation. METHODS: Forty-nine patients were reviewed: stomach cancer in 34 patients, primary duodenal cancer in 3 patients, pancreatic cancer in 5 patients, and common bile duct cancer in 7 patients. In principle, uncovered stents were initially placed at the time when obstruction symptoms occurred and the endoscope would not pass through. Stent obstruction due to tumor ingrowth within 4 weeks after the first stent implantation was regarded as early stent restenosis. RESULTS: Technical success was seen in 49/49 patients (100%). Migration did not occur. Stent obstructions caused by tumor overgrowth were found in 2/49 patients (4.1%) after 1 month. Stent obstructions caused by tumor ingrowth occurred in 14/49 patients (28.5%), and 7 of them (14.3%) were found to have early restenosis. The only statistically significant factor for early restenosis was stenosis site, and early restenosis was more frequent in the postoperative anastomosis site in the current study; a) 2/18 antropyloric obstructions (11.1%), b) 1/15 pyloric and duodenal bulb obstructions (6.7%), c) 0/10 duodenal second portion obstructions (0%), and d) 4/6 postoperative anastomosis site obstructions (66.7) (P < 0.05, 95% CI 0.003-0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Uncovered stents are technically feasible and effective for most malignant gastric outlet obstructions. However, because of frequent early restenosis among patients with postoperative anastomosis site obstructions, the placement of covered or simultaneous dual stents to prevent early restenosis should be considered when stenting postoperative anastomosis site obstructions.