Are second primary head and neck cancers with previous hematological malignancy more aggressive than de novo head and neck cancers?

ObjectivesSecondary solid tumors can occur after the treatment of hematological malignancies and are associated with a poor prognosis. We evaluated the survival outcomes of patients with second primary head and neck cancers according to the site of cancer origin, type of hematological malignancy, and age.Materials and methodsWe enrolled all patients who underwent surgery for second primary head and neck cancer and were previously treated for hematological malignancy between 1997 and 2020. We analyzed the survival outcomes of patients with second primary head and neck cancer, and compared them with 3126 de novo head and neck cancer patients diagnosed during the same period at our hospital.ResultsThe 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly worse for second primary head and neck cancer patients than de novo cancer patients (52.0 % and 77.9 %, respectively; p = 0.04) and those results were similarly observed in second primary oral cavity cancer (33.3 % and 75.7 %, respectively; p < 0.01). Patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia showed significantly worse 5-year OS rate than those with other types of hematological malignancies (p = 0.036). Multivariate analysis showed that bone marrow transplantation (BMT) was a risk factor for the recurrence of head and neck cancers (odds ratio = 6.635, p = 0.042).ConclusionPatients with second primary head and neck cancer, particularly of the oral cavity, had a worse prognosis than patients with de novo head and neck cancer. BMT predicts recurrence in second primary head and neck cancer patients.     

Diagnostic sensitivity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detecting synchronous multiple primary cancers in head and neck cancer patients

We assessed the sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET) for detecting synchronous multiple primary cancers, particularly synchronous esophageal cancers in head and neck cancer patients. We retrospectively reviewed 230 head and neck cancer patients. All the patients routinely underwent the following examinations: urinalysis, occult blood, tumor marker detection [squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)], esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy (when CEA was high or occult blood was positive), abdominal ultrasonography, plain chest computed tomography (CT), and PET. Bronchoscopy was performed when CT revealed lung shadow of central region. Synchronous multiple primary cancers were detected in 42 (18.2%) patients. The diagnostic sensitivity of PET for synchronous primary cancers was as follows: esophagus, 7.6% (1/13); stomach, 25.0% (2/8); lung, 66.7% (4/6); head and neck, 75.0% (3/4); colon, 0% (0/1); kidney, 0% (0/1); and subcutaneous, 100% (1/1). The sensitivity of PET for detecting synchronous esophageal cancers is low because these are early-stage cancers (almost stage 0–I). Therefore, it is necessary to perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy for detecting synchronous esophageal cancers. PET is an important additional tool for detecting synchronous multiple primary cancers because the diagnostic sensitivity of PET in synchronous head and neck cancer and lung cancer is high. But PET has the limitation of sensitivity for synchronous multiple primary cancers because the diagnostic sensitivity of PET in synchronous esophageal cancer is very low.     

Diagnostic utility of positron emission tomography-computed tomography for predicting malignancy in cystic neck masses in adults

OBJECTIVES: Combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) is used for the diagnostic evaluation and staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). By superimposing anatomic localization of CT with the physiologic data of PET, occult primary and metastatic neoplasms might be identified. Because the diagnostic algorithm for cystic neck masses in adults often overlaps with the work-up of cancer of unknown primary site, we evaluated the utility of PET-CT scans to identify the presence of malignancy and the location of primary tumor. STUDY DESIGN: Single-institution retrospective case review series. METHODS: We reviewed the PET-CT imaging of cystic neck masses occurring in five patients over 40 years of age with significant risk factors for SCCHN and correlated this information with histopathology. RESULTS: In each patient in our series, the PET portion of a combined PET-CT was misleading, whereas the CT examination was more suggestive of the correct pathology. Ultimately, clinical judgment and endoscopic evaluation, guided by CT findings, were most valuable for distinguishing malignant versus benign processes and identifying the primary tumor sites. CONCLUSIONS: PET-CT may not be a reliable modality for identifying malignancy in adults with suspicious cystic neck masses. A thorough clinical evaluation by an experienced head and neck surgeon, in conjunction with contrast-enhanced CT, may be sufficient to facilitate the optimal management of such patients.     

Second primary tumors in head and neck cancer

IntroductionThe development of second primary tumors (SPT) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has become an increasingly important factor in clinical treatment decisions.PurposeTo define favourable clinical characteristics for overall survival, in patients with SP head and neck cancer.Material and methodRecords of 633 patients with SCC treated from 1984 to 2004 were reviewed to describe clinical characteristics of the SPT.ResultsThe overall incidence of SPT was 11%. The incidence of the index tumors was as follows: supraglottic cancer 21% and oral cancer 16%. The most common SPT occurred in head and neck area in 47%, lung in 32% and esophagus in 11%. Second primary was associated with a poor 5 years survival in patients with HN-SCC (23 versus 53% in control group).ConclusionBecause of the high rate of second primary tumors, protocols including chemoprophylaxis should be investigated. Prevention and early detection are indicated.     

A prospective study of PET-FDG imaging for the assessment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The main aim of the study was to evaluate the use of positron emission tomography using fluoro-deoxyglucose (PET-FDG) imaging for the detection of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Fifty-four consecutive patients with malignancies involving the head and neck were studied prospectively. Thirty-one patients presented with primary disease and 23 were suspected of recurrent or residual disease. All patients underwent full clinical staging, PET-FDG scans and anatomical imaging, 37 underwent computed tomography (CT), 13 magnetic resonance (MR) and four had both CT and MR. Clinical assessment, CT/MR, PET-FDG and histological examination were all evaluated independently of each other. All 31 primary head and neck malignant tumours were detected by PET-FDG. Based on 16 patients who underwent neck dissections, the sensitivity and specificity of PET-FDG for detecting nodal disease was 67% and 100% respectively, compared with clinical assessment of 58% and 75% and CT/MR of 67% and 25%. In all 12 patients, PET-FDG correctly identified the presence or absence of recurrent or residual disease. PET-FDG staged 13 post-treatment necks with an accuracy of 100%, as compared to CT/MR which was accurate in 7 of 13 and clinical assessment which was accurate in eight. Three sites of abnormal tracer uptake unrelated to malignancy were recorded as incidental findings (mandibular osteomyelitis, 1; post glossectomy site, 2). PET-FDG was more accurate than CT/MR for identifying primary and recurrent tumours as well as metastatic lesions in the neck. If these diagnostic properties of PET-FDG are confirmed in further prospective studies, it could prove a valuable adjunct for the management of head and neck cancer.     

18F-FDG-PET/CT interpretation pitfalls in patients with head and neck cancer

AimThe aim of the present study is to raise awareness of ENT Surgeons on the limitations of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in head and neck cancer by presenting illustrative cases from our department archives.Materials and methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients with head and neck cancer treated in our ENT department from 2015 to 2020. Cases with various interpretation pitfalls due to false-positive and false-negative PET/CT results that lead to diagnostic dilemmas and treatment delays either in their pre-therapeutic work-up or in their post-therapeutic monitoring were included.ResultsFive cases of various image interpretation pitfalls (3 false negative and 2 false positive cases) were identified and are presented in detail.ConclusionsAlthough ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT has gained in popularity and improved head and neck cancer management, clinicians should be aware of its limitations. The combination of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT with other imaging modalities can reduce the number of interpretation pitfalls but by no means will substitute sound clinical judgement.     

Comparison between 18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging techniques (CT SCAN and MRI) in the diagnosis of head and neck tumor suspicion of recurrence

BackgroundThis study aimed to assess the results obtained with the positron emission tomography (PET) and conventional anatomic imaging methods (CT scan and MRI) in the diagnosis of suspicion of tumor recurrence in head and neck cancers.MethodsThirty patients with suspicion of tumor recurrence due to head and neck cancers were reviewed retrospectively. Consequently, 34 PET studies were performed. The images were obtained in the PET Institute of Madrid. They were interpreted by visual and semiquantitative analysis. The results were confirmed with clinical followup, response to treatment or with histological studies in some cases.ResultsSensitivity and specificity of the PET were 95.6% and 81.8% respectively, while it was 65% and 80% for the CT scan/MRI.ConclusionsWe can conclude that PET provides better results than conventional imaging techniques in the detection of head and neck cancer recurrence.     

Limitations of PET and PET/CT in detecting upper gastrointestinal synchronous cancer in patients with head and neck carcinoma

The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of PET (positron emission tomography) or PET/CT (fusion images of PET with computed tomography) in detecting synchronous cancer in patients with head and neck carcinoma. We reviewed 682 patients with carcinoma of the head and neck between January 2001 and December 2010. In 98 patients, 111 synchronous cancers were diagnosed. Of these 98 patients, the index cancer was predominantly located in the hypopharynx (47 cases), followed by the larynx (23 cases), oropharynx (12 cases) and the oral cavity (6 cases). Esophageal cancer was diagnosed as the most synchronous cancer (57 lesions), followed by gastric cancer (20 lesions), lung cancer (9 lesions) and head and neck cancer (8 lesions). Among these 98 patients, PET or PET/CT was performed in 82 patients. Of these 82 patients, PET or PET/CT detected 34 out of 94 (36.2 %) synchronous cancers. No significant difference was observed between PET and PET/CT in terms of lesion detectability (p = 0.21). Regarding synchronous T1 and Tis upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer, PET or PET/CT detected 4 out of 43 (9.3 %) of the cancers. No statistical difference in detectability was observed in patients who underwent PET or PET/CT scanning before or after histological examination of synchronous UGI cancer. In conclusion, synchronous cancer was most frequently observed in the UGI, especially in the esophagus in patients with head and neck carcinoma. PET and PET/CT have limitations in the detection of these lesions.     

How good is a chest CT scan at predicting the risk of pulmonary metastatic disease in patients with head and neck cancer? A retrospective observational study

Clin. Otolaryngol. 2010, 35 , 474–478 Objectives: Our objectives were to assess whether a CT chest, when performed as part of initial staging investigations, is a robust method to identify lung metastases or synchronous primary lung cancers in patients with head and neck squamous cell and whether small nodules are likely to represent metastases in this group of patients. Design: Retrospective observational study performed between 1994 and 2005. Setting: Head and neck cancer department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham. Participants: All patients that were included had a new head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and underwent a CT chest as part of their staging investigation. Main outcome measures: The presence of lung masses on the initial screening CT of the chest as determined by the radiologist’s report. The development of lung metastases or primary bronchogenic carcinoma in any patient. Results: Two hundred and thirty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. 38 (16%) patients had a CT chest report for a lung malignancy (either metastatic or primary bronchogenic), 33 of these 38 (87%) patients actually had a lung malignancy. 32 (13%) patients had a CT chest report for a small nodule, three of these 32 (9%) patients were later diagnosed with a lung malignancy, all at a different site to the nodule. 169 (71%) patients had normal CT chest reports, of these 3 (2%) patients were later diagnosed with a lung malignancy. Conclusions: The CT chest is a useful screening tool but is not infallible. Small nodules should be taken seriously and monitored, but should not alter the initial decision as to the management of the patient.     

Impact of [18F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography on previously untreated head and neck cancer patients

OBJECTIVES: The role of fused modality [F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in diagnosing and accurately staging patients with primary, metastatic, and recurrent head and neck (HN) cancer is evolving, and the clinical implications need to be further defined. A few retrospective studies have been performed, but adequate sample sizes are lacking because the number of HN cancer patients is relatively small. This study evaluates the positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT in previously untreated HN cancer patients at a single tertiary care institution. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of this new technology in the management of previously untreated HN cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort outcomes study at a tertiary National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board exemption #4 (45 CFR 46.101 [4]) criteria were applied for and accepted by the office of responsible research practices at the Ohio State University College of Medicine. The authors identified 268 consecutive PET/CT examinations between March 2005 and January 2006 for HN cancer ordered by the two senior authors at the James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute of the Ohio State University Medical Center. PET/CT examinations were interpreted by one of three neuroradiologists. PPV, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, diagnostic upstaging, and treatment management changes were determined from subset analysis of 123 previously untreated patients with HN cancer. Synchronous lesions were detected in 10 patients with use of this modality. PET/CT was also used to help manage 22 patients with unknown primary HN cancer. The statistics were verified by comparing PET/CT results with surgical specimen histopathology. RESULTS:: PET/CT was true-positive in 82.9% (102/123), with a per patient PPV of 87.2% and a per lesion PPV of 89.4%. PET/CT was false-positive in 12.2% (15/123) of patients and had a false-positive rate of 8.3% when calculated per lesion. In 67 patients who underwent neck dissection, PET/CT had a PPV of 92.7%. The accuracy was 89.7% in 20 patients who had bilateral neck dissections. The unknown primary site was found in 72.7% (16/22) of patients with unknown primary HN cancer. Synchronous lesions were found in 8.1% of patients by PET/CT, with a PPV of 66.6%. Distant metastases were detected in 15.4% (19/123) of patients. Treatment was altered in 30.9% (38/123) of patients as a result of this imaging modality. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of the PET/CT imaging modality resides in its fusion of anatomic detail of the HN region with the sensitivity of detecting tumors with increased metabolic activity at distant sites. Treatment was altered in 30.9% of our previously untreated HN cancer patients because of this imaging technique, with altered treatment including upstaging, diagnosing distant and unresectable disease, and working-up second primary malignancies. The false-positive findings did not result in additional morbidity to these patients. Although PET/CT is sensitive in detecting occult cervical nodal metastases, it does not yet have the ability to replace neck dissection as the diagnostic standard of care. This study supports the use of PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed HN cancer because of its high PPV and superiority of detecting distant metastases and synchronous lesions.     

The role of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in nodal staging of clinical and radiological N0 head and neck cancers

The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging on nodal staging for head and neck cancers. This was a retrospectively analyzed single institution study. The study population consisted of 36 patients with head and neck cancers who were evaluated with PET/CT and went on to neck dissection. All of them had clinically and radiographically negative neck (N₀) and each patient underwent PET/CT imaging before undergoing selective neck dissection for N₀ disease. Tissues were submitted for histopathologic examination and were oriented for the pathologist to permit correlation between the histopathologic findings and the imaging results. The sizes of the lymph nodes and the maximum standardized uptake values (SUV_max) measured from PET/CT images were compared with the histopathologic findings. All primary tumors were visualized with PET/CT. On histopathological examination, 19 patients had positive and 17 patients had negative lymph nodes. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to predict the optimal corrected SUV_max cutoffs; the optimal value was 2.95 for respective outcomes of lymph node involvement. This cutoff value yielded 84.2 % sensitivity and 76.5 % specificity for nodal-level staging. PET/CT proved to be accurate in 27 (75 %) patients and inaccurate in 9 (25 %) patients. PET/CT was a valuable tool to assess nodal stage of head and neck cancers, and should be considered before surgical treatment.     

Positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose for suspected head and neck tumor recurrence in the symptomatic patient

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) in the treatment of patients suspected of having head and neck cancer recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective and consecutive inclusion of 44 patients presenting with clinical symptoms suggestive of head and neck tumor recurrence. METHODS: FDG-PET was compared with combined computed tomography (CT) plus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures for the differential diagnosis between tumor recurrence and benign post-therapeutic changes. For FDG-PET, the potential additional value of semiquantitative indexes was studied. The impact on patient treatment (i.e., their ability to accurately select patients for panendoscopic exploration) was analyzed retrospectively for both CT+MRI and PET workups. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy was found higher for PET than for combined CT+MRI: sensitivity ranged from 96% to 73%, specificity from 61% to 50%, and accuracy from 81% to 64% for PET and CT+MRI, respectively. The accuracy of FDG-PET was the highest (94%) in patients included more than 12 weeks after the end of therapy. In 15 discordant cases, PET was correct in 11 and CT+MRI in 4. Patient selection for panendoscopic exploration and biopsy was correct in 79% and 50% of patients with FDG-PET and CT+MRI, respectively. Quantification of FDG uptake had no additional value over visual analysis alone, although we found that a SUVlbm (standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass) threshold of 3 could be helpful in patients scanned less than 12 weeks after the end of therapy. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET has a major additional diagnostic value to CT+MRI for the evaluation of the symptomatic patient suspected of having head and neck cancer recurrence. PET could have a direct impact on management by correctly selecting patients in whom a panendoscopic exploration with biopsy is indicated.     

The value of PET/CT to assess clinically negative necks

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of [¹⁸F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in evaluating metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to the cervical lymph nodes, with specific attention to the efficacy in regard to clinically negative necks. This was a retrospective review of 243 patients with HNSCC between years 2005 and 2007 treated at a comprehensive cancer care institution who underwent pre-operative PET/CT and neck dissection with either an N0 (112 patients) or N+ (131 patients) clinical nodal status. PET/CT findings were correlated with histopathological results of surgical specimens. A majority of the primary sites were oral cavity and oropharynx (70%), followed by larynx, unknown primary and hypopharynx. In the group of 112 patients who underwent 144 neck dissections with N0 nodal status, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive (NPV) and accuracy were 57, 82, 59, 80 and 74%, respectively. In the group of 131 patients who underwent 169 neck dissections with N+ nodal status, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 93, 70, 96, 58 and 91%, respectively. PET/CT has a much reduced rate of efficacy for the clinically negative neck compared to the clinically positive neck. PET/CT in its current stage does not appear to offer an advantage in staging the clinically N0 neck due to high rates of false positives and negatives.     

Clinical value of 18FDG PET/CT in screening for distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Objectives

The detection of distant metastases is of major importance in management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Design

All patients underwent ¹⁸FDG PET/CT for the detection of distant metastases.

Setting

Retrospective single‐centre study.

Participants

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with high‐risk factors for distant metastases.

Main outcome measures

Accuracy of ¹⁸FDG PET/CT for the detection of distant metastases using clinical development of distant metastases and a minimal follow‐up of twelve months as reference standard. Comparison of overall survival between patients diagnosed with distant metastases during initial screening and patients diagnosed with distant metastases during follow‐up.

Results

In 23 (12%) of the 190 patients, ¹⁸FDG PET/CT detected distant metastases at screening. Sensitivity and negative predictive value were 46.2% (95% CI 32.6‐59.7) and 82.6% (95% CI 76.8‐88.5). No difference in median overall survival from the time of distant metastases detection was found between patients diagnosed with DM during work‐up or during follow‐up.

Conclusions

In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with high‐risk factors, ¹⁸FDG PET/CT has a high negative predictive value for the detection of distant metastases and should be used in daily clinical practice, although the sensitivity is limited when long‐term follow‐up is used as reference standard.     

FDG PET and PET/CT for the detection of the primary tumour in patients with cervical non-squamous cell carcinoma metastasis of an unknown primary

In patients with a neck metastasis from an unknown primary with non-squamous cell cancer (non-SCC) histology, the primary is often located outside the head and neck area. We retrospectively evaluated 326 patient records and found 14 patients with non-SCC neck lymph node metastasis from an unknown primary undergoing whole body F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with or without coregistered computed tomography (PET/CT). The PET or PET/CT findings were verified by pathological work-up, additional imaging tests, and clinical follow-up. PET detected pathological FDG uptake suspicious for the primary in eight patients. PET or PET/CT findings were true positive in seven patients, true negative in 4, false positive in 1, and false negative in two patients. In one patient PET/CT revealed a synchronous ovarian carcinoma. The results suggest that whole body imaging with FDG PET and PET/CT can be useful to identify unknown primaries of non-SCC origin. However, the work-up of patients undergoing PET or PET/CT in our study was very heterogeneous and the primary was more likely found in patients without extensive imaging before PET scanning. Further studies should evaluate if the histology of a neck nodal metastasis should influence the choice of the imaging method and the role of PET and PET/CT imaging for the work up of patients with a non-SCC neck lymph node metastasis of an unknown primary.     

Current concepts in the management of a second malignancy of the lung in patients with head and neck cancer

Simultaneous, synchronous, and metachronous presentation of lung malignancies when treating head and neck squamous cell cancers is one of the most difficult challenges in head and neck surgery. However, good (> 40%) 5-year survival can be obtained when proper screening techniques, patient selection, and therapy are combined. Because of the complexity of the head and neck resection and reconstruction and the multiple surgical and medical services used to diagnose and treat this clinical entity, a comprehensive review of the current literature is provided. The clinically pertinent meanings of simultaneous, synchronous, and metachronous second malignancy of the lung are presented. A review of the current literature is presented that divides second lung malignancy into two groups: second primary and metastasis. The incidence of a second lung malignancy is identified. The tools used in the screening of high-risk patients and the role of the new diagnostic studies such as positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography CT scans are reviewed. Finally, the current literature on patient selection and surgical therapy is used to put forth a clinical pathway followed at the authors' institution for the treatment of these patients.     

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and metachronous second primaries

ObjectivesTo assess the rate of second (or more) primaries after treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and survival compared to patients with a single head and neck cancer.Material and methodA single-center retrospective study was performed in a University Hospital Center in 541 patients between 2002 and 2010.ResultsOne hundred and forty-one patients (26.06%) presented 172 metachronous cancers. Overall 5-year survival was 20.3% with and 38.1% without metachronous cancer. Median and mean survival were respectively 21.9 and 51 months in patients with a single cancer, versus 13.9 and 26.5 months in case of metachronous cancer. Specific survival was comparable to overall survival. All-cause and specific survival were significantly poorer in metachronous cancer (P = 0.001; log-rank α = 0.05).ConclusionAt least a quarter of HNSCC patients go on to develop a metachronous second primary. These are of poor prognosis, whatever their location.     

Cribado de cáncer de cabeza y cuello en pacientes candidatos a trasplante hepático

IntroductionLiver transplantation is the only alternative treatment in patients in end-stage liver function. In many cases the need for liver transplantation is a consequence of the toxic effects of alcohol.The aim of our study was to determine if patients who are candidates for a liver transplant require a systematic exploration of the head and neck to rule out malignant lesions in this area.Patients and methodsAll the candidates for a liver transplant, between 2011 and 2017, were included in our study. All of them underwent a systematic exploration of the head and neck by an otolaryngologist to rule out malignancy of the head and neck.ResultsA total of 141 patients were included in our study. In 2 of them (1.3%) a carcinoma of the head and neck was detected (one of the oropharynx and the other of the larynx). Both patients were asymptomatic from an ENT point of view. They were treated with chemoradiotherapy. One of them died during follow-up due to the appearance of a metachronous lung tumour. The other is free of disease 2 years after diagnosis but without having been transplanted. Both patients had a history of smoking and high alcohol intake.ConclusionsIn patients who are candidates for a liver transplant who have a history of smoking and / or high alcohol intake, a pretransplant head and neck study including pharyngo-laryngeal fibroscopy is indicated.     

The use of combined PET/CT for localizing recurrent head and neck cancer: the Pittsburgh experience

We performed a retrospective study of 47 patients to ascertain the ability of combined positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) to localize recurrent head and neck cancer. When clinically warranted, biopsies were performed in an attempt to obtain pathologic confirmation of the PET/CT findings. Of the 47 patients, 33 exhibited PET/CT findings consistent with recurrent cancer. Of the 33 patients, 25 underwent either biopsy or surgical excision of disease in an attempt to obtain a pathologic confirmation. Biopsy analysis confirmed the PET/CT findings in 22 of these patients; in the remaining 3 patients, pathologic findings were inconsistent with the PET/CT diagnosis. Based on the subset of 25 patients who underwent pathologic testing, the sensitivity of combined PET/CT was 95% and the specificity was 60%. We conclude that combined PET/CT imaging is a valuable tool for localizing tumor recurrence in patients with head and neck cancer.     

Unilateral vocal cord paralysis causes contralateral false-positive positron emission tomography scans of the larynx

Positron emission tomography (PET) is used in the management of head and neck cancers. It identifies tissue with increased metabolic activity and is not specific for malignancy. A false-positive PET scan of the larynx is associated with vocal cord paralysis. We reviewed PET scan reports of patients with lung cancer from 1998 to 2001 to identify patients with increased 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose uptake in the larynx without a known history of head and neck cancer and then correlated this increased uptake with laryngoscopic findings. There were 17 patients who had a positive PET finding in the larynx. Fifteen of those had a false-positive PET scan in the larynx. All had contralateral vocal cord paralysis. Two patients were noted to have head and neck cancer. We conclude that vocal cord paralysis can cause a false-positive PET scan on the contralateral side of the larynx due to overactivity of laryngeal muscles that compensate for the paralyzed cord.