Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) previously developed three prognostic classes for brain metastases using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of a large database. These classes were based on Karnofsky performance status (KPS), primary tumor status, presence of extracranial system metastases, and age. An analysis of RTOG 91-04, a randomized study comparing two dose-fractionation schemes with a comparison to the established RTOG database, was considered important to validate the RPA classes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 445 patients were randomized on RTOG 91-04, a Phase III study of accelerated hyperfractionation versus accelerated fractionation. No difference was observed between the two treatment arms with respect to survival. Four hundred thirty-two patients were included in this analysis. The majority of the patients were under age 65, had KPS 70-80, primary tumor controlled, and brain-only metastases. The initial RPA had three classes, but only patients in RPA Classes I and II were eligible for RTOG 91-04. RESULTS: For RPA Class I, the median survival time was 6. 2 months and 7.1 months for 91-04 and the database, respectively. The 1-year survival was 29% for 91-04 versus 32% for the database. There was no significant difference in the two survival distributions (p = 0.72). For RPA Class II, the median survival time was 3.8 months for 91-04 versus 4.2 months for the database. The 1-year survival was 12% and 16% for 91-04 and the database, respectively (p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates that the RPA classes are valid and reliable for historical comparisons. Both the RTOG and other clinical trial organizers should currently utilize this RPA classification as a stratification factor for clinical trials.     

Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for small-cell lung cancer-only brain metastases

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) developed a prognostic classification based on a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of patient pretreatment characteristics from three completed brain metastases randomized trials. Clinical trials for patients with brain metastases generally exclude small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cases. We hypothesize that the RPA classes are valid in the setting of SCLC brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of 154 SCLC patients with brain metastases treated between April 1983 and May 2005 was performed. RPA criteria used for class assignment were Karnofsky performance status (KPS), primary tumor status (PT), presence of extracranial metastases (ED), and age. RESULTS: Median survival was 4.9 months, with 4 patients (2.6%) alive at analysis. Median follow-up was 4.7 months (range, 0.3-40.3 months). Median age was 65 (range, 42-85 years). Median KPS was 70 (range, 40-100). Number of patients with controlled PT and no ED was 20 (13%) and with ED, 27 (18%); without controlled PT and ED, 34 (22%) and with ED, 73 (47%). RPA class distribution was: Class I: 8 (5%); Class II: 96 (62%); Class III: 51 (33%). Median survivals (in months) by RPA class were: Class I: 8.6; Class II: 4.2; Class III: 2.3 (p = 0.0023). CONCLUSIONS: Survivals for SCLC-only brain metastases replicate the results from the RTOG RPA classification. These classes are therefore valid for brain metastases from SCLC, support the inclusion of SCLC patients in future brain metastases trials, and may also serve as a basis for historical comparisons.     

Implant volume as a prognostic variable in brachytherapy decision-making for malignant gliomas stratified by the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis.

PURPOSE: When an initial retrospective review of malignant glioma patients (MG) undergoing brachytherapy was carried out using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) criteria, it revealed that glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cases benefit the most from implant. In the present study, we focused exclusively on these GBM patients stratified by RPA survival class and looked at the relationship between survival and implanted target volume, to distinguish the prognostic value of volume in general and for a given GBM class. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1991 and 1998, 75 MG patients were treated with surgery, external beam radiation, and stereotactic iodine-125 (I-125) implant. Of these, 53 patients (70.7%) had GBMs, with 52 (98%) having target volume (TV) data for analysis. Stratification by RPA criteria showed 12, 26, 13, and 1 patients in classes III to VI, respectively. For analysis purposes, classes V and VI were merged. There were 27 (51.9%) male and 25 (48.1%) female patients. Mean age was 57.5 years (range 14-79). Median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 90 (range 50-100). Median follow-up time was 11 months (range 2-79). RESULTS: At analysis, 18 GBM patients (34.6%) were alive and 34 (65.4%) were dead. Two-year and 5-year survivals were 42% and 17.5%, respectively, with a median survival time (MST) of 16 months. Two-year survivals and MSTs for the implanted GBM patients compared to the RTOG database were as follows: 74% vs. 35% and 28 months vs. 17.9 months for class III; 32% vs. 15% and 16 months vs. 11.1 months for class IV; 29% vs. 6% and 11 months vs. 8.9 months for class V/VI. Mean implanted TV was 15.5 cc (range 0.8-78), which corresponds to a spherical implant diameter of 3.1 cm. Plotting survival as a function of 5-cc TV increments suggested a trend toward poorer survival as the implanted volume increases. The impact of incremental changes in TV on survival within a given RPA class of GBMs was compared to the RTOG database. Looking at absolute differences in MSTs: for classes III and IV, there was little effect of different TVs on survival; for class V/VI, a survival benefit to implantation was still seen at the target volume cutoff (TV > 25 cc). Within a given RPA class, no significant differences were found within class III; for class IV, the most significant difference was at 10 cc (p = 0.05); and for class V/VI, at 20 cc (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: For all GBM patients, an inverse relationship between implanted TV size and median survival is suggested by this study. However, when GBM patients are stratified using the RTOG's RPA criteria, the prognostic effect of implant volume disappears within each RPA survival class. At the critical volume of 25 cc, which approximates an implant of 5-cm diameter (upper implantation limit of many CNS brachytherapy protocols), the "poorest" prognosis GBM patients stratified by RPA still demonstrate a survival benefit with implant. We suggest that any GBM patient meeting brachytherapy recognized size criteria be considered for I-125 implant.     

Fractionated pre-operative stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis

Journal of Neuro-Oncology - The current standard of care for patients with a large brain metastasis and limited intracranial disease burden is surgical resection and post-operative single fraction...     

Patients with brain metastases: hope for recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class 3.

PURPOSE: The objectives of the present study were (a) to validate the prognostic classification derived from recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG); (b) to identify prognostic factors in class 3; (c) to examine the impact of treatment related variables on the prognosis in class 3. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred and sixteen patients with brain metastases had resection and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT, n = 257) or WBRT alone (n = 659) at our institution from 1985 to 2000. Patients were grouped into RPA classes 1, 2, and 3 (n = 67, 441, and 408, respectively). RESULTS: Median survival of the whole group was 3.4 months. Median survival in classes 1, 2, and 3 was 8.2, 4.9, and 1.8 months, respectively. In class 3, age (<65 years vs. > or =65 years, relative risk (RR) 0.75), status of the primary tumor (controlled vs. uncontrolled, RR 0.86), and the number of brain metastases (single vs. multiple, RR 0.76) were independent prognostic variables. We defined three prognostic subgroups: class 3a (n = 51): age <65 years, controlled primary tumor, single brain metastasis; class 3c (n = 44): age > or =65 years, uncontrolled primary tumor, multiple brain metastases; class 3b (n = 313): all other patients. Median survival in classes 3a, 3b, and 3c was 3.2, 1.9, and 1.2 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). Intra-class comparisons showed that resection followed by WBRT yielded significantly better survival compared with WBRT alone. CONCLUSION: Our results validate the RTOG RPA classification for patients with brain metastases. The variables age, status of the primary, and number of brain metastases allow the division of class 3 into prognostic subgroups. Even class 3 patients may benefit from more aggressive treatment strategies.     

The use of recursive partitioning analysis grouping in patients with brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the use of recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) grouping in an attempt to predict the survival probabilities in patients with brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Seventy-two patients with brain metastases from NSCLC treated with radiation therapy were included in the study. Sixty-three patients were male and nine patients were female. Their median age was 57 years and their median Karnofsky performance status was 70. At the time of brain metastases, there was no evidence of the intrathoracic disease in 27 patients and the extrathoracic disease was limited to the intracranial disease in 42 patients. In accordance with RPA grouping, 12 patients were in Group 1, 24 patients were in Group 2, and 36 patients were in Group 3. Radiation therapy was delivered to the whole brain at a dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions in most of the patients. RESULTS: The median survival time was 7 months for Group 1, 5 months for Group 2 and 3 months for Group 3. The survival probability at 1 year was 50% for Group 1, 26% for Group 2 and 14% for Group 3. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents evidence supporting the use of RPA grouping in an attempt to predict the survival probabilities in patients with brain metastases from NSCLC.     

Results of whole brain radiotherapy and recursive partitioning analysis in patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study

PURPOSE: To determine the benefit of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and the use of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification system in patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 46 consecutive patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma who were treated with WBRT at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between 1983 and 2000. We reviewed their charts for patient and tumor characteristics and categorized them according to the RTOG RPA classes. RESULTS: The median follow-up and survival time for all 46 patients (15 women and 31 men) was 3.0 months. The median radiation dose was 3000 cGy in 10 fractions. Patients who received higher radiation doses (>3000 cGy) survived longer than those who received 3000 cGy or less than 3000 cGy (8.5 months vs. 2.7 months vs. 0.4 months, p = 0.0289). However, the Karnofsky performance status and RPA class were confounding factors in these data. The median survival for patients by RTOG RPA class was 8.5 months for Class I (n = 2), 3 months for Class II (n = 37), and 0.6 months for Class III (n = 7, p = 0.0834). CONCLUSION: Despite the relatively poor prognosis of patients who receive WBRT alone, it appears that they benefit from this palliative treatment. The RTOG RPA classification system may be a useful tool in assessing prognosis in this patient population.     

Resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: an RTOG recursive partitioning analysis of ALA study patients

The benefit of cytoreductive surgery for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is unclear, and selection bias in past series has been observed. The 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) study investigated the influence of fluorescence-guided resections on outcome and generated an extensive database of GBM patients with optimized resections. We evaluated whether the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG-RPA) would predict survival of these patients and whether there was any benefit from extensive resections depending on RPA class. A total of 243 per-protocol patients with newly diagnosed GBM were operated on with or without ALA and treated by radiotherapy. Postoperative MRI was obtained in all patients. Patients were allocated into RTOG-RPA classes III-V based on age, KPS, neurological condition, and mental status (as derived from the NIH Stroke Scale). Median overall survival among RPA classes III, IV, and V was 17.8, 14.7, and 10.7 months, respectively, with 2-year survival rates of 26%, 12%, and 7% (p = 0.0007). Stratified for degree of resection, survival of patients with complete resections was clearly longer in RPA classes IV and V (17.7 months vs. 12.9 months, p = 0.0015, and 13.7 months vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.0398; 2-year rates: 21.0% vs. 4.4% and 11.1% vs. 2.6%, respectively), but was not in the small subgroup of RPA class III patients (19.3 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.14). Survival of patients from the ALA study is correctly predicted by the RTOG-RPA classes. Differences in survival depending on resection status, especially in RPA classes IV and V, support a causal influence of resection on survival.     

Survival by radiation therapy oncology group recursive partitioning analysis class and treatment modality in patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: In a population of patients with brain metastases from melanoma, the authors sought to determine whether various therapies provided any benefit at all, whether local therapy was better than whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and whether combined local therapy and WBRT provided any advantage over local therapy alone. They also analyzed survival according to a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to determine how well the RTOG RPA classes predicted survival in this patient population and whether treatments varied in effectiveness from category to category. METHODS: A total of 74 patients with brain metastases from melanoma were treated at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation between 1984 and 1998. For this study, the authors reviewed patient charts and confirmed survival status. Survival was compared by treatment modality (surgical resection, WBRT, stereotactic radiosurgery, or WBRT combined with local therapy). Survival also was compared according to the RTOG RPA prognostic classes (Class 1, Class 2, or Class 3), which has not been validated previously in patients with malignant melanoma. RESULTS: The median survival was 5.5 months for all patients. Survival varied significantly by RTOG prognostic class; The median survival was 10.5 months (range, 2.2-99.2 months) for patients in Class 1, 5.9 months (range, 0.2-43.9 months) for patients in Class 2, and 1.8 months (range, 0.1-6.9 months) for patients in Class 3 (P < 0.0001). Survival analysis showed that combined treatment offered significantly better survival (P < 0.0001; combined vs. other). The median survival was 8.8 months (range, 1.8-99.2 months) for the combined therapy group, 4.8 months (range, 1.2-27.8 months) for the local therapy alone group, 2.3 months (range, 0.2-9.6 months) for the WBRT alone group, and 1.1 months (0.1-3.0 months) for the group that received no therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adding WBRT to local therapy may improve survival in this group of patients: Combined therapy was superior to WBRT alone. The RPA classification scheme likely has prognostic value for patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma. Prospective studies are required to overcome selection bias and confirm these results.     

Whole-brain radiotherapy versus stereotactic radiosurgery for patients in recursive partitioning analysis classes 1 and 2 with 1 to 3 brain metastases

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated whether stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone improved outcomes for patients in recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Classes 1 and 2 who had 1 to 3 brain metastases compared with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS: Data regarding 186 patients in RPA Classes 1 and 2 who had 1 to 3 brain metastases and who received either 30 to 40 grays (Gy) of WBRT (n = 91 patients) or 18 to 25 Gy SRS (n = 95 patients) were analyzed retrospectively. Eight other potential prognostic factors were evaluated regarding overall survival (OS), entire brain control (BC), local control (LC) of treated metastases, and brain control distant from treated metastases (distant control [DC]): Those 8 factors were age, sex, performance status, tumor type, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, RPA class, and interval from tumor diagnosis to radiotherapy. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis of OS, age ( risk ratio [RR], 1.51; P = .024), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (RR, 1.98; P = .002), and extracranial metastases (RR, 2.26; P < .001) were significant, whereas the radiation regimen was not significant (P = .89). On multivariate analysis of BC, only the radiation regimen (RR, 1.33; P = .003) was found to be significant. On multivariate analysis of LC, radiation regimen (RR, 1.63; P < .001) and sex (RR, 1.62; P = .022) were significant. On multivariate analysis of DC, KPS (RR, 1.85; P = .049) and extracranial metastases (RR, 1.69; P = .047) were significant. The radiation regimen was not found to be significant even on univariate analysis (P = .80). In RPA class subgroup analyses, BC and LC were better after SRS than WBRT for patients in RPA Classes 1 and 2, whereas OS and DC did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: For patients in RPA Classes 1 and 2 who had 1 to 3 brain metastases, SRS alone was associated with improved BC and LC compared with 30 to 40 Gy WBRT, whereas OS and DC were not significantly different. Similar results were observed in separate subgroup analyses of patients in RPA Class 1 and RPA Class 2.     

Application of recursive partitioning analysis and evaluation of the use of whole brain radiation among patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed brain metastases

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) for brain metastases among patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 135 patients who underwent linear accelerator (Linac) (n = 73) or Gamma Knife (n = 62) SRS for newly diagnosed brain metastases at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between 8/89 and 12/98. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of age, primary site, control of the primary, interval to development of brain metastases (disease-free interval [DFI]), number of brain metastases, presence of extracranial metastases, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), treatment of brain metastases, and RPA class on overall survival. RESULTS: Application of the RPA classification revealed 29 patients fit the criteria for class I, 96 for class II, and 10 for class III. All of the patients underwent SRS. Fifty-seven patients also received WBRT at the time of initial presentation (SRS and immediate WBRT), and 78 patients received WBRT only if CNS relapse occurred (SRS alone). The median survival for all patients was 7.9 months (range: 1.1-90.1), and was 11.2 months for RPA class I compared to 6. 9 months for RPA classes II-III (p = 0.016). Median survival was 10. 5 months following SRS alone compared to 6.4 months following SRS and WBRT (p = 0.07). On univariate analysis, KPS >/= 80% (p = 0.002) and absence of systemic disease (p = 0.013) were also associated with longer survival, whereas control of the primary, DFI, and number of brain metastases did not have an impact. Multivariate analysis revealed only RPA class (p = 0.023) to be an independent predictor for overall survival, whereas treatment group (p = 0.079) was only marginally significant. At 2 years, immediate WBRT improved control at the original site of metastases (80% vs. 52%, p = 0.03) and prevention of new metastatic sites within the brain, 74% vs. 48% (p = 0.06). The 2-year intracranial disease-free survival was 60% following SRS and WBRT compared to only 34% following SRS alone (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the inherent biases to select more favorable patients for SRS, the RPA class retains its prognostic value. Omission of WBRT from the initial management was not detrimental in terms of overall survival; however, progressive disease occurred in over 50% of patients treated in this manner. Further studies are required to determine which, if any, patients should be considered for SRS with WBRT held in reserve.     

Results of the whole-brain radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases from lung cancer: the RTOG RPA intra-classes analysis

We evaluated the overall survival with respect to prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases (BM) from lung cancer in order to assess the RTOG RPA (Recursive Partitioning Analysis) classification value and to perform intra-classes analyses including pretreatment and treatment-related variables. Between 1986 and 1997, 322 consecutive patients with BM from lung cancer were treated with whole-brain radiotherapy. Patients' distribution according to the RTOG RPA classes was: Class 1--13%, Class 2--67% and Class 3--20%. Prognostic value of the following variables was tested: RTOG RPA classes, performance status, age, extracranial metastases, control of the primary tumour, gender, histology, number of BM and interval from diagnosis to the development of BM. Intra-classes analyses were performed including radiation dose and surgery of BM. Median survival was 4.0 months. Median survival for RTOG RPA classes 1, 2 and 3 were 5.2, 4.0 and 2.5 months, respectively (p = 0.003). Extracranial metastases, performance status, control of the primary and RTOG RPA classes were prognostic for survival. Within class 2 higher radiation dose, female, no extracranial metastases and surgery of BM were related to the improved survival. RTOG RPA classes maintain their prognostic significance for patients with BM from lung cancer not participating in clinical trials.     

Radiosurgery for brain metastases: the Tuebingen experience.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively investigate the effectiveness of linear accelerator based radiosurgery (RS) in the treatment of brain metastases (BM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of 55 patients with a total of 72 BM, 41 patients had a single brain metastasis and 14 patients had two or three metastases. Median tumour dose of 15Gy (range 8-20Gy) was prescribed to a median isodose surface of 90% (range 70-100%) encompassing the target volume. RESULTS: The median survival time (MST) for all 55 patients was 7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5-10 months] and 2-year survival is 18%. There was no significant difference between patients who had one brain metastasis and those with either two or three metastases (log rank P=0.7565). Multivariate analysis in patients with a single BM showed that interval between primary diagnosis (PD) to BM, maximum size of metastasis, and histology (renal cell carcinoma and melanoma versus others) were independent prognostic factors influencing survival. Local control was obtained in 66/72 (92%) metastases. Actuarial local control at 24 months was 52%. Only age (50 years) and histology (renal cell versus others) influenced local control in the univariate analysis in patients with a single BM. In multivariate analysis, size, histology (renal cell and melanoma versus others), activity of extracranial metastatic disease, age, interval from PD to BM and location (midline versus other) independently influenced local control, while the dose was not significant for our patient group. Only one patient developed radiographically suspected RS-induced necrosis after previous whole brain RT. CONCLUSION: RS was effective and little toxic in BM. Identification of prognostic factors must be performed to gain knowledge on patients most likely to benefit from this procedure.     

Radiosurgery for brain metastases: a score index for predicting prognosis

Purpose: To analyze a prognostic score index for patients with brain metastases submitted to stereotactic radiosurgery (the Score Index for Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases [SIR]).

Methods and Materials: Actuarial survival of 65 brain metastases patients treated with radiosurgery between July 1993 and December 1997 was retrospectively analyzed. Prognostic factors included age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), extracranial disease status, number of brain lesions, largest brain lesion volume, lesions site, and receiving or not whole brain irradiation. The SIR was obtained through summation of the previously noted first five prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival curves for all prognostic factors, SIR, and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) (RTOG prognostic score) were calculated. Survival curves of subsets were compared by log-rank test. Application of the Cox model was utilized to identify any correlation between prognostic factors, prognostic scores, and survival.

Results: Median overall survival from radiosurgery was 6.8 months. Utilizing univariate analysis, extracranial disease status, KPS, number of brain lesions, largest brain lesion volume, RPA, and SIR were significantly correlated with prognosis. Median survival for the RPA classes 1, 2, and 3 was 20.19 months, 7.75 months, and 3.38 months respectively (p = 0.0131). Median survival for patients, grouped under SIR from 1 to 3, 4 to 7, and 8 to 10, was 2.91 months, 7.00 months, and 31.38 months respectively (p = 0.0001). Using the Cox model, extracranial disease status and KPS demonstrated significant correlation with prognosis (p = 0.0001 and 0.0004 respectively). Multivariate analysis also demonstrated significance for SIR and RPA when tested individually (p = 0.0001 and 0.0040 respectively). Applying the Cox Model to both SIR and RPA, only SIR reached independent significance (p = 0.0004).

Conclusions: Systemic disease status, KPS, SIR, and RPA are reliable prognostic factors for patients with brain metastases submitted to radiosurgery. Applying SIR and RPA classifications to our patients’ data, SIR demonstrated better accuracy in predicting prognosis. SIR should be further tested with larger patient accrual and for all patients with brain metastases subjected or not to stereotactic radiosurgery.     

Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis

Survival for patients with glioblastoma multiforme is short, and current treatments provide limited benefit. Therefore, there is interest in conducting phase 2 trials of experimental treatments in newly diagnosed patients. However, this requires historical data with which to compare the experimental therapies. Knowledge of prognostic markers would also allow stratification into risk groups for phase 3 randomized trials. In this retrospective study of 832 glioblastoma multiforme patients enrolled into prospective clinical trials at the time of initial diagnosis, we evaluated several potential prognostic markers for survival to establish risk groups. Analyses were done using both Cox proportional hazards modeling and recursive partitioning analyses. Initially, patients from 8 clinical trials, 6 of which included adjuvant chemotherapy, were included. Subsequent analyses excluded trials with interstitial brachytherapy, and finally included only nonbrachytherapy trials with planned adjuvant chemotherapy. The initial analysis defined 4 risk groups. The 2 lower risk groups included patients under the age of 40, the lowest risk group being young patients with tumor in the frontal lobe only. An intermediate-risk group included patients with Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >70, subtotal or total resection, and age between 40 and 65. The highest risk group included all patients over 65 and patients between 40 and 65 with either KPS<80 or biopsy only. Subgroup analyses indicated that inclusion of adjuvant chemotherapy provides an increase in survival, although that improvement tends to be minimal for patients over age 65, for patients over age 40 with KPS less than 80, and for those treated with brachytherapy.