Methylprednisolone intravenously 1 day after surgery has sustained analgesic and opioid-sparing effects

BACKGROUND: In previous studies on glucocorticoids for postoperative pain, the test drug has been given perioperatively, usually before measurement of baseline pain. In order to evaluate the time course and magnitude of the analgesic effect of a glucocorticoid in well-established postoperative pain, we compared methylprednisolone with ketorolac and placebo, after assessment of baseline pain on the first postoperative day. METHODS: This was a double-blind, single dose, randomized, parallel comparison of intravenous (i.v.) methylprednisolone 125 mg, ketorolac 30 mg as an active control, and placebo in 75 patients with moderate to severe pain 1 day after orthopaedic surgery. Outcome variables were pain intensity (0-100 VAS), pain relief (0-4 PAR) and rescue opioid consumption. RESULTS: Methylprednisolone was not significantly different from ketorolac and gave significantly lower pain intensity from 1 h (0-6 h, P < 0.02), and more pain relief 2-6 h after test drugs (P < 0.05) compared with placebo. After 24 h, pain intensity was lower in both active drug groups compared with placebo (methylprednisolone, P < 0.0001; ketorolac, P < 0.007). Number needed to treat (NNT) calculated from patients having more than at least 50% of maximum obtainable total pain relief during the first 6 h (>50%maxTOTPAR(6 h)) was 3.6 for methylprednisolone and 3.1 for ketorolac. Number needed to treat calculated from the percentage reporting at least 50% pain relief for at least 4 h (>50%PAR(4 h)) was 2.8 for both groups. Opioid consumption was significantly reduced for 72 h after methylprednisolone compared with ketorolac (P < 0.02) and placebo (P < 0.003). CONCLUSION: Methylprednisolone 125 mg i.v. 1 day after surgery gave similar early reduction of pain as i.v. ketorolac 30 mg. Less pain than placebo 24 h after methylprednisolone, and lower opioid consumption for 72 h compared with ketorolac and placebo indicate sustained analgesic effects of methylprednisolone.     

Analgesic effects of dexamethasone in burn injury

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Glucocorticoids are well-known adjuvant analgesics in certain chronic pain states. There is, however, a paucity of data on their analgesic efficacy in acute pain. Therefore, the aim of the study was to examine the analgesic effects of dexamethasone in a validated burn model of acute inflammatory pain in humans. METHODS: Twenty-two volunteers were investigated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Intravenous dexamethasone 8 mg or placebo was administered on 2 separate study days. Two hours after drug administration, a first-degree burn injury was produced on the medial aspect of the nondominant calf (12.5 cm2, 47 degrees C for 7 minutes). Quantitative sensory testing included pain ratings to thermal and mechanical stimuli (visual analog scale [VAS]), assessments of thermal and mechanical detection thresholds, and areas of allodynia and secondary hyperalgesia. RESULTS: The burn injury induced significant increases in erythema (P <.0001) and hyperalgesia (P <.001) in both groups. Pain ratings and development of tactile allodynia during the burn did not differ between dexamethasone and placebo treatments (P >.6). There were no significant differences between treatments in regard to skin erythema (P >.8), thermal or mechanical thresholds (P >.2), thermal or mechanical pain response (P >.2), or mechanical secondary hyperalgesia (P >.2). Dexamethasone had no analgesic effects in normal skin. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that systemic administration of dexamethasone 2 hours before a burn injury does not reduce the inflammatory-mediated changes in quantitative sensory thresholds, pain perception, or skin erythema in humans.     

Effects of gabapentin in acute inflammatory pain in humans

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine the analgesic effects of the anticonvulsant, gabapentin, in a validated model of acute inflammatory pain. METHODS: Twenty-two volunteers were investigated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Gabapentin 1,200 mg or placebo was given on 2 separate study days. Three hours after drug administration, a first-degree burn injury was produced on the medial aspect of the nondominant calf (12.5 cm(2), 47 degrees C for 7 minutes). Quantitative sensory testing (QST) included pain ratings to thermal and mechanical stimuli (visual analog scale [VAS]), assessments of thermal and mechanical detection thresholds, and areas of secondary hyperalgesia. Side effects drowsiness and postural instability were assessed by subjective ratings (VAS). RESULTS: The burn injury induced significant primary and secondary hyperalgesia (P <.0001). Gabapentin diminished the decrease in mechanical pain threshold in the burn area (P =.04) and reduced secondary hyperalgesia, but the reduction was not significant (P =.06). Heat pain thresholds, pain during the burn, and mechanical pain in the area of secondary hyperalgesia were not significantly changed by gabapentin (P <.2). Ratings of drowsiness and unsteadiness during walking were significantly higher for gabapentin than for placebo (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that gabapentin has no analgesic effect in normal skin, but may reduce primary mechanical allodynia in acute inflammation following a thermal injury. These observations suggest a clinical potential of gabapentin in the treatment of postoperative pain.     

The effect of intravenous ketorolac on capsaicin-induced deep tissue hyperalgesia

Preclinical and clinical studies have emphasized that persistent small afferent input will induce a state of central facilitation that can be attenuated by systemically administered nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. However, these studies have been performed using cutaneous models of hyperalgesia. In this study we evaluated the effects of IV ketorolac on an experimental model of deep tissue hyperalgesia using IM capsaicin. We used a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. Ten subjects received 60 mg of ketorolac or placebo in 2 sessions separated by 1 wk. Capsaicin (100 microg in 10 microL) was then injected into the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle of the left forearm. After injection, spontaneous pain scores, pressure pain scores, gripping pain, pain distribution, and pain quality were recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 min. Cutaneous allodynia and dysesthesia were then mapped and thermal and mechanical thresholds were measured. The IM injection of capsaicin resulted in a reliable report of pain, hyperalgesia, and referred pain. Ketorolac had no effect on spontaneous pain, elicited pain, pain distribution, or secondary hyperalgesia induced by capsaicin. The findings of this study support the feasibility of further pharmacological studies using the IM capsaicin pain model.     

Reduction of Postburn Hyperalgesia after Local Injection of Ketorolac in Healthy Volunteers

Background: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may be particularly effective against prostaglandin-mediated, postinjury hyperalgesia and related inflammatory pain. However, their usefulness may be limited by their systemic side effects. The current study determined if local effectiveness can be achieved by low-dose intradermal nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug administration.

Methods: Ten healthy volunteers were asked to make magnitude estimations of the pain induced by a contact thermal stimulator at 1 degree C increments between 43 and 51 degrees C at three 1 x 1 cm study sites on each forearm during three study phases: (1) baseline; (2) after pretreatment with 10 micro liter 0.9% saline (n = 1 site on each forearm), 0.3 mg ketorolac (n = 1 on each forearm), or nothing (n = 1 on each forearm); and (3) after "injury" by a mild burn at the ketorolac- and saline-treated sites on one arm or by injection of 10 nmol bradykinin at all three sites on the other arm. The effects of pretreatment on the pain induced by thermal testing were assessed using repeated-measures analysis of variance.

Results: Pretreatment with ketorolac had a selective effect on the postburn injury hyperalgesia, reducing the increase in pain intensity (P < 0.05) but not the decline in pain threshold. It had no effect on the responses to thermal stimuli before injury or on the pain of burning, which were similar at ketorolac- and saline-treated sites. The effect of pretreatment with ketorolac on bradykinin-induced hyperalgesia could not be tested because hyperalgesia was not achieved after bradykinin injection at sites pretreated with saline as well as ketorolac.     

Topical ketorolac has no antinociceptive or anti-inflammatory effect in thermal injury

This study investigated the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effect of a topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug in human thermal injury. Twelve healthy unmedicated volunteers had identical burn injuries produced on the medial side of both calves with a 49°C 15 × 25 mm thermode. Ketorolac gel or placebo were randomly applied on the right or left calf 1.5 h before burn injury, immediately after burn injury and 6 and 12 h later in a double-blind trial where every subject served as his own control. Heat pain detection thresholds (HPDT), head pain tolerance (HPT), mechanical pain detection thresholds (MPDT) and the intensity of burn-induced erythema (erythema index, EI) were assessed in the area of the thermal injury, and areas of hyperalgesia to pin prick were determined outside the injury before and 3, 6 and 24 h after the burn injury. Burn injury led to a decrease in HPDT, HPT and MPDT, an increase in EI and development of mechanical hyperalgesia (P < 0.05). Ketorolac gel had no effect on any of the nociceptive or inflammatory variables studies (P > 0.2).     

Effect of naloxone on primary and secondary hyperalgesia induced by the human burn injury model

BACKGROUND: Opioid antagonists may change the responses in models of experimental hyperalgesia. This indicates a possible involvement of the endogenous opioid system in these models. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether activation of the endogenous opioid system could be demonstrated in the human burn injury model of cutaneous hyperalgesia, using an intravenous challenge with the non-selective opioid antagonist naloxone. METHODS: We studied 25 healthy male volunteers aged 20-31 yrs in a randomised, double-blind, triple crossover design. A 25x50 mm rectangular burn injury was produced on the calf on 3 separate days, at least 1 week apart. Subjects received an intravenous bolus dose of naloxone 0.4 mg, 10 mg or placebo 3 h after induction of the burn injury. RESULTS: Primary and secondary hyperalgesia was induced by the burn injury. Naloxone did not affect any of the measured variables: heat pain detection threshold in non-injured or injured tissue, pain produced by short or prolonged noxious heat in non-injured or injured tissue, secondary hyperalgesia elicited by pin prick or stroke, or pain produced by short or prolonged noxious mechanical stimulation in non-injured tissue. No significant adverse effects of naloxone were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Activation of an endogenous opioid response following induction of hyperalgesia in human volunteers by a burn injury could not be demonstrated with an intravenous naloxone challenge. These findings suggest that the endogenous opioid response is not a confounding factor in this model.     

Quantitative sensory testing and human surgery: effects of analgesic management on postoperative neuroplasticity

BACKGROUND: Altered central nervous system sensory processing (neuroplasticity) is a basic mechanism underlying postoperative pain that can be made visible using quantitative sensory testing. Using quantitative sensory testing, the authors investigated how perioperative analgesia affects postoperative neuroplasticity and how this relates to clinical pain measures. METHODS: Patients undergoing back surgery received placebo, fentanyl, or ketorolac (n = 15 per group) before isoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Preoperatively to 5 days postoperatively, we measured thresholds to electrical skin stimulation at the incision site, arm, and leg; pain scores; and morphine patient-controlled analgesia consumption. RESULTS: Decreased pain thresholds versus preoperatively were seen 5 days postoperatively, with decreases greater for ketorolac (-63%; P = 0.00005 vs. preoperatively) than placebo (-45%; P = 0.008 vs. preoperatively) but nonsignificant for fentanyl (-36%; P = 0.9 vs. preoperatively). Mainly nonnociceptive thresholds were increased up to 24 h postoperatively. Postoperative clinical pain measures were similar across drug groups. Postoperative pain tolerance threshold changes did not correlate with preoperative clinical pain measures but were inversely related to preoperative thresholds for placebo and ketorolac but not fentanyl. CONCLUSIONS: Without analgesia, neuroplasticity after surgery was inhibitory the first 24 h and followed at 5 days by excitation. Fentanyl efficiently preempted this hyperalgesia, but hyperalgesia was greater with ketorolac than with placebo. Clinical pain measures neither reflected the different effects of ketorolac and fentanyl on postoperative neuroplasticity nor permitted prediction of postoperative neuroplasticity. The information obtained by perioperative quantitative sensory testing is separate from and additional to that from clinical pain measures and may enable more mechanism-based approaches to surgical analgesia management in the future.     

Lack of secondary hyperalgesia and central sensitization in an acute sheep model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the following in an experimental acute pain model in sheep: (1) whether multimodal analgesia with intravenous fentanyl and ketorolac was more effective than fentanyl alone; (2) whether secondary hyperalgesia (central sensitization) occurred in adjacent (foreleg) dermatomes after thoracic surgery; (3) whether ketorolac used preemptively influenced the development of secondary hyperalgesia after surgery. METHODS: Changes in primary nociception were measured by increases to tolerated pressure, applied to the foreleg by a blunt pin, before foreleg withdrawal occurred. Changes to breath-to-breath interval and estimated end-tidal CO2 were used as indices of respiratory effects. Study 1 (n = 6) compared the paired responses to acute nociception after ketorolac (90 mg) or saline (control) pretreatment, followed by fentanyl (graded, 0 mg to 1.5 mg). Study 2 (n = 6) used a cross-over of ketorolac (90 mg) or saline (control) 24 hours and 1 hour, respectively, before a standardized thoracotomy incision, followed by antinociceptive testing with ketorolac (90 mg) and fentanyl (0.6 mg) daily over 4 days. RESULTS: In study 1, fentanyl produced naloxone-antagonizable antinociception and respiratory depression. Ketorolac did not affect fentanyl antinociception, except for prolonging antinociception at the highest dose; it did not affect the respiratory effects. In study 2, preemptive ketorolac had no effect on the postoperative antinociceptive or respiratory effects of fentanyl. The pharmacokinetics of fentanyl were unaltered by ketorolac. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this acute pain model found no significant evidence of a fentanyl-ketorolac interaction, of central sensitization as shown by secondary hyperalgesia, or of a preemptive analgesic effect.     

Peripheral Analgesic Effects of Ketamine in Acute Inflammatory Pain

Background: This study examined the analgesic effect of local ketamine infiltration, compared with placebo and systemic ketamine, in a human model of inflammatory pain.

Methods: Inflammatory pain was induced by a burn (at 47 [degree sign]C for 7 min; wound size, 2.5 x 5 cm) on the calf in 15 volunteers on 3 separate days with 7-day intervals. They received either (1) subcutaneous infiltration with ketamine in the burn area (local treatment) and contralateral placebo injections, or (2) subcutaneous ketamine contralateral to the burn (systemic treatment) and placebo in the burn area, or (3) placebo on both sides. The study was double-blinded and the order of the treatments was randomized. Hyperalgesia to mechanical and heat stimuli was examined by von Frey hairs and contact thermodes (3.75 and 12.5 cm2), and pain was rated using a visual analog scale (0-100).

Results: The burns produced significant hyperalgesia. Local ketamine infiltration reduced pain during the burn injury compared with systemic treatment and placebo (P 相似文献   

Prospective double-blind study of effect of ketorolac administration after laparoscopic urologic surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To decrease postoperative dependence on narcotics for analgesia, we have evaluated ketorolac as an adjunct to perioperative pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic urologic surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients (34 male, 31 female) were randomized to receive either ketorolac tromethamine (15-30 mg IV q 6 h) or placebo prior to laparoscopic surgery. Patient-controlled analgesia in the form of morphine sulfate was provided. Operative factors such as the type of surgery, operative time, and estimated blood loss were recorded. Postoperative factors such as analog pain score (range 0-10), narcotic usage, and length of stay were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients completed the study. The average pain score was 2.2 and 4.5 for the ketorolac and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.005). The mean amounts of total morphine used were 39.2 mg (ketorolac) and 62.5 mg (placebo) (P = 0.077). The length of stay was not significantly different in the ketorolac (2.5 days) and placebo (2.6 days) groups (P = 0.74). Operative times (P = 0.21) and estimated blood loss (P = 0.60) were not significantly different in the two groups. Ketorolac did not adversely affect renal function; serum creatinine changes were not significantly different from those in the patients receiving placebo (P = 0.50). Laparoscopic pyeloplasty necessitated more narcotic analgesia than did other laparoscopic procedures (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ketorolac decreases the subjective perception of pain after laparoscopic urologic surgery. It is suggested that ketorolac administration decreases the amount of narcotic usage as well. Time to resumption of oral intake and length of hospital stay were not influenced by use of ketorolac.     

Adenosine reduces secondary hyperalgesia in two human models of cutaneous inflammatory pain

Secondary hyperalgesia is characterized by increased sensitivity to noxious mechanical stimuli in the area surrounding injured skin. The pathophysiological mechanisms involve increased excitability of second-order neurons located in the spinal cord, i.e., central sensitization. The mechanisms behind this phenomenon may be of importance in clinical pain, including neuropathic pain. To study the effects of systemic infusion of the endogenous compound adenosine (ADO) on sensory function, a superficial cutaneous burn injury was induced by the 4-min topical application of mustard oil or by heat (47 degrees C for 7 min) during i.v. ADO infusion (60 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Healthy human subjects (n = 10 for each model) were tested, using a blinded, placebo-controlled procedure. The area of secondary hyperalgesia, as well as tactile and thermal sensory function, was tested using psychophysical methods during and after treatments. ADO significantly reduced the area of secondary hyperalgesia in both models. The maximal reduction compared with placebo was 58% +/- 20% (heat burn) and 39% +/- 13% (mustard oil burn). No other differences in sensory function were observed. The results are interpreted as an ADO-induced modulatory effect on the mechanisms of central sensitization. IMPLICATIONS: We tested the effects of adenosine on the development of increased sensitivity in the skin surrounding a superficial skin injury in humans. A superficial skin bum was induced with a chemical irritant or heat. The results show that adenosine reduces the skin area with increased sensitivity surrounding the injury.     

Arthroscopic knee surgery does not modify hyperalgesic responses to heat injury

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that surgical injury may up- or down-regulate nociceptive function. Therefore, the aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the effect of elective arthroscopically assisted knee surgery on nociceptive responses to a heat injury. METHODS: Seventeen patients scheduled to undergo repair of the anterior cruciate ligament and 16 healthy controls were studied. The first burn injury was induced 6 days before surgery, and the second burn was induced 1 day after surgery with a contact thermode (12.5 cm2, 47 degrees C for 7 min) placed on the medial aspect of the calf contralateral to the surgical side. Ibuprofen and acetaminophen were given for 2 days before the first burn injury and again from the time of surgery. In the controls, the two burn injuries were separated by 7 days. Sensory variables included cumulated pain score during induction of the burn (visual analog scale), secondary hyperalgesia area, and mechanical and thermal pain perception and pain thresholds assessed before and 1 h after the burn injury. RESULTS: The heat injuries induced significant increases in pain perception (P < 0.001) and decreases in pain thresholds (P < 0.02). Baseline heat pain thresholds were higher during the second burn injury in patients (P < 0.001) and controls (P < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in pain to heat injury (P > 0.8), secondary hyperalgesia areas (P > 0.1), mechanical and thermal pain perception (P > 0.1), or mechanical and thermal pain thresholds (P > 0.08) in the burn area before surgery compared to after surgery. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic knee surgery did not modify nociceptive responses to a contralaterally applied experimental burn injury.     

Arthroscopic Knee Surgery Does Not Modify Hyperalgesic Responses to Heat Injury

Background: Experimental studies suggest that surgical injury may up- or down-regulate nociceptive function. Therefore, the aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the effect of elective arthroscopically assisted knee surgery on nociceptive responses to a heat injury.

Methods: Seventeen patients scheduled to undergo repair of the anterior cruciate ligament and 16 healthy controls were studied. The first burn injury was induced 6 days before surgery, and the second burn was induced 1 day after surgery with a contact thermode (12.5 cm2, 47[degrees]C for 7 min) placed on the medial aspect of the calf contralateral to the surgical side. Ibuprofen and acetaminophen were given for 2 days before the first burn injury and again from the time of surgery. In the controls, the two burn injuries were separated by 7 days. Sensory variables included cumulated pain score during induction of the burn (visual analog scale), secondary hyperalgesia area, and mechanical and thermal pain perception and pain thresholds assessed before and 1 h after the burn injury.

Results: The heat injuries induced significant increases in pain perception (P < 0.001) and decreases in pain thresholds (P < 0.02). Baseline heat pain thresholds were higher during the second burn injury in patients (P < 0.001) and controls (P < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in pain to heat injury (P > 0.8), secondary hyperalgesia areas (P > 0.1), mechanical and thermal pain perception (P > 0.1), or mechanical and thermal pain thresholds (P > 0.08) in the burn area before surgery compared to after surgery.     

Topical glucocorticoid has no antinociceptive or anti-inflammatory effect in thermal injury

We have studied the antinociceptive and antiinflammatory effectsof topical glucocorticoids in human thermal injury. The rightand left legs of 12 healthy volunteers were allocated randomlyto be treated with either 0.05% clobetasol propionate creamor placebo in a double-blind trial. Thermal injuries were inducedwith a thermode, which was heated to 49 °C for 5 min understandardized pressure. Clobetasol propionate or placebo creamwas applied to the skin 1 h before burn injury, immediatelyafter the injury and every 12 h for the next 3 days. Heat paindetection thresholds (HPDT), heat pain tolerance (HPT), mechanicalpain detection thresholds (MPDT) and the intensity of burn-inducederythema (erythema index, EI) were assessed inside the thermalinjury and areas of hyperalgesia to pinprick outside the injurywere determined before and regularly for 72 h after the burninjury. Burn injury caused a decrease in HPDT, HPT and MPDT,an increase in EI and development of mechanical, secondary hyperalgesia.Clobetasol propionate had no effect on any of the nociceptiveor inflammatory variables studied. (Br. J. Anaesth. 1994; 72:379–382)     

A double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of a novel formulation of intravenous diclofenac and ketorolac for postoperative third molar extraction pain

Dyloject is a novel formulation of diclofenac intended for intravenous (IV) administration. This formulation employs the solubilizing agent hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin to permit bolus IV administration. The efficacy and safety of 5 dose levels of IV diclofenac were compared with IV ketorolac and placebo following third molar extraction. This was a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and comparator-controlled, parallel-group study. A total of 353 subjects with moderate to severe pain received placebo; ketorolac 30 mg; or IV diclofenac 3.75, 9.4, 18.75, 37.5, or 75 mg (N = 51 for all groups, except N = 47 for ketorolac). The primary endpoint was total pain relief over 6 hours (TOTPAR6) as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included multiple measures of pain intensity and relief; patient global evaluation; and times to pain relief and rescue medication. Dropouts and adverse effects (AEs) were also monitored. IV diclofenac was superior to placebo as measured by TOTPAR6 (P < .0001 for all doses except 3.75 mg, for which P = .0341). IV diclofenac 3.75 mg was statistically superior to placebo for TOTPAR2 and TOTPAR4. IV diclofenac at both 37.5 and 75 mg was superior to placebo (P < .05) at the earliest (5 minute) assessments of pain intensity and pain relief, but ketorolac was not. The proportion of patients reporting 30% or greater pain relief at 5 minutes was significantly greater after IV diclofenac 37.5 and 75 mg than after ketorolac 30 mg or placebo. Secondary endpoints confirmed the primary findings. Treatment-related AEs were generally mild to moderate and were typical for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The more rapid onset of action of IV diclofenac compared with the reference injectable NSAID ketorolac suggests additional clinical benefit. If confirmed in larger series, these findings may improve the safety and efficacy of postoperative NSAID analgesia.     

Effect of oral ketamine on secondary hyperalgesia, thermal and mechanical pain thresholds, and sedation in humans

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, and has been proven effective in alleviating secondary hyperalgesia in human subjects when injected intravenously. After oral ingestion, ketamine is metabolized into norketamine, which in vitro possesses NMDA receptor antagonistic effect. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of oral administration of ketamine on secondary hyperalgesia evoked by standardized tissue injury. METHODS: Twenty-four male volunteers were included in the study. Each volunteer received the following treatment regimen, in randomized, double-blind, 3-way cross-over fashion: (A) placebo; (B) ketamine, 0.5 mg/kg; and (C) ketamine, 1.0 mg/kg. Standardized tissue injury was induced after study medication by heating the right calf with a rectangular thermode. The temperature was 47 degrees C, and heating time was 7 minutes. The following parameters were investigated: Pain during induction of the burn injury; heat-pain detection thresholds in the injured area and a corresponding noninjured area; secondary hyperalgesia surrounding the injured area on the calf; secondary hyperalgesia induced by heating an area on the thigh with 45 degrees C in 3 minutes; pressure-pain detection thresholds measured on the middle phalanx of the 4th left finger; pain during a 60-second thermal stimulation of 46 degrees C on undamaged skin on the left thigh; and side effects. RESULTS: Some degree of sedation was observed after oral administration of ketamine. No effects on any of the other investigated parameters were observed. CONCLUSION: Oral ketamine 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg has no effect on secondary hyperalgesia or thermal or mechanical pain thresholds in human volunteers.     

Mechanisms of Postoperative Pain: Clinical Indications for a Contribution of Central Neuronal Sensitization

Background: The relative importance of different nociceptive mechanisms for the intensity, duration, and character of postoperative pain is not well established. It has been suggested that sensitization of dorsal horn neurones may contribute to pain in the postoperative period. We hypothesized that wound hyperalgesia in postoperative patients and experimentally heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia share a common mechanism, sensitization of central neurones, and consequently, that the short-acting opioid remifentanil would have comparable effects on hyperalgesia in both conditions.

Methods: In a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, we assessed mechanical hyperalgesia in skin bordering the surgical wound, and an area of experimentally heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia on the thigh, in 12 patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy within 5 days prior to the investigation. Observations were made before and during a drug challenge with remifentanil, which has been demonstrated to reduce the area of heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia in volunteers.

Results: The area of skin with surgically-induced mechanical hyperalgesia, the area of heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia, and pain during cough, were significantly reduced during remifentanil infusion compared with placebo (P = 0.008, P = 0.006, and P = 0.002, respectively). The relative reduction (% of baseline) of the area of skin with surgically-induced hyperalgesia and heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia during infusion of remifentanil was significantly associated (R2 = 0.72, P = 0.001).     

The effects of remifentanil and gabapentin on hyperalgesia in a new extended inflammatory skin pain model in healthy volunteers

We tested the responsiveness of measures of hyperalgesia in a model of UVB-induced inflammatory hyperalgesia with remifentanil, gabapentin, and the combination of both drugs in a double-blinded, active placebo-controlled, 4-way-crossover design in 16 volunteers. A circular skin area was irradiated with UVB-light 20 h before the application of gabapentin (600 mg) and 2 h later remifentanil (0.08 microg.kg(-1).min(-1), 40 min). In the sunburn spots we observed stable decreases of the heat pain perception thresholds (HPPT, mean difference, 4.45 degrees C; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.32 degrees -5.59 degrees ) and heat pain tolerance thresholds (HPTT; mean difference, 5.43 degrees C; 95% CI, 4.50 degrees -6.35 degrees ) compared with normal skin. Further, large areas of mechanical hyperalgesia to pinprick adjacent to the erythema spots developed in all subjects. Overall remifentanil increased the HPPT (mean increase, 2.47 degrees C; 95% CI, 1.86 degrees -3.09 degrees, P < 0.001) and HPTT (mean increase, 3.18 degrees C; 95% CI, 2.65 degrees -3.71 degrees, P < 0.001) and reduced the area of secondary hyperalgesia by 59% (mean decrease, 5326 mm(2); 95% CI, 4233-6419 mm(2), P < 0.001) compared with placebo. In the sunburn remifentanil markedly increased the HPTT by 86% compared with normal skin (additional increase, 2.57 degrees C; 95% CI, 1.71 degrees -3.43 degrees). This different effect was not seen in the HPPT. With the exception of a small increase of HPTT in the sunburn (P = 0.02) gabapentin had no noticeable effect on either hyperalgesia. In conclusion, opioid analgesia was reliably demonstrated in this new extended pain model. IMPLICATIONS: Opioid analgesia was reliably demonstrated in a new inflammatory model of primary and secondary hyperalgesia. Gabapentin showed no antihyperalgesic and no opioid-enhancing effect in this model.     

Mechanisms of postoperative pain: clinical indications for a contribution of central neuronal sensitization

BACKGROUND: The relative importance of different nociceptive mechanisms for the intensity, duration, and character of postoperative pain is not well established. It has been suggested that sensitization of dorsal horn neurones may contribute to pain in the postoperative period. We hypothesized that wound hyperalgesia in postoperative patients and experimentally heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia share a common mechanism, sensitization of central neurones, and consequently, that the short-acting opioid remifentanil would have comparable effects on hyperalgesia in both conditions. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, we assessed mechanical hyperalgesia in skin bordering the surgical wound, and an area of experimentally heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia on the thigh, in 12 patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy within 5 days prior to the investigation. Observations were made before and during a drug challenge with remifentanil, which has been demonstrated to reduce the area of heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia in volunteers. RESULTS: The area of skin with surgically-induced mechanical hyperalgesia, the area of heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia, and pain during cough, were significantly reduced during remifentanil infusion compared with placebo (P = 0.008, P = 0.006, and P = 0.002, respectively). The relative reduction (% of baseline) of the area of skin with surgically-induced hyperalgesia and heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia during infusion of remifentanil was significantly associated (R2 = 0.72, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although remifentanil is not a highly targeted "antihyperalgesic," these results support the hypothesis that both wound hyperalgesia in postoperative patients and experimentally heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia may share common mechanisms, and that central neuronal sensitization may contribute to some aspects of postoperative pain. Antihyperalgesic drugs should be further developed and evaluated in clinical trials of postoperative pain.