Randomized multicenter phase II trial of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan versus raltitrexed as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are two new agents with promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Based on preclinical and clinical evidence that both drugs act synergistically, a randomized phase II study was initiated to investigate the therapeutic potential and tolerance of this combination in the front-line setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-two patients with previously untreated, measurable disease were randomized to receive biweekly oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 175 mg/m(2) or raltitrexed 3 mg/m(2) given on day 1 every 3 weeks. Upon development of progressive disease, second-line treatment with the opposite arm was effected. RESULTS: Patients allocated to oxaliplatin/irinotecan had a significantly better radiologically confirmed response rate (43.5% v 19.6%; P =.0025) and longer progression-free survival (median, 7.1 v 5.0 months; P =.0033). Improvement in overall survival, however, did not reach the level of significance (median, 16.0 v 16.5 months; P =.3943). The response rate after cross-over was 33.3% (eight of 24) for assessable patients treated with oxaliplatin/irinotecan compared with 14.2% (three of 21) for those treated with second-line raltitrexed. Oxaliplatin/irinotecan caused more hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities, necessitating dose reductions in 10 of the first 20 patients. After adjustment of the irinotecan starting dose from 175 to 150 mg/m(2), tolerance of treatment was acceptable; the most commonly encountered events (all grades) were neutropenia (81%), alopecia (65%), nausea/emesis (62%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (62%), and diarrhea (46%). CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin/irinotecan seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, with an acceptable toxicity profile at the reduced irinotecan dose level. Its promising therapeutic potential is supported by the high response activity noted in the raltitrexed control arm after cross-over, which may also explain the lack of a difference in overall survival.     

Triplet combination with irinotecan plus oxaliplatin plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) plus fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (de Gramont regimen) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with MCC who had not received prior therapy for metastatic disease were enrolled. Their median age was 60 years; performance status (World Health Organization) was 0 in 12, 1 in 14, and 2 in five patients; 19 patients (61%) had prior surgery, and 14 (45%) had adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 was administered on day 1 at 150 mg/m(2) as a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion; L-OHP was administered on day 2 at 65 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour IV infusion; and on days 2 and 3, LV 200 mg/m(2) preceded 5-FU administration of 400 mg/m(2)/d initial IV bolus dose followed by 600 mg/m(2)/d 22-hour IV continuous infusion. The regimen was repeated every 2 weeks. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 30 for response to treatment. Complete response was achieved in two patients (6.5%) and partial response in 16 (51.6%) (overall response rate, 58.1%; 95% confidence interval, 40.7% to 75.4%); eight patients (25.8%) had stable disease, and five (16.1%) had disease progression. The median duration of response was 9 months, and the median time to disease progression was 13 months. Neutropenia grade 3 to 4 occurred in 14 patients (45%) and febrile neutropenia in two (6%). Diarrhea grade 3 to 4 was observed in 10 patients (32%), neurotoxicity grade 3 to 4 in three (9%), and asthenia grade 3 in two (10%). No treatment-related death has occurred. CONCLUSION: The triplet combination of 5-FU/LV + CPT-11 + L-OHP is a highly active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in MCC.     

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of two different schedules of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin, two new agents with potential synergistic activity, have demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Preclinical and clinical evidence indicating that dose intensification of the oral fluorouracil prodrug might result in improved therapeutic results led us to the present randomized multicenter phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with bidimensionally measurable ACC previously untreated for metastatic disease were randomly allocated to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) day 1 plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2)/d days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks (arm A) or to receive oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) days 1 and 14 combined with capecitabine 3,500 mg/m(2) days 1 to 7 and 14 to 21 every 4 weeks (arm B). In both treatment arms, chemotherapy was continued for a total of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progression of disease. RESULTS: Patients allocated to the high-dose capecitabine combination arm B had a higher radiologically confirmed response rate (54.5% v 42.2%) and a significantly longer median progression-free survival time than those allocated to control arm A (10.5 v 6.0 months; P =.0013). Median overall survival times cannot be calculated for either treatment arm at this point. Despite a 34% higher dose intensity of capecitabine in arm B, there was no difference in hematologic toxicity between treatment arms (neutropenia/thrombocytopenia: 60%/43% in arm B v 56%/33% in arm A). Similarly, the incidence rate and degree of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable: The most commonly encountered symptoms (all grades, arm A and arm B) included nausea/emesis (A: 58%; B: 62%), diarrhea (A: 44%; B: 31%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (A: 80%; B: 83%), and fatigue (A: 40%; B: 50%). CONCLUSION: Results of this study indicate that both combination regimens are feasible, tolerable, and clinically active. The dose-intensified bimonthly capecitabine arm, however, seems to be more effective in increasing both response rate and progression-free survival time.     

Activity and toxicity of oxaliplatin and bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in pretreated colorectal cancer patients: a phase II study

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a combination of oxaliplatin with bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients pretreated for advanced disease with various schedules including continuous fluorouracil infusion. Thirty consecutive patients with pretreated advanced CRC received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 by 2-h infusion dl, leucovorin 100 mg/m2 by 1-h infusion followed by fluorouracil 425 mg/m2 i.v. bolus from day 1 to 3 every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. The best overall response rate in an intent-to-treat analysis was 13% (2 complete responses and 2 partial responses) (95% CI, 1.2-25.5%) and 37% of patients obtained stable disease with a tumor growth control rate of 50% (95% CI, 32.1-67.9%). The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% CI, 1.4-6.5 months) and median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.9-14.1 months). The independent prognostic factors for improved overall survival were a good performance status and a response/stabilization of disease to chemotherapy. Severe neutropenia was quite common (43.3% of patients and 14.4% of cycles), although complicated by fever only in one case (3.3% of patients). There was one toxic death. In conclusion, the study combination showed an interesting rate of tumor growth control in a cohort of patients previously treated for advanced disease with various schedules including continuous fluorouracil infusion.     

卡培他滨与氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌的随机对照临床研究

背景与目的：目前对进展期及转移性胃癌还没有标准的化疗方案,而且缺乏有效率高、毒副反应小、安全的化疗方案.毒副反应是晚期胃癌化疗的限制性因素,影响患者的生活质量.本研究观察及比较两种常用化疗方案卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂方案（XELOX）与氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂方案（FOLFOX4）治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效及毒副反应,以期取得在较佳疗效保证的同时,毒副反应小,耐受性更好的效果.方法：48例晚期胃癌患者随机分成两组,XELOX组与FOLFOX4组.XELOX组25例,用卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂方案化疗,卡培他滨1000 mg/m^2,口服,2次/日,第1～14天;奥沙利铂130 mg/m^2,静脉点滴,第l天;2l d为1个周期.FOLFOX4组23例,用氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂方案化疗,奥沙利铂85 mg/m^2,静脉点滴,第1天;亚叶酸钙200 mg/m^2,静滴2 h后予氟尿嘧啶400 mg/m^2,推注,后续600 mg/m^2持续静滴22 h,第1、2天;每2周重复,4周为1周期.两组均治疗2周期以上.按wH0标准评价客观疗效和毒副反应.结果：入组48例均可评价疗效,XELOX组有效率56.0%,中位TTP 5.8个月,MST 10个月,FOLFOX4组有效率47.8%,中位TTP 5.7个月,MST 9.8个月.两组近期有效率差异无显著性.毒副反应比较,手足综合征以：XELOX组显著（P＜0.05）,Ⅲ/Ⅳ级恶心呕吐发生率以FOLFOX4.组显著（P＜0.05）,其余毒副反应除腹泻外发生率以FOIFOX4组稍高,但差异无显著性.结论：XELOX方案与FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期胃癌疗效确切,毒副反应能耐受.两组近期疗效相似,毒副反应以XELOX组更易耐受,尤其对一般情况欠佳及老年的患者耐受性好.     

Randomised phase 2 trial of SIR-Spheres plus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy versus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy alone in advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with SIR-Spheres(R) is a new technique for selectively targeting high doses of radiation to tumours within the liver. The primary objectives of this randomised trial were to compare the response rate, time to progressive disease (PD), and toxicity of a regimen of systemic fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy versus the same chemotherapy plus a single administration of SIR-Spheres in patients with advanced colorectal liver metastases. The trial was designed to presage a larger trial that would have survival as the primary outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal liver metastases, with or without extrahepatic metastases, were randomised into the study. RESULTS: Using RECIST criteria, the response rate for 11 patients receiving the combination treatment was significantly greater than for 10 patients receiving chemotherapy alone (First Integrated Response; 10 PR, 1 SD vs. 0 PR, 6 SD, 4 PD, P < 0.001 and Best Confirmed Response; 8 PR, 3 SD vs. 0 PR, 6 SD, 4 PD P < 0.001). The time to PD was greater for patients receiving the combination treatment (18.6 months vs. 3.6 months, P < 0.0005). Median survival was significantly longer for patients receiving the combination treatment (29.4 months vs. 12.8 months, P = 0.02). One patient in the combination arm died from chemotherapy induced neutropenic sepsis after the fourth chemotherapy cycle. There were more Grade 3 and 4 toxicity events in patients receiving the combination treatment. There was no difference in quality-of-life over a 3 month period between the two treatments when rated by patients (P = 0.96) or physicians (P = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: This small phase 2 randomised trial demonstrated that the addition of a single administration of SIR-Spheres to a regimen of systemic fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy significantly increased both treatment related response, time to PD, and survival with acceptable toxicity. The combination of SIR-Spheres plus systemic chemotherapy is now the subject of ongoing trials to further define patient benefit.     

伊立替康与氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙方案治疗转移性结直肠癌的临床观察

为了评价和观察伊立替康(CPT-11)联合氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)与亚叶酸钙(LV)双周方案(FOLFIRI)治疗转移性结直肠癌的临床疗效和不良反应,对56例转移性结直肠癌患者采用FOLFIRI双周方案治疗,剂量为CPT-11180 mg/m2,静脉滴入90 min,d1,LV 200 mg/m2,静脉滴入,d1,d2,5-FU 400 mg/m2,静脉推注,d1,d2,5-FU600 mg/m2,持续静脉滴入22 h,d1,d2,14 d为1个周期.54例可评价疗效,CR 1例,PR 17例,SD 23例,PD 13例,有效率33.3%.不良反应主要为延迟性腹泻、中性粒细胞减少及胆碱能综合征.初步研究结果提示,FOLFIRI双周方案治疗转移性结直肠癌疗效肯定,安全性好,不良反应可耐受,值得临床推广应用.     

ZD9331 as second- or third-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II multicenter trial

This study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of ZD9331 as second- or third-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). One hundred patients were recruited to the study: 45 in group 1 (failed first-line 5-FU-based regimen) and 55 in group 2 (failed first-line 5-FU-based regimen and second-line irinotecan). Patients received ZD9331 as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle, and treatment continued until disease progression (PD) or withdrawal. After a median of 4 cycles of treatment, there were no objective responses in group 1 (N = 37), 25 (67.6%) patients had a best overall response of stable disease (SD), and 12 (32.4%) had PD. After a median of 3 cycles of treatment, there were 2 (4.5%) partial responses in group 2 (N = 44), 21 (47.7%) patients had a best overall response of SD, 20 (45.4%) had PD, and 1 (2.3%) had clinical progression. At data cut-off, 59.5% and 77.3% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively, had PD. The main adverse events were neutropenia (69%), fatigue (53%), nausea (46%), and diarrhea (40%), and most (72.3%) were grade I/II. ZD9331 demonstrated minimal antitumor activity, and manageable toxicity, in the second- or third-line treatment of aCRC.     

奥沙利铂联合羟基喜树碱与氟尿嘧啶治疗转移性结直肠癌的随机对照临床研究

背景与目的:化疗可提高转移性结直肠癌患者的生活质量,延长生存期.含氟尿嘧啶的联合方案是转移性结直肠癌的标准治疗方案,而其不良反应是化疗的限制性因素,影响患者的生活质量.因此探索新的方案显得十分必要.本研究观察及比较两种常用化疗方案[羟基喜树碱(HCPT)联合奥沙利铂(OXA)方案(HCPTOX)与氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)/亚叶酸钙(LV)联合OXA方案(FOLFOX4)]治疗转移性结直肠癌的临床疗效及不良反应.方法:47例转移性结直肠癌患者随机分成两组,HCPTOX组与FOLFOX4组.HCPTOX组24例,给予HCPT 6 mg/m2,静脉滴注,第1～5天; OXA 130 mg/m2,静脉滴注,第1天;21 d为1个周期.FOLFOX4组23例,给予0XA 85 mg/m2,静脉滴注,第1天;LV 200 mg/m2,静脉滴注2 h滴完后再给予5-FU 400 mg/m2,静脉推注,后续600 mg/m2持续静脉滴注22 h,第1、2天;每2周重复,4周为1个周期.两组均治疗2周期以上.按WHO标准评价客观疗效和不良反应.结果:入组47例均可评价疗效,HCPTOX组有效率为50.0%,中位TTP 7.8个月,MST 13.1个月,FOLFOX4组有效率47.8%,中位TTP 7.9个月,MST 13.3个月.两组近期有效率差异无显著性(P>0.05).不良反应比较,患者Ⅲ/Ⅳ级恶心、呕吐发生率以FOLFOX4组显著(P<0.05).除腹泻外,其他不良反应发生率以FOLFOX4组稍高,但差异均无显著性(P>0.05).结论:HCPTOX方案与FOLFOX4方案治疗转移性结直肠癌均疗效确切,不良反应均能耐受.两组近期疗效相似,不良反应以HCPTOX组较易耐受,尤其对一般情况欠佳及老年患者耐受性较好.     

Biweekly oxaliplatin plus 1-day infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin followed by metronomic chemotherapy with tegafur/uracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose Metronomic chemotherapy, at a minimally toxic dose and with a frequent schedule, is a potentially novel approach to the control of advanced cancer disease via a different mechanism from maximum tolerable doses chemotherapy. Taking advantage of the potential effectiveness of metronomic therapy, tegafur/uracil (UFT) was incorporated into an oxaliplation/infusioanl fluouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) protocol in this study. The primary endpoints were response rate, time to progression (TTP) and safety profile in 5-FU-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancers (CRCs). Patients and methods Twenty-eight patients with metastatic CRCs resistant or refractory to 5-FU/LV were enrolled. Chemotherapy was administrated every 2 weeks sequentially with 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²) and LV (200 mg/m²), intravenous bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m²), 22-h infusion of 5-FU (600 mg/m²) on day 1 and then followed by 10-day daily oral UFT (200 mg/m²)/LV (30 mg/m²). Results Partial response was seen in ten (35.7%) patients. The median TTP was 5.2 (95% CI: 4.16–6.31) months and the median overall survival was 13.4 (95% CI: 6.39–20.5) months. No grade 3 toxicities above 5% according to National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) occurred except sensory neuropathy (10.7%). No grade 4 toxicity, treatment-related mortality or hand–foot syndrome was found. Conclusions This study protocol with favorable toxicity profile is thus promisingly effective against 5-FU-pretreated metastatic CRCs. Given the present experience, an evaluation of the regimen as front-line treatment of metastatic CRC is planned.     

Bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin with oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial investigated the activity and toxicity of a bolus administration schedule of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) therapy in patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients in this multicenter, open, nonrandomized study received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on the first day of each course and 5-FU and LV 350 mg/m(2) and 20 mg/m(2), respectively, as a daily bolus for 5 days, every 21 days, for a maximum of six courses. RESULTS: Partial responses occurred in 18 patients, giving an intent-to-treat response rate of 40.0%. Median time to response was 12.7 weeks; median duration of response was 18.4 weeks. Median progression-free survival was 5.9 months; median survival was 14 months. The independent prognostic factors for improved overall survival were good performance status and negative carcino-embryonic antigen blood level. Incidences of adverse effects were reduced after the 5-FU dose was reduced to 300 mg/m(2). Reversible neurologic toxicity occurred in 44.4% of patients. CONCLUSION: Bolus administration of oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and LV as first-line therapy for untreated advanced colorectal cancer is efficacious and safe. In addition to a more favorable safety profile, the 300 mg/m(2) dosage offered improved dose-intensity compared with the initial dosage.     

Phase II trial of biweekly infusional fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and activity of infusional fluorouracil (FU), folinic acid (FA), and oxaliplatin, administered every 2 weeks in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one previously untreated patients with measurable adenocarcinoma of the stomach were eligible for the study. Patients received FU 2.6 g/m(2) (24-hour continuous infusion), FA 500 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion), and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion) every 2 weeks for 6 weeks. Treatment was continued until progression of disease was observed. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 37 of 41 patients were assessable for response. Patient characteristics were: sex (male, 28; female,13), median age 60 years (range, 20 to 77 years), and median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. Response was evaluated every 6 weeks. Of 37 assessable patients, one complete and 15 partial remissions were observed (overall response rate, 43%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients (32%) and progressive disease in nine patients (24%). The median overall survival was 9.6 months. WHO grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in two patients (4.9%) and thrombocytopenia in one patient (2.4%). Other WHO grade 3 or 4 toxicities included diarrhea in three patients (7.3%) and vomiting in two patients (4.9%). There were no cases of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Biweekly fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin is active and well-tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Response rates, time to progression, and overall survival were comparable to those achieved with other combination chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFOX6, with significantly less toxicity.     

Phase III trial of irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid versus irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Purpose

To determine whether irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (mIROX) is superior to irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (FUFIRI) as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Patients and methods

A phase III, randomised, open-label multicentre study compared standard treatment with FUFIRI (irinotecan 80 mg/m², 5-fluorouracil 2000 mg/m², folinic acid 500 mg/m² weekly times 6) to mIROX using an identical schedule of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² applied on days 1, 15 and 29 of a 7-week cycle. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 479 eligible patients were randomly assigned. Progression-free survival was 7.2 months in the mIROX arm and 8.2 months in the FUFIRI arm [hazard ratio = 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.37; P = 0.178]. Comparable results were also obtained for overall survival time with 19 months in the mIROX-arm and 22 months in the FUFIRI-arm (hazard ratio = 1.08, P = 0.276). Both regimens induced an identical objective response rate (ORR) of 41%, but disease control rate (ORR plus stable disease) was significantly greater in the FUFIRI group (81% versus 68%, P = 0.001). Most frequent grades 1-4 side-effects of mIROX and FUFIRI treatment were nausea (80% versus 73%) and delayed diarrhoea (79% versus 68%). Grades 3-4 toxicities were generally below 10%, except for diarrhoea which was more frequent in the mIROX-arm compared to the FUFIRI-arm (19% versus 30%, P = 0.006)

Conclusion

mIROX failed to show superior activity compared to high-dose 5-FU/folinic acid plus irinotecan. Due to better tolerability the combination of high-dose 5-FU/folinic acid and irinotecan remains a standard of care in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Randomized, open-label, phase III study of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil plus fluorouracil versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eniluracil (EU)/fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study (FUMA3008) conducted in the United States and Canada compared the safety and efficacy of EU/5-FU (11.5 mg/m(2)/1.15 mg/m(2) twice daily for 28 days every 35 days) with that of intravenous 5-FU/LV (425 mg/m(2)/20 mg/m(2) once daily for 5 days every 28 days) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 981 patients were randomized and 964 patients received treatment (485 EU/5FU, 479 5FU/LV). Survival for EU/5-FU was not statistically equivalent (but not statistically inferior) to that for 5-FU/LV (hazard ratio, 0.880; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.03). Median duration of survival was 13.3 months in the EU/5-FU group and 14.5 months in the 5-FU/LV group. Median duration of progression-free survival for EU/5-FU was statistically inferior to that of the control group (20.0 weeks [95% CI, 19.1 to 20.9 weeks] v 22.7 weeks [95% CI, 18.3 to 24.6 weeks]; P =.01). Both treatments were well tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity in both groups; treatment-related grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in 19% of patients treated with EU/5-FU and 16% of patients receiving 5-FU/LV (P =.354). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 5% of EU/5-FU patients and 47% of 5-FU/LV patients. CONCLUSION: Safety profiles of both treatments were acceptable. Although antitumor activity was observed, EU/5-FU did not meet the protocol-specified statistical criteria for equivalence to 5-FU/LV in terms of OS.     

Feasibility of oxaliplatin and infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for Japanese patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: A combination of oxaliplatin and infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) is one of the standard regimens for palliative and adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. However, the feasibility of FOLFOX4 for Japanese patients has not been determined. We conducted this prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of FOLFOX4. METHODS: Previously treated or untreated patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the rate of completion which was defined as completion of the first 4 cycles with relative dose-intensity of oxaliplatin of 80% or higher. RESULTS: Of the 32 enrolled patients, 31 received FOLFOX4. Twenty-four patients (75%) had received prior chemotherapy. The rate of completion of the first four cycles was 87% (27/31; 95% CI, 70.2-96.4%). With the median number of cycles of nine (range, 1-26), grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity and non-hematological toxicity were seen in 12 (39%) and 5 (16%) patients, respectively. Grade 1 or 2 sensory neuropathy was seen in 28 patients (90%), but no grade 3 or 4 neuropathy was seen. Grade 1 or 2 allergic reaction was seen in five patients (16%). One patient developed fatal interstitial pneumonitis and died of respiratory failure. Objective response rate was 28.6% (6/21; 95% CI, 11.3-52.2%) in the patients with measurable lesions. Median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.6-8.5 months) in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The completion rate of the first four cycles was as high as expected with manageable toxicity, although fatal pneumonitis developed in one case. FOLFOX4 is feasible for Japanese patients.     

Phase I/II study of oxaliplatin with weekly bolus fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin (ROX) as first-line therapy for patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) with oxaliplatin is one of the current standard regimens for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Weekly bolus 5-FU with high-dose LV (Roswell Park Memorial Institute Regimen: RPMI) is the most commonly used regimen in Japan. The objectives of this study were to determine the recommended dose (RD) of RPMI combined with oxaliplatin and to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy at the RD. METHODS: The subjects were 18 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) was given intravenously over 2 h on days 1 and 15 with l-LV (250 mg/m2) given intravenously over 2 h and 5-FU as an intravenous bolus on days 1, 8, and 15. This treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. The dose of 5-FU was escalated from 400 mg/m2 (level 1) to 500 mg/m2 (level 2). RESULTS: A total of 14 patients received level 1, and 4 received level 2. Three of the patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in cycle 1 of level 2 (grade 3 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 neutropenia and grade 2 neutropenia in one patient each), requiring that treatment was delayed for longer than 7 days. None of the 14 patients given level 1 had DLT or grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity. Sensory neuropathy occurred in all patients. Objective response rates were 61% in the 18 patients studied and 64% at level 1. The median time to progression was 171 days, and the median overall survival time was 603 days in the 18 patients studied. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) with weekly bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m2) and high-dose l-LV (250 mg/m2) is recommended for further phase III studies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Randomized phase II study of irinotecan plus mitomycin C vs. oxaliplatin plus mitomycin C in patients with advanced fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-pretreated colorectal cancer

Introduction: Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are two new agents with promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Based on preclinical and clinical evidence that both drugs might act synergistically with mitomycin C, a randomized study using a 'pick the winner' design was undertaken to determine the effectiveness and tolerance of these two combination schedules in patients with fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-pretreated advanced colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Sixty-four patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who progressed while receiving or within 6 months after discontinuing palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines/leucovorin were enrolled onto this study. They were randomly assigned to treatment with irinotecan 120 mg/m ² on days 1+15 plus mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 on day 1 (arm A) or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m ² on days 1+15 plus mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 on day 1 (arm B). In both treatment arms, courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Results: The objective response rate in arm A is 7/33 (21.2%; 95% confidence interval, 9.0-38.9%) as compared to 5/31 in arm B (16.1%; 95% CI, 5.5-34.7%). Stable disease was noted in 48.5 vs. 45.2%, whereas the tumor progressed in 30.3 vs. 38.7%, respectively. Similar to the recorded response activities, the difference of the two combination regimens in terms of median time to progression (7.0 vs. 5.2 months) and overall survival (12.0 vs. 11.2 months) was only minor and clincally insignificant. The tolerance of treatment was acceptable in both arms, though severe adverse reactions requiring dose reductions (30 vs.16%) and treatment delays (22 vs. 13% of courses) were more commonly noted with irinotecan/mitomycin C. The most common toxicities in arm A were neutropenia (85%; WHO grade 3/4 in 33%), thrombocytopenia (52%), diarrhea (45%), emesis (52%) and alopecia (92%). In arm B, common toxicities included neutropenia (68%; grade 3/4 in 13%), thrombocytopenia (81%), emesis (52%), and peripheral neutropathy (48%). Conclusions: Both mitomycin C combination regimens seem to provide an acceptable therapeutic index in patients with fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. In view of the increasing need for a broader chemotherapeutic armentarium for second-line therapy of this common malignant disease, both regimens may be worthwhile to undergo further clinical investigation.     

Tegafur and uracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II trial

The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of tegafur and uracil (UFT; 1:4 molar ratio) plus leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. One hundred forty-one patients were entered into the study. The treatment schedule consisted of UFT 300 mg/m2/day (in three divided doses) plus oral LV 150 mg/day (50 mg t.i.d.) over 28 days. The treatment cycle was repeated every 5 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The treatment was interrupted if grade 3/4 toxicity appeared and was resumed at the same dosage on recovery. One hundred thirty-six patients were evaluable for response and 141 were evaluable for toxicity. The response rate was 19.9% (95% confidence interval: 12%-28%). The total number of patients without progression (objective response + stable disease) was 76 (55.9%). The median time to progression was 5.6 months, and the overall survival was 11.6 months. The toxicity profile was low, with 11% of patients experiencing grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting, while 17% had grade 3/4 diarrhea. Oral administration of UFT modulated with LV is a comfortable regimen of chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.