Diagnostic yield of dual-phase computed tomography enterography in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and a non-diagnostic capsule endoscopy

Background and Aim: In patients with obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, capsule endoscopy is widely used to determine the source of bleeding. However, there is currently no consensus on how to further evaluate patients with obscure GI bleeding with a non‐diagnostic capsule endoscopy examination. This study aims to determine the diagnostic yield of dual‐phase computed tomographic enterography (CTE) in patients with obscure GI bleeding and a non‐diagnostic capsule endoscopy. Methods: Patients with obscure GI bleeding who were referred for capsule endoscopy were prospectively enrolled. Obscure GI bleeding was defined as overt if there was obvious GI bleeding; otherwise it was defined as occult. Patients with a non‐diagnostic capsule endoscopy and no contraindications underwent a CTE. Results: Capsule endoscopy was performed in 52 patients; 26 patients (50%) had occult GI bleeding and 26 patients (50%) had overt GI bleeding. CTE was then performed in 25 of the 48 patients without a definitive source of bleeding seen on capsule endoscopy. The diagnostic yield of CTE was 0% (0/11) in patients with occult bleeding versus 50% (7/14) in patients with overt bleeding (P < 0.01). Using clinical follow up as the gold standard, for the 25 patients with a non‐diagnostic capsule, CTE had a sensitivity of 33% (95% confidence interval 0.15, 0.56) and a specificity of 75% (95% confidence interval 0.22, 0.99). Conclusions: In patients with a non‐diagnostic capsule endoscopy examination, CTE is useful for detecting a source of GI bleeding in patients with overt, but not occult, obscure GI bleeding.     

Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: Results of a pilot study

BACKGROUND: A video capsule has been developed to acquire photographic images of the small intestine during normal peristaltic motion. METHODS: Patients between 21 and 80 years of age referred for enteroscopy because of obscure GI bleeding were offered entry into a trial in which they would undergo both capsule endoscopy and subsequent push enteroscopy. Results of capsule examinations were compared with push enteroscopy findings. Capsule endoscopy was performed with the Given M2A video capsule system. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (12 women, 9 men, average age 61 years) were enrolled, all of whom completed the study. A bleeding site was found in 11 of 20 patients during capsule endoscopy. No additional intestinal diagnoses were made by enteroscopy. The yield of push enteroscopy in the evaluation of obscure bleeding was 30% (6/20), the yield of capsule endoscopy 55% (11/20). This difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0625). Capsule endoscopy found a distal source of bleeding in 5 of 14 patients who had normal push enteroscopic examinations. Patients preferred capsule endoscopy to enteroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates that capsule endoscopy provides excellent visualization of the small intestine, is well tolerated by patients, and is safe. Capsule endoscopy identified small intestinal bleeding sites beyond the range of push enteroscopy.     

Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a promising diagnostic tool for the study of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the diagnostic yield of this technique has not been adequately studied. We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of CE and the outcome after CE in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS:One hundred consecutive patients (all with recent negative upper and lower endoscopy; 26 with ongoing overt bleeding [group A], 31 with previous overt bleeding [group B], and 43 with guaiac-positive stools and iron-deficiency anemia [group C]) underwent CE. RESULTS: The yield of positive findings on CE was 92.3% in group A, 12.9% in group B, and 44.2% in group C (P < 0.0001, A vs. B, A vs. C). Angiodysplasia (29%) and Crohn's disease (6%) were the most common diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CE were 88.9%, 95%, 97%, and 82.6%, respectively. CE results led to treatments resolving the bleeding in 86.9% of patients undergoing the procedure while actively bleeding. Capsule retention because of unsuspected stenosis occurred in 5 patients and required surgery, which resolved the clinical problem, in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS:CE is an effective diagnostic tool for patients with obscure GI bleeding. The best candidates for the procedure are those with ongoing obscure-overt bleeding or with obscure-occult bleeding. If done early in the course of the workup, CE could shorten considerably the time to diagnosis, lead to definitive treatment in a relevant proportion of patients, and spare a number of alternative investigations with low diagnostic yield.     

胶囊内镜对不明原因消化道出血的诊断价值

目的 比较胶囊内镜与传统小肠俭查方法对不明原因消化道出血的诊断价值。方法 总结分析67例胃镜、肠镜检查阴性的消化道出血患者中消化道钡餐、肠系膜动脉造影、推进式小肠镜、胶囊内镜及剖腹探查包括手术中肠镜结果。结果 不明原因消化道出血上、中消化道钡餐检查检出率为17．6％，诊断率为13．8％；肠系膜动脉造影检查检出率和诊断率均为13．4％；推进式小肠镜检查检出率、诊断率为．32％；剖腹探查及术中肠镜检出率和诊断率均为83．3％；胶囊内镜检查检出率为80．6％，诊断率为67．7％结论 胶囊内镜检查对于不明原因消化道出血具有较高的检出率和诊断率．明显优于传统的检查方法。     

Diagnostic Yield and Impact of Capsule Endoscopy on Management of Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding of Obscure Origin

This study assessed diagnostic yield and impact of capsule endoscopy on patient management. Seventy-five patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding were included. Clinical and followup information was collected by review of patient records and with personal contact with the referring physicians. All previous clinical information and interventions after capsule endoscopy and clinical outcome were noted. The indication was obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding in 36 patients (48%) and obscure-occult gastrointestinal bleeding in 39 patients (52%). Overall diagnostic yield was 66.7% considering relevant lesions. Followup was available in 31 patients. Capsule endoscopy changed clinical management in 61.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with another potential source of bleeding and patients whose onset was hematochezia were not good candidates for capsule endoscopy. Capsule endoscopy has a high diagnostic yield and a positive influence on clinical management in a high proportion of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.     

Capsule enteroscopy vs. other diagnostic procedures in diagnosing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a cost-effectiveness study

BACKGROUND: Capsule enteroscopy is considered the gold standard for evaluating patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. The costs of capsule enteroscopy examination, however, make it uncertain whether the clinically relevant diagnostic gain is also associated with cost savings. AIM: To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of capsule enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: Retrospective study was carried out in nine Italian gastroenterology units from 2003 to 2005. Data on 369 consecutive patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding were collected. The diagnostic yield of capsule enteroscopy vs. other imaging procedures was evaluated as a measure of efficacy. The values of Diagnosis Related Group 175 (euro 1884.00 for obscure-occult bleeding and euro 2141.00 for obscure-overt bleeding) were calculated as measures of economic outcomes in the cost analysis. RESULTS: Obscure and occult gastrointestinal bleeding was recorded in 177 patients (48%) with a mean duration of anemia history of 17.6+/-20.7 months. Among patients, 60.9% had had at least one hospital admission, 21.2% at least two, and 1.2% of obscure bleeders up to nine admissions. Overall, 58.4% of patients had positive findings with capsule enteroscopy compared with 28.0% with other imaging procedures (P<0.001). The mean cost of a positive diagnosis with capsule enteroscopy was euro 2090.76 and that of other procedures was euro 3828.83 with a mean cost saving of euro 1738.07 (P<0.001) for one positive diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule enteroscopy is a cost-saving approach in the evaluation of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.     

A prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy is used to investigate the small bowel in patients with GI bleeding of obscure etiology. Capsule endoscopy was compared prospectively with push enteroscopy in 20 patients with GI hemorrhage. METHODS: Twenty patients (8 men, 12 women; mean age 65.5 years, range 38-80 years) were enrolled in the study. All had undergone non-diagnostic EGD, colonoscopy, and barium contrast radiography of the small bowel. All patients underwent capsule endoscopy followed by push enteroscopy. The physician performing the enteroscopy (senior endoscopist) interpreted the capsule endoscopy in an unblinded manner, while a second blinded reviewer (endoscopy fellow) interpreted the capsule endoscopy to establish interinterpreter reliability. RESULTS: There was complete agreement between the blinded and the unblinded physicians in 18 of 20 cases; minor disparities were noted in the remaining two cases. In the small bowel, capsule endoscopy identified positive findings in 14 (70%) patients, whereas, push enteroscopy identified positive findings in 5 (25%) patients. Despite these results, the findings were definitive in only 6 of the 20 patients by using capsule endoscopy, and in two of 20 patients with push enteroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: When strict standards of interpretation were used, capsule endoscopy resulted in more positive findings than push enteroscopy, but the number of definitive findings for both imaging methods was low. There was a high degree of reliability between a novice and an experienced endoscopist with respect to the interpretation of capsule endoscopy.     

Can clinical features predict the likelihood of finding abnormalities when using capsule endoscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin?

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy is becoming the investigation of choice for GI bleeding of obscure etiology. This study examined whether clinical or other features predict an increased likelihood of finding a lesion in patients with this type of bleeding. METHODS: Clinical and other data were collected prospectively for 92 patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for GI bleeding of obscure origin. Patients were divided into two groups: those with overt bleeding (42 patients) and those with anemia alone (50 patients). The relationship between these data and the findings at capsule endoscopy was examined. RESULTS: A definite or probable cause of bleeding was found in 60 patients (angiodysplasias 47, tumor 7, ulcer 3, gastric antral vascular ectasia 2). There was no difference between the two groups with respect to age, gender, mode of presentation, duration of bleeding, or need for transfusion. Lesions were found as often in patients who had only one preceding endoscopy and colonoscopy as in those who had multiple procedures. Colonic cleansing and cecal imaging by the capsule did not influence the result. Hospitalized patients were more likely to have an actively bleeding lesion detected. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy is equally useful in patients with overt and occult GI bleeding of obscure origin. Capsule endoscopy should be performed early in the evaluation of these patients.     

Wireless capsule endoscopy for diagnosis of small intestinal lesions

Background: Capsule endoscopy represents a new and highly innovative method of visualizing the small intestine. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the practicality, usefulness and diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy in a group of patients with suspected small intestinal disease. Methods: Eleven patients underwent capsule endoscopy using the M2A Capsule Endoscope? (Given Imaging, Yogneam, Israel). The indications for the procedure were: obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in seven patients, evaluation of Crohn's disease in three patients and unexplained abdominal pain and weight loss in one patient. Results: Abnormalities were detected in six of 11 patients overall. Detection of abnormalities was highest among patients with obscure GI bleeding where active bleeding and/or the source of bleeding was identified in five of the seven (71.4%) patients. One of the three patients with Crohn's disease had an ileal ulcer detected, while the remaining patient with unexplained weight loss and pain had a normal examination. Conclusion: We have found in our preliminary experience that capsule endoscopy is a useful and practical procedure to perform especially for evaluation of obscure GI bleeding.     

Double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin

BACKGROUND: Small-bowel bleeding is difficult to treat and diagnose. The recent introduction of wireless capsule endoscopy permits examination of the entire small intestine, but this method lacks tissue sampling and therapeutic capabilities. Recently, Yamamoto et al established a double-balloon insertion method for enteroscopy that allows examination of the entire small bowel and interventional options. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding. SETTING: Single-center prospective study. PATIENTS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with obscure GI bleeding (13 females, 18 males; mean age 56.4 +/- 3.2 years). Criteria for inclusion in the study were documented iron deficiency anemia (hemoglobin level <10 g/dL or a decrease of >2 g/dL over > or =2 months); upper endoscopy not revealing a site/cause of blood loss; and similarly uninformative lower endoscopy including examination of the terminal ileum. INTERVENTIONS: Endoscopic biopsy or therapy was performed as clinically indicated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic yield for patients with obscure GI bleeding and patient follow-up. RESULTS: Double-balloon enteroscopy was completed without complications in all patients. Bleeding points were identified in 23 patients (74.2%). In 21 (91.3%) of these 23 patients the cause of blood loss was identified and treated with no further bleeding at 8.5 +/- 0.6 months of follow-up. LIMITATIONS: Small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that double-balloon enteroscopy is useful for evaluation and treatment of patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin.     

Capsule endoscopy： Current status in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a safe, non invasive diagnostic modality for the evaluation of small bowel lesions. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) is one of the most important indications of capsule endoscopy. Capsule endoscopy has a very high diagnostic yield especially if the bleeding is ongoing. This technique appears to be superior to other techniques for the detection of suspected lesions and the source of bleeding. Capsule endoscopy has been shown to change the outcome in patients with obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleed.     

Capsule Endoscopy Versus Push Enteroscopy for Evaluation of Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding with 1-Year Outcomes

Because of the low diagnostic yield of standard radiologic tests for identifying sources of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in the small intestine, we compared wireless video capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy and small-bowel follow-through. Patients referred to Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, between August and December 2001 for evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding were potential candidates. Eligible patients had previously inconclusive endoscopy, colonoscopy, small-bowel follow-through, and other radiologic studies. Participants underwent capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy (within 24 hr). The primary end point was localization of any bleeding source, with 1-year telephone follow-up. Capsule endoscopy yielded positive findings in 10 of 20 patients (11 men; mean age, 69 years), 6 of whom had negative enteroscopy and small-bowel follow-through. No patient with negative findings on capsule endoscopy had positive findings on enteroscopy and small-bowel follow-through. At follow-up, 19 patients reported fewer transfusions, gastrointestinal procedures, and hospitalizations. Capsule endoscopy identified more lesions and improved outcomes.Published as an abstract at Digestive Disease Week, San Francisco, California, May 19–22, 2002.     

The patient with recidivent obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is defined as visible or invisible GI blood loss, the source of which can not be identified by standard endoscopy (oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy). Nowadays, GI bleeding is divided into upper, mid- and lower bleeding. Mid-GI bleeding covers the section from the Treitz ligament to the ileocaecal valve. The new diagnostic methods of capsule endoscopy and double balloon enteroscopy have revolutionised the diagnostic approach in recent years. As a result, previous radiological and nuclear medicine techniques (small bowel X-ray, scintigraphy and angiography), but also endoscopic techniques, such as the push enteroscopy and intraoperative endoscopy, are becoming less important. After standard endoscopy and persistent blood loss it is advisable to first have these procedures repeated by an experienced examiner under optimal conditions. Nevertheless, no source of bleeding is identified by this method in 5% of cases. It is then recommended to use capsule endoscopy and, depending on the findings, double balloon enteroscopy with the option of intervention. In patients with unstable circulation an invasive procedure (intraoperative endoscopy) may be required.     

Non-small-bowel lesions detected by capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding

BACKGROUND: Approximately two thirds of patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure GI bleeding will have an abnormality found in the small intestine. This report describes 9 patients (4 men, 5 women) of 140 with obscure bleeding in whom a source of their blood loss was found in the stomach or the colon at capsule endoscopy. METHODS: A review was made of a prospective database of 140 consecutive patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure GI bleeding at a single center. Patients with a definite or likely cause of bleeding within reach of conventional upper or lower GI endoscopy were identified. RESULTS: Three patients had gastric antral vascular ectasia and another an inflamed pyloric canal polyp. Two patients had actively bleeding cecal carcinoma, missed at previous colonoscopies. Two others had bleeding cecal angiodysplasia. The final patient had severe nonspecific cecal inflammation. The identification of these lesions was aided by the suspected blood indicator. All patients underwent endoscopic therapy or surgery for their non-small-bowel lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Like push enteroscopy, capsule endoscopy also can identify lesions within reach of conventional endoscopy and colonoscopy. These subsequently can be treated successfully. The reasons why these lesions have been missed are unclear.     

Impact of capsule endoscopy in obscure small-bowel bleeding: defining strict diagnostic criteria for a favorable outcome

BACKGROUND: The most frequent indication for capsule endoscopy is to diagnose the cause of obscure GI bleeding. The objective of the study was to determine the impact of capsule endoscopy on the outcome of patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin. METHODS: Ninety-six patients (53 men, 43 women; mean [standard deviation] age, 60.84 years [16.55 years]) were enrolled in the study. All patients have been subjected to gastroscopy, colonoscopy, small-bowel barium follow-through or enteroclysis, and push enteroscopy; no bleeding site had been identified. Capsule endoscopy was performed with the Given M2A video capsule system. By using strict criteria, studies were classified as having positive findings, findings of uncertain significance, and no findings. Outcome was defined as continued or complete resolution of bleeding. RESULTS: Positive findings, findings of uncertain significance, and no findings were identified in 41.7%, 20.8%, and 37.5% of our study population, respectively. The most common lesions seen were angiodysplasias of the small intestine. Therapeutic intervention was possible in 82.5% of patients with positive findings and in 35.0% of patients with findings of uncertain significance. Complete resolution of bleeding, after a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 14 months (9-17 months), occurred significantly more often in patients with positive findings (68.4%) compared with patients with findings of uncertain significance and no findings (40.8%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy increases the diagnostic yield in the workup of patients with obscure small-bowel bleeding. Strictly defined positive findings are associated with a favorable outcome.     

Frequency and clinical outcome of capsule retention during capsule endoscopy for GI bleeding of obscure origin

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy is now commonly performed for GI bleeding of obscure origin. Regional transit abnormality refers to slowed capsule movement during capsule endoscopy. The frequency and clinical outcome of capsule retention and regional transit abnormalities are unknown. METHODS: Initial capsule endoscopies performed at a single institution in 52 patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin were reviewed retrospectively. For patients with capsule retention or regional transit abnormality, preprocedural characteristics, and post-procedural outcomes were recorded. OBSERVATIONS: Capsule retention occurred in 7 patients, all of whom remained asymptomatic. Regional transit abnormality was noted in 3 patients. Sources of bleeding were localized in all cases. Seven patients underwent surgery. Stricture induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was the major cause of retention. In all patients, anemia resolved during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule retention and regional transit abnormality occurred in almost 20% of patients who had capsule endoscopy for GI bleeding of obscure origin. These capsule movement abnormalities led to the diagnosis of bleeding sources and thereby influenced patient management. A history of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use may be associated with an increased risk of capsule retention.     

Wireless capsule endoscopy for obscure small-bowel disorders: final results of the first pediatric controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Obscure small-bowel disorders are jejunal and ileal lesions undiagnosed by traditional imaging techniques (endoscopic, radiologic). We evaluated the diagnostic usefulness and safety of capsule endoscopy for obscure small-bowel disorders in children and adolescents. METHODS: Comparative, prospective, self-controlled trials in patients (age, 10-18 y) suspected to have either small-bowel Crohn's disease, polyps, or obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Capsule results were compared with the diagnostic imaging studies normally used in this age group. RESULTS: Among 20 patients suspected of Crohn's disease, multiple lesions consistent with this diagnosis were observed by capsule endoscopy in 50%. Small-bowel Crohn's disease was ruled out in 8 patients. Eosinophilic enteropathy was found in 2 others. For polyp detection (n = 6), capsule endoscopy yielded 100% concordance with the control studies when analyzed per patient. However, capsule endoscopy revealed a greater number (50%) of polyps. Among patients with obscure bleeding (n = 4), the capsule examination confirmed a diagnosis of vascular malformations in 3. Capsule endoscopy more accurately identified the precise source of bleeding compared with angiography. All 30 capsule studies were well tolerated, although 1 capsule was retained owing to an inflammatory stenosis. The capsule eventually was expelled after corticosteroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy correctly diagnosed or excluded a bleeding source, small-bowel polyps, or Crohn's disease of the small bowel in 29 of 30 patients. Capsule endoscopy permits an accurate, noninvasive approach for diagnosing obscure small bowel lesions in children over the age of 10.     

Wireless capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a single-centre, one-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) is increasingly being used in the investigation of obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, but some studies have found that many of the bleeding lesions recognized by this technique are within the reach of conventional endoscopy. METHODS: The results of CE performed in the authors' centre in a 12 month period for obscure GI bleeding were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 46 patients with obscure GI bleeding, CE found a definite or probable cause in 19 (41%) and a possible cause in another 10 (22%), with an overall diagnostic yield of 63%. One of these lesions was found to be within reach of conventional gastroscopy, two were within reach of push enteroscopy, four were within reach of colonoscopy and one was within reach of retrograde enteroscopy through a stoma. The percentage of patients with a bleeding source within reach of routine endoscopy but missed during pre-CE endoscopy was significantly higher for those patients having endoscopy only in the community (30% [eight of 27]) versus in the authors' centre (0% [zero of 19]). CONCLUSIONS: CE was valuable for diagnosing bleeding lesions not only within the small bowel, but also in the stomach and colon. However, "second-look" endoscopy may be considered before ordering CE for obscure GI bleeding when local expertise is available.     

双气囊小肠镜与胶囊内镜诊断小肠出血病因比较

目的比较双气囊小肠镜和胶囊内镜在小肠出血中的诊断准确率和实用价值。方法24例原因不明的可疑小肠出血患者分别接受双气囊小肠镜和胶囊内镜检查。双气囊小肠镜首选进镜方式分为经口或经肛2种，首选方式检查后未发现病灶者，日后改换进镜方式再行检查。胶囊内镜采用以色列GIVEN公司产品。2种检查方法分别由专门医师独立操作并诊断，最后进行汇总比较。结果24例患者中21例通过小肠镜检查发现病灶，总检出率为87．5％。24例患者行胶囊内镜检查后，有阳性发现者11例(45．8％)，另13例无异常发现。双气囊小肠镜检查发现的阳性病灶均经活检病理和手术探查证实，其病因诊断准确率为87．5％，胶囊内镜诊断准确率为25％。在耐受性评估方面，胶囊内镜和全麻下经口进镜的耐受性最佳，以后依次为非麻醉经肛方式和非麻醉经口方式。所有小肠镜和胶囊内镜检查者中未见操作相关的严重不良反应。结论①经口和经肛方式结合能使双气囊小肠镜完成对全小肠的检查。②双气囊小肠镜在不明原因小肠出血的病因诊断方面明显优于胶囊内镜检查。③胶囊内镜在小肠多节段病变和长段病变的诊断上仍有一定价值。④胶囊内镜和全麻下经口双气囊小肠镜检查是一项易为患者接受的、安全的检查方法。     

Capsule endoscopy versus push enteroscopy in patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND: Wireless capsule endoscopy is a new method enabling non-invasive diagnostic endoscopy of the entire small intestine. In this study we prospectively examined the diagnostic precision of capsule endoscopy compared with push enteroscopy in patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: Between July 2001 and October 2002 we examined 48 patients with suspected disorders of the small intestine using capsule endoscopy. 33 patients with obscure bleeding (19 men, 14 women, mean age 58 +/- 23 years) were prospectively examined using capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy. RESULTS: On average, the patients had been suffering from chronic gastrointestinal bleeding for 30 +/- 36 (1-120) months. The lowest haemoglobin level was 6.5 +/- 1.6 g/dl (2.3-9.6) and on average 9 +/- 10 (0-50) blood units were transfused. Each patient underwent 4 +/- 2 (1-10) hospitalisations, with a mean 9 +/- 4 (5-17) diagnostic procedures before capsule endoscopy was used. Definitive bleeding sites were diagnosed by push enteroscopy in 7 patients (angiodysplasia [n = 5], ulcers [n = 1], multiple jejunal diverticula [n = 1]). Capsule endoscopy showed a bleeding source in 25 cases (76 %) (angiodysplasias [n = 15], Meckel's diverticulum [n = 1], ulcers [n = 7], ileum diverticulosis [n = 1], B-cell lymphoma [n = 1]). Push enteroscopy localised an additional bleeding source in comparison with capsule endoscopy (multiple jejunal diverticula) in one patient. Both methods of examination were safe and showed no complications. DISCUSSION: The present study shows that capsule endoscopy had the highest diagnostic yield and was superior to push enteroscopy in patients with chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. By using the capsule at an early stage the subsequent therapeutic procedure could be considerably shortened and diagnostic processes could possibly be optimised.