A specific RAD51 haplotype increases breast cancer risk in Jewish non-Ashkenazi high-risk women

While the precise genes involved in determining familial breast cancer risk in addition to BRCA1/2 are mostly unknown, one strong candidate is RAD51. Jewish non-Ashkenazi women at high-risk for breast/ovarian cancer and ethnically matched controls were genotyped using four single nucleotide polymorphisms spanning the RAD51 genomic region, and the resulting haplotypes were constructed using the GERBIL algorithm. A total of 314 individuals were genotyped: 184 non-Ashkenazi high-risk women (119 with breast cancer), and 130 unaffected, average-risk ethnically matched controls. Using GEBRIL, three frequent haplotypes were constructed. One of the haplotypes (TGTA - coined haplotype 3) was present in 7.3% (19/260 haplotypes) of controls (n=130) and in 16.8% (40/238 haplotypes) of high-risk breast cancer patients (n=119, P=0.001). A specific RAD51 haplotype is more prevalent among non-Ashkenazi Jewish high-risk women than in average-risk population.     

Immunohistochemical expression of DNA repair proteins in familial breast cancer differentiate BRCA2-associated tumors.

PURPOSE: Morphologic and immunohistochemical studies of familial breast cancers have identified specific characteristics associated with BRCA1 mutation-associated tumors when compared with BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 tumors, but have not identified differences between BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 tumors. Because BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes participate in the DNA repair pathway, we have performed an immunohistochemical study with markers related to this pathway to establish the profile of the three groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have studied two tissue microarrays that include 103 familial and 104 sporadic breast tumors, with a panel of DNA repair markers including ATM, CHEK2, RAD51, RAD50, XRCC3, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. RESULTS: We found more frequent expression of CHEK2 in BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors than in non-BRCA1/2 and sporadic tumors. We found absence of nuclear expression and presence of cytoplasmic expression of RAD51 in BRCA2 tumors that differentiate them from other familial tumors. We validated these results with a new series of patient cases. The final study with 253 familial patient cases (74 BRCA1, 71 BRCA2, 108 non-BRCA1/2), and 288 sporadic patient cases, has allowed us to confirm our preliminary results. Because BRCA2 tumors present a specific immunohistochemical profile for RAD51 and CHEK2 markers that is different from non-BRCA1/2 tumors, we have built a multivariate model with these markers that distinguish both tumors with an estimated probability of at least 76%. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that BRCA2 tumors demonstrate more cytoplasmic and less nuclear RAD51 staining, and increased CHEK2 staining. This pattern may distinguish BRCA2 from familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors.     

Mutation status of RAD51C,PALB2 and BRIP1 in 100 Japanese familial breast cancer cases without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

In addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2, RAD51C, PALB2 and BRIP1 are known as breast cancer susceptibility genes. However, the mutation status of these genes in Japanese familial breast cancer cases has not yet been evaluated. To this end, we analyzed the exon sequence and genomic rearrangement of RAD51C, PALB2 and BRIP1 in 100 Japanese patients diagnosed with familial breast and ovarian cancer and without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. We detected a large deletion from exons 6 to 9 in RAD51C, 4 novel BRIP1 missense variants containing 3 novel non‐synonymous variants, c.89A>C, c.736A>G and c.2131A>G, and a splice donor site variant c.918+2T>C. No deleterious variant of PALB2 was detected. The results of pedigree analysis showed that the proband with a large deletion on RAD51C had a family history of both breast and ovarian cancer, and the families of probands with novel BRIP1 missense variants included a male patient with breast cancer or many patients with breast cancer within the second‐degree relatives. We showed that the mutation frequency of RAD51C in Japanese familial breast cancer cases was similar to that in Western countries and that the prevalence of deleterious mutation of PALB2 was possibly lower. Furthermore, our results suggested that BRIP1 mutation frequency in Japan might differ from that in Western countries.     

Cisplatin resistance conferred by the RAD51D (E233G) genetic variant is dependent upon p53 status in human breast carcinoma cell lines

RAD51D, a paralog of the mammalian RAD51 gene, contributes towards maintaining genomic integrity by homologous recombination DNA repair and telomere maintenance. A RAD51D variant, E233G, was initially identified as a potential susceptibility allele in high‐risk, site‐specific, familial breast cancer. We describe in this report that the Rad51d (E233G) genetic variant confers increased cisplatin resistance and cell growth phenotypes in human breast carcinoma cell lines with a mutant p53 gene (BT20 and T47D) but not with a wild‐type p53 gene (MCF‐7). Treatment with a p53 specific inhibitor, pifithrin α, restored this resistant phenotype in the MCF‐7 cell line. Additionally, Rad51d (E233G) conferred increased cisplatin resistance of an MCF7 cell line in which p53 expression was stably knocked down by shRNAp53, indicating that the effect of this variant is dependent upon p53 status. Further study of Rad51d (E233G) will provide mechanistic insight towards the role of RAD51D in cellular response to anticancer agents and as a potential target for cancer therapy. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Screening for RAD51 and BRCA2 BRC repeat mutations in breast and ovarian cancer families

Together, germline mutations in the two major susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for approximately 20-30% and 70-80% of the familial breast and ovarian cancer cases, respectively. This indicates involvement of additional susceptibility genes, perhaps in combination with a polygenic effect. However, it is also possible that part of the mutations disrupting BRCA1 and BRCA2 function still remains to be discovered. In response to double-strand DNA damage the co-operation between RAD51 and BRCA2 is of great importance, and the conserved BRC repeat motifs in BRCA2 are crucial for this interaction. In the current study, patients belonging to 126 breast and/or ovarian cancer families were screened for RAD51 and BRCA2 BRC repeat mutations in order to uncover aberrations that may contribute to hereditary cancer susceptibility. The performed study revealed several novel alterations, however, none of them appeared to be disease-related. Thus, it seems likely that germline mutations in the highly conserved RAD51 gene are extremely rare and generally poorly tolerated.     

Familial breast cancers without mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have low cyclin E and high cyclin D1 in contrast to cancers in BRCA mutation carriers.

PURPOSE: We analyzed the expression of critical cell cycle regulators cyclin E and cyclin D1 in familial breast cancer, focusing on BRCA mutation-negative tumors. Cyclin E expression in tumors of BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers is higher, and cyclin D1 expression lower, than in sporadic tumors. In familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors, cyclin E and cyclin D1 expression has not been studied. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Cyclin E and cyclin D1 immunohistochemical expression was studied in tissue microarrays consisting of 53 BRCA1, 58 BRCA2, 798 familial non-BRCA1/2, and 439 sporadic breast tumors. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, BRCA1 tumors had significantly more frequently high cyclin E (88%) and low cyclin D1 (84%) expression than sporadic (54% and 49%, respectively) or familial non-BRCA1/2 (38% and 45%, respectively) tumors. BRCA2 tumors had significantly more frequently low cyclin D1 expression (68%) than sporadic or familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors and significantly more frequently high cyclin E expression than familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors. In a logistic regression model, cyclin expression, early age of onset, and estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status were the independent factors most clearly distinguishing tumors of BRCA1 mutation carriers from other familial breast cancers. High cyclin E and low cyclin D1 expression were also independent predictors of BRCA2 mutation when compared with familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors. Most interestingly, lower frequency of high cyclin E expression independently distinguished familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors also from sporadic ones. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclin E and cyclin D1 expression distinguishes non-BRCA1/2 tumors from both sporadic and BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated tumors and may reflect different predisposition and pathogenesis in these groups.     

Mutation analysis of RAD51L1 (RAD51B/REC2) in multiple-case, non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families

Although a significant proportion of familial aggregation of breast cancer remains unexplained, many of the currently known breast cancer susceptibility genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53, play a role in maintaining genome integrity by engaging in DNA repair. RAD51L1 is one of the five RAD51 paralogs involved in homologous recombination (HR) repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs); it also interacts directly with p53. Deleterious mutations have been found in one RAD51 paralog, RAD51C (RAD51L2), in non-BRCA1/2 breast and ovarian cancer families, which suggests that all five paralogs are strong candidate breast cancer susceptibility genes. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) has already identified a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) deep within intron 10 of RAD51L1 as a risk locus for breast cancer. Based on its biological functions and association with RAD51C, there is reason to suggest that RAD51L1 (RAD51B/REC2) may also contain high risk mutations in the gene that give rise to multiple-case breast cancer families. In order to investigate this hypothesis, we have used high resolution melt (HRM) analysis to screen RAD51L1 for germline mutations in 188 non-BRCA1/2 multiple-case breast cancer families and 190 controls. We identified a total of seven variants: one synonymous, three intronic, and three previously identified SNPs, but no truncating or nonsense changes. Therefore, our results suggest that RAD51L1 is unlikely to represent a high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility gene.     

Common nonsense mutations in RAD52.

RAD51, RAD52, and RAD54 encode proteins that are critical to the repair of double-strand DNA breaks by homologous recombination. The physical interactions among the products of RAD51, BRCA1, and BRCA2 have suggested that the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility genes may function, at least in part, in this DNA damage repair pathway. Given the observation that different genes within a common functional pathway may be targeted by mutations in human cancers, we analyzed RAD51, RAD52, and RAD54 for the presence of germ-line mutations in 100 cases with early-onset breast cancer and for somatic mutations in 15 human breast cancer cell lines. Two premature stop codons, Ser346ter and Tyr415ter, were identified in germ-line RAD52 alleles from 5% of early-onset breast cancer cases. Together, these two heterozygous mutations were also found in 8% of a healthy control population, indicating that they do not confer an increased risk for breast cancer. A rare germ-line missense mutation was identified in RAD54, whereas no sequence variants were found in RAD51. None of the three RAD genes demonstrated somatic mutations in breast cancer cell lines. We conclude that, despite their potential functional association with the BRCA gene products, RAD51, RAD52, and RAD54 are not themselves targeted by mutations in human breast cancer. The presence of common nonsense mutations in RAD52 within the population may have significance for other conditions associated with potential alterations in DNA damage repair pathways.     

BRIP1, PALB2, and RAD51C mutation analysis reveals their relative importance as genetic susceptibility factors for breast cancer

Mutations in the recognized breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, ATM, and CHEK2 account for approximately 20% of hereditary breast cancer. This raises the possibility that mutations in other biologically relevant genes may be involved in genetic predisposition to breast cancer. In this study, BRIP1, PALB2, and RAD51C were sequenced for mutations as a result of previously being associated with breast cancer risk due to their role in the double-strand break repair pathway and their close association with BRCA1 and BRCA2. Two truncating mutations in PALB2 (Q66X and W1038X), one of which is has not been reported before, were detected in an independent Australian cohort of 70 individuals with breast or ovarian cancer, and have strong family histories of breast or breast/ovarian cancer. In addition, six missense variants predicted to be causative were detected, one in BRIP1 and five in PALB2. No causative variants were identified in RAD51C. This study supports recent observations that although rare, PALB2 mutations are present in a small but substantial proportion of inherited breast cancer cases, and indicates that RAD51C at a population level does not account for a substantial number of familial breast cancer cases.     

Clinical impact of detection of loss of heterozygosity of BRCA1 and BRCA2 markers in sporadic breast cancer.

The development of familial and sporadic breast cancer is based on genetic alterations of tumour-suppressor genes, for which loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is one mechanism of gene inactivation. To investigate LOH of BRCA1 (17q21) and BRCA2 (13-q12-13) in sporadic breast cancer, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based fluorescent DNA technology for detection of microsatellite polymorphisms was applied. A total of 137 breast cancer and 15 benign breast specimens with matched normal tissue were examined. Fluorescent-labelled PCR products were analysed in an automated DNA sequencer (ALFTM Pharmacia). Losses at both loci were correlated with different histological types, age, tumour size, lymph node status, grading and steroid hormone receptor expression, [SHR: oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR)]. For BRCA1 (D17S855, THRA1, D17S579) losses could be detected in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC; n = 108) in 32-38%, invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC; n = 19) in 21-42% depending on the marker applied, but not in benign breast tumours (n = 15). Losses of BRCA1 markers correlated with larger tumour size, higher grade, and PgR expression. For BRCA2 (D13S260, D13S267, D13S171) losses could be detected in 108 IDCs in 30-38%, in 19 ILCs in 17-39% depending on the marker applied, but not in benign breast tumours. Losses of BRCA2 markers correlated only with higher grade. Microsatellite analyses combined with detection of fluorescent-labelled PCR products by an automated laser DNA sequencer can be used for routine determination of LOH. In sporadic breast cancer, LOH of BRCA1 of BRCA2 does not add decisive prognostic value as stated for familial breast cancer.     

Variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and risk of familial breast cancer in a South American population

The double-strand break (DSB) DNA repair pathway has been implicated in breast cancer (BC). RAD51 and its paralogs XRCC3 and RAD51D play an important role in the repair of DSB through homologous recombination (HR). Some polymorphisms including XRCC3-Thr241Met, RAD51-135G>C, and RAD51D-E233G have been found to confer increased BC susceptibility. In order to detect novel mutations that may contribute to BC susceptibility, 150 patients belonging to 150 Chilean BRCA1/2-negative families were screened for mutations in XRCC3. No mutations were detected in the XRCC3 gene. In addition, using a case–control design we studied the XRCC3-Thr241Met, and RAD51D-E233G polymorphisms in 267 BC cases and 500 controls to evaluate their possible association with BC susceptibility. The XRCC3 Met/Met genotype was associated with an increased BC risk (P = 0.003, OR = 2.44 [95%CI 1.34–4.43]). We did not find an association between E233G polymorphism and BC risk. We also analyzed the effect of combined genotypes among RAD51-135G>C, Thr241Met, and E233G polymorphisms on BC risk. No interaction was observed between Thr241Met and 135G>C. The combined genotype Thr/Met–E/G was associated with an increased BC risk among women who (a) have a family history of BC, (b) are BRCA1/2-negative, and (c) were <50 years at onset (n = 195) (P = 0.037, OR = 10.5 [95%CI 1.16–94.5]). Our results suggested that the variability of the DNA HR repair genes XRCC3 and RAD51D may play a role in BC risk, but this role may be underlined by a mutual interaction between these genes. These findings should be confirmed in other populations.     

Breast cancer risk reduction associated with the RAD51 polymorphism among carriers of the BRCA1 5382insC mutation in Poland.

The observed heterogeneity of breast cancer risk among women who carry the same BRCA1 mutation suggests the existence of modifying environmental and genetic factors. The product of the RAD51 gene functions with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the repair of double-stranded DNA breaks. To establish whether polymorphic variation of RAD51 modifies risk for hereditary breast cancer, we conducted a matched case-control study on 83 pairs of female carriers of the BRCA1 5382insC mutation. Cases consisted of women with breast cancer, and controls were women with the same mutation but who were unaffected. The frequency of the RAD51 135C variant allele was established in cases and controls using RFLP-PCR. The RAD51 135C allele was detected in 37% of unaffected and in 17% of affected BRCA1 carriers. Among 27 discordant matched pairs, the RAD51 135C allele was found in the healthy carrier on 22 occasions and in the affected carrier on only five occasions (odds ratio = 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.62; P = 0.0015). This finding suggests that RAD51 is a genetic modifier of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 carriers in the Polish population. It will be of interest to confirm this in other populations as well.     

RAD51 up-regulation bypasses BRCA1 function and is a common feature of BRCA1-deficient breast tumors

The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 encodes a large protein thought to contribute to a variety of cellular processes, although the critical determinants of BRCA1-deficient tumorigenesis remain unclear. Given that BRCA1 is required for cell proliferation, suppressor mutations are believed to modify BRCA1 phenotypes and contribute to the etiology of BRCA1-deficient tumors. Here, we show that overexpression of the homologous recombinase RAD51 in a DT40 BRCA1Delta/Delta mutant rescues defects in proliferation, DNA damage survival, and homologous recombination (HR). In addition, epistasis analysis with BRCA1 and the DNA end-joining factor KU70 indicates that these factors operate independently of one another to repair double-strand breaks. Consistent with this genetic finding, cell synchronization studies show that the ability of BRCA1 to promote radioresistance is restricted to the late S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, as predicted for genes whose function is specific to homology-mediated repair rather than nonhomologous end-joining. Notably, retrospective analyses of microarray expression data reveal elevated expression of RAD51 and two of its late-acting cofactors, RAD54 and RAD51AP1, in BRCA1-deficient versus sporadic breast tumors. Taken together, our results indicate that up-regulation of HR provides a permissive genetic context for cells lacking BRCA1 function by circumventing its requirement in RAD51 subnuclear assembly. Furthermore, the data support a model in which enhanced HR activity contributes to the etiology of BRCA1-deficient tumors.     

Loss of heterozygosity in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions in breast cancer

Background: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the 15q14-21 and 13q12-13 regions can contribute to the inactivation of RAD51 and BRCA2 genes implicated in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. We investigated allelic losses in microsatellites in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions, and their association with clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer. Methods: The LOH analysis was performed by amplifying DNA by PCR, using D15S118, D15S214, D15S1006 polymorphic markers in the 15q14-21 region and D13S260, D13S290 polymorphic markers in the 13q12-13 region in 36 sporadic breast cancer cases. Results: LOH in the RAD51 region ranged from 29% to 46% and in the BRCA2 region from 38% to 43% of informative cases. Eleven percent of the breast cancer cases displayed LOH for at least one studied marker in the RAD51 region exclusively. On the other hand, 44% of cases manifested statistically significant LOH for at least one microsatellite marker concomitantly in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions. LOH in the RAD51 region similarly as in the BRCA2 region appeared to correlate with steroid receptors content and lymph node status. Discussion: The obtained results indicate that alteration in RAD51 region may contribute to the disturbances of DNA repair involving RAD51 and/or BRCA2 penetration and thus enhance the risk of breast cancer development.     

Loss of heterozygosity in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions in breast cancer

Background: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the 15q14-21 and 13q12-13 regions can contribute to the inactivation of RAD51 and BRCA2 genes implicated in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. We investigated allelic losses in microsatellites in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions, and their association with clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer. Methods: The LOH analysis was performed by amplifying DNA by PCR, using D15S118, D15S214, D15S1006 polymorphic markers in the 15q14-21 region and D13S260, D13S290 polymorphic markers in the 13q12-13 region in 36 sporadic breast cancer cases. Results: LOH in the RAD51 region ranged from 29% to 46% and in the BRCA2 region from 38% to 43% of informative cases. Eleven percent of the breast cancer cases displayed LOH for at least one studied marker in the RAD51 region exclusively. On the other hand, 44% of cases manifested statistically significant LOH for at least one microsatellite marker concomitantly in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions. LOH in the RAD51 region similarly as in the BRCA2 region appeared to correlate with steroid receptors content and lymph node status. Discussion: The obtained results indicate that alteration in RAD51 region may contribute to the disturbances of DNA repair involving RAD51 and/or BRCA2 penetration and thus enhance the risk of breast cancer development.     

Use of association studies to define genetic modifiers of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Though much progress has been made in understanding the role of two major high-risk breast cancer (BC) susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, it remains unclear what causes the observed variation in risk between mutation carriers. This marked variability in individual cancer risk both between and within BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier families may be partly explained by modifier genes that influence mutation penetrance. Defining these modifiers should help refine individual cancer risk estimates and is also expected to be an efficient method to identify further BC susceptibility alleles in general. This approach is predicated on the concept that variants in genes that are low to moderate penetrance predisposition genes are likely to have a larger risk modification effect in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Association studies are usually used to assess the influence of variants in biologically plausible candidate loci on the penetrance of BRCA1/2 mutations (i.e., differences in age of onset or tissue-specificity of disease). Several such modifier loci, including the genes AIB1 and AR involved in hormone metabolism, and the RAD51 gene acting in DNA repair, have been proposed in the literature. A consortium of laboratories (CIMBA) has recently confirmed the RAD51 135 G/C variant as a BC risk modifier in BRCA2 mutation carriers, though not in BRCA1 carriers. This review describes molecular epidemiological efforts to evaluate the potential influence of polymorphic variants in candidate modifier genes on the risk of BC conferred by the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.     

Screening of BRCA1/2 Mutations Using Direct Sequencing in Indonesian Familial Breast Cancer Cases

Breast cancer has emerged as the most prevalent cancer among women worldwide, including in Indonesia. The contribution of genes associated with high-risk breast-ovarian cancers, BRCA1 and BRCA2, in the Indonesian population is relatively unknown. We have characterized family history of patients with moderate- to high-risk of breast cancer predisposition in 26 unrelated cases from Indonesia for BRCA1/2 mutation analyses using direct sequencing. Known deleterious mutations were not found in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Seven variants in BRCA2 were documented in 10 of 26 patients (38%). All variants were categorized as unclassified (VUSs). Two synonymous variants, c.3623A>G and c.4035T>C, were found in 5 patients. One variant, c4600T>C, was found in a 38 year old woman with a family history of breast cancer. We have found 4 novel variants in BRCA2 gene including c.6718C>G, c.3281A>G, c.10176C>G, and c4490T>C in 4 unrelated patients, all of them having a positive family history of breast cancer. In accordance to other studies in Asian population, our study showed more frequent variants in BRCA2 compared to BRCA1. Further studies involving larger numbers of hereditary breast cancer patients are required to reveal contribution of BRCA1/2 mutations and/or other predisposing genes among familial breast cancer patients in Indonesia.     

DNA repair genes implicated in triple negative familial non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer predisposition

Among breast cancers, 10 to 15% of cases would be due to hereditary risk. In these familial cases, mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are found in only 15% to 20%, meaning that new susceptibility genes remain to be found. Triple-negative breast cancers represent 15% of all breast cancers, and are generally aggressive tumours without targeted therapies available. Our hypothesis is that some patients with triple negative breast cancer could share a genetic susceptibility different from other types of breast cancers. We screened 36 candidate genes, using pyrosequencing, in all the 50 triple negative breast cancer patients with familial history of cancer but no BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation of a population of 3000 families who had consulted for a familial breast cancer between 2005 and 2013. Any mutations were also sequenced in available relatives of cases. Protein expression and loss of heterozygosity were explored in tumours. Seven deleterious mutations in 6 different genes (RAD51D, MRE11A, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH6, PALB2) were observed in one patient each, except the RAD51D mutation found in two cases. Loss of heterozygosity in the tumour was found for 2 of the 7 mutations. Protein expression was absent in tumour tissue for 5 mutations. Taking into consideration a specific subtype of tumour has revealed susceptibility genes, most of them in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway. This may provide new possibilities for targeted therapies, along with better screening and care of patients.     

Clinical and genetic characterization of hereditary breast cancer in a Chinese population

Background

Breast cancer develops as a result of multiple gene mutations in combination with environmental risk factors. Causative variants in genes such as BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 have been shown to account for hereditary nature of certain breast cancers. However,other genes, such as ATM, PALB2, BRIP1, CHEK, BARD1, while lower in frequency, may also increase breast cancer risk. There are few studies examining the role of these causative variants. Our study aimed to examine the clinical and genetic characterization of hereditary breast cancer in a Chinese population.

Methods

We tested a panel of 27 genes implicated in breast cancer risk in 240 participants using Next-Generation Sequencing. The prevalence of genetic causative variants was determined and the association between causative variants and clinico-pathological characteristics was analyzed.

Results

Causative variant rate was 19.2% in the breast cancer (case) group and 12.5% in the high-risk group. In the case group 2.5% of patients carried BRCA1 causative variant, 7.5% BRCA2 variants, 1.7% patients had MUTYH, CHEK or PALB2 variants, and 0.8% patients carried ATM, BARD1, NBN, RAD51C or TP53 variants. In the high-risk group 5.8% women carried MUTYH causative variants, 2.5% had causative variants in ATM, 1.7% patients had variants in BRCA2 and 0.8% in BARD1, BRIP1 or CDH1. There was no significant difference in the presence of causative variants among clinical stages of breast cancer, tumor size and lymph nodes status. However, eight of the 12 BRCA1/2 causative variants were found in the TNBC group.

Conclusions

We found increased genetic causative variants in the familial breast cancer group and in high-risk women with a family history of breast cancer. However, the variant MUTYH c.892-2A > G may not be directly associated with hereditary breast carcinoma.