Bortezomib,thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND:

This single‐center retrospective study determined the efficacy of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (BTD) as induction for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who were eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

METHODS:

Patients with symptomatic MM who had received BTD induction before stem cell collection at Winship Cancer Institute were included. BTD induction comprised up to 8 3‐week cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11; thalidomide 100 mg daily; and dexamethasone 40 mg on Days 1 through 4 and Days 9 through 12. Stem cell mobilization involved granulocyte‐colony–stimulating factor and/or cyclophosphamide. Response was assessed according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria.

RESULTS:

Review of medical records identified 44 eligible patients (34 patients who were treated in the front‐line setting and 10 patients who were treated for recurrent disease) who received a median of 4 BTD cycles. The overall response rate (ORR) was 91%, which included a greater than or equal to very good partial response (≥VGPR) rate of 57% (including 20% stringent complete responses/complete response [sCR/CR] rate). In front‐line patients, the ORR was 94%, which included a 56% ≥VGPR rate (24% sCR/CR). The median CD34‐positive stem cell collection was 10.67 × 10⁶/kg. The ORR after ASCT in 34 patients who were evaluable for response was 100%, including a 76% ≥VGPR rate (53% sCR/CR). Among all 44 patients, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 27.4 months. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached after a median follow‐up of 25 months, and the 2‐year OS rate was 82%. There were no significant differences in PFS (27.4 months vs 23.5 months) or in 2‐year survival (80% vs 90%) between patients who did and did not undergo ASCT, respectively. Twenty patients (45%) developed neuropathy, including 4 (9%) with grade 3 neuropathy episodes, and 1 patient developed deep vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS:

BTD was highly effective and well tolerated as induction for MM patients who were eligible for ASCT. Long‐term outcomes appeared to be similar with or without ASCT consolidation. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study of maintenance enzastaurin with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus bevacizumab after first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND:

Enzastaurin and bevacizumab have demonstrated synergistic antitumor effects and, in phase 1 studies, the combination was well tolerated. This phase 2 study assessed enzastaurin with 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin plus bevacizumab as maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

METHODS:

Patients with locally advanced or MCRC and stable or responding disease after completing 6 cycles of first‐line chemotherapy randomly received a loading dose of enzastaurin 1125 mg, followed by 500 mg/d subsequent doses or placebo. Both arms received 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin (leucovorin 400 mg/m² intravenously [IV], 5‐fluorouracil 400‐mg/m² bolus, 5‐fluorouracil 2400 mg/m² IV) plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg IV, every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS), from randomization. Overall survival (OS) and PFS were also assessed from start of first‐line therapy. Enrollment was stopped, and the final analysis was conducted after 73 PFS events.

RESULTS:

Fifty‐eight patients were randomized to enzastaurin and 59 to placebo. For the enzastaurin and placebo arms, respectively, the median cycles received were 9 and 10, and the median PFS was 5.8 and 8.1 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84‐2.16; P = .896). Median OS was not calculable because of high censoring (77.6% enzastaurin; 91.5% placebo). The median PFS from start of first‐line therapy was 8.9 months for enzastaurin and 11.3 months for placebo (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.86‐2.23; P = .913). More enzastaurin patients developed thrombosis or embolism compared with placebo (15.8% and 1.7%; P = .008). One possibly enzastaurin‐related death occurred because of arrhythmia.

CONCLUSIONS:

Enzastaurin combined with bevacizumab‐based therapy is tolerable, but does not improve PFS during maintenance therapy in patients with MCRC compared with bevacizumab‐based therapy alone. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Tumor response and progression-free survival as potential surrogate endpoints for overall survival in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer: findings on the basis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials

BACKGROUND:

The authors investigated the putative surrogate endpoints of best response, complete response (CR), confirmed response, and progression‐free survival (PFS) for associations with overall survival (OS), and as possible surrogate endpoints for OS.

METHODS:

Individual patient data from 870 untreated extensive stage small‐cell lung cancer patients participating in 6 single‐arm (274 patients) and 3 randomized trials (596 patients) were pooled. Patient‐level associations between putative surrogate endpoints and OS were assessed by Cox models using landmark analyses. Trial‐level surrogacy of putative surrogate endpoints were assessed by the association of treatment effects on OS and individual putative surrogate endpoints. Trial‐level surrogacy measures included: R² from weighted least squares regression model, Spearman correlation coefficient, and R² from bivariate survival model (Copula R²).

RESULTS:

Median OS and PFS were 9.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1‐10.0) and 5.5 (95% CI, 5.2‐5.9) months, respectively; best response, CR, and confirmed response rates were 44%, 22%, and 34%, respectively. Patient‐level associations showed that PFS status at 4 months was a strong predictor of subsequent survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.35‐0.51; concordance index 0.63; P < .01), with 6‐month PFS being the strongest (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.35‐0.49; concordance index, 0.66, P < .01). At the trial level, PFS showed the highest level of surrogacy for OS (weighted least squares R² = 0.79; Copula R² = 0.80), explaining 79% of the variance in OS. Tumor response endpoints showed lower surrogacy levels (weighted least squares R²≤0.48).

CONCLUSIONS:

PFS was strongly associated with OS at both the patient and trial levels. PFS also shows promise as a potential surrogate for OS, but further validation is needed using data from a larger number of randomized phase 3 trials. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin monotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: Final results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND:

Recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is associated with poor survival. Platinum‐based chemotherapy is often a first‐line treatment. Pemetrexed has shown single‐agent activity in SCCHN and in combination with cisplatin for other tumors. This trial examined the efficacy of pemetrexed‐cisplatin for SCCHN.

METHODS:

In a double‐blind phase 3 trial, patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN and no prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease were randomized to pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m²; n = 398) or placebo plus cisplatin (75 mg/m²; n = 397) to assess overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints.

RESULTS:

Median OS was 7.3 months in the pemetrexed‐cisplatin arm and 6.3 months in the placebo‐cisplatin arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75‐1.02; P = .082). Median progression‐free survival (PFS, months) was similar in both treatment arms (pemetrexed‐cisplatin, 3.6; placebo‐cisplatin, 2.8; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76‐1.03; P = .166). Among patients with performance status 0 or 1, pemetrexed‐cisplatin (n = 347) led to longer OS and PFS than placebo‐cisplatin (n = 343; 8.4 vs 6.7 months; HR, 0.83; P = .026; 4.0 vs 3.0 months; HR, 0.84; P = .044, respectively). Among patients with oropharyngeal cancers, pemetrexed‐cisplatin (n = 86) resulted in longer OS and PFS than placebo‐cisplatin (n = 106; 9.9 vs 6.1 months; HR, 0.59; P = .002; 4.0 vs 3.4 months; HR, 0.73; P = .047, respectively). Pemetrexed‐cisplatin toxicity was consistent with studies in other tumors.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pemetrexed‐cisplatin compared with placebo‐cisplatin did not significantly improve survival for the intent‐to‐treat population. However, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, pemetrexed‐cisplatin showed OS and PFS advantage for patients with performance status 0 or 1 or oropharyngeal cancers. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Progression-free survival as a predictor of overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with contemporary targeted therapy

BACKGROUND.

The majority of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) clinical trials that examined targeted agents used progression‐free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. Whether PFS can be used as a predictor of overall survival (OS) is unknown.

METHODS.

Patients from 12 cancer centers who received targeted therapy for mRCC were identified. Landmark analyses for progression at 3 months and 6 months after drug initiation were performed to minimize lead‐time bias. A proportional hazards model was used to assess the utility of PFS for predicting OS.

RESULTS.

In total, 1158 patients were included. The median follow‐up was 30.6 months, the median age was 60 years, and the median Karnofsky performance status was 80%. For the entire cohort, the median PFS was 7.6 months, and the median OS was 19.7 months. In the landmark analysis, the median OS for patients who progressed at 3 months was 7.8 months compared with 23.6 months for patients who did not progress (log‐rank test; P < .0001). Similarly, for patients who progressed at 6 months, the median OS was 8.6 months compared with 26 months for patients who did not progress (P < .0001). Compared with those who did not progress, for the patients who progressed at 3 months and at 6 months, the hazard ratios for death adjusted for adverse prognostic factors were 3.05 (95% confidence interval, 2.42‐3.84) and 2.96 (95% confidence interval, 2.39‐3.67), respectively. Similar results were demonstrated with landmark analyses at 9 months and at 12 months and in the bootstrap validation. Kendall tau rank correlation and a Fleischer model demonstrated a statistically significant dependent correlation.

CONCLUSIONS.

PFS at 3 months and at 6 months predicted OS, and the current results indicated that PFS may be a meaningful intermediate endpoint for OS in patients with mRCC who receive treatment with novel agents. Cancer 2011;. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Results from AMBER,a randomized phase 2 study of bevacizumab and bortezomib versus bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND.

Newer systemic therapies have significantly advanced the treatment of multiple myeloma, but additional agents are needed. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma that inhibits tumor angiogenesis, a process that has been implicated in multiple myeloma pathogenesis.

METHODS.

In AMBER(“A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo‐Controlled, Multicenter, Phase II Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma”), patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma were randomized to receive bortezomib (1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21‐day cycle) and either placebo or bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle) for up to 8 cycles. At completion, patients in the bortezomib‐plus‐bevacizumab arm could continue bevacizumab until they developed progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS).

RESULTS.

The stratified hazard ratio of PFS for the bevacizumab‐containing arm (n = 49) relative to the bortezomib monotherapy arm (n = 53) was 0.743 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43‐1.28; P = .2804); the median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.4‐8.5 months) and 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.2‐7.2 months), respectively; the overall response rates were 51% and 43.4% (P = .4029), respectively; and the median response duration was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.73‐11.83 months) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.86‐8.31 months), respectively. Frequent adverse events occurred at similar rates across treatment arms, but hypertension, fatigue, and neuralgia occurred more frequently in the bevacizumab‐containing arm.

CONCLUSIONS.

The addition of bevacizumab to bortezomib in unselected patients with pretreated multiple myeloma did not result in significant improvements in efficacy outcomes. The combination was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns for either agent were identified. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

A phase 2 study of irinotecan, cisplatin, and simvastatin for untreated extensive-disease small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of simvastatin in combination with irinotecan and cisplatin in chemotherapy‐naive patients with extensive‐disease small‐cell lung cancer (ED‐SCLC).

METHODS:

In this phase 2 study, 61 patients received treatment with irinotecan (65 mg/m²) and cisplatin (30 mg/m²) on Days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks until either death or disease progression occurred. Patients also received oral simvastatin (40 mg daily) during the course of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was 1‐year survival. Secondary endpoints included the response rate (RR), progression‐free survival (PFS), and toxicity.

RESULTS:

The 1‐year survival rate was 39.3%. The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months, and the median PFS was 6.1 months. Overall, the RR was 75%. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (67%). Efficacy of the treatment was associated significantly with smoking status. Compared with never‐smokers, ever‐smokers had a better RR (40% vs 78%; P = .01), a longer PFS (2.5 months vs 6.4 months; P = .018), and had a trend toward an improved OS (9.0 months vs 11.2 months; P = .095). The effect of smoking on survival was apparent when ever‐smokers were subdivided according to pack‐years (PY) of smoking. Ever‐smokers who had smoked >65 PY had a significantly longer OS compared with ever‐smokers who had smoked ≤65 PY or never‐smokers (20.6 months vs 10.6 months vs 9.0 months, respectively; log‐rank P = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, PY >65 was predictive of longer survival (hazard ratio, 0.280; 95% confidence interval, 0.113‐0.694).

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results indicated that simvastatin in combination with irinotecan and cisplatin did not improve the survival of patients with ED‐SCLC. Although the subgroup analysis by smoking status was exploratory, the addition of simvastatin to irinotecan and cisplatin may improve the outcome of heavy smokers with ED‐SCLC. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Bortezomib-associated peripheral neuropathy requiring medical treatment is decreased by administering the medication by subcutaneous injection in Korean multiple myeloma patients

Purpose

Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN) is a significant neurotoxicity, requiring dose reduction or the delay of treatment. In a multicentre trial including 97 % Caucasians and 3 % Asians, BIPN was shown to occur less frequently in cases in which bortezomib was administered subcutaneously. Considering the different pharmacokinetics between Caucasians and Asians, we analysed BIPN according to the administration route, specifically in Korean myeloma patients.

Methods

We surveyed the prescribed anticonvulsants for the treatment of BIPN and analysed the data after stratifying the results by the cumulative dose of bortezomib. Exclusion criteria were as follows: treated with <2 doses of bortezomib, change in the administration route during the treatment, or receiving anticonvulsants for other reasons prior to bortezomib administration.

Results

A total of 101 patients were enrolled; 60 were treated with bortezomib and dexamethasone, and 37 were treated with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisolone. The median number of treatment courses was four for each regimens. The median exposure to bortezomib for all patients was 19 mg/m². Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were not statistically different between the groups. There was no difference in the proportion of patients requiring medical treatment (p = 0.388). After stratifying the results, BIPN developed less frequently when bortezomib was administered subcutaneously rather than intravenously in patients receiving more than 23.4 mg/m² of bortezomib (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Since the responses were potent regardless of administration route, the subcutaneous injection of bortezomib should be considered in Asian myeloma patients who are expected to achieve a longer PFS with bortezomib.     

A randomized phase 2 study of temozolomide and bevacizumab or nab‐paclitaxel,carboplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma

BACKGROUND:

Increasing evidence shows chemotherapy in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition is a clinically active therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma (MM).

METHODS:

A phase 2 trial was conducted in chemotherapy‐naive patients with unresectable stage IV MM who were randomized to temozolomide (200 mg/m² on days 1 through 5) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 15) every 28 days (Regimen TB) or nab‐paclitaxel (100 mg/m², or 80 mg/m² post‐addendum 5 secondary to toxicity, on days 1, 8, and 15), bevacizumab (10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15), and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 6 on day 1, or AUC 5 post‐addendum 5) every 28 days (Regimen ABC). Accrual goal was 41 patients per regimen. The primary aim of this study was to estimate progression‐free survival rate at 6 months (PFS6) in each regimen. A regimen would be considered promising if its PFS6 rate was > 60%.

RESULTS:

Ninety‐three eligible patients (42 TB and 51 ABC) were enrolled. The majority of patients had M1c disease (20 TB and 26 ABC). The median PFS and overall survival times with ABC were 6.7 months and 13.9 months, respectively. Median PFS time and median overall survival with TB were 3.8 months and 12.3 months, respectively. The most common severe toxicities (≥ grade 3) in both regimens were cytopenias, fatigue, and thrombosis. Among the first 41 patients enrolled onto each regimen, PFS6 rate was 32.8% (95% confidence interval: 21.1%‐51.2%) for TB and 56.1% (90% confidence interval: 44.7%‐70.4%) for ABC.

CONCLUSIONS:

The addition of bevacizumab to nab‐paclitaxel and carboplatin shows promising activity despite tolerability issues. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Bortezomib,melphalan, and prednisone in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND:

In elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), the addition of bortezomib to standard, combined oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) significantly increases the response rate and event‐free survival compared with MP alone.

METHODS:

In this phase 1/2 trial, the authors assessed the dosing, efficacy, and safety of a lower dose‐intensity MP schedule plus weekly bortezomib as salvage treatment for elderly patients with MM. To assess the maximum tolerated dose, 19 patients who had relapsed/refractory MM after 1 or 2 lines of treatment entered the first phase of the study. They received melphalan at a dose of 24 mg for 28 days; bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; and prednisone at a dose of 50 mg every other day of a 28‐day cycle for a total of 9 cycles. At the end of the first phase, based on the good efficacy and acceptable toxicity of this combination, an additional 23 patients were enrolled.

RESULTS:

After a median follow‐up of 21 months, of 42 patients who relapsed, 24 (57%) obtained at least a partial response, 4 had stable disease, and 11 had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 18 months, and the median overall survival was 30 months. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity was observed in 16 of 42 patients (38%) and was more frequent during the early cycles.

CONCLUSIONS:

A weekly infusion of bortezomib associated with lower dose‐intensity MP induced a high proportion of responses and was well tolerated in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib,Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Bortezomib,Melphalan, and Prednisone in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Frailty Subgroup Analysis of ALCYONE

BackgroundIn the phase 3 ALCYONE study, daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) versus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (VMP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. We present a subgroup analysis of ALCYONE by patient frailty status.Patients and MethodsFrailty assessment was performed retrospectively using age, Charlson comorbidity index, and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score. Patients were classified as fit (0), intermediate (1), or frail (≥2); a nonfrail category combined fit and intermediate patients.ResultsAmong randomized patients (D-VMP, n = 350; VMP, n = 356), 391 (55.4%) were nonfrail (D-VMP, 187 [53.4%]; VMP, 204 [57.3%]) and 315 (44.6%) were frail (163 [46.6%]; 152 [42.7%]). After 40.1-months median follow-up, nonfrail patients had longer PFS and OS than frail patients, but benefits of D-VMP versus VMP were maintained across subgroups: PFS nonfrail (median, 45.7 vs. 19.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; P < .0001), frail (32.9 vs. 19.5 months; HR, 0.51; P < .0001); OS nonfrail (36-month rate, 83.6% vs. 74.5%), frail (71.4% vs. 59.0%). Improved greater than or equal to complete response and minimal residual disease (10⁻⁵)-negativity rates were observed for D-VMP versus VMP across subgroups. The 2 most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (nonfrail: 39.2% [D-VMP] and 42.4% [VMP]; frail: 41.3% and 34.4%) and thrombocytopenia (nonfrail: 32.8% and 36.9%; frail: 36.9% and 39.1%).ConclusionOur findings support the clinical benefit of D-VMP in transplant-ineligible NDMM patients enrolled in ALCYONE, regardless of frailty status.     

Combined weekly topotecan and biweekly bevacizumab in women with platinum-resistant ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer: results of a phase 2 study

BACKGROUND:

A phase 2 trial was conducted to determine the toxicity and efficacy of combined weekly topotecan and biweekly bevacizumab in patients with primary or secondary platinum‐resistant ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (OC).

METHODS:

Patients were treated with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 and topotecan 4 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28‐day cycle until progressive disease (PD) or excessive toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS); secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), objective response, and toxicity.

RESULTS:

Patients (N = 40) received a median of 8 treatment cycles. Toxicity was generally mild or moderate, with neutropenia (18%), hypertension (20%), gastrointestinal toxicity (18%), pain (13%), metabolic toxicity (15%), bowel obstruction (10%), and cardiotoxicity (8%) being the most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events. No bowel perforations, febrile neutropenia, or treatment‐related deaths occurred. Median PFS and OS were 7.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0‐9.4) and 16.6 months (95% CI, 12.8‐22.9), with 22 (55%) patients progression‐free for ≥6 months. Ten (25%) patients had partial response (PR), 14 (35%) had stable disease (SD), and 16 (40%) had PD. Patients treated with 2 prior regimens received greater benefit than patients treated with 1: PR/SD, 78.9% versus 42.9% (P = .03); median PFS, 10.9 versus 2.8 months (P = .08); median OS, 22.9 versus 12.8 months (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS:

A weekly topotecan and biweekly bevacizumab combination demonstrates acceptable toxicity and encouraging efficacy in patients with platinum‐resistant OC; further study is warranted. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in patients with advanced, untreated, indolent B-cell nonfollicular lymphomas: phase 2 study of the Italian Lymphoma Foundation

BACKGROUND:

Indolent nonfollicular non‐Hodgkin B‐cell lymphomas (INFLs) are clonal mature B‐cell proliferations for which treatment has not been defined to date.

METHODS:

In this phase 2 study of patients with advanced INFL, the authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of first‐line rituximab, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide (FCR) as induction immunochemotherapy (rituximab 375 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of each cycle and on days 1 and 14 of cycles 4 and 5; fludarabine 25 mg/m² intravenously on days 2‐4, cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m² intravenously on Days 2‐4) every 28 days for 6 cycles followed by a maintenance phase with 4 infusions of rituximab (375 mg/m² intravenously on day 1) every 2 months for responders.

RESULTS:

Forty‐seven patients were enrolled. Among 46 evaluable patients (28 men; median age, 59 years), 19 were diagnosed with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, 21 were diagnosed with small lymphocytic lymphoma, and 6 were diagnosed with nodal marginal zone lymphoma. The overall response rate after maintenance was 89.1% with a 67.4% complete remission (CR) rate (CR/unconfirmed CR) and a 21.7% partial response rate. After a median follow‐up of 40.9 months, the failure‐free survival and progression‐free survival rates both were 90.1%, and the overall survival rate was 97.4%. The main toxicity was hematologic, and related grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 55.3% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

FCR induction therapy followed by a short maintenance phase is a highly effective regimen with acceptable toxicity. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Bortezomib,Melphalan, and Prednisone With or Without Daratumumab in Transplant-ineligible Asian Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Phase 3 OCTANS Study

IntroductionIn the global phase 3 ALCYONE trial, daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) improved outcomes versus VMP in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Here, we report the primary analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS trial of D-VMP versus VMP in transplant-ineligible Asian NDMM patients.Patients and MethodsIn total, 220 patients were randomized (2:1) to receive 9 cycles of VMP (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² subcutaneously twice weekly in Cycle 1 and weekly in Cycles 2 to 9; melphalan 9 mg/m² orally; and prednisone 60 mg/m² orally on Days 1 to 4 of each cycle) ± daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously weekly in Cycle 1, every 3 weeks in Cycles 2 to 9, and every 4 weeks thereafter until disease progression.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 12.3 months, very good partial response or better rates (primary endpoint) were 74.0% versus 43.2% with D-VMP versus VMP (odds ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.99-6.43; P < .0001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) with D-VMP versus VMP was not reached versus 18.2 months (hazard ratio, .43; 95% CI, .24-.77; P = .0033); 12-month PFS rates were 84.2% versus 64.6%. The most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events with D-VMP/VMP were thrombocytopenia (46.5%/45.1%), neutropenia (39.6%/50.7%), and leukopenia (31.3%/36.6%).ConclusionD-VMP demonstrated a favorable benefit/risk profile in transplant-ineligible Asian NDMM patients. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03217812.     

Experience with rituximab immunotherapy as an early intervention in patients with Rai stage 0 to II chronic lymphocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND:

Management of asymptomatic early stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) centered on expectant surveillance for active disease warranting chemotherapy. In CLL, elevated serum β‐2 microglobulin (β2M) levels were associated with more rapid disease progression and shorter survival (OS).

METHODS:

An early intervention trial was designed to assess response, time‐to‐progression (TTP), and OS after immunotherapy with standard‐dose rituximab (375 mg/m² intravenously weekly for 8 consecutive weeks) in 34 asymptomatic untreated early stage CLL with β2M level ≥ 2 mg/dL.

RESULTS:

Long‐term follow‐up and results are reported. The overall response rate in 34 patients was 82% (9% complete [CR]), median TTP in the 28 responders was 23 months, the median time to subsequent treatment was 43 months, and the 8‐year OS rate was 74% (median follow‐up, 102 months).

CONCLUSIONS:

Early treatment with rituximab was well tolerated and safe. Further studies are needed to determine if this intervention can decrease CLL‐related morbidity and mortality. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Race impacts outcome in stage III/IV squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck after concurrent chemoradiation therapy

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of race on outcome in patients with stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who have completed concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS:

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 202 patients with stage III/IV SCCHN who were treated at the University of Maryland. Patients received daily radiation to a total dose of 70.2 Gray (Gy) (1.8 Gy/day), concurrently with weekly carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 2) and paclitaxel (45 mg/m²) chemotherapy.

RESULTS:

There were 108 Caucasian (CA) and 94 African American (AA) patients. The median age was 56 years, and 81% were stage IV. The median follow‐up was 33 months. The median overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) were 33 months and 19 months, respectively. When analyzed by race, the median DFS was 33 months (CA) versus 12 months (AA) (P = .028). The median OS was 44 months (CA) versus 24 months (AA) (P = .071). The 3‐year DFS for stage IV AA versus stage IV CA was 29% versus 50% (P = .031). The 3‐year DFS for N2 disease in AA versus CA was 32% versus 51% (P = .046). The 3‐year DFS for AA versus CA with oropharyngeal tumors was 30% versus 60% (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS:

This analysis documents the inferior outcome for AA patients. They had inferior DFS and a trend toward worse OS. When stratified by several prognostic variables, the mediocre DFS in the AA patients remains. These data suggest that further investigation into the genetic characteristics of SCCHN in AA patients is warranted. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Efficacy and toxicity of 2 schedules of frontline rituximab plus cyclophosphamide,doxorubicin, vincristine,and prednisone plus bortezomib in patients with B‐cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND:

Bortezomib demonstrated promising activity in lymphomas. The authors conducted a randomized phase 2 trial of frontline rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R‐CHOP) with the addition of bortezomib in patients with B‐cell lymphoma.

METHODS:

Patients were randomized between 2 schedules of bortezomib, Arm A (Days 1, 4, 8, and 11) and Arm B (Days 1 and 8), combined with 6 cycles of R‐CHOP. For the first patients (Step 1), bortezomib was given at a dose of 1 mg/m² in Arm A and 1.3 mg/m² in Arm B. For the next patients (Step 2), doses were increased to 1.3 mg/m² and 1.6 mg/m² in Arms A and B, respectively. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete response (CR) and unconfirmed CR (CR/CRu) after 6 cycles.

RESULTS:

Forty‐nine patients were included in the study, and 41 patients (84%) achieved a CR/CRu, ie, 18 of 20 patients (90%) in Arm A and 23 of 29 patients (79%) in Arm B. There were 6 partial responses and 2 patients with progressive disease. Neurologic toxicity occurred in 21 patients (43%) and was grade 2 in 11 patients (7 patients in Step 2) and grade 3 in 10 patients (9 patients in Step 2). Other grade 3 and 4 toxicities included constipation (n = 1), infections (n = 3), and cardiac events (n = 2). Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia and leucopenia occurred in 14% and 41% of cycles, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

R‐CHOP + bortezomib was an effective regimen and produced an 84% CR rate. However, the dose‐limiting neurotoxicity should be kept in mind for further trials with vinca alkaloids or other potentially neurotoxic drugs combination therapies. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

A phase 1-2 study of a farnesyltransferase inhibitor, tipifarnib, combined with idarubicin and cytarabine for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

BACKGROUND:

The authors conducted a phase 1/2 study of tipifarnib in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine (IA) in 95 patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

METHODS:

Induction consisted of idarubicin 12 mg/m² a day on days 1‐3, cytarabine 1.5 g/m² intravenously continuously daily on days 1‐4 (days 1‐3 if age ≥60 years), and tipifarnib, with the first cohort (n = 6) receiving 200 mg orally twice a day and all others receiving 300 mg twice a day for 21 days every 28 days. Consolidation consisted of 5 courses of idarubicin 8 mg/m² a day on days 1‐2, cytarabine 0.75 g/m² a day on days 1‐3, and tipifarnib 300 mg twice a day for 14 days every 4‐6 weeks. Maintenance with tipifarnib 300 mg twice a day for 21 days every 4‐6 weeks was continued for 6 months.

RESULTS:

With a median follow‐up of 33 months, 61 patients achieved complete remission (CR) (64%), and 9 achieved complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) (9%). The median duration of CR was not reached. Median overall survival was 17 months. The most common grade 3 adverse events were gastrointestinal toxicities, liver dysfunction, and skin rash. Compared with historical IA, IA and tipifarnib showed a better CR duration (P = .04) and a trend toward a higher CR rate in patients with chromosome 5/7 abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS:

The combination of IA and tipifarnib is safe and active. Further studies exploring different dosages and schedules are warranted, particularly in patients with poor‐risk AML. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Phase 2 trial of rituximab and bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell and follicular lymphoma

BACKGROUND:

In vitro studies in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell lines and patient‐derived cells have demonstrated synergistic apoptosis with combined rituximab and bortezomib (R‐bortezomib) compared with single‐agent bortezomib. Therefore, the authors of this report evaluated R‐bortezomib in a preclinical model and in a phase 2 clinical trial.

METHODS:

A Hu‐MCL‐severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) model engrafted with the Jeko cell line was treated with R‐bortezomib, bortezomib, or rituximab. Twenty‐five patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma (n = 11) and MCL (n = 14) received 375 mg/m² rituximab on Days 1 and 8 and 1.3 to 1.5 mg/m² bortezomib on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days for a median of 3 cycles (range, 1‐5 cycles).

RESULTS:

R‐bortezomib resulted in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival in Hu‐MCL‐SCID mice. In the clinical trial, the overall response rate was 40% in all 25 patients, 55% in patients with follicular lymphoma, and 29% in patients with MCL. The estimated 2‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) rate was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%‐53%) in all patients and 60% (95% CI, 20%‐85%) in responding patients. Thirteen patients (52%) developed grade 3 neurotoxicity, which consisted of constipation/ileus, sensory or motor neuropathy, or orthostatic hypotension. Patients who were heterozygous for the CD32a (Fcγ receptor IIa) 131 histidine (H) to arginine (R) polymorphism had a significantly decreased PFS (P = .009) after R‐bortezomib compared with HH and RR homozygotes.

CONCLUSIONS:

R‐bortezomib had significant activity in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma and MCL, although an unexpectedly high incidence of grade 3 neurologic toxicity was a potential limiting factor with this combination. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND:

Metabolic imaging is of interest in esophageal cancer; however, the usefulness of initial standardized uptake value (SUV) in positron emission tomography (PET) is unknown in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. The authors hypothesized that initial SUV would correlate with patient outcome.

METHODS:

The authors retrospectively analyzed esophageal or gastroesophageal carcinoma patients who had baseline PET and endoscopic ultrasonography in addition to other routine staging. All patients received definitive chemoradiotherapy. Multiple statistical methods were used.

RESULTS:

The authors analyzed 209 consecutive esophageal or gastroesophageal carcinoma patients treated with definitive chemoradiation for outcome; of these, 180 had baseline PET for additional analyses. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 20.7 months (95% confidence interval, 18.8‐26.3). Patients with clinical complete response (CR) lived longer than those with less than clinical CR (P < .0001). The median initial SUV was 12.7 (range, 0‐51). Higher initial SUV was associated with longer tumors (P = .0001), higher T‐stage status (P < .0001), positive N‐stage status (P = .0001), higher overall stage (P < .0001), lack of clinical CR (P = .0002), and squamous cell histology (P < .0001). In the univariate analysis, initial SUV was associated with OS (Cox model, P = .016; log‐rank test, P = .002). In the multivariate analysis, initial SUV dichotomized by the median value (P = .024) and tumor grade (P = .016) proved to be independent OS prognosticators. Median initial SUV for clinical CR patients was 10.2, compared with 15.3 for less than clinical CR patients (P = .0058).

CONCLUSIONS:

The data indicate that a higher initial SUV is associated with poorer OS in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal carcinoma receiving definitive chemoradiation. Upon validation, baseline PET may become a useful stratification factor in randomized trials and for individualizing therapy. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.