Evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy by immunohistochemistry and multilevel sectioning in patients with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection for evaluation of the presence or absence of metastatic disease is the single most important prognostic factor for patients with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer. Recently, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is being investigated as an alternative to the evaluation of the entire axilla. We evaluated whether the application of multilevel sectioning and immunohistochemistry in SLNs will increase the accuracy of detection of metastatic deposits. METHODS: Between October 1998 and July 1999, 38 patients with breast carcinoma (25 ductal, 5 lobular, 4 tubular, and 4 mixed ductal and lobular) underwent successful SLN biopsy followed by complete axillary node dissection. Sentinel lymph nodes were localized with a combination of isosulfan blue dye and radionuclide colloid injection. Frozen sections and permanent sections of SLNs were examined. All negative SLNs were examined for micrometastases by 3 additional hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained sections and immunohistochemistry with the cytokeratins AE1/AE3. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified surgically in 38 (93%) of 41 patients. There was a 97% correlation between the results of the frozen sections and the permanent H&E-stained sections. Twelve (32%) of 38 patients showed evidence of metastatic disease in their SLN by routine H&E staining. In 7 (58%) of 12 patients with positive nodes, the sentinel node was the only positive node. The 26 patients with negative SLN examination by H&E were further analyzed for micrometastases; 5 (19%) were found to have metastatic deposits by immunohistochemistry. Of these patients, 2 were also converted to node positive by detection of micrometastatic disease by examination of the additional H&E levels. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph nodes can be accurately identified in the axilla of breast cancer patients. Evaluation of SLNs provides reliable information representative of the status of the axilla in these patients. Immunohistochemistry and, to a lesser degree, detailed multilevel sectioning are able to further improve our ability to detect micrometastatic disease in SLNs of breast cancer patients.     

Multiparameter flow cytometry as a tool for the detection of micrometastatic tumour cells in the sentinel lymph node procedure of patients with breast cancer

AIM: To investigate whether multiparameter flow cytometry (MP-FCM) can be used for the detection of micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer. METHODS: Formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded sentinel lymph nodes (n = 238) from 98 patients were analysed. For each lymph node, sections for haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cytokeratin (MNF116) were cut at three levels with a distance of 500 microm. The intervening material was used for MP-FCM. Cells were immunostained with MNF116, followed by an incubation with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) labelled goat antimouse immunoglobulin. DNA was stained using propidium iodide. From each lymph node 100,000 cells were analysed on the flow cytometer. RESULTS: Thirty eight of the 98 patients with breast carcinoma showed evidence of metastatic disease in the SLN by one ore more of the three methods. In 37 of 38 cases where metastatic cells were seen in the routine H&E and/or IHC, more than 1% cytokeratin positive cells were detected by MP-FCM. In 24 patients, metastatic foci were more than 2 mm (macrometastasis) and in 14 these foci were smaller than 2 mm (micrometastasis). In three of these 14 cases, MP-FCM revealed positive SLNs, although this was not seen at first glance in the H&E or IHC sections. After revision of the slides, one of these three remained negative. However, MP-FCM analysis of the cytokeratin positive cells showed an aneuploid DNA peak, which was almost identical to that of the primary breast tumour. Duplicate measurements, done in 41 cases, showed a 99% reproducibility. In five of 14 patients with micrometastasis, one or two metastatic foci were found in the non-SLN. However, in 15 of 24 macrometastases multiple non-SLNs were found to have metastatic tumour. All micrometastases except for the remaining negative one mentioned above showed only diploid tumour cells, despite the fact that their primary tumours contained both diploid and aneuploid tumour cells. In primary tumours with more than 60% aneuploid cells, predominantly aneuploid macrometastasis were found, whereas diploid primary tumours only showed diploid micrometastases or macrometastases in their SLN. Aneuploid SLN macrometastases were associated with non-SLN metastases in five of seven patients, whereas diploid cases showed additional non-SLN metastases in only seven of 16 patients. CONCLUSION: In all cases, MP-FCM was sufficient to detect micrometastatic tumour cells in a large volume of lymph node tissue from SLNs. In some cases it was superior to H&E and IHC staining. Approximately 30% of SLN micrometastases are accompanied by additional non-SLN metastases. The size of the aneuploid fraction (> 60%) in the primary tumour may influence the risk of having both SLN and non-SLN metastases.     

乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移的预测

目的 :预测非前哨淋巴结 (non SLN)转移 ,以筛选出转移局限于前哨淋巴结 (SLN)的乳腺癌患者。方法 :采用99mTc SC作为示踪剂 ,对 95例乳腺癌患者行前哨淋巴结活检 ,对乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移进行单因素和多因素分析。结果 :95例患者中成功发现 91例患者有SLN (95 8% ) ,其中 85例患者SLN能准确反映腋窝淋巴结的病理状况 (93 4% )。临床肿块大小(P =0 0 2 8)、肿瘤分级 (P =0 0 40 )和原发灶cyclinD1蛋白 (P =0 0 17)的表达与non SLN转移显著相关。而Logistic多因素分析证实 ,临床肿块大小、肿瘤分级为独立的预测非前哨淋巴结转移的因子。结论 :可根据临床病理学特征 ,筛选出乳腺癌转移只局限于前哨淋巴结的患者 ,也存在免除腋窝淋巴结清扫的可能性     

Modes of benign mechanical transport of breast epithelial cells to axillary lymph nodes

The status of axillary lymph nodes is a key prognostic indicator available for the management of patients with breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation as a predictor of lymph node status has led to increased use of ancillary methods, principally immunohistochemistry, to increase the sensitivity of the SLN biopsy. So-called "occult" micrometastases detected by such methods have led to speculation that some may have reached the SLNs by benign mechanical transport (BMT) rather than a metastatic process. We review evidence suggesting two potential modes of BMT: lymphatic transport of epithelial cells displaced by biopsy of the primary breast tumor and by breast massage-assisted SLN localization. The biopsy techniques under most scrutiny include fine needle aspiration and large-gauge core biopsy. The evidence implicating breast massage prior to SLN biopsy as a mode of BMT has been supported by statistical analysis; however, no method of distinguishing massage-associated cells in SLNs from true occult micrometastases is available. The significance of small epithelial clusters in SLNs is currently unknown. Thus, deviation from current biopsy and SLN-localizing practices is unwarranted.     

Detection of micrometastases in bone marrow and sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients

Objective: To study the sensitivity and clinical significance of HE-staining,IHC and RT-PCR in detecting breast cancer micrometastases in bone marrow and sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Methods:After general anesthesia, all patients underwent bone marrow puncture and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by 1% isosulfan blue, and then HE-staining,IHC and RT-PCR were used to detect micrometastases. Results:Of 62 patients with breast cancer whose axillary lymph nodes showed negative HE-staining results, 15 cases presented with positive RT-PCR and 9 cases showed positive IHC results positive in bone marrow micrometastases detection. PT-PCR and IHC showed good uniformity(kappa=0.6945)and there was significant difference in detective rate between these two methods (χ2=4.1667,P=0.0412). In SLN samples, 13 showed positive RT-PCR results, while 7 showed positive IHC results. PT-PCR and IHC showed good uniformity (kappa=0.6483)and significant difference was also found in detective rate between these two methods (χ2=4.1667,P=0.0412). Both bone marrow and SLN samples were RT-PCR positive in 3 cases,which indicated that bone marrow micrometastases did not always accompany SLN micrometastases(χ2=0.067,P=0.796). Conclusion: Even if no axillary lymph node involvement or distant metastases are present in routine preoperative examination, micrometastases can still be detected in bone marrow or SLNs. Because the bone marrow micrometastases and axillary node micrometastses are not present simultaneously, combination test of multiple indicators will detect micrometastases more accurately.     

Frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer does not impair the probability to detect lymph node metastases

Intra-operative frozen section analysis (FS analysis) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer can prevent a second operation for axillary lymph node dissection. In contrast, loss of tissue during FS analysis may impair the probability to detect lymph node metastases. To determine the effect of tissue loss on the probability of detection of metastases, dimensions and tissue loss resulting from intra-operative frozen section analysis were measured for 21 SLNs. In a mathematical model, the influence of tissue loss on the probability to detect metastases was calculated in relation to SLN size for various pathology protocols: an American, a widely used European, the extensive ‘Milan’ and the Dutch protocol. For median-sized SLN 11 × 8 × 5 mm (length × width × height), FS analysis led to a median loss of 680 μm (13.6%) of the height of the SLN. Irrespective of SLN size or used pathology protocol, the probability of detecting 2 mm metastases remained unchanged or even increased (0–12.8%). Moreover, the probability to detect 0.2 mm metastases increased for the majority of tested combinations of SLN size, tissue loss and used protocol. Only when combining maximum tissue loss and smallest SLN size in the Dutch protocol, or when applying the extensive Milan protocol on a median-sized SLN, the probability to detect 0.2 mm metastases decreased by 2.7% and 14.3%, respectively. Contrary to ‘common knowledge’, doing FS analysis of SLNs does not impair the probability to detect lymph node metastases.     

Sentinel lymph nodes for breast carcinoma: an update on current practice

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been established as the standard of care for axillary staging in patients with invasive breast carcinoma and clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0). Historically, all patients with a positive SLN underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The ACOSOG Z0011 trial showed that women with T1–T2 disease and cN0 who undergo breast‐conserving surgery and whole‐breast radiotherapy can safely avoid ALND. The main goal of SLN examination should be to detect all macrometastases (>2 mm). Gross sectioning of SLNs at 2‐mm intervals and microscopic examination of one haematoxylin and eosin‐stained section from each SLN block is the preferred method for pathological evaluation of SLNs. The role and timing of SLN biopsy for patients who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy is controversial, and continues to be explored in clinical trials. SLN biopsies from patients with invasive breast carcinoma who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy pose particular challenges for pathologists.     

Update on sentinel node pathology in breast cancer

Pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer has been impacted by the publication of practicing changing trials over the last decade. With evidence from the ACOSOG Z0011 trial to suggest that there is no significant benefit to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in early-stage breast cancer patients with up to 2 positive SLNs, the rate of ALND, and in turn, intraoperative evaluation of SLNs has significantly decreased. It is of limited clinical significance to pursue multiple levels and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry to detect occult small metastases, such as isolated tumor cells and micrometastases, in this setting. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy, who represent a population with more extensive disease and aggressive tumor biology, were not included in Z0011 and similar trials, and thus, the evidence cannot be extrapolated to them. Recent trials have supported the safety and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in these patients when clinically node negative at the time of surgery. ALND remains the standard of care for any amount of residual disease in the SLNs and intraoperative evaluation of SLNs is still of value for real time surgical decision making. Given the potential prognostic significance of residual small metastases in treated lymph nodes, as well as the decreased false negative rate with the use of cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC), it may be reasonable to maintain a low threshold for the use of cytokeratin IHC in post-neoadjuvant cases. Further recommendations for patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy await outcomes data from ongoing clinical trials. This review will provide an evidence-based discussion of best practices in SLN evaluation.     

Lymphangiogenesis in breast cancer is associated with non-sentinel lymph node metastases in sentinel node positive patients

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is not suggested in breast cancer patients with negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsies, and SLN is the only positive node in 40-70% of the remaining cases. To distinguish a subgroup in which ALND would be omitted, we investigated the role of lymphangiogenesis in primary breast cancer as a risk factor for distal lymph node involvements in patients with positive SLNs. 86 patients were included in this study. The frequency of proliferative lymphatic endothelial cells (LECP%) was evaluated in each specimen after immunohistochemical double staining for D2-40 and Ki-67. Larger primary tumor size, increased number of positive SLNs, lymphatic vessel invasion and LECP% were significantly associated with non-SLN metastases in the univariate analysis, but only LECP% retained significance in the multivariate model. A positive correlation between LECP% and lymphatic vessel invasion was also revealed. Our study confirmed the important role of lymphangiogenesis in tumor spread, and suggested that LECP% is a promising predictor for additional axillary lymph node involvements.     

In breast cancer patients sentinel lymph node metastasis characteristics predict further axillary involvement

The aim of the study was to correlate various primary tumor characteristics with lymph node status, to examine sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis size and non-SLN axillary involvement, to look for a cut-off size/number value possibly predicting additional axillary involvement with more accuracy and to examine the relationship of SLN metastasis size to overall survival. Of 301 patients who underwent SLN biopsy, 75 had positive SLNs. The size of the metastases was measured. For different size categories, association with the prevalence of non-SLN metastases was assessed. Associations between metastasis size and tumor characteristics and overall survival (OS) were studied. The prevalence of axillary lymph node (ALN) involvement was not significantly different between cases with micrometastasis or macrometastasis in SLNs (p?=?0.124). However, for metastases larger than 6, 7, and 8 mm, the prevalence of ALN involvement was significantly higher (p?=?0.046, 0.022, and 0.025). OS was significantly lower in SLN-positive than in SLN-negative cases (p?=?0.0375). Primary tumor size larger than 20 mm was associated with a significantly higher incidence of SLN metastasis (p?<?0.001), and primary tumor size over 26 mm was associated with additional positive non-SLN (p?<?0.001). Higher mitotic index (≥7) in primary tumors was significantly (p?<?0.001) associated with ALN involvement in SLN-positive cases, whereas higher Ki67 labeling index was not significantly correlated with SLN or ALN involvement. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in primary tumors was significantly correlated with SLN positivity (p?<?0.001) but not with further ALN involvement or OS. Tumor size and LVI are predictive for SLN metastasis. Mitotic index, primary tumor size, and larger volume SLN involvement are determinants of further ALN involvement. SLN metastasis size over 6 mm is a strong predictor of further axillary involvement. OS is shorter in the presence of positive SLN.     

Minimal metastatic disease in sentinel lymph nodes in breast carcinoma: some modest proposals to refine criteria for "isolated tumor cells"

Axillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast carcinoma. The weight of cumulative evidence suggests that the development of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy procedure has not only allowed for accurate lymph node-staging but has also helped avoid the morbidity of a full axillary dissection in those patients who are unlikely to have metastatic tumor in that location. The detection of metastases in SLNs is facilitated by the, now relatively routine, enhanced histopathologic examination via step-sectioning and immunohistochemistry. In clinical terms, the finding of a metastatic deposit that measures between 0.2 and 2 mm, that is, "micrometastasis" in a SLN is largely noncontroversial; however, the presence of smaller metastatic foci detected either by routine hematoxylin and eosin stain or by cytokeratin immunostain [<0.2 mm, ie, so-called "isolated tumor cells (ITCs)"] has remained problematic since the advent of the SLN biopsy. In this communication, attention is drawn to the broad morphologic range of metastatic disease in SLN that may be placed in the category of so-called ITC. To facilitate the reproducible classification of the various strata of minimal metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes, we recommend the following: (1) the term "isolated tumor cell" (note singular form) be restricted to cases that show the presence of only a single tumor cell. (2) In situations where there are multiple isolated single cells and/or cell cluster(s) present and each cluster measures<0.2 mm, the term "submicroscopic metastasis" be adopted and an actual count of tumor cells present may be given. (3) Restrict the use of the term micrometastasis to cases wherein the largest metastatic focus is larger than 0.2 mm but smaller than 2.0 mm.     

Intraoperative examination of the sentinel lymph node for breast carcinoma staging.

Intraoperative pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) draining a primary breast carcinoma allows an SLN-positive patient to undergo complete axillary lymphadenectomy as part of the same surgical procedure. However, the optimal technique for rapid SLN assessment has not been determined. We reviewed our results with imprint cytology (IC) and frozen section (FS) examination of SLNs from 278 patients. Compared with H&E-stained paraffin sections, IC and FS had an overall accuracy of 93.2%. The false-reassurance rate (false-negative results/all negative results) was 8.4%. It correctly identified 98% of macrometastases but only 28% of micrometastases. There were no false-positive results. Compared with paraffin-section cytokeratin immunohistochemistry results, the IC-FS false-reassurance rate increased to 25.8%. The false-reassurance rate decreased with smaller primary tumor size (T1 vs T2/3) and ductal type, smaller diameter of the SLN (< or = 2.0 cm), and greater pathologist experience. IC combined with 2-level FS reliably identifies SLN macrometastases but commonly fails to detect SLN micrometastases. If SLN micrometastasis is used to determine the need for further lymphadenectomy, more sensitive intraoperative methods will be needed to avoid a second operation.     

Does open biopsy before mastectomy affect the prevalence of so-called axillary lymph node micrometastases detected immunohistochemically

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a previous open biopsy on the presence of immunohistochemically detected micrometastases, particularly single cells, in axillary lymph nodes in patients with "node-negative" invasive breast carcinoma. METHODS: Node-negative breast cancer patients were divided into group 1 (diagnostic frozen-section biopsy with immediate mastectomy and axillary dissection) and group 2 (open surgical biopsy with temporally delayed mastectomy and axillary dissection). Archival slides of lymph nodes were examined and new sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemically with a cytokeratin cocktail to detect micrometastases. RESULTS: Four (12%) of 33 patients had unequivocal lymph node metastases on additional hematoxylin-eosin sections (3 cases) or review of original material (1 case). Immunohistochemical analysis contributed additional data in only 1 group 2 patient. In this case a single strongly keratin-positive sinus-based cell was detected in 1 lymph node. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that previous surgical biopsy of the breast does not increase the incidence of immunohistochemically detected keratin positive cells in axillary lymph nodes.     

Sentinel lymph node investigation in melanoma: detailed analysis of the yield from step sectioning and immunohistochemistry

AIMS: To evaluate in detail the extent to which step sectioning and immunohistochemical examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with melanoma reveal additional node positive patients, to arrive at a sensitive yet workable protocol for histopathological SLN examination. METHODS: The study comprised 29 patients with one or more positive SLN after a successful SLN procedure for clinical stage I/II melanoma. SLNs were lamellated into pieces of approximately 0.5 cm in size. One initial haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained central cross section was made for each block. When negative, four step ribbons were cut at intervals of 250 microm. One section from each ribbon was stained with H&E, and one was used for immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: When taking the cumulative total of detected metastases at level 5 as 100%, the percentage of SLN positive patients increased from 79%, 83%, 83%, 90% to 93% in the H&E sections through levels 1-5, and with IHC these values were 83%, 86%, 90%, 97%, and 100%, respectively. One of six patients in whom metastases were detected at levels 2-5 only had metastases in the subsequent additional lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple level sectioning of SLNs (five levels at 250 microm intervals) and the use of IHC detects additional metastases up to the last level in melanoma SLNs. Although more levels of sectioning might increase the yield even further, this protocol ensures a reasonable workload for the pathologist with an acceptable sensitivity when compared with the published literature.     

Micromorphometric features of positive sentinel lymph nodes predict involvement of nonsentinel nodes in patients with melanoma

The aim of the present study was to determine whether micromorphometric features of positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from patients with melanoma are useful for predicting further nodal involvement in completion lymph node dissection (CLND) specimens. Of 986 patients with melanoma undergoing SLN biopsy between March 1992 and February 2001, 175 (17.7%) had at least 1 positive SLN and 140 had subsequent CLND specimens available for review. Further nodal involvement in CLND specimens was present in 24 (17.1%) of 140 patients. Of 8 micromorphometric features of the SLNs that were assessed, the presence of metastases in CLND specimens was correlated significantly with a tumor penetrative depth (maximum distance of melanoma cells from the inner margin of the SLN capsule) of more than 2 mm (P < .05), a deposit size of more than 10 mm2 (P < .01), the presence of melanoma cells in perinodal lymphatic vessels (P < .01), and the effacement of nodal architecture by metastatic melanoma cells (P < .05). Our results indicate that some morphologic features of melanoma metastases in SLNs predict the likelihood of further nodal involvement in CLND specimens.     

Intraoperative cytologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast carcinoma by scrape preparation

Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast carcinoma allows surgeons to complete axillary lymph node dissection in one procedure if any SLN shows metastasis. The accuracy of intraoperative pathological diagnosis is critical for decision-making. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our rapid intraoperative cytologic diagnosis of SLN through comparing with the final surgical pathologic diagnosis of the corresponding lymph nodes. A total of 454 SLNs from 159 consecutive female patients with a preoperative diagnosis of breast carcinoma over 3-year period were included in this study. After gross examination of each bisected lymph node, a scrape preparation was prepared for each submitted lymph node and was stained by the rapid Papanicolaou method. The intraoperative cytologic diagnosis was compared with the final surgical pathologic diagnoses. The overall sensitivity of intraoperative cytology was 52.5% with specificity of 100%. There were 17 false-negative cases. Of them, six nodes had isolated tumor cells, seven nodes had micrometastasis (0.2-2 mm), and four nodes had macrometastasis (>2 mm). There were no interpretive errors identified. The size of metastasis and tumor grade appeared to be significant factors in detecting metastasis by cytology. In addition, subsequent non-SLN involvement was 9% in patients with micrometastasis versus 50% in patients with macrometastasis (P < 0.05). Our study shows that the intraoperative cytologic evaluation of SLNs in breast carcinoma is a reasonably accurate method. The majority of false-negative cases were due to micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结术中分子诊断的临床实用性初探

目的 探讨GeneSearchTM乳腺淋巴结检测试剂盒(以下简称GeneSearch)在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)术中诊断的临床实用性.方法 对复旦大学附属肿瘤医院2009年2月至6月诊治的88例乳腺癌患者行SLN活检.首先垂直长轴将所得淋巴结切成数块厚约2 mm的组织块,对各切面进行术中细胞印片后,奇数号组织块用于术后连续切片检查,偶数号组织块采用GeneSearch进行检测,应用即时荧光定量逆转录聚合酶链反应检测SLN中CK19和乳腺球蛋白表达的Ct值.将GeneSearch以术后连续切片的诊断为准,与术中细胞印片、术后连续切片的病理结果分别进行比较.结果 88例共获得225枚SLN,其中宏转移淋巴结27枚,微转移淋巴结9枚,阴性淋巴结189枚(其中5枚为孤立肿瘤细胞).从切割淋巴结开始到最终形成报告,GeneSearch耗时范围为35～45 min(平均40 min).基于淋巴结数目,GeneSearch与术后连续切片的总体符合率为95.6%(215/225),其检测敏感度为86.1%(31/36),均高于术中细胞印片[分别为94.7%(213/225)和72.2%(26/36)].SLN转移灶大小与CKl9和乳腺球蛋白的Ct值存在统计学相关性(P＜0.01).结论 GeneSearch用于SLN术中诊断时,其检测敏感度高于术中细胞印片,达到比较满意的效果,但在应用中仍存在一些问题.     

p16 expression in sentinel nodes with metastatic breast carcinoma: evaluation of its role in developing triaging strategies for axillary node dissection and a marker of poor prognosis

Not all patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) in a sentinel lymph node (SLN) have metastasis in additional axillary nodes (ANs). A biological marker that can predict this occurrence may be beneficial in triaging only appropriate patients for AN dissection (AND). Our aim was to study p16 expression in SLNs and to determine whether it is a predictor of metastases to additional ANs and a marker of poor prognosis. We correlated p16 expression in SLNs and ANs of 54 patients with MBC with clinicopathologic features and the nodal proliferative index (PI). We sequenced p16 from DNA in 7 cases. We found that 35 of 54 cases (65%) had p16-positive tumor cells. Nine of 17 (53%) cases in which both SLN and AND were done had MBC in additional ANs. The SLNs of 8 of 9 cases (89%) were p16 positive (73% positive predictive value). Eight of 17 (47%) cases had no metastases in ANs even though their SLNs had metastases. The SLNs of 5 of 8 (62.5%) of these cases were p16 negative (83% negative predictive value). Ductal MBCs were p16 positive in 27 of 37 cases (73%). Carcinomas with a lobular component were p16 negative in 9 of 11 cases (82%). Nine of 12 (75%) p16-negative ductal carcinomas were estrogen receptor (ER) positive. Some 75% of T2 and T3 tumors were p16 positive, compared with 50% of T1 tumors. The highest PI (defined as > or =50%) was seen in p16-positive SLNs (5 of 6 cases). The p16 DNA sequence was normal, and no mutations were found. Our findings indicate that p16 expression in SLNs with MBC predicts (1) increased likelihood of metastasis in additional ANS, and its expression along with other markers and clinicopathologic parameters may serve as an indicator for proceeding to a formal AND; (2) poor prognosis and is associated with larger primary tumors with a high nodal PI and ER-negative status; and (3) histological subtypes. Gene mutations were not responsible for the expression of p16 in our cases.     

Predicting sentinel lymph node metastases in infiltrating breast carcinoma with vascular invasion

Sentinel lymph node and clinically negative axillary node status was compared with well-known clinicopathological characteristics such as tumor size, histologic and nuclear grade, lymphovascular invasion, steroid receptor, and HER-2 status in patients with breast cancer (pT1 and pT2). Positive sentinel lymph nodes were found in 29 of 100 patients: 19 with metastases detected by hematoxylin and eosin staining and 10 with micrometastases confirmed by immunohistochemistry with cytokeratin. Positive sentinel lymph nodes were present in larger carcinomas (P < 0.03), more frequently in tumors with negative PR status (P < 0.037) and evident lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.002). Lymphovascular invasion was also associated with breast cancer of higher histologic (P = 0.011) and nuclear grade (P = 0.039). Tumor size and the presence of lymphovascular invasion were found to be significant predictors of pathologically positive sentinel lymph node in T1 and T2.     

Histopathological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes

AIMS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important component in the staging and treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM). The medical literature provides only limited information regarding melanoma sentinel lymph node (SLN) histology. This report details the specific histological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and highlights some key factors in evaluating SLNs for melanoma. METHODS: From 281 SLNB cases between June 1998 and May 2002, 79 consecutive cases of SLN biopsies positive for metastases from CM were retrospectively reviewed. The important characteristics of the SLNs and the metastatic foci are described. RESULTS: The median size of positive SLNs was 17 mm (range, 5-38). SLNs had a median of two metastatic foci (range, 1-11), with the largest foci being a median of 1.1 mm in size (range, 0.05-24). S-100 and HMB-45 staining was positive in 100% and 92% of the detected metastatic foci, respectively. The metastatic melanoma cells were epithelioid, spindled, and mixed in 86%, 5%, and 9% of cases. Metastatic foci were most often (86%) found in the subcapsular region of the SLN. Benign naevic cells were found coexisting in 14% of positive SLNs. CONCLUSIONS: Staining for S100 is more sensitive than HMB-45 (100% v 92%), but HMB-45 staining helped to distinguish benign naevic cells from melanoma. The subcapsular region was crucial in SLN evaluation, because it contained the metastases in 86% of cases. Evaluation of the subcapsular space should not be compromised by cautery artefacts or incomplete excision of the SLN.