PGD training and its impact on general dentist practice patterns

This study compares the practice patterns of general dentists with and without formal advanced training in AGED or GPR programs. The UCLA School of Dentistry surveyed a random selection of dentists from graduating years 1989, 1993, and 1997 as part of a Health Resources Services Administration (HRSA)-supported evaluation of the impact of federal funding on postgraduate general dentistry (PGD) programs. Using a sample drawn by the American Dental Association (ADA), 6,725 dentists were surveyed about their practice, advanced training, patients served, and services provided. Of the 2,029 dentists (30 percent) who responded, 49 percent were practicing dentists with no formal advanced training in general dentistry or one of the eight ADA specialties; 7 percent had Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) experience; 20 percent trained in a General Practice Residency (GPR); and 24 percent were specialists. Additionally, 7 percent of respondents had PGD training and a clinical specialty. GPR-trained dentists were significantly more likely to be on a hospital staff and to treat medically compromised patients even after ten years of practice. PGD dentists were less likely to seek specialty training. Major reasons for seeking PGD training were increasing treatment speed, learning to treat medically compromised patients, and wanting hospital experience. Primary reasons for not selecting training were starting a practice and having a great practice opportunity. Our conclusion is that PGD training has an enduring impact on practice patterns and improves access to dental care for underserved populations.     

Abstracts/session descriptions from the 20th Annual Meeting on Special Care Dentistry, held March 14–16, 2008 in San Antonio, TX.

William Stewart, DDS, MPH, FAAHD, DABSCD; Paul Goodman, DMD
Osseointegrated dental implants are an invaluable adjunct in treating partial and complete edentulism. In the future, it is likely that older adults, including those with special needs, will require implants. However, according to a 2002 Academy of General Dentistry survey, 88% of general dentists say they have never performed dental implant surgery. Dentistry cannot afford to have its largest base of providers, general practitioners, inadequately trained. There are limited educational opportunities for general practitioner to have a clinically supervised experience to surgically place and restore implants. General Practice Residency (GPR) programs and Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) programs are ideal places to provide this training. The Albert Einstein Medical Center (AEMC) in Philadelphia offers surgical and prosthetic training in implant dentistry for their residents. Since 2002, 53 general practice residents have placed more than 1,000 implants. The Einstein's Implant Program trains residents from an initial placement to an advanced restorative case. The successful AEMC General Practice Residency implant training model could be easily modified for use at other GPR and AEGD programs. This workshop will consist of a lecture and review of cases suitable for a resident training program, including various techniques for teaching basic implant placement. A hands-on training session in placing implants on models will follow the lecture.     

Views of practicing dentists regarding a mandatory fifth year of training

As part of a U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration-funded evaluation of the impact of federal funding on postgraduate general dentistry programs, a random sample of 6,725 dentists graduating in 1989, 1993, and 1997 were surveyed regarding practice patterns, advanced training, populations served, services provided, and their position on a mandatory fifth year of training. Responses (1,965) showed 48 percent supporting a mandatory year and 52 percent not supportive. Open-ended comments were provided by 1,626 respondents. The main reasons for supporting a mandatory fifth year were the need for more instructional time and need for a transition year. Individual choice, no value in a fifth year of dental school, mentoring available elsewhere, and cost were cited in opposition. The following respondents were significantly more likely than other respondents to support a mandatory fifth year: individuals who had completed an AEGD, GPR, or specialty program; were Asian; held salaried positions in a community clinic, nursing home, or hospital; or described themselves as a consultant. Graduates in 1993 and 1997 were less supportive of a mandatory fifth year than were 1989 graduates. Significant differences in the reasons offered in support of respondents' positions on the issue were observed among AEGD, GPR, specialists, and nonspecialists and the three cohort years.     

Characteristics of civilian postdoctoral general dentistry programs

U.S. civilian (non-VA/non-military) Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) and General Practice Residency (GPR) programs were identified (n=208) and surveyed. The assessment evaluated infrastructure support, populations served, services provided, and trainee stipends. One hundred thirty-one programs responded (thirty-two AEGD, 64 percent/ninety-nine GPR, 63 percent). Sixty-nine programs were HRSA-funded (53 percent), and sixty-three (47 percent) were nonfunded. One hundred and five responses identified hospital/medical center resources; fifty-six indicated dental school support. Mean faculty support was similar regardless of program type or HRSA funding. Mean first-year positions in AEGDs were greater than GPRs. Mean first-year GPR positions were greater in funded than in nonfunded programs. A comparison of AEGD and GPR programs showed that residents in GPRs treated more children, medically intensive, economically/socially disadvantaged, and in-patient/same-day surgery patients (p<0.05). Residents in AEGDs treated more healthy adults (p<0.05). GPRs treated more lower fee (no pay, Medicaid, welfare/general relief, Medicare, and capitation/HMO) patients. AEGDs treated more insurance/private pay patients (p=.0001). No differences existed in comprehensive care and emergency visits between AEGDs and GPRs. GPRs treated more hospital-based patients. The mean stipends for GPRs ($32,055) and AEGDs ($22,403) were different.     

Advanced general dentistry program directors' attitudes and behaviors regarding pediatric dental training for residents

The oral health of children became a more prominent concern with the U.S. surgeon general's report on oral health in America in 2000. The purpose of our study was 1) to assess General Practice Residency (GPR) and Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) (here jointly referred to as advanced general dentistry [AGD] programs) directors' current behaviors with regard to pediatric training of residents and 2) to assess their attitudes about which components of pediatric oral health training should be included in AGD programs. A twenty-one item survey was mailed to all GPR and AEGD programs accessed through the American Dental Association website. Seventy percent of directors (N=187) completed and returned the survey. Responses indicated that AGD residents receive adequate clinical exposure to pediatric patients and provide much-needed services to uninsured, underinsured, and underserved people. Although clinical training in pediatric treatment was high, didactic hours focused on pediatric treatment did not seem commensurate with clinical activity. Program directors indicated strong attitudinal support for teaching residents many components of pediatric oral health care, although most directors have concerns over increasing didactic hours spent on pediatric oral health due to already crowded curricula. Approximately 88 percent of directors said that they would implement a pediatric oral health module in their curricula if they had access to one.     

The growth of Postdoctoral General Dentistry programs

From 1972 to 1990, the number of Postdoctoral General Dentistry (PGD) programs increased by 57% and enrollment increased by 131% for a total of 118 PGD programs and 1,367 positions. Although there has been some increase in military and Veterans Affairs (VA) programs, the major increase was in civilian programs. From 1972–78, the major impetus for growth was hospital sponsorship of General Practice Residency (GPR) programs. With federal funding of PGD programs, civilian GPR programs continued to be the main source of growth until the accreditation of Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) programs in 1981. Subsequently, almost all increases were in AEGD programs. Over the 12-year period of federal funding (1978–90), there was an increase of 406 civilian PGD positions to make a total of 925 positions. The increase in enrollment directly attributable to federal funding was 242.
The "unmet demand" for PGD programs was estimated to be approximately 300 positions for 1990, from data derived from the Survey of Dental Seniors and the Matching Program. Assuming that the number of PGD positions continues to increase by 35 positions a year, as it has in the past 12 years, the unmet demand would be met in slightly less than 10 years. if, however, a postdoctoral year was mandated for licensure, the increase in the number of positions would be far short of projected need.     

Conscious sedation in predoctoral pediatric dentistry programs

A survey of predoctoral pediatric dentistry programs in American dental schools was conducted to determine the extent of didactic and clinical training in pediatric conscious sedation. Fifty-four of 59 programs (92 percent) returned usable surveys. The results indicated that there exists a wide range of teaching practices, both in numbers and types of sedations experienced. Fifty-six percent of the respondents reported that students received some degree of clinical experience. Sedation was achieved most commonly with chloral hydrate or hydroxyzine administered orally. Predoctoral programs without an affiliated postdoctoral program were much more likely to practice conscious sedation than those that trained postdoctoral students. The reason most frequently listed for the nonuse of sedation in the predoctoral clinic was philosophical opposition to pharmacological management at this level of training. A majority of the respondents believed that improved monitoring practices and documentation of cases would result from the recent adoption by the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry of guidelines for conscious sedation.     

Maximum cumulative doses of sedation medications for in-office use

The AGD acknowledges that dentists may need an additional permit to perform the procedure described in this article. Many states require dental practitioners to have additional or advanced training in order to perform enteral sedation. In some states, practitioners must have an i.v./conscious sedation permit before they are allowed to titrate (dose) oral medication. The ADA does not believe that oral medication can be titrated (dosed) without an i.v. sedation license. The AGD has adopted and published a white paper on sedation issues, which appeared in the September-October 2006 issue of General Dentistry. The AGD encourages continuing education in sedation modalities for general dentists. Oral conscious sedation (OCS) is an increasingly common practice in dentistry and is at the forefront of evolving state regulations. At the center of the OCS controversy is the oral titration of medications. Most medications available for OCS are used in an "off-label" manner and have no determined maximum recommended dosage for that purpose. This article proposes cumulative maximum dosing guidelines for in-office OCS, with an emphasis on triazolam.     

Use of nitrous oxide and oxygen for conscious sedation to manage pain and anxiety

A 13-item survey of dentist's views about approaches to pain and anxiety management was distributed in Atlantic Canada. Respondents indicated that about 50% had training in conscious-sedation techniques and 20% had learned to administer intravenous (IV) sedation. Sixty-nine percent of those responding had used oral sedatives to help manage fearful patients. Forty-six percent had referred anxious adult patients to specialists or other dentists, and 78% had made similar referrals for anxious children. Seventeen percent reported using conscious sedation, but they typically treated more than 20 anxious patients per year. Most (80%) believed that nitrous oxide and oxygen (N2O/O2) conscious sedation should be included in the treatments that a licensed practitioner can provide, and they were evenly divided in their opinion about the need for a separate licence for its use. However, only half of respondents believed that IV sedation should be included among a general practitioner"s treatment options, and over 70% said that this treatment should be subject to a separate licence. The implications of these findings for curriculum are discussed.     

Dentist use patterns for pit and fissure sealants and topical fluorides

A survey of 2,800 general dentists from six licensing regions was conducted to determine the current rate of pit and fissure sealants and topical fluoride use. The response rate was 56 percent. Seventy percent of general dentists used sealants on newly erupted secondary teeth and 20 percent of general dentists had never used sealants. Sixty-five percent of general dentists used topical fluorides on pedodontic patients at six-months intervals and 25 percent used them at one-year intervals. Dentists with more frequent use of sealants tended to be recent graduates who used new procedures, spent more practice time in pedodontics, came from the central region, had a hygienist in their practice, and belonged to the Academy of General Dentistry. Dentists with more frequent use of topical fluorides tended to perform frequent recall examinations. Those who performed frequent recall examinations were more likely to come from Florida and the Southeast, to believe caries spread rapidly, to be recent graduates, and to have a greater percentage of patients with insurance.     

Curriculum emphasis and resident preparation in postgraduate general dentistry programs

In 1999 HRSA contracted with the UCLA School of Dentistry to evaluate the impact of federal funding on postgraduate general dentistry programs. Part of that evaluation analyzed curriculum emphasis and preparation of incoming residents in advanced general dentistry programs over a five-year period. Directors of 208 civilian AEGD and GPR programs were surveyed about the curriculum content of their programs, increased or decreased emphasis in thirty subject areas, and resident preparation and quality (GPA and National Board scores). Results indicate that curriculum changes in AEGD and GPR programs over the time period have been responsive to the changing nature of general practice. At least half of all program directors reported that their residents were less than adequately prepared in fourteen curriculum areas. Sub-analyses were conducted for AEGD/GPR programs and HRSA-funded versus nonfunded programs. Multivariate regression identified lower student quality as the most important program variable in predicting a perceived need for resident remediation. Logistic regression showed that programs with higher resident GPA and National Board Part I scores had less difficulty filling resident positions.     

Utilization of evidence-based informational resources for clinical decisions related to posterior composite restorations

The purpose of this study was to characterize evidence-based informational resources utilization patterns of a sample of general dentists with respect to clinical decisions regarding posterior composite restorations. A stratified random sample of general practitioners belonging to the Academy of General Dentistry (n = 2880) was mailed a questionnaire that elicited information about practice characteristics and informational resources used for clinical decision making related to posterior composite restorations. Six hundred ninety-nine dentists responded (24 percent response rate). Use of evidence-based (EB) resources (journals and online data bases) was low for all respondents (14 percent) for all levels of experience; however, more experienced clinicians were more likely to use EB resources than recent graduates. AGD Master-level members were significantly more likely to use EB resources than their counterparts (p < .05). Within the limitation of this study, current patterns suggest a low reliance on evidence-based informational resources in the practice of clinical dentistry.     

A survey of the opinions of consultant anaesthetists in Scotland of sedation carried out by dentists

OBJECTIVES: To elicit the attitudes and opinions of consultant anaesthetists working in Scotland, with regard to conscious sedation carried out by dental practitioners. METHOD: A questionnaire was designed to gauge opinion of consultant anaesthetists in Scotland on the practice of conscious sedation by dentists. The questionnaire was sent to 353 consultant anaesthetists working in 49 hospitals within the 15 health boards in Scotland. RESULTS: Of the 366 questionnaires sent, 249 were returned of which 235 were valid. This gave a response rate of 64%. In general, those questioned felt that the provision of sedation in a hospital setting was more appropriate than in general dental practice. A majority (65%) thought that it was unrealistic for anaesthetists to provide all sedation for dental treatment, although many (58%) felt that anaesthetists should take more responsibility in this area. Again, a majority (60%) agreed that dentists should be trained to use sedation techniques for their patients but a significant number (63%) disagreed with the practice of operator/sedationist. CONCLUSION: It is of concern to the dental profession that a significant number of anaesthetists do not feel that it is appropriate for dentists to be administering even the most simple methods of sedation. At present there are no clear, recognised guidelines as to the level of formal training required for the practice of conscious sedation by dentists. It is in the interests of the dental profession and the public to ensure that those choosing to practice sedation do so safely by following recognised guidelines in the training and practice of sedation.     

Dental care for special needs patients: a survey of Texas pediatric dentists

The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of time Texas pediatric dentists spent, as both residents and in their professional position, in the treatment of special needs patients. In addition, an attempt was made to determine the dental services offered to these patients along with the barriers to obtaining care. A survey was mailed to the 334 members of the Texas Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. From the returned surveys (61.9% or 207/334) the following conclusions were drawn: 1) Most respondents had a significant portion of their training program devoted to special patient care, 2) Virtually all reported treating some special needs patients in their professional position, 3) Most provided conscious sedation and general anesthesia and adjuncts to behavior management for these patients, 4) Insufficient financial reimbursement was a major reason cited for not providing dental services to more of these patients.     

Knowledge and practice of behavioral management principles among dentists treating adults with learning disabilities

This study investigated U.K. dentists’ knowledge and practice of behavioral management principles (BMPs) as applied to adults with learning disabilities (AWLD). A postal questionnaire enquired into the dentists’ experience in managing AWLD, utilization of behavioral management techniques, and knowledge of BMPs. The response rate was 41% (N = 53). Two groups were investigated: specialists (dentists registered on the Special Care Dentistry specialists’ list, n = 37) and nonspecialists (dentists not on the list, n = 16). Although specialists treated more AWLD than nonspecialists, both groups of dentists reported they felt highly confident in managing AWLD. However, all dentists’ knowledge of the principles of nonpharmacological BMPs was low. Specialists had a tendency to use a greater range of nonpharmacological behavioral management techniques compared to non‐specialists. These results suggest that dental team members need more training in the theory and practice of BMPs, which might lead to less reliance on costly pharmacological interventions and a clinical experience that is more respectful of the dignity and independence of AWLD.     

Are we reaching very young children with needed dental services?

Recommendations by the Academy of Pediatric Dentistry urging a dental/oral examination of all infants before one year of age, have had limited impact on the profession and the general public. Significant numbers of pediatric dentistry specialists and general practitioners who provide care for children, disagree with the recommendations. Between the mid 1970s and 1990's, there has been no change in the percent of children less than six years of age who were reported to have visited a dentist in the past year. A review is provided of the dental disease needs and dental service patterns of very young children in the various demographic populations in an attempt to 1) increase practitioner awareness of the continuing needs for services and 2) develop a dialogue between the organizations of the profession and the dentists in practice, regarding directions to be taken in the future.     

Life Satisfaction of US-trained Dental Specialists in Taiwan

ObjectiveA large number of residents in US advanced specialty education programmes are foreign-trained dentists. When faced with the career dilemma of applying for US residency training, foreign-trained dentists may wonder whether it is worth proceeding along that path. In addiditon, studies capturing benefits from receiving US residency training are rare. Therefore, this study compared the life satisfaction amongst 3 dentist groups in Taiwan (ie, US-trained specialists, Taiwan-trained specialists, and general dentists).MethodsCross-sectional surveys were distributed to dentists currently residing in Taiwan. Participants were surveyed about demographic information, career-related information, and life satisfaction. Life satisfaction was measured with a structured Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Nonparametric bivariate analyses and multivariable adjusted generalised linear model (GLM) were used to examine the differences between mean SWLS scores and examined variables. We included 134 US-trained specialists, 134 Taiwan-trained specialists, and 134 general dentists matched for age, sex, and marital status.ResultsWith the mean age of 51.4 ± 10.8 years old, specialists had significantly higher mean life satisfaction scores than general dentists. US-trained specialists had significantly higher mean life satisfaction scores than Taiwan-trained specialists when health and family relationships were not considered. Career-rated factors (eg, spending more clinical hours with patients, having more expenses related to continuing education, publishing more peer-reviewed articles, and being a frequent speaker) were not associated with better life satisfaction.ConclusionsUS-trained specialists were more likely to be satisfied with their lives than Taiwan-trained specialists and general dentists. However, health and social relationships contribute more to dentists’ life satisfaction than do career-rated factors.     

Analysis of federal support for postgraduate general dentistry

We compared the funding granted by the federal government between 1985 and 1997 to stimulate the growth of AEGD and GPR programs across HRSA regions, states, and populations. Information regarding the number, size, and location of programs available during the time period of 1985 to 1997 was collected. During this period, although the number of programs remained constant, the composition of the programs changed, with AEGD programs increasing by 113 percent and GPR programs decreasing by 13 percent. HRSA Regions 2, 3, and 5 combined offered over 50 percent of all programs. The number of residency positions rose by 28 percent in civilian programs and dropped by 11 percent in Veterans and Military (VA/M) positions. Overall growth in AEGD positions increased 208 percent, while the civilian GPR positions remained constant and the number of VA/M GPR positions dropped by 30 percent. A higher percentage increase in programs occurred in cities of greater than 500,000 population than in less densely populated areas. HRSA spent dollar 41,254,501 in the thirteen-year time frame, and funding by region varied by over a hundredfold. Programs in the least dense population groups were often the least funded. There was great variability in the amount of HRSA money received by state, with fifteen states receiving no funding during the thirteen years. Without HRSA dollars, it is apparent that the postgraduate general dental training program would not have gained the vitality it currently offers. However, attention must be paid to developing programs among states with a lack of infrastructure in dental education and training.     

Specialist paediatric dentistry in Sweden 2008 – a 25‐year perspective

International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2010; 20: 313–321 Background. Paediatric dentistry in Sweden has been surveyed four times over the past 25 years. During this period postgraduate training, dental health, and the organization of child dental care have changed considerably. Aim. To investigate services provided by specialists in paediatric dentistry in Sweden in 2008, and to compare with data from previous surveys. Design. The same questionnaire was sent to all 30 specialist paediatric dental clinics in Sweden that had been used in previous surveys. Comparisons were made with data from 1983, 1989, 1996 and 2003. Results. Despite an unchanged number of specialists (N = 81 in 2008), the number of referrals had increased by 16% since 2003 and by almost 50% since 1983. There was greater variation in reasons for referrals. The main reason was still dental anxiety/behaviour management problems in combination with dental treatment needs (27%), followed by medical conditions/disability (18%), and high caries activity (15%). The use of different techniques for conscious sedation as well as general anaesthesia had also increased. Conclusions. The referrals to paediatric dentistry continue to increase, leading to a heavy work load for the same number of specialists. Thus, the need for more paediatric dentists remains.     

A suggested curriculum for teaching conscious sedation in advanced general practice programs: GPR and AEGD

Previously published national guidelines related to the teaching and performance of conscious sedation in dentistry have not included guidance in this area for program directors of General Practice Residency and Advanced Education in General Dentistry Programs. A suggested curriculum is presented here for use by program directors of such programs who wish to design training experiences in their own programs or as a reference for program directors who wish to compare their programs with experiences provided in other locations. Guidelines are provided for facilities, equipment, personnel, records and preparation necessary to perform conscious sedation procedures, as well as goals, objectives, and evaluation methodology for training residents in conscious sedation.