Conductive keratoplasty to correct residual hyperopia after corneal surgery

Conductive keratoplasty (CK) is an electrical-current-based technique for steepening the central cornea to reduce low to moderate hyperopia. We report 4 patients who had CK to correct hyperopia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and were followed for at least 6 months. An overcorrection was noted after the CK procedure in all patients, but no sight-threatening complications arose. Conductive keratoplasty appears to be safe and well tolerated after LASIK. However, the algorithms should be modified to increase the predictability of the CK procedure in previously treated eyes.     

传导性角膜热成形术治疗衍射型多焦点人工晶状体植入后的正性屈光不正

目的 评价传导性角膜热成形术(CK)治疗衍射型多焦点人工晶状体植入术后正性屈光不正的临床效果.方法 回顾性病例研究.6例(7眼)植入衍射型多焦点人工晶状体后发生正性屈光不正的患者接受CK手术,手术采用CK View Point Refractec(RCS-200,Refractec,Inc.)系统.随访1年,观察患者远近视力、最佳矫正视力、脱镜率、屈光状态、角膜曲率等指标.CK手术前和术后1年远、近视力变化采用非参数秩和检验.结果 CK手术前患者中位数远视力为0.4,中位数近视力为0.25,平均等效球镜+1.10±0.29 D(+0.75～+1.50 D).CK术后1年,患者的中位数远视力为0.8,中位数近视力为0.5,平均等效球镜为-0.39±0.38 D(+0.25～-1.0 D).CK术后1年,患者远、近视力,与术前相比差异具有统计学意义(Z=-2.226,-2.375,P＜0.05).结论 CK可以安全有效地治疗白内障手术后轻度正性屈光不正,并且能提高衍射型多焦点人工晶状体植入术后的脱镜率.     

Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of residual hyperopia after LASIK

PURPOSE: To report the 6-month results concerning efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of conductive keratoplasty for the correction of residual hyperopia after corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: A total of 35 eyes (26 patients) with residual hyperopia after corneal refractive surgery ranging between +1.00 to +4.75 diopters (D) of spherical equivalent refraction were enrolled in the study and underwent conductive keratoplasty following a modified nomogram. RESULTS: Variables and data were available for all eyes at 6 months postoperatively. A total of 24 (69%) eyes had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of > or = 20/40, and 10 (29%) eyes had UCVA of 20/20. Manifest refractive spherical equivalent was within +/- 0.50 D in 17 (49%) eyes and within +/- 1.00 D in 25 (71%) eyes in cases of previous hyperopic LASIK; the optical zone was significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: Using a modified nomogram, conductive keratoplasty for correction of residual hyperopia was effective, but predictability was not satisfactory and safety needs to be established.     

Diode laser thermal keratoplasty to correct hyperopia

PURPOSE: We investigated long-term efficacy, predictability, stability, and safety of diode laser thermal keratoplasty (DTK) to correct hyperopia. METHODS: DTK was performed on 24 eyes (18 patients). Eight eyes with high hyperopia (mean +4.75 +/- 0.63 D; range +3.50 to +5.50 D) received 12 pairs of coagulation spots at 6-mm and 7-mm treatment zone diameters; eight eyes with low hyperopia (mean +2.25 +/- 0.40 D; range +1.50 to +2.75 D) received eight coagulation spots at 8 mm, and eight eyes with low hyperopia (mean +1.50 +/- 0.46 D; range +1.25 to +2.25 D) were treated to induce mild myopia (-1.50 D) in the non-dominant eye for monovision using eight pairs of spots at 7 and 8-mm diameters. Minimum follow-up was 18 months. RESULTS: Mean decrease in cycloplegic refraction at 18 months was 5.00 +/- 0.38 D in the high hyperopia group, 1.75 +/- 0.19 D in the low hyperopia group, and 3.25 +/- 0.27 D in the presbyopia group. Mean increase in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at 18 months was 8.125 +/- 2.1 Snellen lines in the high hyperopia group, 6.625 +/- 0.744 lines for low hyperopia; decrease of 1.00 +/- 1.85 line occurred in the presbyopia group. Near UCVA in the presbyopia group improved by 3.875 +/- 0.83 Jaeger lines. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was restored by 3 months in all eyes. CONCLUSION: DTK was an effective and fairly safe procedure, with reasonable predictability and stability. Nomograms for laser energy level, treatment zone diameter, and number of spots need improvement.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct residual myopia after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting residual myopia after cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients underwent LASIK for the correction of residual myopia after cataract surgery. LASIK was carried out using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser. In all eyes, the follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: Before LASIK, 1 eye (4.5%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 0.5 or better; 12 months after LASIK, 10 eyes (45.4%) achieved this level of visual acuity and 0 eyes achieved 1.00 or better. Before LASIK, mean refraction was -2.90 +/- 1.80 D; 12 months after LASIK it decreased significantly to 0.40 +/- 0.60 D (P < .01). In 18 eyes (81.8%) at 12 months after LASIK, spherical equivalent refraction was within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia; 11 eyes (50%) were within 0.50 D. No vision-threatening complications occurred. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Automated Corneal Shaper and Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser was an effective, predictable, stable, and safe procedure for correcting residual myopia after cataract surgery. No intraocular lens or cataract incision related complications occurred when LASIK was performed at least 3 months after phacoemulsification.     

Conductive keratoplasty to correct hyperopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of conductive keratoplasty in the treatment of pre-existing and surgically induced hyperopic astigmatism. METHODS: In this prospective, noncomparative case series, four eyes of four subjects, two female and two male (age 25 to 47 yr) were treated for hyperopia (up to +5.50 D) and hyperopic astigmatism (up to +5.75 D) with the Refractec ViewPoint conductive keratoplasty system. The follow-up period was 6 months. Uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, manifest and cycloplegic refraction, and videokeratographs were obtained before and after surgery. We treated two patients who had already had LASIK, one of them with a decentered ablation and the other with flap striae, one patient after PRK, and one patient with keratoconus. RESULTS: No complications were observed. No eye lost lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. All eyes showed improvement of uncorrected visual acuity of 3 or more lines. Videokeratographs demonstrated improved centration and reduction in keratometric power readings. Each eye was analyzed separately, including a comparative analysis of the proposed nomograms and quality of vision after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Conductive keratoplasty may be a minimally invasive solution for patients with irregular hyperopic astigmatism, offering improved quality of vision in instances of flap striae by tightening the central cornea.     

Conductive keratoplasty: an approach for the correction of residual hyperopia in post-lasik pseudophakia

Although there are many formulae for the calculation of intraocular lens power in the eyes with previous kerato-refractive surgeries, unexpected refractive bias still exists. Hyperopic bias is particularly disliked because it affects both uncorrected distance and near visual acuity. Surgical treatment of the residual hyperopia for the eyes with both laser in situ keratomileusis and cataract surgery remains to be a big problem. Conductive keratoplasty has been shown to be an effective, safe and predictable method for low and moderate hyperopia in the pseudophakic eyes or in the eyes with kerato-refractive surgeries. However, the efficacy and safety of conductive keratoplasty in the correction of residual hyperopia after both corneal and lens refractive surgeries has not been reported. Herein, we reported the surgical correction with conductive keratoplasty for cases of residual hyperopia with/without astigmatism after previous laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia and following phacoemulsification combined with posterior intraocular lens implantation for complicated cataract.     

Conductive keratoplasty for low to moderate hyperopia: 1-year results

PURPOSE: To assess the safety, efficacy, and stability of conductive keratoplasty in the treatment of low to moderate hyperopia and evaluate the impact of the procedure on the quality of vision. METHODS: Thirty-six eyes (25 patients; 13 female and 12 male) were treated for hyperopia up to +3.25 D with a Refractec ViewPoint CK system and followed for 1 year. Mean age was 50.2 +/- 8.7 years (range 31 to 71). RESULTS: Before surgery, mean spherical equivalent refraction was +1.90 +/- 0.60 D (range +1.00 to +3.25 D), decreasing at 1 year after conductive keratoplasty to -0.06 +/- 0.80 D, and was within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia in 68% (24 eyes) and within +/- 2.00 D in all eyes. Twelve months after conductive keratoplasty, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 19 eyes (50%) and 20/40 or better in 32 eyes (89%). No eye lost > or = 2 Snellen lines or had induced cylinder > or = 2.00 D. The mean root mean square values for higher order optical aberrations were 0.060 +/- 0.039 before and 0.174 +/- 0.170 at 3 months after surgery. No statistically significant changes in contrast sensitivity were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Conductive keratoplasty for low to moderate hyperopia provided safe, effective, and stable results both in refraction and quality of vision.     

Femtosecond-laser arcuate wedge-shaped resection to correct high residual astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty

We describe a standardized technique of femtosecond (FS) laser arcuate resection (LAR) in which intersecting arcuate cuts are used to perform a wedge resection for the correction of high astigmatism. A simple formula was used to calculate the relative decentration of the arcuate cuts based on the radii of curvature and desired wedge width to be resected. Feasibility of the procedure was established in porcine corneas before treatment of a patient with 20 diopters (D) of post-keratoplasty astigmatism. The astigmatism was reversed. Suture removal resulted in reduction of 14.5 D of astigmatism. Laser arcuate resection can be an effective alternative to manual wedge resection, allowing easier, more controlled, and more precise excision of tissue in width, length, and depth.     

Penetrating keratoplasty and cataract surgery

Of 46 eyes undergoing simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty and cataract extraction, 25 grafts (54%) remained clear with an average follow-up of 37 months. This low success rate can be party explained by the fact that more than 50% of our patients had unfavourable ocular conditions preoperatively. In case of simultaneous procedures, methods of cataract extraction (ICCE or ECCE) did not have any significant affect on the rate of clear grafts. In eyes with favourable ocular conditions preoperatively, the rates of clear grafts were similar (approximately 75%) in cases of simultaneous operation (21 eyes) and separate operation (8 eyes).     

Lamellar keratotomy to correct astigmatism in cataract surgery

Background For the correction of astigmatism in cataract surgery, several incisional procedures have been developed. In this study, a modification of lamellar keratotomy was evaluated to correct astigmatism in cataract surgery.Methods Prospectively 32 eyes of 25 patients with a preoperative astigmatism greater than 1.5 D were studied. All patients were treated with lamellar keratotomy with an incision width of 6 mm and a radial length of 1.5 mm placed at the limbus in the steep meridian. Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were then performed through a 3.2-mm corneal tunnel incision. After 4 weeks, mean astigmatism, mean corneal power changes, and mean surgically-induced astigmatism derived from vector analysis in the central 3-mm optical zone were determined.Results The mean astigmatism decreased from 2.75±0.80 D preoperatively to 1.58±0.91 D after 4 weeks (P<0.001). There were no significant changes (P=0.614) of the mean corneal power. The mean surgically-induced astigmatism was 2.59±1.50 D. The induced changes were more accentuated in superior incisions. In corneal topography, 78% of the treated eyes revealed a characteristic threefold pattern of the mid-peripheral cornea postoperatively, which impaired the corneal optical performance in ray-tracing analysis.Conclusions Lamellar keratotomy effectively reduced high preoperative astigmatism in cataract surgery. This surgical approach was combined with a superior, temporal, or oblique corneal incision.Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft in Berlin, September 2003.     

Photorefractive keratectomy for residual myopia after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correcting residual myopia and myopic astigmatism after cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. SETTING: Refractive Surgery and Cornea Unit, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. METHODS: Thirty consecutive eyes (30 patients) had PRK for residual myopia after cataract surgery. Surface PRK with a VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser was used in all patients. Follow-up was 1 year. RESULTS: Before PRK, no eye had an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better. Twelve months after PRK, 16 eyes (53.33%) had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. After PRK, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved 1 line or more in 14 eyes (46.66%) over the preoperative values, and 15 eyes (50.00%) had the same BCVA as before PRK. Mean pre-PRK refraction of -5.00 diopters (D) +/- 2.50 (SD) decreased significantly to -0.25 +/- 0.50 D at 12 months (P < .001). At 12 months, the spherical equivalent was within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia in 27 eyes (90.00%). No vision-threatening complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Photorefractive keratectomy was an effective, predictable, and safe procedure for correcting residual myopia and myopic astigmatism after cataract surgery.     

Conductive keratoplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Conductive keratoplasty is a noninvasive, in-office procedure for the correction of hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism, and management of presbyopia. It serves as an alternative to laser-based refractive surgery with essentially no intraoperative or postoperative complications. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past decade, photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis have been the most popular refractive surgical procedures to correct myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism. Although relatively safe, flap-related complications often result in undesirable visual acuity. Since US Food and Drugs Administration approval in 2002, conductive keratoplasty has become a promising technique to correct low to moderate hyperopia and astigmatism. The procedure was first used by Mendez and colleagues in 1993. It is a nonlaser, no cutting procedure that delivers radio-frequency energy to corneal stroma in a circular fashion to steepen the cornea. Multiple studies have shown that conductive keratoplasty offers equal or superior efficacy, predictability, stability and safety than currently used refractive procedures to correct hyperopia or hyperopic astigmatism. In addition, monovision conductive keratoplasty has been shown to be successful for the management of presbyopia. SUMMARY: Conductive keratoplasty, an alternative to the laser-based procedure, is effective, predictable, and safe to correct low to moderate hyperopia, astigmatism, and manage presbyopia.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct refractive errors after keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct refractive myopia, astigmatism, or both after keratoplasty. SETTING: Eye Clinic Day Hospital, S?o Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes that had previously had corneal transplantation were studied. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed using the Chiron automated microkeratome and the VISX Twenty-Twenty B excimer laser. RESULTS: Mean follow-up after LASIK was 10.09 months +/- 3.87 (SD). The spherical equivalent refraction dropped from -4.55 +/- 3.66 D before LASIK to -0.67 +/- 1.24 D after surgery. At the last examination, 72.7% of patients had a refractive error within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia and 54.5% had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Vector analysis of astigmatic correction showed an index of success of 54.0%. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was unchanged in 8 cases, improved in 9, and decreased in 5. Significant endothelial cell loss, keratoplasty wound dehiscence, and other serious complications did not develop in any eye. CONCLUSION: The correction of refractive error with LASIK in postkeratoplasty patients proved to be safe, effective, and predictable. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine the method's clinical value.     

Effectiveness of LASIK to correct refractive error after penetrating keratoplasty

OBJECTIVE: Refractive errors may invalidate the good results of penetrating keratoplasty (PK). The Authors evaluate the effectiveness of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the correction of refractive error after PK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients, a 26-year-old woman, a 54-year-old man, a 19-year-old man, and a 51-year-old woman, showed refractive errors: -11 = -4.5 x 85 ; -8, -4.5 = -11 x 95 ; and -4.5 = -4 x = 1200, with a clear graft at least 20 months after penetrating keratoplasty secondary to keratoconus. However, they underwent the LASIK procedure with a nasal-hinged flap of 160 um. No sutures were placed. RESULTS: At follow-up, 24, 18, 12, and 12 months, respectively, the graft remained clear and the endothelial cells were unchanged. The uncorrected visual acuities were 20/50, 20/25, 20/50, and 20/25, respectively with an unchanged best corrected visual acuity (20/20) for all patients. No significant complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK procedure seems to be an effective technique to correct refractive error after successful penetrating keratoplasty.