Sertindole: efficacy and safety in schizophrenia

Sertindole is an antipsychotic drug with affinity for dopamine D2, serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C, and alpha1-adrenoreceptors. Preclinical studies suggest that sertindole acts preferentially on limbic and cortical dopaminergic neurons and clinical trials have confirmed that sertindole is effective at a low dopamine D2 occupancy level. The active substance has a long half-life. Oral administration once daily yields highly stable plasma levels. These features may explain the clinically observed low frequency of extrapyramidal side effects, including tardive dyskinesia. In contrast to most antipsychotics, sertindole seems to be void of sedative effects. However, although not strictly proven by objective neuropsychological tests, this asset of sertindole does not add to the cognitive problems inherent in schizophrenia. Administration of sertindole is more often associated with prolongation of QTc compared with most other currently used antipsychotics. However, large cohort analyses do not suggest that all-cause mortality is higher with sertindole than with, for example, risperidone or olanzapine. The effective antipsychotic dose range of sertindole is 12-20 mg/day, with small variations among patients. The frequency of most adverse events, for example extrapyramidal symptoms and somnolence, with such a dose does not differ from placebo. Three side effects have been more common than with placebo/haloperidol in short-term studies: weight gain, rhinitis and a decreased ejaculation volume. Two head-to-head comparisons (one in treatment-resistant patients) of sertindole and risperidone showed equivalent effects on positive symptoms. For negative symptoms, one study obtained equivalent effects and one a superior effect of sertindole. Sertindole should not be used as first-line treatment for first-episode patients with schizophrenia because of the QTc prolongation. It has a side-effect profile that makes it an interesting alternative for many patients who do not respond well to the initial choice of antipsychotic drug.     

Tolerability of atypical antipsychotics.

Atypical antipsychotics are expected to be better tolerated than older antipsychotics because of their lower propensity to cause certain adverse effects. All atypical drugs have been shown to cause fewer acute extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) than a standard typical agent (usually haloperidol) and some (clozapine, sertindole and quetiapine) appear to cause these effects no more often than placebo. In the longer term, clozapine, olanzapine and (less robustly) other atypical antipsychotics are thought to cause less tardive dyskinesia than typical antipsychotics. Problems caused by hyperprolactinaemia occur less often with some atypical antipsychotics than with typical drugs although risperidone and amisulpride appear to have no advantages in this respect. Other adverse effects may occur as frequently with some atypical antipsychotics as with some typical drugs. Clozapine, risperidone and quetiapine are known to cause postural hypotension; clozapine, olanzapine and quetiapine are clearly sedative; and anticholinergic effects are commonly seen with clozapine, and, much less frequently, with olanzapine. Some adverse effects are more frequent with atypical drugs. Idiosyncratic effects seem particularly troublesome with clozapine and, to a lesser extent, sertindole, olanzapine and zotepine. Bodyweight gain is probably more problematic with atypical antipsychotics than with typical drugs. Overall tolerability, as judged by withdrawals from therapy, is not clearly proven to be better with atypical drugs, although some individual trials do indicate an advantage with atypical agents. Differences in tolerability between individual atypical antipsychotics have not been clearly shown. The tolerability profile of atypical drugs certainly benefits from a lower incidence of acute EPS effects, along with less certain or less uniform benefits in symptomatic hyperprolactinaemia or tardive dyskinesia. Other, perhaps more trivial, adverse effects militate against their good tolerability, and effects such as bodyweight gain may severely reduce tolerability. Without clear advantages in tolerability in patient groups used in trials, drug choice in regard to adverse effects should continue to be on a patient to patient basis.     

Efficacy, cardiac safety and tolerability of sertindole: a drug surveillance

Sertindole is a novel atypical antipsychotic, which has shown efficacy in the treatment of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in phase II and III studies. Furthermore, these studies have demonstrated tolerability and a favourable side-effect profile. In contrast to classical antipsychotics, sertindole was not associated with extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). We report drug surveillance data in 34 comorbid and comedicated sertindole treated patients suffering from different psychotic disorders. The drug surveillance consisted of two distinct phases: inpatient treatment and outpatient follow-up. Clinical global impression (severity and improvement of illness), psychotic symptoms, side-effects, and blood parameters have been carefully documented. With special respect to cardiac safety electrocardiograms (ECGs) have been recorded twice (during sertindole treatment and during treatment with an antipsychotic different from sertindole). Recommended ECG-parameters for assessment of the proarrhythmic risk of a drug have been calculated (QTc-, QTc2-interval; QT-, QTc-dispersion). The majority of patients (n = 29) have been treated previously with several typical and/or atypical antipsychotics. We observed a clinical response to sertindole treatment in 29 patients (85%). Both positive and negative symptoms improved with sertindole and no severe side-effects have been documented. EPS occurred at placebo level. A mean QTc-interval prolongation of 19.7 ms (4.7%) has been detected. None of the patients developed clinical or electrocardiographic evidence of cardiac dysrhythmia during sertindole treatment, or other clinical evidence of cardiac abnormalities. In summary, sertindole did show efficacy for positive and negative symptoms together with a favourable side-effect profile. No evidence for an increased proarrhythmic risk has been found.     

Cardiovascular side effects of new antidepressants and antipsychotics: new drugs, old concerns?

The cardiovascular toxicity of older generation of tricyclic antidepressants (e.g. imipramine, desipramine, amitriptyline, clomipramine) and neuroleptics (e.g. haloperidol, droperidol, thioridazine, pimozide) is well established. These drugs inhibit cardiovascular Na(+), Ca(2+) and K(+) channels often leading to life-threatening arrhythmia. To overcome the toxicity of old generation of antidepressants and antipsychotics, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants (SSRIs: fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, citalopram, venlafaxin) and several new antipsychotics (e.g. clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, quetiapine) were introduced during the past decade. Although these new compounds are not more effective in treating psychiatric disorders than older medications, they gained incredible popularity since they have been reported to have fewer and more benign side effect profile (including cardiovascular) than predecessors. Surprisingly, an increasing number of case reports have demonstrated that the use of SSRIs and new antipsychotics (e.g. clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, quetiapine) is associated with cases of arrhythmias, prolonged QTc interval on electrocardiogram (ECG) and orthostatic hypotension in patients lacking cardiovascular disorders, raising new concerns about the putative cardiovascular safety of these compounds. In agreement with these clinical reports these new compounds indeed show marked cardiovascular depressant effects in different mammalian and human cardiovascular preparations by inhibiting cardiac and vascular Na(+), Ca(2+) and K(+) channels. Taken together, these results suggest that the new generation of antidepressants and antipsychotics also have clinically important cardiac as well as vascular effects. Clinicians should be more vigilant about these potential adverse reactions and ECG control may be suggested during therapy, especially in patients with cardiovascular disorders. The primary goal of this review is to shed light on the recently observed clinically important cardiovascular effects of new antidepressants and antipsychotics and discuss the mechanism beyond this phenomenon.     

Anticholinergics in the era of atypical antipsychotics: short-term or long-term treatment?

Anticholinergic agents are usually prescribed to prevent or treat antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms. Their long-term benefits are questionable and they carry diverse adverse effects, including cognitive impairment and worsening of tardive dyskinesia. This literature review explores the impact of anticholinergic medication discontinuation on movement disorders, cognition and psychopathology in patients receiving antipsychotics. Medline, Embase and PsycInfo were searched from 1950 to July 2011 using "cessation /withdrawal /discontinuation /stopping" with "anticholinergic*" or "antiparkinson*" and "neuroleptic*" or "antipsychotic*". Additional articles were obtained by searching the bibliographies of relevant references. Earlier studies of anticholinergic agent discontinuation in patients receiving first-generation antipsychotics reported relapse rates of extrapyramidal symptoms between 4% and 80%, reflecting the heterogeneity of the studies. Two recent studies of patients prescribed second-generation antipsychotics obtained relapse rates of 4% and 33%. Some studies suggest improvement in tardive dyskinesia with cessation of anticholinergics. Four studies examined the effects of anticholinergic agent discontinuation on cognition and all observed an improvement post-discontinuation. Changes in symptoms of schizophrenia with anticholinergic discontinuation are conflicting, with more recent studies suggesting an improvement. Given their questionable benefit with continued use, clinicians should consider a gradual withdrawal of anticholinergic agents in stable patients receiving antipsychotics.     

Antipsychotic-Induced movement disorders in the elderly: epidemiology and treatment recommendations

We reviewed the epidemiological aspects of antipsychotic-induced movement disorders as they pertain to older patients. The incidence and prevalence of drug-induced parkinsonism and tardive dyskinesia (TD) are significantly greater in the older patient than in the younger patient whereas akathisia seems to occur evenly across the age spectrum and dystonia is uncommon among older patients. The literature on risk factors associated with treatment-emergent movement disorders is highly variable. Treatment practices vary across the age range and the interaction between age and antipsychotic dosage confounds our understanding of the relative importance of treatment-related risk factors. However, there is general agreement that pre-existing extrapyramidal signs (EPS) increase the vulnerability of the patient to developing significant drug-induced movement disorders. Elderly patients with dementia are at greater risk than patients without dementia for persistent drug-induced EPS. Management of drug-induced movement disorders in the older patient requires careful consideration of the contraindications imposed by such agents as anticholinergics and beta-blockers. At present, well-controlled double-blind studies of second-generation antipsychotics such as clozapine, risperidone. olanzapine or quetiapine for reducing the risk of treatment-emergent movement disorders in the elderly have not been published. However, open-label studies of atypical antipsychotics demonstrate a markedly lower incidence of both EPS and TD compared with conventional antipsychotic treatment in the elderly. There is emerging literature in support of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of existing drug-induced movement disorders. More controversial is the use of adjunctive antioxidants in newly treated patients who are vulnerable to drug-induced movement disorders. While the evidence is mixed in support of antioxidants for the treatment of TD, the possibility remains that prophylactic use of antioxidants may help reduce the incidence of TD. The development of a drug-induced movement disorder often reduces the quality of life in an elderly patient. Effective pharmacological management requires cooperation from the patient and family, which can be fostered early in the patient's care through proper informed consent. The risks and benefits of antipsychotic treatment in the elderly patient need to be communicated to the patient and family. At the present time, there is no consistently effective treatment for patients with TD once it develops. Therefore, attention should focus on its prevention and close monitoring.     

药物引起的兔唇综合征

兔唇综合征（ RS）是一种长期应用药物特别是抗精神病药物引起的迟发性锥体外系不良反应。抗精神病药物所致RS的发生率为1.5%-4.4%。RS以口和咀嚼肌的快速、节律性不自主运动为临床特征，发病机制可能与基底神经节的胆碱能神经递质及多巴胺能神经递质功能失衡有关。RS须与迟发性运动障碍进行鉴别诊断。RS的治疗首选抗胆碱药物，部分患者可换用抗胆碱效应强的非典型抗精神病药物。     

Extrapyramidal symptoms with atypical antipsychotics : incidence, prevention and management.

The treatment of schizophrenia changed drastically with the discovery of antipsychotic medications in the 1950s, the release of clozapine in the US in 1989 and the subsequent development of the atypical or novel antipsychotics. These newer medications differ from their conventional counterparts, primarily based on their reduced risk of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). EPS can be categorised as acute (dystonia, akathisia and parkinsonism) and tardive (tardive dyskinesia and tardive dystonia) syndromes. They are thought to have a significant impact on subjective tolerability and adherence with antipsychotic therapy in addition to impacting function. Unlike conventional antipsychotic medications, atypical antipsychotics have a significantly diminished risk of inducing acute EPS at recommended dose ranges. These drugs may also have a reduced risk of causing tardive dyskinesia and in some cases may have the ability to suppress pre-existing tardive dyskinesia. This paper reviews the available evidence regarding the incidence of acute EPS and tardive syndromes with atypical antipsychotic therapy. Estimates of incidence are subject to several confounds, including differing methods for detection and diagnosis of EPS, pretreatment effects and issues surrounding the administration of antipsychotic medications. The treatment of acute EPS and tardive dyskinesia now includes atypical antipsychotic therapy itself, although other adjunctive strategies such as antioxidants have also shown promise in preliminary trials. The use of atypical antipsychotics as first line therapy for the treatment of schizophrenia is based largely on their reduced risk of EPS compared with conventional antipsychotics. Nevertheless, EPS with these drugs can occur, particularly when prescribed at high doses. The EPS advantages offered by the atypical antipsychotics must be balanced against other important adverse effects, such as weight gain and diabetes mellitus, now known to be associated with these drugs.     

Effects of acute versus chronic treatment with typical or atypical antipsychotics on d-amphetamine-induced sensorimotor gating deficits in rats

RATIONALE: Dopamine (DA) receptor agonists disrupt the prepulse inhibition (PPI) in rats which is considered to model PPI deficits observed in schizophrenic patients. Many laboratories have demonstrated that both "typical" and "atypical" antipsychotics reverse the disruptive effect of DA agonists on PPI in rats. These results are based on acute treatment with antipsychotics, which is different from clinical observations since humans receive treatment for months and the effects of antipsychotics only emerge after weeks of treatment. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the effect of chronic treatment with "typical" and "atypical" antipsychotics on the PPI model in rats. METHODS: We investigated the effect of acute versus sub-chronic (3 days) and chronic (21 days) treatment with haloperidol or two "atypical" antipsychotics (olanzapine; sertindole) on d-amphetamine-disrupted PPI in rats. RESULTS: We observed that all three antipsychotics dose-dependently reversed the disruptive effect of d-amphetamine after acute or sub-chronic treatment, but that this reversal effect disappeared after chronic treatment. We confirmed this effect in the same model using oral administration instead of mini-pumps, and in an additional model predictive of antipsychotic action, i.e. d-amphetamine-induced hyperactivity in rats. CONCLUSIONS: The d-amphetamine-disrupted PPI model highlighted a modification in the effects of antipsychotics after chronic treatment when compared to their acute effects, but only the acute treatment can be considered predictive of antipsychotic action in clinic.     

Drug-induced Pisa syndrome (pleurothotonus): epidemiology and management

Long-term administration of antipsychotics occasionally produces persistent dystonia of the trunk, a disorder known as Pisa syndrome (or pleurothotonus). The development of Pisa syndrome is most commonly associated with prolonged treatment with antipsychotics; however, it has also been reported, although less frequently, in patients who are receiving other medications (such as cholinesterase inhibitors and antiemetics), in those not receiving medication (idiopathic Pisa syndrome) and in those with neurodegenerative disorders. Drug-induced Pisa syndrome predominantly develops in females and in older patients with organic brain changes. It sometimes occurs after the addition of another antipsychotic to an established regimen of antipsychotics or insidiously arises in antipsychotic-treated patients for no apparent reason. The condition generally disappears after antipsychotic drugs are discontinued. Although a pharmacological therapy for drug-induced Pisa syndrome has not been established, we have reported that anticholinergic drugs are effective in about 40% of patients who have episodes of Pisa syndrome with the remaining patients responding to the withdrawal or reduction of daily doses of antipsychotic drugs. The characteristics of its development and prognosis indicate that drug-induced Pisa syndrome consists of two types of dystonia. Some patients develop clinical features of acute dystonia, whereas others develop symptoms similar to tardive dystonia. Like that of tardive dystonia, Pisa syndrome responds better than tardive dyskinesia to a relatively high daily dose of an anticholinergic. However, the significant improvement caused by the withdrawal of antipsychotic drugs in Pisa syndrome differentiates it from tardive dystonia. Thus, Pisa syndrome including these features is considered to be an atypical type of tardive dystonia. These clinical characteristics suggest that the underlying pathophysiology of drug-induced Pisa syndrome is complex. A dopaminergic-cholinergic imbalance, or serotonergic or noradrenergic dysfunction, may be implicated. Asymmetric brain functions or neural transmission may also be considered as underlying mechanisms of the development of Pisa syndrome that is resistant to anticholinergic drugs. Idiopathic Pisa syndrome is characterised by an adult-onset, segmental truncal dystonia in patients with no previous exposure to antipsychotics. It occurs rarely but shows a complete resolution with high doses of anticholinergic drugs.     

Antipsychotic medication: effects on regulation of glucose and lipids

Since the introduction of chlorpromazine in the 1950s, antipsychotics have been used for the treatment of schizophrenia. The phenothiazines were followed by the butyrophenones, particularly haloperidol. With all the movement disorder side effects of these medications (extrapyramidal syndrome, akathisia, tardive dyskinesia), the pharmaceutical industry has gradually released atypical antipsychotics. This class includes clozapine (released in the USA in 1990), risperidone (1994), olanzapine (1996), quetiapine (1998) and ziprasidone (2001). However, the rate of diabetes mellitus in patients with schizophrenia appeared to increase with the availability of this class of medications. In reviewing rate and degree of changes in weight, glucose control and lipid levels induced by typical and atypical antipsychotics, it was found that in contrast to case reports, there is a dearth of retrospective, open and controlled studies. However, in studies as early as 1964, significant weight increases were found to be associated with use of chlorpromazine. While the phenothiazines may have some effect on patients with chemical diabetes, there is little evidence of the typical antipsychotics producing diabetes mellitus de novo, or worsening diabetes that is already been discovered. Ziprasidone appears to be the antipsychotic with the most beneficial combination of effects: no weight gain, no change in glucose utilisation and reductions in cholesterol and serum triglycerides (TGs).     

Effects of olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine on learning and memory in the Morris water maze test in naive and MK-801-treated mice

Cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia is associated with functional disease symptoms. The beneficial effects of second generation antipsychotic drugs on cognitive function in schizophrenic patients are controversial. In this study, we investigated the effects of the second generation antipsychotics olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine on cognitive function in the Morris water maze task in naive or MK-801-treated animals. Male balb-c mice were treated subchronically with olanzapine (1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg, i.p.), sertindole (0.63, 1.3, 2.5 mg/kg, s.c.) or clozapine (0.5 and 1 mg/kg, i.p.), and cognitive deficits were induced by MK-801 (0.2 mg/kg, i.p.) administration. Water maze performance was expressed as escape latency to find the hidden platform, the time spent in target quadrant, the mean distance to platform and the swim speed. In naive mice olanzapine impaired water maze performance, whereas sertindole and clozapine had no effect while the MK-801-induced cognitive impairment was reversed by the second generation antipsychotics — olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine at the doses used. These results revealed that while olanzapine had some disturbing effects on cognitive functions in naive animals; olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine might improve cognitive deficits in schizophrenic patients.     

Sertindole, in contrast to clozapine and olanzapine, does not disrupt water maze performance after acute or chronic treatment

Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia are associated with poor functional outcome, and may be further aggravated by treatment with antipsychotics. In the present study the acute and chronic (3 weeks of treatment) effects of clozapine, olanzapine, and sertindole on performance in the Morris water maze in rats was compared, using pharmacologically and/or clinically relevant dose regimens. An experimental design consisting of three trials/day over 3 days was used. Performance was expressed as the distance and latency to find a submerged platform, as well as the percentage of "non-finders", i.e. percentage of trials where the rat was unable to find the platform within the total trial time of 60 s. Clozapine (40 mg/kg, p.o.) and olanzapine (2.5 mg/kg, s.c.) impaired water maze performance when given acutely. However, tolerance developed to the deficit induced by clozapine, whereas the olanzapine-mediated impairment was enhanced after chronic treatment. Sertindole (2.5 mg/kg, p.o.) had no disruptive effect on performance after either acute or chronic treatment. Exposure measurements confirmed that all three compounds were present in the serum at least at clinically effective concentrations. Thus, the three antipsychotics tested differentially affected rodent cognition, whereby sertindole appeared to have a lower potential than either clozapine or olanzapine to induce cognitive impairment. The hypothesis that the low potency of sertindole in inducing dopamine D2 receptor blockade, combined with lack of antimuscarinic and histamine H1 antagonist activity in vivo is discussed. Clearly further studies are needed to assess the potential cognition-enhancing effects of sertindole vs. other antipsychotics in a relevant animal model of schizophrenia.     

Current therapy issues and unmet clinical needs in the treatment of schizophrenia: a review of the new generation antipsychotics

This review discusses the atypical antipsychotics, focusing on the possibility of symptom reduction with a minimum of side-effects. A selective review of clinically relevant reports, studies and meta-analyses is presented. The results from clinical trials suggest that atypical agents improve negative and affective symptoms, and cognitive functioning more than typical antipsychotics, but that the pattern of effects on these domains, as well as on suicidality, appears to differ. In clinical trials, the newer drugs generally have less extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS) than typical antipsychotics. However, amisulpride, risperidone, olanzapine and ziprasidone still show evidence of a dose-related increase in EPS, whereas clozapine, quetiapine, sertindole and aripiprazole do not. Weight gain, increased blood lipids/cholesterol, and insulin resistance/type 2 diabetes are emerging as significant treatment-associated concerns, particularly for clozapine and olanzapine. Sedation has been reported for all the newer compounds except sertindole. The considerable variation in benefit/risk profiles of the atypical compounds can help the clinician to select the most appropriate treatment for individual patients.     

Daytime sleepiness and EEG abnormalities in patients treated with second generation antipsychotic agents

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to verify whether or not an increased prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) or EEG abnormalities is observed in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), and to compare the effects of second generation antipsychotics (SGA) on patients’ daytime sleepiness level and EEG recordings.MethodsEEG recordings and self-reports of EDS, assessed with Epworth (ESS) and Stanford (SSS) Sleepiness Scales, were compared between 244 patients with SSD and 82 patients with anxiety, personality or behavioral disorders (non-psychotic disorders, NPD). To examine the effects of various SGA, patients treated in monotherapy with aripiprazole, olanzapine, clozapine, risperidone and sertindole were compared.ResultsA higher prevalence of abnormal EEG recordings was observed in SSD patients. No significant differences in average daytime sleepiness were found between patients with SSD and NPD; however, patients with SSD had longer sleep duration. Aripiprazole treatment was associated with significantly smaller and less frequent EEG abnormalities than treatment with any other SGA, while treatment with clozapine and olanzapine was related to an increased prevalence of severe EEG abnormalities. Patients with SSD treated with SGA in monotherapy were less sleepy than unmedicated patients with NPD.ConclusionsAlthough antipsychotics may have profound effects on EEG patients with schizophrenia do not have higher daytime sleepiness than patients with anxiety/personality disorders. Patients with schizophrenia may compensate sedative effects of antipsychotic treatment with sleep duration prolongation and report even less sleepiness than non-psychotic patients.     

Managing antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia.

Antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia is a common and clinically significant hazard of long term antipsychotic therapy. The arrival of atypical antipsychotics has markedly improved the outlook: atypical antipsychotics are emerging as effective treatments and may also reduce the prevalence and incidence of tardive dyskinesia. In mild cases, careful monitoring of tardive dyskinesia by serial Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale (AIMS) assessments may be the appropriate course. More severe tardive dyskinesia calls for intervention in order to treat the dyskinesia. Atypical antipsychotics and tocopherol (vitamin E) are effective and generally well tolerated treatment options for tardive dyskinesia. Tardive dyskinesia variants such as tardive dystonia and tardive akathisia tend to be more severe and difficult to treat compared with typical tardive dyskinesia. Prevention of tardive dyskinesia is possible through careful selection of patients for antipsychotic therapy, use of the lowest effective antipsychotic dosages, use of atypical rather than traditional antipsychotics and concurrent tocopherol administration. The clinician can now undertake the management of tardive dyskinesia with growing confidence.     

Atypical antipsychotic agents: a critical review.

The pharmacology, efficacy, and adverse effects of atypical antipsychotic agents when used to treat schizophrenia and other disorders are reviewed. Atypical antipsychotic agents were developed in response to problems with typical agents, including lack of efficacy in some patients, lack of improvement in negative symptoms, and troublesome adverse effects, especially extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs) and tardive dyskinesia CTD). Atypical antipsychotics differ from typical psychotics in their "limbic-specific" dopamine type 2 (D2)-receptor binding and high ratio of serotonin type 2 (5-HT2)-receptor binding to D2 binding. In clinical trials in patients with non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia, risperidone and olanzapine were superior to placebo for positive and negative symptoms. Risperidone and olanzapine were superior to haloperidol on some measures. Quetiapine was better than placebo but was not better than typical antipsychotics. Head-to-head comparisons of atypical antipsychotics in non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia have been inconclusive. Clozapine remains the standard agent for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Atypical agents are substantially more expensive than their typical antipsychotic counterparts. To fully determine the overall efficiency of these drugs, other potential benefits, such as improved quality of life, need to be factored in. Atypical antipsychotics are associated with a decreased capacity to cause EPSs, TD, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and hyperprolactinemia. Clozapine carries a risk of agranulocytosis; the white blood cell count must be monitored. Atypical antipsychotics are increasingly being used for indications other than schizophrenia, such as the management of aggression, mania, and depression. Atypical antipsychotics are often considered first-line agents for treating schizophrenia and are promising treatment alternatives for other psychiatric and neurologic conditions.     

Effects of olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine on MK-801 induced visual memory deficits in mice

We investigated the effects of the second generation antipsychotics olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine on visual recognition memory using the novel object recognition (NOR) test in naive and MK-801-treated animals. The effects of drug treatment on locomotion and anxiety were also determined using the open field test.Male Balb-c mice were treated with olanzapine (0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg; i.p.), sertindole (0.63, 1.3 and 2.5 mg/kg; s.c.) or clozapine (0.5 and 1 mg/kg; i.p.), and cognitive deficits were induced by MK-801 (0.2 mg/kg; i.p.) administration. Olanzapine treatment decreased the ratio index in the NOR test, whereas sertindole and clozapine had no effect in naive mice. MK-801-induced cognitive impairment was reversed by treatment with olanzapine, sertindole or clozapine. While olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine had no effect on the anxiety of naive mice as determined by the open field test, MK-801 significantly increased the total distance traveled, time spent in the center zone and the velocity of the animals. MK-801-induced effects on locomotion and anxiety in the open field test were reversed by olanzapine, sertindole or clozapine treatment. The results of the present study demonstrated that olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine improved cognition in MK-801 treated mice, and indicate that these drugs have a potential to improve cognition in schizophrenia.     

Atypical antipsychotic drugs: current issues of safety and efficacy in the management of schizophrenia

This review focuses on the comparative safety and efficacy profile of nine atypical antipsychotic drugs (amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone and zotepine), which may ultimately affect the therapeutic options available for patients with schizophrenia. These antipsychotic compounds differ markedly in their potential to impact a number of quality-of-life measures. Furthermore, their differential effects on anxiety disorders, treatment-resistant depressive illness, cognitive functions and manic disorders may influence the selection of atypical antipsychotics for conditions associated with schizophrenia. The possible relevance of these parameters in evaluating the risk/benefit equation and probable involvement of varying receptor mechanisms is also discussed.     

A review of atypical antipsychotic drugs versus conventional medication in schizophrenia

Atypical antipsychotics are replacing conventional antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia. They are considered to be at least as effective as conventional agents, with most producing fewer extrapyramidal symptoms. This review presents the evidence from published meta-analyses and describes differences in clinical effectiveness and tolerability between conventional and atypical antipsychotic agents. In addition, it discusses some of the more significant adverse effects including tardive dyskinesia, weight gain, diabetes and sudden death. Results from meta-analyses are conflicting, with some finding no significant advantages on measures of efficacy or tolerability for atypical antipsychotics over moderate daily doses of conventional drugs. Other results have shown that some atypical drugs have at least minor efficacy advantages over conventional comparators. Atypical antipsychotics exhibit a much reduced risk for tardive dyskinesia compared with conventional drugs. However, weight gain is more common with some atypical drugs (especially clozapine and olanzapine). Both conventional and atypical antipsychotics have been associated with diabetes, with most reports implicating both clozapine and olanzapine. Finally, atypical antipsychotics (unlike conventional drugs) have little or no effect on QT and are not associated with sudden death.