Osteomyelitis: diagnosis with In-111-labeled leukocytes

In a retrospective review, 485 patients with suspected osteomyelitis were studied. Of these, 453 patients were studied with both bone and indium-111 leukocyte scanning (173 sequentially and 280 simultaneously). The ability to determine that the infection was in bone rather than in adjacent soft tissue was greater with simultaneous bone scan and In-111 leukocyte studies than with sequential studies. The locations of suspected osteomyelitis were divided into central (containing active bone marrow), peripheral (hands and feet), and middle (between central and peripheral). Specificity remained high (about 90%) regardless of the location. Overall sensitivity was significantly lower in the central location than in the peripheral or middle location. Determination of whether the In-111 leukocyte activity was in bone or adjacent soft tissue was also more difficult when the infection was in the central location. For acute osteomyelitis, sensitivity was high regardless of the location. For chronic osteomyelitis, sensitivity was lower in the central location.     

Indium-111-leukocyte/technetium-99m-MDP bone and magnetic resonance imaging: difficulty of diagnosing osteomyelitis in patients with neuropathic osteoarthropathy

Fourteen patients (16 sites) with clinical and/or radiographic evidence of neuropathic osteoarthropathy (Charcot joints) were evaluated with combined indium-111-leukocyte (111In-WBC) and technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) bone imaging for suspected osteomyelitis. Magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained in seven patients. Using a positive bone culture as the criterion for the presence of osteomyelitis, there were four true-positive studies, six true-negative sites, and one false-negative 111In-WBC study. Five of 16 sites (31%) had false-positive 111In-WBC uptake at noninfected sites. There were four true-positive and three false-positive MR studies. All false-positives showed at least moderately abnormal findings by both techniques at sites of rapidly progressing osteoarthropathy of recent onset. In this preliminary study, both techniques appear to be sensitive for detection of osteomyelitis, and a negative study makes osteomyelitis unlikely. However, the findings of 111In-WBC/99mTc-MDP and MR images at sites of rapidly progressing, noninfected neuropathic osteoarthropathy may be indistinguishable from those of osteomyelitis.     

Infection in diabetic osteoarthropathy: use of indium-labeled leukocytes for diagnosis

Indium-111 labeled leukocyte imaging was compared with three-phase skeletal scintigraphy as a means of determining whether osteomyelitis was complicating diabetic osteoarthropathy. Three-phase scintigraphy demonstrated increased activity in both infected and noninfected osteopathic bone, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 56% for osteomyelitis. Leukocyte imaging had the same sensitivity but was most helpful for excluding infection (specificity, 89%) when three-phase imaging could not. Abnormal leukocyte localization was seen at the primary site of infection in all cases within 4 hours after injection. Disadvantages of leukocyte imaging included long preparation time, low count rates resulting in poor spatial resolution, and absence of bone landmarks, which made it difficult to differentiate soft tissue from bone infection.     

Radionuclide imaging of musculoskeletal infection: conventional agents

The diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection can be clinically challenging, and radionuclide imaging is often performed as part of the diagnostic workup. Conventional studies include bone scan, gallium imaging, and labeled leukocyte imaging. No single test is equally efficacious in all situations, and thus the procedure(s) performed should be optimized for the individual patient. Three-phase bone imaging, readily available and relatively inexpensive, is very accurate in unviolated bone. In the setting of underlying osseous abnormalities, however, the specificity of the test decreases. Four-phase bone, sequential bone/gallium, and labeled leukocyte imaging all have been used in an effort to enhance specificity. Labeled leukocyte imaging is the radionuclide procedure of choice for diagnosing so-called complicating osteomyelitis such as infected joint prostheses, diabetic pedal osteomyelitis, and infection of the neuropathic joint. To maximize the accuracy of the study, complementary bone marrow imaging often must be performed. Labeled leukocyte imaging is of limited value in spinal osteomyelitis, however, because this entity often presents as a nonspecific photopenic defect on white cell studies. The conventional radionuclide study for evaluating spinal osteomyelitis is gallium imaging, which should be performed regardless of the findings on a contemporaneous bone scan. The reasons for this are as follows: Gallium improves the specificity of the bone scan; gallium detects accompanying soft tissue infection, whereas the bone scan does not, and gallium may be more sensitive than the bone scan in elderly patients.     

Detection of deep venous thrombosis by indium-111 leukocyte scintigraphy

Indium-111-labeled leukocyte ([111In]WBC) scintigraphy has been used successfully for detection of inflammation. Occasionally, noninflammatory collections of white blood cells such as hematomas or hemorrhage have been localized. We report a case in which unsuspected femoral deep venous thrombosis was diagnosed on an [111In]WBC leukocyte scan performed for detection of osteomyelitis. Readers are advised to avoid interpreting all vascular [111In]WBC localization as necessarily infectious. This may be of particular significance in patients with vascular grafts.     

The diabetic foot: Charcot joint and osteomyelitis

Foot problems are common causes of disability in diabetic patients with as many as 25% expected to develop severe foot or leg problems during their lifetimes. Although skin ulceration is the most frequent problem, bones may also be involved in two different clinical conditions: osteomyelitis and Charcot osteoarthropathy. Osteomyelitis causes complications in up to one third of diabetic foot infections and is due to direct contamination from a soft-tissue ulcer. Osteoarthropathy Charcot foot is a chronic and progressive disease of the bone and joints. Both osteomyelitis and Charcot joint are conditions with an increased risk of lower limb amputation, both may have a successful outcome when recognized and treated in the early stages. The major diagnostic difficulty is in distinguishing bone infection (osteomyelitis) from non-infectious neuropathic bony disorders as in osteoarthropathy Charcot foot. An additional difficulty is found when a bone infection superimposes a Charcot osteopathy. This condition, which can be clinically suspected when foot ulceration appears in Charcot foot, needs to be diagnosed because it implies a different therapeutic strategy. This article aims to summarize both these two clinical conditions and give indications to make a timely and correct diagnosis.     

Combined leukocyte and bone imaging used to evaluate diabetic osteoarthropathy and osteomyelitis

Six diabetic patients with roentgenographic finding of osteomyelitis, osteoarthropathy, or both, had combined leukocyte and bone imaging. Bone images demonstrated increased activity in all cases, including three without osteomyelitis. Leukocyte images, however, showed increased activity in only the three cases of osteomyelitis. There was minimal or no activity in the other three cases where osteoarthropathy was ultimately believed to be the basis of the roentgenographic and bone imaging changes.     

The diabetic foot: initial experience with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Osteomyelitis complicates up to one third of diabetic foot infections, is often due to direct contamination from a soft-tissue lesion, and represents a clinical challenge. Early diagnosis is important since antibiotic therapy can be curative and may prevent amputation. The present study assessed the role of PET/CT using 18F-FDG for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. METHODS: Fourteen diabetic patients (10 men and 4 women; age range, 29-70 y) with 18 clinically suspected sites of infection underwent PET/CT after the injection of 185-370 MBq of 18F-FDG for suspected osteomyelitis complicating diabetic foot disease. PET, CT, and hybrid images were independently evaluated for the diagnosis and localization of an infectious process. Additional data provided by PET/CT for localization of infection in the bone or soft tissues were recorded. The final diagnosis was based on histopathologic findings and bacteriologic assays obtained at surgery or at clinical and imaging follow-up. RESULTS: PET detected 14 foci of increased 18F-FDG uptake suspected as infection in 10 patients. PET/CT correctly localized 8 foci in 4 patients to bone, indicating osteomyelitis. PET/CT correctly excluded osteomyelitis in 5 foci in 5 patients, with the abnormal 18F-FDG uptake limited to infected soft tissues only. One site of mildly increased focal 18F-FDG uptake was localized by PET/CT to diabetic osteoarthropathy changes demonstrated on CT. Four patients showed no abnormally increased 18F-FDG uptake and no further evidence of an infectious process on clinical and imaging follow-up. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET can be used for diagnosis of diabetes-related infection. The precise anatomic localization of increased 18F-FDG uptake provided by PET/CT enables accurate differentiation between osteomyelitis and soft-tissue infection.     

Localization of indium-111 leukocytes in noninfected neoplasms

Indium-111-labeled autologous leukocyte studies in general carry a high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the investigation of infections and abscesses. However, past studies have described sporadic cases in which 111In leukocytes localized in tumors. Our experience using 111In leukocytes for the investigation of fever of unknown origin in cancer patients, however, indicates a relatively high incidence of 111In leukocyte localization in noninfected neoplasms. Out of the 61 patients studied for fever of unknown origin, 21 patients (34%) manifested abnormal localization of 111In leukocytes in neoplasms without clinical evidence of infection. These included patients with abnormal localization in: (a) lymph nodes, (b) soft-tissue tumors, and (c) bone neoplasms. The tumors included both primary and secondary lesions, and hematologic as well as solid tumors. The mechanism of 111In leukocyte localization in tumors is still not completely explained. Interpretations of 111In leukocyte studies in cancer patients with fever should take into consideration the possibility that localization may occur in neoplastic tissue per se and does not always indicate the presence of infection.     

Computed tomography as a diagnostic aid in diabetic and other problem feet

Determining whether osteomyelitis is present in patients with foot infections represents a significant diagnostic challenge. As bone uptake with nuclide scans can be affected by soft tissue infection, we performed computed tomography (CT) on seven patients to see if marrow or bone abnormalities could be seen and used to predict the presence or absence of osteomyelitis. The CT scans correctly predicted the presence or absence of osteomyelitis in all seven patients. Four patients had osteomyelitis and three patients did not. Nuclide bone scans had one false-positive and one false-negative result. In this small series, CT proved helpful in evaluating foot problems.     

Osteomyelitis complicating fracture: pitfalls of 111In leukocyte scintigraphy

111In-labeled leukocyte imaging has shown greater accuracy and specificity than alternative noninvasive methods in the detection of uncomplicated osteomyelitis. Forty patients with suspected osteomyelitis complicating fractures (with and without surgical intervention) were evaluated with 111In-labeled leukocytes. All five patients with intense focal uptake, but only one of 13 with no uptake, had active osteomyelitis. However, mild to moderate 111In leukocyte uptake, observed in 22 cases, indicated the presence of osteomyelitis in only four of these; the other false-positive results were observed in noninfected callus formation, heterotopic bone formation, myositis ossificans, and sickle-cell disease. These results suggest that 111In-labeled leukocyte imaging is useful for the evaluation of suspected osteomyelitis complicating fracture but must be used in conjunction with clinical and radiographic correlation to avoid false-positive results.     

Osteomyelitis: diagnosis with (99m)Tc-labeled antigranulocyte antibodies compared with diagnosis with (111)In-labeled leukocytes--initial experience

PURPOSE: To compare a technetium 99m-labeled murine immunoglobulin M monoclonal antigranulocyte antibody that binds to human polymorphonuclear leukocyte CD15 antigens with indium 111 ((111)In)-labeled leukocytes in the diagnosis of appendicular skeletal osteomyelitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients suspected of having infected joint replacement (n = 12), diabetic pedal osteomyelitis (n = 8), or long bone osteomyelitis (n = 4) were imaged 5, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after antibody injection. Following injection, one patient experienced moderate joint pain exacerbation that resolved spontaneously. Patients underwent imaging with (111)In-labeled leukocytes and three-phase bone imaging. All studies were interpreted alone. Images obtained in antibody and (111)In-labeled leukocyte studies were also interpreted with the bone scans. One reader, without knowledge of other study results or final diagnoses, reviewed and interpreted images in a random order. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for the antibody study at each time point, the (111)In-labeled leukocyte study, the three-phase bone scanning procedure, and dual-tracer studies. RESULTS: There were 11 cases of osteomyelitis. Bone scintigraphy was sensitive (1.0) but nonspecific (0.38). Images obtained in the 120-minute antibody study were sensitive (0.91), moderately specific (0.69), and comparable to those obtained in the (111)In-labeled leukocyte study (0.91 sensitivity, 0.62 specificity). When interpreted with bone scans, images obtained in the antibody and (111)In-labeled leukocyte studies showed improved sensitivity and specificity (1.0 and 0.85 and 1.0 and 0.77, respectively). CONCLUSION: Use of the monoclonal antigranulocyte antibody was comparable to the use of (111)In-labeled leukocytes in the diagnosis of appendicular skeletal osteomyelitis. The combined results of the monoclonal antibody study and bone scanning were more accurate (0.91) for diagnosing this entity than were the results of any of the other studies.     

Indium-111-labeled white blood cells in the detection of osteomyelitis complicated by a pre-existing condition

Forty-six patients (23M, 23F) ranging in age from 19 to 79 yr with a clinical history of a nonunion fracture, surgery, diabetes or a soft-tissue infection were studied with [111In]oxine WBCs to detect osteomyelitis. There were 27 true-positive, nine true-negative, two false-positive and one false-negative. The false-positives and the false-negative occurred in patients with soft-tissue infections overlying the area of interest. All diagnoses were confirmed by intraoperative bone biopsies and cultures. Bone biopsy and scan were performed within 2 days of each other in 39 patients. The overall sensitivity was 97% (27/28), specificity, 82% (9/11) and the diagnostic accuracy, 92% (36/39). The remaining seven patients had negative [111In]WBC scans several months after positive bone biopsies and definite antibiotic treatment. This suggests that [In]WBC scans become negative after appropriate therapy is undertaken. Interobserver data was obtained from four nuclear physicians of varying experience blinded to clinical information. A high degree of agreement was found in over 90% of the cases. This study demonstrates the utility of [111In]WBC scans in the diagnosis and follow-up of complicated osteomyelitis and a high level of interobserver agreement in scan interpretation.     

Diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the presence of soft-tissue infection and radiologic evidence of osseous abnormalities: value of leukocyte scintigraphy

To evaluate the usefulness of 111In-leukocyte scintigraphy for identifying osteomyelitis in the presence of soft-tissue infection, we prospectively studied 45 bone sites adjacent to soft-tissue infection in patients with abnormal findings on radiographs and 99mTc bone scans that were suggestive of osteomyelitis. 111In-leukocyte scans were analyzed in terms of the intensity of abnormal uptake and its location relative to bone. The diagnosis of osteomyelitis was established from results of percutaneous bone biopsy culture (n = 35), histologic examination of surgical specimens (n = 8), and clinical follow-up (n = 2). Osteomyelitis was present at 22 sites, including 16 of 18 sites with increased leukocyte uptake in bone, resulting in a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 91%, and positive predictive value of 89% for this finding. Osteomyelitis was present at four of 17 sites with predominantly soft-tissue localization of leukocyte activity in the region of bone, none of seven sites with normal leukocyte scans, and two of three sites with diminished leukocyte uptake in bone. Although not helpful in distinguishing infectious from noninfectious bone abnormalities, 3- and especially 24-hr bone scans viewed in conjunction with leukocyte studies provided important correlation to aid in estimating the location of focal abnormal leukocyte uptake. The finding of soft-tissue infection with increased uptake of labeled leukocytes that extends to involve adjacent bone strongly suggests concurrent osteomyelitis. When the presence of abnormal leukocyte uptake in bone is uncertain, additional imaging and possibly biopsy may be required to establish or exclude the diagnosis of osteomyelitis.     

Potential role of FDG PET in the setting of diabetic neuro-osteoarthropathy: can it differentiate uncomplicated Charcot's neuroarthropathy from osteomyelitis and soft-tissue infection?

BACKGROUND: This paper is based on the results from an ongoing prospective trial designed to investigate the usefulness of FDG PET in the complicated diabetic foot. AIM: To investigate the potential utility of FDG PET imaging in the setting of acute neuropathic osteoarthropathy (Charcot's foot). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 63 patients, in four groups, were evaluated. The groups were: (A) 17 patients with a clinical diagnosis of Charcot's neuroarthropathy (11 men, six women; mean age: 59.4+/-8.6 years); (B) 21 patients with uncomplicated diabetic foot (16 men, five women; mean age: 63+/-10 years); (C) 20 non-diabetic patients with normal lower extremities (12 men, eight women; mean age 54+/-19 years); and (D) five patients with proven osteomyelitis secondary to complicated diabetic foot (three men, two women; mean age: 61.2+/-13.9 years). Five patients in group A had foot ulcer and intermediate to high degree of suspicion for superimposed osteomyelitis. Each subject underwent FDG PET imaging of the lower extremities in addition to MRI and the findings were compared with the final diagnostic outcome based on histopathology and clinical follow-up. The images were examined visually for focal abnormalities. Regions of interest were assigned to the sites of abnormal FDG uptake for calculating maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Two important clinical decision-making issues were explored: (1) whether FDG PET shows a definitive uptake pattern in Charcot's neuroarthropathy and if so whether that could be utilized to differentiate it from other complicated forms of diabetic foot like osteomyelitis and cellulitis, which is frequently a diagnostic challenge in this clinical setting; and (2) how accurate FDG PET is in detection soft tissue infection in patients with Charcot's foot. These issues were examined by utilizing FDG PET findings along with MRI results in the same patient. RESULTS: We observed a low degree of diffuse FDG uptake in the Charcot's joints. This was clearly distinguishable from the normal joints. The SUVmax in the Charcot's lesions varied from 0.7 to 2.4 (mean, 1.3+/-0.4) while those of midfoot of the normal control subjects and the uncomplicated diabetic foot ranged from 0.2 to 0.7 (mean 0.42+/-0.12) and from 0.2 to 0.8 (mean 0.5+/-0.16), respectively. The only patient with Charcot's foot with superimposed osteomyelitis had an SUVmax of 6.5. The SUVmax of the sites of osteomyelitis as a complication of diabetic foot was 2.9-6.2 (mean: 4.38+/-1.39). Unifactorial analysis of variance test yielded a statistical significance in the SUVmax between the four groups (P<0.01). The SUVmax between the normal control groups and the uncomplicated diabetic foot was not statistically significant by the Student's t-test (P>0.05). In the setting of concomitant foot ulcer FDG PET accurately ruled out osteomyelitis. Overall sensitivity and accuracy of FDG PET in the diagnosis of Charcot's foot was 100 and 93.8%, respectively; and for MRI were 76.9 and 75%, respectively. FDG PET showed foci of abnormally enhanced uptake in the soft tissue which was suggestive of inflammation in seven cases (43.75%) which were proven pathologically to be secondary to infection. In only two of these cases the features of soft tissue infection were noted on the magnetic resonance images. CONCLUSION: The results support a valuable role of FDG PET in the setting of Charcot's neuroarthropathy by reliably differentiating it from osteomyelitis both in general and when foot ulcer is present.     

Diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients: value of 111In-leukocyte scintigraphy

The noninvasive diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients with currently available radiologic and radionuclide imaging techniques is often difficult. Recently, 111In-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy has been proposed as an attractive alternative. Accordingly, we retrospectively reviewed 51 111In-labeled leukocyte scans, 49 technetium-99m bone scans, and 49 plain radiographs obtained in 51 adults with diabetes in whom osteomyelitis of the foot was suspected. The sensitivity and specificity of these techniques were evaluated in all patients, as well as in a subgroup of 11 patients with neuroarthropathy. Results with 111In-labeled leukocyte scans were also examined in subsets of patients with soft-tissue ulcers (n = 35) and those receiving antibiotics during investigation (n = 20). Confirmation or exclusion of osteomyelitis was made surgically in 28 patients and clinically in 23. Fourteen patients had osteomyelitis. Bone scans were most sensitive (93%) but least specific (43%); plain radiographs were most specific (83%) but least sensitive (43%). 111In-labeled leukocyte scans were both sensitive (79%) and specific (78%), and remained useful in patients with neuroarthropathy, soft-tissue ulcers, and antibiotic treatment. Poor spatial resolution contributed to the false-negative and false-positive 111In-labeled leukocyte scans, suggesting that this technique should not be interpreted independent of other tests. 111In-labeled leukocyte scans are a valuable diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of pedal osteomyelitis in diabetic patients.     

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of diabetic foot with suspected osteomyelitis

Purpose

This study evaluated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in infected diabetic foot ulcers.

Materials and methods

Sixteen diabetic patients underwent foot MRI between January 2006 and September 2007 for suspected unilateral osteomyelitis. Three of 16 patients showed radiographic changes due to Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy. Twelve of 16 patients also underwent MR angiography of the lower limbs for the purpose of planning surgical or endovascular treatment. The musculoskeletal and vascular MRI studies were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists.

Results

The final diagnosis, based on clinical, imaging, microbiological and histological findings, was osteomyelitis in 13/16 cases. Foot MRI allowed a correct diagnosis in 15/16 patients, with 1 false positive result demonstrated by computed tomography (CT)-guided bone biopsy. MR angiography of the lower limbs was considered nondiagnostic in 5/12 patients in the infrapopliteal region owing to venous contamination.

Conclusions

MRI has high sensitivity for the detection of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot but lower specificity related to Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy. If diagnostic uncertainty persists, a bone biopsy is indicated. The inflammatory hyperaemia caused by the ulcer deteriorates the diagnostic quality of 40%–50% of MR angiography studies in the infrapopliteal region. In these cases, selective arteriography is appropriate, as it can be performed in the same session as angioplasty.     

Clinical evaluation of indium-111-labeled leukocyte imaging in bone infection

In-111-oxine-labeled leukocyte imaging was performed on twenty-one patients suspected of having bone infection. Nine of eleven cases (82%) were diagnosed as having active infection as demonstrated by abnormal accumulation of In-111-labeled leukocytes at the site of infection. There are two false negative (18%) cases. Two cases without active infection showed abnormal uptake. Four cases revealed cold defects on the scintigraphy. Marked uptake of radiotracer was noted not only in the case of acute osteomyelitis with acute septicaemia but also in the case with persistent chronic active osteomyelitis. It was observed that for precise evaluation of the test results it was equally important to compare the imaging findings with physical signs and laboratory investigations. It is concluded that In-111-oxine-labeled leukocyte imaging is a useful tool for the evaluation of the progression of bone infection.     

Detection of acute osteomyelitis with indium-111 labeled white blood cells in a patient with sickle cell disease

A young patient with sickle cell disease (SCD) and multiple hospitalizations for crisis was admitted because of suspected osteomyelitis. Initial laboratory work, radiographs, and bone images were not contributory. An In-111 white blood cell (WBC) study demonstrated two areas of increased radionuclide uptake consistent with osteomyelitis. One of these had associated soft tissue infection. No other areas of active osteomyelitis were visualized, in spite of the presence of several additional infection sites. Imaging with In-111 WBC is probably not justified for routine diagnosis of acute osteomyelitis in areas free of previous disease, where conventional bone images are highly efficient. In-111 WBC imaging, however, may be helpful in detecting osteomyelitis in selected patients with SCD in whom Tc-99m bone images and radiographs are usually abnormal and difficult to interpret due to previous bone infarcts. Localization of the infection focus is very important in choosing the aspiration site for bacteriologic studies. A negative study, however, should be interpreted cautiously.     

Evaluation of infectious diabetic foot complications with indium-111-labeled human nonspecific immunoglobulin G.

Osteomyelitis of the foot is a well-known complication of diabetes mellitus. In this study, the validity of 111In-labeled human nonspecific immunoglobulin G (IgG) scintigraphy was studied in 16 diabetic patients with foot ulcers, gangrene or painful Charcot joints. In all patients, plain radiographs, conventional bone scan images and 111In-IgG images were recorded. The results were verified by histologic examination of surgical specimens in patients who did not respond to antibiotic treatment within 2-3 wk (10 lesions) or long-term clinical follow-up of at least 6-mo (16 lesions). On the bone scans, all seven osteomyelitic foci were detected. However, 19 additional foci not due to osteomyelitis were seen. The absence of true-negative bone scans in this study resulted in a specificity of 0%. On the plain radiographs, four of seven osteomyelitis foci were detected; for 111In-IgG scintigraphy, six of seven (sensitivity 57% and 86%, respectively). Plain radiographs correctly ruled out osteomyelitis in 15 of 19 lesions, 111In-IgG scintigraphy in 16 of 19 (specificity 79% and 84%, respectively). All imaging procedures gave false-positive results in penetrating ulcers over the calcaneus in two patients and in one patient with a Charcot joint, most likely due to recent fractures. A false-negative 111In-IgG study was observed in a patient with severe arterial angiopathy. Accurate estimation of probable osteomyelitis was not possible from the results of soft-tissue cultures, since in only 6 of 12 positive cultures, osteomyelitic foci could be proven. Indium-111-IgG scintigraphy can contribute to adequate evaluation of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot complications because it improves specificity when compared to bone scan and radiographic findings and improves sensitivity in comparison to plain radiographs.