Hydrogen breath test quantification and clinical correlation of lactose malabsorption in adult irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis

Lactose malabsorption was studied, by hydrogen breath test, in 72 adults suffering from irritable bowel syndrome, in 20 ulcerative colitis patients, and in 69 healthy subjects. The minimum dose of lactose required to cause a positive breath test was determined, and the symptoms caused and the resulting hydrogen eliminated quantified. A high incidence of lactose malabsorption was shown at standard doses (up to 50 g) in both the healthy subjects (70%) and the patients (86% and 85%, respectively). In the irritable bowel syndrome and the ulcerative colitis groups, symptoms occurred with a smaller quantity of breath hydrogen, presumably in association with a greater individual sensitivity of the colon to distension. The threshold lactose dose was notably lower in the diseased subjects who registered as evidence a prevalence of malabsorption at a 20-g lactose load. The pathogenetic role of lactose malabsorption in the irritable bowel syndrome is emphasized, as is the importance of the personal lactose tolerance.     

Breath testing to evaluate lactose intolerance in irritable bowel syndrome correlates with lactulose testing and may not reflect true lactose malabsorption

OBJECTIVES: An increased prevalence of lactose intolerance is seen in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Recently, we demonstrated a high prevalence of abnormal lactulose breath test results in IBS suggesting bacterial overgrowth. Because symptoms of lactose intolerance result from bacterial fermentation, the purpose of this study was to determine whether an abnormal lactose breath test is reflective of malabsorption or early presentation to bacteria. METHODS: Subjects with diarrhea-predominant IBS were enrolled. On day 1, subjects underwent a lactulose breath test after an overnight fast. Within 1 wk, subjects returned after fasting for a lactose breath test with simultaneous blood glucose measurements every 15 min to complete a lactose tolerance test (LTT). Symptoms were evaluated 3 h after lactose administration. RESULTS: Twenty subjects completed the study. One subject inadvertently received dextrose through the intravenous and was excluded. Of the remaining 19 subjects, three (16%) had an abnormal LTT suggesting malabsorption. In all, 10 subjects (53%) had an abnormal lactose breath test, 14 (74%) had an abnormal lactulose breath test, and 11 (58%) had symptoms after lactose administration. The agreement with symptoms was moderate (kappa = 0.47) and fair (kappa = 0.24) when compared to the lactose breath test and LTT, respectively. There was a fair correlation between lactose breath test and LTT (kappa = 0.29). However, lactose breath test hydrogen levels >166 ppm were universally predictive of abnormal LTT. Finally, a significant correlation was seen between the hydrogen production on lactose and lactulose breath test (r = 0.56, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lactose breath testing in IBS subjects does not seem to reflect malabsorption; it may be an indicator of abnormal lactulose breath test, suggesting bacterial overgrowth.     

Is lactose intolerance implicated in the development of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome or functional diarrhoea in previously asymptomatic people?

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between lactose intolerance and post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in adults is uncertain. Bowel symptoms may persist after bacterial gastroenteritis and as post-infectious IBS. Acquired lactose intolerance may follow viral enteric infections in children. We compared the frequency of lactose intolerance after bacterial gastroenteritis in adults with and without symptoms of IBS or functional diarrhoea at 3-6-months' follow-up. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted. METHODS: All subjects with bacterial gastroenteritis confirmed by stool culture from the microbiology laboratory and without prior IBS or functional diarrhoea were eligible to participate. IBS and functional diarrhoea were diagnosed via self-completed Rome II modular questionnaires. Lactose intolerance was determined from a rise in breath hydrogen and plasma glucose and symptoms. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight subjects with bacterial gastroenteritis were followed prospectively, from which a smaller cohort of 42 subjects took part in this study. The cohort was comprised of 24/25 subjects who developed post-infectious IBS (n = 16) or functional diarrhoea (n = 8) (9 male, 15 female) and 18 random controls (8 male, 10 female) chosen from the group without IBS or functional diarrhoea. The mean age of the subjects was 44.4 years (range 25-76 years). In the group with functional diarrhoea or IBS, four subjects had failure of the plasma glucose to rise but none had abnormal glucose hydrogen breath tests. In the control subjects, one had a positive combined test and six had failure of plasma glucose to rise alone. No subject developed symptoms during the test. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial gastroenteritis did not cause persistent lactose intolerance in our study population. Lactose intolerance does not appear to be implicated in the aetiology of post-infectious bowel symptoms, including IBS. Advice to avoid dairy products in patients presenting with post-infectious IBS on the basis that they may have lactose intolerance appears unnecessary in patients from northern England.     

Lactose intolerance in patients with irritable bowel syndrome from northern India: a case-control study

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and lactose intolerance (LI) overlap. Data on the frequency of LI in patients with IBS from India are scanty. The aim of this study was to evaluate: (i) the frequency of LI in patients with IBS and its various subtypes as compared with healthy subjects (HS) from northern India; (ii) the relationship between self-reported milk intolerance and laboratory evidence of LI; and (iii) the role of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in LI in patients with IBS. METHODS: 124 patients with IBS (Rome II criteria) and 53 age- and gender-matched HS were studied for LI using the lactose hydrogen breath test (LHBT) and the lactose tolerance test (LTT). Symptoms following lactose ingestion (diarrhea, bloating or distension) during the test and history of milk intolerance were recorded. Sixty-nine of the patients with IBS also underwent a glucose hydrogen breath test (GHBT). Patients with IBS were classified into those with diarrhea (IBS-D; >3 loose stools/d), constipation predominant (IBS-C; <3 stools/week) and indeterminate (IBS-I; between >or=3/week and 相似文献   

Lactose malabsorption in Greek adults: correlation of small bowel transit time with the severity of lactose intolerance.

Using breath hydrogen analysis after 139 mmol (50 g) oral lactose load, we investigated the prevalence of lactose malabsorption in 200 Greek adults and examined the relationship between symptoms and small bowel transit time. One hundred and fifty subjects had increased breath hydrogen concentrations (greater than 20 ppm) after the lactose load. In these individuals peak breath hydrogen concentration was inversely related to small bowel transit time (r = 0.63, 6 = 6.854, p less than 0.001) and the severity of symptoms decreased with increasing small bowel transit time. Lactose malabsorbers with diarrhoea during the lactose tolerance test had a small bowel transit time of 51 +/- 22 minutes (x +/- SD; n = 90) which was significantly shorter than the small bowel transit time of patients with colicky pain, flatulence, and abdominal distension (74 +/- 30, n = 53; p less than 0.001) and both groups had significantly shorter small bowel transit time than that of asymptomatic malabsorbers (115 +/- 21 n:7; p less than 0.001). When the oral lactose load was reduced to 33 mmol (12 g), the small bowel transit time increased five-fold and the overall incidence of diarrhoea and/or symptoms decreased dramatically. These results indicate that the prevalence of lactase deficiency in Greece may be as high as 75% and suggest that symptom production in lactose malabsorbers is brought about by the rapid passage down the small intestine of the malabsorbed lactose.     

Lactose intolerance in adults with chronic unspecific abdominal complaints

77 hospitalized patients with chronic unspecific abdominal complaints, in whom any other organic disease had been previously excluded, were investigated for lactose malabsorption; they were subdivided into two groups: 46 patients complaining primarily of colicky abdominal pain and/or intermittent diarrhoea (group 1) and 31 patients presenting with dyspepsia as the predominant symptom (group 2). To establish the exact prevalence of isolated lactase deficiency in the healthy adult population served by our hospital, 40 Italian adult healthy subjects were also studied. The prevalence of lactose malabsorption was significantly higher (p less than 0.005) in patients of the 1st group than in patients of the 2nd group, and in the healthy adult population seen at our hospital (74% vs 35.5% and 37.5%, respectively). Furthermore a high prevalence of lactose intolerance, determined by means of a three-week diet trial (lactose free-diet versus normal diet), was documented among lactose malabsorbers of the 1st group. We concluded therefore that lactose intolerance is a factor in some Italian adult patients who suffer from long-standing aspecific abdominal discomfort, and it should be always considered in these patients, especially when colicky abdominal pain and diarrhoea are present, before the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome is made.     

Irritable bowel syndrome: is the search for lactose intolerance justified?

OBJECTIVES: To determine if confirmation of hypolactasia offers any benefit to the dietary treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: One hundred and twenty-two consecutive IBS patients (37 male, 85 female) were given lactose hydrogen breath tests (LHBT). Those with positive LHBT followed a low lactose diet for 3 weeks. Those improving on the diet were given double-blind, placebo-controlled challenges (DBPCC) with 5 g, 10 g and 15 g of lactose and a placebo, to confirm lactose intolerance. Those who did not respond to the low lactose diet followed either an exclusion or low fibre diet. Symptoms scores were kept prior to the LHBT, 8 h post-LHBT and daily whilst following any dietary change. Patients with negative LHBT returned to clinic and subsequent dietary interventions were recorded. RESULTS: LHBT was positive in 33/122 (27%) IBS patients. Syrr otom scores prior to LHBT were not significantly different between the two groups, but after LHBT the symptoms in the positive group were significantly worse. Twenty-three patients followed a low-lactose diet of which only nine (39%) improved. Six who did not improve followed an exclusion diet, three improved and all were intolerant of milk. Three tried a low fibre diet with two improving. DBPCC were inconclusive. In the negative LHBT group 35 agreed to try a diet and 24 improved (69%). Eight were intolerant of cow's milk. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a low lactose diet was disappointing in IBS patients with lactose malabsorption. Food intolerance was demonstrated in IBS patients with positive or negative LHBT and milk was identified as a problem in both groups. DBPCC were inconclusive. There appears to be little advantage in trying to separate patients who malabsorb lactose from others with IBS.     

The effect of a lactose-restricted diet in patients with a positive lactose tolerance test, earlier diagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome: a 5-year follow-up study

DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospectively, the effect of a lactose-restricted diet was evaluated among irritable bowel syndrome patients with lactose malabsorption. Lactose malabsorption was defined by a positive hydrogen breath test and a positive blood-glucose test. An analysis of symptoms was completed before, during, 6 weeks after and 5 years after starting the diet. In addition, the number of visits made by the patients to the outpatient clinic was scored during 6 years. RESULTS: In 17 out of 70 irritable bowel syndrome patients (24.3%), lactose malabsorption was detected. There was no difference in the symptom score between patients with a positive lactose tolerance test and patients with a negative lactose tolerance test. After 6 weeks of the lactose-restricted diet, symptoms were markedly improved in lactose malabsorption-positive patients (P < 0.001). After 5 years, one patient was lost for follow-up, and 14 out of the remaining 16 lactose malabsorption patients (87.5%) still had no complaints during the lactose-restricted diet. Two patients chose not to follow the diet continuously and accepted the discomfort caused by lactose intake. Only two out of 16 patients (12.5%) no longer experienced any benefit from lactose restriction. In the 5 years before their diagnosis of lactose malabsorption, these 16 patients visited the outpatient clinic a total of 192 times (mean 2.4 visits per year per person; range 1-7 visits). In the 5 years after diagnosis, they visited the outpatient clinic a total of 45 times (mean 0.6 visits per year per person; range 0-6 visits; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large majority of irritable bowel syndrome patients with lactose malabsorption, which was previously clinically unrecognized, a lactose-restricted diet improved symptoms markedly both in the short term and the long term. Furthermore, visits by all patients to the outpatient clinic were reduced by 75%. We conclude that diet therapy is extremely cost- and time-saving. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that lactose malabsorption, which is easily treatable, is excluded before diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome.     

Lactase deficiency and lactose intolerance-related symptoms in adult healthy subjects from western France]

The prevalence of lactase deficiency (LD) and lactose intolerance is not well known in France. Using breath hydrogen and methane analysis after 50 g oral lactose load, we investigated the prevalences of LD, lactose intolerance, and methane producer status in 102 healthy adults born in western France, and we examined the relationships between these parameters and the daily milk consumption. In 10 subjects with LD and lactose intolerance, we studied the reproducibility of the lactose hydrogen breath test results for the diagnosis of LD and lactose intolerance and estimated the quantity of lactose malabsorbed in comparison with the lactulose hydrogen breath test. The prevalence of LD was 23.4 percent and symptoms of lactose intolerance were observed in 50 percent of the 24 subjects with LD. The daily milk consumption was not significantly different in the 24 subjects with LD and in the 78 subjects without LD (281 +/- 197 vs 303 +/- 217 ml/24 h). The prevalence of methane producer status was 42.1 percent. The symptomatic group of lactose malabsorbers (n = 12) was characterized by a shorter lactose mouth to caecum transit time (39 +/- 20 vs 88 +/- 48 min; P less than 0.05), and more marked hydrogen production (6.1 +/- 2.3 vs 3.4 +/- 2.4 10(3) ppm.min; P less than 0.04). In the 10 subjects with LD and lactose intolerance, the hydrogen breath test was reproducible for diagnosis of LD and lactose intolerance, and for hydrogen production. The quantity of lactose malabsorbed was 60 percent. In France, symptoms of lactose intolerance are not severe and do not affect the daily consumption of milk and dairy products.     

Peppermint oil (Mintoil) in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized trial

INTRODUCTION: The use of peppermint oil in treating the irritable bowel syndrome has been studied with variable results probably due to the presence of patients affected by small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, lactose intolerance or celiac disease that may have symptoms similar to irritable bowel syndrome. AIM: The aim of the study was to test the effectiveness of enteric-coated peppermint oil in patients with irritable bowel syndrome in whom small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, lactose intolerance and celiac disease were excluded. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with irritable bowel syndrome according to the Rome II criteria, with normal lactose and lactulose breath tests and negative antibody screening for celiac disease, were treated with peppermint oil (two enteric-coated capsules twice per day or placebo) for 4 weeks in a double blind study. The symptoms were assessed before therapy (T(0)), after the first 4 weeks of therapy (T(4)) and 4 weeks after the end of therapy (T(8)). The symptoms evaluated were: abdominal bloating, abdominal pain or discomfort, diarrhoea, constipation, feeling of incomplete evacuation, pain at defecation, passage of gas or mucus and urgency at defecation. For each symptom intensity and frequency from 0 to 4 were scored. The total irritable bowel syndrome symptoms score was also calculated as the mean value of the sum of the average of the intensity and frequency scores of each symptom. RESULTS: At T(4), 75% of the patients in the peppermint oil group showed a >50% reduction of basal (T(0)) total irritable bowel syndrome symptoms score compared with 38% in the placebo group (P<0.009). With peppermint oil at T(4) and at T(8) compared with T(0) a statistically significant reduction of the total irritable bowel syndrome symptoms score was found (T(0): 2.19+/-0.13, T(4): 1.07+/-0.10*, T(8): 1.60+/-0.10*, *P<0.01 compared with T(0), mean+/-S.E.M.), while no change was found with the placebo. CONCLUSION: A 4 weeks treatment with peppermint oil improves abdominal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.     

Lactose intolerance in active Crohn's disease: clinical value of duodenal lactase analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with active Crohn's disease (CD) often report having abdominal symptoms after ingestion of milk products, but the pathomechanism for lactose malabsorption seems to be complex. GOALS: To investigate the prevalence of clinical milk intolerance and to objectify symptoms with hydrogen (H 2 ) breath testing, analysis of lactase protein, and enzyme activity in the duodenal mucosa in patients with CD and in healthy controls. STUDY: In 49 patients with CD and 24 controls, H 2 breath testing was performed. All individuals underwent endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract, in which multiple pinch samples were taken from the distal duodenum. Lactase activity was measured using the method of Dahlquist. The lactase protein expression was analyzed by gel electrophoresis using the monoclonal antibody mlac 10 and by immunochemistry using the monoclonal antibody mlac 4. RESULTS: Prevalence of milk intolerance in healthy controls was 16.6% versus 46.9% in patients with CD, with a high frequency (83.3%) in patients with active disease (CD activity index >150). Milk intolerance was correlated to the duration of inflammatory bowel disease ( p = 0.023) but not to the location or previous bowel resection. Hydrogen breath testing had a moderate sensitivity in detecting lactose maldigestion (70.4%) and a high specificity (95.6%). Duodenal lactase levels were also correlated to disease activity, whereas correlations to clinical symptoms remained poor. Patients with milk intolerance had a significantly reduced bone density at the lumbar spine (z-score, -1.33 +/- 0.92 vs. -0.19 +/- 0.95 [mean +/- SD]; p = 0.002) CONCLUSIONS: Milk intolerance is a frequent problem in active CD, which can be objectified accurately by H 2 lactose breath testing. Decreased lactase levels in the duodenal mucosa may be found during an acute flare but are not the predominant cause of milk intolerance in CD.     

Lactose Malabsorption in Patients Operated Upon for Peptic Ulcer

A lactose tolerance test was performed and small intestinal mucosal disaccharidase activity was determined in 12 patients operated upon for peptic ulcer who had lactose malabsorption. Most patients were misjudged, since they were considered to suffer from post-operative complaints (vagotomy diarrhoea, afferent loop syndrome, recurrent ulcer and dumping). Three patients did not develop symptoms of milk intolerance until immediately after an operation for peptic ulcer; in 3 other patients this operation exacerbated the existing symptoms after consumption of milk. Two patients had steatorrhoea, which disappeared or diminished when lactose excluded from the diet.     

Lactose malabsorption

Opinion statement Lactose malabsorption is a syndrome producing constellation of symptoms, including abdominal pain, bloating, flatulence, diarrhea, and sometimes nausea and/or vomiting. Primary causes of lactose malabsorption due to loss of intestinal lactase activity include genetic/racial lactase nonpersistence, congenital lactase deficiency, and developmental lactase deficiency. Secondary lactose malabsorption can be caused by any disorder that injures the small intestinal mucosa, such as viral gastroenteritis, celiac disease, allergic (eosinophilic) gastroenteritis, and radiation enteritis. The diagnosis depends on careful clinical evaluation and is customarily confirmed with a lactose breath hydrogen test. As the symptoms are nonspecific, many adults diagnosed with lactose malabsorption actually have irritable bowel syndrome. Treatment consists of a trial of eliminating lactose-containing dairy foods, with supplementation of alternative calcium and protein sources. Commercial enzyme products containing β-galactosidases can be prescribed to help patients digest dietary lactose. Long-term lactose restriction usually is not necessary and can lead to reduced bone mineral density.     

Lactose malabsorption and intolerance in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Lactase activity declines with age in rats, but it is not clear whether this model is also shared by humans. Few studies have evaluated lactose intolerance and malabsorption in the elderly and no definite conclusions can be drawn. The aim of our study was therefore to verify the impact of age on lactose intolerance and malabsorption. METHODS: Eighty-four healthy subjects took part in the study. Thirty-three were <65 years, 17 were between 65 and 74 years and 34 were >74 years. All the subjects underwent a preliminary evaluation of intestinal gas production capacity and oro-cecal transit time by H2/CH4 breath test after lactulose. After a 3-day period, an H2/CH4 breath test after lactose was performed. The occurrence of intolerance symptoms during the test and in the 24 h after the test was recorded. RESULTS: Breath H2 and CH4 excretion parameters at fasting and after lactulose did not differ between the three groups. Cumulative breath H2 excretion after lactose was higher in subjects >74 years than in subjects <65 years and in subjects aged 65-74 years, while no difference was found between the latter two groups. In subjects >74 years, the prevalence of lactose malabsorption was higher than in the other two groups, while no significant difference was observed between subjects <65 years and subjects aged 65-74 years. Within the malabsorber subjects, the prevalence of lactose intolerance was higher in subjects <65 years than in those aged 65-74 years and in those aged >74 years. No significant difference was found between the latter two groups. No difference was found between the three groups in terms of daily calcium intake and a significant negative correlation between symptom score and daily calcium intake was only found in the group of subjects aged <65 years. CONCLUSIONS: As age increases, the prevalence of lactose malabsorption shows an increase while the prevalence of intolerance symptoms among malabsorbers shows a decrease. Accordingly, daily calcium intake was similar among the adults and elderly studied.     

Breath hydrogen excretion after lactose and whole milk ingestion. A prospective comparison in lactase deficiency

As the 50 g of lactose in the usual clinical test is unphysiologic both because it is equivalent to 1 L milk and because the usual dietary intake is not the purified sugar, but milk, we undertook a prospective comparison of the absorption of lactose after both lactose and milk ingestion with an equivalent lactose content. We studied 51 healthy volunteers, using the hydrogen breath test technique. All patients received 25 g lactose in aqueous solution. Subjects with an abnormal test had the test repeated with 500 ml whole cow's milk, whereas subjects with a normal test repeated the test after ingesting the unabsorbable sugar lactulose to detect the capacity of their colonic flora to produce the gas. Symptoms of gastrointestinal intolerance were also recorded. Compared to an equivalent lactose amount, milk lactose is better absorbed (8% of the entire population malabsorbed 500 ml whole milk, whereas 33.33% malabsorbed 25 g lactose) and induces intolerance in fewer subjects. We conclude that milk rather than pure lactose must be used in clinical evaluation of lactose malabsorption and intolerance.     

Evaluation of Patients Who Meet Clinical Criteria for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Objective : To determine which test would yield the most useful clinical data in evaluation of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methods : One hundred ninety-six pa-tients who met the International Congress of Gastro-enterology criteria for irritable bowel syndrome were prospectively evaluated with hematological, biochemi-cal, and metabolic laboratory testing, as well as a struc-tural evaluation of the colon. Results : complete blood count, sedimentation rate (ESR), serum chemistries, thyroid profile, and urinalysis were normal or yielded no useful clinical information. Stool examinations parasites were also normal. Structural evaluations (barium enema, x-ray, and flexible sigmoidoscopy or colon-oscopy) revealed abnormalities, including colon cancer (1), polyps (9), colitis (1), melanosis coli (2), diverticu-losis (17), and hemorrhoids (11). Forty-eight subjects (25.8%) had lactose maldigestion confirmed by H2 breath Jactose testing. Prior to formal testing, 25 (52%) of these subjects were unaware of the relationship be-tween lactose-containing foods and their symptoms. Conclusions : 1) ESR, thyroid profiles, and parasite examinations had no diagnostic yield in this study and, without speciflc clinical indication from history and physical examination, should not be part of the "rou-tine" IBS evaluation. 2) Lactose hydrogen breath test-ing is encouraged for patients with and without milk intolerance who present with IBS.     

Lactose intolerance: problems in diagnosis and treatment

Lactose malabsorption and lactase deficiency are chronic organic pathologic conditions characterized by abdominal pain and distention, flatulence, and the passage of loose, watery stools. Though malabsorption of the sugar lactose is determinable by breath hydrogen test or jejunal biopsy, intolerance can only be confirmed by challenge with lactose-containing food, the response to which may not be immediate. The difficulty of making a positive diagnosis of these conditions has led to a proportion of lactose-intolerant patients being misdiagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), which has a remarkably similar symptom complex and for which there is no current pathophysiologic marker. The incidence of the two disorders is approximately equal, but the actual proportion of patients with IBS incorrectly diagnosed in this way varies as a function of the methodology used. Once correct diagnosis is established, introduction of a lactose-free dietary regime relieves symptoms in most patients. Symptom similarity and the resultant incorrect diagnosis of IBS may explain the refractory nature of some patients labeled as IBS who remain largely unaware of the relationship between food intake and symptoms.     

57-year-old female patient in early retirement with underweight and chronic-relapsing diarrhoea

Underweight as a consequence of chronic diarrhoea may lead to fatigue, tiredness and impaired physical performance, especially when the underlying cause has not been evaluated. In spite of algorithms as a help in the differential diagnosis, an individual approach with critical consideration of diet history, laboratory data and imaging procedures is necessary. Additional difficulties may arise when the history of food intolerance is inconsistent and technical findings including endoscopy are inconclusive. We report on a 57-year-old female patient with underweight, chronic intermittent diarrhoea and cramp-like abdominal pain for more than 10 years following pelvic irradiation due to Hodgkin's disease of the ovary. A systematic diagnostic approach was not undertaken until very recently due to the deterioration of her clinical conditions pointing to jejunal malabsorption. In spite of the absence of a specific history of milk/milk product intolerance a lactose H (2)-breath test was performed showing lactase deficiency with lactose intolerance. The rapid improvement of all her symptoms after a lactose-poor diet had been started supported this diagnosis. Possible reasons for the long time period which had elapsed until the diagnosis was established and the discrepancy of the H (2)-breath test results with the absence of a clear-cut history for milk/milk product intolerance are discussed in terms of the importance of a structured history-taking with regard to nutrition and diet habits. In addition, potential explanations for radiation-induced functional damage in the absence of morphological abnormalities are provided. Based on the experience of this case and considerations regarding the consequences of radiation-induced jejunal damage, we recommend that a lactose-H (2) breath test be routinely included in the diagnostic work-up of patients with unclear chronic diarrhoea even if there is no defined history of milk/milk product intolerance.     

Lactose Malabsorption and Intolerance in the Elderly

Background: Lactase activity declines with age in rats, but it is not clear whether this model is also shared by humans. Few studies have evaluated lactose intolerance and malabsorption in the elderly and no definite conclusions can be drawn. The aim of our study was therefore to verify the impact of age on lactose intolerance and malabsorption. Methods: Eighty-four healthy subjects took part in the study. Thirty-three were < 65 years, 17 were between 65 and 74 years and 34 were > 74 years. All the subjects underwent a preliminary evaluation of intestinal gas production capacity and oro-cecal transit time by H 2 /CH 4 breath test after lactulose. After a 3-day period, an H 2 /CH 4 breath test after lactose was performed. The occurrence of intolerance symptoms during the test and in the 24 h after the test was recorded. Results: Breath H 2 and CH 4 excretion parameters at fasting and after lactulose did not differ between the three groups. Cumulative breath H 2 excretion after lactose was higher in subjects > 74 years than in subjects < 65 years and in subjects aged 65-74 years, while no difference was found between the latter two groups. In subjects > 74 years, the prevalence of lactose malabsorption was higher than in the other two groups, while no significant difference was observed between subjects < 65 years and subjects aged 65-74 years. Within the malabsorber subjects, the prevalence of lactose intolerance was higher in subjects < 65 years than in those aged 65-74 years and in those aged > 74 years. No significant difference was found between the latter two groups. No difference was found between the three groups in terms of daily calcium intake and a significant negative correlation between symptom score and daily calcium intake was only found in the group of subjects aged < 65 years. Conclusions: As age increases, the prevalence of lactose malabsorption shows an increase while the prevalence of intolerance symptoms among malabsorbers shows a decrease. Accordingly, daily calcium intake was similar among the adults and elderly studied.