Active and passive smoking and breast cancer risk in middle-aged Japanese women

To examine the hypothesis that tobacco smoke is associated with the risk of female breast cancer, we estimated the relative risks of active and passive smoke in middle-aged Japanese women in a population-based prospective study. The cohort consisted of residents in 4 public health center areas, aged 40 to 59 years. A self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted in 1990. This analysis included 21,805 subjects, 180 of whom had developed breast cancer by December 31, 1999. When the reference was defined as never-active smokers without passive smoking, adjusted relative risks (RRs) were 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-3.6) in current active smokers, 1.2 (95% CI = 0.4-4.0) in ex-active smokers and 1.2 (95% CI = 0.8-1.6) in never-active smokers with passive smoking. The elevated risk for ever-smokers was clearly observed in premenopausal women at baseline (RR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.5-9.9) but not in postmenopausal women (RR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.5-2.5). In never-active smokers, the adjusted RR for passive smoking, residential or occupational/public tobacco smoke exposure was 1.1 (95% CI = 0.8-1.6). In premenopausal women, passive smoking increased the risk (RR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.3-5.2) but not in postmenopausal women (RR = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.4-1.0). We conclude that tobacco smoking increases the risk of female breast cancer in premenopausal women.     

Active and passive smoking with breast cancer risk for Chinese females:a systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous studies suggested that smoking and passive smoking could increase the risk of breast cancer, but the results were inconsistent, especial y for Chinese females. Thus, we systematical y searched cohort and case-control studies investigating the associations of active and passive smoking with breast cancer risk among Chinese females in four English databases （PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Wiley） and three Chinese databases （CNKI, WanFang, and VIP）. Fifty-one articles （3 cohort studies and 48 case-control studies） covering 17 provinces of China were finally included in this systematic review. Among Chinese females, there was significant association between passive smoking and this risk of breast cancer [odds ratio （OR）： 1.62; 95% confidence interval （CI）： 1.39-1.85; I2 = 75.8%, P 〈 0.001; n = 26] but no significant association between active smoking and the risk of breast cancer （OR：1.04;95%CI：0.89-1.20;I2=13.9%, P=0.248;n=31）. The OR of exposure to husband’s smoking and to smoke in the workplace was 1.27 （95% CI： 1.07-1.50） and 1.66 （95% CI： 1.07-2.59）, respectively. The OR of light and heavy passive smoking was 1.11 and 1.41, respectively, for women exposed to their husband’s smoke （〈20 and≥20 cigarettes per day）, and 1.07 and 1.87, respectively, for those exposed to smoke in the workplace （〈300 and≥300 min of exposure per day）. These results imply that passive smoking is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, and the risk seems to increase as the level of passive exposure to smoke increases among Chinese females. Women with passive exposure to smoke in the workplace have a higher risk of breast cancer than those exposed to their husband’s smoking.     

Passive smoking and breast cancer risk among non-smoking Chinese women

Our purpose was to evaluate whether passive exposure to cigarette smoke may be related to breast cancer risk. Data from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study, a large population-based study of 1459 breast cancer cases and 1556 controls aged 25-64 years, were analyzed. Respective response rates were 91.1% and 90.3%. Passive smoking questions were added to all face-to-face interviews 7 months into the study. Women were asked about exposure to their husbands' smoke at home as well as exposure in the workplace. Analyses were restricted to the 1013 cases and 1117 controls with passive tobacco smoke exposure data who had never actively smoked. Over 60% of controls reported some exposure to a husband's smoke and over 40% reported exposure to passive smoke in the workplace. Overall, there was no apparent association between any passive smoke exposure or exposure to a husband's smoke and breast cancer risk. There was some evidence of an elevated breast cancer risk associated with passive smoking exposure of 5 hr or more per day in the workplace (OR = 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.4; p for trend = 0.02). This association warrants further investigation.     

SULT1A1 genotype, active and passive smoking, and breast cancer risk by age 50 years in a German case-control study

IntroductionSulfotransferase 1A1 (encoded by SULT1A1) is involved in the metabolism of procarcinogens such as heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, both of which are present in tobacco smoke. We recently reported a differential effect of N-acetyltransferase (NAT) 2 genotype on the association between active and passive smoking and breast cancer. Additional investigation of a common SULT1A1 genetic polymorphism associated with reduced enzyme activity and stability might therefore provide deeper insight into the modification of breast cancer susceptibility.MethodsWe conducted a population-based case–control study in Germany. A total of 419 patients who had developed breast cancer by age 50 years and 884 age-matched control individuals, for whom risk factor information and detailed smoking history were available, were included in the analysis. Genotyping was performed using a fluorescence-based melting curve analysis method. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate breast cancer risk associated with the SULT1A1 Arg²¹³His polymorphism alone and in combination with NAT2 genotype in relation to smoking.ResultsThe overall risk for breast cancer in women who were carriers of at least one SULT1A1*2 allele was not significantly different from that for women with the SULT1A1*1/*1 genotype (adjusted odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.66–1.06). Risk for breast cancer with respect to several smoking variables did not differ substantially between carriers of the *2 allele and noncarriers. However, among NAT2 fast acetylators, the odds ratio associated with passive smoking only (3.23, 95% confidence interval 1.05–9.92) was elevated in homozygous carriers of the SULT1A1*1 allele but not in carriers of the SULT1A1*2 allele (odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.50–3.31).ConclusionWe found no evidence that the SULT1A1 genotype in itself modifies breast cancer risk associated with smoking in women up to age 50 years. In combination with NAT2 fast acetylator status, however, the SULT1A1*1/*1 genotype might increase breast cancer risk in women exposed to tobacco smoke.     

Active cigarette smoking and risk of breast cancer

Although epidemiological evidence on the role of active cigarette smoking in breast cancer risk has been inconsistent, recent literature supports a modest association between smoking and breast cancer. This association is particularly observed in women who smoke for a long duration, or who smoke for a long time prior to their first pregnancy. Here, we provide updated results on cigarette smoking and breast cancer risk in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS). The NBSS is a large cohort of 89,835 women, aged 40–59, who were followed for a mean of 22.1 years, resulting in the ascertainment of 6,549 incident cases of breast cancer. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of cigarette smoking variables with breast cancer risk. We found breast cancer to be associated with duration (40 years vs. 0: HR = 1.57; 95%CI = 1.29–1.92), intensity (40 cigarettes per day vs. 0: HR = 1.21; 95%CI = 1.04–1.40), cumulative exposure (40 pack‐years vs. 0: HR = 1.19; 95%CI = 1.06–1.13) and latency (40 years since initiation vs. 0: HR = 1.19; 95%CI = 1.10–1.53) of cigarette smoking. Number of years smoked prior to first full‐term pregnancy was associated with higher risk of breast cancer than comparative years smoked post‐pregnancy (among parous women, 5 years pre pregnancy vs. 0: HR = 1.18; 95%CI = 1.10–1.26). These results strongly support a role for cigarette smoking in breast cancer etiology and emphasize the importance of timing of this exposure.     

吸烟与原发性肝癌关系的巢式病例对照研究

目的 分析吸烟与上海市区中老年男性原发性肝癌的关系.方法 应用巢式病例对照研究方法,对一个18 244名男性队列随访11年,以队列中213例新发肝癌患者作为病例组,按照患者年龄、采样日期、同居住区等配对条件,从队列中随机抽取1094名健康人作为对照组.使用配对Logistic回归分析,调整可能的混杂因素,估计吸烟对肝癌发生的危险度和95%可信区间(CI).结果 调整肝炎、肝硬化、胆石症或其他胆囊病史及乙型肝炎病毒感染等可能的混杂因素后,男性吸烟者患肝痛的危险性是不吸烟者的1.91倍(95%CI为1.28～2.86),日随着每天吸烟量、吸烟年限和吸烟包年数的增加而增加.每天吸烟≥20支者、吸烟≥40年者和吸烟37包年者患肝癌的相对危险度分别为2.16(95%CI为1.37～3.40)、2.14(95%CI为1.18～3.87)和2.12(95%CI为1.21～3.74).吸烟开始年龄越小,危险性越大,吸烟开始年龄<20岁者患肝癌的危险性为2.57(95%CI为1.50～4.40).结论 吸烟是上海市区男性原发性肝癌的危险因素.     

女性乳腺癌发病危险因素的病例-对照研究

目的 通过病例-对照研究探索女性乳腺癌的危险因素,为制定乳腺癌预防措施提供科学依据.方法 选取1148例初诊的乳腺癌患者作为病例组,根据年龄和月经史按1:2频数匹配健康对照2229例,收集两组的人口学特征资料和体重指数(BMI)、治疗前雌二醇(E2)检测结果,采用单因素和多因素Logistic分析乳腺癌的危险因素.结果 病例组绝经患者占40.59%,对照组绝经者占39.08%.单因素分析中,妊娠、生育、流产、哺乳次数多,初潮年龄晚者,罹患乳腺癌风险降低(P<0.05);BMI越高,罹患乳腺癌的风险越高(P<0.05);而E2水平与罹患乳腺癌风险无关(P>0.05).非条件Logistic多元回归分析显示,初潮年龄、妊娠次数、生育次数均为保护因素.结论 女性乳腺癌发病与月经、生育史有关.妊娠或生育均为乳腺癌的保护因素,初潮年龄越早,罹患乳腺癌的风险越高.     

Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load, and breast cancer risk: A case-control study

Background:Certain types of carbohydrates increase glucoseand insulin levels to a greater extent than others. In turn, insulin mayraise levels of insulin-like growth factors, which may influence breastcancer risk. We analyzed the effect of type and amount of carbohydrateson breast cancer risk, using the glycemic index and the glycemic loadmeasures in a large case-control study conducted in Italy. Patients and methods:Cases were 2569 women with incident,histologically-confirmed breast cancer interviewed between 1991 and1994. Controls were 2588 women admitted to the same hospital network fora variety of acute, non-neoplastic conditions. Average daily glycemicindex and glycemic load were calculated from a validated 78-item foodfrequency questionnaire. Results:Direct associationswith breast cancer risk emerged for glycemic index (odds ratio, OR forhighest vs. lowest quintile = 1.4; Pfor trend <0.01) andglycemic load (OR = 1.3; P< 0.01). High glycemic indexfoods, such as white bread, increased the risk of breast cancer (OR= 1.3) while the intake of pasta, a medium glycemic index food, seemedto have no influence (OR = 1.0). Findings were consistent acrossdifferent strata of menopausal status, alcohol intake, and physicalactivity level. Conclusions:This study supports thehypothesis of moderate, direct associations between glycemic index orglycemic load and breast cancer risk and, consequently, a possible roleof hyperinsulinemia/insulin resistance in breast cancer development.     

Passive smoking and the use of noncigarette tobacco products in association with risk for pancreatic cancer: a case-control study

BACKGROUND: The associations between passive smoking and the use of noncigarette tobacco products with pancreatic cancer are not clear. METHODS: In this case-control study, the authors collected information on passive smoking and the use of noncigarette tobacco products in 808 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 808 healthy controls by personal interview. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: The results confirmed the previously reported association between active smoking and increased risk for pancreatic cancer. The AOR was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.4-2.2) for regular smokers, 1.8 (95% CI, 1.4-2.4) for long-term smokers, and 3.1 (95% CI, 2.2-4.3) for former smokers. Although passive smoking showed a nonsignificantly elevated risk for pancreatic cancer in the entire study population (AOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.7), the association was present among ever smokers (AOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.03-2.6) but was absent among never smokers (AOR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.6). Neither intensity nor duration of passive smoking modified the risk of pancreatic cancer among never smokers. The use of chewing tobacco, snuff, and pipes showed no significant risk elevation for pancreatic cancer after controlling for the confounding effects of demographics and other known risk factors. The use of cigars in never smokers showed a borderline significant increase of risk for pancreatic cancer (AOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.0-4.7; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: The current observations did not support a role for passive smoking or the use of noncigarette tobacco products in the etiology of pancreatic cancer. The association between cigar use and the risk of pancreatic cancer needs to be confirmed in other study populations.     

Cigarette smoking and breast cancer risk: a population-based study in Sweden

In a Swedish population-based case-control study, smoking showed no convincing association with risk of postmenopausal breast cancer - regardless of timing or level of smoking exposure - either overall or among subgroups.     

Passive smoking and lung cancer in Japanese non-smoking women: a prospective study

Although smoking is a major cause of lung cancer, the proportion of lung cancer cases among Japanese women who never smoked is high. As the prevalence of smoking in Japan is relatively high in men but low in women, the development of lung cancer in non-smoking Japanese women may be significantly impacted by passive smoking. We conducted a population-based prospective study established in 1990 for Cohort I and in 1993 for Cohort II. The study population was defined as all residents aged 40-69 years at the baseline survey. 28,414 lifelong non-smoking women provided baseline information on exposure to tobacco smoke from their husband, at the workplace and during childhood. Over 13 years of follow-up, 109 women were newly diagnosed with lung cancer, of whom 82 developed adenocarcinoma. Compared with women married to never smokers, hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for all lung cancer incidence in women who lived with a smoking husband was 1.34 (95% CI 0.81-2.21). An association was clearly identified for adenocarcinoma (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.07-3.86), for which dose-response relationships were seen for both the intensity (p for trend = 0.02) and amount (p for trend = 0.03) of the husband's smoking. Passive smoking at the workplace also increased the risk of lung cancer (HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.85-2.04). Moreover, a higher risk of adenocarcinoma was seen for combined husband and workplace exposure (HR 1.93, 95% CI 0.88-4.23). These findings confirm that passive smoking is a risk factor for lung cancer, especially for adenocarcinoma among Japanese women.     

Lactation and breast cancer risk: a case-control study in Connecticut

In this report, we examined the relationship between lactation and breast cancer risk, in a case-control study of breast cancer, conducted in Connecticut between 1994 and 1998. Included were 608 incident breast cancer cases and 609 age frequency matched controls, aged 30-80 years old. Cases and controls were interviewed by trained study interviewers, using a standardized, structured questionnaire, to obtain information on lactation and other major risk factors. Parous women who reported ever lactation had a borderline significantly reduced risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.63-1.09). An OR of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.27-1.04) was observed in those having breastfed more than 3 children compared to those who never lactated. Women having breastfed their first child for more than 13 months had an OR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.23-0.94) compared to those who never breastfed. Lifetime duration of lactation also showed a risk reduction while none of the ORs were statistically significant. Further stratification by menopausal status showed a risk reduction related to lactation for both pre- and postmenopausal women, while the relationship is less consistent for the latter. These results support an inverse association between breastfeeding and breast cancer risk.     

Alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking in combination: A predictor of contralateral breast cancer risk in the WECARE study

Alcohol drinking and, to a lesser extent, cigarette smoking are risk factors for a first primary breast cancer. Information on these behaviours at diagnosis may contribute to risk prediction of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and they are potentially modifiable. The WECARE Study is a large population‐based case‐control study of women with breast cancer where cases (N = 1,521) had asynchronous CBC and controls (N = 2,212), matched on survival time and other factors, had unilateral breast cancer (UBC). Using multivariable conditional logistic regression to estimate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), we examined the risk of CBC in relation to drinking and smoking history at and following first diagnosis. We adjusted for treatment, disease characteristics and other factors. There was some evidence for an association between CBC risk and current drinking or current smoking at the time of first breast cancer diagnosis, but the increased risk occurred primarily among women exposed to both (RR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.24–2.11). CBC risk was also elevated in women who both smoked and drank alcohol after diagnosis (RR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.18–1.99). In the subset of women with detailed information on amount consumed, smoking an average of ≥10 cigarettes per day following diagnosis was also associated with increased CBC risk (RR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.08–2.08; p‐trend = 0.03). Among women with a diagnosis of breast cancer, information on current drinking and smoking could contribute to the prediction of CBC risk. Women who both drink and smoke may represent a group who merit targeted lifestyle intervention to modify their risk of CBC.     

Risk factors for breast cancer: A case-control study of screen-detected breast cancer in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan

We examined the associations between reproductive factors and the risk of breast cancer on the basis of information from a total of 201,363 breast cancer screening program participants in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan, during 1987-1991. A case-control study method was applied on analysis. Data on 204 breast cancer cases identified and 810 screening year-, age- and screening area-matched normal controls were extracted. After adjustment for potential confounders, a trend of decreasing risk of breast cancer with increasing number of parity was observed (p for trend=0.03). Among parous women, lactation for the last child decreased the risk of breast cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.39–0.94). These findings were consistent with those in clinical breast cancer reported previously. When cases were divided into two age groups, younger ( 49 y.o.) and older (50 y.o. ), family history of breast cancer among mother and sisters (OR=3.51, 95% CI 1.05–11.80), and lactation for the last child (OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.25–0.84) were associated with younger age breast cancer, whereas number of parity was associated with older age breast cancer (p for trend=0.03). The results by age group suggest that different mechanisms may exist in breast cancer developing at early and late onsets.     

Endocrine correlates of male breast cancer risk: a case-control study in Athens, Greece

We studied the relation of certain endocrine-related variables among 23 cases of male breast cancer and 76 apparently healthy male controls. There were significant inverse associations with smoking (P = 0.03), birth order (P = 0.02) and reported frequency of orgasms in later life (P = 0.0004). The study provides strong indirect evidence that endocrine factors are important in the aetiology of male breast cancer.     

The relation of breast size to breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women (United States)

Objective: Breast size has been hypothesized to predict a woman's risk of breast cancer although studies in the main have not supported an association. In a large, population-based case-control study we examined whether breast size might emerge as a significant risk factor among very lean women in whom breast size might be a truer reflection of the volume of gland mass at risk for malignant change.Methods: The data derive from a population-based case- control study of women aged 50 to 79 years conducted in several New England states and Wisconsin. Incident cases of invasive breast cancer (n=2015) were identified through state tumor registries and controls (n=2556) were selected at random within age strata from population lists. Telephone interviews were conducted to obtain information on known and suspected risk factors which included bra dimensions (cup and back size) prior to a first birth, or at the age of 20 for nulliparous women.Results: We observed a significant positive association for cup size which was limited to women who were the most lean as young adults based on chest circumference. Among those reporting a chest size under 34 inches multivariate-adjusted relative risks were 1.34 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.74) for cup size B, and 1.76 (95% CI: 1.04 to 3.01) for cup size C and larger, compared to a cup size smaller than B, and the trend for increasing cup size was statistically significant (P=0.005). There was no relation with breast size among women reporting an average or larger back circumference (34 inches or larger).Conclusion: Breast size before a pregnancy is a positive predictor of postmenopausal breast cancer, but this association is limited to those who were especially lean as young women.     

Tobacco smoking and breast cancer risk: an evaluation based on a systematic review of epidemiological evidence among the Japanese population

BACKGROUND: Our research group undertook an appraisal of the body of epidemiological studies on cancer in Japan to evaluate the existing evidence concerning the association between health-related lifestyles and cancer. As tobacco smoking may be one of the few modifiable risk factors for breast cancer, we focused on the association between tobacco smoking and the risk of breast cancer in this review. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify epidemiological studies on the association between smoking and breast cancer incidence or mortality among the Japanese from 1966 to 2005. Evaluation of associations was based on the strength of evidence and the magnitude of association, together with biological plausibility as previously evaluated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. RESULTS: Three cohort studies and eight case-control studies were identified. The relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR) of breast cancer for current smokers ranged from 0.71 to 6.26 in these studies. A significantly increased risk among current smokers compared with never smokers (RR = 1.7) was reported in one out of the three cohort studies. Moderate or strong associations between smoking and breast cancer risk (OR > 2.0) were observed in four of the eight case-control studies. Experimental studies have supported the biological plausibility of a positive association between tobacco smoking and breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: We conclude that tobacco smoking possibly increases the risk of breast cancer in the Japanese population.     

Diet and premenopausal bilateral breast cancer: A case-control study

We investigated associations between diet and premenopausal bilateral breast cancer in a familial matched case-control study. We studied 140 cases from population-based registries in Los Angeles County (California) and Connecticut, and from the major hospitals in the southern parts of the Province of Quebec. Unaffected sisters of the cases served as matched controls (222 total). Dietary intake were assessed with a food frequency questionnaire. Total fat, monounsaturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, oleic acid, and linoleic acid intake was inversely associated with premenopausal bilateral breast cancer risk. Consumption of carbohydrates (and sweetened beverages) was associated with an increased risk. We observed no associations for dietary fiber, antioxidants, or major food groupings, but we did observe inverse associations for intake of low fat dairy products and tofu. These findings suggest that monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, as well as soy foods, might reduce the risk of premenopausal bilateral breast cancer.     

Gender differences in lung cancer risk by smoking: a multicentre case-control study in Germany and Italy

Several studies in the past have shown appreciably higher lung cancer risk estimates associated with smoking exposure among men than among women, while more recent studies in the USA report just the opposite. To evaluate this topic in a European population we conducted a case-control study of lung cancer in three German and three Italian centres. Personal interviews and standardized questionnaires were used to obtain detailed life-long smoking and occupational histories from 3723 male and 900 female cases and 4075 male and 1094 female controls. Lung cancer risk comparing ever-smokers with never-smokers was higher among men (odds ratios (OR) adjusted for age and centre = 16.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.8-20.3) than among women (OR = 4.2, CI 3.5-5.1). Because the smoking habits of women were different from men, we conducted more detailed analyses using comparable levels of smoking exposure. After restriction to smokers and adjustment for other smoking variables, risk estimates did not differ appreciably between genders. The analysis of duration of smoking (0-19, 20-39, 40+ years) adjusted for cigarette consumption and time since quitting smoking revealed similar risk estimates in men (OR = 1.0, 3.3 [CI 2.6-4.2], 4.1 [CI 3.1-5.6]) and women (OR = 1.0, 2.7 [CI 1.7-4.1], 3.3 [CI 1.9-5.8]). The same was true of the analysis of average or cumulative smoking consumption, and also of analyses stratified by different histological types. We conclude that for comparable exposure to tobacco smoke, the risk of lung cancer is comparable in women and men.