The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy on liver fibrosis progression in primary biliary cirrhosis

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only approved treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, the benefit from UDCA therapy on the progression of PBC from its early stage towards extensive fibrosis and cirrhosis has not been clearly shown. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of UDCA therapy on liver fibrosis progression in PBC. A Markov model was used to analyze the progression rates between early and late histologic stages in 103 patients with PBC enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of UDCA. Early stage was defined by the presence of portal and periportal lesions without extensive fibrosis, whereas late stage was defined by the presence of numerous septa, bridging fibrosis, or cirrhosis. A total of 162 pairs of liver biopsy specimens were studied. The model accurately described the observed data. UDCA therapy was associated with a 5-fold lower progression rate from early stage disease to extensive fibrosis or cirrhosis (7% per year under UDCA vs. 34% per year under placebo, P <.002), but was not associated with a significant difference in regression rates (3% per year under both UDCA and placebo). At 4 years, the probability of UDCA-treated patients to remain in early stage disease is 76% (95% confidence interval: 58%-88%), as compared with 29% (15%-52%) in placebo-treated patients. In conclusion, UDCA therapy significantly delays the progression of liver fibrosis in PBC. Markov modeling should prove useful in assessing the efficacy of future medical treatments in clinical trials involving histologic endpoints.     

The efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate combination therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis: A prospective, multicenter study.

Aim: Treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves the survival of stage I and II primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) patients. However, new therapeutic options are needed for patients who are refractory to UDCA and for those whose disease is at an advanced stage. Bezafibrate could be useful in PBC treatment, since it increases phospholipid output into the bile and reduces the cytotoxicity of hydrophobic bile acids, which are increased with cholestasis. Methods: We conducted two prospective, multicenter randomized open studies in non-cirrhotic patients with PBC to evaluate the efficacy of bezafibrate. One study compared UDCA and bezafibrate monotherapy (study 1: 45 patients [37 females], mean age 55.9 years), and the other evaluated the addition of bezafibrate to patients who were refractory to UDCA (study 2: 21 patients [18 females], mean age 54.1 years). Results: Study 1 demonstrated that bezafibrate monotherapy was as effective as UDCA and study 2 revealed that bezafibrate combined with UDCA was effective in improving and maintaining biliary enzymes where the ineffectiveness of long-term treatment with UDCA was confirmed. Conclusion: This multicenter, randomized, open study revealed that combination therapy of bezafibrate and UDCA improved biliary enzymes in non-cirrhotic Japanese patients with PBC refractory to UDCA. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether combination therapy improves histological staging and prognosis.     

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and transforming growth factor-beta reflect severity of liver damage in primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The pathogenesis of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is unknown. The role of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), and the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in modifying the cytokine environment in patients with PBC has remained largely unstudied. Our aims were to determine: (i) the relationship between serum levels of TNF-alpha and TGF-beta and the severity of PBC; and (ii) the effects of UDCA therapy on TNF-alpha and TGF-beta levels in patients with PBC. METHODS: We studied 90 patients who had been treated with UDCA (53 patients) or placebo (37 patients) for 2 years as part of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Patients were divided into histological stage I/II or stage III/IV disease. Serum TNF-alpha and TGF-beta levels were quantified by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay. RESULTS: Baseline levels of TNF-alpha were significantly greater in patients with stage III/IV compared to stage I/II disease. After 2 years of treatment with UDCA, patients showed a significantly greater decrease in TNF-alpha levels and progression risk score compared to placebo-treated patients. TNF-alpha and TGF-beta levels were significantly reduced compared to baseline levels in the UDCA-treated group after 2 years, while there was no significant change in the levels of placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Serum TNF-alpha and TGF-beta levels may reflect severity of disease in patients with PBC. The beneficial effects of UDCA therapy may be explained by lowering serum levels of these two cytokines.     

Treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis.

Although primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is generally a progressive disease, the rate of progression varies greatly from one patient to another. The terminal phase is characterized by hyperbilirubinaemia (>100 micromol/l), a major decrease in the number of intrahepatic bile ducts, and extensive fibrosis or cirrhosis. It is now well established that orthotopic liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients entering the terminal phase of the disease.A variety of therapeutic agents have been proposed for treatment of patients with PBC. However, most have been found ineffective or too toxic to be widely used. In contrast, there is accumulating evidence from large therapeutic trials that long-term administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is safe and prolongs survival free of liver transplantation. Treatment with UDCA slows the histological progression and delays the onset of cirrhosis.In patients who have a sub-optimal response to UDCA therapy alone, the combination of colchicine or methotrexate with UDCA has minimal or no additional benefit, whereas that with corticosteroids is more promising but not yet demonstrated.Among causes of non-response to UDCA therapy, the most common is the PBC-autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome. The benefit from the combination of corticosteroids and UDCA in this setting is obvious.Further studies are needed to define the patients who are most likely to respond to UDCA therapy and to assess the benefit of combined medical treatments.     

Time course of histological progression in primary biliary cirrhosis

Histological staging is used for stratification and assessment of treatment efficacy in therapeutic trials for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Knowledge of the rate of progression of the histological changes would be helpful in the design (duration) and conduct of clinical trials. The histological stages were recorded for liver biopsies performed annually on 222 patients during a randomized, placebo- controlled clinical trial in which therapy with D-penicillamine (DPCA) was shown to be ineffective. These data were analyzed using a Markov model to describe the time course of histological progression in PBC. At study entry, 15 patients were stage I, 56 were stage II, 96 were stage III, and 55 were stage IV. Histological progression was observed after 1 year in 41%, 43%, and 35% of the patients, and after 2 years in 62%, 62%, and 50% of the patients who were stage I, stage II, and stage III at entry, respectively. After 4 years biopsies showed cirrhosis in 31% and 50% of the patients in stage I and stage II at entry, respectively. A minority (20%) of the precirrhotic patients showed histological stability; sustained histological regression was rarely observed (2%). Our data suggest that a majority of patients with PBC will progress histologically within 2 years. The distribution of histological stages over time may be helpful in determining the number of patients and length of time necessary to appreciate a treatment effect on histological progression in clinical trials for PBC. (Hepatology 1996 Jan;23(1):52-6)     

Long-term effects of mid-dose ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES: The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment on survival and liver histological progression of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) remains uncertain. The aim of this study is to assess the long-term efficacy of mid-dose UDCA treatment for PBC. METHODS: Electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials register, Science Citation Index, and PUBMED (updated to Nov 2005), and manual bibliographical searches were conducted. A meta-analysis of all long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mid-dose UDCA with placebo or no treatment was performed. RESULTS: Seven RCTs and six reports of their extended follow-up including 1,038 patients were assessed. UDCA could significantly improve liver biochemistry, but had no effect on pruritus and fatigue. UDCA could delay the progression of PBC, especially for early-stage patients. Meta-analysis of the seven RCTs including their extended follow-up showed a significant reduction of the incidence of liver transplantation (OR 0.65, p = 0.01), and a marginally significant reduction of the rate of death or liver transplantation (fixed-effect model: OR 0.76, p = 0.05; random-effect model: OR 0.77, p = 0.3) in the UDCA group, except death (OR 1.01, p = 1). In the sensitivity analyses, which included studies administrating placebo as control, long-term studies (> or = 48 months), or large size studies (total number of patients > or = 100), we all found long-term treatment with UDCA could significantly reduce the incidence of liver transplantation, and death or liver transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with mid-dose UDCA can improve liver biochemistry and survival free of liver transplantation in patients with PBC. In addition, UDCA therapy can delay the histological progression in the early-stage patients.     

Serological markers for monitoring disease progression in noncirrhotic primary biliary cirrhosis on ursodeoxycholic acid therapy

Background/Aim: Liver biopsy has so far been the only method to accurately follow the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). The stage and the severity of lymphocytic piecemeal necrosis (LPN) have been shown to be an independent factor for the development of cirrhosis. In this 3‐year prospective study, we evaluated the diagnostic value of several liver function tests, surrogate markers of fibrogenesis, hyaluronic acid (HA), procollagen III N‐terminal peptide (S‐PIIINP), cholestanol and plant sterols in noncirrhotic PBC patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) or with UDCA and budesonide to assess the stage, inflammation and fibrosis. Methods: Seventy‐seven stage I–III PBC patients were included into the study, with control biopsy at 36 months. Serum liver enzymes, bile acids (BA), HA, PIIINP, immunoglobulins, lipids and cholesterol precursors and plant sterols were measured at baseline and at 36 months. Results: Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), HA, BA and PIINP were significantly different between stages I to III and differentiated mild (F0F1) from moderate (F2F3) fibrosis. The combination of these variables (PBC score) exhibited best sensitivity and specificity, compared with AST/platelet ratio, Forns' score and fibrosis index. Using a cut‐off value of 66 for the PBC score, the sensitivity was 81.4% and specificity was 65.2% for classifying the stage of PBC, regarding the stage the and fibrosis in noncirrhotic PBC. Conclusions: Serum HA, BA, PIIINP and AST may serve as valuable simple tools to monitor the treatment response to UDCA in early stages of PBC. Combinations of these biomarkers into a single index further potentiate the diagnostic value of such measurements.     

Silymarin in the treatment of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis with a suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a safe and effective medical therapy for most patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but some patients show an incomplete response. Silymarin is a potent antioxidant with immunomodulatory and antifibrotic properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and assess the efficacy of silymarin in patients with PBC who had shown a suboptimal response to UDCA. Twenty-seven patients with PBC who had been on UDCA (13-15 mg/kg/day) therapy for 7 to 221 months and had shown a persistent elevation of alkaline phosphatase activity at least 2 times the upper limit of normal for more than 6 months were enrolled. Oral silymarin, 140 mg 3 times daily was given for 1 year, and patients continued on the same dosage of UDCA. No significant changes in serum alkaline phosphatase activity (897 +/- 84 vs. 876 +/- 95, P =.5), total bilirubin (0.9 +/- 0.1 vs. 1 +/- 0.1, P =.07), aspartate transaminase (AST) (58 +/- 5 vs. 56 +/- 6, P =.4), albumin (4.0 +/-.06 vs. 4.1 +/-.06, P =.4), or Mayo risk score (3.82 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.88 +/- 0.2, P =.4) were noted after 1 year of treatment with combination therapy. Transitory gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in 2 patients. In conclusion, although silymarin was well tolerated, this medication did not provide benefit to patients with PBC responding suboptimally to UDCA. The results of this pilot study would seem to discourage further controlled trials of silymarin in patients with PBC.     

原发性胆汁性肝硬化停用熊去氧胆酸治疗的前瞻性研究

目的 评价原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者停用熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)的反应.方法 27例经UDCA治疗后肝功能正常>6个月的PBC患者分为A、B两组,A组停用UDCA,B组维持UDCA 13～15 mg·kg-1·d-1治疗,两组患者在性别、年龄、病程等方面相匹配,观察12个月.结果 随访过程中A组1例退出,B组1例失访.A组12例,B组13例.A组2例出现病情进展,占17%,均为血清胆红素升高至正常值2倍以上,分别发生在第3个月和第12个月;B组患者未出现病情进展,两组差异无统计学意义.至观察结束时,A组92%疾病复发,B组为15%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05). A组患者丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).血清胆红素平均水平差异无统计学意义.B组上述指标均维持稳定.结论 对UDCA治疗后肝功能正常的PBC患者需要长期维持UDCA治疗.     

Oral budesonide in the treatment of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis with a suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a safe and effective medical therapy for most patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, some patients show an incomplete response to UDCA therapy. Treatment with corticosteroids may be of benefit although at the expense of systemic side effects. Budesonide, a corticosteroid with an extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism appeared promising for the treatment of PBC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and estimate the efficacy of budesonide in patients with PBC, who have shown a suboptimal response to UDCA. Twenty-two patients with PBC, 16 women, median age of 50 who had been on UDCA (13-15 mg/kg/d) for a mean of 46 months (range 6-108 months) and had shown a persistent elevation of alkaline phosphatase activity at least 2 times the upper limit of normal were enrolled. Oral budesonide, 9 mg daily was administered for 1 year and patients continued on the same dosage of UDCA. There was a significant, but transitory improvement in serum levels of total bilirubin (P =.001) and a significant, but marginal improvement in serum alkaline phsophatase (P =.001) with combination therapy. The Mayo risk score increased significantly (P =.02) and there was a significant loss of bone mass (P <.001) of the lumbar spine. Budesonide-induced hyperglycemia and cosmetic adverse effects were noted in 2 patients. In conclusion, oral budesonide appears to add minimal, if any, additional benefit to UDCA, and it is associated with a significant worsening of osteoporosis in patients with PBC.     

Fibrate for treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis

Recent studies of the effectiveness of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) reported that UDCA therapy did not necessarily stop the progression of liver fibrosis in all patients, even those with early stage PBC. Thus, there is a need for more effective treatments that could prevent asymptomatic PBC from progressing to the icteric stage. Bezafibrate is effective in approximately two-thirds of non-icteric patients who have not shown a complete response to UDCA. Serum bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase and γ-guanosine 5'-triphosphate levelswere significantly lower in patients who responded to additional bezafibrate on univariate analysis. The putative mechanism by which bezafibrate acts in cholestasis is by increasing phospholipid output into bile, which forms micelles with the hydrophobic bile acid that reduces its toxicity.     

Clinical features and treatment outcomes of primary biliary cholangitis in a highly admixed population

Introduction and objectivesLittle is known about primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in non-whites. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical features and outcomes of PBC in a highly admixed population.Material and methodsThe Brazilian Cholestasis Study Group multicentre database was reviewed to assess demographics, clinical features and treatment outcomes of Brazilian patients with PBC.Results562 patients (95% females, mean age 51 ± 11 years) with PBC were included. Concurrent autoimmune diseases and overlap with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) occurred, respectively, in 18.9% and 14%. After a mean follow-up was 6.2 ± 5.3 years, 32% had cirrhosis, 7% underwent liver transplantation and 3% died of liver-related causes. 96% were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and 12% required add-on therapy with fibrates, either bezafibrate, fenofibrate or ciprofibrate. Response to UDCA and to UDCA/fibrates therapy varied from 39%-67% and 42-61%, respectively, according to different validated criteria. Advanced histological stages and non-adherence to treatment were associated with primary non-response to UDCA, while lower baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels correlated with better responses to both UDCA and UDCA/fibrates.Conclusions: Clinical features of PBC in highly admixed Brazilians were similar to those reported in Caucasians and Asians, but with inferior rates of overlap syndrome with AIH. Response to UDCA was lower than expected and inversely associated with histological stage and baseline AST and ALP levels. Most of patients benefited from add-on fibrates, including ciprofibrate. A huge heterogeneity in response to UDCA therapy according to available international criteria was observed and reinforces the need of global standardization.     

Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis and lymphocytic piecemeal necrosis in UDCA-treated patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We have previously shown that the histological stage and severity of lymphocytic piecemeal necrosis (LPN) are independent predictive factors of cirrhosis development in ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-treated patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Our aim during this study was to determine whether biochemical parameters classically used in PBC management and measured under UDCA could be considered as reliable surrogate markers for these histological prognostic indices in clinical practice. METHOD: The study included 153 patients with PBC who had undergone a control liver biopsy after 2 years of UDCA therapy. The relationships between histological and biological features were assessed by variance analysis and logistic regression. The diagnostic value of independent markers was assessed in terms of their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative value (NPV) and receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Two variables were independently associated with extensive fibrosis (i.e. advanced histological stages): serum levels of bilirubin and hyaluronic acid (HA). A fibrosis index ([bilirubin (micromol/l)/14]+[HA (microg/l)/143]) higher than 1.5 exhibited good PPV and specificity (>74%) but rather poor NPV and sensitivity (<64%) regarding a diagnosis of extensive fibrosis. The only independent marker of LPN was aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity. AST activity of more than twice the upper limit of normal showed acceptable PPV (>70%) but very low sensitivity (<25%) for a diagnosis of LPN. CONCLUSIONS: Serum bilirubin and HA levels measured under UDCA therapy are of acceptable diagnostic value for extensive fibrosis, but none of the biochemical tests commonly employed in the management of PBC can be considered as surrogate markers of LPN. Taken together with our previous results, these findings suggest that liver biopsy may be necessary to screen UDCA-treated patients who might require additional therapies.     

Prognosis of ursodeoxycholic Acid-treated patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Results of a 10-yr cohort study involving 297 patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The therapeutic potential of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) remains controversial. In addition, relatively few data have been reported on the outcome of patients who have been treated long term. The aim of the present study was to document long-term survival of a prospectively followed large cohort of UDCA treated patients in comparison to that predicted by the Mayo model and of a matched control cohort of the Dutch population. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-seven patients were included and followed during a median period of 68 (range 3-126) months until death or the end of the study. RESULTS: Survival free of transplantation (1 yr 99.7%, 5 yr 87%, and 10 yr 71%) was significantly better than predicted by the Mayo model (p= 0.01). However, for patients with abnormal serum bilirubin and/or albumin concentrations at entry, observed and predicted survival did not significantly differ. Compared with survival for a standardized cohort of the Dutch population, observed survival for the total group was significantly decreased (p= 0.0003); for noncirrhotic patients and patients with normal entry bilirubin and albumin concentrations survival was comparable. Serum bilirubin and albumin concentrations were the prognostic factors most consistently associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: A 10-year prognosis for most UDCA-treated patients with PBC, i.e., those with a normal bilirubin and albumin concentration, is comparable to that of a matched general population. Our finding that observed survival was significantly better than predicted by the Mayo model may suggest that this model did not accurately predict prognosis in our cohort. Alternatively, this finding indicates an important therapeutic effect of long-term UDCA treatment in PBC, particularly in patients with noncirrhotic, nonadvanced disease.     

The natural history of PBC: has it changed?

The prognosis and natural history of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) have improved significantly during the last few decades. Patients are diagnosed at earlier stages, are more likely to be asymptomatic at diagnosis, and are more likely to receive medical treatment. The survival of asymptomatic patients is longer than the median survival of symptomatic patients. The natural history of PBC has been assessed in the presence of effective therapy, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Evidence suggests that UDCA delays histological progression in PBC and decreases the risk of development of esophageal varices. Survival of UDCA-treated patients is better than that of untreated patients and also is better than that predicted by the Mayo model. For patients in early stages of PBC, UDCA treatment may normalize survival. However, patients with stage III and IV PBC do not respond as well to UDCA. Therefore, there is a continued need for additional treatment in patients with advanced disease.     

Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy and the risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: an observational study

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). The long-term administration of UDCA might indirectly favor colon carcinogenesis by increasing the fecal excretion of secondary bile acids or, in contrast, it might inhibit colon carcinogenesis, as demonstrated in animal models. In patients with PBC, we examined the effect of prolonged UDCA administration on the prevalence and recurrence of colorectal adenoma and on the proliferation of colon epithelial cells. One hundred fourteen patients (103 women, 11 men; mean age, 55 years) with PBC, were enrolled in a colonoscopic surveillance program. The prevalence of colon adenoma was compared in patients already treated with UDCA (mean duration 46 months) at the time of colonoscopy (treated group, n = 52) and in patients undergoing colonoscopy just prior to treatment initiation (untreated group, n = 62). The recurrence of adenoma following removal (mean follow-up, 35 months) was compared between UDCA-treated patients and appropriate age- and gender-matched controls (2/1) selected from a cohort of 205 patients undergoing polypectomy. Epithelial cell proliferation was assessed using anti-Ki67 antibodies on colon biopsies from both treated and untreated patients. Treated and untreated patients displayed similar demographic characteristics. The prevalence of colorectal adenomas was 13% in the treated group versus 24% in the untreated group (P =.16). The colon epithelial cell proliferation index was significantly lower in treated patients than in untreated patients (P =.001). Following removal of the adenoma, the probability of recurrence was significantly lower in patients treated with UDCA than in controls (7% vs. 28% at 3 years, P =.04). In conclusion, this study suggests that, in patients with PBC, the prolonged administration of UDCA (1) is not associated with an increased prevalence of colorectal adenomas, and (2) significantly decreases the probability of colorectal adenoma recurrence following removal. These results are strengthened by the significant reduction in colon epithelial cell proliferation seen in patients treated with UDCA.     

The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy on the natural course of primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We used a multistate modeling approach to assess the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy on the natural course of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), which remains controversial. METHODS: Our population included 262 patients with PBC who had received 13-15 mg/kg UDCA daily for a mean of 8 years (range, 1-22 years). Data were analyzed using a multistate Markov model, with histologic stage progression, death, and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) as main end points. Survival without OLT was compared with that predicted by the updated Mayo model and with the expected survival in the control population. RESULTS: Forty-five patients developed cirrhosis, 20 underwent OLT, and 16 died by the censor date. Ten deaths were due to liver disease. The overall survival rates were 92% at 10 years and 82% at 20 years. Survival rates without OLT were 84% and 66% at 10 and 20 years, respectively, which were slightly lower than the survival rate of an age- and sex-matched control population (relative risk [RR], 1.4; P = .1) but better than the spontaneous survival rate as predicted by the updated Mayo model (RR, .5; P < .01). The survival rate of patients in stage 1 and 2 was similar to that in the control population (RR, .8; P = .5), whereas the probability of death or OLT remained significantly increased in treated patients in late histologic stages (RR, 2.2; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with UDCA alone normalizes the survival rate of patients with PBC when given at early stages. However, there is a continued need for new therapeutic options in patients with advanced disease.     

The association of histological progression with biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is currently diagnosed at an early stage; therefore, the number of patients with PBC without symptoms at the time of diagnosis is increasing. However, up to 30% of patients with PBC exhibit the suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and are at high risk of end-stage liver disease. Obeticholic acid is an approved second-line therapy for patients with PBC that are refractory to UDCA. Novel surrogate endpoints are required to identify individuals eligible for second-line therapies. An inadequate biochemical response to UDCA is a useful predictor of poor outcomes in patients with PBC. In addition to UDCA effects on biochemical parameters, histological outcomes could be considered as candidate surrogate endpoints. Alterations in liver histology are used as surrogate endpoints in clinical studies. However, current staging systems are insufficient to determine PBC disease severity and progression because of the pathological heterogeneity of the disease. Histological features at baseline and biochemical response to UDCA treatment can affect the disease course of PBC. Therefore, novel surrogate endpoints must be represented by parameters characterized by histological outcomes and treatment responses in PBC. In this review, we discuss the existing histological parameters and newly created factors to identify patients with PBC who are at a high risk of developing end-stage liver disease and, consequently, the potential need for additional treatments.     

熊去氧胆酸治疗不同临床分期原发性胆汁性肝硬化的2年随访观察

目的 观察熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)对不同临床分期原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者的长期疗效.方法 91例PBC患者通过自身对照的方法随访观察2年,观察应用UDCA治疗的2年内不同阶段症状、生化学指标及肝组织学病理变化.计数资料以例数或百分比描述,用配对计数资料的x2检验及重复测量数据的方差分析等方法进行统计学分析.结果 Ⅱ期患者完成治疗后6个月,碱性磷酸酶(ALP)及γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)水平下降51.9%和67.3%;治疗1年,其生化学应答率为81.25%(巴黎标准)和93.75%(巴塞罗那标准);治疗2年,ALP及GGT下降65.33%和86.75%,IgM水平于治疗1年后由62.5%降至正常;Ⅲ期患者治疗后6个月,ALP及GGT水平下降48.8%和46.6%,治疗1年生化学应答率为36.84%(巴黎标准)和57.89%(巴塞罗那标准),治疗2年ALP及GGT下降76.16%和78.63%,IgM水平于治疗1年后由28.9%降至正常,乏力、黄疸及瘙痒症状有所好转;Ⅳ期患者治疗后6个月,ALP及GGT下降43.65%和33.39%,治疗1年,生化学应答率为30.43%(巴黎标准)和56.52%(巴塞罗那标准),治疗2年,ALP及GGT下降56.84%和53.06%;IgM水平于治疗1年后,17.4%降至正常,黄疸及瘙痒症状也有所好转.11例不同分期PBC患者于治疗前后行肝活组织检查,其中Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期PBC肝脏组织学基本恢复,Ⅲ期及Ⅳ期PBC可见病理学进展,但炎症细胞浸润减轻.结论 UDCA治疗临床Ⅱ期～Ⅳ期的PBC均出现良好的生化学应答,以Ⅱ期应答率最高,并且可改善PBC患者临床症状.对于Ⅰ～Ⅱ期的患者,UDCA治疗可使肝脏组织学恢复,Ⅲ～Ⅳ期患者治疗后虽可见病理学进展,但其炎症细胞浸润明显减轻.提示早期诊断、早期治疗,应用UDCA长期治疗是治疗该病的关键.     

Primary biliary cirrhosis: incidence and predictive factors of cirrhosis development in ursodiol-treated patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) slows the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, some UDCA-treated patients escape and progress toward cirrhosis and end-stage disease. This study aimed to assess the incidence of cirrhosis in UDCA-treated patients with PBC and to determine the predictive factors of cirrhosis development under this treatment. METHODS: A Markov model was used to describe the progression toward cirrhosis in 183 UDCA-treated patients with PBC. A total of 254 pairs of liver biopsy specimens collected during 655 patient-years were studied. RESULTS: The incidence of cirrhosis after 5 years of UDCA treatment was 4%, 12%, and 59% among patients followed-up from stages I, II, and III, respectively. At 10 years, the incidence was 17%, 27%, and 76%, respectively. The median time for developing cirrhosis from stages I, II, and III was 25 years, 20 years, and 4 years, respectively. The independent predictive factors of cirrhosis development were serum bilirubin greater than 17 mumol/L, serum albumin less than 38 g/L, and moderate to severe lymphocytic piecemeal necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new data about the time course of PBC under UDCA and constitutes a rationale for the design and evaluation of clinical trials aimed to assess the efficacy of drugs associated with UDCA.