Effect of exenatide on beta cell function after islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Islet transplantation can reduce or eliminate the need for insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. Exenatide is a long acting analogue of Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) that augments glucose induced insulin secretion, and may increase beta cell mass. We evaluated the effect of exenatide on insulin secretion after islet transplantation. METHODS: Eleven C-peptide positive islet cell recipients with elevated glucose levels were treated with exenatide for three months. Response was assessed by insulin requirements, meal tolerance tests, and hyperglycemic glucose clamps. RESULTS: Ten patients responded to exenatide. Two patients who had not restarted insulin achieved good glycemic control and one patient who had received 5500 IE/kg in first islet infusion was able to stop insulin. Seven other patients decreased their insulin dose by 39% on exenatide. Hyperglycemic clamp studies showed a rise in second phase insulin release (before exenatide: 246+/-88 pM; during exenatide: 644+/-294 pM, P<0.01). Meal tolerance studies before and one month after stopping exenatide did not show a difference in glucose or C-peptide values. Nausea and vomiting were the major side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Exenatide stimulates insulin secretion in islet transplant recipients. It reduces insulin dose in some patients and may delay the need to resume insulin in others. We did not find any evidence of a trophic effect on islets.     

Fasting parameters for estimation of stimulated β cell function in islet transplant recipients with or without basal insulin treatment

In order to assess β cell secretory capacity after islet transplantation, standardized mixed meal stimulation tests are often used. But these tests are cumbersome and the effect of exogenous insulin on the test results is unclear. The aim of our study was to determine to what extent fasting glycemic indices can estimate stimulated β cell function in islet transplant recipients with and without basal insulin. In total 100 mixed meal stimulation tests, including 31 with concurrent basal insulin treatment, were performed in 36 islet transplant recipients. In a multivariate model, fasting C-peptide and fasting glucose together estimated peak C-peptide with R² = .87 and area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide with a R² = .93. There was a larger increase of glucose during tests in which exogenous insulin was used (+7.9 vs +5.3 mmol/L, P < .001) and exogenous insulin use was associated with a slightly lower estimated peak C-peptide (relative change: −15%, P = .02). In islet transplant recipients the combination of fasting C-peptide and glucose can be used to accurately estimate stimulated β cell function after a mixed meal stimulation test, whether exogenous basal insulin is present or not. These data indicate that graft function can be reliably determined during exogenous insulin treatment and that regular islet graft stimulation tests can be minimized.     

Prevalence of hepatic steatosis after islet transplantation and its relation to graft function

Islet allotransplantation can provide insulin independence in selected individuals with type 1 diabetes. The long-term effects of these transplants on the liver are unknown. Recently, two cases of periportal steatosis after islet transplantation have been described. In this study, we performed ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 30 C-peptide-positive islet transplant recipients to detect steatosis and to explore the association of the radiological findings with clinical and metabolic factors. Steatosis was observed on MRI in six (20%) subjects. Histological findings of hepatic steatosis concurred with the imaging findings. Steatosis completely resolved in one subject whose graft failed. More subjects with steatosis required supplementary exogenous insulin than not (67 vs. 21%; P < 0.05). The clinical features of subjects with and without steatosis were otherwise similar, although C-peptide levels were higher in insulin-independent subjects with steatosis (0.98 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.70 +/- 0.18 nmol/l; P = 0.05), despite similar blood glucose levels. Serum triglycerides and the use of exogenous insulin were associated with increased odds of steatosis in a logistic regression model (chi(2) [degrees freedom] = 13.6 [2]); P = 0.001). MRI-detected steatosis is a common finding; the steatosis appears to be due to a paracrine action of insulin secreted from intrahepatic islets. Hepatic steatosis may be associated with insulin resistance or graft dysfunction.     

Effect of glucagon-like peptide 1(7-36) amide on glucose effectiveness and insulin action in people with type 2 diabetes

Although it is well established that glucagon-like peptide 1(7-36) amide (GLP-1) is a potent stimulator of insulin secretion, its effects on insulin action and glucose effectiveness are less clear. To determine whether GLP-1 increases insulin action and glucose effectiveness, subjects with type 2 diabetes were studied on two occasions. Insulin was infused during the night on both occasions to ensure that baseline glucose concentrations were comparable. On the morning of study, either GLP-1 (1.2 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or saline were infused along with somatostatin and replacement amounts of glucagon. Glucose also was infused in a pattern mimicking that typically observed after a carbohydrate meal. Insulin concentrations were either kept constant at basal levels (n = 6) or varied so as to create a prandial insulin profile (n = 6). The increase in glucose concentration was virtually identical on the GLP-1 and saline study days during both the basal (1.21 +/- 0.15 vs. 1.32 +/- 0.19 mol/l per 6 h) and prandial (0.56 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.56 +/- 0.10 mol/l per 6 h) insulin infusions. During both the basal and prandial insulin infusions, glucose disappearance promptly increased after initiation of the glucose infusion to rates that did not differ on the GLP-1 and saline study days. Suppression of endogenous glucose production also was comparable on the GLP-1 and saline study days during both the basal (-2.7 +/- 0.3 vs. -3.1 +/- 0.2 micromol/kg) and prandial (-3.1 +/- 0.4 vs. -3.0 +/- 0.6 pmol/kg) insulin infusions. We conclude that when insulin and glucagon concentrations are matched, GLP-1 has negligible effects on either insulin action or glucose effectiveness in people with type 2 diabetes. These data strongly support the concept that GLP-1 improves glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes by increasing insulin secretion, by inhibiting glucagon secretion, and by delaying gastric emptying rather than by altering extrapancreatic glucose metabolism.     

The GLP-1 derivative NN2211 restores beta-cell sensitivity to glucose in type 2 diabetic patients after a single dose

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) stimulates insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner, but its short half-life limits its therapeutic potential. We tested NN2211, a long-acting GLP-1 derivative, in 10 subjects with type 2 diabetes (means +/- SD: age 63 +/- 8 years, BMI 30.1 +/- 4.2 kg/m(2), HbA(1c) 6.5 +/- 0.8%) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. A single injection (7.5 micro g/kg) of NN2211 or placebo was administered 9 h before the study. beta-cell sensitivity was assessed by a graded glucose infusion protocol, with glucose levels matched over the 5-12 mmol/l range. Insulin secretion rates (ISRs) were estimated by deconvolution of C-peptide levels. Findings were compared with those in 10 nondiabetic volunteers during the same glucose infusion protocol. In type 2 diabetic subjects, NN2211, in comparison with placebo, increased insulin and C-peptide levels, the ISR area under the curve (AUC) (1,130 +/- 150 vs. 668 +/- 106 pmol/kg; P < 0.001), and the slope of ISR versus plasma glucose (1.26 +/- 0.36 vs. 0.54 +/- 0.18 pmol x l[min(-1) x mmol(-1) x kg(-1)]; P < 0.014), with values similar to those of nondiabetic control subjects (ISR AUC 1,206 +/- 99; slope of ISR versus plasma glucose, 1.44 +/- 0.18). The long-acting GLP-1 derivative, NN2211, restored beta-cell responsiveness to physiological hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetic subjects.     

A comparison of troglitazone and metformin on insulin requirements in euglycemic intensively insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients

Troglitazone and metformin lower glucose levels in diabetic patients without increasing plasma insulin levels. We compared the insulin sparing actions of these two agents and their effects on insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in 20 type 2 diabetic patients. To avoid the confounding effect of improved glycemic control on insulin action and secretion, patients were first rendered euglycemic with 4 weeks of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) before randomization to CSII plus troglitazone (n = 10) or CSII plus metformin (n = 10); euglycemia was maintained for another 6-7 weeks. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp 1) at baseline, 2) after 4 weeks of CSII, and 3) after CSII plus either troglitazone or metformin. The 24-h glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles were performed on the day before the second and third glucose clamps. Good glycemic control was achieved with CSII alone and was maintained with CSII plus an oral agent (mean 24-h glucose: troglitazone, 6.2+/-0.6 mmol/l; metformin, 6.2 +/-0.3 mmol/l). Insulin requirements decreased 53% with troglitazone compared with CSII alone (48+/-4 vs. 102+/-13 U/day, P < 0.001), but only 31% with metformin (76+/-13 vs. 110+/-18 U/day, P < 0.005). The 24-h C-peptide profiles were similar. Normal fasting hepatic glucose output was maintained with both agents despite lower insulin levels than on CSII alone. Insulin sensitivity did not change significantly with CSII alone or with CSII plus metformin, but improved 29% with CSII plus troglitazone (P < 0.005 vs. CSII alone) and was then 45% higher than in the CSII plus metformin patients (P < 0.005). In conclusion, metformin has no effect on insulin-stimulated glucose disposal independent of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Troglitazone (600 mg/day) has greater insulin-sparing effects than metformin (1,700 mg/day) in CSII-treated euglycemic patients. This is probably explained by the peripheral tissue insulin-sensitizing effects of troglitazone.     

Five-year follow-up after clinical islet transplantation

Islet transplantation can restore endogenous beta-cell function to subjects with type 1 diabetes. Sixty-five patients received an islet transplant in Edmonton as of 1 November 2004. Their mean age was 42.9 +/- 1.2 years, their mean duration of diabetes was 27.1 +/- 1.3 years, and 57% were women. The main indication was problematic hypoglycemia. Forty-four patients completed the islet transplant as defined by insulin independence, and three further patients received >16,000 islet equivalents (IE)/kg but remained on insulin and are deemed complete. Those who became insulin independent received a total of 799,912 +/- 30,220 IE (11,910 +/- 469 IE/kg). Five subjects became insulin independent after one transplant. Fifty-two patients had two transplants, and 11 subjects had three transplants. In the completed patients, 5-year follow-up reveals that the majority ( approximately 80%) have C-peptide present post-islet transplant, but only a minority ( approximately 10%) maintain insulin independence. The median duration of insulin independence was 15 months (interquartile range 6.2-25.5). The HbA(1c) (A1C) level was well controlled in those off insulin (6.4% [6.1-6.7]) and in those back on insulin but C-peptide positive (6.7% [5.9-7.5]) and higher in those who lost all graft function (9.0% [6.7-9.3]) (P < 0.05). Those who resumed insulin therapy did not appear more insulin resistant compared with those off insulin and required half their pretransplant daily dose of insulin but had a lower increment of C-peptide to a standard meal challenge (0.44 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.76 +/- 0.06 nmol/l, P < 0.001). The Hypoglycemic score and lability index both improved significantly posttransplant. In the 128 procedures performed, bleeding occurred in 15 and branch portal vein thrombosis in 5 subjects. Complications of immunosuppressive therapy included mouth ulcers, diarrhea, anemia, and ovarian cysts. Of the 47 completed patients, 4 required retinal laser photocoagulation or vitrectomy and 5 patients with microalbuminuria developed macroproteinuria. The need for multiple antihypertensive medications increased from 6% pretransplant to 42% posttransplant, while the use of statin therapy increased from 23 to 83% posttransplant. There was no change in the neurothesiometer scores pre- versus posttransplant. In conclusion, islet transplantation can relieve glucose instability and problems with hypoglycemia. C-peptide secretion was maintained in the majority of subjects for up to 5 years, although most reverted to using some insulin. The results, though promising, still point to the need for further progress in the availability of transplantable islets, improving islet engraftment, preserving islet function, and reducing toxic immunosuppression.     

Physiological importance of deficiency in early prandial insulin secretion in non-insulin-dependent diabetes

Patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) have a deficiency in early prandial insulin secretion. To determine the contribution of this early deficiency to prandial hyperglycemia, exogenous intravenous insulin (1.8 U over 30 min) was delivered to eight NIDDM subjects in a profile designed to simulate the normal initial rise in insulin levels. The same dose of insulin was also administered 1) in the same profile but delayed by 30 min and 2) as a constant infusion over 180 min. Augmentation of the early insulin response caused a 33 +/- 4% reduction in the glycemic response to a mixed meal (P less than .005); the peak blood glucose increment above baseline was reduced by 1.4 mM (P less than .005) to an increment identical to nondiabetic subjects (3.3 +/- 0.3 vs. 3.2 +/- 0.2 mM), and blood glucose levels were still 0.9 mM lower after 180 min (P less than .05). In contrast, the delayed profile or constant infusion did not significantly alter the glycemic response to the meal. Early insulin augmentation resulted in elevated peripheral insulin levels initially (peak level 81 +/- 11 mU/L), but subsequent insulin and C-peptide levels were lower than in the control study (at 180 min after the meal, 22 +/- 5 vs. 33 +/- 8 mU/L, P less than .05, and 4.0 +/- 0.5 vs. 5.3 +/- 0.6 micrograms/L, P less than .02, respectively). Early insulin delivery caused free-fatty acid (FFA) levels to fall at a faster rate after the meal and also attenuated the initial rise in glucagon levels typical of NIDDM.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Impaired beta-cell function, incretin effect, and glucagon suppression in patients with type 1 diabetes who have normal fasting glucose

We have recently described a novel phenotype in a group of subjects with type 1 diabetes that is manifested by glucose >11.1 mmol/l 120 min after an oral glucose load, but with normal fasting glucose levels. We now describe the metabolic characteristics of these subjects by comparing parameters of islet hormone secretion and glucose disposal in these subjects to age-matched nondiabetic control subjects. The patients with type 1 diabetes had fasting glucose, insulin, and glucagon values similar to those of control subjects. Additionally, the insulin secretory response to intravenous arginine at euglycemia was similar in the control and diabetic groups (264 +/- 33.5 and 193 +/- 61.3 pmol/l; P = 0.3). However, marked differences in beta-cell function were found in response to hyperglycemia. Specifically, the first-phase insulin response was lower in diabetic subjects (329.1 +/- 39.6 vs. 91.3 +/- 34.1 pmol/l; P < 0.001), as was the slope of glucose potentiation of the insulin response to arginine (102 +/- 18.7 vs. 30.2 +/- 6.1 pmol/l per mmol/l; P = 0.005) and the maximum insulin response to arginine (2,524 +/- 413 vs. 629 +/- 159 pmol/l; P = 0.001). Although plasma levels of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) did not differ between control and diabetic subjects, the incretin effect was lower in the diabetic patients (70.3 +/- 5.4 vs. 52.1 +/- 5.9%; P = 0.03). Finally, there was a lack of suppression of glucagon in the patients after both oral and intravenous glucose administration, which may have contributed to their postprandial hyperglycemia. Glucose effectiveness did not differ between patients and control subjects, nor did insulin sensitivity, although there was a tendency for the patients to be insulin resistant (9.18 +/- 1.59 vs. 5.22 +/- 1.17 pmol.(-1).min(-1); P = 0.08). These data characterize a novel group of subjects with type 1 diabetes manifested solely by hyperglycemia following an oral glucose load in whom islet function is normal at euglycemia, but who have marked defects in both alpha- and beta-cell secretion at hyperglycemia. This pattern of abnormalities may be characteristic of islet dysfunction early in the development of type 1 diabetes.     

Suppression, stress, and accommodation of transplanted islets of Langerhans

Successful intrasplenic islet autotransplantation in dogs requires an islet cell mass considerably greater than what might be expected based on studies of subtotal pancreatectomy. Grafts of marginal function ultimately fail, suggesting severe limitations in the capacity of an islet graft to adapt. Accommodation was tested in established intrasplenic grafts by either chronically stressing the graft with mild carbohydrate intolerance induced by exogenous corticosteroids or chronically suppressing the graft with exogenous insulin. After these manipulations, insulin output into the portal vein in response to intravenous (i.v.) glucose was measured and compared with that of normal dogs and dogs receiving islet autografts with no further treatment with either steroids or insulin. Transplanted islets tolerated the two manipulations well in that neither exogenous steroid nor insulin led to failure of the graft as a consequence of either stress or protracted diminished demand. The major determinant of successful islet grafting is the endocrine competence of the initial graft. If that competence is provided at the outset, the graft can adapt to a considerable range of demand for insulin secretion.     

Effects of aging on insulin secretion

Aging is associated with hyperinsulinemia, but reports vary on the contributions of altered insulin clearance versus insulin secretion to this phenomenon. To elucidate the role of insulin secretion in the hyperinsulinemia of aging, 10 elderly (age 66 +/- 4 yr, body mass index 25 +/- kg/m2) and 8 young (age 30 +/- 5 yr, body mass index 24 +/- 3 kg/m2) subjects were studied to determine rates of insulin secretion in response to fasting, mixed meals, and intravenous glucose administration. Insulin secretion was determined with a two-compartment model based on individual C-peptide kinetic parameters derived after bolus injection of biosynthetic human C-peptide. Basal insulin secretion rates were increased in elderly subjects (82.5 +/- 9.0 vs. 62.8 +/- 6.1 pmol.min-1.m-2; P less than .05). This was reflected in elevated serum insulin levels in elderly subjects (62.8 +/- 10.1 vs. 41.1 +/- 5.0 pM, P less than .05). During a 24-h mixed-meal profile, elderly subjects had an increase in their glucose response (P less than .01 by analysis of variance [ANOVA]) and total insulin secretion (261 +/- 28 vs. 195 +/- 22 nmol.24 h-1.m-2; P less than .05) compared with young subjects. However, the relative total increases in both glycemia and insulin secretion, calculated as a function of basal levels, were similar between the groups (both NS). To experimentally control for differences in glycemia, both groups underwent a 16.8-mM hyperglycemic clamp and a stepped intravenous glucose infusion to match glycemia. Under these steady-state and dynamic conditions, insulin secretion profiles were nearly identical (NS by ANOVA).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Acute insulin responses to glucose and arginine as predictors of beta-cell secretory capacity in human islet transplantation

Islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes can enable the achievement of near-normal glycemic control without severe hypoglycemic episodes. How much an islet (beta-cell) graft may be contributing to glycemic control can be quantified by stimulatory tests of insulin (or C-peptide) secretion. Glucose-potentiation of arginine-induced insulin secretion provides a measure of functional beta-cell mass, the beta-cell secretory capacity, as either AIR(pot) or AIR(max), but requires conduct of a hyperglycemic clamp. We sought to determine whether acute insulin responses to intravenous glucose (AIR(glu)) or arginine (AIR(arg)) could predict beta-cell secretory capacity in islet recipients. AIR(arg) was a better predictor of both AIR(pot) and AIR(max) (n=10, r2=0.98, P<0.0001 and n=7, r2=0.97, P<0.0001) than was AIR(glu) (n=9, r2=0.78, P=0.002 and n=6, r2=0.76, P=0.02). Also, the measures of beta-cell secretory capacity were highly correlated (n=7, r2=0.98, P<0.0001). These results support the use of AIR(arg) as a surrogate indicator of beta-cell secretory capacity in islet transplantation.     

Characteristics and transplantation of the porcine neonatal pancreatic cell clusters isolated from 1- to 3-day-old versus 1-month-old pigs

Porcine neonatal pancreatic cell clusters (NPCCs) isolated from 1- to 3-day-old pigs (I-A) cured diabetic nude mice within 8 weeks after transplantation. To shorten the latent period between transplantation and reversal of hyperglycemia, we studied NPCCs isolated from 1-month-old pigs (I-B). One- to 3-day-old or 1-month-old pig pancreata were cut into fragments, digested by collagenase, and then studied for islet characteristics. In addition, 300 cultured NPCCs were transplanted under kidney capsule of nondiabetic nude mice. At 1 and 3 months after transplantation, the grafts were removed to measure the insulin content and beta-cell mass. Immediately after isolation, I-B was larger than I-A (0.211 +/- 0.006 vs 0.189 +/- 0.003 mm(2), P =.0003) and after a 6-day culture period, I-B contained more insulin than I-A (6.8 +/- 1.4 vs 2.3 +/- 0.2 microg/150 NPCCs, P =.02). However, the stimulation indices of I-A and I-B during static incubation with 500 mg/dL glucose (26.5 +/- 3.2 vs 23.9 +/- 1.7) or 500 mg/dL glucose plus 50 mol/L IBMX (41.9 +/- 4.4 vs 62.2 +/- 14.0) were not significantly different. Furthermore, neither I-A nor I-B showed first or second phase insulin secretion during sequential perifusion with 100 or 300 mg/dL glucose. In nondiabetic recipients, the insulin content of the graft at 1 month after transplantation was 0.3 +/- 0.0 and 0.3 +/- 0.1 microg, and the beta-cell mass of the graft at 3 months was 0.069 +/- 0.022 and 0.067 +/- 0.023 mg in mice receiving I-A or I-B, respectively (P >.05). Our data indicate NPCCs isolated from 1- to 3-day-old and 1-month-old pigs have different characteristics but similar transplantation effects.     

Incretin effect due to increased secretion and decreased clearance of insulin in normal humans

To assess the contribution of changes in insulin secretion and clearance to the incretin effect (greater insulinemia after oral than after intravenous glucose), 10 healthy subjects were studied after oral glucose (1 g/kg body wt) and again when glucose was infused intravenously at rates to match arterialized plasma glucose concentrations after oral glucose. Although basal and integrated plasma glucose did not differ between oral and intravenous glucose, integrated responses of insulin (3.3 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.4 mU ml-1.240 min-1, P less than .001), C-peptide (456.5 +/- 58.5 vs. 327.9 +/- 46.3 ng.ml-1.240 min-1, P = .002), gastric inhibitory polypeptide, (16.8 +/- 3.5 vs. -2.8 +/- 1.0 micrograms.ml-1.240 min-1, P less than .001), and insulin secretion (6.6 +/- 1.1 vs. 4.7 +/- 0.7 U.240 min-1, P = .003) were greater with oral than intravenous glucose. However, insulin clearance, whether calculated as the molar ratio of integrated C-peptide to integrated insulin responses (6.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 14.2 +/- 3.8, P = .005) or from the formula insulin clearance equals insulin secretion divided by integrated insulin responses (1.1 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.7 L.min-1.m-2, respectively, P = .002), was less for oral than for intravenous glucose. Therefore, the incretin effect is mediated both by increased secretion and decreased clearance of insulin.     

No improvement of pancreas transplant endocrine function by exogenous insulin infusion (islet rest) in the postoperative period

The concept of islet exhaustion maintains that exposure of pancreatic islets to hyperglycemia and other stresses leads to islet dysfunction and irreparable damage. The process of pancreatic transplantation places many stresses on islets (e.g., counter-regulatory hormones, steroids, cyclosporine toxicity). As practiced by some centers, it may be important to administer exogenous insulin in the postoperative period to provide islet rest. Using a porcine pancreas transplant model that simulates clinical transplantation, we studied 2 groups: 1 group (n = 8) received constant insulin infusion for 7 days after transplantation; the control group (n = 5) received vehicle only. The islets in the insulin infusion group were rested as evidenced by a significantly decreased mean C-peptide level (0.27 +/- 0.04 ng/ml) as compared to the control group (0.66 +/- 0.08 ng/ml) (P less than 0.05). After insulin infusion was discontinued, intravenous glucose tolerance testing found insulin, C-peptide and glucagon responses were not different between groups. Glucose clearance was also comparable; K values were -1.79 and -1.60 in the insulin infusion and control groups, respectively. In conclusion, islet rest by insulin infusion for 7 postoperative days did not improve subsequent pancreas transplant endocrine function.     

Islet amyloid polypeptide response to glucose, insulin, and somatostatin analogue administration

We determined islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) response in plasma to oral and intravenous glucose administration and intravenous insulin injection in nondiabetic subjects. Moreover, we studied the effect of somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995 on glucose-induced IAPP secretion in nondiabetic subjects. Plasma IAPP concentration was determined by radioimmunoassay. Oral administration of 75 g glucose (n = 8) significantly increased plasma IAPP levels from 4.5 +/- 0.7 to 14.0 +/- 1.7 pM (P less than 0.01) 60 min after administration. Intravenous administration of 10 g glucose (n = 7) also caused a significant increase in plasma IAPP from 5.0 +/- 0.4 to 11.6 +/- 0.9 pM (P less than 0.01) 5 min after injection. Plasma IAPP significantly decreased from 5.1 +/- 0.4 to 2.9 +/- 0.4 pM (P less than 0.01) 60 min after intravenous insulin injection (n = 8). Pretreatment with SMS 201-995 completely abolished IAPP and insulin secretion to intravenous glucose injection. A significant correlation was found between plasma IAPP and insulin levels in oral and intravenous glucose administration and between plasma IAPP and C-peptide levels during insulin-induced hypoglycemia. These results suggest that IAPP is cosecreted with insulin in response to a glucose load and secretion of IAPP is inhibited by hypoglycemia and somatostatin. IAPP may serve as a novel pancreatic hormone to control carbohydrate metabolism.     

The role of current product release criteria for identification of human islet preparations suitable for clinical transplantation

BACKGROUND: Alloimmunity, autoimmunity, and nonspecific inflammation are known to be potential determinants for long-term islet survival and insulin independence. Sufficient islet mass is a key determinant. But islet engraftment and posttransplant survival may also depend on functional characteristics of the graft. This study investigated the significance of current product release criteria for the transplantation outcome. METHODS: Fourty five consecutive transplanted human islet preparations and their functional outcomes were analyzed. Islet mass was determined according to standard criteria: purity by light microscopy, viability by dye exclusion and Insulin secretory response to static glucose incubation. Islet graft function was monitored for > or = 1 year. Islet function was defined as full (FF), partial (PF), or nonfunction (NF) based on serum C-peptide levels and insulin independence. RESULTS: All islet grafts displayed primary function. Islet mass [IEQ/kg BW]: 7331.3 +/- 679.7 (FF), 5821.3 +/- 546.7 (PF), 6468.6 +/- 658.5 (NF), (FF vs PF p = .032) Purity [%] 86.9 +/- 3.1 (FF), 76.0 +/- 2.87 (PF), 88.2 +/- 2.3 (NF) (FF vs PF P =.045, PF vs NF, P = 0.01). (4) Viability [%]:89.2 +/- 2 (FF), 86.2 +/- 1.7 (PF), 87.3 +/- 1.8 (NF) (ns). Stimulation index (SI): 20 +/- 6.3 (FF), 80.2 +/- 28.2 (PF), 21.6 +/- 3.5 (NF) (ns) No correlation was observed between SI and any other parameter nor between SI and C-peptide levels. Islet mass significantly correlated with C-peptide levels at 6 and 12 months after transplantation for functioning grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Stringent product release criteria allow identification of islet preparations suitable for clinical transplantation. However, currently used parameters are not predictive of long-term graft function, indicating that further refined quality assessments including apoptosis and resistance to early inflammation, are required to assess the primary engrafted islet mass.     

Effect of glyburide on glycemic control, insulin requirement, and glucose metabolism in insulin-treated diabetic patients

Glycemic control and glucose metabolism were examined in 5 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and 8 insulin-treated non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients before and after 2 mo of therapy with glyburide (20 mg/day). Glycemic control was assessed by daily insulin requirement, 24-h plasma glucose profile, glucosuria, and glycosylated hemoglobin. Insulin secretion was evaluated by glucagon stimulation of C-peptide secretion, and insulin sensitivity was determined by a two-step euglycemic insulin clamp (1 and 10 mU X kg-1. X min-1) performed with indirect calorimetry and [3-3H]glucose. In the IDDM patients, the addition of glyburide produced no change in daily insulin dose (54 +/- 8 vs. 53 +/- 7 U/day), mean 24-h glucose level (177 +/- 20 vs. 174 +/- 29 mg/dl), glucosuria (20 +/- 6 vs. 35 +/- 12 g/day) or glycosylated hemoglobin (10.1 +/- 1.0 vs. 9.5 +/- 0.7%). Furthermore, there was no improvement in basal hepatic glucose production (2.1 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.1 mg X kg-1 X min-1), suppression of hepatic glucose production by low- and high-dose insulin infusion, or in any measure of total, oxidative, or nonoxidative glucose metabolism in the basal state or during insulin infusion. C-peptide levels were undetectable (less than 0.01 pmol/ml) in the basal state and after glucagon infusion and remained undetectable after glyburide therapy. In contrast to the IDDM patients, the insulin-treated NIDDM subjects exhibited significant reductions in daily insulin requirement (72 +/- 6 vs. 58 +/- 9 U/day), mean 24-h plasma glucose concentration (153 +/- 10 vs. 131 +/- 5 mg/dl), glucosuria (14 +/- 5 vs. 4 +/- 1 g/day), and glycosylated hemoglobin (10.3 +/- 0.7 vs. 8.0 +/- 0.4%) after glyburide treatment (all P less than or equal to .05). However, there was no change in basal hepatic glucose production (1.7 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.1 mg X kg-1 X min-1), suppression of hepatic glucose production by insulin, or insulin sensitivity during the two-step insulin-clamp study. Both basal (0.14 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.32 +/- 0.05 pmol/ml, P less than .05) and glucagon-stimulated (0.24 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.44 +/- 0.09 pmol/ml) C-peptide levels rose after 2 mo of glyburide therapy and both were correlated with the decrease in insulin requirement (basal: r = .65, P = .08; glucagon stimulated: r = .93, P less than .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)