Incontinent women have altered pelvic floor muscle contraction patterns

PURPOSE: Pelvic floor exercises are invaluable for regaining continence but mechanisms are not fully understood. To contribute to the understanding of these mechanisms we investigated the contraction sequence of superficial vs deep pelvic floor muscles in 6 positions in continent and incontinent women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The onset of contraction of the superficial and deep pelvic floor muscles was recorded by perineal and intravaginal surface electromyography in 32 continent and 50 incontinent women. The agreement between perineal and intravaginal recordings was calculated with the kappa statistic and the percent of agreement. Differences in onset between superficial and deep pelvic floor muscle contractions are reported as the median and IQR. RESULTS: Perineal and intravaginal electromyography recordings used to define the onset of muscle activity showed a high level of agreement. In the continent group the superficial muscles almost always contracted before the deep muscles in all 6 positions. In the incontinent group the reverse sequence was observed in 3 of 6 positions. Higher and less consistent time differences in the onset of contraction of the 2 muscle layers were found in incontinent vs continent women. CONCLUSIONS: Contractions of the superficial and deep pelvic floor muscles can be recorded by intravaginal or perineal electrodes. A consistent contraction sequence can be found in continent women but it is lacking in incontinent women. This might be a possible explanation for incontinence. Including differentiated muscle contraction exercises in pelvic floor muscle exercise programs may further optimize treatment outcomes.     

盆底功能障碍性疾病患者盆底肌训练依从性评估的研究进展

介绍了依从性概念、盆底肌训练依从性判断标准，以及对国内外盆底功能障碍性疾病患者盆底肌训练依从性的评估方法，包括主观评估方法、客观评估方法，并对主观评估工具和客观评估工具进行比较分析，以期为医护人员选择合适的评估方法和干预依从性不佳行为提供参考。     

Transabdominal ultrasound measurement of pelvic floor muscle activity when activated directly or via a transversus abdominis muscle contraction

AIMS: The purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of instruction to contract the pelvic floor muscles (PFM), the transversus abdominis (TrA), and the TrA + PFM visualized as displacement of the pelvic floor by ultrasound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty female physical therapists, mean age 41.1 years (range 26-56) participated in the study. A 3.5 MHz 35 mm curved linear array ultrasound transducer (Dornier Medtech) was placed in the mid-sagittal plane immediately suprapubically, angled at 15-30 degrees from the vertical depending on subcutaneous fat and anatomical variations, to image the pelvic floor. Six trials of three maneuvers in random order were performed: contraction of PFM, TrA, and TrA + PFM. RESULTS: In spite of correct contractions assessed by palpation and clinical observation, one subject demonstrated a downward movement of the pelvic floor during PFM contraction on ultrasound. Six subjects (30%) showed a downward movement during a TrA- contraction, and two during the combined TrA + PFM contraction. Instruction to contract PFM produced significantly greater mean displacement: 11.2 mm (95% CI 7.2-15.3) than TrA 4.3 mm (95% CI -0.2-8.8), P < 0.01, and combination: 8.5 mm (95% CI 5.2-12), P = 0.04. Hence, instruction of PFM contraction produced a 61.6% greater displacement of the pelvic floor in the correct direction than a TrA contraction. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that ultrasound is a more valid method than palpation and clinical observation to assess PFM function, and that instruction to contract the PFM produces a significantly more effective pelvic floor muscle contraction than instruction to perform a TrA contraction.     

The evaluation of pelvic floor muscle strength in women with pelvic floor dysfunction: A reliability and correlation study

Aims

The purposes of this study were: (i) to evaluate the reliability of vaginal palpation, vaginal manometry, vaginal dynamometry; and surface (transperineal) electromyography (sEMG), when evaluating pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and/or activation; and (ii) to determine the associations among PFM strength measured using these assessments.

Methods

One hundred and fifty women with pelvic floor disorders participated on one occasion, and 20 women returned for the same investigations by two different raters on 3 different days. At each session, PFM strength was assessed using palpation (both the modified Oxford Grading Scale and the Levator ani testing), manometry, and dynamometry; and PFM activation was assessed using sEMG.

Results

The interrater reliability of manometry, dynamometry, and sEMG (both root‐mean‐square [RMS] and integral average) was high (Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient [CCC] = 0.95, 0.93, 0.91, 0.86, respectively), whereas the interrater reliability of both palpation grading scales was low (Cohen's Kappa [k] = 0.27‐0.38). The intrarater reliability of manometry (CCC = 0.96), and dynamometry (CCC = 0.96) were high, whereas intrarater reliability of both palpation scales (k = 0.78 for both), and of sEMG (CCC = 0.79 vs 0.80 for RMS vs integral average) was moderate. The Bland‐Altman plot showed good inter and intrarater agreement, with little random variability for all instruments. The correlations among palpation, manometry, and dynamometry were moderate (coefficient of determination [r²] ranged from 0.52 to 0.75), however, transperineal sEMG amplitude was only weakly correlated with all measures of strength (r² = 0.23‐0.30).

Conclusions

Manometry and dynamometry are more reliable tools than vaginal palpation for the assessment of PFM strength in women with pelvic floor disorders, especially when different raters are involved. The different PFM strength measures used clinically are moderately correlated; whereas, PFM activation recorded using transperineal sEMG is only weakly correlated with PFM strength. Results from perineal sEMG should not be interpreted in the context of reporting PFM strength.     

阴道锥体训练联合生物反馈盆底肌治疗尿失禁老年人盆底肌康复研究现状

目的研究阴道锥体训练联合生物反馈盆底肌治疗尿失禁老年人的临床疗效及对盆底肌的影响。方法选取84例从2016年9月至2018年3月本院收治的尿失禁老年患者进行研究,以随机抽签法将其均分为联合组及对照组,每组42例。对照组予以常规盆底肌训练治疗,联合组则予以阴道锥体训练联合生物反馈盆底肌治疗。对比两组在临床疗效、治疗前后盆底肌力情况、治疗前后尿动力学参数指标水平以及生活质量变化情况等方面的差异。结果联合组与对照组在总有效率方面比较,前者高于后者(P<0.05)。治疗后联合组盆底肌力分级为Ⅳ级、Ⅴ级的人数占比相比对照组较高(P<0.05)。治疗后联合组与对照组在VLPP、PMUC水平方面比较,前者高于后者(P<0.05)。治疗后联合组与对照组I-QOL评分相比治疗前较高,且联合组相比对照组较高(P<0.05)。结论阴道锥体训练联合生物反馈盆底肌治疗老年尿失禁患者的疗效显著,有利于促进盆底肌力的恢复,且有效改善患者尿动力学参数,提高生活质量,具有较高的临床推广应用价值。     

Device to promote pelvic floor muscle training for stress incontinence

AIM: Many patients with stress urinary incontinence do not have enough motivation to continue pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) by themselves. Therefore, a device was created to support PFMT, and its effect was examined. METHODS: Forty-six women with stress urinary incontinence were assigned to a control group or a device group in order of presentation. A pamphlet on PFMT was given to control patients, while the same pamphlet plus the device and instructions on its use were given to patients in the device group. The device had a chime that was set to sound three times a day when exercise sessions were scheduled. PFMT consisted of fast and slow pelvic floor muscle contraction exercises that were performed for 2 min and followed a rhythm set by the device. RESULTS: After 8 weeks, 20 patients from the control group and 21 patients from the device group could be evaluated. In the control group, only the quality of life (QOL) index improved significantly. In the device group, however, the daily number of incontinence episodes, the number of pads used daily, the QOL index, and the pad weight in the pad test improved significantly. Patients in the device group said that they felt obligated to perform PFMT when the chime sounded. Forty-eight percent of patients from the device group were satisfied with the outcome of PFMT, while only 15% were satisfied in the control group. CONCLUSION: This device may be useful to support the management of stress urinary incontinence.     

Determining the optimal pelvic floor muscle training regimen for women with stress urinary incontinence

Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training has received Level‐A evidence rating in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women, based on meta‐analysis of numerous randomized control trials (RCTs) and is recommended in many published guidelines. However, the actual regimen of PFM training used varies widely in these RCTs. Hence, to date, the optimal PFM training regimen for achieving continence remains unknown and the following questions persist: how often should women attend PFM training sessions and how many contractions should they perform for maximal effect? Is a regimen of strengthening exercises better than a motor control strategy or functional retraining? Is it better to administer a PFM training regimen to an individual or are group sessions equally effective, or better? Which is better, PFM training by itself or in combination with biofeedback, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and/or vaginal cones? Should we use improvement or cure as the ultimate outcome to determine which regimen is the best? The questions are endless. As a starting point in our endeavour to identify optimal PFM training regimens, the aim of this study is (a) to review the present evidence in terms of the effectiveness of different PFM training regimens in women with SUI and (b) to discuss the current literature on PFM dysfunction in SUI women, including the up‐to‐date evidence on skeletal muscle training theory and other factors known to impact on women's participation in and adherence to PFM training. Neurourol. Urodynam. Neurourol. Urodynam. 30:746–753, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Hypopressive technique versus pelvic floor muscle training for postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation: A prospective cohort study

Aims: Abdominal hypopressive technique (AHT) is gaining popularity as an alternative to pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) during postpartum. Although, there is no solid evidence for its recommendation. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study in a university hospital with 105 primiparae who performed a two‐month PFMT or AHT program. The aim was to compare the effectiveness of both treatments in terms of morphofunctional changes in 3D transperineal ultrasound, manometry, dynamometry, and differences in urinary incontinence symptoms (ICIQ‐IU‐SF) and satisfaction. Results: The average change in levator ani muscle was 1.2 mm higher in AHT group vs PFMT (95% confidence interval [CI], ?2.2 to ?0.2; P = .017). No statistically significant differences were shown in maximal strength changes between groups. After AHT, basal tone change was 63.0 g/cm² higher than PFMT (95% CI, ?129 to 2.9; P = .06). A statistically significant reduction in ICIQ‐IU‐SF was observed after both treatments [(PFMT, ?0.8 points; 95% CI, ?1.4 to ?0.1; P = .015), (AHT, ?0.7 points; 95% CI, ?1.3 to ?0.1; P = .018]. AHT showed a higher median satisfaction score than PFMT (P = .004). Conclusions: This preliminary study is the first that analyses the effect of AHT vs PFMT during postpartum. The results suggest a higher improve for AHT in levator muscle thickness and satisfaction compared to PFMT. These must be considered with caution due to the limitations of the study. Further randomized clinical trials about both techniques during postpartum are required.     

Clinical assessment of pelvic floor dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: Urodynamic and neurological correlates

We present a study on the clinical assessment of pelvic floor dysfunction in 30 female patients with proven multiple sclerosis (MS). A scoring system for pelvic floor muscle testing by digital vaginal palpation is proposed. The concept of pelvic floor spasticity in MS is introduced. The relationship of our findings with the neurological findings and urodynamic data is presented. Pelvic floor spasticity correlates well with the presence of detrusor–external sphincter dyssynergia and with more severe spinal cord disease. Neurourol. Urodynam. 17:537–542, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Pelvic floor electromyography in men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a case-control study

AIMS: The objectives of this study were (1) to identify differences between men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS), compared with pain-free men, in surface electromyography/biofeedback (sEMG/BFB) readings of pelvic floor muscles and (2) to determine which pelvic floor muscle sEMG readings may have differential diagnostic and treatment selection value by accurately predicting group membership, CPPS versus normal. METHODS: Twenty-one men with CPPS and 21 healthy men without pelvic pain underwent a standardized sEMG examination by a licensed physical therapist. RESULTS: On group difference measures men with CPPS showed significantly greater sEMG instability in preliminary resting baseline. Three sEMG measures reliably categorized CPPS versus normals with CPPS showing greater preliminary resting baseline hypertonicity and instability with lowered voluntary endurance contraction amplitude. CONCLUSIONS: CPPS patients manifest pelvic floor muscle instability compared to normals. Prebaseline resting hypertonicity and instability along with endurance contraction weakness reliably predicts subject membership in the CPPS vs. normal group. Pelvic floor muscle sEMG may be a valuable screening tool to identify patients with CPPS who may benefit from therapies aimed at correcting pelvic floor muscle dysfunction.     

Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle function in a random group of adult women in Austria

Despite an increasing clinical interest in female pelvic floor function, there is a lack of data with respect to the knowledge of average adult women about the physiological role of the pelvic floor and their ability to contract pelvic floor muscles (PFM) voluntarily. It was the aim of our study to evaluate the percentage of PFM dysfunction in adult women and the impact of risk factors, such as age, body mass index (BMI), number of children delivered, and the influence of previous PFM training. A total of 343 Austrian adult women (mean age, 41.2 ± 14.6 years; range, 18–79 years), selected at random, were examined to test their ability to contract the PFM. The examination was carried out by three independent gynecologists during the course of a routine gynecological visit. The ability to contract the PFM voluntarily or involuntarily was assessed by digital intravaginal palpation with the patients in a supine position. The muscle strength was graded according to the Modified Oxford Grading Scale by Laycock. A high percentage (44.9%) of the women was not able to voluntarily perform a normal PFM contraction. In only 26.5%, an involuntary contraction of the pelvic floor was present before an increase in intra-abdominal pressure. The inability to contract the PFM did not correlate with women’s age but revealed a weak relationship with the number of childbirths and the patient’s BMI. A significant correlation was found between the Oxford Grading Scale rating and the patient’s report about previous PFM training.