Comparison of Intrinsic Versus Paced Ventricular Function

There is increasing evidence supporting the benefits of providing optimum AV delay in cardiac pacing, though controversy exists regarding its value and the benefits of intrinsic versus paced ventricular activation. This study compared various AV delays at rest in patients whose native AV delays were 200 msec. Only patients with DDD pacemakers who had intact AV conduction and normal ventricular activation were included in the study. Nine patients were studied. Methods: Ten studies were performed. Evaluation was done in AAI and DDD modes at paced heart rates of 60/min or as close as possible to the intrinsic heart rate if this was > 60/min. Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (COJ were measured. Results: When AV sequential pacing in the DDD mode with an optimum AV delay was compared to AAI pacing with a prolonged AV interval, the average optimum AV delay in the DDD mode was 157 msec and ranged from 125 to 175 msec. The average AV interval in the AAI mode was 245 msec and ranged from 212 to 300 msec. In the DDD mode, there was an overall significant improvement in CO of 11% and SV of 9%. Patients with intrinsic AV conduction times of > 220 msec showed an overall significant improvement in CO of 13% and SV of 11%. In patients with intrinsic AV conduction times of < 220 msec, an improvement in CO of 6% and SV of 4% was seen. Conclusions: (1) An optimum AV delay is an important component of hemodynamic performance; and (2) AV sequential pacing at rest with an optimum AV delay may provide better hemodynamic performance than atrial pacing with intrinsic ventricular conduction when native AV conduction is prolonged > 220 msec.     

Prediction of interatrial and interventricular electromechanical delays from P/QRS measurements: value for pacemaker timing optimization

Summary: Cardiac pacing creates spurious delays between and within the cardiac chambers. These are: 1. Left atrial (LA) transport delay (ATD) either sensed (s) or paced (p), (time from right atrial P-wave to the end of LA transport (mitral Doppler A-wave)). 2. Interventricular delay (IVD), (time from onsets of right (RV) to left ventricular (LV) contractions). 3. P-sense offset (PSO), (time from P-onset to P-detection). Thus, restoration of left heart atrioventricular (AV) synchrony can be accomplished by compensating above delays, according to a previously published equation: RAV = ATD-IVD-PSO, where RAV = right heart AV.
Objective: To test the hypothesis that ATD could be predicted from Ps and Pp, and that interventricular delay (IVD) could be predicted from QRSp, using three-lead surface electrocardiograms (ECGs).
Methods: Thirty-six patients aged 63.5 ± 15.5 years, 64% males, all with previously implanted DDD pacemakers, were studied by echo-Doppler and surface ECG obtained with a pacemaker programmer. Measurements included Ps; Pp; intrinsic QRSs; and paced QRSp, ATDs, ATDp, and IVD (difference between RVp and RVs left preejection intervals, PEI). Regressions between ECG and echo-Doppler intervals were calculated.
Results: Regressions and correlation coefficients: ATD (s+p) = 0.96*P + 55 (R = 0.94, P < 0.0001); PEIp = 0.75 * QRSp + 34.8 (R = 0.89, P< 0.0001); IVD = 0.39 *QRSp – 7.9 ms (R = 0.87, P = 0.002).
Conclusions: Inter-atrial and inter-ventricular electromechanical delays can be predicted from P-wave and QRS durations. These measurements allow AV delay optimization in DDD and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices with no need of Doppler echocardiography.     

VDD Pacing at Short Atrioventricular Intervals Does Not Improve Cardiac Output in Patients with Dilated Heart Failure

Atrial synchronous pacing with short, nonphysiologicai atrioventricular (AV) intervals has been reported to increase cardiac output in selected patients with severe dilated heart failure. The aim of this study was to determine the acute effect of atrial synchronous pacing with short AV intervals in a consecutive series of patients with dilated heart failure. Twelve patients with a mean ejection fraction of 21 %± standard error 2.5% were studied. Pacing catheters were placed in the high right atrium and right ventricular apex and a balloon flotation catheter in the pulmonary artery for measurement of cardiac output. Simultaneous transthoracic echocardiography was performed for measurement of left ventricular filling time and mitral regurgitation. In a randomized crossover design, measurements were made during VDD pacing at programmed AV intervals of 100 and 60 msec and during a control period in sinus rhythm. Left ventricular filling time increased at AV intervals of 100 and 60 msec (mean difference 37 ± 9 and 34 ± 11 msec, respectively, both P < 0.01 compared to control). Despite increases in ventricular filling time, stroke, and cardiac index declined with short atrioventricular intervals (at an AV interval of 60 msec, stroke index fell by 2.1 ± 0.5 mL/m², P < 0.05 and cardiac index by 125 ± 45 mL/m²; P = NS). Heart rate was unchanged at both AV intervals (78 ± 4.9 at control, 78 ± 5.2 at 100 msec and 79 ± 4.9 beats/min at 60 msec; P = NS). The decrease in stroke index at an AV Interval of 60 msec was inversely related to control left ventricular filling time (r = 0.74; P = 0.01) and ejection fraction (r = 0.69; P = 0.02) and directly related to heart rate (r = 0.77; P < 0.01). The change in stroke index at an AV delay of 60 msec was also inversely related to the change in mitral regurgitation induced by pacing (r = 0.84; P = 0.01). Thus, in a group of patients with stable dilated heart failure, atrial synchronous pacing with short AV intervals did not improve cardiac output. The change in cardiac output with pacing was inversely related to baseline left ventricular function and to the change in mitral regurgitation induced by pacing.     

Accelerometer-derived time intervals during various pacing modes in patients with biventricular pacemakers: comparison with normals

INTRODUCTION: Changes due to biventricular pacing have been documented by shortening of QRS duration and echocardiography. Compared to normal ventricular activation, the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) results in a significant change in cardiac cycle time intervals.Some of these have been used to quantify the underlying cardiac dyssynchrony, assess the effects of biventricular pacing, and guide programming of ventricular pacing devices. This study evaluates a simple noninvasive method using accelerometers attached to the skin to measure cardiac time intervals in biventricularly paced patients. METHODS: Ten patients with biventricular pacemakers previously implanted for congestive heart failure were paced in the AAI mode, then in atrioventricular (AV) sequential mode from the right and left ventricles followed by biventricular pacing. Simultaneous recordings were obtained by 2D, Doppler echocardiography as well as by accelerometers. Similar recordings were obtained from 10 gender, aged matched, normal controls during sinus rhythm. RESULTS: Compared to normals, heart failure patients paced in AAI mode had prolonged isovolumetric contraction time (IVCT), shorter ventricular ejection time (LVET), and prolonged isovolumetric relaxation (IVRT). With biventricular pacing the IVCT decreased, but the LVET and IVRT did not change significantly. There was excellent correlation between the echo and accelerometer-measured intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Shortening of the IVCT measured by an accelerometer is a consistent time interval change due to biventricular pacing that probably reflects more rapid acceleration of left ventricular ejection. The accelerometer may be useful to assess immediate efficacy of biventricular pacing during device implantation and optimize programmable time intervals such as AV and interventricular (VV) delays.     

Determination of the optimal atrioventricular interval in sick sinus syndrome during DDD pacing

BACKGROUND: Although the AAI pacing mode has been shown to be electromechanically superior to the DDD pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome (SSS), there is evidence suggesting that during AAI pacing the presence of natural ventricular activation pattern is not enough for hemodynamic benefit to occur. Myocardial performance index (MPI) is a simply measurable Doppler-derived index of combined systolic and diastolic myocardial performance. The aim of this study was to investigate whether AAI pacing mode is electromechanically superior to the DDD mode in patients with SSS by using Doppler-derived MPI. METHODS: Thirty-nine SSS patients with dual-chamber pacing devices were evaluated by using Doppler echocardiography in AAI mode and DDD mode. The optimal atrioventricular (AV) interval in DDD mode was determined and atrial stimulus-R interval was measured in AAI mode. The ratio of the atrial stimulus-R interval to the optimal AV interval was defined as relative AV interval (rAVI) and the ratio of MPI in AAI mode to that in DDD mode was defined as relative MPI (rMPI). RESULTS: The rMPI was significantly correlated with atrial stimulus-R interval and rAVI (r = 0.57, P = 0.0002, and r = 0.67, P < 0.0001, respectively). A cutoff point of 1.73 for rAVI provided optimum sensitivity and specificity for rMPI >1 based on the receiver operator curves. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the intrinsic AV conduction is moderately prolonged, some SSS patients with dual-chamber pacing devices benefit from the ventricular pacing with optimal AV interval. MPI is useful to determine the optimal pacing mode in acute experiment.     

Proposal of a Method for Automatic Optimization of Left Heart Atrioventricular Interval Applicable to DDD Pacemakers

Electrical pacing of the right heart is known to cause delays in the depolarization of left heart chambers, leading to abnormal left heart AV sequence. Interatrial conduction time, defined as the time from the right atrial pacing pulse or intrinsic P to the onset of left atrial P wave, and P wave sensing delay cause a shorter left heart AV interval during atrial pacing-ventricular sensing and atrial sense-ventricular pace. Interventricular conduction time (the time from the right ventricular pacing pulse to the onset of left ventricular depolarization), lengthens left heart AV interval during atrial sensing-ventricular pacing. These delays may add up or partly cancel out, depending on pacing mode. Thus, an algorithm for DDD pacemakers to optimize left heart AV interval by compensating for the above delays is proposed. This algorithm takes into account pacing and sensing delays to deliver a certain AV sequence to the right heart, aimed at producing a physiological left heart AV interval. The optimization of left heart AV interval is achieved by automatically changing right heart AV interval and pacing mode in accordance with known interatrial and interventricular conduction delays, and P wave sense offset.     

病态窦房结综合征伴房室传导延迟AAI与DDD起搏模式右心功能的超声评价

目的探讨AAI与DDD起搏模式下病态窦房结综合征伴房室传导阻滞患者的右心功能。方法 35例病态窦房结综合征伴Ⅰ度房室传导阻滞植入DDD双腔起搏器患者,先用程控仪将起搏器程控为DDD模式,最后程控为AAI模式。超声心动图检测患者2种起搏模式下的各参数变化情况。结果 DDD起搏模式下的RVPEP、RVPEP/RVET、Sm、Tei指数明显高于AAI起搏模式（P〈0.05）,E/Em低于AAI起搏模式（P〈0.05）。结论 AAI起搏模式右心的收缩和舒张功能均优于AV间期优化的DDD起搏模式。     

A New Dual-Chamber Pacing Mode to Minimize Ventricular Pacing

Despite the low long-term incidence of high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block and the known negative effects of ventricular pacing, programming of the AAI mode in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) remains exceptional. A new pacing mode was, therefore, designed to combine the advantages of AAI with the safety of DDD pacing. AAIsafeR behaves like the AAI mode in absence of AV block. First- and second-degree AV blocks are tolerated up to a predetermined, programmable limit, and conversion to DDD takes place in case of high-degree AV block. From DDD, the device may switch back to AAI, provided AV conduction has returned. The safety of AAIsafeR was examined in 43 recipients (70 ± 12-year old, 24 men) of dual chamber pacemakers implanted for SND or paroxysmal AV block. All patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings before hospital discharge and at 1 month of follow-up with the AAIsafeR mode activated. No AAIsafeR-related adverse event was observed. At 1 month, the device was functioning in AAIsafeR in 28 patients (65%), and the mean rate of ventricular pacing was 0.2%± 0.4%. Appropriate switches to DDD occurred in 15 patients (35%) for frequent, unexpected AV block. AAIsafeR mode was safe and preserved ventricular function during paroxysmal AV block, while maintaining a very low rate of ventricular pacing. The performance of this new pacing mode in the prevention of atrial fibrillation will be examined in a large, controlled study.     

Interatrial conduction correlates with optimal atrioventricular timing in cardiac resynchronization therapy devices

Background: Echocardiographic optimization of the atrioventricular delay (AV) may result in improvement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcome. Optimal AV has been shown to correlate with interatrial conduction time (IACT) during right atrial pacing. This study aimed to prospectively validate the correlation at different paced heart rates and examine it during sinus rhythm (Sinus). Methods: An electrophysiology catheter was placed in the coronary sinus (CS) during CRT implant (n = 33). IACT was measured during Sinus and atrial pacing at 5 beats per minute (bpm) and 20 bpm above the sinus rate as the interval from atrial sensing or pacing to the beginning of the left atrial activation in the CS electrogram. P‐wave duration (PWd) was measured from 12‐lead surface electrocardiogram, and the interval from the right atrial to intrinsic right ventricular activation (RA‐RV) was measured from device electrograms. Within 3 weeks after the implant patients underwent echocardiographic optimization of the sensed and paced AVs by the mitral inflow method. Results: Optimal sensed and paced AVs were 129 ± 19 ms and 175 ± 24 ms, respectively, and correlated with IACT during Sinus (R = 0.76, P < 0.0001) and atrial pacing (R = 0.75, P < 0.0001), respectively. They also moderately correlated with PWd (R = 0.60, P = 0.0003 during Sinus and R = 0.66, P < 0.0001 during atrial pacing) and RA‐RV interval (R = 0.47, P = 0.009 during Sinus and R = 0.66, P < 0.0001 during atrial pacing). The electrical intervals were prolonged by the increased atrial pacing rate. Conclusion: IACT is a critical determinant of the optimal AV for CRT programming. Heart rate‐dependent AV shortening may not be appropriate for CRT patients during atrial pacing. (PACE 2011; 34:443–449)     

Septal Short Atrioventricular Delay Pacing: Additional Hemodynamic Improvements in Heart Failure

Controversy exists as to whether short AV delay pacing is beneficial in left ventricular dysfunction with the studies performed coming to disparate conclusions. The right ventricular apical pacing previously studied results in asynchronous contraction and relaxation sequences and may limit the potential benefits of short AV delay pacing. In this study the hemodynamic effects of septal (resulting in a more physiological activation sequence) and apical right ventricular activation were compared in 15 patients with heart failure. VDD pacing with AV delays of 50,100, and 150 msec was evaluated. Apical VDD pacing did not increase the cardiac output significantly, 4.1 ± 0.75 to 4.45 ± 0.74 L/min, whereas septal VDD pacing increased the cardiac output to 4.86 ± 0.79 L/min (P = 0.037). Apical pacing increased the cardiac output in 10 patients and septal pacing in 11 patients. We conclude that selected patients with ventricular dysfunction benefit from short AV delay pacing. Septal ventricular activation confers significant hemodynamic improvements over apical activation.     

Impedance Cardiography for Atrioventricular Interval Optimization During Permanent Left Ventricular Pacing

TSE, H-F., et al. : Impedance Cardiography for Atrioventricular Interval Optimization During Permanent Left Ventricular Pacing. Left ventricular (LV) pacing is increasingly used in the management of congestive heart failure. Optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) interval is essential to maximize the hemodynamic benefits of this therapy. Although Doppler echocardiography (echo) is the most widely used method, it is time-consuming, expensive, and operator-dependent. We examined the value of an impedance cardiography (IC)-based method of cardiac output (CO) measurement to optimize the AV interval in 5 men and 1 woman (mean age   = 72 ± 11   years) during permanent LV pacing with a 4.8 Fr unipolar coronary sinus pacing lead. Simultaneous measurements of CO by IC and echo were performed at AV intervals of 50, 80, 110, 150, 180, and 225 ms during DDD pacing at 85 beats/min. The optimal AV interval varied between 110 and 180 ms. In 5 of 6 patients (83%), the optimal AV interval by echo and IC was identical. While CO measurements were higher with IC than with echo (   6.1 ± 0.4 L/min   vs 4.7 ± 0.3 L/min, P < 0.05), CO measurements by IC and echo were closely correlated   r = 0.67   , P < 0.001). In conclusion, our initial experience suggests that IC is a reliable method of AV interval optimization during LV pacing. IC and echo measurements of CO during LV pacing were closely correlated. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. II]:189–191)     

Lack of Influence of Atrioventricular Delay on Stroke Volume at Rest in Patients with Complete Atrioventricular Block and Dual Chamber Pacing

Dual chamber pacing (DDD) maintains atrioventricular (AV) sequence; AV delay programmability modifies the relationship between atrial and ventricular contraction. To evaluate the hemodynamic effects of such a modification, ten patients with a DDD unit for complete AV block were studied by time-motion (M-mode) and Doppler echocardiography during inhibited ventricular pacing (VVI), atrial-triggered ventricular pacing (VDD) and atrioventricular sequential pacing (DVI) at different AV delay (90, 140, 190, 240 msec). A significant improvement in stroke volume (SV) (15%-20%, P less than 0.05) was seen during DDD versus VVI pacing; no changes, however, were observed in the same patient with different AV delay or during DVI versus VDD pacing. These data suggest that programming of AV delay does not affect systolic performance at rest; longer diastolic filling times recorded during DDD pacing with "short" AV delay (90-140 msec) do not seem to be a hemodynamically relevant epi-phenomenon of PM programming.     

Hemodynamic Effect of Physiological Dual Chamber Pacing in a Patient with End-Stage Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report

I report a case of end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy with first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, which had been resistant to intensive medical therapy and was eventually treated by DDD pacemaker. The optimal AV interval setting was decided using invasive right-heart catheterization and Doppler echocardiography. At a pacing rate of 92/minute, an AV interval setting of between 200 and 100 msec increased left ventricular filling and enhanced myocardial contractility. An AV interval setting of 50 msec increased the left ventricular filling further. However, this resulted in deteriorated left ventricular function. Based on these findings, the pacemaker was programmed at an optimal AV delay of 100 msec, a rate of 82-150 beats/min and a DDD mode, resulting in a good clinical course for 4 months after the therapy. Thus, it is suggested that in patients with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy and first-degree AV block, an optimal AV delay setting using a DDD pacemaker can improve deteriorated myocardial function probably by increasing the left ventricular filling, and thus promote utility of the Frank-Starling mechanism.     

Contribution of Atrioventricular Synchrony to Left Ventricular Systolic Function in a Closed-Chest Canine Model of Complete Heart Block: Implications for Single-Chamber Rate-Variable Cardiac Pacing

This study assessed the impact of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony on characteristics of left ventricular (LV) systolic function during ventricular pacing over a wide heart rate range in a conscious closed-chest canine model of complete AV block. Ten healthy adult dogs underwent thoracotomy during which complete AV block was created by formaldehyde injection, and paired ultrasonic sonomicrometers were positioned on the LV anterior-posterior minor axis. Following recovery from surgery, peak and end-diastolic LV transmural pressure, maximum dP/dt, stroke work, end-diastolic minor axis dimension, and maximum velocity of shortening, were quantitated at heart rates of 80, 100, 120, 140, and 160 beats per minute (bpm) during both ventricular pacing alone and AV sequential pacing with increasing AV intervals (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 ms). Over the heart rate range tested, parameters of LV systolic function did not differ significantly during ventricular pacing with or without AV synchrony. For example, during ventricular pacing alone maximum LV dP/dt varied from 2110 +/- 70 mmHg/s to 2463 +/- 567 mmHg/s, a range essentially identical to that observed in the presence of AV synchrony. On the other hand, although the impact on LV performance of varying AV interval from 0 to 300 ms was small, differences tended to become more pronounced at higher pacing rates. At 80 bpm, neither stroke work nor maximum LV dP/dt were affected by change in AV interval, while at heart rates greater than or equal to 120 bpm both stroke work and LV dP/dt tended to maximize at AV intervals of 50 and 100 ms and thereafter declined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Relationship Between Interatrial Conduction Times and Left Atrial Dimension in Patients Undergoing Atrioventricular Stimulation

Interatrial conduction time (IACT) and left atrial dimension (LAD) were determined in 75 patients (41 males, 34 females, mean age 78.2 ± 7,9 years) undergoing atrioventricular (AV) stimulation. The LAD was measured by M mode echocardiography as the distance between the posterior aortic wall and the posterior left atrial wall. The IACT was determined during a transvenous dual chamber pacemaker implant done under local anesthesia (lidocaine). The spontaneous interatrial conduction time (SIACT) was measured from the intrinsic deflection (ID) of the right atrium recorded in a unipolar mode (unipolar J-shaped had positioned in the right appendage) to the ID of the left atrium (bipolar esophageal lead, left atrial positive deflection equal to the negative one) during sinus rhythm. The right atrium then was paced at a rate slightly greater than the spontaneous one. The paced interatrial conduction time (PIACT) was measured from the stimulus artifact to the left atrial ID. The PIACT was also measured during incremental right atrial pacing (10 beats/min step increase to 180 beats/min) and, from these measurements, the maximum increase of PIACT (MIPIACT) was deduced. The LAD was measured at 39.5 ± 8.7 mm, SIACT at 70.3 ± 24.8 msec, PIACT at 118.8 ± 27.9 msec, and MIPIACT at 16.5 ± 16.4 msec. We found highly significant relationships between SIACT and LAD(P = 0.0006, r - 0.39), PIACT and LAD (P = 0.0001, r = 0.45), and MIPIACT and LAD (P = 0.0006, r = 0.38). We also noted that the LAD was greater in patients in whom MIPIACT was >10 msec than in patients in whom the MIPIACT was negligible (P < 0.002). However, the “r” values indicate that IACT is probably determined by multiple factors, and LAD appears to be one of the most important. Thus, we demonstrated the existence of highly significant relationships between the LAD determined by M mode echocardiography and the IACT when sensing and pacing the right atrium. We also demonstrated that the LAD was greater in patients in whom PIACT increased by an appreciable duration during fast atrial pacing. These results must be kept in mind when choosing a mode of stimulation and determining the AV delay (dual chamber pacemaker), particularly in patients with left atrial enlargement in whom the contribution of the atrial contraction and its timing are hemodynamically determinant.     

Effect of the Atrioventricular Relationship on Atrial Refractoriness in Humans

Atrial arrhythmias occur frequently in the setting of increased atrial size and pressure. This may result from contraction-excitation feedback. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of alterations in atrial pressure, induced by varying the atrioventricular (AV) interval, on atrial refractoriness, and on the frequency of induction of atrial fibrillation. Twenty-seven patients without structural heart disease participated in the study. In each patient the atrial effective (ERP) and absolute refractory period (ARP) were measured during AV pacing at a cycle length of 400 msec and AV intervals of 0, 120, and 160 msec. The ERP was defined as the longest extrastimulus coupling interval that failed to capture with an extrastimulus current strength of twice the stimulation threshold. The ARP was defined in a similar manner with an extrastimulus current strength of 10 mA. The ERP and ARP were determined during continuous pacing using the incremental extrastimulus technique. A subset of patients had the pacing protocol performed during autonomic blockade. As the AV interval was increased from 0 to 160 msec, the peak right atrial pressure decreased from 16 +/- 4 mmHg to 7 +/- 3 mmHg and the mean right atrial pressure decreased from 7 +/- 3 mmHg to 3 +/- 22 mmHg (P less than 0.001). The atrial ERP and ARP did not change with alterations in the AV interval. There was no difference in the frequency of induction of atrial fibrillation. Similar results were obtained during autonomic blockade. These findings suggests that the phenomenon of contraction-excitation feedback may not be of importance in the development of atrial arrhythmias in patients without structural heart disease.     

AV Delay Optimization and Management of DDD Paced Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Ten DDD paced patients, suffering front dilated cardiomyopathy in the NYHA functional classes III or IV were studied by means of Doppler ecbocardiography at different programmed values of atrioventricular (AV) delay (200, 150, 120, 100, and 80 msec). The following variables were evaluated: LV diameter, ejection fraction, mitral and aortic flow velocity integrals, and stroke volume. During VDD pacing, a resting AV delay associated with the best diastolic filling and systolic function was identified and programmed individually. Shortening of the AV delay to about 100 msec was associated with a gradual and progressive improvement. Further decrease caused an impairment of systolic function. The patients were clinically and beinodynamically reevaluated after 2 months of follow-up. A reduction of NYHA class and an improvement of LV function were consistently found. The reported data suggest that programming of an optimal A V delay may improve myocardial function in DDD paced patients with congestive heart failure. This result may be the consequence of an optimization of left ventricular filling and a better use of the Frank-Starling law.     

Evaluation of atrial conduction time at various sites of right atrial pacing and influence on atrioventricular delay optimization by surface electrocardiography

Cardiac function and electrical stability may be improved by programming of optimal AV delay in DDD pacing. This study tested the hypothesis if the global atrial conduction time at various pacing sites can be derived from the surface ECG to achieve an optimal electromechanical timing of the left heart. Data were obtained from 60 patients following dual chamber pacemaker implantation. Right atrial septal pacing was associated with significantly shorter atrial conduction time (P < 0.0005) and P wave duration (P < 0.005), compared to standard right atrial pacing sites at the right atrial appendage or at the right free wall. The last two pacing sites showed no significant difference. In a group of 31 patients with AV block, optimal AV delay was achieved by programming a delay of 100 ms from the end of the paced P wave to peak/nadir of the paced ventricular complex. Optimization of AV delay resulted in a relative increase of echocardiographic stroke volume (SV) (10.9 +/- 13.7%; 95% CI: 5.9-15.9%) when compared to nominal AV delay (170 ms). Optimized AV delay was highly variable (range 130-250 ms; mean 180 +/- 35 ms). The hemodynamic response was characterized by a weak significant relationship between SV increase and optimized AV delay (R2 = 0.196, R = 0.443, P = 0.047). The study validated that septal pacing is advantageous for atrial synchronization compared to conventional right atrial pacing. Tailoring the AV delay with respect to the surface ECG improved systolic function significantly and was superior to nominal AV delay settings in the majority of patients.     

Differentiation of Sinus Tachycardia From Ventricular Tachycardia with 1:1 Ventriculoatrial Conduction in Dual Chamher Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Feasibility of a Criterion Based on the Atrioventricular Interval

Tachycardia discrimination in future implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is likely to be enhanced by the addition of an atrial sensing/pacing lead. However, differentiation of sinus tachycardia (ST) from ventricular tachycardia (VT) with 1:1 VA conduction will remain problematic. We assessed the use of the AV interval as a potential criterion for correctly differentiating ST from VT. Incremental V pacing at the right ventricular (HV) apex served as a “VT” model in each of 41 patients with 1:1 VA conduction to pacing cycle lengths ≤ 450 msec. High right atrial and RV apical electrograms during normal sinus rhythm (NSR) and during incremental V pacing were digitized (simulating ICD sensing). From these signals, AV interval versus pacing cycle length plots were computer generated to identify crossover cycle lengths, each defined as the cycle length at which the AV interval during V pacing equals the AV interval during NSR. At cycle lengths longer than the crossover value, the AV interval during “VT” exceeds the AV interval during NSR. In contrast, the AV interval during ST is physiologically shorter than the AV interval during NSR. Thus, ST can be readily differentiated from “VT” over a range of cycle lengths greater than the crossover value. The overall mean calculated crossover cycle length was 371 ± 52 msec. In 11 patients paced multiple times, each crossover cycle length was reproducible (mean coefficient of variation was 1.2%± 0.9% per patient). AV intervals measured at the RV apex were also analyzed with incremental V pacing during catecholamine stimulation (isoproterenol, n = 5) and during alternate site “VT” (RV outflow tract [n = 8] and left ventricle [n = 2]). In all these cases, the new “VT” plots of AV interval versus pacing cycle length coincided with or fell to the left of those obtained during control RV apical pacing and recording (i.e., these AV interval values crossed the NSR baseline at cycle lengths ≤ the crossover cycle length). Thus, the cycle length range for recognizable differentiation of ST from “VT” remained valid. The data suggest that the described AV interval criterion relying on the crossover cycle length: (1) is a promising approach to improve differentiation of ST from relatively slow VTs with 1:1 VA conduction, and (2) can readily be automated in future dual chamber ICDs, given its computational simplicity.     

Atrial Septal Pacing: A Method for Pacing Both Atria Simuhaneously

By pacing both atria simultaneously, one could reliably predict and optimize left-sided AV timing without concern for IACT. With synchronous depolarization of the atria, reentrant arrhythmias might be suppressed. We studied four male patients (73 ± 3 years) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and symptomatic bradyarrhythmias using TEE and fluoroscopy as guides; a standard active fixation screw-in lead (Medtronic model #4058) was attached to the interatrial septum and a standard tined lead was placed in the ventricle. The generators were Medtronic model 7960. The baseline ECG was compared to the paced ECG and the conduction time were measured to the high right atrium, distal coronary sinus and atrial septum in normal sinus rhytbm, atrial septal pacing, and AAT pacing. On the surface ECG, no acceleration or delay in A V conduction was noted during AAI pacing from the interatrial septum as compared with normal sinus rhythm. The mean interatrial conduction time for all 4 patients was 106 ± 2 ms; the interatrial conduction time measured during AAT pacing utilizing the atrial septal pacing lead was 97 ± 4 ms (P = NS). During atrial septal pacing, the mean conduction time to the high right atrium was 53 ± 2 ms. The mean conduction time to the lateral left atrium during atrial septal pacing, was likewise 53 ± 2 ms. We conclude that it is possible to pace both atria simultaneously from a single site using a standard active fixation lead guided by TEE and fluoroscopy. Such a pacing system allows accurate timing of the left-sided AV delay.