Low concentration Ropivacaine in labor epidural analgesia. A prospective study on obstetric and neonatal outcome]

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia effectively alleviates labor pain. However controversy exists about the effect of epidural analgesia on labor outcome. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a low concentration local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.08%) in labor epidural analgesia (LEA) on labor pain relief, on the incidence of cesarean sections and instrumental vaginal deliveries, and on neonatal outcome. METHODS: In the period April 1998 - July 2000, 323 women in active labor with live, singleton and in vertex presentation fetuses at term of gestation were included in this prospective study. Women with pre-gestational and/or obstetric diseases or previous caesarean deliveries were excluded. One-hundred and five patients requiring - by written informed consent - LEA were allocated to receive standardised protocol of a low concentration local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.08%) coadministered with opioid (sufentanil): ropivacaine group. The remaining 239 parturients who didn't require LEA were included in the control group. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar; 12 (10.4%) patients receiving LEA delivered by cesarean section, 17 (14.8%) by vacuum extractor whereas 86 (74.8%) had a spontaneous delivery. The risk of cesarean section (adjusted for age, BMI, parity, neonatal weight and gynecologist) resulted lower, even if not significantly, in the ropivacaine group (OR 0.9; 95% IC: 0.6-1.3), while a significant increased instrumental vaginal delivery rate has been reported, although little numbers reduce statistical significance. Neonatal outcome was unaffected by the use of LEA. CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion is drawn that a lower concentration of ropivacaine (0.08%) in LEA produces good labor pain relief with no detectable adverse effects on mother and neonate, and without significantly increasing cesarean section rate.     

Epidural analgesia with sufentanil during labor and operative delivery

BACKGROUND: It has been argued that by adding an opioid to the local anesthetic drug used for epidural analgesia during childbirth, one can reduce the risk of operative delivery. Objective. In a population-based observational study, to evaluate the effect of adding an opioid to a local anesthetic drug on the risk of instrumental delivery or cesarean section. DESIGN: Comparison of delivery units adding/not adding opioid to the local anesthetic for epidural analgesia in labor. SETTING: All deliveries using epidural analgesia in Sweden during 1992-96 were evaluated on the basis of information stored at the Medical Birth Registry, the National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm. METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to all delivery units (n=61), as well as to the Head of corresponding Anesthesiology Department in each hospital, requesting information regarding the period when opioids (sufentanil) were first added to the local epidural analgesic. Parturients given epidural analgesia were divided into three time-related groups: those delivered before the introduction of opioids (n=34,071), when opioids were first added (n=7,236), and since the introduction of opioids (n=44,384). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the effect of sufentanil versus no sufentanil, on the risk of operative delivery. The parturients were stratified for year of delivery, age, and parity. Main outcome measures. Instrumental delivery, cesarean section, length of stay in hospital post partum. RESULTS: A significant reduction was observed in the incidence of instrumental delivery (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.68-0.76). A similar though less pronounced effect was evident concerning the risk of cesarean section for nulliparae (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.72-0.88) but not for multiparae (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.80-1.07). Fewer women with an opioid added to the local anesthetic spent more than 4 (or more than 7) days in hospital post partum, compared with those given epidural analgesia without an opioid. CONCLUSION: When added to the local anesthetic used for epidural analgesia, as in Sweden during the last 5 years, opioids appear to reduce the incidence of instrumental delivery and cesarean section and also the post partum hospital stay.     

Mode of Delivery after Epidural Analgesia in a Cohort of Low‐Risk Nulliparas

Abstract: Background: Although epidural analgesia is widespread and very effective for alleviating labor pain, its use is still controversial, as the literature is inconsistent about the risk of adverse birth outcome after administration of epidural analgesia. The aim of this study was to explore associations between epidural analgesia and mode of delivery. Methods: Data were obtained from a prospective cohort from nine Danish labor wards and comprised 2,721 term nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor and a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation. Information about epidural analgesia, mode of delivery, and birth complications was obtained by the staff attending labor. Additional information was provided from self‐administered questionnaires in gestational week 37. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the association between epidural analgesia and birth outcomes. Results are presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR [95% CI]). Results: Of the total cohort, 21.6 percent required epidural analgesia, 8.7 percent had emergency cesarean section, and 14.9 percent had vacuum extraction. Women with epidural analgesia had a higher risk of emergency cesarean section (adjusted OR: 5.8; 95% CI: 4.1–8.1), and vacuum extraction (adjusted OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3–2.2). In a subgroup of the cohort with a very low overall risk of cesarean section, 3.4 percent had emergency cesarean section and an increased risk of emergency cesarean section was also found in this group (adjusted OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.5–8.2). Conclusions: In nulliparous women of a very low‐risk population, use of epidural analgesia for labor pain was associated with higher risks of emergency cesarean section and vacuum extraction. (BIRTH 38:4 December 2011)     

Epidural analgesia and third- or fourth-degree lacerations in nulliparas.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if epidural analgesia is associated with differences in rates of severe perineal trauma during vaginal deliveries. METHODS: We studied 1942 consecutive, low-risk, term, vaginal deliveries in nulliparas, including spontaneous and induced labors, at a single institution from December 1994 to August 1995. The rate of third- and fourth-degree lacerations was compared for women who had and did not have epidural analgesia for labor-pain relief. Statistical significance was determined using chi2. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations while controlling for possible confounding variables. RESULTS: Overall rates of third- and fourth-degree lacerations were 10.8% (n = 210) and 3.4% (n = 63), respectively. Epidural analgesia was given to 1376 (70.9%) women. Among women who had epidurals, 16.1% (221 of 1376) had severe perineal lacerations compared with 9.7% (n = 55) of the 566 women who did not have epidurals (P < .001; odds ratio [OR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3, 2.4). When controlling for birth weight, use of oxytocin, and maternal age in logistic regression analysis, epidural remained a significant predictor of severe perineal injury (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0, 2.0). Epidural use is consistently associated with increased operative vaginal deliveries and consequent episiotomies, so we constructed a logistic regression model to evaluate whether the higher rates of those procedures were responsible for the effect of epidurals on severe perineal traumas. With operative vaginal delivery and episiotomy in the model, epidural was no longer an independent predictor of perineal injury (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6, 1.3). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia is associated with an increase in the rate of severe perineal trauma because of the more frequent use of operative vaginal delivery and episiotomy.     

The effect of epidural analgesia on rates of episiotomy use and episiotomy extension in an inner-city hospital

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between epidural analgesia and episiotomy usage and episiotomy extension in parturients delivering vaginally. METHODS: A database of 20 888 women experiencing spontaneous vaginal delivery at Grady Memorial Hospital from 1990 to 1995 was examined to identify those receiving epidural analgesia. Patients who underwent epidural catheter placement and had adequate perineal anesthesia at delivery comprised the epidural group, and all others comprised the control group. Demographic characteristics and obstetric outcomes were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to test the association between epidural analgesia, rates of episiotomy and episiotomy extension. RESULTS: Of the 20888 women experiencing spontaneous vaginal deliveries 6785 (32.5%) received epidural analgesia. Women receiving epidural analgesia were more likely than those not receiving epidural analgesia to be African-American and nulliparous, and to have an occiput posterior presentation. Women receiving epidural analgesia were also more likely to receive an episiotomy (27.8% vs. 13.1%, odds ratio (OR) 2.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.38-2.75) and were less likely to experience a second-degree perineal laceration (11.6% vs. 14.4%, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.82) or a third- or fourth-degree extension (8.9% vs. 12.4%, OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97). When the results were adjusted for nulliparity, posterior presentation, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia and prolonged second stage, epidural analgesia remained independently associated with receipt of episiotomy (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.88-2.06) and reduced episiotomy extension (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.54-0.94). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia increases the rates of episiotomy use, and decreases the rate of episiotomy extension, independently of clinical factors associated with episiotomy.     

The effect of epidural analgesia on rates of episiotomy use and episiotomy extension in an inner-city hospital

Objective : To determine the relationship between epidural analgesia and episiotomy usage and episiotomy extension in parturients delivering vaginally. Methods : A database of 20 888 women experiencing spontaneous vaginal delivery at Grady Memorial Hospital from 1990 to 1995 was examined to identify those receiving epidural analgesia. Patients who underwent epidural catheter placement and had adequate perineal anesthesia at delivery comprised the epidural group, and all others comprised the control group. Demographic characteristics and obstetric outcomes were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to test the association between epidural analgesia, rates of episiotomy and episiotomy extension. Results : Of the 20 888 women experiencing spontaneous vaginal deliveries 6785 (32.5%) received epidural analgesia. Women receiving epidural analgesia were more likely than those not receiving epidural analgesia to be African-American and nulliparous, and to have an occiput posterior presentation. Women receiving epidural analgesia were also more likely to receive an episiotomy (27.8% vs. 13.1%, odds ratio (OR) 2.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.38-2.75) and were less likely to experience a second-degree perineal laceration (11.6% vs. 14.4%, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.82) or a third- or fourth-degree extension (8.9% vs. 12.4%, OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97). When the results were adjusted for nulliparity, posterior presentation, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia and prolonged second stage, epidural analgesia remained independently associated with receipt of episiotomy (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.88-2.06) and reduced episiotomy extension (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.54-0.94). Conclusion : Epidural analgesia increases the rates of episiotomy use, and decreases the rate of episiotomy extension, independently of clinical factors associated with episiotomy.     

Labor course and delivery in epidural analgesia: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish if epidural analgesia is associated with a higher incidence of operative vaginal delivery, longer duration of labor and more frequent use of oxytocin than labor without analgesia. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 207 women with no risk factors who delivered with epidural analgesia in the labor unit of Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy, during 2001. Length of the first and second stage of labor, mode of delivery, neonatal cord blood pH, neonatal Apgar score and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Epidural analgesia was performed on request in 6%: in this group (group A) there were 141 (68%) nulliparae and 66 (32%) pluriparae; mean ( +/- standard deviation) gestational age at delivery was 39.4 +/- 1.3 weeks (range: 34.1-41.5 weeks). In this group, 184 (89%) had vaginal delivery and 23 (11%) delivered by Cesarean section. Among controls (group B), 368 (89%) had a vaginal delivery and 46 (11%) delivered by Cesarean section; vacuum extraction was used in 18 deliveries (9%) in group A and in 13 deliveries (3%) in group B. The duration of the second stage of spontaneous labor in the nulliparae of group A was significantly longer than in group B. No statistically significant differences were found between mean umbilical artery pH values of groups A and B. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that epidural analgesia does not affect the rate of Cesarean delivery, while increasing the use of oxytocin augmentation, the duration of the second stage of labor and the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery.     

Does pain relief during delivery decrease the risk of postnatal depression?

BACKGROUND: To test the hypothesis that sufficient pain relief during delivery decreases the risk of postnatal depression. METHODS: As part of a prospective follow-up study of the risk factors for postnatal depression and its impact on the mother-infant interaction and child development, 185 parturients filled in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), first during the first postpartum week and again (n = 162) 4 months later. The incidence and the risk of high EPDS scores was calculated according to the mode of delivery and the mode of pain relief during vaginal delivery, also after adjusting for the length of labor. RESULTS: Mothers who received epidural/paracervical blockade during their delivery spent less time in the delivery room than mothers in the nitrous oxide/acupuncture group (p = 0.033) or mothers with no pain relief (p = 0.026) and had shorter length of labor than mothers without pain relief (p = 0.04). The adjusted risk of depressive scores at the first postnatal week was decreased in the epidural/paracervical group when compared with no analgesia group (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.72). This difference was not shown at 4 months postpartum. Elective or emergency cesarean section did not increase the risk of high EPDS scores at the first week or at 4 months postpartum. CONCLUSION: The mode of pain relief during vaginal delivery seems to be associated with the incidence of postpartum depression, especially immediately after delivery.     

罗哌卡因用于分娩镇痛对产程和分娩方式的影响

目的探讨罗哌卡因用于分娩镇痛对产妇产程和分娩方式的影响。方法采用回顾性分析的方法,选择行0.1%罗哌卡因+芬太尼(1μg/ml)硬膜外阻滞的190例健康、单胎、足月临产初产妇为镇痛组。另选择同期222例条件相似、未行任何镇痛措施的自然临产产妇为对照组。记录两组产妇产程时间、分娩方式、新生儿1分钟和5分钟Apgar评分。结果(1)产程时间比较:镇痛组第一产程、第二产程和总产程时间分别为(426±161)min、(54±27)min、(489±166)min;对照组分别为(364±167)min、(37±22)min、(409±170)min,两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。(2)分娩方式比较:镇痛组阴道器械助产率为20.0%(38/190),明显高于对照组的6.3%(14/222),两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);镇痛组剖宫产率及阴道顺产率分别为20.0%(38/190)、60.5%(115/190),对照组分别为28.4%(63/222)、65.8%(146/222),两组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)Apgar评分比较:镇痛组新生儿1分钟及5分钟Apgar评分<7分者分别为7.9%(15/190)、2.6%(5/190),对照组分别为4.5%(10/222)、0.5%(1/222),两组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论罗哌卡因用于分娩镇痛对产妇产程有延长作用及增加阴道器械助产率,但对新生儿出生结局无明显影响。     

Manejo expectante del período expulsivo frente a actitud activa en gestantes usuarias de analgesia epidural

ObjectiveTo determine the influence of epidural analgesia on the expulsion period when a policy of delayed pushing was used by analyzing its effect on type of delivery and perinatal outcomes.Material and methodsWe performed a retrospective observational study comparing a group of women without epidural analgesia (238) who were advised to commence pushing at full dilatation with a second group of women with epidural analgesia (238) who were advised to wait 1-2 hours after full dilatation before starting to push. The variables measured included length of second stage, type of delivery, Apgar scores, and arterial cord pH values.ResultsThe second stage was longer in the group with passive fetal descent (MD = 39.61; 95% CI, 33.2-46.01). However, Apgar scores (OR = 1; 95% CI, 0.44-2.27), arterial cord pH values (MD = 0.0012; 95% CI, -0.011-0.013), and rates of cesarean (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.42-1.55) and instrumental delivery (OR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.41-1.91) were similar in both groups.ConclusionsDelayed pushing was not associated with higher rates of adverse outcome, although the second stage of labor was longer.     

罗比卡因和布比卡因用于自控硬膜外分娩镇痛的临床效果对比研究

目的 :比较罗比卡因和布比卡因联合芬太尼用于自控硬膜外分娩镇痛 (PCEA)的效果及运动神经阻滞情况。方法 :将 6 0例健康、单胎、足月的初产妇随机分为两组 ,接受 0 .1%罗比卡因加 1μg/ml芬太尼 (RF组 )或 0 .0 75 %布比卡因加 1μg/ml芬太尼 (BF组 )自控硬膜外分娩镇痛。两组进行视觉模拟镇痛评分 (VAS)和下肢运动神经阻滞评分(MBS)。记录两组产程时间、分娩方式、阴道流血量及新生儿Apgar评分。结果 :两组产妇均有较可靠的镇痛效果 ,差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 ) ;RF组可下床活动者为 96 .6 7% ,而BF组为 33.33% ,两组差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;两组产程时间和分娩方式差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 ) ;两组新生儿Apgar评分差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :低浓度罗比卡因或布比卡因联合小剂量芬太尼用于PCEA均可产生可靠的镇痛效果。产程中罗比卡因极少引起运动阻滞 ,产妇有下床活动能力 ,其效果优于布比卡因     

Risk factors for forceps delivery in nulliparous patients

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for forceps delivery during first pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was carried out in a tertiary maternity ward between January 2001 and December 2003. A total of 582 nulliparous women, with full-term (>37 weeks gestation), singleton, cephalic pregnancies, who delivered by the vaginal route with or without instrumental assistance were evaluated. RESULTS: The strongest risk factors for forceps delivery were birth weight greater than 4000 g (OR: 6.5; 95% CI: 1.6, 26.9), the occiput posterior position of the fetal head (OR: 5.8; 95% CI: 2.5, 13.8), and epidural analgesia (OR: 7.7; 95% CI: 4.1, 14.7). Other significant risk factors for forceps delivery were age over 35 years (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1, 5.1), induction of labor (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.4, 3.1), first stage of labor longer than 420 min (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3,4.2), and a prolonged second stage of labor (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1, 2.4). CONCLUSION: Age over 35 years and induction of labor are risk factors for forceps delivery at admission. Epidural use, fetal head in occiput posterior position, and birth weight >4000 g are strong intrapartum risk factors for instrumental delivery in nulliparous women.     

Risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To define obstetrical risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labor and to determine perinatal outcome. STUDY DESIGN: All singleton, vertex, term deliveries with an unscarred uterus, between the years 1988 and 1999 were included. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to investigate independent risk factors associated with arrest of descent during the second stage of labor and the perinatal outcome. RESULTS: The study included 93266 deliveries, of these 1545 (1.7%) were complicated with arrest of descent during the second stage of labor. Using a multivariable analysis, the following obstetric risk factors were found to be significantly associated with arrest of descent: nulliparity (OR=7.8, 95% CI=6.9-8.7; P<0.001), birth weight >4 kg (OR=2.3, 95% CI=1.9-2.8; P<0.001), epidural analgesia (OR=1.8, 95% CI=1.6-2.0; P<0.001), hydramnios (OR=1.6, 95% CI=1.3-2.0; P<0.001), hypertensive disorders (OR=1.5, 95% CI=1.3-1.8; P<0.001), gestational diabetes A1 and A2 (OR=1.5, 95% CI=1.2-1.8; P<0.001), male gender (OR=1.4, 95% CI=1.2-1.5; P<0.001), premature rupture of membranes (PROM, OR=1.3, 95% CI=1.04-1.6; P=0.021), and induction of labor (OR=1.2, 95% CI=1.02-1.4; P=0.030). Deliveries complicated by arrest of descent resulted in cesarean section in 20.6%, vacuum extraction in 74.0%, and forceps delivery in 5.4%. Newborns delivered after arrest of descent during the second stage of labor had significantly higher rates of low Apgar scores (<7) at 1 and 5 min, as compared to the controls (12.7 vs. 2.1%, P<0.001; and 0.9 vs. 0.2%, P<0.001, respectively). Nevertheless, no significant differences were noted between the groups regarding perinatal mortality (0.38 vs. 0.44%; P=0.759). CONCLUSIONS: Major risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labor were nulliparity, fetal macrosomia, epidural analgesia, hydramnios, hypertensive disorders and gestational diabetes mellitus. These risk factors should be carefully evaluated during pregnancy in order to actively manage high-risk pregnancies.     

The influence of maternal epidural analgesia upon intrapartum fetal oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: The use of maternal epidural analgesia in labor may be associated with non-reassuring fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns. We aimed to assess changes in fetal oxygen saturation (FSpO(2)) during epidural analgesia in labor. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Twenty healthy parturients were enrolled following the inclusion criteria. Informed consent was obtained. Mode of delivery, use of oxytocin, maternal blood pressure, umbilical cord blood analysis, Apgar score, and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. Ropivacaine at a low concentration of 0.1% (1 mg/mL) co-administered with an opioid (fentanyl 2.5 microg/mL) was used. The values of fetal oxygen saturation were registered continuously 10 minutes before the administration of the analgesic drug and during the following 30 minutes after administration. Pulse oximetry was used simultaneously with cardiotocography (CTG). RESULTS: The average value for fetal oxygen saturation before the analgesic drug administration was 44.3 +/- 8.8%; during the first 10 minutes following administration it was 41.3 +/- 7.2% (p = 0.25) and during the following 20 minutes it was 43.05% +/- 6.9% (p = 0.63). There was no direct relationship between non-reassuring CTG pattern appearance and FSpO(2) <30% (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.76-1.64). No significant correlation was found between FSpO(2) values within the first 30 minutes of epidural analgesia and neonatal acidotic status (pH or=30%.     

Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: A retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001.

OBJECTIVE: To identify maternal and fetal risk factors associated with persistent occiput posterior position at delivery, and to examine the association of occiput posterior position with subsequent obstetric outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 30 839 term, cephalic, singleton births. Women with persistent occiput posterior (OP) position at delivery were compared to those with occiput anterior (OA) position. Demographics, obstetric history, and labor management were evaluated and subsequent obstetric outcomes examined. Potential confounding variables were controlled for using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall frequency of OP position was 8.3% in the study population. When compared to Caucasians, a higher rate of OP was observed among African-Americans (OR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.25-1.64) while no other racial/ethnic differences were noted. Other associated factors included nulliparity, maternal age > or =35, gestational age > or =41 weeks, and birth weight >4000 g, as well as artificial rupture of the membranes (AROM) and epidural anesthesia (p < 0.001 for all). Persistent OP was associated with increased rates of operative vaginal (OR = 4.14, 95% CI 3.57-4.81) and cesarean deliveries (OR = 13.45, 95% CI 11.94-15.15) and other peripartum complications including third or fourth degree perineal lacerations (OR = 2.38, 95% CI 2.03-2.79), and chorioamnionitis (OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.81-2.44). CONCLUSION: Epidural use, AROM, African-American ethnicity, nulliparity, and birth weight >4000 g are associated with persistent OP position at delivery, with higher rates of operative deliveries and obstetric complications. This information can be useful in counseling patients regarding risks and associated outcomes of persistent OP position.     

Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of pre-induction cervical length, parity, gestational age at induction, maternal age and body mass index (BMI) on the possibility of successful delivery in women undergoing induction of labor. METHODS: In 822 singleton pregnancies, induction of labor was carried out at 35 to 42(+6) weeks of gestation. The cervical length was measured by transvaginal sonography before induction. The effect of cervical length, parity, gestational age, maternal age and BMI on the interval between induction and vaginal delivery within 24 hours was investigated using Cox's proportional hazard model. The likelihood of vaginal delivery within 24 hours and risk for cesarean section overall and for failure to progress was investigated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Successful vaginal delivery within 24 hours of induction occurred in 530 (64.5%) of the 822 women. Cesarean sections were performed in 161 (19.6%) cases, 70 for fetal distress and 91 for failure to progress. Cox's proportional hazard model indicated that significant prediction of the induction-to-delivery interval was provided by the pre-induction cervical length (HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.88-0.90, p<0.0001), parity (HR=2.39, 95% CI 1.98-2.88, p<0.0001), gestational age (HR=1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.2, p=or<0.0001) and birth weight percentile (HR=0.995, 95% CI 0.99-0.995, p=0.001), but not by maternal age or BMI. Logistic regression analysis indicated that significant prediction of the likelihood of vaginal delivery within 24 hours was provided by pre-induction cervical length (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.84-0.88, p<0.0001), parity (OR=3.59, 95% CI 2.47-5.22, p<0.0001) and gestational age (OR=1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.32, p=or<0.0001) but not by BMI or maternal age. The risk of cesarean section overall was significantly associated with all the variables under consideration, i.e., pre-induction cervical length (OR=1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.11, p<0.0001), parity (OR=0.25, 95% CI 0.17-0.38, p<0.0001), BMI (OR=1.85, 95% CI 1.24-2.74, p=0.0024), gestational age (OR=0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.98, p=0.0215) and maternal age (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p=0.0192). The risk of cesarean section for failure to progress was also significantly associated with pre-induction cervical length (OR=1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.14, p<0.0001), parity (OR=0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.43, p<0.0001), gestational age (OR=0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.96, p=0.0097) and BMI (OR=2.07, 95% CI 1.27-3.37, p=0.0036). CONCLUSION: In women undergoing induction of labor, pre-induction cervical length, parity, gestational age at induction, maternal age and BMI have a significant effect on the interval between induction and delivery within 24 hours, likelihood of vaginal delivery within 24 hours and the risk of cesarean section.     

Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cesarean and operative vaginal deliveries are associated with an increased risk of maternal rehospitalization compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery. METHODS: A population-based cohort study was conducted by using the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database between 1997/1998 and 2000/2001, which included 900,108 women aged 15-44 years with singleton live births (after excluding several selected obstetric conditions). RESULTS: A total of 16,404 women (1.8%) were rehospitalized within 60 days after initial discharge. Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery (rate 1.5%), cesarean delivery was associated with a significantly increased risk of postpartum readmission (rate 2.7%, odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-1.9); ie, there was 1 excess postpartum readmission per 75 cesarean deliveries. Diagnoses associated with significantly increased risks of readmission after cesarean delivery (compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery) included pelvic injury/wounds (rate 0.86% versus 0.06%, OR 13.4, 95% CI 12.0-15.0), obstetric complications (rate 0.23% versus 0.08%, OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.6-3.5), venous disorders and thromboembolism (rate 0.07% versus 0.03%, OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.1-3.4), and major puerperal infection (rate 0.45% versus 0.27%, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6-1.9). Women delivered by forceps or vacuum were also at an increased risk of readmission (rates 2.2% and 1.8% versus 1.5%; OR forceps: 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.5; OR vacuum: 1.2, 95% CI 1.2-1.3, respectively). Higher readmission rates after operative vaginal delivery were due to pelvic injury/wounds, genitourinary conditions, obstetric complications, postpartum hemorrhage, and major puerperal infection. CONCLUSION: Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, and operative vaginal delivery increase the risk of maternal postpartum readmission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

Vaginal delivery parameters and urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study

OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to investigate the effect of nine delivery parameters on urinary incontinence in later life. STUDY DESIGN: Incontinence data from the EPINCONT study were linked to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Effects of birth weight, gestational age, head circumference, breech delivery, injuries in the delivery channel, functional delivery disorders, forceps delivery, vacuum delivery, and epidural anesthesia were investigated. The study covered women younger than 65 years, who had had vaginal deliveries only (n=11,397). RESULTS: Statistically significant associations were observed between any incontinence and birth weight 4000 g or greater (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2); moderate or severe incontinence and functional delivery disorders (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6); stress incontinence and high birth weight (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3) and epidural anesthesia (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.5); and urge incontinence and head circumference 38 cm or larger (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.3). CONCLUSION: The effects were too weak to explain a substantial part of the association between vaginal delivery and urinary incontinence, and statistically significant results may have incurred by chance.     

Epidural analgesia during labour: maternal, fetal and neonatal aspects

AIM: The most effective technique for eliminating labour and childbirth pain is continuous lumbar epidural analgesia. The preoccupation regarding the possible negative effects on the time taken for labour and on dystocias in general represents one of the greatest hindrances in the way of its wider use. The purpose of the present study is to monitor the effects of continuous lumbar epidural analgesia on delivery times, on the state of the fetus, on the incidence of dystocic deliveries and on neonatal outcome. METHODS: Comparative prospective study. The data relating to the deliveries of 148 nulliparas and 51 pluriparas at term, submitted to epidural analgesia at the Obstetric Clinic of the University of Parma in 1999-2000 were compared with data from 144 nulliparas in labour and 60 pluriparas without epidural analgesia, selected in random fashion out of 4251 women who delivered children in the same period. The anesthetic procedure employed consisted in an injection of 20 mg/10 ml ropivacaine and 50 mg fentanyl in the epidural space at intervals of 1-2 h. RESULTS: The duration of the dilatation period was not influenced by administration of epidural analgesia while the expulsion period was longer in the course of epidural analgesia. There were no significant differences between delivery modalities in the 2 groups either as regards vaginal operative delivery or the number of cesarean sections for dystocia. The cardiotocographic profile was similar in the 2 groups. The neonatal outcome (Apgar index at 1' and 5' and transfer to the intensive care department) did not show significant differences, confirming the absence of noteworthy side-effects even from the neonatal standpoint. CONCLUSIONS: The use of low concentrations of ropivacaine (0.2%) associated with fentanyl in the epidural space proved to be a safe and effective technique for controlling labour and delivery pain.     

Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors

BACKGROUND: Induction of labor has been associated with an increased risk of emergency cesarean delivery. Knowledge of factors that influence the risk of cesarean delivery in women with induced labor is limited. METHODS: We performed a case-control study, nested within a population-based cohort of women with induced labor at term during 1991-1996 in Uppsala County, Sweden. Cases were women delivered with emergency cesarean delivery, and controls were women vaginally delivered (n = 193, respectively). Using logistic regression, analyses were performed. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used as a measure of relative risk. RESULTS: Women with a previous cesarean delivery had high risks of cesarean delivery (adjusted OR = 10.10, 95% CI = 3.30-30.92). The risk of cesarean delivery was also increased among nulliparous (adjusted OR = 4.92, 95% CI = 2.81-8.61), short (adjusted OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.06-4.59), and obese women (adjusted OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.07-3.84). A cervix dilatation less than 1.5 cm doubled the risk of cesarean delivery (adjusted OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.09-4.66). Mother's age, epidural analgesia, oxytocin augmentation, gestational age, and birthweight were not significantly associated with risks of cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a previous cesarean delivery, nulliparous, short, and obese women with induced labor are at high risk of a cesarean delivery. When there is a need to deliver a woman with a previous cesarean section or a nulliparous woman with other risk factors for cesarean delivery, it may be prudent to consider an elective cesarean section.