Distinct genomic profiles in hereditary breast tumors identified by array-based comparative genomic hybridization

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for a significant proportion of hereditary breast cancers. Earlier studies have shown that inherited and sporadic tumors progress along different somatic genetic pathways and that global gene expression profiles distinguish between these groups. To determine whether genomic profiles similarly discriminate among BRCA1, BRCA2, and sporadic tumors, we established DNA copy number profiles using comparative genomic hybridization to BAC-clone microarrays providing <1 Mb resolution. Tumor DNA was obtained from BRCA1 (n = 14) and BRCA2 (n = 12) mutation carriers, as well as sporadic cases (n = 26). Overall, BRCA1 tumors had a higher frequency of copy number alterations than sporadic breast cancers (P = 0.00078). In particular, frequent losses on 4p, 4q, and 5q in BRCA1 tumors and frequent gains on 7p and 17q24 in BRCA2 tumors distinguish these from sporadic tumors. Distinct amplicons at 3q27.1-q27.3 were identified in BRCA1 tumors and at 17q23.3-q24.2 in BRCA2 tumors. A homozygous deletion on 5q12.1 was found in a BRCA1 tumor. Using a set of 169 BAC clones that detect significantly (P < 0.001) different frequencies of copy number changes in inherited and sporadic tumors, these could be discriminated into separate groups using hierarchical clustering. By comparing DNA copy number and RNA expression for genes in these regions, several candidate genes affected by up- or down-regulation were identified. Moreover, using support vector machines, we correctly classified BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors (P < 0.0000004 and 0.00005, respectively). Further validation may prove this tumor classifier to be useful for selecting familial breast cancer cases for further mutation screening, particularly, as these data can be obtained using archival tissue.     

Estrogen receptor status could modulate the genomic pattern in familial and sporadic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Familial breast cancer represents 5% to 10% of all breast tumors. Mutations in the two known major breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, account for a minority of familial breast cancer, whereas families without mutations in these genes (BRCAX group) account for 70% of familial breast cancer cases. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To better characterize and define the genomic differences between the three classes of familial tumors and sporadic malignancies, we have analyzed 19 BRCA1, 24 BRCA2, and 31 BRCAX samples from familial breast cancer patients and 19 sporadic breast tumors using a 1-Mb resolution bacterial artificial chromosome array-based comparative genomic hybridization. RESULTS: We found that BRCA1/2 tumors showed a higher genomic instability than BRCAX and sporadic cancers. There were common genomic alterations present in all breast cancer groups, such as gains of 1q and 16p or losses of 8ptel-p12 and 16q. We found that the presence/absence of the estrogen receptor (ER) may play a crucial role in driving tumor development through distinct genomic pathways independently of the tumor type (sporadic or familial) and mutation status (BRCA1 or BRCA2). ER(-) tumors presented higher genomic instability and different altered regions than ER+ ones. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the BRCA gene mutation status (mainly BRCA1) would contribute to the genomic profile of abnormalities by increasing or modulating the genome instability.     

Breast cancer after mantle irradiation for Hodgkin's disease: correlation of clinical, pathologic, and molecular features including loss of heterozygosity at BRCA1 and BRCA2

PURPOSE: Hodgkin's disease patients who receive mantle irradiation have an age-dependent increased risk of developing breast cancer. To determine if genetic factors predispose these patients to develop breast cancer, we evaluated breast cancer specimens for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at regions where BRCA1 and BRCA2, two breast cancer tumor suppressor genes, are located. We also evaluated whether breast cancers in patients who were previously treated with radiation have a more aggressive phenotype, and whether the clinical course differed from a sporadic group of breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All females with Hodgkin's disease who were subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer and for whom tissue blocks were available were included. Using a case-control design, case patients (previously treated with radiation therapy) were matched with sporadic control breast cancer patients for age, breast cancer stage, and date of breast cancer diagnosis. After microdissection of tumor and normal tissue from paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, DNA was extracted and samples were examined for LOH at chromosomal segments encompassing BRCA1 and BRCA2. Breast cancer specimens were also evaluated in a blinded fashion for tumor grade and immunoreactivity to estrogen and progesterone receptors, p53, her2-neu, and topoisomerase II alpha. Comparisons were made between the case and control populations using chi2 analysis, and a paired Student's t test. Survival differences were evaluated using a log-rank test. RESULTS: From January 1960 to December 1983, 917 patients were diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease. Twelve patients were subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer and tissue blocks were available on 10 cases. No statistical difference was observed between the case and control populations for LOH at BRCA1 or BRCA2. In the Hodgkin's disease group, LOH was observed in 30% of tumors at BRCA1 and 10% of tumors at BRCA2 vs. 10% and 0% of tumors in the control group at BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. Breast tumors from patients who received radiation therapy for Hodgkin's disease displayed greater nuclear pleomorphism (p < 0.02), and an increase in topoisomerase II alpha expression (p < 0.05) vs. the control population. Five of 10 patients were pregnant at the time of their Hodgkin's treatment, and those patients had a shorter time interval to the development of breast cancer compared with the patients who were not pregnant (12.4 years compared with 18.6 years). There was no significant difference in disease-free survival; however, overall survival was inferior in the population previously treated with radiation therapy for Hodgkin's disease (p = 0.01). 80% of patients with a previous Hodgkin's diagnosis died of breast cancer or treatment related effects vs. 30% in the control group. CONCLUSION: We were unable to find statistical evidence for LOH at BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancers from patients previously irradiated for Hodgkin's disease. Breast cancer diagnosed after mantle irradiation may be more biologically aggressive based on the greater nuclear pleomorphism and increase in topoisomerase II alpha staining. This did not translate into a statistical difference in breast cancer disease-free survival; however, overall survival was significantly inferior in the Hodgkin's disease patients.     

BRCA1 promoter methylation in sporadic breast tumors: relationship to gene expression profiles

BRCA1 is a tumor suppressor gene that functions in DNA repair. Basal-like tumors are a distinctive subtype of breast cancer defined by gene expression profiles. Hereditary BRCA1 breast tumors and basal-like sporadic tumors have a similar phenotype and gene expression signature, suggesting involvement of BRCA1 in the pathogenesis of sporadic basal-like cancer. This study evaluates the role of BRCA1 in sporadic breast tumorigenesis. BRCA1 protein expression and promoter methylation are compared to tumor histopathology and gene expression profiles. We find BRCA1 protein expression correlates with tumor mitotic rate, consistent with normal cell-cycle regulation of the BRCA1 gene. Methylation is found in 21% of tumors and is associated with lower BRCA1 protein, but not with specific pathologic features. Basal-like tumors, defined by hierarchical clustering of gene expression, have infrequent BRCA1 methylation and high levels of BRCA1 protein expression consistent with their high mitotic rate. Tumors with BRCA1 promoter methylation are present in all expression clusters; however, a subgroup of ER-positive high-grade tumors has a significantly greater number of BRCA1 methylated tumors. Absence of BRCA1 promoter methylation and high levels of BRCA1 expression in basal-like sporadic tumors suggest alternate explanations for the phenotypic similarities of these tumors to hereditary BRCA1 tumors.     

Reduced Fhit expression in sporadic and BRCA2-linked breast carcinomas.

Evidence for alteration of the FHIT gene in a significant fraction of breast carcinomas has been reported, in apparent concordance with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosome region 3p14.2 in breast cancer and benign proliferative breast disease. A significantly higher frequency of LOH at the FHIT locus was reported for BRCA2-/- tumors, possibly due to misrepaired double-strand breaks at this common fragile region. To determine whether such genomic alterations lead to Fhit inactivation, we have assessed the level of Fhit expression by immunohistochemical detection in sporadic tumors and cancers occurring in BRCA2 999del5 carriers. To determine whether Fhit inactivation may have prognostic significance, we have also assessed expression of breast cancer markers and clinical features in sporadic tumors relative to Fhit expression. Of 40 consecutive sporadic breast carcinomas studied for tumor markers, 50% showed reduced Fhit expression. In these sporadic cancers, loss of Fhit expression was not correlated significantly with the presence or absence of other tumor markers. In a study of 58 sporadic and 34 BRCA2 999del5 Icelandic invasive cancers, there was a significant association of LOH at 3p14.2 with reduced expression of Fhit (P = 0.001); also the lower expression of Fhit and higher LOH at 3p14.2 in BRCA2 999del5 tumors relative to sporadic cancers was significant (P = 0.002). Thus, genetic alteration at the fragile site within the FHIT gene leads to loss of Fhit protein in a significant fraction of sporadic breast cancers and a much larger fraction of familial breast cancers with an inherited BRCA2 mutation, consistent with the idea that loss of BRCA2 function affects stability of the FHIT/FRA3B locus.     

MYC overexpression and poor prognosis in sporadic breast cancer with BRCA1 deficiency

Breast cancer is a complex disease; the molecular mechanisms involved in sporadic breast carcinogenesis remain to be elucidated. The present study aimed to explore the deficiency of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1), including protein loss expression, promoter hypermethylation and gene copy deletion, its correlationship with other tumor markers expression (TP53, MYC, etc.), and clinical significance in sporadic breast cancer. BRCA1 protein expression was negative in 226 of 374 (60.4 %) cases of this study. Cases negative for BRCA1 protein were more often with pathological tumor–node–metastasis stage III, positive for lymph node metastasis and MYC overexpression than BRCA1-positive tumors. BRCA1 hypermethylation was detected in 16.4 % (31 of 189) breast cancers, which correlated with BRCA1 negative, ER negative, MYC overexpression, and triple-negative phenotype. In addition, the percentage of cells with BRCA1 gene copy deletion was significantly increased in BRCA1-methylated tumors. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that patients with BRCA1-negative expression showed a worse overall survival (OS) than those with BRCA1-positive expression, and patients with BRCA1-methylated tumors had a significantly worse disease-free survival than did patients with unmethylated tumors. Furthermore, BRCA1 hypermethylation showed an inverse association with OS in LN-positive or p53-negative subgroup patients. Importantly, uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that BRCA1 was an independent prognostic indicator of OS in sporadic breast cancer. Thus, we found MYC overexpression and poor prognosis in sporadic breast cancer with BRCA1 deficiency. The targeting of BRCA1 deficiency in combination with MYC–pathways inhibitors may provide a promising strategy for sporadic breast cancer care, the triple-negative subtype in particular.     

BRCA2 mutations and androgen receptor expression as independent predictors of outcome of male breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Germline mutations of the BRCA2 gene are involved in the development of a considerable number of male breast cancer cases. Although phenotypic differences have been observed between sporadic and BRCA-related breast carcinomas, conflicting data exist on the differences in prognosis of women with hereditary and sporadic breast cancer. The purpose of the study was to investigate the prognostic value of BRCA2 status in male breast carcinoma (MBC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We studied 43 male breast cancer patients, including 12 with BRCA2 mutations. Tumor samples were characterized immunohistochemically using antibodies to estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and androgen receptor (AR). RESULTS: BRCA2-related tumors presented at the earlier age compared with sporadic tumors (P = 0.005). Patients positive and negative for BRCA2 mutations did not differ with respect to tumor size, lymph node involvement, histological grade, and sex hormone receptor status. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly decreased in BRCA2-positive patients (67% versus 28% for BRCA2-negative versus positive patients, respectively, P = 0.017 for DFS; 86% versus 25%, P = 0.006 for OS). Shorter survival was also correlated with expression of AR in tumor tissue (74% versus 33% for patients with tumors staining negatively and positively for AR, P = 0.029 for DFS; 71% versus 57%, P = 0.05 for OS). CONCLUSIONS: The BRCA2 mutations and AR expression in tumor tissue are independent adverse factors for MBC prognosis. BRCA2-related MBC presents at the earlier age compared with non-BRCA2-related cancer, but do not differ with respect to other clinicopathological features.     

The Retinoblastoma Gene Undergoes Rearrangements in BRCA1-Deficient Basal-like Breast Cancer

Breast tumors from BRCA1 germ line mutation carriers typically exhibit features of the basal-like molecular subtype. However, the specific genes recurrently mutated as a consequence of BRCA1 dysfunction have not been fully elucidated. In this study, we used gene expression profiling to molecularly subtype 577 breast tumors, including 73 breast tumors from BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Focusing on the RB1 locus, we analyzed 33 BRCA1-mutated, 36 BRCA2-mutated, and 48 non-BRCA1/2-mutated breast tumors using a custom-designed high-density oligomicroarray covering the RB1 gene. We found a strong association between the basal-like subtype and BRCA1-mutated breast tumors and the luminal B subtype and BRCA2-mutated breast tumors. RB1 was identified as a major target for genomic disruption in tumors arising in BRCA1 mutation carriers and in sporadic tumors with BRCA1 promoter methylation but rarely in other breast cancers. Homozygous deletions, intragenic breaks, or microdeletions were found in 33% of BRCA1-mutant tumors, 36% of BRCA1 promoter-methylated basal-like tumors, 13% of non-BRCA1-deficient basal-like tumors, and 3% of BRCA2-mutated tumors. In conclusion, RB1 was frequently inactivated by gross gene disruption in BRCA1 hereditary breast cancer and BRCA1-methylated sporadic basal-like breast cancer but rarely in BRCA2 hereditary breast cancer and non-BRCA1-deficient sporadic breast cancers. Together, our findings show the existence of genetic heterogeneity within the basal-like breast cancer subtype that is based upon BRCA1 status. Cancer Res; 72(16); 4028-36. ?2012 AACR.     

Short telomeres are frequent in hereditary breast tumors and are associated with high tumor grade

Telomere shortening is a common event involved in malignant transformation. Critically short telomeres may trigger chromosomal aberrations and produce genomic instability leading to cancer development. Therefore, telomere shortening is a frequent molecular alteration in early stages of many epithelial tumors and in breast cancer correlates with stage and prognosis. A better understanding of the involvement of short telomeres in tumors may have a significant impact on patient management and the design of more specific treatments. To understand the role of telomere length (TL) in breast cancer etiology we measured the length of individual telomere signals in single cells by using quantitative telomere in situ hybridization in paraffin-embedded tissue from hereditary and sporadic breast cancers. A total of 104 tumor tissue samples from 75 familial breast tumors (BRCA1, n = 14; BRCA2, n = 13; non-BRCA1/2, n = 48) and 29 sporadic tumors were analyzed. Assessment of telomere signal intensity allowed estimation of the mean TL and related variables, such as percentage of critically short telomeres and percentage of cells with short telomeres. These data were correlated with the immunohistochemical expression of molecular breast cancer markers. Hereditary BRCA1, BRCA2, and non-BRCA1/2 tumors were characterized by shorter TL comparing to sporadic tumors. Considering all tumors, tumor grade was a strong risk factor determining the proportion of short telomeres or short telomere cells. Moreover, some histopathological features appeared to be differentially associated to hereditary or sporadic subgroups. Short telomeres correlated with ER-negative tumors in sporadic cases but not in familial cases, whereas a high level of apoptosis was associated with shorter telomeres in hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors. In addition, TL helped to define a subset of non-BRCA1/2 tumors with short telomeres associated with increased expression of antiapoptotic proteins. These findings highlight the potential interest of TL measurements as markers of aggressiveness in breast cancer.     

Differential expressions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in infantile gynecomastia

BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility genes are responsible for most of the hereditary breast cancers. No or very few sporadic breast tumors have been shown to harbor mutations in the coding sequence of BRCA1 or BRCA2. In contrast to normal breast epithelial cells, BRCA1 mRNA levels in tumors appeared to be down-regulated by methylation, while BRCA2 showed significant overexpression in sporadic breast cancers. We report herein an infantile gynecomastia in a two-year-old boy, studied by immunohistochemistry of anti-BRCA1 and anti-BRCA2 antibodies. We demonstrated that BRCA1 proteins, like BRCA2, are widely expressed in the nuclei of epithelial cells surrounding the lumen of the ducts in infantile gynecomastia. The intensive nuclear staining of both proteins in the mammary tissues means that BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins are largely expressed in infantile gynecomastia.     

Immunohistochemical expression of DNA repair proteins in familial breast cancer differentiate BRCA2-associated tumors.

PURPOSE: Morphologic and immunohistochemical studies of familial breast cancers have identified specific characteristics associated with BRCA1 mutation-associated tumors when compared with BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 tumors, but have not identified differences between BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 tumors. Because BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes participate in the DNA repair pathway, we have performed an immunohistochemical study with markers related to this pathway to establish the profile of the three groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have studied two tissue microarrays that include 103 familial and 104 sporadic breast tumors, with a panel of DNA repair markers including ATM, CHEK2, RAD51, RAD50, XRCC3, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. RESULTS: We found more frequent expression of CHEK2 in BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors than in non-BRCA1/2 and sporadic tumors. We found absence of nuclear expression and presence of cytoplasmic expression of RAD51 in BRCA2 tumors that differentiate them from other familial tumors. We validated these results with a new series of patient cases. The final study with 253 familial patient cases (74 BRCA1, 71 BRCA2, 108 non-BRCA1/2), and 288 sporadic patient cases, has allowed us to confirm our preliminary results. Because BRCA2 tumors present a specific immunohistochemical profile for RAD51 and CHEK2 markers that is different from non-BRCA1/2 tumors, we have built a multivariate model with these markers that distinguish both tumors with an estimated probability of at least 76%. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that BRCA2 tumors demonstrate more cytoplasmic and less nuclear RAD51 staining, and increased CHEK2 staining. This pattern may distinguish BRCA2 from familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors.     

p53 Inactivation is a Rare Event in Familial Breast Tumors Negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations

Germline mutations at BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes result in susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated tumors have distinct histologic and molecular phenotypes, as compared to sporadic breast tumors. Typically, a higher grade of malignancy is observed in BRCA-associated cancers. A number of studies have suggested that BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins are of importance in DNA repair and maintenance of genome integrity, bringing about molecular models of tumor pathogenesis. In particular, alterations at p53 gene have been suggested to be a necessary step in the tumorigenesis of BRCA-associated carcinomas. In fact, BRCA-associated breast cancers have higher p53 mutation frequencies than sporadic ones. At present, very little is known regarding BRCA non-associated familial tumors (termed BRCAx tumors). To our knowledge no data is available on p53 alterations in this sub-group of familial tumors. In this study p53 alteration frequencies were evaluated in 13 BRCA1, 11 BRCA2 and 55 BRCAx breast tumors. Tumor samples were analyzed for p53 gene mutations by PCR-SSCP/direct sequencing, and for p53 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Altogether, p53 alterations were detected in 54% of BRCAI tumors compared with 5% of BRCAx tumors. No p53 alteration was found in BRCA2 tumors. While loss of p53 checkpoint control is likely to be an important step in the molecular pathogenesis of BRCA1-associated cancers, our data seem to indicate a p53-independent molecular mechanism underlying BRCAx neoplastic transformation.