Population screening for coeliac disease in a low prevalence area in Italy

Objective. A screening program was proposed for the village of Carcare (population 5700), located in a region of Italy with an apparently low prevalence of coeliac disease (CD): only 1 patient diagnosed out of 2557 inhabitants. The study group comprised 1002 individuals (568?F, 434?M, age range 13–90 years) recruited from blood donors, secondary school pupils and people referred to the local outpatient facilities for routine blood chemistry. Material and methods. Total IgA, IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) (ELISA, recombinant human antigen) and IgA antiendomysium (EMA) (IFI, umbilical cord substrate) antibodies were measured in the serum of all participants. All patients with IgA deficiency were investigated for IgG tTG antibodies, and in the case of disagreement between tTG and EMA, they were typed for HLA DQ2-DQ8 haplotypes. Results. Thirteen subjects were positive and 988 negative for autoantibodies (3/988 had IgA deficiency). One serum sample was positive for tTG antibodies but negative for EMA. Ten out of 13 positive subjects consented to undergo duodenal biopsy, which invariably produced evidence of CD despite the absence of clinical signs/symptoms. A post-diagnostic clinical investigation provided evidence showing mild iron deficiency (4 subjects) and osteoporosis (2 subjects). After counselling, all subjects accepted a gluten-free diet. Conclusions. The prevalence of CD in the study group was 1:100 (1.0%; 95% CI: 0.5–1.8%): this indicates that CD is largely underdiagnosed in Carcare. Our results suggest that the low prevalence of CD observed in some regions is likely to be due to underdiagnosis.     

The frequency of the celiac disease among children with familial Mediterranean fever

We aimed to assess the frequency of celiac disease (CD) in patients with Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF). This prospective study was carried out from October 2015 to March 2016 and included 303 patients with FMF. We used 98 sex- and age-matched healthy subjects as a control group. Levels of total IgA and tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA antibody were measured in all groups. Those with increased level of tTG IgA were tested for anti-endomysium IgA antibodies (EMA). Patients with positive EMA underwent gastro-duodenoscopy and intestinal biopsy for a definite diagnosis of CD. Only 9 of 303 patients (2.9%) were positive for tTG IgA. Patients positive for tTG IgA were then tested for EMA and only one of them (0.3%) had a positive result. This patient underwent gastro-duodenoscopy. The pathological report was compatible with Marsh 0 classification score for the diagnosis of CD. Two subjects from the control group were positive for tTG IgA but none of them had positive EMA antibodies. We did not find CD in the large cohort of childhood FMF patients. The prevalence of CD did not show association with presence of childhood FMF in this study and CD would not be a considerable complication of childhood FMF.     

An algorithm for family screening for coeliac disease

INTRODUCTION Coeliac disease (CD) is a disorder in which geneticallypredisposed individuals develop a small intestinal enteropathy on exposure to dietary gluten. The small bowel abnormalities are reversed on withdrawal of gluten from the diet. Recent popu…     

Elevation of IgG antibodies against tissue transglutaminase as a diagnostic tool for coeliac disease in selective IgA deficiency

BACKGROUND: IgA serum autoantibodies against tissue transglutaminase (tTG) have an established diagnostic value in coeliac disease, and high efficacy tests are widely available for their detection. However, serological evaluation of IgA deficient subjects is still difficult. AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of IgG class anti-tTG autoantibodies measured quantitatively using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) compared with immunofluorescent detection of coeliac autoantibodies. PATIENTS: We tested serum samples from 325 IgA deficient subjects, including 78 patients with coeliac disease, 73 disease controls, and 174 blood donors. METHODS: IgG antibodies against human recombinant tTG were measured with an ELISA. IgG antiendomysium antibodies (EMA) were assayed by indirect immunofluorescence on human jejunum and appendix sections. RESULTS: The IgG anti-tTG ELISA had a sensitivity of 98.7% and a specificity of 98.6%, and the correlation with IgG EMA titres was high (r(s)=0.91). One coeliac patient, initially negative in all autoantibody tests, displayed both IgG anti-tTG antibodies and IgG EMA during later gluten exposure. IgG anti-tTG antibodies and EMA titres showed significant decreases (p<0.001) in treated patients. The frequency of IgG anti-tTG autoantibody positivity was 9.8% among IgA deficient blood donors and 11 of the 12 positive subjects with known HLA-DQ haplotypes carried DQ2 or DQ8 alleles. CONCLUSIONS: IgG anti-tTG and IgG EMA autoantibody tests are highly efficient in detecting coeliac disease in IgA deficient patients. The high prevalence of coeliac antibodies among symptom free IgA deficient blood donors who also carry coeliac-type HLA-DQ genes indicates that all IgA deficient persons should be evaluated for coeliac disease.     

Coeliac disease in Iraqi type 1 diabetic patients

Background and study aimsHigh prevalence rates of coeliac disease (CD) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) have been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of silent CD in a sample of Iraqi patients with T1DM.Patients and methodsThis is a cross-sectional study done in Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Baghdad Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq, on 62 patients with T1DM. For all patients, immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgA tTG), IgG anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgG tTG), IgA endomysial antibody (IgA EMA), IgA antigliadin antibodies (IgA AGA) and IgG antigliadin antibodies (IgG AGA) tests were done, with duodenoscopy, and at least four biopsies were taken from the second part of the duodenum.ResultsA total of 27 patients (43.5%) had normal small-intestinal histopathology (Marsh 0), one of them had a positive result for all serological markers used in the study, and another patient was positive for IgA tTG only. Ten patients (16.1%) had Marsh grade I, one of them was positive for IgA tTG, IgG tTG and IgA EMA, another patient was IgA deficient and had positive IgG tTG only and another patient with Marsh I had positive IgA tTG and IgG tTG only. Two patients (3.2%) had Marsh IIIA; three patients (4.8%) had Marsh IIIB histopathology, two of them were positive for all tests and one had positive IgA tTG and IgA EMA only. Two patients (3.2%) had Marsh IIIC histopathological features; they were positive for all serological tests, hence, the frequency of CD was 11.2%.ConclusionThe frequency of silent CD in Iraqi patients with T1DM is not rare, reaching up to 11.2%. Both EMA and tTG antibodies are useful as screening tests.     

Antibody testing in Indian children with celiac disease.

BACKGROUND: We prospectively evaluated the usefulness of IgA tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgA tTG) in the initial diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) and compared its diagnostic potential with that of IgA anti-endomysial antibodies (IgA EMA) and anti-IgA and IgG gliadin antibodies (AGA and AGG, respectively). METHODS: Sera of 23 untreated children fulfilling the revised ESPGHAN criteria for diagnosis of CD (Group I; mean age 10.8 y); 19 disease controls (Group II; mean age 8.5 y) presenting with chronic diarrhea, short stature or both; and 22 healthy children (Group III; mean age 8.8 y) were studied. These were tested in a blinded manner for AGA, AGG, IgA tTG (guinea pig as antigen) and IgA EMA. RESULTS: In Group I, IgA EMA was positive in 19, IgA tTG in 17, AGA in 14 and AGG in 17 patients. In Group II, these tests were positive in 1, 0, 2 and 14 patients, respectively and in Group III, in 0, 0, 0 and 1 child, respectively. Analyzing data from Group I and II, IgA EMA, IgA tTG, AGA and AGG had sensitivity rates of 83%, 74%, 61% and 74%, respectively; the specificity rates were 95%, 100%, 89% and 26%; positive predictive values were 95%, 100%, 88% and 55% and negative predictive values were 82%, 74%, 65% and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSION: IgA tTG is useful for the diagnosis of CD, with sensitivity and specificity rates comparable to those of EMA and this test is well suited for use in tropical countries like India.     

IgA and IgG tissue transglutaminase antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and coeliac disease (CD) are diseases of an autoimmune origin that share the human leukocyte HLA-B8 and HLA-DR3 histocompatibility antigens, yet the co-association of CD with SLE is mainly based on case reports. Thus, the real prevalence of CD in SLE is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of antitissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) in SLE and the relation between SLE and CD. In this case-control study, 100 patients with SLE, and 120 healthy subjects were studied. Sera from all participants were analysed for the presence of IgA and IgG anti-tTG antibodies using a human recombinant tissue transglutaminase (tTG) immuno-enzymatic assay. Anti-tTG positive patients and controls were further tested for antiendomysial (EMA) antibodies by an indirect immunofluorescence and HLA typing (DQalpha1*0501-DQbeta1*0201 allele determination). Subjects who had EMA or the mentioned allele, underwent duodenal biopsy to confirm a possible diagnosis of CD. Anti-tTG antibodies (IgA or IgG isotypes) were found in three of the 100 SLE patients (overall prevalence of 3%): one had the IgA and two the IgG isotypes. Only 1 of 120 healthy subjects (0.8%) had a low positive reaction for IgA anti-tTG. Only the IgA anti-tTG positive SLE patient was diagnosed as having CD based on a positive IgA-EMA and small bowel biopsy findings. The two IgG anti-tTG positive SLE patients and the IgA anti-tTG positive healthy subject were classified as false positives (EMA negative and HLA DQalpha1*0501-DQbeta1*0201 allele negative). In conclusion, anti-tTG antibodies were found at a low rate in SLE patients and mostly did not indicate the presence of CD. Thus, serological screening for CD is not recommended in SLE, unless a clinical suspicion of CD is present.     

Antibodies Against Human Tissue Transglutaminase and Endomysium in Diagnosing and Monitoring Coeliac Disease

Background: Coeliac disease (CD) patients often present a variety of uncharacteristic symptoms and therefore sensitive and specific screening tests are needed as an aid in making an accurate diagnosis. A recently developed ELISA, using human recombinant tissue transglutaminase (tTG) as antigen, was evaluated for its significance in the diagnosis of CD. The patient's compliance to a gluten-free diet and the serological reaction during gluten challenge were also monitored. The results were compared with IgA-endomysium antibody (EMA) results. Methods: Sera previously collected from 365 patients (0.4-76 years) with jejunal biopsy on a gluten-containing diet and from 41 patients on a gluten-free diet or challenge were tested for IgA anti-human tTG antibodies (IgA tTG ab) with Celikey ® (Pharmacia Diagnostics). The study population comprised 208 CD patients and 157 controls. The diagnostic performance and cut-off for the assay were estimated with ROC analysis. EMA was analysed by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on cryostat sections of monkey oesophagus. Results: 200/208 patients with CD had positive IgA tTG ab (median >100 U/ml), while only 1/157 of the control patients were positive (median 1.67 U/ml). The area under the ROC curve was 98.3% and the sensitivity and specificity of the test were 96% and 99% for the study population. Only 4/365 patients (1%) presented discordant IgA tTG ab and EMA results, 2 of them had only IgA tTG ab and 2 only EMA. The IgA tTG ab levels and the EMA titres were closely correlated to the duration of gluten-free diet and gluten challenge, respectively. Conclusion: IgA tTG ab can be used as an accurate observer-independent alternative to EMA in diagnosing or monitoring CD.     

Antibodies against human tissue transglutaminase and endomysium in diagnosing and monitoring coeliac disease

BACKGROUND: Coeliac disease (CD) patients often present a variety of uncharacteristic symptoms and therefore sensitive and specific screening tests are needed as an aid in making an accurate diagnosis. A recently developed ELISA, using human recombinant tissue transglutaminase (tTG) as antigen, was evaluated for its significance in the diagnosis of CD. The patient's compliance to a gluten-free diet and the serological reaction during gluten challenge were also monitored. The results were compared with IgA-endomysium antibody (EMA) results. METHODS: Sera previously collected from 365 patients (0.4-76 years) with jejunal biopsy on a gluten-containing diet and from 41 patients on a gluten-free diet or challenge were tested for IgA anti-human tTG antibodies (IgA tTG ab) with Celikey (Pharmacia Diagnostics). The study population comprised 208 CD patients and 157 controls. The diagnostic performance and cut-off for the assay were estimated with ROC analysis. EMA was analysed by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on cryostat sections of monkey oesophagus. RESULTS: 200/208 patients with CD had positive IgA tTG ab (median >100 U/ml), while only 1/157 of the control patients were positive (median 1.67 U/ml). The area under the ROC curve was 98.3% and the sensitivity and specificity of the test were 96% and 99% for the study population. Only 4/365 patients (1%) presented discordant IgA tTG ab and EMA results, 2 of them had only IgA tTG ab and 2 only EMA. The IgA tTG ab levels and the EMA titres were closely correlated to the duration of gluten-free diet and gluten challenge, respectively. CONCLUSION: IgA tTG ab can be used as an accurate observer-independent alternative to EMA in diagnosing or monitoring CD.     

Identification of a new coeliac disease subgroup: antiendomysial and anti-transglutaminase antibodies of IgG class in the absence of selective IgA deficiency

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to increase the sensitivity of the antiendomysial antibody (EMA) test by evaluating also EMAs of IgG1 isotype. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Over the last 2 years, serum EMAs IgA and IgG1 were determined in 1399 patients, referred to our gastrointestinal unit due to clinical suspicion of malabsorption. Serum anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies IgA and IgG, as well as total IgA levels, were also investigated. Furthermore, EMAs IgA and IgG1 were evaluated in biopsy culture supernatants. Biopsy specimens were also admitted to histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. Twenty-six patients with gastroenterological disease other than coeliac disease (CD) were used as a disease control group. Ninety-nine blood donors were used as a healthy control group. RESULTS: Diagnosis of CD was based on histological findings in the 110/1399 patients showing EMA IgA positivity, and in a further 56/1399 patients presenting both EMA IgA and IgG1 positivity in sera as well as in culture supernatants. Of the remaining 1233 EMA IgA-negative patients, 60 showed only EMA IgG1 positivity both in sera and in culture supernatants. It is noteworthy that anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies IgG (anti-tTG) were positive in all 60 EMA IgG1-positive patients as well. By contrast, a selective IgA deficiency was found in only 11 out of the 60 EMA IgG1-positive patients. Villous height/crypt depth ratio was < 3:1 in 38 of the 60 EMA IgG1-positive patients (63.3%), whilst overexpression of ICAM-1 and CD25 was observed in all these patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed a group of CD patients who were EMA IgG1-positive even in the absence of EMA IgA positivity and IgA deficiency. The diagnosis was based on the finding of the gluten-dependent clinical and histological features typical of CD. Data emerging from the present investigation thus suggest that the prevalence of CD should be reassessed and that the determination of EMA IgG1 could offer a new tool in the diagnostic armamentarium of CD.     

Screening for celiac disease in Down＇s syndrome patients revealed cases of subtotal villous atrophy without typical for celiac disease HLA-DQ and tissue transglutaminase antibodies

AIM: To investigate the prevalence of celiac disease (CD) as well as CD marker antibodies and susceptibility HLA-DQ haplotypes in 134 karyotyped Down's syndrome (DS) patients. METHODS: Immunoglobulin A (IgA) and G (IgG) type anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA), IgA type anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies (anti-tTG) with antigen of guinea pig and human source were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and endomysium antibodies (EMA) by indirect immunofluoresence test. HLA-DQA1*0501/DQB1*0201 (DQ2) was revealed by polymerase chain reaction. Celiac disease was diagnosed by revised ESPGHAN criteria. RESULTS: 41% of DS patients had AGA, 6.0% IgA anti-tTG with guinea pig antigen, and 3.0 % IgA EMA (all positive for anti-tTG with human tTG). Subtotal villous atrophy was found in 5 out of 9 DS patients who had agreed to small bowel biopsy. One of them had DQA1*0501/DQB1*0201 and anti-tTG and EMA i.e. typical for CD markers (this case also fulfilled the ESPGHAN diagnostic criteria), but other four lacked these markers. Three non-biopsied DS patients had also most probably CD because DQA1*0501/DQB1*0201 and IgA anti-tTG (EMA) were detected. Thus, the prevalence of CD among our DS patients population is 3.0 % (95 % of confidence interval [CI]: 0.1-5.9 %). CONCLUSION: We confirm the increased frequency of CD among DS patients. In addition, we have revealed a subgroup of patients with subtotal villous atrophy but without characteristic for CD immunological and genetic markers. Whether these cases represent CD (with atypical immunopathogenesis) or some other immune enteropathy, requires further investigations.     

IgA and IgG Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody Prevalence and Clinical Significance in Connective Tissue Diseases, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

An association between celiac disease (CD) and other autoimmune diseases such as connective tissue diseases (CTD), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) has been reported in several studies. However, a high rate of false positives in autoantibody testing was noted, especially when tissue transglutaminase (tTG) from guinea pig liver was used. Thus, the real prevalence of CD in CTD, IBD, and PBC is unclear. In a case-control study, 400 patients with CTD, 170 with IBD, 48 with PBC, and 120 healthy subjects were investigated for CD by the analysis of IgA and IgG tTG antibodies using the more specific human recombinant tTG immunoenzymatic assay. Patients and controls with positive findings were further tested for antiendomysial antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and HLA typing, and those found positive by either of these tests underwent duodenal biopsy to confirm a possible diagnosis of CD. Twelve patients were positive for IgA or IgG tTG antibodies, showing an overall prevalence of 1.9%. Only 1 healthy subject (0.8%) had a low level positive reaction for IgA anti-tTG. Among the 12 patients and the healthy subject, only 2 (1 SLE and 1 ulcerative colitis patient) were subsequently confirmed to be affected with CD by positive EMA, HLA, and small bowel biopsy findings. The highest rate of false positives was found in PBC patients (10.4%). For these reasons, serological screening testing for CD is not recommended in CTD patients or in subjects affected with IBD or PBC, unless there is a relevant clinical suspicion of CD.     

Clinical utility of quantitative multi-antibody Polycheck immunoassays in the diagnosis of coeliac disease

AIM:To evaluate the clinical utility of multi-antibody strategies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease(CD),the new quantitative Polycheck immunoassays were analysed.METHODS:Polycheck Celiac Panels(PCPs)are immunoenzyme screening assays for the quantitative measurement of coeliac-specific immunoglobulin class G(Ig G)or class A(Ig A)in serum.Lines of relevant antigens are coated together with five Ig G or Ig A standard lines used for the standard curve as positive control.PCP IgA consists of human recombinant human tissue transglutaminase(t TG)and deamidated gliadin peptides(DGP)as targets to detect Ig A antibodies.PCP IgG consists of t TG,DGP and IF(intrinsic factor)antigens to detect antibodies in Ig G class.PCPs were performed on 50 CD patients,including 6 cases with selective Ig A deficiency,and 50 non-coeliac controls.CD diagnosis was performed according to the ESPGHAN recommendations:The presence of specific anti-t TG-Ig A or anti-DGP-Ig G(in the case of Ig A deficiency)antibodies,typical histopathological changes in duodenal mucosa described in Marsh-Oberhüber classification as at least grade 2.The diagnosis of the majority of the control subjects was functional gastrointestinal disorders.The PCP results were compared with reference EliA Celikey.RESULTS:The usage of PCPs led to the correct identification of all CD patients.In our study,PCPs showed 100%agreement with the histopathological results.PCP IgA test showed a 98%concordance and correlated positively(R=0.651,P=0.0014)with Eli A Celikey test.The highest specificity and positive predictive value(both 100%)were observed for the detection of Polycheck anti-t TG-Ig A antibodies.The highest sensitivity and negative predictive value(both 100%)were achieved by Polycheck anti-DGPIg G antibody detection.The best performance(98%sensitivity and negative predictive value,100%specificity and positive predictive value,diagnostic accuracy-AU ROC 99%)was observed for the strategy of using both PCP IgA and IgG and determining positive outcomes of the test with two or more coeliac-specific antibodies detected.The majority of coeliac patients had multiple antibodies.All four antibodies were detected in 7(14%)cases,19 children(38%)were positive for three antibodies and 23(46%)were positive for two antibodies.CONCLUSION:The present study showed that detection of coeliac-specific antibodies with multi-antibody PCPs is effective and efficacious in the diagnosis of CD.     

Tissue transglutaminase antibodies in patients with end-stage heart failure

OBJECTIVE: For celiac disease (CD), screening a trend has recently emerged to measure tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTGA) by immunoassays instead of the more laborious endomysial antibodies (EmA), as they recognize the same target, tissue transglutaminase (tTG). However, a high rate of false-positive results has been reported in some patient series with diseases known to be associated with CD. Moreover, tTG is a ubiquitous, multifunctional enzyme, overexpressed in experimental models of heart failure. Therefore, we assessed the specificity of tTGA assays in a large series of EmA-negative patients with end-stage heart failure. METHODS: We studied 288 patients with end-stage heart failure and 60 blood donors. No subject had clinical evidence of CD or IgA deficiency, and all were EmA negative. Serum IgA and IgG tTGA were measured by means of commercial kits using as substrate, either guinea pig or recombinant human tTG. Blocking studies and Western blots were also performed using recombinant human tTG. RESULTS: All blood donor sera were IgA tTGA negative. IgA tTGA positivity was observed in 47.6% and 49.1% of patients with heart failure using, respectively, guinea pig tTG and recombinant human tTG as substrates. Preincubation of positive sera with recombinant human tTG resulted in 81% blocking of IgA tTGA in immunoassay. Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of antibodies against recombinant human tTG. IgA tTGA-positive sera were also IgG tTGA positive. CONCLUSIONS: IgA and IgG tTGA occur in a large number of EmA-negative patients with end-stage heart failure, and their presence is unlikely to be caused by concomitant CD.     

Screening of the adult population in Iran for coeliac disease: comparison of the tissue-transglutaminase antibody and anti-endomysial antibody tests

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Population-based studies for the prevalence of coeliac disease (CD) in west-Asian countries are scarce. We aimed to determine the prevalence of gluten-sensitive enteropathy (GSE) in the general population of northern and southern Iran, and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the anti-endomysial antibody (EMA) immunofluorescent test and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based test for determination of the IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody (tTG-Ab) using the human recombinant transglutaminase antigen for the detection of CD in screening the asymptomatic adult population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using a stratified random sampling method we enrolled a total of 2799 individuals (1438 from Sari and 1361 from Kerman). The mean age was 33.7 years (range 18-66), with 1398 men. IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and IgA anti-EMA were determined in the serum of all subjects. Those participants with a positive serology for any of the two tests underwent small intestinal biopsy, and were classified according to revised Marsh criteria histologically. A diagnosis of GSE was based on positive serology and a compatible histopathological finding. The maximum likelihood latent class model was used to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the two tests. RESULTS: Twenty-nine cases showed positive IgA tTG-Ab (15 men and 14 women, mean age 35.4 years, range 18-59), whereas only five were simultaneously positive for EMA. Except for two subjects with normal small bowel histology (Marsh 0), all other subjects were found to have biopsy findings compatible with GSE: 18 Marsh I, five Marsh II, three Marsh IIIa and one Marsh IIIc lesions. he prevalence of GSE was 0.96% or 1:104. The sensitivity and specificity of the human-recombinant IgA tTG-Ab assay were 100 and 99%, respectively, whereas the results for IgA EMA were 19 and 100%, respectively. The IgA EMA was positive in cases with advanced mucosal lesions of the small bowel. The mean serum value of IgA tTG-Ab was higher in patients with severe enteropathy compared with those showing slight mucosal changes (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The minimum prevalence of gluten sensitivity among the general population of northern and southern Iran is 1:104. The best screening test for the detection of GSE in the general population is IgA tTG-Ab.     

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies in inflammatory and degenerative arthropathies

Recent studies identified tissue transglutaminase (tTG) as the antigen eliciting antiendomysial antibodies (EMA) in celiac disease (CD). Anti-tTG antibodies have therefore been proposed as a serological test for CD. Nevertheless, IgA anti-tTG but not EMA have also been found in inflammatory bowel disease patients, suggesting that these antibodies are linked to a tissue lesion rather than to an auto-immune component of CD. To confirm this hypothesis, we evaluated the presence of IgA anti-tTG in patients with inflammatory and degenerative diseases, in whom tissue lesions presented far away from the intestinal mucosa. The study was carried out on the serum and synovial fluid (SF) of 68 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA=33), psoriatic arthritis (PsA=26) and osteoarthritis (OA=9). In RA, PsA and OA sera, IgA anti-tTG were positive in 33%, 42% and 11% of patients, respectively. Serum anti-tTG levels were significantly higher in RA (p<0.0001), PsA (p<0.0001) and OA (p<0.02) with respect to healthy controls. SF anti-tTG levels were significantly higher in PsA (p<0.018) than in OA. A good correlation between serum and synovial fluid anti-tTG levels was found in all arthropathies This study suggests that tTG is not the only antigen of EMA and, furthermore, that IgA anti-tTG antibodies represent a general lesion-associated event. Moreover, the significant correlation between serum and synovial fluid anti-tTG levels allow us to hypothesise that these antibodies could be synthesized in the site of arthritic lesions.     

Comparison of a tissue transglutaminase ELISA with the endomysium antibody test in the diagnosis of gluten-sensitive enteropathy

BACKGROUND: Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) has recently been found to be the major if not the only autoantigen of gluten-sensitive enteropathy (GSE). OBJECTIVES: To further determine the significance of this finding for diagnostic (screening) and follow-up purposes, we performed tTG-based ELISAs, and compared the results to the endomysium antibody test (EMA). PATIENTS: We examined 120 serum samples from patients with celiac disease (CD) including 72 on a gluten-free diet (GFD) and eleven on a gluten challenge, 47 with dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) including 16 on a GFD and one on a gluten challenge, 96 with non-CD gastrointestinal diseases, and 117 with others; i.e. 380 serum samples altogether. Follow-up sera from 13 patients were included. METHODS: Results of an ELISA with guinea pig liver tTG were compared with the EMA test using monkey esophagus. Inhibition of endomysial staining was performed with sera positive on the EMA test but negative with the guinea pig tTG ELISA. RESULTS: The specificity and sensitivity of the tTG ELISA are high (98.6% and 92.5%). The serum IgA antibody titers against tTG decrease after introduction of a GFD. In one case, endomysial staining could not be inhibited. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the guinea pig tTG ELISA is suitable for use as a simple diagnostic screening and follow-up method for GSE. Further studies are necessary to identify possible additional minor antigens in GSE.     

Screening of Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody in Healthy Blood Donors for Celiac Disease Screening in the Turkish Population

Celiac disease (CD) is a disease having the characteristic pathology of the mucosa of the small intestine. The prevalence of CD in the Turkish population has not been investigated previously. The present study was designed to determine the prevalence of CD in healthy blood donors. Serum samples of 2000 healthy blood donors presenting to Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Hospital Blood Bank were tested for tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA and IgG antibodies with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Euroimmune, Germany). The histopathological findings for the cases with positive serology were evaluated. The distribution of sex was 95.7% male, and 4.3% female. The mean age was 33 +/- 9. Among 2000 donors, 23 (1.15%) were positive for tTG IgA antibody and 3 (0.15%) were positive for tTG IgG antibody. None of the samples was positive for both antibodies. Serum total IgA was measured in two cases with only tTG IgG positivity and was found to be low in one case. Twelve subjects positive for tTG agreed to endoscopy and biopsy. Histopathological examination revealed changes classified as Marsh III-II in one, Marsh II in two, Marsh I in seven, and Marsh 0 in two donors. This was the first study conducted to determine the prevalence of tTG positivity in the Turkish population. The tTG antibody positivity prevalence in healthy blood donors was as high as 1.3%. This study shows that the prevalence of CD in the Turkish population is relatively high in comparison to that in the Western world.     

Autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase are sensitive serological parameters for detecting silent coeliac disease in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To investigate the clinical significance of the determination of IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) for the detection of silent coeliac disease in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A total of 520 patients with diabetes (median age 14.2 years, range 1-27) were tested for IgA antibodies to tTG (IgA anti-tTG, ELISA), endomysium (EmA, indirect immunofluoresence) and gliadin (IgA-AGA, enzyme immunometric assay) after ruling out IgA deficiency. RESULTS: The prevalence of IgA anti-tTG among patients with diabetes was 4.4% (23 of 520), and that of EmA and IgA-AGA 3.5% (18 of 520, respectively). The coefficient of agreement between IgA anti-tTG and EmA was high (Cohen's kappa = 0.87, P < 0.001). Thirteen of the 23 IgA anti-tTG-positive patients underwent duodenal biopsy. Coeliac disease was confirmed in nine of 13 patients. One of them was negative for EmA and AGA, but positive for IgA anti-tTG. Retrospective annual determinations up to 8 years in six IgA anti-tTG-positive patients showed both permanent and transient elevations of the serological markers. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that a positive IgA antibody test to tTG is a more sensitive parameter than EmA for silent coeliac disease in patients with diabetes. Confirmatory small bowel biopsy, however, remains necessary for diagnosis as some patients with positive antibodies may be without histological changes.     

Anti-transglutaminase IgA ELISA: clinical potential and drawbacks in celiac disease diagnosis

BACKGROUND: Since the identification of tissue transglutaminase (tTG) as the antigen for the anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA), several antigen-specific immunoassays have been reported for celiac disease (CD) screening. A first objective was to evaluate the suitability for CD screening of three different IgA tTG ELISAs, two of them based on guinea pig liver tTG (gp-tTG) (an in-house ELISA with a partially purified extract and a commercial ELISA with purified gp-tTG antigen) and a third recombinant human tTG (rh-tTG) ELISA. The results are compared with EMA and with the final clinical diagnosis. A second objective was to analyze antibody reactivities in those patients with anti-tTG and EMA discrepancies. METHODS: ELISA and EMA tests were used to measure IgA anti-tTG levels in sera from 259 patients (107 had CD and 72 had Type I diabetes mellitus). RESULTS: The purified gp-tTG ELISA was highly sensitive (97.7%) and specific (98.8%) in the detection of CD, almost equaling EMA. Rh-tTG ELISA did not improved the sensitivity of EMA, but its specificity was slightly superior. Immunoblot analysis with partially purified gp-tTG extract, the antigen most frequently used for anti-tTG detection, showed that the majority of false positives were due to IgA reactivities to contaminant proteins present in the liver antigenic extract. This low specificity was particularly problematic in diabetics. CONCLUSION: Purified tTG ELISAs, either with purified guinea pig liver or recombinant human antigens, can be used as quantitative and observer-independent alternatives to the traditional and time-consuming EMA in the screening of CD.