A multistep model for ovarian tumorigenesis: the value of mutation analysis in the KRAS and BRAF genes

Epithelial ovarian tumours represent a complex group of histological subtypes and there has long been controversy over the question of a precursor lesion for these neoplasms. The application of mutation analysis of the KRAS and BRAF genes (members of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK-MAP kinase pathway) is consistent with the model for progression of mucinous carcinomas and a subset of serous carcinomas (the so-called low-grade serous carcinomas) through benign and borderline lesions. The relatively high incidence of BRAF and KRAS mutations in serous borderline tumours and low-grade serous carcinomas, and their extremely low incidence/absence in high-grade serous carcinomas, provide strong evidence that high-grade carcinomas do not arise through this intermediate step.     

Low-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary contain very few point mutations

It has been well established that ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinomas are fundamentally different types of tumours. While the molecular genetic features of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas are now well known, the pathogenesis of low-grade serous carcinomas, apart from the recognition of frequent somatic mutations involving KRAS and BRAF, is largely unknown. In order to comprehensively analyse somatic mutations in low-grade serous carcinomas, we applied exome sequencing to the DNA of eight samples of affinity-purified, low-grade, serous carcinomas. A remarkably small number of mutations were identified in seven of these tumours: a total of 70 somatic mutations in 64 genes. The eighth case displayed mixed serous and endometrioid features and a mutator phenotype with 783 somatic mutations, including a nonsense mutation in the mismatch repair gene, MSH2. We validated representative mutations in an additional nine low-grade serous carcinomas and 10 serous borderline tumours, the precursors of ovarian low-grade, serous carcinomas. Overall, the genes showing the most frequent mutations were BRAF and KRAS, occurring in 10 (38%) and 5 (19%) of 27 low-grade tumours, respectively. Except for a single case with a PIK3CA mutation, other mutations identified in the discovery set were not detected in the validation set of specimens. Our mutational analysis demonstrates that point mutations are much less common in low-grade serous tumours of the ovary than in other adult tumours, a finding with interesting scientific and clinical implications.     

Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis

The pathogenesis of ovarian carcinoma, the most lethal gynecological malignancy, is unknown because of the lack of a tumor progression model. Based on a review of recent clinicopathological and molecular studies, we propose a model for their development. In this model, surface epithelial tumors are divided into two broad categories designated type I and type II tumors that correspond to two main pathways of tumorigenesis. Type I tumors tend to be low-grade neoplasms that arise in a stepwise manner from borderline tumors whereas type II tumors are high-grade neoplasms for which morphologically recognizable precursor lesions have not been identified, so-called de novo development. As serous tumors are the most common surface epithelial tumors, low-grade serous carcinoma is the prototypic type I tumor and high-grade serous carcinoma is the prototypic type II tumor. In addition to low-grade serous carcinomas, type I tumors are composed of mucinous carcinomas, endometrioid carcinomas, malignant Brenner tumors, and clear cell carcinomas. Type I tumors are associated with distinct molecular changes that are rarely found in type II tumors, such as BRAF and KRAS mutations for serous tumors, KRAS mutations for mucinous tumors, and beta-catenin and PTEN mutations and microsatellite instability for endometrioid tumors. Type II tumors include high-grade serous carcinoma, malignant mixed mesodermal tumors (carcinosarcoma), and undifferentiated carcinoma. There are very limited data on the molecular alterations associated with type II tumors except frequent p53 mutations in high-grade serous carcinomas and malignant mixed mesodermal tumors (carcinosarcomas). This model of carcinogenesis reconciles the relationship of borderline tumors to invasive carcinoma and provides a morphological and molecular framework for studies aimed at elucidating the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer.     

Molekularpathologie der epithelialen Ovarialneoplasien

Despite the fact that ovarian carcinomas are phenotypically heterogeneous, they can be divided into two main groups with common pathogenetic mechanisms. Based on clinical, pathological and molecular parameters, a relatively large group of tumors can be distinguished with stepwise development from benign precursors and borderline tumors to invasive carcinomas (type I). Depending on the morphological phenotype, characteristic genetic changes can be observed, such as mutations in KRAS and BRAF in serous borderline tumors and low-grade serous carcinomas. Mutations in KRAS are also frequently detected in mucinous borderline tumors and mucinous carcinomas. The group of endometrioid tumors is characterized by mutations in components of the Wnt-signal transduction pathway and PTEN or microsatellite instability. The second large group of tumors (type II) includes tumors with "de novo" development of highly malignant carcinomas such as the conventional (moderately to poorly differentiated) high-grade serous carcinomas, undifferentiated carcinomas and malignant mixed mesodermal tumors. These tumors are associated with frequent mutations in p53 and complex chromosomal alterations. In the future, the combined analysis of morphological parameters, genetic changes, gene-expression profiling and protein data will reveal possible diagnostic and therapeutic targets for ovarian carcinomas.     

Human papilloma virus (HPV) status, p16INK4a, and p53 overexpression in epithelial malignant and borderline ovarian neoplasms

This investigation is the first to evaluate simultaneously human papilloma virus (HPV) status, p16(INK4a), and p53 immunoreactivity in epithelial ovarian neoplasms. The results were analyzed and correlated with histological type, histological grade, and survival of patients. Subtypes considered are papillary serous and mucinous. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, performed in our previous study, had already demonstrated a small number of HPV-positive epithelial ovarian neoplasms. No significant correlation was found between the presence of HPV DNA and subtypes of ovarian neoplasms; thus, HPV cannot be considered responsible for epithelial ovarian neoplasm. Since p16 immunoreactivity was present in many other HPV-negative cases of epithelial ovarian neoplasms, this study suggests that p16 overexpression in some neoplasms of the female genital tract is not related to HPV carcinogenesis. A higher p53 expression rate observed between borderline and malignant serous tumors and between serous and mucinous neoplasms can confirm a recent dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis. According to this theory, low-grade serous carcinomas (serous intraepithelial carcinomas, serous borderline neoplasm, and ovarian mucinous neoplasms) (type I tumors) develop from mutations of KAS and BRAF, while high-grade serous carcinomas (type II tumors) develop from mutation of p53. In malignant neoplasms, for univariate analysis, patient survival seems to be related to p53, strong and diffuse p16 overexpression, and the stage of development of neoplasms at the diagnosis. In multinomial logistic regression, used to evaluate the role of staging, grading, p16 and p53 immunopositivity as predictor variables of unfavorable outcome of the disease, only p16 positivity was significantly related to the poor prognosis of the cancer.     

Molecular genetic analysis of ovarian serous cystadenomas

Ovarian serous cystadenomas are common ovarian lesions that may be precursors of serous borderline tumors, which can in turn progress to low-grade serous carcinomas. It has been shown that low-grade serous carcinoma and serous borderline tumors are characterized by frequent mutations in BRAF or KRAS genes, but the mutational status of these genes in serous cystadenomas and the clonal nature of serous cystadenomas have not been fully investigated. We isolated cyst-lining epithelium from 30 consecutive serous cystadenomas, and analyzed their BRAF and KRAS mutational status. Wild-type sequences of BRAF and KRAS were detected in all specimens. Using the human androgen receptor gene as a polymorphic marker, we also examined the clonal status of epithelial cells in all of the serous cystadenomas. Four of 29 (14%) informative specimens were monoclonal based on the methylation pattern. These monoclonal cystadenomas were significantly (P<0.01) larger in size (>8 cm) than the nonclonal cystadenomas. These data indicate that serous cystadenomas do not contain mutations in either BRAF or KRAS genes and that most serous cystadenomas are polyclonal. Accordingly, it appears that serous cystadenomas develop as a hyperplastic expansion from epithelial inclusions with a clonal/neoplastic transformation occurring in a subset of them.     

Diverse tumorigenic pathways in ovarian serous carcinoma

This study was undertaken to analyze genetic alterations in 108 sporadic serous ovarian neoplasms to elucidate ovarian serous carcinogenesis. Our results demonstrate that K-ras mutations occur in approximately 50% of serous borderline tumors (SBTs), non-invasive micropapillary serous carcinomas (MPSCs), and invasive micropapillary serous carcinomas, which represent a morphological continuum of tumor progression. Moreover, progressive increase in the degree of allelic imbalance of chromosomes 1p, 5q, 8p, 18q, 22q, and Xp was observed comparing serous borderline tumors to noninvasive and invasive micropapillary serous carcinomas. In contrast, high-grade (conventional serous carcinoma) tumors contained wild-type K-ras in all 23 cases studied and a high frequency of allelic imbalance even in small (early) primary tumors similar to that found in advanced stage tumors. Based on these findings, we propose a dualistic model for ovarian serous carcinogenesis. One pathway involves a stepwise progression from SBT to noninvasive and then invasive MPSC. The other pathway is characterized by rapid progression from the ovarian surface epithelium or inclusion cysts to a conventional (high-grade) serous carcinoma.     

BRAF Mutation Is Rare in Advanced-Stage Low-Grade Ovarian Serous Carcinomas

Low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas are believed to arise via an adenoma-serous borderline tumor-serous carcinoma sequence. In this study, we found that advanced-stage, low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas both with and without adjacent serous borderline tumor shared similar regions of loss of heterozygosity. We then analyzed 91 ovarian tumor samples for mutations in TP53, BRAF, and KRAS. TP53 mutations were not detected in any serous borderline tumors (n = 30) or low-grade serous carcinomas (n = 43) but were found in 73% of high-grade serous carcinomas (n = 18). BRAF (n = 9) or KRAS (n = 5) mutation was detected in 47% of serous borderline tumors, but among the low-grade serous carcinomas (39 stage III, 2 stage II, and 2 stage I), only one (2%) had a BRAF mutation and eight (19%) had a KRAS mutation. The low frequency of BRAF mutations in advanced-stage, low-grade serous carcinomas, which contrasts with previous findings, suggests that aggressive, low-grade serous carcinomas are more likely derived from serous borderline tumors without BRAF mutation. In addition, advanced-stage, low-grade carcinoma patients with BRAF or KRAS mutation have a better apparent clinical outcome. However, further investigation is needed.Serous carcinoma is the most common histological subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer. Recent evidence strongly suggests that a two-tier system stratifying serous carcinoma into low-grade and high-grade categories is biologically and clinically relevant.^1–12 Low-grade serous carcinomas are believed to arise via an adenoma–serous borderline tumor–carcinoma sequence, whereas high-grade serous carcinomas develop from an unknown precursor.^6,7 While previous reports indicate that low-grade serous carcinomas may develop from either recurrence of a serous borderline tumor or de novo, the mechanism associated with the former type of development is not fully understood.^13–15 Almost all serous borderline tumors that recur are associated with noninvasive or invasive peritoneal implants (stages II–IV) at initial diagnosis of the serous borderline tumor.^13–17According to the World Health Organization, the pattern of serous borderline tumors may be classified as either typical or micropapillary.^15,18–21 The micropapillary pattern was initially described in 1996; accounts for 8% to 18% of serous borderline tumors; and is associated with a greater frequency of bilaterality, a greater association with peritoneal implants (particularly invasive implants), and a higher risk of relapse than the typical pattern of serous borderline tumor.^15,18–21 For all serous borderline tumors, regardless of the pattern, the risk of relapsing as low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma increases over time.²²Mutation analysis could provide insight into how low-grade serous carcinoma develops. The initial report on BRAF and KRAS mutations in low-grade serous carcinomas, which were believed to be derived from serous borderline tumors with micropapillary pattern, indicated a rate of BRAF or KRAS mutation of 68%.²³ Similarly, in serous borderline tumors, a rate of BRAF or KRAS mutation of 61% was reported.²³ However, in invasive high-grade serous carcinomas, BRAF and KRAS mutations were not found.^23–25 Conversely, TP53 mutations are quite common in high-grade serous carcinomas but exceedingly rare in serous borderline tumors and low-grade serous carcinomas.²⁶ However, the correlation of BRAF/KRAS with patient outcome in low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas has not been explored. In this study, we investigated the BRAF and KRAS mutation status of advanced-stage low-grade serous carcinomas with and without a background of serous borderline tumor at initial diagnosis.     

High-grade ovarian serous carcinoma exhibits significantly higher p16 expression than low-grade serous carcinoma and serous borderline tumour

AIMS: A dualistic pathway of ovarian serous carcinogenesis is now well established whereby high-grade serous carcinoma and low-grade serous carcinoma represent two distinct tumour types with a different underlying pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to compare expression of p16 INK4A (p16) in these two tumour types. We also included cases of serous borderline tumour, since these are considered to represent a precursor lesion of low-grade serous carcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cases of serous borderline tumour (n = 18), low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma (n = 22) and high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma (n = 24) were stained with a monoclonal antibody against p16. Cases were scored both with respect to intensity of immunoreactivity (weak, 1+; moderate, 2+; or strong, 3+) and distribution (0, negative or occasional positive cells; 1+, < 10% cells positive; 2+, 10-25% cells positive; 3+, 26-50% cells positive; 4+, 51-75% cells positive; or 5+, 76-100% cells positive). An immunohistochemical composite score was also calculated (0-15) by multiplying the intensity and distribution scores. There was a statistically significant difference in p16 immunoreactivity with respect to intensity, distribution and composite score between high-grade serous carcinoma and each of the other two groups, with the high-grade neoplasms exhibiting stronger and more diffuse positivity. Most high-grade serous carcinomas exhibited positivity of close to 100% of tumour cells. There was no significant difference in p16 expression between the borderline tumours and low-grade serous carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: The increased expression of p16 in high-grade serous carcinoma compared with low-grade serous carcinoma and serous borderline tumour is in keeping with a different underlying pathogenesis. p16 may be implicated in the development of high-grade serous neoplasia within the ovary and elsewhere within the female genital tract.     

Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer--shifting the paradigm

Recent morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic studies have led to the development of a new paradigm for the pathogenesis and origin of epithelial ovarian cancer based on a dualistic model of carcinogenesis that divides epithelial ovarian cancer into 2 broad categories designated types I and II. Type I tumors comprise low-grade serous, low-grade endometrioid, clear cell and mucinous carcinomas, and Brenner tumors. They are generally indolent, present in stage I (tumor confined to the ovary), and are characterized by specific mutations, including KRAS, BRAF, ERBB2, CTNNB1, PTEN, PIK3CA, ARID1A, and PPP2R1A, which target specific cell signaling pathways. Type I tumors rarely harbor TP53 mutations and are relatively stable genetically. Type II tumors comprise high-grade serous, high-grade endometrioid, malignant mixed mesodermal tumors (carcinosarcomas), and undifferentiated carcinomas. They are aggressive, present in advanced stage, and have a very high frequency of TP53 mutations but rarely harbor the mutations detected in type I tumors. In addition, type II tumors have molecular alterations that perturb expression of BRCA either by mutation of the gene or by promoter methylation. A hallmark of these tumors is that they are genetically highly unstable. Recent studies strongly suggest that fallopian tube epithelium (benign or malignant) that implants on the ovary is the source of low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma rather than the ovarian surface epithelium as previously believed. Similarly, it is widely accepted that endometriosis is the precursor of endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas and, as endometriosis, is thought to develop from retrograde menstruation; these tumors can also be regarded as involving the ovary secondarily. The origin of mucinous and transitional cell (Brenner) tumors is still not well established, although recent data suggest a possible origin from transitional epithelial nests located in paraovarian locations at the tuboperitoneal junction. Thus, it now appears that type I and type II ovarian tumors develop independently along different molecular pathways and that both types develop outside the ovary and involve it secondarily. If this concept is confirmed, it leads to the conclusion that the only true primary ovarian neoplasms are gonadal stromal and germ cell tumors analogous to testicular tumors. This new paradigm of ovarian carcinogenesis has important clinical implications. By shifting the early events of ovarian carcinogenesis to the fallopian tube and endometrium instead of the ovary, prevention approaches, for example, salpingectomy with ovarian conservation, may play an important role in reducing the burden of ovarian cancer while preserving hormonal function and fertility.     

Neuroendocrine cells in cystic mucinous tumours of the ovary

This histogenesis of cystic mucinous ovarian tumours is still controversial. It has been proposed that these neoplasms may arise from metaplastic ovarian surface epithelium. Others have suggested that these tumours represent monophyletic (intestinal) types of teratoma. Against this background we have studied the presence of different types of neuroendocrine cells in a series of cystic mucinous ovarian tumours. Argyrophil neuroendocrine cells were found almost exclusively in tumours which were histologically classified as borderline or low-grade mucinous carcinomas, whereas these cells were very rare in mucinous cystadenomas and in grade III and IV carcinomas. Several gut peptide hormones could be demonstrated in these cells, but only in borderline tumours and low-grade mucinous carcinomas. Mucin histochemistry did not reveal characteristic patterns in these neoplasms. The results confirm that with regard to the presence of endocrine cells the epithelium of borderline mucinous cystadenomas and mucinous cystadenocarcinomas bears strong resemblance to intestinal epithelium. These findings do not rule out the possibility that these tumours arise by metaplasia from ovarian germinal epithelium but are equally compatible with a teratomatous origin. The epithelium of most benign mucinous cystadenomas resembles that of ovarian inclusion cysts.     

Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2 and 5 are differentially regulated in ovarian cancer of different histologic types.

The family of insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs) comprises six members, which bind and regulate the functions of insulin-like growth factors. Overexpression of IGFBP2 and IGFBP5 contributes to the invasiveness and progression of several human cancers, but their role and clinical significance in ovarian cancer has not been investigated in detail. We examined IGFBP2 and IGFBP5 expression levels using two tissue microarrays, one containing six normal surface epithelium, six benign serous cysts, 10 serous borderline tumors, eight low-grade, and 20 high-grade serous carcinomas. The other comprising 441 ovarian cancers of different histologic types linked to a clinicopathologic database. Each tumor was sampled in duplicate with a 1.0-mm punch core needle. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using antibodies against IGFBP2 or IGFBP5. The staining intensity was scored semiquantitatively as negative (0), weak (1-10%), moderate (10-50%), or strong (50-100%) using computerized image analysis. Statistical analyses used Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier method. IGFBP2 and IGFBP5 were overexpressed in high-grade serous carcinomas compared to normal surface epithelium, benign serous cysts, serous borderline tumors, or low-grade serous carcinoma. They were differentially expressed in different types of ovarian carcinomas, being more often expressed at high levels in high-grade serous carcinoma, malignant mixed mullerian tumors and undifferentiated carcinoma, and more often expressed at low levels or not at all in clear cell and mucinous carcinomas. We concluded that IGFBP2 and IGFBP5 might play a role in the development of high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma, but not in mucinous or clear cell ovarian carcinomas.     

My approach to and thoughts on the typing of ovarian carcinomas

Ovarian carcinomas of epithelial type comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, each with a different underlying pathogenesis and natural behaviour. Accurate classification of ovarian carcinomas is important since each type may be associated with a different behaviour, natural history and outcome. Precise classification is also critical to determine whether alternative therapeutic strategies are appropriate for different tumour types. Previous studies have shown significant interobserver variation in the typing of ovarian carcinomas. There are several areas where there are particular difficulties; these include the distinction between high-grade serous and endometrioid adenocarcinomas and the distinction between a true clear cell carcinoma and clear cell areas within other adenocarcinomas. This review details my approach to the typing of ovarian carcinomas. Morphological assessment, which remains the mainstay in diagnosis, can be supplemented by immunohistochemistry which, for example, is useful in the distinction between serous carcinomas (WT1 positive) and other carcinomas (generally WT1 negative). In recent years, there has been emerging new information regarding the major underlying molecular events in several types of ovarian carcinoma. This has resulted in the acceptance that there are two distinct types of ovarian serous carcinoma. These are termed low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma, but represent two distinct tumour types rather than low-grade and high-grade variants of the same neoplasm. The integration of clinical, morphological and molecular data has resulted in a more precise classification of ovarian carcinomas and has resulted in the proposal for a broad dualistic pathway of ovarian epithelial carcinogenesis with, in general, low-grade type 1 tumours evolving from benign and borderline neoplasms through a well-defined adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and high-grade type 2 neoplasms arising from an, as yet, undefined precursor lesion.     

Evolution of the concept and termiology of borderline ovarian tumours

The borderline category of ovarian tumours was established in the early 1970s because of the observation that a group of proliferative epithelial ovarian tumours lacking invasion that generally behaved in a benign fashion occasionally pursued an indolent malignant course. Over the last 25 years, a large database on these tumours has been accrued. Recent studies suggest that the borderline group can now be subclassified into benign and malignant neoplasms. The survival for patients with serous borderline tumours confined to the ovaries is virtually 100%. Patients with ovarian serous borderline tumours with invasive peritoneal implants have a 34% mortality rate; therefore, these cases are classified as low grade carcinomas. Micropapillary serous carcinoma, a distinctive neoplasm that fails to display unequivocal evidence of invasion and therefore has been included in the borderline category, is strongly associated with invasive implants and recurs as invasive carcinoma. After these neoplasms with invasive implants are excluded from the group of tumours classified as borderline, the remaining advanced stage serous borderline tumours (those with non-invasive implants) have a disease-specific survival rate of nearly 100% and should be considered benign. In a similar fashion, the vast majority of mucinous borderline tumours reported to display aggressive behaviour have been associated with the clinical syndrome of pseudomyxoma peritonei. It is now clear that pseudomyxoma peritonei is a condition of appendiceal origin in virtually all cases. In addition, there is a small group of mucinous carcinomas typically from the pancreas and biliary system that present with relatively bland-appearing metastases to the ovaries that closely simulate mucinous borderline tumours. Once these metastatic carcinomas and mucinous tumours associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei are removed from the borderline category, the remaining mucinous borderline tumours are always confined to the ovaries and have a benign behaviour. Finally, review of the literature indicates the other epithelial types of borderline tumours (endometrioid, clear cell and transitional cell) behave in a benign fashion. Since borderline tumours can now be classified into benign and malignant types, the borderline category has no further utility and can be abandoned. This will be of great benefit to patients and clinicians, and will also help in more clearly focusing research efforts on ovarian cancer.     

Uncommon ovarian epithelial tumours

Epithelial ovarian tumours represent the most common type of ovarian tumour. Most of malignant cases represent high-grade serous, clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas; borderline serous and mucinous tumours of intestinal type are less common. This review focuses on the uncommon or rare epithelial tumours of the ovary which include borderline and malignant Brenner tumours, the recently-described mesonephric-like carcinoma of the ovary, and primary ovarian neuroendocrine tumours, with emphasis on helpful and diagnostic features.     

Genomic imbalances in ovarian borderline serous and mucinous tumors

We analyzed 25 ovarian borderline tumors (13 serous and 12 mucinous tumors) by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Genomic imbalance was detected in 85% of serous tumors and 75% of mucinous tumors. Different patterns of genomic alterations were identified in serous and mucinous tumors. Gain of the X chromosome was common in both serous (30%) and mucinous (42%) tumors. However, gain of chromosome 8 was detected exclusively in 38% of serous and mixed sero-mucinous tumors, but not in any pure mucinous tumors. According to the present and previous studies, gain of chromosome 8 is the most common abnormality in borderline serous tumors. Gain of the same chromosome is also common in high grade and advanced stage serous carcinomas, but uncommon in early stage serous carcinomas. In addition gain of chromosome X is common in borderline serous and mucinous tumors, while loss of chromosome X is predominant in invasive carcinomas. These findings do not support the multi-step progression theory from borderline tumor to high-grade, advanced stage carcinoma, but indicate that the borderline ovarian tumor is a distinct entity. Genes in chromosome 8 may be critical for the development and the differentiation of borderline serous tumors.     

Ovarian carcinoma: current diagnostic principles

Ovarian cancer is the most common cause of death from a gynecologic cancer. The most common types of ovarian cancer are carcinomas of surface epithelial-stromal origin. Ovarian carcinomas are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms. Based on proposed different pathways of tumorigenesis, these tumors are divided into two broad subgroups (type I and II) with different biologic behaviour, prognosis and response to therapy. Type I tumors include low-grade serous adenocarcinoma, low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, malignant Brenner tumor and some clear cell carcinomas. These tumors are low-grade neoplasms evolving from a defined precursor lesion. Type II tumors are high-grade neoplasms including undifferentiated carcinoma, high-grade serous adenocarcinoma, high-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma, malignant mixed Müllerian tumor and probably some clear cell carcinomas. At present, the histological type of ovarian carcinoma has only limited impact on the management of these tumors. However, with progress towards the type-specific treatment of ovarian carcinoma, accurate histopathological diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma becomes increasingly important. In this review we summarize recent advances in the histopathological diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma. Moreover, we mention genetic changes in different types of ovarian carcinoma.     

Subtype-specific mutation of PPP2R1A in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas

PPP2R1A mutations have recently been described in 3/42 (7%) of clear cell carcinomas of the ovary. PPP2R1A encodes the α-isoform of the scaffolding subunit of the serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) holoenzyme. This putative tumour suppressor complex is involved in growth and survival pathways. Through targeted sequencing of PPP2R1A, we identified somatic missense mutations in 40.8% (20/49) of high-grade serous endometrial tumours, and 5.0% (3/60) of endometrial endometrioid carcinomas. Mutations were also identified in ovarian tumours at lower frequencies: 12.2% (5/41) of endometrioid and 4.1% (2/49) of clear cell carcinomas. No mutations were found in 50 high-grade and 12 low-grade serous carcinomas. Amino acid residues affected by these mutations are highly conserved across species and are involved in direct interactions with regulatory B-subunits of the PP2A holoenzyme. PPP2R1A mutations in endometrial high-grade serous carcinomas are a frequent and potentially targetable feature of this disease. The finding of frequent PPP2R1A mutations in high-grade serous carcinoma of the endometrium but not in high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary provides clear genetic evidence that these are distinct diseases.     

Expression of Rsf-1, a chromatin-remodeling gene, in ovarian and breast carcinoma

Rsf-1 protein is a member of a chromatin-remodeling complex that plays an important role in regulating gene expression and cell proliferation. Our previous study showed that Rsf-1 was an amplified gene that participated in the development of ovarian serous carcinoma. To further elucidate the role of Rsf-1 in ovarian cancer, we studied Rsf-1 immunoreactivity in 294 ovarian tumors of various histologic types. Because the Rsf-1 amplicon overlaps an amplified region reported in breast cancer, we included 782 neoplastic and normal breast tissues for comparison. Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays using a 4-tiered scoring system. Overexpression of Rsf-1 was defined as a nuclear immunointensity of 3+ to 4+ because of a strong correlation between 3+ and 4+ immunointensity and Rsf-1 gene amplification, based on our previous fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Rsf-1 overexpression was observed in 25% of high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas and in only rare cases (<7%) of low-grade ovarian serous, ovarian endometrioid, and invasive breast carcinomas but not in any ovarian serous borderline tumors, ovarian clear cell carcinomas, ovarian mucinous carcinomas, intraductal carcinomas of the breast, and normal ovaries and breast tissues. Thus, overexpression of Rsf-1 was significantly associated with high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma (P < .05), as compared with other types of ovarian tumors and breast carcinomas. Our results provide evidence that Rsf-1 expression is primarily confined to high-grade serous carcinoma, the most aggressive ovarian cancer. Because Rsf-1 overexpression occurs in only a small number of breast carcinomas, it is unlikely that Rsf-1 is a critical gene in the development of breast carcinoma.