A clinical comparison of different film systems for radiotherapy portal imaging.

Portal films are an important tool for verification of the shaping and positioning of external radiation fields to the target volume in radiotherapy. One limitation of port films is their inherent lack of contrast, which is due to the low attenuation of the exposing megavoltage radiation by the tissues being imaged. Recently, Kodak introduced a new portal film-cassette system, Kodak EC-L, with much improved contrast compared with conventional film. The aim of this study was to determine if the enhanced contrast of the Kodak EC-L system actually provides better clinical results. To simulate clinical use, port films were taken using an anthropomorphic phantom that was artificially shifted and/or rotated by a predetermined distance. Identical images were taken using a conventional port film system (AGFA-Gevaert Curix MR4 in lead-lined cassette) and the Kodak EC-L system. Twelve different operators (6 physicists and 6 radiation therapists) were asked to diagnose the problem from a total of 20 port films (10 per treatment site), allowing for direct comparison of the 2 types of films. While the diagnosis of the field displacement improved using the Kodak film, it did not speed-up the decision-making process. It was also found that experienced operators were more accurate at evaluating the films. The results indicate that, for the situations studied (head and neck, pelvis), the Kodak system exhibits better contrast and leads to improved decision making.     

Characterization of new portal film systems for radiotherapy verification.

Portal images are an important verification tool in radiotherapy. Their use has been limited by their poor image quality, which is due to the inherent lack of contrast at megavoltage energies. Recently CEA and Kodak have introduced new portal film-cassette systems with much improved contrast. We have determined the H-D curves for these systems and found the gamma (gamma) for the CEA system (8.5) to be larger than that for the Kodak EC-L system (6.3). The optimal doses were CEA TLF 1.2 cGy, CEA TVS 15.9 cGy and Kodak EC-L 1.5 cGy. We also obtained phantom images that were evaluated by 11 radiotherapists. They ranked the CEA B High Plus cassette with CEA TVS film the highest, followed by the Kodak EC-L system. Some clinical films of a lateral pelvis are also presented, to demonstrate the improvement in image quality with these new film systems as compared with conventional portal films.     

Contrast improvement in a new radiotherapy imaging system

PURPOSE: The aim of this paper is to compare the EC-L Kodak system for radiation therapy beam localization with a conventional one that could be daily employed in a radiotherapy department. BACKGROUND: The main purpose of portal images is to verify the treatment volume in actual clinical conditions. Low contrast is the main constraint affecting portal film image. METHODS: Kodak proposes a new imaging system (film and cassette) characterized by contrast enhancement as imaging standard for radiotherapy. The evaluation of system contrast was carried out by using a step-wedge consisting in 4 60 x 60 mm plexiglas steps and an anthropomorphic phantom. Portal films were exposed to a 6 MV photon beam by a linear accelerator (Varian Clinac 1800) with a 250 x 340 mm field size at the 1000 mm source film distance. The 2 imaging system performances were evaluated analyzing the image optical density. RESULTS: The use of the Kodak system results in a real contrast improvement, so it is satisfactory to describe the field placement as to the region of interest. CONCLUSIONS: The most critical characteristic attaining this method regards low contrast, i. e. the small optical density difference existing between different anatomical regions on the film. Since radiographic techniques can significantly influence quality of portal films, the adequate choice of film and screen combination, as well as the exposure technique is particularly useful in a radiotherapy quality assurance program.     

A comparison of two different T-grain films in rare-earth screens with a standard film-screen combination for intravenous pyelography and bone examinations

T-grain film is claimed to give significantly improved image quality, allowing the use of faster screens without loss of quality and thus reducing radiation dose. We tested this claim for two systems. In each case comparison was made with our usual screen-film combination, Agfa Curix RP1 film with Kodak Xomatic Regular screens (a nominally 200 speed system). The systems tested were Kodak TMatG in Kodak Lanex Medium screens (300 speed) and Agfa STG in Kodak Lanex Regular screens (400 speed). The Agfa STG-Lanex Regular system performed less well than the standard system for intravenous pyelograms (IVPs), bones and soft-tissue detail. Its speed advantage was not apparent below 70 kV. The Kodak TMatG-Lanex Medium system was better than the standard system for IVPs but not as good for bones. It gave virtually no speed advantage below 90 kV. Kodak T-grain film in a medium-speed, rare-earth screen was found to be better than the standard system for IVPs. Agfa T-grain film in a fast rare-earth screen was unsatisfactory for IVPs. Neither combination was as good as the standard system for bones.     

Portal Verification Using the KODAK ACR 2000 RT Storage Phosphor Plate System and EC® Films

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The suitability of the storage phosphor plate system ACR 2000 RT (Eastman Kodak Corp., Rochester, MN, USA), that is destined for portal verification as well as for portal simulation imaging in radiotherapy, had to be proven by the comparison with a highly sensitive verification film. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The comparison included portal verification images of different regions (head and neck, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis) irradiated with 6- and 15-MV photons and electrons. Each portal verification image was done at the storage screen and the EC film as well, using the EC-L cassettes (both: Eastman Kodak Corp., Rochester, MN, USA) for both systems. The soft-tissue and bony contrast and the brightness were evaluated and compared in a ranking of the two compared images. Different phantoms were irradiated to investigate the high- and low-contrast resolution. To account for quality assurance application, the short-time exposure of the unpacked and irradiated storage screen by green and red room lasers was also investigated. RESULTS: In general, the quality of the processed ACR images was slightly higher than that of the films, mostly due to cases of an insufficient exposure to the film. The storage screen was able to verify electron portals even for low electron energies with only minor photon contamination. The laser lines were sharply and clearly visible on the ACR images. CONCLUSION: The ACR system may replace the film without any noticeable decrease in image quality thereby reducing processing time and saving the costs of films and avoiding incorrect exposures.     

Monitorbeurteilung digitalisierter und nachbearbeiteter Feldkontrollaufnahmen im Vergleich zu konventionellen Feldkontrollaufnahmen am Röntgenschaukasten

Purpose

Judgement of image quality and detail recognition of digitized and post-processed portal films presented on a computer monitor compared to the present standard, conventional portal films presented on a light-box.

Material and Methods

Conventional portal films of 3 different tumor sites (10 pelvis, 10 cranium, 10 vertebral column) were presented to a panel of 8 observers in 3 different manners: conventional film presented on a light-box (Conv), digitized non-post-processed images (Dig-1) and digitized post-processed images (Dig-2) presented on a high-resolution computer monitor. Subjective judgement of image quality, detail recognition and time requirement of conventional films compared to monitor presentation were evaluated using a 5-scaled questionnaire (from 1=much better to 5=much worse). Furthermore the observers had to point out predefined anatomical bony structures on the conventional films (Conv) as well as on the digitized post-processed images (Dig-2). Standard deviations of the landmarks outlined by 10 different observers were used as a criterion of objective detail recognition (Figure 1).

Results

Image quality of digitized post-processed images presented on the computer monitor was judged statistical significant better than of conventional films (pelvis 78%, vertebral column 62%, cranium 45% better) (Figure 3). Similar results were found for comparison of detail recognition: digitized post-processed images were scored better for pelvis in 81%, for vertebral column in 57%, for cranium in 40% (Figure 4, Table 1). Most benefit from portal film enhancement was found for pelvic images, where portal films are known to be of poor image quality (Figure 2). In contrast image quality of non-processed digital images compared to conventional films was graded worse (pelvis 69%, vertebral column 53%, cranium 71% worse) (Figure 4). Digital post-processed images were especially for the pelvis judged to require less time (pelvis 68%, vertebral column 26%, cranium 8% less time requirement) (Figure 5). For the pelvis a statistical significant decrease of standard deviations was found for Dig-2 compared to conventional films, indicating an objective increase of image quality and detail recognition (Table 2). In case of vertebral column and cranium no significant differences were evaluated (Table 3).

Conclusions

Digitized enhanced portal films presented on a computer monitor resulted in a quicker assessment and equal to better image quality as well as detail recognition compared to conventional films. Non-processed digitized images were judged to be of less image quality.     

A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films

In this study, four general purpose radiographic films (Agfa Gevaert Curix RP-1, duPont Cronex 4, Fuji RX, and Kodak XRP-1) were compared using three independent techniques. By examining the characteristic curves for the four films, film speed and contrast were compared over the diagnostically useful density range. These curves were generated using three methods: (1) irradiation of a standard film cassette lined with high-speed screens, covered by a twelve-step aluminum wedge; (2) direct exposure of film strips to an electro-luminescent sensitometer; and (3) direct irradiation of a standard film cassette lined with high-speed screens. The latter technique provided quantitative values for film speed and relative contrast. All three techniques provided virtually properly identical results and indicate that under properly controlled conditions simplified methods of film testing can give results equivalent to those obtained by more sophisticated techniques.     

Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography

In this study the effect of different mammographic screen-film combinations on image quality and breast dose, and the correlation between the various image quality parameters, breast dose and the sensitometric parameters of a film were investigated. Three Agfa (MR5-II, HDR, HT), two Kodak (Min-R M, Min-R 2000), one Fuji (AD-M), one Konica (CM-H) and one Ferrania (HM plus) single emulsion mammographic films were combined with three intensifying screens (Agfa HDS, Kodak Min-R 2190 and Fuji AD-MA). The film characteristics were determined by sensitometry, while the image quality and the dose to the breast of the resulting 24 screen-film combinations were assessed using a mammography quality control phantom. For each combination, three images of the phantom were acquired with optical density within three different ranges. Two observers assessed the quality of the 72 phantom images obtained, while the breast dose was calculated from the exposure data required for each image. Large differences among screen-film combinations in terms of image quality and breast dose were identified however, that, could not be correlated with the film's sensitometric characteristics. All films presented the best resolution when combined with the HDS screen at the expense of speed, and the largest speed when combined with the AD-MA screen, without degradation of the overall image quality. However, an ideal screen-film combination presenting the best image quality with the least dose was not identified. It is also worth mentioning that the best performance for a film was not necessarily obtained when this was combined with the screen provided by the same manufacturer. The results of this study clearly demonstrate that comparison of films based on their sensitometric characteristics are of limited value for clinical practice, as their performance is strongly affected by the screens with which they are combined.     

A demonstration comparing film mammography with the new high sensitivity xeromammography

The author has performed a subjective comparison of breast images recorded with a new liquid-toner xerographic system and images of the same breasts recorded on Kodak OM-1 film exposed with a MinR screen and a 5 to 1 grid. The xeromammograms are judged to be superior to the mammograms recorded on film with respect to: (1) the demonstration of calcifications, circumscribed masses, and the back of the breast; (2) the "resolution" of dense connective tissue; and (3) the overall image quality. Radiation doses to the breast associated with the two types of study are said to be comparable. Thirteen pairs of excellent images comparing xeromammograms with conventional breast films are presented.     

The Electronic Portal Imaging System Siemens Beamview Plus® Versus the Conventional Verification Films CEA-TVS® and DuPont CQL-7®A Critical Appraisal of Visual Image Quality

AIM: The aim of this study was the validation of the visual image quality of electronic portal imaging devices (EPID) and conventional verification films from the point of view of the end-viewers of portal films, the radiotherapists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The verification image was represented in two different forms, viz. an electronic portal image employing Siemens Beamview Plus (on a computer monitor) and two different portal films using the conventional verification films CEA-TVS and DuPont CQL-7 (on a negatoscope). A total of 270 image sets (simulation film and portal image) were evaluated by each radiotherapist, evaluation extending to 90 sets of each type of verification film. Each set was evaluated by three specialists in radiotherapy examining subjective visual image quality whereby the following aspects served as evaluation criteria: contrast, artifacts, determination of actual radiation field edge position, anatomical structures and main structural feature for the determination of treatment field position. In addition, the anatomical structures employed for visual feature correlation between reference and portal films were classified according to their importance. RESULTS: In general the electronic portal image was rated significantly "visible" or better. Only the evaluation of artifacts showed an appreciable disadvantage for electronic portal imaging caused by physical artifacts due to radiographic technique and data processing aspects peculiar to the Siemens Beamview Plus 1.1. and also caused by different image processing tools reducing physical artifacts and enhancing the visibility of anatomical structures and likewise of anatomical artifacts (e.g. intestinal gas). By calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient to detect a possible relationship between the different criteria of subjective visual image quality, the research demonstrated that artifacts when limited to a tolerable proportion had no significant impact on the other criteria. CONCLUSIONS: As data of EPIDS are digital, images can be postprocessed and enhanced in a wide variety of ways. Using this tool the electronic portal imaging device provides images that, in terms of visual image quality, are at least comparable to the two evaluated types of radiographic films and also have the added advantage that such images are stored and can be transferred electronically being presupposition for digital patient documentation.     

In Vivo Verification of Electron Beam Energy by Patient Exit Dose and Optical Density of Portal Films

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The depth-dose curve of electron beams is mainly determined by their energy. For accelerators with scatter foils, the electron energy can, in principle, be verified by measuring the amount of the contaminating photons. This paper investigates whether exit dose measurements and evaluations of the optical density of portal films can be used to verify the energy of the electron beam in a clinically relevant setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During irradiation of the head and neck region of an Alderson-Rando phantom with 6- to 21-MeV electron beams, the exit dose rates behind the phantom and the dose rates at the position of a film cassette were measured. The optical density of films (EC film/EC-L Regular and EC-L Fast cassettes, Eastman Kodak Comp., Rochester, NY, USA) exposed to beams of different energies was evaluated. RESULTS: The exit and the cassette dose rates showed a steep increase with increasing electron energy. Due to its density behavior, the film with both types of cassettes failed to generate images for lower electron energies (6 and 9 MeV) but presented a strong ascent of the optical density-until reaching the saturation-with increasing electron energy. CONCLUSION: Measurements of the exit dose and evaluations of the optical density of portal films can be used to verify and document the energy of electron beams during radiotherapy.     

A comparison of mammography screen-film combinations.

A comparison study was performed to evaluate the image quality and radiation dose of six mammographic screen-film combinations: a Min-R screen with OM-1, SO-155, and SO-177 films (Eastman Kodak); a Min-R medium screen (Eastman Kodak) with OM-1 film; an HR Mammo medium screen (Fuji Medical Systems USA) with OM-1 film; and a Min-R fast screen with T-Mat M II film (Eastman Kodak). SO-177 films were processed with an extended cycle. Exposures of an acrylic test object with embedded masses, fibers, and specks and of a preserved breast specimen were made, for two paired image comparison tests in which the visibility of diagnostic features, contrast, and noise were judged. In most areas of image quality evaluated, a Min-R screen with OM-1, SO-155, and SO-177 films was superior. These three screen-film combinations had similar imaging characteristics, even though OM-1 film requires a higher radiation exposure. Images produced with a Min-R fast screen and T-Mat M II film were significantly lower in quality.     

Evaluation of radiographs developed by a new ultrarapid film processing system

The image quality of radiographs developed by a new ultrarapid processor was evaluated to determine if faster processing causes degradation in the image. The processor used was the Konica Super-Rapid SRX-501 model. Two films designed for this processor (Konica MGH-SR and MGL-SR) were processed in 45 sec and were compared with standard rapid processing in 90 sec of corresponding conventional films (Kodak TMG and OC). Rare-earth screens (Kodak Lanex Regular and Lanex Medium) used with the new and conventional films interleaved during angiographic studies or for phantom images were assessed for image quality. The basic imaging properties of the screen-film systems were examined by measuring (1) Hurter and Driffield curves, (2) modulation transfer functions by using the slit method, and (3) noise Wiener spectra. Subjective clinical assessment showed that the images obtained with ultrarapid processing were acceptable, with increased contrast and graininess. Hurter and Driffield curve measurements confirmed higher gradients. Modulation transfer function measurements were the same as for the conventional films. Noise Wiener spectrum measurements showed a 10% increase in noise for MGH-SR vs TMG film and a 30% increase for MGL-SR vs OC film. We conclude that acceptable image quality can be obtained using ultrarapid processing, with processing time approximately 60% that of conventional rapid processing. Potential applications include all areas in which rapid availability of the radiograph for interpretation is important. Although the processor studied was the first of its kind available, our evaluation indicates that the technology is available for a new class of ultrarapid processors.     

Portal Verification of High-Energy Electron Beams Using their Photon Contamination by Film-Cassette Systems

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Though electron beams are widely used in radiotherapy, their verification is not well established in clinical practice. The present study compares the suitability of several sensitive film-cassette systems for electron-portal verification by contaminating photons. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The characteristics of the optical density curves of film-cassette combinations were determined by exposing them to the bremsstrahlung contamination of a variety of electron beams. Using a Las-Vegas Phantom the spatial low-contrast resolution of the combinations was investigated. The absorbed dose rates due to the contaminant photons were measured for different geometric conditions. RESULTS: Suitable film-cassette combinations were found for portal verification of all usual electron energies. The best image quality was obtained using the EC film and the EC-L cassettes. For electron energies higher than 6 MeV some film-cassette combinations are suitable to verify abutted electron and photon portals using the same film sheet. CONCLUSION: The verification of electron portals and of abutted electron-photon portals can be performed by sensitive film-cassette systems with an image quality comparable to photon-beam verification.     

Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of exhaustion of five different processing solutions on the sensitometric properties of four dental X-ray films: Ektaspeed Plus and Ultra-speed (Kodak Eastman Co. Rochester, USA) and new and previous Dentus M2 (Agfa-Gevaert, Mortsel, Belgium). METHODS: An aluminum stepwedge was used to construct characteristic curves for the four films. All films were processed manually using three sets of chemicals for manual processing: Agfa (Heraeus Kulzer, Dormagen, Germany), Kodak (Kodak-Pathé, Paris, France) and Demat (Viscopac, Athens, Greece) and two sets for automatic processing: Dürr XR and Periomat (Dürr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany). Film speed and gradient were evaluated until the chemicals were completely exhausted. An analysis of variance was performed separately for each set of chemicals for manual and automatic processing. RESULTS: Ektaspeed Plus was the fastest film in the manual processing solutions. The new Dentus M2 and Ektaspeed Plus films had similar speed using the chemicals for automatic processing. Ultra-speed had the lowest speed in all solutions, but it had the greatest consistency. Exhaustion of the developer caused a comparable decrease in speed of Ektaspeed Plus and the two Dentus M2 films. In fresh chemistry Agfa was the strongest manual processing solution, but it had the highest exhaustion rate. The Dürr XR chemical was stronger than Periomat over the whole test period. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of film and processing solution is an important factor for achieving constant sensitometric properties. Ektaspeed Plus and the new Dentus M2 film should be used in dental practice, as they require lower exposure and have equivalent or superior properties compared with Ultra-speed.     

The impact of technical conditions of X-ray imaging on reproducibility and precision of digital computer-assisted X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR)

Objective To evaluate the reproducibility of imaging and analysis for bone mineral density (BMD) determination using digital computer-assisted X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR; Pronosco X-posure, version V.2, Sectra Pronosco, Denmark); to verify potential factors that influence BMD extrapolation such as tube voltage, film-focus distance (FFD), film quality and brand (Kodak T-MAT-Plus, Konika SRH, Agfa Scopix), imaging technology (conventional, digital), imaging system (Kodak, Agfa) and exposure level (mAs); and to clarify whether DXR analysis based on printouts of digital images is comparable to analysis of conventional images.Design and patients The hand of a cadaver was X-rayed using varied parameters: 4–8 mAs, 40–52 kV, 90–130 cm FFD. Radiographs under standardised conditions were performed 10 times using a conventional machine (Philips Super 80 CP) and the printouts of a digital system (Digital Diagnost Philips Optimus) for the analysis of reproducibility. One image was scanned and analysed 10 times additionally for imaging reproducibility.Results Reliability error of the system for the imaging process using conventional radiographs-rays was 0.49% (standard conditions: 6 mAs, 40 kV, 1 m FFD), using printouts of digital images was 2.89% (4 mAs, 42 kV, 1 m FFD) and regarding the analysis process was 0.22%. BMD calculation is not affected by alterations in FFD (precision error 1.21%), mAs (0.83%) or film quality/brand (0.38%), but differs significantly depending on tube voltage (2.70%). The system was not able to analyse conventional images with tube voltages of 49/52 kV.Conclusion DXR technology is stable with most of the tested parameters. Normative data should exclusively be used for calculations using similar tube voltage or correction factors. All other parameters had no significant influence on the BMD calculation. Reproducibility is high. For technical reasons it is not recommended to use the printouts of digital images for BMD determination.     

The effects of developer age on diagnostic accuracy: a study using assessment of endodontic file length.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of developer age on image quality. METHODS: Endodontic files, size 10 and 15, were placed in upper and lower molars and premolars up to the root apex or 1.5 mm short. A series of radiographs were made with each of three film types: Dentus M2 (Agfa-Gevaert, Mortsel, Belgium), Ektaspeed Plus and Ultra-speed (Kodak Eastman Co, Rochester, USA). The films were processed bi-weekly using the same Agfa chemicals (Heraeus Kulzer, Dormagen, Germany) over a 6-week period. An additional set of Dentus M2 films was processed using Periomat chemicals (Dürr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany). The films were viewed by eight dentists who rated the position of the tip of the file using a 5-point confidence scale. ROC data were analysed by means of analysis of variance. Az value was the dependent variable, whereas observer age group was entered as between subject factor. The null hypothesis was rejected when P<0.05. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracies of the three films were comparable during the first 4 weeks. In the sixth week Ultra-speed was significantly better than the other two films (P=0.046). The Periomat chemicals showed significantly greater consistency than the Agfa chemicals (P=0.004). Developer exhaustion significantly affected the performance of the older observers (P=0.008), especially when Agfa chemicals and file size 10 were used. CONCLUSION: Agfa chemicals older than 4 weeks significantly affect the assessment of endodontic file length. In earlier stages there are no significant differences between the three films tested. Dentus M2 and Ektaspeed Plus films should be used as they require lower exposures.     

Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the sensitometric properties of four dental films: Ektaspeed Plus and Ultra-speed (Kodak Eastman Co, Rochester, USA) and new and previous Dentus M2 (Agfa-Gevaert, Mortsel, Belgium) in five different processing solutions. METHODS: Characteristic curves were constructed for four dental X-ray films using five different processing solutions. All films were processed manually in three sets of chemicals for manual processing: Agfa (Heraeus Kulzer, Dormagen, Germany), Kodak (Kodak-Pathé, Paris, France) and Demat (Viscopac, Athens, Greece) and two sets of chemicals for automatic processing: Dürr XR and Periomat (Dürr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany). Analysis of variance and regression analysis was performed to examine the factors significantly affecting film density. RESULTS: The new Dentus M2 film had comparable gradient, higher speed and lower base-plus-fog than its predecessor. It had comparable speed with Ektaspeed Plus in chemicals for automatic processing. All films had a higher speed and lower gradient when processed in the chemicals for automatic processing. The highest film speed was achieved using Dürr XR chemicals. CONCLUSIONS: The new Agfa Dentus M2 film is an E-speed film and can be considered an alternative to Ektaspeed Plus: both can be recommended for use in dental practice as they contribute to dose reduction.     

Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions

The effect of different processing conditions on the sensitometric characteristics of mammographic films was investigated and the implications of this effect on clinical practice are discussed. Three Agfa (MR5-II, HDR and HT), two Kodak (MinR-M, MinR-2000), one Fuji (AD-M) and one Konica (CM-H) single emulsion mammographic films were used. For each film type a 21-step sensitometric strip was developed in seven different processing conditions involving the use of four processors, five developing times and four chemistries. The different processing conditions produced a variable effect on the sensitometric characteristics of the mammographic films. While some films seemed relatively insensitive, others were greatly affected. Furthermore, not all the sensitometric parameters of a film were affected in the same way. For example, a change of processing conditions in some cases increased speed and decreased contrast but in some other cases increased both speed and contrast. Different mammographic films present different sensitometric characteristics that can be altered by processing conditions. Thus, in a mammographic facility any change in film processor/processing cycle or chemistry should be carefully investigated before mammograms of patients are acquired. Furthermore, the results of film comparisons under certain processing conditions should not be generalized to other processing conditions.     

Video techniques for on-line portal imaging

The application of on-line portal imaging techniques to the verification of treatment precision is reviewed. The design parameters for a video portal imaging system are described, and the optimization of image quality is discussed with particular emphasis on photon noise. On-line images are presented for a head phantom imaged on a 4 MV linac, and compared with a conventional portal film. The relative advantages of an on-line system are compared with conventional portal film analysis.