Phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian, peritoneal and tubal cancer

OBJECTIVE: Docetaxel and carboplatin are active in relapsed ovarian, peritoneal and tubal cancer. Recently, two prospective-randomized trials showed an advantage of carboplatin combination regimen with paclitaxel or gemcitabine over carboplatinum alone in platinum-sensitive cases. The question on the most effective combination with the best tolerable side effects still needs to be answered. METHODS: Eligible patients had recurrent ovarian, peritoneal or tubal cancer (platinum-free interval >6 months), performance status 0-2 and normal bone marrow, renal and hepatic function. 25 patients (age 18-75 years) were enrolled into this phase II trial. Patients with debulking operation of recurrence were excluded from this study. Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) via 30-min infusion was given on day 1 followed by carboplatin (area under curve [AUC] 5) on day 1. The administration was repeated every 3 weeks over 6 courses. Primary endpoint of this trial was the response rate; secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival and toxicity. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat population, there were 16 (64.0%) complete and 2 (8.0%) partial responses resulting in an overall response rate of 72.0%. Three patients (12.0%) showed a stable disease and other 2 patients (8.0%) a progression of cancer. Two patients (8.0%) were not evaluable for response. Neutropenia was the most frequent G3/G4 hematologic toxicity in 15/25 patients (60.0%); but no neutropenic fever occurred in this trial. Diarrhea G3 was the most frequent G3/G4 non-hematologic toxicity in only 3/25 patients (12.0%). Dose-limiting toxicities were hypersensitivity reaction in one and depressive mood alteration requiring therapy in another case. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin in combination with docetaxel is highly active and well tolerated in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian, peritoneal and tubal cancer. Prospective-randomized trials comparing this with other carboplatin therapeutic doublets in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer are a possible option for the future to answer the question on the best combination regimen.     

An open-label, single-arm Phase II study of intravenous weekly (Days 1 and 8) topotecan in combination with carboplatin (Day 1) every 21 days as second-line therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer

Objective

To evaluate clinical activity of weekly topotecan plus carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal carcinoma.

Methods

An open-label, single-arm, multicenter Phase I/II study. Phase II was the activity assessment phase, with overall response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint. Eligible patients (females aged ≥ 18 years) received study treatment at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) identified in Phase I: intravenous topotecan 2.5 mg/m² (Days 1 and 8), followed by carboplatin AUC 5 (Day 1), every 21 days. A two-stage Green-Dahlberg design was used to assess efficacy of treatment. An ORR of ≤ 30% was required to conclude that treatment was ineffective.

Results

Twenty-two patients in Phase I permitted identification of the MTD. In Phase II, 55 patients (median age 64.0 years) were enrolled and included in the intent-to-treat population. There were six complete responses (10.9%) and 11 partial responses (20.0%), giving an ORR of 30.9% (17 patients; 95% CI: 18.7%, 43.1%). Median time to response and progression-free survival were 6.57 weeks (95% CI: 5.86, 12.57) and 44.29 weeks (95% CI: 36.14, 52.14), respectively. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity caused dose reductions, treatment delays and study discontinuation. Neutropenia (Grade 3: 29%; Grade 4: 11%) was the most common hematological adverse event (AE). Fatigue (71%) and nausea (71%) were the most common drug-related non-hematologic AEs.

Conclusions

This study showed an acceptable benefit-risk profile for topotecan plus carboplatin. Further studies using alternative dose levels could help define an optimal dosing schedule for this treatment combination in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent disease.     

A phase II trial of pemetrexed in combination with carboplatin in patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer

Objective

Carboplatin-based combinations are commonly used in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC). Pemetrexed in combination with carboplatin has been shown to be feasible in a phase I study in PSOC. The primary objective of this subsequent phase II study was to determine the overall response rate (ORR; defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) of this combination in patients with recurrent PSOC. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

Methods

Patients with PSOC (defined by recurrence ≥ 6 months after completion of up to two lines of prior platinum-based therapy), measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, and adequate organ function were eligible. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m² was administered as a 10-minute infusion followed by carboplatin AUC 6 as a 30-minute infusion on day 1 of a 21-day cycle.

Results

Sixty-six patients were treated. Of the 61 patients evaluable for response, there were 20 responders (one complete response and 19 partial responses), for an ORR of 32.8% (95% CI: 21.3%, 46.0%). For the intent-to-treat population (all 66 patients), the median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI: 8.3, 11.1), with 22.7% censoring. Median OS was not reached due to the high censoring rate. There was one drug-related death (multi-organ failure). The most common drug-related grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (39.4%), thrombocytopenia (24.2%), carboplatin hypersensitivity (9.1%), nausea (6.1%), and vomiting (6.1%).

Conclusions

Carboplatin AUC 6 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m² has a low incidence of serious toxicities. Defining the platinum-based combination with the best therapeutic index would require a prospective phase III study.     

Retrospective analysis of weekly topotecan as salvage therapy in relapsed ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: Data were collected by retrospective review of patient records. Eligible patients had received > or =2 prior regimens for ovarian cancer before treatment with weekly topotecan. Efficacy was determined by measurable disease or CA 125 levels. Adverse event and growth factor support data were also collected. RESULTS: Fifty patients (median age, 61 years) were evaluable for safety and received a total of 244 4-week cycles of therapy (median, 3; range, 1-21 cycles). Most patients (84%) had measurable disease, and 30% had performance status of > or =2. Patients had received two to six prior treatments for ovarian cancer. Median weekly dose per patient was topotecan 3.7 mg/m(2). Grade 4 hematologic toxicities (generally manageable) occurred in 4% of patients. One patient had febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were fatigue in two (4%) patients. Forty-two patients were evaluable for response. Of 35 evaluable patients with measurable disease, 11 (31%) had a partial response (median duration, 3 months), and 15 (43%) patients had stable disease (median duration, 3.5 months). Of 41 evaluable patients with elevated CA 125 (median, 154 U/l; range, 47-7200 U/l), 11 (27%) had > or =50% decreases or normalization of CA 125 levels. Median time to progression in all patients with stable disease has not been reached (follow-up range, 1.5-17.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly topotecan is active and well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Prospective studies of this regimen are warranted.     

A phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel and every 3 weeks of carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Paclitaxel administered weekly in equal cumulative doses is associated with less hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity than an every 3-week administration. We studied weekly paclitaxel and 3-week carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma. METHODS: Paclitaxel at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) over 1 h in combination with carboplatin at an AUC of 5 was administered on day 1. Subsequent paclitaxel doses, modified based on the day of treatment ANC, were administered on days 8 and 15. Paclitaxel dose reductions to 75% of prior dose were performed for chemotherapy delays or toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were studied. The median age was 59 (range 42-80). The median platinum-free interval was 12 months (range 7-129 months). A median of six courses (range 1-13) was administered. Paclitaxel dose reductions to 60 mg/m(2) were required in 85% of the patients. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia were seen in 5 and 0 patients, respectively. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia were seen in 14 and 1 patients, respectively. One patient was hospitalized for neutropenic fever. Twenty of 26 (77%) evaluable patients have responded with 15 patients (58%) achieving a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) in combination with carboplatin at an AUC of 5 is well tolerated and active in potentially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma.     

A phase II clinical trial of topotecan and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

A phase II clinical trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topotecan and carboplatin as first-line therapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer was the objective of this study. Patients had histologically confirmed ovarian epithelial cancer with at least one measurable lesion. Patients received topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 3 every 21 days for six cycles. All 42 patients enrolled were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median number of cycles delivered was six. Overall response rate was 71%, with 19 clinical complete responses (45%) and 11 clinical partial responses (26%). Median survival time was 47 months and 5-year survival was 42%. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 100% of patients. However, this toxicity was transient and easily manageable; no patients experienced febrile neutropenia. The combination of topotecan and carboplatin is active in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Delay of therapy by 1 week or topotecan dose reduction to 1.25 mg/m(2) is the first-choice option to reduce topotecan toxicity without affecting the efficacy. Moreover, a chemotherapy regimen using weekly topotecan, which is currently being tested, should be considered.     

A phase II study of gemcitabine,carboplatin and bevacizumab for the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

Purpose

The doublet gemcitabine and carboplatin is effective for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, while multi-agent chemotherapy with bevacizumab may add additional benefit. This phase II study tested the efficacy and safety of a biweekly gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab combination in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or tubal cancer (ROC).

Patients and methods

Eligible patients received concurrent gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², carboplatin area under the curve 3, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 every 28 days for six cycles or up to 24 cycles if clinical benefit occurred. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST, and safety; the secondary end points were objective response rates and overall survival.

Results

Overall, 45 patients were enrolled. The median PFS was 13.3 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 15.3). The objective response rate was 69%. Grade 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (27%) and thrombocytopenia (2%). Grades 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicities included fatigue (18%), pain (9%), and nausea/vomiting (4%). There were 2 episodes of cerebrovascular accidents, 2 noted DVTs, and no episodes of bowel perforation. Median OS was 36.1 months (95% CI, 26.7 to 45.5).

Conclusion

Biweekly gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab were an effective regimen in recurrent ovarian cancer, with comparable toxicity to recently reported day 1 gemcitabine, carboplatin, bevacizumab, and day 8 gemcitabine. Response rate and PFS are improved from reported outcomes of the gemcitabine carboplatin doublet. The degree to which biweekly dosing may present a more rationale schedule for this triplet should be evaluated further.     

A phase II study of two topotecan regimens evaluated in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (GOG 146Q)

Objective.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topotecan in patients with recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinomas.

Methods.

A randomized phase II analysis of platinum-sensitive patients with measurable disease was performed independently assessing intravenous topotecan 1.25 mg/m² daily × 5 every 21 days (regimen I) and topotecan 4.0 mg/m²/day on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (regimen II). All patients were treated until disease progression, unmanageable toxicity, or patient refusal. Insufficient accrual related to regimen I resulted in a redesign of the study as a single arm phase II trial assessing only regimen II. More complete efficacy data is presented for regimen II as enrollment on regimen I was insufficient for some analyses.

Results.

A total of 81 patients were enrolled. One patient was ineligible. Fifteen patients received regimen I, while 65 patients were treated with regimen II. The response rate on regimen I (daily × 5) was 27% (90% CI: 10-51%) and 12% (90% CI: 6-21%) on regimen II (weekly). The median PFS and OS were 4.8 and 27.8 months, respectively, for regimen II. Grade 3/4 neutropenia rate was 93% with daily × 5 dosing and 28% for weekly treatment. Febrile neutropenia was very low in both groups.

Conclusion.

The weekly regimen of topotecan appeared less active but resulted in less toxicity than the daily regimen in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients.     

A phase I study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in relapsed ovarian cancer

This phase I study sought to determine the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of giving carboplatin every 3 weeks and paclitaxel weekly in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Eligible patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer and prior treatment with platinum- and paclitaxel-based therapy were treated with an escalating regimen of carboplatin (day 1) at an area under the curve (AUC) of 4-6 and 1-h infusions of paclitaxel (days 1, 8, and 15) at 50-80 mg/m(2) cycled at 3-week intervals. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the first day of cycles 1 and 2. All patients had a platinum-free interval of greater than 6 months from the most recent platinum treatment. A total of 77 cycles were administered to 16 patients, with a similar median number of cycles per patient at each dose level varying from 4.6 to 5.3. Febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities at dose levels 3 and 4 after the third cycle, with no mucositis, nausea, vomiting, or peripheral neuropathy observed greater than grade 2. The maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin was an AUC of 5 and 80 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a marginal statistical difference with regard to reduced systemic paclitaxel concentration after cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P= 0.06). Of nine patients evaluable for a radiographic response, the response rate was 66.6% with a complete response of 33.3%. All five patients with nonmeasurable disease achieved a biochemical response. The combination of carboplatin given every 3 weeks at an AUC of 5 and 1-h weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2) is a feasible and reasonably well-tolerated regimen and may have significant antitumor activity in relapsed ovarian cancer patients.     

Phase II trial of lapatinib and topotecan (LapTop) in patients with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma

Objective

Resistance to chemotherapy is a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian/peritoneal cancer. One purported mechanism of topotecan resistance is the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein (Pgp). We designed a phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and adverse event profile of concomitant topotecan and lapatinib, a small molecule pan-erbB inhibitor that can block BCRP/Pgp efflux of topotecan.

Methods

Patients with platinum-refractory or resistant epithelial ovarian/peritoneal cancer were treated with topotecan 3.2 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, 8 and 15 and lapatinib 1250 mg PO daily, continuously in 28 day cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate. For correlative studies, archived tissue was assessed for expression of EGFR, HER2, HIF-1α, CD31, and BCRP.

Results

Eighteen patients were enrolled and treated. Four experienced evidence of clinical benefit: one partial response and three with stable disease. Using a two-stage Simon design, the trial was stopped after the first stage due to insufficient activity. Grades 3+ and 4+ adverse events (AE) were experienced in 14 and 4 patients, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 AE were neutropenia (56%), thrombocytopenia (28%), and diarrhea (22%).

Conclusions

The combination of lapatinib plus topotecan for the treatment of platinum refractory/resistant epithelial ovarian cancer lacks sufficient activity to warrant further investigation. In particular, hematologic adverse events were substantial. Expression of correlative study markers did not reveal patterns of predicted benefit or toxicity. Disruption of erbB signaling and BCRP/Pgp efflux with lapatinib was insufficient for overcoming topotecan resistance, suggesting alternative mechanisms of resistance are involved.     

A phase II clinical trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin plus bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), carboplatin, plus bevacizumab in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

Methods

Patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent disease received PLD 30 mg/m² and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 on Day 1 plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on Days 1 and 15 of every 28-day cycle, for a maximum of 10 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) [complete + partial response]; additional endpoints were safety, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to progression (TTP).

Results

Of the 54 patients enrolled, 15 (27.8%) completed the study treatment as planned. Intent-to-treat (all enrolled patients) ORR was 72.2% (95% CI: 58.4, 83.5). Median duration of response was 11.9 months (95% CI: 9.3, not estimable) and median TTP was 13.9 months (95% CI: 11.4, 16.0). PFS was virtually the same as TTP. Three (5.6%) patients discontinued therapy due to disease progression, and another 3 (5.6 %) patients discontinued therapy due to serious adverse events (Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, Grade 3 small/large intestinal obstruction/small intestinal perforation, and Grade 3 abdominal abscess). Fifty (92.6%) patients had ≥ 1 adverse event of interest, most commonly neutropenia (42.6%), hypertension (37.0%), stomatitis (37.0%), proteinuria (37.0%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (27.8%). No appreciable decreases in left-ventricular ejection fraction were observed.

Conclusion

Most patients responded to PLD, carboplatin, and bevacizumab combination therapy. The safety profile was consistent with the known toxicities of these agents. These findings present a potential treatment option for women with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.     

Phase II evaluation of topotecan and navelbine in patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and toxicity profile in patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer treated with topotecan at 2.5 mg/m² days 1 and 8 plus vinorelbine at 25 mg/m² days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks.Materials and methodsEligibility criteria included patients with recurrent primary peritoneal or epithelial ovarian cancer with either platinum-resistant or platinum-sensitive disease. Patients were required to have a performance status of ≤ 2 and normal hepatic and renal function. Response to therapy and toxicity were assessed using standard criteria. Chi square and Student's t-tests were used as appropriate. Survival was assessed with Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsAll 40 patients enrolled were assessable for response. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range 30–82). Median treatment-free interval was 4.0 months. A total of 216 cycles of chemotherapy were administered with a median of 5.0 cycles per patient. Overall median TTP with this treatment regimen was 19 weeks (range 2–136 weeks). The response rate was 30% overall, and the response for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients was 44% (95% CI:22–69%) and 18% (95% CI:5–40%) respectively. Median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (range 1–9 months). Median overall survival was 16.4 months (range 1.5–51.7 months). Assessment of toxicity by patient showed 58% demonstrating grade 3/4 neutropenia with the vast majority being uncomplicated. No severe non-hematological toxicity was observed.ConclusionAdministration of topotecan and navelbine is feasible with demonstrable activity and tolerable toxicity. This regimen may be considered especially in platinum-sensitive patients if a non-platinum based doublet is desired.     

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel for patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who have previously received paclitaxel--ANZGOG 02-01

OBJECTIVE: To determine the response rate of weekly docetaxel in women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with paclitaxel and at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In this multi-center phase II trial, 37 patients with relapsed disease were enrolled and treated with weekly docetaxel at 35 mg/m for 5 out of 6 consecutive weeks. Two patient cohorts were considered, those who progressed or relapsed within 4 months (N=7) or at greater than 4 months (N=30) from the time of completing their last course of paclitaxel. RESULTS: Patients in both cohorts received a median of 2 cycles of treatment (range; 1-4). In evaluable patients, the combined overall response rate, using both CA125 and RECIST response criteria was 18.9% (7/37; 95% CI; 10-34%). The combined overall progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI; 2.5-3.8), and the combined overall survival was 12.3 months (95% CI; 8.2-16.4). Treatment was generally well tolerated with the only grade 4 toxicity being skin toxicity (3%). The most common grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (14%) and watery eyes (8%) with grade 3 neutropenia observed in only 5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Weekly docetaxel is well tolerated and has activity in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum and paclitaxel.     

A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intraperitoneal carboplatin and intravenous paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Objective

This study aimed to determine the first-cycle maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intraperitoneal carboplatin in combination with intravenous paclitaxel and then assess the feasibility of this dose over multiple cycles.

Methods

Beginning at an intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin dose area under the curve (AUC) of 5 and a fixed intravenous dose of 175 mg/m² paclitaxel, patients were entered on a dose-escalating phase evaluating first-cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After estimating the MTD, cohorts of 20 patients were then entered in an expanded phase to evaluate DLT over four cycles.

Results

Twenty-one patients were entered on the dose-escalating phase. A first-cycle MTD of carboplatin at AUC 8 was tolerated although thrombocytopenia was dose-limiting over multiple cycles. An additional 69 patients were treated in expanded cohorts. Only 5/90 (5.6%) patients discontinued treatment because of a port problem. Four-cycle DLT required de-escalation to a carboplatin AUC of 6, and even at that dose, there were 14 dose-limiting toxic effects in 40 patients (35%). Seven dose-limiting toxicities were due to neutropenia, and 6 were due to grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Six cycles of therapy were completed in 75% of eligible patients, but dose adjustments were required.

Conclusions

The first-cycle MTD did not predict the tolerability of this regimen over multiple cycles. Using an IP carboplatin dose of AUC 6 in combination with paclitaxel, the regimen can be administered with a high completion rate over multiple cycles. Because neutropenia is a frequent DLT, the addition of hematopoietic growth factors may permit a high completion rate while maintaining this dose.     

Novel treatment options in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: A review

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of death due to gynecologic malignancy. The majority of advanced stage EOC patients, even those who respond well to frontline therapy, will ultimately recur and succumb to their disease. In platinum-sensitive EOC patients, or those who recur ≥6?months from initial diagnosis, treatment of recurrent disease has traditionally consisted of repeat platinum-based chemotherapy. Secondary cytoreduction remains controversial. Due to recent advances in molecularly targeted treatment options, outcomes for advanced stage EOC patients are significantly improving and hold great promise. This review discusses pivotal trials establishing platinum-based combination chemotherapy as the standard of care and addresses the utility of increasing a patient's platinum-free interval. It then discusses the role of anti-angiogenesis therapeutics, specifically bevacizumab, cediranib, and trebananib and their side effects. Lastly, it reviews key trials for the three poly-adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose polymerases (PARP) inhibitors that have been FDA-approved for maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC: olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib. This review concludes with a discussion regarding ongoing and future clinical trials.     

A multi-institutional phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical cancer

Objective

The aim of this prospective trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.

Methods

This was a multicenter phase II trial of 3 weekly paclitaxel 175 mg/m² 3-hour iv day 1 followed by carboplatin AUC5 1-hour iv day 1 for maximum of 6 cycles until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. Eligible patients had squamous or adenocarcinoma of the cervix with measurable stage IVB or recurrent, aged 20-75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, prior platinum-containing regimen 0-1, and no prior taxane. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST.

Results

41 patients were enrolled, of which 39 were evaluable for analysis. 33 patients (84.6%) received prior radiotherapy. The confirmed ORR was 59% (95% CI, 43% to 75%); 5 patients (13%) achieved a complete response and median response duration was 5.2 months. The response rates for patients who had adenocarcinoma (n = 10) and prior platinum-based chemotherapy < 6 months (n = 7) were 40.0% and 0%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 5.3 and 9.6 months, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (79%), anemia (46%), thrombocytopenia (15%), and fatigue (8%). No treatment-related death was seen.

Conclusions

TC seemed to be feasible and effective similar to other cisplatin-based doublets for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. Phase III trial is warranted to establish the clinical benefits of this combination.