A prospective randomized controlled trial of sclerotherapy vs ligation in the prophylactic treatment of high-risk esophageal varices

Background: Endoscopic ligation (EVL) and endoscopic sclerotherapy (EIS) are both effective in the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices, but the efficacy of the two techniques in the prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of first variceal bleeding, the recurrence of varices, and survival after treatment with the two techniques, as compared to a nontreated control group. Methods: A total of 157 patients with liver cirrhosis and advanced esophageal varices with no previous history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding were randomly assigned to either an EIS group (n= 55), an EVL group (n= 52), or a nontreated control group (n= 50). After the eradication of esophageal varices in the EIS and in EVL groups and in all control patients, the endoscopic examination was performed at 3-month intervals. Results: There were no significant differences between EIS and EVL in the eradication rate of esophageal varices (85% in the EIS group versus 81% in the EVL group). The mean number of sessions required to obtain eradication was lower in the EVL group than in the EIS group (4.8 ± 1.8 versus 6.2 ± 2.0; p= 0.0003), but the recurrence of esophageal varices was higher in the EVL group (31% versus 11%; p= 0.01). Total mortality was significantly lower in the EIS patients than in the controls (20% versus 38%; p= 0.04). It was also lower, but not significantly, in the EVL patients than in the controls (23% versus 38%; p= 0.10). A significant decrease in variceal bleeding was observed both in sclerotherapy cases (20%) and controls (54%; p= 0.0005) and in ligation cases and controls (29%; p= 0.01). No significant difference in bleeding episodes was observed between the sclerotherapy and ligation cases (p= 0.29). No serious complications were observed either in the EIS or EVL groups. Conclusions: EIS and EVL are similarly effective in the prevention of first variceal bleeding. The choice between EIS and EVL depends on the skill of the endoscopic unit. For highly experienced surgeons facing no complications, sclerotherapy seems to be preferable; for all others, it is technically easier to perform ligation. Received: 29 June 1998/Accepted: 18 September 1998     

内镜下硬化与套扎治疗食管静脉曲张破裂出血疗效比较

目的：对比内镜下硬化治疗（EIS）、套扎治疗（EVL）及套扎联合硬化治疗（ESL）3种方法对食管静脉曲张破裂出血的临床疗效。方法：回顾分析中日友好医院消化内科2001—2005年内镜下治疗肝硬化单纯食管静脉曲张破裂出血149例,其中EIS46例、EVL32例、ESL71例,对3种方法的止血率、静脉曲张消失率及再出血率进行比较。结果：3种治疗方法止血率均在90%以上;静脉曲张消失率分别为EIS80.4%、EVL68.8%、ESL87.3%;2年内再出血率分别为EIS52.2%、EVL59.3%、ESL43.6%,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论：内镜下EIS、EVL及ESL治疗肝硬化食管曲张静脉出血均可达到较好效果,临床实践中可结合患者实际情况综合考虑后选择。     

The Evolving Role of Endoscopic Treatment for Bleeding Esophageal Varices

The treatment of acute and recurrent variceal bleeding is best accomplished by a skilled, knowledgeable, and well-equipped team using a multidisciplinary integrated approach. Optimal management should provide the full spectrum of treatment options including pharmacologic therapy, endoscopic treatment, interventional radiologic procedures, surgical shunts, and liver transplantation. Endoscopic therapy with either band ligation or injection sclerotherapy is an integral component of the management of acute variceal bleeding and of the long-term treatment of patients after a variceal bleed. Variceal eradication with endoscopic ligation requires fewer endoscopic treatment sessions and causes substantially less esophageal complications than does injection sclerotherapy. Although the incidence of early gastrointestinal rebleeding is reduced by endoscopic ligation in most studies, there is no overall survival benefit relative to injection sclerotherapy. Simultaneous combined ligation and sclerotherapy confers no advantage over ligation alone. A sequential staged approach with initial endoscopic ligation followed by sclerotherapy when varices are small may prove to be the optimal method of reducing variceal recurrence. Overall, current data demonstrate clear advantages for using ligation in preference to sclerotherapy. Ligation should therefore be considered the endoscopic treatment of choice in the treatment of esophageal varices.     

Variceal recurrence, rebleeding, and survival after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in 287 alcoholic cirrhotic patients with bleeding esophageal varices

OBJECTIVE: This study tested the validity of the hypothesis that eradication of esophageal varices by repeated injection sclerotherapy would reduce recurrent variceal bleeding and death from bleeding varices in a high-risk cohort of alcoholic patients with cirrhosis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although banding of esophageal varices is now regarded as the most effective method of endoscopic intervention, injection sclerotherapy is still widely used to control acute esophageal variceal bleeding as well as to eradicate varices to prevent recurrent bleeding. This large single-center prospective study provides data on the natural history of alcoholic cirrhotic patients with bleeding varices who underwent injection sclerotherapy. METHODS: Between 1984 and 2001, 287 alcoholic cirrhotic patients (225 men, 62 women; mean age, 51.9 years; range, 24-87 years; Child-Pugh grades A, 39; B, 116; C, 132) underwent a total of 2565 upper gastrointestinal endoscopic sessions, which included 353 emergency and 1015 elective variceal injection treatments. Variceal rebleeding, eradication, recurrence, and survival were recorded. RESULTS: Before eradication of varices was achieved, 104 (36.2%) of the 287 patients had a total of 170 further bleeding episodes after the first endoscopic intervention during the index hospital admission. Rebleeding was markedly reduced after eradication of varices. In 147 (80.7%) of 182 patients who survived more than 3 months, varices were eradicated after a mean of 5 injection sessions and remained eradicated in 69 patients (mean follow-up, 34.6 months; range, 1-174 months). Varices recurred in 78 patients and rebled in 45 of these patients. Median follow-up was 32.3 months (mean, 42.1 months; range, 3-198.9 months). Cumulative overall survival by life-table analysis was 67%, 42%, and 26% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. A total of 201 (70%) patients died during follow-up. Liver failure was the most common cause of death. CONCLUSION: Repeated sclerotherapy eradicates esophageal varices in most alcoholic cirrhotic patients with a reduction in rebleeding. Despite control of variceal bleeding, survival at 5 years was only 26% because of death due to liver failure in most patients.     

Band Ligation or Sclerotherapy as Endoscopic Treatment for Oesophageal Varices in Schistosomotic Patients: Results of a Randomized Study

Endoscopic sclerotherapy and banding ligation are the two preferred methods to treat oesophageal variceal bleeding. There are many reports dealing with such treatment in cirrhotic patients but we do not know how good they are to treat varices secondary to other forms of portal hypertension. Schistosomiais mansoni is the main cause of portal hypertension and oesophageal varices in Brazil. We performed a prospective randomised study to compare: 1) the efficacy of both treatments in eradicating oesophageal varices, and 2) complications secondary to both treatments. Forty patients were divided in two Groups. Both sclerotherapy and banding ligation were performed until variceal eradication. There were no severe complications. Variceal eradication was faster obtained with banding ligation than sclerotherapy although there was no statistical difference (mean number of sessions 3.05 vs 3.72, p=0.053). Benign complications were equally frequent in both Groups, although additional sedation was more common in the sclerotherapy Group. We concluded that both treatments are equally effective in the eradication of oesophageal varices, although banding ligation is better tolerated by the patient and probably faster.     

Endoscopic clipping versus band ligation in the management of bleeding esophageal varices

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of endoscopic clipping in the hemostasis of bleeding esophageal varices and the eventual variceal eradication was compared with that of band ligation. METHODS: Forty patients were enrolled in the study in a prospective manner, 19 of whom received endoscopic clipping (group I) and the remaining (n = 21 patients) received endoscopic band ligation (group II). All patients in this study presented with bleeding from esophageal varices. The patient characteristics (age, sex, Child-Pugh score, variceal grade) were comparable in the two groups. After initial hemostasis, the patients were assigned one of the two forms of endoscopic therapy which was continued in the follow-up sessions until varices were eradicated. Early and late results were compared. RESULTS: Initial hemostasis was achieved in all patients in group I but two patients in group II required clip ligation for initial hemostasis because of the failure in band ligation. Those two were treated with band ligation in the follow-up sessions. A total of 224 clips in 53 treatment sessions and 296 bands in 82 treatment sessions were placed in group I and group II, respectively. The rates of complete variceal eradication were 89% and 76% in group I and group II, respectively (p > 0.05). The median number of required treatment sessions for complete eradication of the varices was significantly lower in group I than group II (3 versus 4, p = 0.013). Three patients from group I (15%) and seven patients from group II (33%) were readmitted for variceal bleeding during the follow-up period (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With the advantages of high initial hemostasis rate, decreased risk of rebleeding, and fewer treatment sessions needed for variceal eradication, endoscopic clipping is as effective as band ligation, or perhaps more effective in the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices.     

Interventional endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding – when, how, and how often

Acute upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is still associated with high mortality. Reducing the rebleeding rate is the major challenge in therapeutic endoscopy. The following article describes the indications, techniques and limitations of endoscopic treatment of upper GI bleeding. Endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic sclerotherapy (EIS), endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), cyanoacrylate obliteration, argon plasma coagulation (APC), and the application of hemoclip are described and compared concerning their efficacy. The pros and cons of "second-look" endoscopy are discussed.     

Endoscopic elastic band ligation for active variceal hemorrhage

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of EVL for treatment of active variceal hemorrhage. Twenty-three consecutive patients with actively bleeding esophageal varices had EVL with a flexible gastroscope. Treatment was measured by initial control of bleeding, incidence of early and late rebleeding, survival, complications, and size of varices at subsequent endoscopy. Repeat EVL was performed as needed for bleeding and at two week intervals until varices were grade I or eradicated. Follow up of survivors ranged from 90 to 400 days (mean 280). Bleeding varices were initially controlled in 22 (95.6%) patients. Nine (39.1%) died, five from hepatic failure with no recurrent bleeding, four from continued (1) or early recurrent (3) hemorrhage. All deaths occurred within 3 to 24 days (mean = 9.4) of initial treatment for active bleeding. Twelve of 14 surviving patients have achieved variceal eradication or reduction in size to grade I or less with a mean of 5.5 repeat EVL sessions (range, 0-10). One refused further treatment; one is lost to follow up. Excluding rebleeding, there were no treatment-related complications in 80 EVL sessions. Active variceal bleeding requiring endoscopic control is associated with substantial mortality, especially in higher risk patients. EVL is effective for initial and long term control of bleeding. EVL appears to be associated with a low incidence of non-bleeding complications.     

不同治疗方式对门静脉高压症患者食管下段腔内外静脉的影响

目的 研究内镜结扎、脾切除加贲门周围血管离断术（断流术）、内镜结扎联合部分脾栓塞、内镜结扎加脾切除加贲门周围血管离断术（联合断流术）对食管下段腔内外静脉的影响。方法 将142例患者根据治疗方法的不同分为4组：内镜结扎组（54例）、断流手术组（23例）、结扎联合部分脾栓塞组（34例）、腔内外联合断流组（31例）。运用微探头超声检查食管下段静脉结构的情况,进行治疗前后对比研究。结果 治疗后内镜结扎组黏膜下曲张静脉消失,食管周围静脉丛仍然存在;结扎联合部分脾栓塞组黏膜下曲张静脉消失,食管周围静脉丛曲张较术前减轻;断流组黏膜下曲张静脉存在,程度较前减轻,食管周围静脉丛消失;腔内外联合断流组食管黏膜下和周围静脉丛均消失。后两组治疗后穿静脉的显示率也显著降低。结论 腔内外联合断流能更有效地闭塞食管下段壁内外静脉,阻断门静脉奇静脉分流,防治食管静脉曲张出血与复发。     

Endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices for prophylaxis of first bleeding in children and adolescents with portal hypertension: preliminary results of a prospective study

Background/purpose

Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is effective in controlling rebleeding from esophageal varices in children, but there is no data on the use of EVL to prevent initial bleeding. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of EVL in preventing the first hemorrhage from esophageal varices in children.

Methods

Thirty-seven children with portal hypertension (22 liver cirrhosis, 15 portal vein thrombosis), aged 4 to 17 years (M = 9.5 ± 4.4 years) were included in the study. The criteria for inclusion were (1) no previous variceal bleeding; (2) the presence of esophageal varices classified grade II or more, and (3) their enlargement by at least I grade after 6 months of observation without endoscopic treatment or appearance of endoscopic signs of high bleeding risk. A Multi-Band Ligator was used, and 2 to 6 bands were fixed under general anesthesia during one procedure depending on the number and size of varices. Follow-up examinations were performed every 3 months, repeating the procedure if necessary. In total, 75 procedures of EVL were performed, from one to 5 in each patient

Results

Four patients underwent liver transplantation before eradication of varices. Two others were excluded from the observation because of lack of compliance to the protocol. Of the remaining 31 patients, eradication of varices was achieved in 28 children (90.3%) after 2.0 EVL sessions performed at 3-month intervals. The average time of follow-up after cessation of treatment is 16 months. No bleeding from varices occurred in any child during or after treatment. There were no differences in results between children with liver cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis. Development of hypertensive gastropathy was observed in 2 children with one episode of bleeding. Recurrence of varices without bleeding occurred in 3 children after 12, 13, and 28 months from eradication.

Conclusions

The study results confirmed that endoscopic variceal ligation is a safe and highly effective procedure in children with portal hypertension, regardless of its etiology. Eradication of esophageal varices was followed by 16 months free of bleeding. Prolonged observation is mandatory to conclude if preventive EVL influences the natural history of disease and diminishes the risk of first bleeding onset.     

Management of Variceal Hemorrhage in Children with Extrahepatic Portal Venous Obstruction-Shunt Surgery Versus Endoscopic Sclerotherapy

Extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) is a common cause of portal hypertention in children. Esophageal variceal hemorrhage is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. For many decades, portal systemic shunts were considered as the most effective treatment of variceal hemorrhage. Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) was first introduced for emergency management of bleeding varices and subsequently as definitive treatment to prevent recurrent hemorrhage. The purpose of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of shunt surgery and endoscopic sclerotherapy for patients with proven esophageal variceal bleeding due to EHPVO. The study was a prospective randomized study of 61 children with bleeding esophageal varices due to EHPVO carried out jointly by the department of General Surgery and Gastroenterology at Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, between March 2001 and September 2003. Thirty patients received surgery and other 31 patients received EIS. Overall incidence of rebleeding was 22.6% in sclerotherapy group and 3.3% in shunt surgery group. Treatment failure occurred in 19.4% patients in sclerotherapy group and 6.7% in shunt surgery group. The rebleeding rate of sclerotherapy is significantly higher than that of shunt surgery. However, the therapy failure rate of sclerotherapy is not significantly different from that of shunt surgery.     

手术、内镜下治疗食管胃底静脉曲张出血的近期和远期疗效观察

目的 比较内镜下食管静脉套扎术（EVL）联合硬化剂注射（EVS）和食管胃底静脉断流术对食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的近期和远期疗效,探讨EVL结合EVS和两种方法单独应用的适应证。方法12例肝硬化门脉高压症患者行食管胃底静脉断流术,术后胃镜观察曲张静脉消失程度及合并出血的情况,其中6例术后做了EVL或EVS;32例行EVL结合EVS;9例单纯行EVS;5例单纯行EVL。所有病例术后随访3年,观察曲张静脉消失和复发程度以及出血情况。结果 食管胃底静脉断流术为急诊止血的可靠方法,但术后仍存在程度不同的曲张静脉,术后3年内再出血发生率高达66.7％（8/12）,术后择期行EVL或EVS,曲张静脉可完全消退。EVL结合EVS曲张静脉完全消退达93.75％（30/32）,总疗程2-3周。内镜下治疗后3年内观察曲张静脉复发率仅为10.53％（4/38）,再出血发生率为6.52％（3/46）。结论EVL结合EVS对食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的近期和远期疗效明显优于手术组。食管胃底静脉断流术后施行EVL和/或EVS可以同时达到降低门脉高压和消除曲张静脉目的。EVL结合EVS明显优于两者单独应用的疗效,同时避免了单纯用EVS容易引起出血的可能性,并且缩短了单纯用EVL的疗程,克服了后期套扎的难度。     

Urgent transjugular retrograde obliteration for prophylaxis of rebleeding from gastric varices in patients with a spontaneous portosplenorenal shunt

BACKGROUND: Bleeding isolated gastric varices with a spontaneous portosplenorenal shunt are difficult to control. The urgent use of transjugular retrograde obliteration (TJO) to prevent early rebleeding and to improve early mortality has not yet been demonstrated. We report our experience with this technique in patients with isolated gastric varices after treatment of acute bleeding. METHODS: We reviewed our experience of 6 patients with isolated gastric varices with a spontaneous portosplenoral shunt treated with TJO after treatment of acute bleeding. We basically applied endoscopic glue embolization using cyanoacrylate monomer for treatment of acute bleeding. TJO was a method using an occlusive balloon catheter to control a spontaneous portosplenorenal shunt flow while injecting sclerosant retrograde into the gastric varices. RESULTS: Treatment of acute bleeding was achieved immediately by endoscopic glue embolization, endoscopic variceal ligation, and ligating the varices with sutures following anterior gastrotomy in 4, 1 and 1 patients, respectively, and then TJO was performed. Permanent hemostasis and variceal eradication was achieved in these 6, and they all survived. They were alive for 6-66 months without gastric variceal recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that urgent TJO is effective in the prophylaxis of early and late rebleeding from isolated gastric varices in patients with a spontaneous portosplenorenal shunt.     

Endoscopic sclerotherapy in the treatment of gastric varices

Of 309 patients with portal hypertension, gastric varices were found in 48 (16 per cent). While the majority (88 per cent) of the patients had gastric varices in association with oesophageal varices, 6 (12 per cent) patients had 'isolated' gastric varices. Gastric varices were seen significantly (P less than 0.01) more often with grade 4 than with grade 3 varices. In 11 (28 per cent) of the 40 patients who completed sclerotherapy for oesophageal varices, gastric varices disappeared concurrently on eradication of oesophageal varices or during the following 6 months. Of the initial five patients with gastric varices who received direct intravariceal injections, four rebled; this technique was therefore replaced by combination (paravariceal + intravariceal) gastric variceal sclerotherapy. Emergency combination sclerotherapy successfully controlled bleeding from gastric varices in six of the eight treated patients. Thirty-two patients entered a programme of elective combination gastric variceal sclerotherapy. Variceal obliteration was achieved in 12 cases (38 per cent) and reduction in size was noted in another 7 patients (22 per cent) after a minimum of four courses. There were 11 (23 per cent) deaths, 8 due to uncontrolled bleeding from gastric varices and 3 due to hepatic coma. The other complications of gastric variceal sclerotherapy were minor and included retrosternal pain, fever and dysphagia. It is concluded that gastric varices often coexist with large oesophageal varices. If they persist for 6 months after eradication of oesophageal varices, a combination of paravariceal and intravariceal sclerotherapy should be attempted for their obliteration.     

Long Term Variceal Sclerotherapy: Is Endoscopic Sclerosis a Unique Therapeutic Approach and a True Alternative to Surgery?

Endoscopic sclerotherapy has been used to control acute variceal haemorrhage which persists despite conservative therapy, prevent recurrent variceal haemorrhage in patients with a history of oesophageal haemorrhage, and to prevent a haemorrhage in patients with oesophageal varices who never bled. In this short paper I will cover our personal experience with more than 2000 patients receiving particularly paravariceal endoscopic sclerotherapy of bleeding esophageal varices, and especially present the results of our prospective and controlled randomized trials (Table 1) and underline the thesis that endoscopic sclerotherapy and surgical procedures for patients with portal hypertension are complementary supporting measures or options.     

The sources of recurrent hemorrhage during long-term sclerotherapy

The sources of recurrent hemorrhage during long-term sclerotherapy undertaken by a single surgeon were studied prospectively in a consecutive series of 53 patients for a period of 2 to 6 years. Recurrent hemorrhage, defined as upper gastrointestinal bleeding requiring transfusion or hospitalization or both, in the course of chronic sclerotherapy was investigated aggressively by means of endoscopy and the findings archived with videotape recording. In 24 patients 51 episodes of recurrent hemorrhage developed in the entire series. On the basis of endoscopic findings and serial comparison of videotape recordings, the most common source of recurrent hemorrhage was the original varices, which accounted for rebleeding in 18 patients. The risk of such bleeding was highest in the first month, diminishing thereafter until total variceal eradication. Rebleeding after eradication of varices was always from sources other than varices, as regenerated vessels were small and infrequent and never the source of bleeding. Continued sclerotherapy ultimately achieved total variceal eradication in 15 of 18 patients with variceal rebleeding. Sclerotherapy alone was successful in eradicating all varices in a total of 38 patients in this series, the mean time required being 13 +/- 4.1 months. Rebleeding from sources not amenable to sclerotherapy was treated with porto-azygos disconnection (6 patients) or distal splenorenal shunts (3 patients). There were 12 deaths: four attributed to hemorrhage (3 after surgery), five from liver failure, and three late deaths from causes not due to liver disease. Recurrent hemorrhage per se during the course of sclerotherapy may not be taken as a sign of treatment failure but must be vigorously investigated, since findings profoundly affect management and outcome.     

近端胃切除术治疗断流术后再次上消化道出血的临床疗效分析

目的探讨近端胃切除术（Phemister术）对门静脉高压症行脾切除加贲门周围血管离断术术后再次出血的临床疗效。方法对我院肝胆外科2009年6月至2014年1月收治的26例断流术后再次上消化道出血的患者行近端胃切除术的临床资料及术后随访资料进行分析。结果26例均取得满意的止血效果,其中5例急诊手术,1例行术中胃镜下食管中上段曲张静脉套扎术（EVL）并空肠造瘘留置肠内营养管。2例术后吻合口出血,经输血、药物止血、抑酸及护胃等治疗止血;1例吻合口瘘,经肠外营养及通畅引流等治愈;5例出现大量腹水,经营养、补充白蛋白、利尿等治疗好转。随访中4例发现食管静脉曲张并行EVL,1例于术后13个月因上消化道出血死亡。结论对于门静脉高压症断流术后再出血患者经药物、内镜或介入（TIPS）等非手术治疗效果不满意者,近端胃切除术治疗效果确切。     

Duodenal varices as a cause of massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Duodenal varices are an uncommon but serious manifestation of portal hypertension. Our management of three patients with massive bleeding due to duodenal varices stimulated a review of this subject. Thirteen cases of this condition were previously reported. Endoscopic examination of the entire duodenal mucosa is essential to document bleeding from duodenal varices. Medical therapies, including vasopressin and endoscopic sclerotherapy, have had limited success in controlling active duodenal variceal bleeding. Duodenal varix suture ligation or resection also resulted in a high rate of rebleeding. End-to-side portocaval shunt was the most effective procedure in stopping acute and subsequent bleeding in patients with duodenal varices. Despite therapy with or without portosystemic shunt, mortality risk is high in Child's class C patients and in patients with emergency duodenal variceal bleeding.     

Assessment of injection sclerotherapy in the management of 152 children with oesophageal varices

A total of 152 consecutive children with oesophageal varices have been endoscopically reviewed since 1979. In all, 108 of these children presented with variceal bleeding which was managed by injection sclerotherapy. Variceal obliteration was achieved in 33 (92 per cent) children with extrahepatic portal hypertension and 54 (75 per cent) with intrahepatic portal hypertension. Prophylactic injection sclerotherapy was used to obliterate large varices in 11 children with no history of haemorrhage. Bleeding episodes occurred in 38 (39 per cent) children before variceal obliteration was complete. However, the mortality rate from variceal bleeding was only 1 per cent. Complications were oesophageal ulceration (29 per cent) and stricture (16 per cent) which both resolved with conservative management. During a mean follow-up period of 2.9 years after sclerotherapy, recurrent oesophageal or gastric varices developed in 12 (12 per cent) cases, with rebleeding in 9 (9 per cent), but all responded successfully to a second course of treatment. These results are superior to contemporary surgical management and injection sclerotherapy should therefore currently be the primary treatment of choice for bleeding oesophageal varices in children.     

Emergency sclerotherapy for control of acute oesophageal variceal bleeding using 3% aqueous phenol: a 15-year experience

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy of emergency endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy (EVS) using 3% aqueous phenol as an initial procedure to control acute oesophageal variceal bleed. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-five consecutive patients presenting with acute variceal bleed were included in the study. Protocol based endoscopic sclerotherapy and management of bleeding oesophageal varices was done. Immediate cessation of bleeding, re-bleeding within the first 72 h, success of first injection, final success of EVS, short-term mortality, influence of aetiology of portal hypertension and severity of liver disease on these results were studied. RESULTS: Immediate cessation of bleeding was obtained in 191 out of 195 patients (97.9%). Twenty-seven (13.8%) patients re-bled within 72 h. On re-injection final success of EVS was 87.2% (170/195 patients). There was no significant difference between final success rate in cirrhotic versus non-cirrhotic patients (103/118 (87.3%) vs. 67/77 (87%)). Success of first sclerotherapy session was significantly higher than that of second sclerotherapy session. Surgical rescue was required in 25 (12.8%) patients. Mortality was 3.6%. Failure of EVS and mortality was significantly higher in Child's C group (P = 0.04, Relative risk = 0.5, confidence interval 0.22-1.16). CONCLUSION: EVS remains an effective and cost effective modality of treatment to control acute variceal bleeding irrespective of aetiology of portal hypertension provided strict protocol based management is followed. With timely surgical rescue for the failures, the overall mortality can be reduced to less than 5%.