Efficacy of risedronate in men with primary and secondary osteoporosis: results of a 1-year study

Osteoporosis is prevalent in men with an estimated one in eight men older than 50 years suffering from osteoporotic fracture, and a higher mortality rate after fracture among men compared with women. There are few approved therapies for osteoporosis in men. This observational study assesses the efficacy and safety of risedronate in the treatment of men with primary and secondary osteoporosis. A single-center, open label, randomized, prospective 1-year study was conducted in men with primary or secondary osteoporosis. Patients were randomized to risedronate (risedronate 5 mg/day plus calcium 1,000 mg/day and vitamin D 800 IU/day) or control groups (alfacalcidol 1 μg/day plus calcium 500 mg/day or vitamin D 1,000 IU/day plus calcium 800 mg/day). Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements, X-rays of the spine, a medical history and physical exam, and patient self-assessments of back pain were performed at baseline and 12 months. Blinded semi-quantitative fracture assessment was conducted by a radiologist. A total of 316 men with osteoporosis were enrolled in the trial (risedronate, n=158; control, n=158). At 1 year lumbar spine BMD increased by 4.7% in the risedronate group versus an increase of 1.0% in the control group (P<0.001). Significant increases in BMD at the total hip and femoral neck were also observed with risedronate compared with the control group. The incidence of new vertebral fracture in the risedronate group was reduced by 60% versus the control group (P=0.028). Daily treatment with risedronate for 12 months significantly increased BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip and significantly reduced the incidence of new vertebral fractures. This is the first prospective, randomized, controlled trial to demonstrate a significant reduction in vertebral fractures in 1 year in men with primary or secondary osteoporosis.     

Assessment of the Relationship Between Age and the Effect of Risedronate Treatment in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Pooled Analysis of Four Studies

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effect of age on the incidence of osteoporosis‐related fractures and of risedronate treatment on fracture risk in different age groups in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. DESIGN: Data from four randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, Phase III studies were pooled and analyzed. PARTICIPANTS: The analysis population (N=3,229) consisted of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis as determined on the basis of prevalent vertebral fractures, low bone mineral density (BMD), or both. INTERVENTION: Patients had received risedronate 5 mg daily or placebo for 1 to 3 years. MEASUREMENTS: The endpoints of interest were the incidence of osteoporosis‐related fractures, clinical fractures, nonvertebral fractures, and morphometric vertebral fractures. The effect of age on fracture risk and treatment benefit was examined using Cox regression models with age and treatment as explanatory variables. The 3‐year fracture risk was estimated for patients in each treatment group at a given age. RESULTS: Irrespective of treatment, fracture risks were greater in older patients (P<.001). On average, for every 1‐year increase in age, a patient's risk for osteoporosis‐related fracture increased 3.6% (95% confidence interval=2.3–5.0%). Irrespective of age, risedronate treatment reduced fracture risk 42%. Risedronate‐treated patients had fracture risks similar to those of placebo‐treated patients 10 to 20 years younger. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with risedronate have a significantly lower fracture risk, similar to that of untreated patients 10 to 20 years younger.     

Treating osteoporosis to prevent fractures: current concepts and future developments

Antiresorptive drugs, such as the bisphosphonates and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab, are currently the most widely used osteoporosis medications. These drugs increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the risk of vertebral (by 40–70%), nonvertebral (by 25–40%) and hip fractures (by 40–53%) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Due to the risk of rare side‐effects, the use of bisphosphonates has been limited to up to 10 years with oral bisphosphonates and 6 years with intravenous zoledronic acid. Despite their well‐proven efficacy and safety, few women at high risk of fracture are started on treatment. Case finding strategies, such as fracture risk‐based screening in primary care using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and Fracture Liaison Services, have proved effective in increasing treatment rates and reducing fracture rates. Recently, anabolic therapy with teriparatide was demonstrated to be superior to the bisphosphonate risedronate in preventing vertebral and clinical fractures in postmenopausal women with vertebral fracture. Treatment with the sclerostin antibody romosozumab increases BMD more profoundly and rapidly than alendronate and is also superior to alendronate in reducing the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. For patients with severe osteoporosis and high fracture risk, bisphosphonates alone are unlikely to be able to provide long‐term protection against fracture and restore BMD. For those patients, sequential treatment, starting with a bone‐building drug (e.g. teriparatide), followed by an antiresorptive, will likely provide better long‐term fracture prevention and should be the golden standard of future osteoporosis treatment.     

The prevalence of vertebral fractures and health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women

Vertebral fractures are the hallmark of osteoporosis, responsible for increased back pain, impairment of mobility and functional limitations. These factors have an impact on patients’ health-related quality of life (QOL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of vertebral fractures in Moroccan postmenopausal women and to assess their QOL, using an Arabic validated version of QUALEFFO. The study recruited 347 postmenopausal women in obvious good health. We excluded women who had used a drug or who had chronic diseases affecting bone metabolism. All patients had density measurements and spinal radiography. Each vertebral body (T4–L5) was graded using the semiquantitative method of Genant. The mean age was 60 years. Forty-six percent of patients had at least one vertebral fracture. The prevalence ranged from 31% in patients 50–55 years to 69% in patients 65 years and older. Patients with vertebral fractures were older (61.6 ± 8 vs 57 ± 7 years, P < 0.001), had more frequent history of nonvertebral fractures, and had spine and hip BMD values significantly lower (P < 0.001) than patients without vertebral fractures. In multivariate analysis, older age and a history of nonvertebral fractures were the two independent clinical factors of vertebral fractures. The number of fractures was a determinant of a low QOL, as indicated by an increased score in physical function, social function, mental function, and general health [for all (P < 0.05)]. Patients with higher grades of vertebral deformities, i.e., more severe fractures, had low QOL in these four domains. Patient with thoracolumbar fractures had a worse general health than patients with thoracic or lumbar fractures. We found a high prevalence of vertebral fractures probably explained by socioeconomic factors in Morocco. QOL, assessed by an osteoporosis-specific instrument, is decreased in postmenopausal women as a function of both the number and the severity of the vertebral fractures. Treating women with prevalent fractures may avoid a further decrease in their quality of life.     

Selective estrogen receptor modulators

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) competitively bind to estrogen receptors to act as agonists or antagonists in certain tissues, distinguishing the various available SERMS. Although tamoxifen, toremifene, and additional new compounds are discussed briefly, raloxifene is the only SERM currently indicated for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women. The effects of raloxifene on vertebral fractures, nonvertebral fractures, and bone mineral density (BMD) have been explored. In the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial, vertebral fractures were significantly reduced in the raloxifene treatment group (relative risk of 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.50–0.70, p<0.01). Raloxifene did not significantly reduce nonvertebral fractures with either 60 or 120 mg/d in the MORE trial. BMD increased by 0.4 to 1.20% at the lumbar spine and the effects have been documented for at least 7 yr in the Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista trial. Fracture prevention is greater than expected based on BMD changes. Adverse effects that should be considered with raloxifene include hot flushes and an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. Raloxifene is a viable option for postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis, particularly in patients at increased risk of invasive breast cancer. Although not yet indicated by the US Food and Drug Administration for breast cancer prevention, clinical trail data is encouraging.     

Alendronate treatment of established primary osteoporosis in men: 3-year results of a prospective,comparative, two-arm study

Our trial was a 3-year, open-label, prospective, comparative, clinical study comparing the effects of oral alendronate (ALN), 10 mg daily, and alfacalcidol (AC), 1 g daily, on bone mineral density (BMD), fracture events, height, back pain, safety and tolerability in 134 men with established primary osteoporosis. All men received 500 mg calcium daily. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Spine radiographs were obtained at baseline and every 12 months thereafter, and were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to treatment assignment. At 3 years, AC-treated patients showed a significant mean increase of 3.5% in lumbar spine BMD, compared with a mean increase of 11.5% in men receiving ALN (p<0.0001 between groups). The corresponding increases in femoral neck BMD were 2.3% and 5.8% for the AC and ALN groups, respectively (p=0.0015 between groups). Over 3 years, new vertebral fractures occurred in 24.2% of the AC-treated patients and in 10.3% of the ALN-treated patients (p=0.040). ALN-treated patients also had a significantly lower height loss. There were no between-group differences regarding nonvertebral fractures or changes in back pain. Both therapies were well tolerated, with a compliance rate >90%. We conclude that although AC has significant effects on BMD, ALN has greater effects on BMD and fracture efficacy.     

Risk factors of vertebral fractures in women with systemic lupus erythematosus

The aim of the current study was to analyze the role of traditional and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-related risk factors in the development of vertebral fractures. A cross-sectional study was performed in women with SLE attending a single center. A vertebral fracture was defined as a reduction of at least 20% of vertebral body height. Two hundred ten patients were studied, with median age of 43 years and median disease duration of 72 months. Osteopenia was present in 50.3% of patients and osteoporosis in 17.4%. At least one vertebral fracture was detected in 26.1%. Patients with vertebral fractures had a higher mean age (50 ± 14 vs. 41 ± 13.2 years, p = 0.001), disease damage (57.1% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.001), lower bone mineral density (BMD) at the total hip (0.902 ± 0.160 vs. 982 ± 0.137 g/cm², p = 0.002), and postmenopausal status (61.9% vs. 45.3%, p = 0.048). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that only age (p = 0.001) and low BMD at the total hip (p = 0.007) remained as significant factors for the presence of vertebral fracture. The high prevalence of vertebral fractures in the relatively young population implies that more attention must be paid to detect and treat vertebral fractures.     

Bisphosphonate treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates represent the agents of choice for most patients with osteoporosis. They are the best studied of all agents for the prevention of bone loss and reduction in fractures. They increase BMD, primarily at the lumbar spine, but also at the proximal femur. In patients who have established osteoporosis, bisphosphonates reduce the risk of vertebral fractures, and are the only agents in prospective trials to reduce the risk of hip fractures and other nonvertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates reduce the risk of fracture quickly. The risk of radiographic vertebral deformities is reduced after 1 year of treatment with risedronate [68]. The risk of clinical vertebral fractures is reduced after 1 year of treatment with alendronate [69] and just 6 months' treatment with risedronate [157]. The antifracture effect of risedronate has been shown to continue through 5 years of treatment [158]. Alendronate and risedronate are approved by the FDA for prevention of bone loss in recently menopausal women, for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, and for prevention (risedronate) and treatment (alendronate and risedronate) of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Alendronate is also approved for treatment of osteoporosis in men. Other bisphosphonates (etidronate for oral use, pamidronate and zoledronate for intravenous infusion) are also available and can be used off label for patients who cannot tolerate approved agents. Although bisphosphonates combined with estrogen or raloxifene produce greater gains in bone mass compared with single-agent treatment, the use of two antiresorptive agents in combination cannot be recommended because the benefit on fracture risk has not been demonstrated and because of increased cost and side effects.     

Aging bone and osteoporosis: strategies for preventing fractures in the elderly

As the older population increases, the incidence of osteoporotic fractures is expected to dramatically rise during the next few decades. Older patients are much more susceptible to fracture at any given bone mineral density (BMD) than are younger patients because of various factors, including the quality of aging bone, which involves more than BMD. Suppression of increased bone turnover by antiresorptive therapies, even with only small changes in BMD, can reduce fracture risk, especially in the lumbar spine. Bisphosphonate treatment can significantly reduce vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, including hip fractures, even in the very elderly. Prospective analyses show that risedronate therapy consistently and significantly reduces the risk of new morphometric vertebral fractures after 1 year in postmenopausal women. Post hoc analyses report significant reductions in the risk of 1 new clinical vertebral fracture after 6 months of risedronate therapy and after 1 year of alendronate therapy. Oral raloxifene therapy and salmon calcitonin nasal spray therapy have been shown to reduce the risk of vertebral fracture after 3 and 5 years, respectively, and post hoc data show a significant reduction in clinical vertebral fracture risk at 1 year with raloxifene use. However, neither raloxifene therapy nor calcitonin therapy reduce the risk of nonvertebral and hip fractures at currently approved doses. Bisphosphonates have been shown to be safe and efficacious with 7 years' risedronate sodium and 10 years' alendronate sodium data published, and bisphosphonates reduce bone turnover and increase BMD to a greater degree than raloxifene and calcitonin, which may partly account for their nonvertebral and hip fracture reduction effect. Therefore, bisphosphonate therapy with risedronate or alendronate should be considered in patients with low BMD at the hip and in older patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia, particularly those with an existing fracture.     

Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. III. Meta-analysis of risedronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE: To review the effect of risedronate on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE from 1966 to the end of 2000 and examined citations of relevant articles and the proceedings of international osteoporosis meetings. STUDY SELECTION: We included eight randomized, placebo-controlled trials of postmenopausal women receiving risedronate or placebo with a follow-up of at least one year and providing data on bone density or fracture rate. DATA EXTRACTION: For each trial, two independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and abstracted data. DATA SYNTHESIS: The major methodological limitation of the trials was the loss to follow-up, which was over 20% in most trials and over 35% in the largest study. However, the magnitude of the treatment effect was unrelated to loss to follow-up, and in one of the largest trials, more high-risk patients were lost to follow-up in the control than in the treatment group. The pooled relative risk (RR) for vertebral fractures in women given 2.5 mg or more of risedronate was 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54, 0.77]. The pooled RR of nonvertebral fractures in patients given 2.5 mg or more of risedronate was 0.73 (95% CI 0.61, 0.87). Risedronate produced positive effects on the percentage change in bone density of the lumbar spine, combined forearm, and femoral neck that were generally larger with the 5-mg daily dose than with cyclical administration or the 2.5-mg dose. The pooled estimate of the difference in percentage change between 5 mg risedronate and placebo after the final year of treatment (1.5-3 yr) was 4.54% (95% CI 4.12, 4.97) for the lumbar spine, and 2.75% (95% CI 2.32, 3.17) at the femoral neck. CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate substantially reduces the risk of both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. This fracture reduction is accompanied by an increase in bone density of the lumbar spine and femoral neck in both early postmenopausal women and those with established osteoporosis.     

Effects of calcitriol or calcium on bone mineral density, bone turnover, and fractures in men with primary osteoporosis: a two-year randomized, double blind, double placebo study.

Osteoporosis in men is an emerging public health problem. As calcitriol reduces the rate of vertebral fractures in osteoporotic postmenopausal women, we conducted a prospective study of this treatment in men with primary osteoporosis. Our study was a 2-yr, randomized, double masked, double placebo-controlled trial of calcitriol (0.25 microg twice daily) or calcium (500 mg twice daily) in 41 men with primary osteoporosis and at least 1 baseline fragility fracture. Thirty-three men (85%) completed the study. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Spinal and femoral neck bone mineral densities at 2 yr were unchanged in both groups. Serum osteocalcin decreased in both groups by 30% (P < 0.05), whereas urine N-telopeptide cross-links decreased only in the calcium group by 30% (P < 0.05). After 2 yr, fractional calcium absorption increased by 34% (P < 0.01) in the calcitriol group. Nineteen incident fragility fractures occurred (14 vertebral and 5 nonvertebral) in 7 men. Over 2 yr, the number of men with vertebral fractures (6 vs. 1; P = 0.097) was similar in both groups. In conclusion, the efficacy of calcitriol remains unproven as a single agent for the treatment of osteoporosis in men.     

The role of zoledronic acid in the management of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates are the current standard of care for treatment of osteoporosis. However, oral bisphosphonates are associated with complicated dosing regimens because of poor absorption and have the potential for upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract irritation, resulting in poor adherence and persistence. Zoledronic acid (ZOL) 5 mg, a once-yearly intravenous bisphosphonate, is approved for treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, increasing bone mass in men with osteoporosis, and treatment and prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Because it is administered as an infusion, ZOL ensures adherence and persistence over the entire 12-month dosing interval and bypasses the GI absorption/irritation problems associated with oral bisphosphonates. The objective of this study was to review the safety and efficacy of 5 mg ZOL and its potential for improving patient compliance. Published reports dating back to 2001 were reviewed, with emphasis on osteoporosis treatment. In the HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial, annual infusions of 5 mg ZOL produced significant reductions in risk of morphometric vertebral fractures (70%) and hip fractures (41%) vs placebo over 3 years in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In the HORIZON-Recurrent Fracture Trial, an annual infusion of 5 mg ZOL after repair of a recent low-trauma hip fracture was associated with significant reductions in risk for new clinical fractures (35%) vs placebo. In men with osteoporosis, an annual treatment of ZOL over 2 years increased lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) by 6% compared with baseline. In patients starting or continuing treatment with chronic glucocorticoids, ZOL resulted in significantly greater increases in lumbar spine BMD over 1 year than an oral bisphosphonate. In postmenopausal women with osteopenia, a single infusion of ZOL over a 2-year period produced significantly greater gains in lumbar spine and hip BMD than placebo. ZOL is generally safe and well tolerated. Five milligrams of ZOL has the potential to improve compliance with osteoporosis therapy and, consequently, to reduce fracture risk in clinical practice.     

Comparison of the effect of alendronate on lumbar bone mineral density and bone turnover in men and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of alendronate treatment on lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover in men and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Sixty men with primary or secondary osteoporosis and 318 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were treated with alendronate. The primary end points were lumbar BMD and urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX) and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. The secondary end point was the incidence of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Forty-seven (78.3%) men and 254 (79.9%) women who could complete the 12-month trial were analyzed. The mean ages of men and postmenopausal women were 69.1 and 70.4 years, respectively. Both men and postmenopausal women showed higher levels of urinary NTX as compared with normal range of premenopausal women. Alendronate treatment decreased urinary NTX level by 39.2% in men and 45.4% in postmenopausal women at 3 months and serum ALP level by 17.8 and 21.0%, respectively, at 12 months. Following reduction in bone turnover markers, lumbar BMD increased 5.8 and 7.6% in men and postmenopausal women, respectively, at 12 months. Reduction in urinary NTX level and increase in lumbar BMD were smaller in men than in postmenopausal women. The incidence of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures was 10.6 and 8.5%, respectively, in men and 8.3 and 7.5%, respectively, in postmenopausal women, with no significant difference in these incidences between them. These results suggested that alendronate treatment effectively increased lumbar BMD from baseline in men with primary or secondary osteoporosis following reduction in bone turnover, although its efficacy did not appear to be greater than in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. We have no funding sources; we have no conflict of interest.     

Vertebral fracture assessment in patients presenting with incident nonvertebral fractures

Background Patients with fractures should be prioritized for assessment for osteoporosis so that they can benefit from treatment for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Assessment is seldom offered to patients with vertebral fractures because these fractures are typically not diagnosed. Vertebral fractures can be identified by vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) using current dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of vertebral fractures, using VFA, in patients presenting with nonvertebral fractures and to assess whether this impacts on the management of these patients. Design A cohort study undertaken in 577 patients aged 50 years or over including 455 women, who presented with nonvertebral fractures and who underwent routine post‐fracture assessment by a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS). Measurements The numbers and severity of vertebral fractures were assessed in evaluable vertebrae from TV4 to LV4 in addition to bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. Results Using DXA, 76% of vertebrae could be evaluated by VFA. Of the men and women with nonvertebral fractures, 19–20% had at least one vertebral fracture. The prevalence ranged from 6% in men with humeral fractures to 32% among women with hip fractures. The prevalence of vertebral fractures correlated most strongly with increasing age and with severity of reduction of BMD. Using local treatment protocols, VFA would result in only 3% more patients receiving treatment for fracture secondary prevention. Conclusions In patients with nonvertebral fractures, VFA identifies a substantial burden of prevalent vertebral fractures that have not hitherto been recognized. Nevertheless, VFA seldom influences the need for treatment for fracture secondary prevention after a nonvertebral fracture.     

Efficacy and Safety of a Once‐Yearly Intravenous Zoledronic Acid 5 mg for Fracture Prevention in Elderly Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis Aged 75 and Older

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of once‐yearly intravenous zoledronic acid (ZOL) 5 mg in reducing risk of clinical vertebral, nonvertebral, and any clinical fractures in elderly osteoporotic postmenopausal women. DESIGN: A post hoc subgroup analysis of pooled data from the Health Outcome and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid One Yearly (HORIZON) Pivotal Fracture Trial and the HORIZON Recurrent Fracture Trial. SETTING: Multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women (aged ≥75) with documented osteoporosis (T‐score ≤?2.5 at femoral neck or ≥1 prevalent vertebral or hip fracture) or a recent hip fracture. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of ZOL 5 mg (n=1,961) or placebo (n=1,926) at baseline and 12 and 24 months. MEASUREMENTS: Primary endpoints were incidence of clinical vertebral and nonvertebral and any clinical fracture after treatment. RESULTS: At 3 years, incidence of any clinical, clinical vertebral, and nonvertebral fracture were significantly lower in the ZOL group than in the placebo group (10.8% vs 16.6%, 1.1% vs 3.7%, and 9.9% vs 13.7%, respectively) (hazard ratio (HR)=0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.54–0.78, P<.001; HR=0.34, 95% CI=0.21–0.55, P<.001; and HR=0.73, 95% CI=0.60–0.90, P=.002, respectively). The incidence of hip fracture was lower with ZOL but did not reach statistical significance. The incidence rate of postdose adverse events were higher with ZOL, although the rate of serious adverse events and deaths was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Once‐yearly intravenous ZOL 5 mg was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of new clinical fractures (vertebral and nonvertebral) in elderly postmenopausal women with osteroporosis.     

The use of teriparatide and PTH(1–84) for the treatment of osteoporosis

Different therapeutic formulations of parathyroid hormone (PTH) have been studied for the treatment of osteoporosis: synthetic teriparatide [hPTH(1–34)], reconstituted from lysophilized powder; recombinant human teriparatide [rhPTH(1–34)], which has been commercially available since 2002; and PTH(1–84), which is under review by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Teriparatide has demonstrated vertebral and nonvertebral vertebral antifracture efficacy, increases in BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover, the cornerstones of judging success with an osteoporosis agent. PTH (1–84) may be an alternative consideration for the treatment of both the prevention of the first vertebral fracture as well as the reduction in future vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with existing vertebral fractures. It remains to be seen if there are therapeutic differences between the already approved teriparatide and yet-to-be-approved PTH(1–84).     

Alfacalcidol in men with osteoporosis: a prospective, observational, 2-year trial on 214 patients

Due to pleiotropic-synergistic actions on bone, muscle, gut, brain and different other non-skeletal tissues, alfacalcidol is an interesting drug for treating osteoporosis. In studies on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, men have always been treated with calcitriol or this active D-hormone prodrug, but there is no study of male patients only in the literature. The AIM-Trial (Alfacalcidol In Men) is an extension of the control group (n = 158) of our former risedronate study in male osteoporosis (Ringe et al. in Rheumatol Int 29:311–315, 2009). In that study, we treated daily those controls with prevalent vertebral fractures with 1 μg alfacalcidol + 500 mg calcium (group A) and those without prevalent vertebral fractures with 1,000 IU plain vitamin D (Vit. D) + 1,000 mg calcium (group B). Subsequently, we added an additional 56 pairs of patients to these two groups: 28 with and 28 without prevalent vertebral fractures, reaching a total of 214 cases. That means with this design, we are comparing two groups with a different risk at onset. Due to the prevalent vertebral fractures and lower average bone mineral density (BMD) values, there was a higher risk of incident fractures in group A. After 2 years, we found significantly higher increases in lumbar spine BMD (+3.2 vs. +0.8 %) and total hip BMD (+1.9 vs. ?0.9 %) in group A and B, respectively. Eighteen incident falls were recorded in the alfacalcidol group and 38 in the group treated with Vit. D (p = 0.041). There were significantly lower rates of patients with new vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in group A than in group B. Back pain was significantly reduced only with alfacalcidol. Concerning the incidence of new non-vertebral fractures, we found that there was a relation to renal function in the two groups. The advantage for alfacalcidol was mainly due to a higher non-vertebral fracture-reducing potency in patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) below 60 ml/min (p = 0.0019). There were no serious adverse events (SAE), and the numbers of mild-to-moderate adverse events (AE) were not different between groups. Despite the higher initial fracture risk in the alfacalcidol group, 2-year treatment with this active D-hormone prodrug showed a higher therapeutic efficacy in terms of BMD, falls and fractures. One important advantage of alfacalcidol may be that it is effective even in patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency.     

Risedronate Once A Week

Risedronate (risedronic acid), an orally administered pyridinyl bisphosphonate, inhibits osteoclast-mediated resorption of bone and modulates bone metabolism in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The long terminal exponential half-life of risedronate (480 hours) has led to the development of a 35mg tablet for once-a-week administration. The beneficial effects of risedronate 35mg once a week on total hip, femoral neck and trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) at 12 months were similar to those of risedronate 5mg once daily. Risedronate 35mg once a week was as effective as risedronate 5mg once daily in improving lumbar spine BMD in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of 1456 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Mean percentage increases in BMD from baseline at 12 months were 3.94% and 4.25% in the 35mg and 50mg once-a-week dose groups, compared with 4% in the 5mg once-daily dose group. The differences between the once-a-week doses and the once-daily dose met the predetermined criterion for non-inferiority. An historical analysis suggested that risedronate 35mg once a week reduced the incidence of vertebral fracture significantly more than placebo. The tolerability profile (including the incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events) of risedronate 35mg once a week in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, was similar to that of risedronate 5mg once daily.     

Men suffer vertebral fractures with similar spinal T-scores to women

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the applicability of the WHO densitometric criteria for the diagnosis of spinal osteoporosis in men and to compare it with women with vertebral fractures, as well as to analyze the role of vertebral dimensions in the development of spinal fractures. METHODS: For these purposes we analyzed, using DXA, vertebral projected area and lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), as well as T and Z-scores in lumbar spine in a cohort of 66946 individuals; 2556 of these subjects had one or more atraumatic vertebral fracture (396 men and 2160 postmenopausal women). RESULTS: Men and women with fractures showed significantly lower mean BMD, T-score and Z-score values than individuals without fractures while vertebral dimensions were similar in both groups of patients. When comparing men and women with vertebral fractures, the former showed a significantly greater projected area (46.89+/-5.5 vs. 39.13+/-4.6 cm(2) p<0.001) and lumbar BMD (0.991+/- 0.21 vs. 0.938+/- t0.19 g/cm(2) p<0.001). However, the median lumbar T-score values were similar for both sexes (-2.3 in women vs. -2.2 in men; p: NS). In addition, a similar percentage of men and women with vertebral fractures showed T-score values <-2.5 in the lumbar spine (44% vs. 46%, p=NS). CONCLUSION: We conclude that although men with vertebral fractures have greater vertebral dimensions and BMD than women, the lumbar T-scores are similar. Therefore, it seems reasonable to adopt the same T-score values for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in men and women.     

Risedronate therapy prevents corticosteroid-induced bone loss: a twelve-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

OBJECTIVE: Risedronate, a new pyridinyl bisphosphonate, is a potent antiresorptive bone agent. This study examines the safety and efficacy of daily, oral risedronate therapy for the prevention of corticosteroid-induced bone loss. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in 224 men and women who were initiating long-term corticosteroid treatment. Patients received either risedronate (2.5 mg or 5 mg) or placebo daily for 12 months. Each patient also received 500 mg of elemental calcium daily. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD). Secondary measures included proximal femur BMD and incidence of vertebral fractures. RESULTS: After 12 months, the lumbar spine BMD (mean +/- SEM) did not change significantly compared with baseline in the 5-mg (0.6 +/- 0.5%) or the 2.5-mg (-0.1 +/- 0.7%) risedronate groups, while it decreased in the placebo group (-2.8 +/- 0.5%; P < 0.05). The mean differences in BMD between the 5-mg risedronate and the placebo groups were 3.8 +/- 0.8% at the lumbar spine (P < 0.001), 4.1 +/- 1.0% at the femoral neck (P < 0.001), and 4.6 +/- 0.8% at the femoral trochanter (P < 0.001). A trend toward a decrease in the incidence of vertebral fracture was observed in the 5-mg risedronate group compared with the placebo group (5.7% versus 17.3%; P = 0.072). Risedronate was well tolerated, and the incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events was comparable among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Risedronate therapy prevents bone loss in patients initiating long-term corticosteroid treatment.