Does obesity influence the outcome after the operative treatment of ankle fractures?

Many orthopaedic surgeons believe that obese patients have a higher rate of peri-operative complications and a worse functional outcome than non-obese patients. There is, however, inconsistency in the literature supporting this notion. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on injury characteristics, the incidence of complications, and the functional outcome after the operative management of unstable ankle fractures. We retrospectively reviewed 279 patients (99 obese (BMI > or = 30) and 180 non-obese (BMI < 30) patients who underwent surgical fixation of an unstable fracture of the ankle. We found that obese patients had a higher number of medical co-morbidities, and more Orthopaedic Trauma Association type B and C fracture types than non-obese patients. At two years from the time of injury, however, the presence of obesity did not affect the incidence of complications, the time to fracture union or the level of function. These findings suggest that obese patients should be treated in line with standard procedures, keeping in mind any known associated medical co-morbidities.     

Treatment of lateral ankle ligament tears. Operative or conservative?

In lateral ankle ligament tears, the anterior talofibular ligament ruptures most commonly, often in conjunction with the calcaneofibular ligament. The posterior talofibular ligament is rarely affected. Associated injuries at the adjacent ligamentous structures or at the articular cartilage of the ankle commonly occur. The diagnosis is established clinically with the anterolateral drawer sign and an increased lateral talar tilt. Stress radiographs in two planes demonstrate talar tilt and anterior displacement of the talus, in comparison to the unaffected side. Magnetic resonance imaging provides an early diagnosis of concomitant injuries. Simple, acute lateral ankle ligament tears are treated non-operatively. Surgery is indicated in dislocated bone avulsions and in chondral or osteochondral fractures. A recurrent tear in an athletic patient should also be treated operatively. Athletic endeavours, the number of torn ligaments and patient age are no useful indicators for surgical treatment. Conservative treatment consist of oedema therapy, immobilization of the fibular ligaments with as little compromise of ankle joint function as possible, and rehabilitation with muscle strengthening and proprioception training. During surgery, the ligament stumps are reapproximated in anatomic position, reinforced with local tissue if necessary, and the articular surface is examined for concomitant injuries.     

Autologous chondrocyte transplantation in the ankle joint. Rational or irrational?

Ankle sprains are one the most common injuries of the lower limb. Fractures, ligamentous lesions, and cartilaginous damage are often associated. Nevertheless the injury is often misjudged and concomitant chondral lesions are assessed late. In the case of a symptomatic osteocartilaginous lesion of the talus, which can be illustrated by MRI or X-ray, operative intervention is indicated.Methods such as microfracturing, mosaicplasty, and autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) are in clinical use. The latter is well known and being established as the treatment of choice for large cartilage defects in the knee. Due to the good results in the knee and the technological improvements (three-dimensional tissue constructs seeded with autologous chondrocytes) this method is being increasingly applied for cartilage lesions of the talus.In contrast to the mosaicplasty donor site morbidity is low and the size of the defect is not a limiting factor. The current studies about ACT of the talus show a stable repair of the defect with mostly hyaline-like cartilage and high patient satisfaction. Therefore, the procedure can be recommended for lesions>1 cm2. Concomitant treatment of posttraumatic deformities (malalignment), ligamentous instabilities, and especially the reconstruction of bony defects are compulsory.     

Functional outcome 3–6 years after operative treatment of closed Weber B ankle fractures with or without syndesmotic fixation

BackgroundTo compare the long-term functional outcomes of patients surgically treated for Weber B ankle fractures with or without syndesmotic fixation.MethodsIn total, 959 adult patients with previous treatment with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for closed ankle fractures were eligible for inclusion in a cross-sectional postal survey 3–6 years after surgery; 645 had Weber B fractures. The survey assessed functional outcomes with three validated ankle questionnaires.ResultsIn total 365 (57%) patients responded at a median of 4.2 years after the trauma. After adjusting for age, sex, education, smoking status, body mass index, diabetes, physical status before surgery, fracture classification, and duration of surgery, patients with a syndesmotic fixation had no different OMAS score (p = 0.98), LEFS score (p = 0.61), and SEFAS score (p = 0.98) than those without a syndesmotic fixation. Trimalleolar fracture was associated with worse functional outcomes than unimalleolar on two of the scales, the OMAS (p = 0.028) and LEFS (p = 0.046).ConclusionsIn multivariable analysis, patients with a syndesmotic fixation had no worse long-term functional outcomes than those without syndesmotic fixation.     

Surgical versus conservative treatment for ankle fractures in adults – A systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits and harms

IntroductionDespite fractures of the ankle being very common, there is a lack of clarity regarding the relative effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment.The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the clinical effects, benefits, and harms of surgical versus conservative treatment of ankle fractures in adults.MethodsA systematic search strategy was conducted in the databases: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane up until the 16th of August 2017. Eight available randomized controlled trials, regardless of fracture type, reported on patient-reported ankle-specific functional outcome and were included. Analyses were based on random effects models.ResultsThe 8 included studies randomly allocated 1237 patients to either surgical or conservative treatment. Mean age of patients ranged from 38.1 to 71.4 years. Five studies evaluated short-term patient-reported ankle function, with no significant difference between surgery and conservative treatment (SMD = ?0.14, 95%CI = ?0.57 to 0.29, P = 0.51, I² = 84%). Three studies evaluated health-related quality of life, with no significant difference in treatment effect between surgery or conservative treatment (SMD = 0.13, 95%CI = ?0.01 to 0.27, P = 0.06, I² = 0%).ConclusionsThe best available current evidence supports that clinicians can manage ankle fractures by both surgical and conservative means with equal short-term results in selected patient groups with stable and unstable nondisplaced ankle fractures. However, more research is needed including high-quality RCTs investigating the long-term effects. This is especially the case in younger patients, before making significant interpretations about clinical practice.     

The flexible Triac-Brace for conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. An alternative treatment option?

The flexible Triac-Brace was developed to improve cosmetic appearance and wearing comfort. It was evaluated in this study with respect to primary curve correction in idiopathic scoliosis (IS). Twenty patients (15 girls, 5 boys, mean age: 12.5) with a diagnosis of IS were treated with the Triac-Brace. Lumbar curves showed an initial average Cobb angle of 26 degrees (SD = 9 degrees), thoracic curves of 25 degrees (SD = 7 degrees). After 6.2 weeks the primary curve correction was measured (Cobb). Further radiological follow-up was done every 6 months during the average wearing time of 15 months. Cosmesis and wearing comfort were assessed by a valid scoring system (Quality of Life Profile for Spine Deformities). We observed a primary correction of 41% in lumbar curves (n = 12) (significant, t-test), and 10% in thoracic curves (n = 17) (not significant, t-test). An increase in correction over time as reported by Veldhuizen et al was not seen. Curve progression was noted in five patients (average 12 degrees). The scores for cosmesis (4.2/5) and flexibility of the back (4.6/5) were high. Ninety percent of the patients reported a wearing time of 22-23 h. We do not recommend treatment of thoracic or double curves with the Triac-Brace. Larger studies are necessary to assess the effectiveness in lumbar curves. The improved wearing comfort is a potential advantage.     

Is oesophagectomy or conservative treatment for delayed benign oesophageal perforation the better option?

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was, 'Is oesophagectomy or conservative treatment for delayed benign oesophageal perforation the better option?' Seven papers were identified that provided the best evidence to answer the question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these studies were tabulated. A total of 147 patients from the studies had oesophageal perforation, while 86 had oesophagectomies for delayed oesophageal perforation (DOP; defined as a perforation diagnosed after 24?h) and 57 had conservative procedures. The mortality rate ranged from 0 to 18% for patients with oesophagectomies, increasing to 50% with double exclusion and reaching as high as 68% in primary repair. In one report, it was found that conservative procedures inflicted higher morbidity than oesophagectomy, which eliminated the perforation, the source of sepsis and the underlying oesophageal disease; another study came to the same conclusion. One study concurred that oesophageal perforation was a surgical disease and only a few cases qualified for conservative procedures. In a review of 34 patients who had DOP, 19 were treated with conservative procedures and 15 oesophagectomy; the mortality rate for patients treated by conservative procedures was 68%, whereas it was 13.3% for patients treated by oesophagectomy. In another study, among the patients treated with conservative procedures, at least one required an additional operation and about 33.3% of patients who survived had continued difficulty with swallowing. In four of the studies, the authors observed that oesophagectomy for DOP was a better surgical option, which decreased mortality, and one study compared the treatment outcome between conservative procedures and oesophagectomy. The primary end-point in all the studies was elimination of the source of sepsis by extirpating the perforated oesophagus in comparison with conservative procedures. However, the consensus of opinion in all the presented evidence was in support of the theory that oesophagectomy was safer and better than conservative procedures. In conclusion, oesophagectomy for DOP was superior to conservative procedures. The limitation of the present review was the lack of many randomized controlled trials.     

Immediate surgery or conservative treatment for complicated acute appendicitis in children? A meta-analysis

PurposeThis study carried out a meta-analysis to compare immediate surgery (IS) with conservative treatment (CT) of complicated acute appendicitis (CAA) in children.MethodsSystematic literature research was performed for relevant studies published from 1969 to date. Trials of IS compared with CT were included. Outcomes of interest were postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay (LOS).ResultsFifteen trials were studied (1.243 patients). CT achieved better rates of any complication type (odds ratio [OR] 0.22, [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14, 0.38], p = 0.001) and wound infection (OR: 0.40 [95% CI: 0.17, 0.96], p = 0.041). Neither intraabdominal abscess (OR: 1.03 [95% CI: 0.31, 3.37], p = 0.958) nor postoperative ileus (OR: 0.29 [95% CI: 0.06, 1.44], p = 0.130) was affected by the treatment option. The polled difference in LOS showed a trend for shorter LOS in the IS group (standard mean difference [SMD]: 0.25 [95% CI: 0.07, ? 0.43], p = 0.007).ConclusionsIS was associated with shorter LOS, while overall complication rates and wound infection declined significantly with CT. The development of intraabdominal abscess and postoperative ileus was not affected by the treatment of choice. The heterogeneity of most studies depicts the need for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to discover safe management of CAA in children.Level of evidence: IIIType of study: Meta-analysis.     

“High ankle block” for surgery at the ankle joint

BackgroundSurgery around the ankle is increasingly embedded in outpatient treatment concepts. Unfortunately, the classic “ankle block” as a concept of regional anesthesia is inappropriate for surgery around the ankle because the injection sites are too distal to block this specific region.MethodsThe “high ankle block” avoids this disadvantage by dislocating the injection points 15 cm proximal to the malleoli. Three of five peripheral nerves necessary to perform the block can be reached by a circumferential subcutaneous wall. The Posterior Tibial Nerve and the Deep Peroneal Nerve are addressed by an ultrasound guided approach.ResultsThe efficacy of the technique is highlighted by a case series (3 cases) in which the new blockade was used as a stand-alone procedure, i.e. without additional general anesthesia.ConclusionsThe “high ankle block” may serve as an ultrasound guided expansion to the classic techniques, extending the operative spectrum to the ankle region.     

Is there still an indication for operative treatment of femoral neck fractures with a ceramic hemiprosthesis?

From 1985 to 1995, 417 patients with dislocated medial femoral neck fractures (Garden III–IV) were treated with hemiarthroplasty using a Biolox ceramic head. The average patient age at the time of operation was 81.5 years. A total of 140 survivors was available for follow-up examination with a mean prosthesis longevity of 55.8 months. The Harris hip score recorded a mean of 70.6 points. At the time of follow up, 5 patients had severe hip pain, and in 8 the roentgenographic examination revealed protrusio acetabuli. Five of these 8 patients underwent revision surgery for replacement of the cup, leaving the stem in situ. Received: 6 May 1999     

The epidemic of ankle fractures in the elderly – is surgical treatment warranted?

Ankle fractures in the elderly are extremely common (up to 184 fractures per 100,000 persons per year, and of these approximately 20%–30% occur in the elderly). The medical literature contains no research that has investigated ankle fractures in the elderly. A prospective, randomised study was conducted of 84 patients with displaced ankle fractures, who were over the age of 65 years and were assigned to operative or conservative treatment after closed reduction. The results of treatment assessed according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Score showed a mean of 91.37 ± 8.96 in the non-operated group compared with 75.2 ± 14.38 (P = 0.001) in the operated group. The costs of treatment were accordingly higher. These results call for consideration of a non-operative approach to the treatment of well-reduced ankle fractures in the elderly. Increased efforts should be invested in the prevention of these common fractures.

---

---

Received: 29 November 1999     

Two cannulated hip screws for femoral neck fractures: treatment of choice or asking for trouble?

Introduction: Undisplaced intracapsular fractures are predominantly treated with a minimally invasive fixation technique, whereas the standard treatment for displaced intracapsular fractures is still a subject of discussion. The purpose of this study was to identify the determinants influencing the outcome of intracapsular femoral neck fractures, treated with two cannulated hip screws. Patients and methods: From January 1998 through December 2002 data of all consecutive patients with an intracapsular femoral fracture, treated with two cannulated screws, were documented. Consolidation was chosen as the primary endpoint, mortality and a reoperation for replacement of osteosynthesis were defined secondary endpoints. Results: One hundred and twelve patients were included in the study. Fifty six percent of the intracapsular fractures healed within 1 year. Consolidation was accomplished in 95% of the stable fractures. Consolidation rates were negatively influenced by unstable fractures and inadequate anatomical reduction. The position of the screws did not influence consolidation rates. Reintervention rates were related to the number of local complications and the fracture type. Conclusion: In conclusion, the results of this study show that in case of operative treatment, undisplaced femoral neck fractures can be adequately fixated by two cannulated hip screws. Unstable, anatomically reduced femoral neck fracture (Garden III/IV) may be treated with a more stable implant (e.g. DHS) to avoid redisplacement. If adequate reduction cannot be achieved, endoprosthetic replacement is recommended.     

Does hospital structure influence the outcome of operative treatment of femoral neck fractures?

Data on 32 007 patients suffering from a medial fracture of the femoral neck have been collected between 1993 and 1999 in a database for external quality assurance organized by the chamber of physicians in Westfalia-Lippe. A statistical analysis (ANOVA, chi-square-test) has been performed to find out whether factors like specialization, annual volume or level of the hospital (primary, secondary or tertiary hospital) influence the outcome. RESULTS: Patients with higher preoperative risk-factors are treated more often in primary hospitals. These clinics perform conservative treatment significantly more often than tertiary hospitals (6.5 % vs. 3.8 %). Osteosyntheses are performed more often in departments specialized in traumatology (13 %) or tertiary hospitals (16.8 %). Preoperative length of stay was 0.5-0.7 days shorter in these hospitals. There is no significant difference in postoperative complications all together (23.2-25.6 %), but a significantly lower rate in postoperative complications after osteosynthesis performed by departments specialized in traumatology (11.3 % vs. 18.8 %). A volume load of more than 50 cases per year correlates with a significant decline in postoperative complications (22.5 % vs. 28.2 %). Risk adjusted mortality does not show significant differences among the different levels of hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: There are distinct differences regarding the way of treatment and procedural quality, but not concerning the short-term outcome between hospitals of different levels.