Humoral Heart Rejection (Severe Allograft Dysfunction with no Signs of Cellular Rejection or Ischemia): Incidence, Management, and the Value of C4d for Diagnosis

Severe allograft dysfunction after heart transplant (HT), without ischemia or evidence of cellular rejection upon endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), is a rare but potentially fatal condition that suggests humoral rejection (HR). Its incidence, and the methods of choice for its diagnosis and management, remain uncertain. We retrospectively studied 445 HT patients (April 1991-December 2003) to determine incidence of HR diagnosed by clinical and conventional histopathological criteria. We used immunofluorescence (IF) techniques to test archived frozen EMB issue for IgM, IgG, C1q, C3, fibrin and C4d. Twelve patients (2.7%) fulfilled the criteria for HR after a mean time post-HT of 21.3 +/- 24.7 months (range: 2-72 months). Patients were treated with high doses of steroids and plasmapheresis, with successful recovery in 11 cases. IF studies using classical markers were mainly negative for the six patients with enough EMB tissue for testing. All six patients showed positivity for C4d during the HR episode but not before or after. Humoral rejection was observed in less than 3% of HT patients. Plasmapheresis treatment was highly effective. Classical IF tests were not useful for diagnosis, but C4d appears to be useful both for confirmation of diagnosis and for monitoring response to treatment.     

Intragraft FOXP3 mRNA expression reflects antidonor immune reactivity in cardiac allograft patients

BACKGROUND: Regulatory FOXP3+ T cells control immune responses of effector T cells. However, whether these cells regulate antidonor responses in the graft of cardiac allograft patients is unknown. Therefore, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of regulatory and effector T-cell markers during immunological quiescence and acute rejection. METHODS: Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to analyze mRNA expression levels in time-zero specimens (n=24) and endomyocardial biopsies (EMB; n=72) of cardiac allograft patients who remained free from rejection (nonrejectors; n=12) and patients with at least one histologically proven acute rejection episode (rejectors; International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [ISHLT] rejection grade>2; n=12). RESULTS: For all analyzed regulatory and effector T-cell markers, mRNA expression levels were increased in biopsies taken after heart transplantation compared with those in time-zero specimens. Posttransplantation, the FOXP3 mRNA levels were higher in EMB assigned to a higher ISHLT rejection grade than the biopsies with grade 0: the highest mRNA levels were detected in the rejection biopsies (rejection grade>2; P=0.003). In addition, the mRNA levels of CD25, glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor family-related gene, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, interleukin-2, and granzyme B were also significantly higher in rejecting EMB than in nonrejecting EMB (rejection grade相似文献   

Computerized heart allograft-recipient monitoring: a multicenter study

Computerized heart allograft recipient monitoring (CHARM) is a unique concept of patient surveillance after heart transplantation (HTx), based on the evaluation of intramyocardial electrograms (IEGMs) recorded non-invasively with telemetric pacemakers. Previous open, single-center studies had indicated a high correlation between CHARM results and clinical findings. The present study was initiated to assess the suitability of CHARM for monitoring the absence of rejection in a blind, multicenter context. During the HTx procedure, telemetric pacemakers and two epimyocardial leads were implanted in 44 patients at four European HTx centers. IEGMs during pacing were recorded and transferred via the Internet to the CHARM computer center, for automatic data processing and extraction of diagnostically relevant information, i.e., the maximum slew rate of the descending part of the repolarization phase of the ventricular evoked response (VER T-slew). The study period comprised the first 6 months after HTx, during which the transplant centers were blind to the CHARM results. A single threshold diagnosis model was prospectively defined to assess the ability of the VER T-slew to indicate clinically significant rejection, which was defined as an endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) grade greater than or equal to 2, according to the grading system of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All EMB slides from three centers were reviewed blind by the pathologist of the fourth center in order that agreement among the histological diagnoses at the various centers could be assessed. Totals of 839 follow-ups and 366 EMBs were obtained in 44 patients. Thirty-seven patients were alive at the end of the study period. Age at HTx, EMB grade distribution, and rejection prevalence varied significantly between the centers. Review of the EMB results showed considerable differences with respect to classification of significant rejection. Comparison of average VER T-slew values with and without rejection in the 15 patients who exhibited both states revealed significantly lower values under the influence of rejection (97+/-13% vs 79+/-15%, P<0.0001). Twenty out of the 25 cases with significant rejection were correctly identified by VER T-slew values below a threshold of 98% (sensitivity =80%, specificity =50%, negative predictive value =97%, positive predictive value =11%; P<0.0005). Of the EMBs, 48% could have been saved if the diagnosis model had been used to indicate the need for EMB. A high negative predictive value for the detection of cases with significant rejection has been obtained in a prospective, blind, multicenter study. The presented method can, therefore, be used to supplement patient monitoring after HTx non-invasively, in particular to indicate the need for EMBs. In centers with patient management similar to the ones who participated in the study, this may allow a reduction in the number of surveillance EMBs.     

Serum Matrix Metalloprotease-1 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor–A Predict Cardiac Allograft Rejection

Cardiac allograft rejection is currently diagnosed from endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) that are invasive and impractical to repeat. A serological marker could facilitate rejection monitoring and minimize EMB-associated risks. We investigated the relation of serum matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A concentrations to cardiac allograft rejection, using 1176 EMBs and serum samples obtained from 208 recipients. Acute cellular rejection was diagnosed in 186 EMBs. Mean week 1 and week 2 serum MMP-1 concentrations predicted rejection (p = 0.001, AUC = 0.80). At the optimal cut-off level of ≥7.5 ng/mL, MMP-1 predicted rejection with 82% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Initial serum MMP-1 <5.3 ng/mL (lowest quartile) was associated with rejection-free outcome in 80% of patients. Both MMP-1 (p < 0.001, AUC = 0.67–0.75) and VEGF-A (p < 0.01, AUC = 0.62–0.67) predicted rejection on the next EMB, while rejection at EMB was identified only by VEGF-A (p < 0.02, AUC = 0.70–0.77). Patients receiving combined cyclosporine-A and everolimus had the lowest serum MMP-1 concentrations. While serum MMP-1 predicts rejection-free outcome and VEGF-A identifies rejection on EMB, both markers predict rejection in follow-up of cardiac transplant recipients. Combination of serum MMP-1 and VEGF-A concentration may be a noninvasive prognostic marker of cardiac allograft rejection, and could have important implications for choice of surveillance and immunosuppression protocols.     

心脏移植术后自主和起搏心肌内心电图诊断急性排斥反应的可靠性分析

目的 探讨心肌内心电图(IMEG)在诊断心脏移植术后急性排斥反应中的作用,并评估其可靠性.方法 2004年6月至2009年3月,对32例心脏移植受者植入永久性心脏起搏器,分析自主IMEG的QRS波幅(以下简称为"QRS")和心室起搏心电图(VER)的T波后支最大斜率(Tslew)变化在诊断急性排斥反应中的作用;同期进行心内膜心肌活检(EMB),对QRS和Tslew与EMB诊断急性排斥反应进行了对照.结果 共采集IMEG 523例次,同时有自主IMEG、心室起搏VER和EMB数据的41例次,其中病理检查诊断急性排斥反应阳性17例次,阴性24例次;QRS的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)0.7537,敏感度(Se)为88.24%,特异度(Sp)为62.50%,诊断符合率为73.17%;Tslew的AUC为0.9081,Se为94.12%,Sp为87.50%,诊断符合率为90.24%;QRS与Tslew的AUC比较,Tslew优于QRS,差异有统计学意义(x2=4.22,P＜0.05);联合诊断(QRS和Tslew之一阳性诊断为阳性,同时阴性诊断为阴性)AUC为0.7917,Se为100.00%,Sp为58.33%,诊断符合率为75.61%.结论 自主IMEG的QRS、心室起搏VER的Tslew用于诊断心脏移植术后急性排斥反应均是可靠指标,但Tslew优于QRS;联合应用两项指标诊断心脏移植术后急性排斥反应也是可靠指标.     

Heart Retransplantation

Retransplants comprise only a small minority (3-4%) of heart transplants, however outcome following retransplantation is compromised. Risk factors for a poor outcome following retransplantation include retransplantation early (<6 months) after primary transplant, retransplantation for acute rejection or early allograft failure, and retransplantation in an earlier era. The incidence of rejection and infection is similar following primary transplant and retransplantation. The compromised outcomes and risk factors for a poor outcome are similar in adult and pediatric heart retransplantation. However, due to the short half-life of the transplanted heart, it is an expectation that patients transplanted in childhood may require retransplantation. Based on the data available and the opinion of the working group, indications for heart retransplantation are (i) chronic severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy with symptoms of ischemia or heart failure (should be considered) or asymptomatic moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction (may be considered) or (ii) chronic graft dysfunction with symptoms of progressive heart failure in the absence of active rejection. Patients with graft failure due to acute rejection with hemodynamic compromise, especially <6 months post-transplant, are inappropriate candidates for retransplantation. In addition, guidelines established for primary transplant candidacy should be strictly followed.     

Late Failing Heart Allografts: Pathology of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy and Association With Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

In heart transplantation, there is a lack of robust evidence of the specific causes of late allograft failure. We hypothesized that a substantial fraction of failing heart allografts may be associated with antibody‐mediated injury and immune‐mediated coronary arteriosclerosis. We included all patients undergoing a retransplantation for late terminal heart allograft failure in three referral centers. We performed an integrative strategy of heart allograft phenotyping by assessing the heart vascular tree including histopathology and immunohistochemistry together with circulating donor‐specific antibodies. The main analysis included 40 explanted heart allografts patients and 402 endomyocardial biopsies performed before allograft loss. Overall, antibody‐mediated rejection was observed in 19 (47.5%) failing heart allografts including 16 patients (40%) in whom unrecognized previous episodes of subclinical antibody‐mediated rejection occurred 4.5 ± 3.5 years before allograft loss. Explanted allografts with evidence of antibody‐mediated rejection demonstrated higher endothelitis and microvascular inflammation scores (0.89 ± 0.26 and 2.25 ± 0.28, respectively) compared with explanted allografts without antibody‐mediated rejection (0.42 ± 0.11 and 0.36 ± 0.09, p = 0.046 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Antibody‐mediated injury was observed in 62.1% of failing allografts with pure coronary arteriosclerosis and mixed (arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis) pattern, while it was not observed in patients with pure coronary atherosclerosis (p = 0.0076). We demonstrate that antibody‐mediated rejection is operating in a substantial fraction of failing heart allografts and is associated with severe coronary arteriosclerosis. Unrecognized subclinical antibody‐mediated rejection episodes may be observed years before allograft failure.     

Severe cardiac allograft dysfunction without endomyocardial biopsy signs of cellular rejection: incidence and management

Acute dysfunction of cardiac allograft without evidence of cellular rejection is a potentially fatal complication of heart transplantation that suggests a humoral origin. In clinical practice, humoral rejection (HR) is suspected when there is evidence of severe allograft dysfunction but endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) shows no evidence of cellular rejection. Between April 1991 and August 2003, 12 patients (2.74%) among 438 heart transplants displayed this condition. Time post-heart transplant (HT) was 21.3 +/- 24.7 months (range 2 to 72 months). Immunofluorescence studies using classic markers were negative. All patients were treated with methylprednisolone "bolus" and plasmapheresis until clinical recovery, after which their immunosuppressive regimens were modified. Eleven of the 12 patients recovered satisfactory allograft function. In this series the incidence of suspected HR was low. Unlike other studies, we observed HR not only soon but also even years after HT. Plasmapheresis seems to be an effective treatment.     

Ten-year follow-up in patients with combined heart and kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Combined heart and kidney transplantation has been documented, although data regarding immunosuppression, rejection episodes, and graft or patient survival have not been detailed. We evaluated our experience and more than 10-year outcome with patients selected for combined heart and kidney transplantation. METHODS: Eight patients aged 29 to 59 years were selected for combined heart and kidney transplantation. The indications were end-stage heart disease and underlying renal pathology, or secondary renal insufficiency, or renal failure. Six patients were dialysis dependent before transplantation. There were 7 simultaneous procedures and 1 staged procedure. The heart was transplanted first in all cases. All patients were maintained after transplantation on azathioprine (2 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) and whole-blood monoclonal cyclosporine levels at greater than 200 microg/L; prednisone was not decreased to less than 10 mg/d. RESULTS: Seven (87.5%) patients have survived a mean duration of 100.4 months (range, 51-144 months), and each allograft has continued to function. The only death was due to pulmonary emboli and was not related to allograft rejection or failure. Only 4 cardiac and 4 kidney allograft rejections have occurred. Five patients have been free of kidney rejection, 1 patient has been rejection free for more than 8 years, and no patient has had simultaneous rejection. CONCLUSIONS: In select patients, combined heart and kidney transplantation can provide long-term graft function and patient survival. The low rates of rejection support our current approach to immunosuppression. Our experience indicates that end-stage failure of either heart or kidney does not necessarily preclude dual-organ transplantation.     

Heart retransplantation for heart allograft failure in Chinese heart transplant recipients: NTUH experience

We investigated the short- and long-term results after heart retransplantation in terms of different causes of heart allograft failure. We sought to establish the data of heart retransplantation in Chinese compared with Western counterparts due to differences in heart allograft vasculopathy. From March 1995 to May 2005, eight heart transplantation recipients with allograft failure underwent retransplantation. Heart allograft failure was due to coronary vasculopathy (CAV) in six patients (75%) and acute rejection in two patients (25%). The mean interval to retransplantation was 32 to 84 months (mean 54.3 months). There were five patients who survived after heart retransplantation for CAV and no patient survived after an earlier diagnosis of acute rejection. Heart retransplantation is a feasible method with acceptable long-term survival rate for heart allograft failure. After careful pretransplant evaluation, retransplantation is acceptable. The survival after retransplantation for CAV is notably great than that after acute rejection. Heart retransplantation is the only way for patients who have cardiac allograft failure to achieve long-term survival.     

Detection of cardiac allograft rejection by real-time PCR analysis of circulating mononuclear cells

BACKGROUND: Detection of cardiac allograft rejection is based on the histological examination of endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). We have explored the possibility of whether graft rejection could be detected by characteristic gene expression patterns in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of heart-transplant recipients. METHODS: The study included 58 blood samples of 44 patients. On the day of EMB, mononuclear cells were isolated from peripheral blood, and gene expression was measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Thirty-nine parameters, including cytokine and chemokine genes were analyzed. Gene expression results were correlated with histological assessment of concomitant evaluated EMB according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) nomenclature. RESULTS: Gene expression of perforin, CD95 ligand, granzyme B, RANTES, CXCR3, COX2, ENA 78 and TGF-beta1 was significantly different in PBMC of patients with mild to moderate degrees of allograft rejection (> or =grade 2) compared with patients exhibiting no or minor forms of rejection ( or =grade 2 vs. 相似文献   

Simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation for combined cardiac and renal failure

Simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation (SHKT) is feasible for combined cardiac and renal failure. Herein we reviewed our 10-year experience in SHKT. Six patients underwent SHKT from June 1995 to December 2004. Their ages ranged from 13 to 63 years old with a mean of 45.5 +/- 15.8 years. They were all men except one girl, who was the youngest (aged 13) who suffered from dilated cardiomyopathy with congestive heart failure and chronic renal failure due to systemic lupus erythematosus. Because of aggravating heart failure, she changed from hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis. Because of intractable heart failure, she underwent SHKT from a 24-year-old female donor. All received hemodialysis before SHKT. The indications for heart transplantation included dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 3), ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 1), cardiac allograft vasculopathy (n = 1), and cardiac allograft failure (n = 1). The immunosuppressive protocol and rejection surveillance were these employed for heart transplantation. No operative mortality was noted in this study. The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were the same, 83%. The 10-year survival rate was 55%. No cardiac or renal allograft rejection was noted. No renal allograft loss was noted. There were two late mortalities: the one, who underwent redo heart transplantation for coronary artery vasculopathy died of cardiac allograft failure 1 year after SHKT. The other patient died of massive ischemic necrosis of the intestine at 6 years after SHKT. Our experience showed that SHKT had good short- and long-term results without increasing immunosuppressive doses. End-stage failure of either the heart or the kidney did not preclude heart plus kidney transplantation.     

How many endomyocardial biopsies are necessary in the first year after heart transplantation?

Since 1989, the immunosuppressive regimen used in all heart transplant (HTx) patients at our center has consisted of a combination of cyclosporin, azathioprine, and prednisone. No prophylactic cytolytic agents have been given. One hundred consecutive patients were followed for periods of 4–56 months (mean 27 months). The incidence of rejection was so low in the initial 18 patients that we felt confident about reducing the number of routine endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) that were performed. The mean number of EMBs in this subgroup was 10 (median 11). In the next 20 patients, EMB was performed routinely on only three occasions during the 1st post-transplant year (at 2, 4, and 8 weeks). In the subsequent 62 patients, EMB was performed on post-transplant days 10, 20, 30, and 60. Further EMBs were performed after acute rejection episodes had been treated. No noninvasive methods of diagnosing rejection were employed. In 82 consecutive patients, therefore, the mean number of EMBs within the 1st year was five per patient (median four), with 58% undergoing fewer than five EMBs and 25% requiring more than five EMBs. In the entire group of 100 patients, the mean number of EMBs was 5.9. The incidence of acute rejection requiring increased therapy was 24%. Only 7% required i.v. steroids, two of whom (2%) also required ALG and/or OKT3, with 17% requiring increased oral immunosuppression alone. Actuarial survival was 98% at 30 days, 94% at 1 year, and 92% at 2 years. It is possible that we may have missed acute rejection episodes that resolved spontaneously. However, the excellent mediumterm results would suggest that any such rejection episode did not progress to become hemodynamically significant. It may be, therefore, that when an effective immunosuppressive regimen is utilized, the number of EMBs performed at many centers is excessive.     

Noninvasive assessment of cardiac transplant rejection. A critical look at the approach to acute rejection.

The diagnosis of acute rejection remains a key issue in the management of the heart transplant recipient. Myocardial biopsy for tissue examination is the basic step for screening and diagnosis of acute rejection. Although endomyocardial biopsy is reliable, it is an inefficient approach to screening after transplantation and yielded only a 14% rate of positive results in the author's experience, from 1983 to 1990, of 568 biopsies. A reliable noninvasive method for screening acute rejection is therefore needed. Numerous noninvasive methods have been studied to monitor the systemic immune process against the allograft or to evaluate the effect of rejection on graft function and status. For 13 methods of evaluating immune process against the allograft the sensitivity and specificity ranged from 13% to 95% and 19% to 94% respectively. For nine methods of evaluating allograft function, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 60% to 93% and 65% to 97% respectively. Overall, methods monitoring allograft function and status have better results in predicting acute rejection. Nevertheless, the author estimated that 15 episodes of acute rejection would have been missed by these monitoring methods in his group of patients.     

Protocol endomyocardial biopsy beyond 6 months—It is time to move on

The optimal duration and frequency of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) have been questioned in the current era of heart transplantation (HT), where the advances in immunosuppression and donor selection strategies have led to a decline in acute allograft rejection. We investigated the utility of routine EMB beyond 6 months post-HT. A single-center retrospective review was performed on 2963 EMBs from 220 HT recipients over 10 years. Each EMB was categorized into protocol or symptom-triggered biopsy and reviewed for rejection. Heart transplant recipients with ≥2 known risk factors for rejection were designated as an elevated risk group. The majority of rejections occurred within 3 months following HT. The yield of routine protocol EMBs was significantly lower than symptom-triggered EMBs, not only during the first 6 months post-HT (1.6% vs. 33.3%, P < .0001), but more so during the 6-12 months (0.1% vs 83.0%, P < .0001). A similar pattern was observed in heart transplant recipients at both elevated and standard risk for rejection. In conclusion, EMB was found to be a low-yield screening modality for rejection beyond 6 months post-HT.     

Matching T-Cell Receptors Identified in Renal Biopsies and Urine at the Time of Acute Rejection in Pediatric Renal Transplant Patients

Urinary monitoring of kidney allograft function has been used for many years. More recently, molecular identification of cytotoxic T-cell products has been used as a diagnostic tool in acute rejection. Monitoring of T-cell infiltrates by analysis of the T-cell receptor (TcR) gene usage has been performed on biopsies with acute and chronic rejection, but not on urine samples. The aim of this study was to identify and compare TRBV gene usage assessing the CDR3 (Complementarity Determining Region 3) length distribution and sequence in urine and biopsies of pediatric renal allograft patients at the time of acute rejection and compare them with peripheral blood. We studied four pediatric renal transplant recipients with acute cellular rejection. We identified restricted and matched TRBV CDR3 spectratypes with overexpressed TRBV families and show identical, clonally expanded TRBV CDR3 sequences in all four patients present in the urine and renal allograft. We demonstrate that urinary monitoring can detect graft-infiltrating lymphocytes in acute rejection and may have a role in the monitoring of renal transplants.     

C-reactive protein in the monitoring of acute rejection after heart transplantation

Histological examination of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the main technique for rejection surveillance after heart transplantation. This technique is elaborate, inconvenient for the patient, and not without complications. We prospectively analyzed whether the measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute phase protein that quickly rises when there is inflammation, can serve as a marker for immunological quiescence and as an indicator for withholding EMB. During a 6-month period, CRP was measured in all patients referred for EMB as part of the routine follow-up after heart transplantation. Acute rejection in patients with a follow-up of more than 1 year was rare (1/76). In the majority of cases, EMB was taken within the 1-year post-transplantation (170/246 = 69 %). In 71/170 biopsies (42 %), CRP was ≤ 1; in the other 99/170 (58 %), CRP was ≥ 2. When CRP was ≤ 1, acute rejection was diagnosed in 12/70 cases (17 %). In contrast, acute rejection was found in 28/99 cases (28 %) with CRP ≥ 2 (P = 0.1). Although CRP is elevated more often in the presence of acute rejection, its sensitivity does not allow CRP to replace the routine performance of EMB for monitoring rejection after heart transplantation. We did, however, find a prognostic significance with regard to the effect of rejection treatment: in all acute rejections with a CRP ≤ 3 (n = 11), steroids were effective. Received: 6 January 1998 Received after revision: 7 April 1998 Accepted: 20 April 1998     

Endomyocardial biopsies after heart transplantation. The presence of immunoglobulin/immune complex deposits

A series of 221 endomyocardial biopsies (EMB), taken from 21 patients after heart transplantation, was analyzed for the presence of immunoglobulin/immune complex deposits. Data were correlated with histology (grading following Billingham) and cytoimmunologic monitoring (CIM) on blood samples (grading into negative, rejection, or infection, based on leukocyte morphology and T cell phenotype). IgM deposits and IgG/IgM complexes in blood capillaries around myocyte fibrils were found in 78 and 40 EMB, respectively. This feature was more prevalent in EMB with a histology of rejection (39 out of 52 biopsies).