Simultaneous vaccination for hepatitis A and B

Seronegative volunteers (15) were vaccinated at three 1-month intervals with a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine. The vaccine contained a killed hepatitis A vaccine made from hepatitis A virus (HAV) propagated in diploid human fibroblast cell cultures and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) produced in yeast. After only one injection, all volunteers developed neutralizing antibodies for HAV with antibody titers comparable to those found after gamma globulin administration. Compared with the antibody titers in sera of volunteers vaccinated with HAV vaccine alone, the antibody titers against HAV were significantly higher in the sera of the volunteers simultaneously vaccinated against hepatitis B virus (HBV) after three vaccinations. Of 15 volunteers, 14 seroconverted against HBV after three injections. In 11 volunteers tested 48 weeks after vaccination, antibody titers against HAV and HBV remained high.     

Risks associated with hepatitis A and hepatitis B in patients with hepatitis C.

Individuals with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are at risk for acquiring hepatitis A virus (HAV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) because of shared risk factors. A number of organizations recommend vaccination against HAV and HBV for patients with HCV. The rationale for vaccinating these patients is to prevent hepatic superinfections. Acute HAV superinfection causes more severe disease, acute hepatic failure, and higher fatality rates in patients with underlying chronic liver disease, specifically chronic HBV infection and chronic HCV infection. Available data, although limited, suggest that HBV coinfection with HAV and HCV causes more severe hepatic injury than infection with HAV or HCV alone. At standard doses, hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccines are safe and immunogenic in patients with mild-to-moderate hepatitis C or chronic liver disease. Regardless of disease severity, vaccination should be routinely administered to patients upon diagnosis of HCV infection. Early vaccination is important because response to vaccination is reduced as liver disease progresses. Prevaccination and postvaccination serology testing is recommended in specific populations. A new combination hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccine has been shown to be as safe and effective as monovalent hepatitis A and B vaccines and is currently under review by the United States Food and Drug Administration. A combination vaccine would offer ease of administration and convenience and could increase compliance in patients with hepatitis C or other chronic liver disease: two groups that should be more aggressively targeted by healthcare professionals.     

A virological perspective on the need for vaccination

Superinfecton of chronic carriers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) with hepatitis A virus (HAV) is often associated with more severe liver disease than infection with HAV alone. Superinfection commonly causes markers of HBV and HCV replication to fall to significantly lower levels. The pathogenesis of acute liver damage characteristic of viral hepatitis is thought to be mediated by host cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) directed against virus-infected hepatocytes. It has been proposed that the more aggressive liver disease observed in individuals infected with HAV in addition to chronic HBV/HCV is a result of the induction of interferon (IFN)-alpha during acute HAV infection. This accounts for the antiviral effect on the active markers of HBV/HCV replication, and the enhanced CTL response against HBV/HCV-infected hepatocytes. Alternatively, HAV may indirectly stimulate the T helper 1 (Th1)-type cytokine responses, such as interleukin (IL)-2, IFN-gamma and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, which directly promote the antiviral CTL response. Clearance of HBV infection, and possible HAV and HCV, is associated with a specific CTL response, while viral persistence in chronic HBV and HCV infection has been attributed to an imbalance in the Th1-Th2 arms of the immune response. Vaccination against hepatitis A should be considered for patients with chronic HBV/HCV infection, to minimize the risk of exacerbating underlying liver disease.     

Susceptibility to hepatitis A in patients with chronic liver disease due to hepatitis C virus infection: missed opportunities for vaccination

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) superinfection is associated with a high risk of liver failure and death in patients with underlying chronic liver disease. Although HAV vaccination is recommended for all patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, little is known about adherence to these recommendations in clinical practice. The aims of this study were to determine the frequency of HAV testing and vaccination among patients with chronic HCV infection. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,193 patients diagnosed with chronic HCV infection over a 1-year period. During 1,646 person-years of follow-up, patients were seen by their primary care provider a median of 10.0 times (interquartile range, 4.0-20.0). HAV antibody testing was performed in 640 subjects (53.6%), and 317 (49.5%) of those tested were susceptible (HAV antibody negative). Only 94 of the 1,193 patients (7.9%) received the HAV vaccine, including 26.8% of the 317 susceptible patients, 0.9% of the 323 patients who were already immune to HAV, and 1.1% of the 553 subjects who were never tested. Among the 94 vaccinated patients, 45 received only one dose of the vaccine. Three of the unvaccinated patients developed acute HAV infection during follow-up, and 1 of them died of acute liver failure. In conclusion, despite published recommendations to vaccinate against HAV in patients with chronic HCV infection, we found that HAV testing and vaccination rates were low in clinical practice. Public health programs to increase awareness about HAV vaccination in patients with chronic liver disease are needed.     

Simultaneous acute infections with hepatitis A and hepatitis B viruses in a chimpanzee.

The unexpected occurrence of a hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a chimpanzee experimentally inoculated with hepatitis A virus (HAV) provided an opportunity to examine the course of simultaneous acute infections with both agents. A chimpanzee inoculated intravenously with HAV developed elevated levels of aminotransferases in serum, detectable excretion of hepatitis A antigen in feces, and a marked antibody response to HAV. During the acute phase of this experimentally induced infection with HAV, the chimpanzee simultaneously developed an HBV infection. The latter was characterized by jaundice, a second increase in levels of aminotransferases in serum, and the appearance in serum of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e antigen, antibody to hepatitis B core antigen, and, later, antibody to HBsAg. During the acute phase of both HAV and HBV infections, marked histopathologic inflammatory changes were observed in serial liver biopsy specimens. In this chimpanzee, the concurrent acute infection with both HAV and HBV occurred in association with marked liver damage.     

Response to Hepatitis A and B Vaccine Alone or in Combination in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus and Advanced Fibrosis

Patients with advanced fibrosis are at increased risk of severe outcomes if they develop acute infection with hepatitis A (HAV) or hepatitis B (HBV) viruses. There are no data on the efficacy of combined HAV/HBV vaccination in patients with advanced fibrosis. Our aim was to evaluate the response to the HAV and HBV vaccine alone or in combination for patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) and advanced fibrosis and to evaluate the impact of administering the vaccine while patients were receiving peginterferon for treatment of chronic HCV. In this prospective study of patients with advanced fibrosis (Ishak 3–6), those without serologic evidence of prior exposure were vaccinated with either Havrix^? HAV, Engerix^? HBV, or the TWINRIX^? HAV/HBV combination vaccine as appropriate, and response was defined as the development of anti-HAV or anti-HBV surface antibodies. Of the 162 eligible patients, the prevalence of prior exposure to HAV and HBV was 30 and 18%, respectively. Of the 84 patients vaccinated, 38% received Havrix, 14% Engerix, and 48% TWINRIX^?. The response to the HAV vaccine was 75% in those receiving Havrix^? compared to 78% receiving TWINRIX^?. In contrast, the response to HBV vaccination was 42% in patients receiving Engerix^? compared to 60% in those vaccinated with TWINRIX^? (difference 18.3%; OR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.57–7.79). The presence of diabetes was the only risk factor identified for reduced HBV response (P = 0.01). Responses to both HAV and HBV vaccines when administered alone or in combination were lower than expected in patients with HCV and advanced fibrosis, especially in those with diabetes. The observation that the decline in HBV vaccine response was somewhat lower when this was administered alone as opposed to the combination A/B vaccine suggests that the administration of a combination vaccine may enhance the vaccination response to HBV.     

Is Hepatitis A More Severe in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B and Other Chronic Liver Diseases?

There are several published case series of acute hepatitis A, with coverage ranging from epidemics to case reports, that provide information regarding the clinical course and outcome of hepatitis A in patients with underlying chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (1–12). Only a few reports have addressed the outcome of hepatitis A in patients with other chronic liver diseases (2, 13). Some, but not all, of these reports suggest that hepatitis A superimposed on chronic hepatitis B or other chronic liver diseases is associated with higher peak laboratory abnormalities, more severe disease, including fulminant hepatic failure, and a higher case fatality rate. In addition, analysis of HBsAg titer and serum markers of HBV replication, including HBeAg, HBV DNA, and DNA polymerase, reveals suppression of HBV replication. With the availability of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine in many countries and its imminent approval for use in the United States, the issue of whether or not patients with chronic liver diseases, including chronic HBV infection, should be a target group for vaccination to prevent hepatitis A warrants consideration. The purpose of this review is to analyze the published literature addressing the clinical course and outcome of acute hepatitis A in patients with chronic HBV infection and other chronic liver diseases to determine if hepatitis A is more severe in these patients.     

Consensus statement on the role of hepatitis A vaccination in patients with chronic liver disease

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a ubiquitous, easily transmitted virus that can cause severe hepatitis, particularly in the adult population. Improvements in sanitation and hygiene in the developing world have led to a decline in immunity against HAV. A growing number of adults are now susceptible to infection, with those who have not been vaccinated against hepatitis B virus (HBV) being at risk of dual infection and potentially more severe illness. The symposium, "The role of hepatitis vaccination in patients with chronic liver disease", provided the opportunity to develop a consensus statement. It was concluded that patients with non-viral chronic liver disease (CLD) and certain groups with HBV infection can develop more severe disease in the event of HAV infection. It was identified that patients with CLD should be targeted for hepatitis A vaccination as soon as CLD is diagnosed.     

Hepatitis B vaccine by intradermal route in non responder patients:An update

Vaccination is the main prophylactic measure to reduce the mortality caused by hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection in healthy subjects since the immune response to hepatitis B recombinant vaccination occurs in over 90%of general population.Individuals who develop an antiHBs titer less than 10 mIU/mL after primary vaccination cycle are defined"no responders".Many factors could cause a non response to the HBV vaccination,such as administration of the vaccine in buttocks,impaired vaccine storage conditions,drug abuse,smoking,infections and obesity.Moreover there are some diseases,like chronic kidney disease,human immunodeficiency virus infection,chronic liver disease,celiac disease,thalassaemia,typeⅠdiabetes mellitus,down’s syndrome and other forms of mental retardation that are characterized by a poorer response to HBV vaccination than healthy subjects.To date it is still unclear how to treat this group of patients at high risk of hepatitis B infection.Recent studies seem to indicate that the administration of HBV recombinant vaccine by the intradermal route is very effective and could represent a more useful strategy than intramuscular route.This review focuses on the use of anti hepatitis B vaccine by intradermal route as alternative to conventional intramuscular vaccine in all non responder patients.A comprehensive review of the literature using PubMed database,with appropriate terms,was undertaken for articles in English published since 1983.The literature search was undertaken in September 2013.     

Evidence of protection against clinical and chronic hepatitis B infection 20 years after infant vaccination in a high endemicity region

Summary. Vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) immediately after birth prevents neonatal infection by vertical transmission from HBV carrier mothers. There is an ongoing debate whether infant vaccination is sufficient to protect against infection when exposed to HBV later in life. We studied 222 Thai infants born to HBsAg ?/+ and HBeAg ?/+ mothers who were vaccinated with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine at 0‐1‐2‐12 months of age. A subset of 100 subjects received a booster dose at age 5 years. Blood samples collected yearly for 20 years were examined for anti‐HBs antibodies and serological markers of hepatitis B infection (anti‐HBc, HBsAg, and in selected cases HBeAg, anti‐HBe, HBV DNA). During the 20‐year follow‐up, no subject acquired new chronic HBV infection or clinical hepatitis B disease. During the first decade, possible subclinical breakthrough HBV infection (anti‐HBc seroconversion) was only observed in subjects born to HBsAg +/HBeAg + mothers (6/49 [12.2%]). During the second decade, breakthrough HBV infections were detected in all groups (18/140 [12.8%]). Increases in anti‐HBs concentrations that were unrelated to additional HBV vaccination or infection were detected in approximately 10% of subjects in each decade. Primary infant vaccination with a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine confers long‐term protection against clinical disease and new chronic hepatitis B infection despite confirmed hepatitis B exposure. ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00240500 and NCT00456625)     

Current issues in the management of paediatric viral hepatitis

Viral hepatitis poses important problems for children. In preschoolers, hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection frequently causes acute liver failure. Vaccinating toddlers against HAV in countries with high endemicity is expected to decrease mortality. HAV vaccine demonstrates efficacy (comparable to immunoglobulin) as post‐exposure prophylaxis. A recently developed vaccine against hepatitis E virus (HEV) may benefit fetal health, because pregnant women are most prone to acute liver failure as a result of HEV. Hepatitis B vaccine continues to demonstrate value and versatility for preventing serious liver disease. With chronic infection, undetectable levels of serum HBV DNA complement e‐seroconversion as the preferred outcome measure; suppressed viral load correlates with long‐term complications better than HBeAg status. Among Taiwanese children, low pretreatment HBV DNA (<2 × 10⁸ copies/ml) strongly predicted response to interferon‐α. Future paediatric studies must incorporate HBV DNA levels. The rationale for routine treatment of immunotolerant hepatitis B during childhood remains uncertain. Any treatment of chronic hepatitis B in childhood requires consideration of the risks and benefits. Childhood hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection results mainly from mother‐to‐infant transmission. Babies of HCV‐infected women should be tested for serum HCV RNA at 1 month of age. If negative, confirmatory anti‐HCV antibody testing may be performed between 12 and 15 months of age. Children with chronic hepatitis C may develop progressive fibrosis/cirrhosis, particularly in the setting of obesity and insulin resistance. Treatment of children chronically infected with genotype 2 or 3 is highly successful: combination therapy of pegylated interferon‐α and ribavirin is well tolerated and superior to pegylated interferon‐α alone.     

Virus de l’hépatite B, manifestations extrahépatiques immunologiques et risque de réactivation virale

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is frequent with about 400 million individuals infected worldwide. Extrahepatic manifestations may be observed in up to 20% of patients infected with HBV, in both acute and chronic infections. The best-described manifestations are polyarteritis nodosa and glomerulonephritis. Besides manifestations related to HBV, patients presenting with primary autoimmune disorders and infected with HBV may exhibit reactivation of hepatitis B during immunosuppressive therapy that may be life-threatening. This article focuses on autoimmune manifestations related to HBV and its treatment, and on the risk of reactivation of HBV hepatitis in patients with primary autoimmune disorders treated with immunosuppressive agents.     

Acute hepatitis A and acquired immunity to hepatitis A virus in hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers and in HBV- or hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver diseases in Thailand

A number of studies have suggested that the clinical course of hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection is more severe in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). A study was undertaken to determine the impact of acute HAV in asymptomatic hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers (n = 20) and patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-(n = 8) or hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related (n = 4) CLD. Disease progression was compared with that in 100 patients with isolated HAV infection. No patient with HAV infection alone developed complications, and all recovered fully. Fulminant or submassive hepatitis occurred in 55% of HBsAg carriers and 33% of patients with HBV- or HCV-related CLD. The mortality rate in HBsAg carriers (25%) was not significantly different from that in the patients with CLD (33%). The seroprevalence of anti-HAV immunoglobulin G in 820 individuals was also determined. Approximately 50% of the individuals had acquired HAV infection between the ages of 21 and 30 years. It was demonstrated that HAV infection may have a more severe clinical course in patients with underlying CLD, particularly among older individuals. Vaccination for such patients should be considered.     

Hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency virus co-infection

Hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency virus (HBV and HIV) infection share transmission patterns and risk factors, which explains high prevalence of chronic HBV infection in HIV infected patients. The natural course of HBV disease is altered by the HIV infection with less chance to clear acute HBV infection, faster progression to cirrhosis and higher risk of liver-related death in HIV-HBV co-infected patients than in HBV mono-infected ones. HIV infected patients with chronic hepatitis B should be counseled for liver damage and surveillance of chronic hepatitis B should be performed to screen early hepatocellular carcinoma. Noninvasive tools are now available to evaluate liver fibrosis. Isolated hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBc) are a good predictive marker of occult HBV infection. Still the prevalence and significance of occult HBV infection is controversial, but its screening may be important in the management of antiretroviral therapy. Vaccination against HBV infection is recommended in non-immune HIV patients. The optimal treatment for almost all HIV-HBV co-infected patients should contain tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine and treatment should not be stopped to avoid HBV reactivation. Long term tenofovir therapy may lead to significant decline in hepatitis B surface Antigen. The emergence of resistant HBV strains may compromise the HBV therapy and vaccine therapy.     

Efficacy of hepatitis B vaccination in primary school children from a village endemic for Schistosoma mansoni.

To determine whether chronic Schistosoma mansoni infection interferes with hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunization, 308 schoolchildren aged 6-12 years with no evidence of prior HBV infection (156 with active schistosomiasis) were vaccinated with three 5-micrograms injections of recombinant DNA-derived HBV vaccine. The vaccine was given in the deltoid muscle at time 0 and 1 and 7 months later. All vaccinees were examined 1 and 3 years after vaccination for quantitative antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs). Seroconversion was detected in 284 vaccinated children (92%), of whom 271 had a good (51-300 mIU/mL) or excellent (greater than 300 mIU/mL) anti-HBs response. Sixteen other children (5%) had evidence of natural HBV infection (antibody to hepatitis B core antigen). Of those with good or excellent response, 99% retained high antibody titers for 3 years. Response was not influenced by S. mansoni infection. Hepatomegaly and splenomegaly were associated with reduced vaccine response.     

Suppression of hepatitis B virus replication mediated by hepatitis A-induced cytokine production

BACKGROUND: Acute hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection can cause severe hepatitis especially in patients with underlying chronic liver disease. In patients with pre-existing chronic hepatitis B (HBV) acute HAV infection can suppress HBV replication. The exact mechanism of HBV suppression during acute HAV infection is still a subject of debate. One mechanism may be the production of HAV infection-induced cytokines leading to suppression of HBV replication and viral clearance. AIM: To evaluate cytokine production and HBV-specific lympho-proliferative responses (LPR) during acute HAV infection in a patient with chronic HBV infection-clearing markers of active HBV replication. DESIGN: Early detection of a case of acute HAV infection in an HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA-positive chronic HBV patient treated with lamivudine. RESULTS: At the time of HAV infection a sharp peak in the gamma-interferon (IFN-gamma) level occurred just before the rise in serum transaminase activity. This was subsequently followed by a decrease in HBV DNA and HBeAg below the limit of detection of the assay. However the HBV-specific T-cell response was not modified. After resolution of the acute HAV infection and withdrawal of antiviral therapy HBV replication relapsed. CONCLUSION: The sharp rise in IFN-gamma production mediated by the acute HAV infection may be pivotal in the suppression of HBV replication in chronic hepatitis B.     

Prophylaxis of hepatitis B reactivation with immunosuppressive therapy in rheumatic diseases. Orientations for clinical practice

Reactivation of infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a potentially serious complication of immunosuppression, which can be identified and efficiently prevented. There have been an increasing number of cases of HBV reactivation in patients receiving immunosuppression in the context of rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus. The recommendations in this area should be individualized taking into account two aspects: immunosuppressive regimens used (high or low risk of reactivation) and the different stages of HBV infection: chronic hepatitis B, inactive HBV carrier, occult hepatitis B infection defined by HB surface antigen (HBsAg) negative and antibody anti-HB core (anti-HBc) positive. In patients with rheumatic diseases that will start high-risk immunosuppressive drugs, we propose a universal screening with serological tests for hepatitis B (HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HBc). Patients with chronic hepatitis B (HBsAg positive, HBV DNA ≥ 2000 IU/ml, elevated ALT) should initiate antiviral therapy. Inactive HBV carriers (HBsAg positive, HBV DNA <2000 IU / ml, normal aminotransferases) exposed to high risk immunosuppressive therapy should undergo prophylaxis of HBV reactivation. Prophylaxis should be started 2 to 4 weeks before the beginning of immunosuppressive therapy and maintained for at least 6 to 12 months after its suspension. It is recommended to use entecavir or tenofovir as first line antiviral agents. In inactive HBsAg carriers under low-risk immunosuppressive therapy and patients with HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive (HBV infection in the past), the strategy should be monitoring of viral reactivation with aminotransferases and HBV DNA determination in every 6 months.     

Host genetic factors affecting hepatitis B infection outcomes:Insights from genome-wide association studies

The clinical outcome of hepatitis B virus(HBV) infection depends on the success or failure of the immune responses to HBV,and varies widely among individuals,ranging from asymptomatic self-limited infection,inactive carrier state,chronic hepatitis,cirrhosis,hepatocellular carcinoma,to liver failure,depending on the success or failure of immune response to HBV.Genome-wide association studies(GWAS) identified key genetic factors influencing the pathogenesis of HBV-related traits.In this review,we discuss GWAS for persistence of HBV infection,antibody response to hepatitis B vaccine,and HBV-related advanced liver diseases.HBV persistence is associated with multiple genes with diverse roles in immune mechanisms.The strongest associations are found within the classical human leukocyte antigen(HLA) genes,highlighting the central role of antigen presentation in the immune response to HBV.Associated variants affect both epitope binding specificities and expression levels of HLA molecules.Several other susceptibility genes regulate the magnitude of adaptive immune responses,determining immunity vs tolerance.HBV persistence and nonresponse to vaccine share the same risk variants,implying overlapping genetic bases.On the other hand,the risk variants for HBV-related advanced liver diseases are largely different,suggesting different host-virus dynamics in acute vs chronic HBV infections.The findings of these GWAS are likely to pave the way for developing more effective preventive and therapeutic interventions by personalizing the management of HBV infection.     

Double infections with hepatitis A and B viruses

Ten (2.8%) asymptomatic carriers of HBsAg and four (1.1%) patients with acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection were detected among 356 adults with acute viral hepatitis A (HAV) consecutively admitted to the Athens Hospital for Infectious Diseases from May 1981 to March 1984. These patients did not differ in clinical, epidemiologic (except in age), biochemical or serologic characteristics from patients acutely infected with HAV alone. Transient suppression of the HBV replication and disappearance of the HBV DNA accompanied by seroconversion from HBeAg positive to anti-HBe positive were detected in one and two carriers respectively. The titer of non-class-specific anti-HBc was low (less than or equal to 10(-2)) in all cases. These data suggest that superinfection of HBsAg carriers with HAV does not cause more severe disease or influence adversely the course of chronic hepatitis B disease. However, accurate diagnosis of double infections is necessary for prognosis of the liver disease and appropriate management of the patient's environment. This is quite important in areas with a high prevalence of HBV infections, like Greece, where double infections are relatively common.     

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in association with antineoplastic therapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. HBV reactivation with immunosuppressive treatments is thoroughly described, and is most widely reported in patients who have chronic HBV infection, when hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is positive, in connection with chemotherapy used to treat lymphoma. However, reactivation can also occur in patients who have prior resolved HBV infection, in whom HBsAg is negative but antibody to hepatitis B core antigen is positive. The antiviral drug lamivudine is highly efficacious in preventing HBV reactivation in these circumstances.