首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
后路一期全脊椎截骨术治疗重度僵硬型脊柱侧后凸   总被引:7,自引:1,他引:6  
目的:评价后路一期全脊椎截骨矫形治疗重度僵硬型脊柱侧后凸的安全性及效果。方法:1998年1月 ̄2004年1月,对26例重度僵硬型脊柱侧后凸患者行手术治疗,男10例,女16例,年龄9 ̄37岁,平均17.4岁。其中先天性脊柱侧后凸14例,特发性脊柱侧后凸7例,脊柱侧凸术后翻修5例。术前侧凸Cobb角76° ̄151°,平均98°,后凸92° ̄153°,平均106°,躯干偏移2 ̄7.9cm,平均3.6cm。其中5例存在不同程度的下肢神经症状,18例存在中、重度限制性呼吸功能障碍。所有患者均行后路一期经顶椎全脊椎截骨、经椎弓根固定、植骨融合术。结果:所有患者安全接受手术,手术时间3.5 ̄5.5h,平均4.2h,术中出血量920 ̄2100ml,平均1120ml。术后1周左右戴支具下地,5例术前神经损害者有不同程度的恢复。无神经损伤等严重并发症发生。术后侧凸Cobb角30° ̄79°,平均52.3°,矫正率61.1%;后凸42° ̄86°,平均52.3°,矫正率51.6%;躯干偏移0 ̄1.9cm,平均1.2cm,矫正率71%;身高增长6 ̄11.5cm,平均7.2cm。所有患者随访1年以上(1 ̄5.2年),1例术后9个月发现假关节及固定棒断裂,经过再次手术换棒、植骨后融合。末次随访时96%患者对治疗结果表示满意。结论:后路一期全脊椎截骨术治疗重度僵硬型脊柱侧后凸畸形可安全实施,矫正效果良好。  相似文献   

2.
僵硬性脊柱侧凸前、后路松解效果的比较   总被引:3,自引:2,他引:1  
目的:比较前、后路松解在僵硬性脊柱侧凸分期治疗中的效果,分析前、后路松解的手术适应证。方法:79例僵硬性脊柱侧凸患者(均为先天性或特发性脊柱侧凸患者),分别一期行脊柱前路或后路松解,头颅骨盆环牵引2~5周,平均18d,二期行矫形内固定术。前路松解组40例,其中先天性脊柱侧凸18例,特发性脊柱侧凸22例。后路松解组39例,其中先天性脊柱侧凸19例,特发性脊柱侧凸20例。对两组患者松解术前、术后Cobb角及脊柱畸形改善率、手术时间和手术并发症进行分析比较。结果:前路松解组先天性脊柱侧凸患者的Cobb角由101°矫正至61°,特发性脊柱侧凸由96°矫正至53°;后路组先天性脊柱侧凸由106°矫正至78°,特发性脊柱侧凸由89°矫正至63°,脊柱畸形改善率前路松解优于后路松解(P<0.05)。两组的手术时间、手术并发症均无显著性差异。结论:前路松解的脊柱畸形改善率明显优于后路松解,前路松解更适合于僵硬性脊柱侧凸的一期松解,不适合行前路松解的患者可选择后路松解。  相似文献   

3.
目的 探讨单纯后路松解原位弯棒技术对重度僵硬的非角状脊柱侧凸的治疗效果.方法 采用后路松解、原位弯棒技术治疗包括各种病因导致的重度僵硬的非角状脊柱侧凸畸形14例,依据患者的影像学资料、并发症的发生情况等评估临床效果.结果 脊柱侧凸的主弯平均Cobb角为86.3°(70~97°),柔韧性为21.3%(8%~28%),术后...  相似文献   

4.
牵引结合后路手术治疗重度脊柱侧凸的疗效分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
[目的]探讨Halo-股骨髁上牵引结合后路矫形对柔韧性30%~40%的重度脊柱侧凸患者的疗效.[方法]对2000年1月~2006年6月治疗的41例柔韧性30%~40%重度脊柱侧凸患者,按照是否行牵引治疗分为两组.牵引组A组 22例,主侧凸平均Cobb' s角91.2°;对照组B组 19例,主侧凸平均Cobb' s角87.5°.[结果]两组无严重神经系统并发症.A组平均牵引18 d(14~22 d)后主侧凸平均矫正46%,14例肺功能减退患者均改善.两组均行一期后路松解三维矫形术,术后C7~S1偏移值、顶椎偏移矫正A组优于B组.A组主侧凸平均矫正55.2°,B组45.7°,A组优于B组 (P<0.05). A组平均随访40个月, B组平均随访42个月,末次随访两组平均冠状面矫正丢失分别为3°、2.4°,矢状面无丢失,两组均获骨性融合.[结论]对于柔韧性30%~40%的重度脊柱侧凸,术前Halo-股骨髁上牵引可改善肺功能,结合牵引下后路松解矫形术可以获得更好的畸形矫正和躯干平衡,减少术中术后并发症. )后主侧凸平均矫正46%,14例肺功能减退患者均改善.两组均行一期后路松解三维矫形术,术后C_7~S_1偏移值、顶椎偏 矫正A组优于B组.A组主侧凸平均矫正55.2°,B组45.7°,A组优于B组 (P<0.05). A组平均随访40个月, B组平均随访42个月,末次随访两组平均冠状面矫正丢失分别为3°、2.4°,矢状面无丢失,两组均获骨性融合.[结论]对于柔韧性30%~40%的重度脊柱侧凸,术前Halo-股骨髁上牵引可改善肺功能,结合牵引下后路松解矫形术可以获得更好的畸形矫正和躯干平衡,减少术中术后并发症. )后主侧凸平均矫正46%,14例肺功能减退患者均改善.两组均行一期后路松解三  相似文献   

5.
经后路胸膜外松解脊椎楔形截骨治疗重度特发性脊柱侧凸   总被引:1,自引:5,他引:1  
目的:评价经后路胸膜外松解脊椎楔形截骨治疗重度僵硬性特发性脊柱侧凸的安全性和早期临床效果.方法:2004年5月~2007年10月采用经后路胸膜外松解凸侧胸椎间隙、顶椎区楔形截骨、凹侧肋椎关节松解及椎弓根螺钉同定矫正治疗重度僵硬性特发性脊柱侧凸患者19例,男12例,女7例,年龄14~39岁,平均18.9岁.术前侧凸Cobb角890~132°,平均107°;C7中垂线与骶骨中垂线距离3~5.7cm,平均4.1cm;侧凸柔韧性为16.1%~29.6%,平均24.2%;12例合并后凸畸形,后凸Cobb角56°-89°,平均67°.结果:平均松解椎间隙5.2个,楔形截骨平均2.1个椎体.手术时间平均8.9h,术中出血量1200~4700ml,平均3100ml.无脊髓损伤.1例术中发生血气胸,术毕行胸腔闭式引流,2周后痊愈;1例术后第4d并发肠系膜上动脉综合征,采取禁食水、持续胃肠减压、维持水电解质平衡、左侧卧位,术后2周痊愈.术后侧凸Cobb角矫正至12°~59°,平均24.1°,矫正率为77.5%;12例后凸Cobb角22°~460°,平均35.6°,矫正率为46.9%;C7中垂线与骶骨中垂线距离0.3~1.3cm,平均0.7cm.随访8~41个月,平均17.2个月,末次随访时侧凸Cobb角15°~67°,平均27.9.,丢失3.6%;12例后凸Cobb角25°~51°,平均39.4°,丢失5.7%;C7中垂线与骶骨中垂线距离0.4~1.6cm,平均为0.9cm.所有患者植骨愈合良好,内固定无断裂及松动.结论:经后路胸膜外松解、脊椎楔形截骨与胸廓成形及后路脊柱矫形使用同一个手术切口,创伤小,节省了前路经胸的手术时间,对心肺干扰小,降低了手术风险.应用此方法治疗重度特发性脊柱侧凸安全性好,能获得较好的脊柱三维矫正.  相似文献   

6.
后路椎体截骨矫正僵硬性脊柱侧后凸   总被引:17,自引:3,他引:17  
目的采用顶椎截骨治疗僵硬性脊柱侧后凸,并探讨其适应证。方法僵硬性脊柱侧后凸患者58例,男21例,女37例;年龄4~27岁,平均14.1岁。其中先天性侧凸31例,特发性侧凸26例,神经纤维瘤病1例。既往有脊柱矫正手术史者9例。术前脊柱侧凸Cobb角平均83.7°,悬吊位71.1°,脊柱柔韧度12.4%;脊柱后凸角平均78.2°,悬吊位76.3°,脊柱柔韧度23.8%。伴神经压迫症状者14例,CT或MRI显示椎管内骨性或纤维性分隔6例。全部病例均采用后路顶椎凸侧楔形截骨,截骨平面T8~L1,截骨后应用节段椎弓根螺钉系统或Luque器械固定。结果49例随访5~69个月,平均26.7个月。侧凸Cobb角平均30.0°,矫正率64.2%;后凸角平均21.3°,矫正率63.5%。术前有神经压迫症状者术后3个月恢复正常11例、明显减轻2例,1年后仍无改善1例。术后发生肺炎2例(3.4%),肠系膜上动脉综合征2例(3.4%),一过性单侧或双侧下肢神经功能障碍5例(8.6%)。术后1年以上畸形矫正丢失率平均1.8%。结论对重度先天性混合型侧后凸、青春期后的中重度特发性僵硬性侧后凸和手术后畸形加重的脊柱侧后凸患者,采用顶椎楔形截骨,可使畸形得到一次性矫正,降低了神经、血管损伤的发生率。通过节段椎弓根螺钉系统固定重建脊柱稳定性,配合支具外固定,患者可在术后3周离床活动。  相似文献   

7.
目的:探讨后路凹侧松解联合双极楔形截骨治疗分节不全型重度脊柱侧凸的临床效果及其安全性。方法:自2004年11月~2009年10月,采用经后路凹侧肋椎关节松解和对分节不全脊柱节段行双极楔形截骨治疗重度脊柱侧凸患者14例。其中男8例,女6例,年龄14~22岁,平均17.6岁;术前冠状位侧凸Cobb角83°~139°,平均99.4°;侧凸柔韧性7.8%~20.1%,平均14.3%;冠状位偏移距离0.8~6.3cm,平均3.4cm。3例合并有胸椎后凸畸形,2例合并胸椎前凸畸形。收集手术时间、出血量、并发症、术后及未次随访时的侧凸Cobb角和冠状位偏移距离等临床数据并分析。结果:手术时间6.4~11.2h,平均8.6h;术中出血量3100~4500ml,平均3750ml。凹侧肋椎关节松解4~6个,平均5.2个。1例因椎弓根钉侵入T5椎管致左下肢不全性瘫痪,后经拔除该钉,3个月后脊髓神经功能完全恢复。1例术中发生血气胸,术后行胸腔闭式引流,2周后痊愈。术后随访24~48个月,平均32.6个月。末次随访时侧凸Cobb角12°~53°,平均34.9°,矫正率50.5%~87.2%,平均65.3%;冠状位偏移距离为0.4~2.6cm,平均1.0cm,矫正率12.5%~89.5%,平均65.9%。末次随访时所有患者获得良好的骨性愈合,内固定无断钉及松动,矫正度无显著丢失。结论:后路凹侧肋椎关节松解联合双极楔形截骨治疗椎体分节不全型重度脊柱侧凸,能较好地改善脊柱的柔韧性并保持截骨间隙的相对稳定,是治疗椎体分节不全型重度先天性脊柱侧凸安全有效的方法。  相似文献   

8.
青少年重度脊柱侧凸前后路手术治疗分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
目的探讨青少年重度脊柱侧凸安全有效的治疗方法。方法对25例青少年重度脊柱侧凸(侧凸角度(Cobb’s法)80°~130°,平均88°。)患者采用脊柱前路松解,后路矫正、固定的方法治疗。结果本组经随访13月~5年3月,平均2年1月,术后侧凸矫正55°~95°,平均57°。结论青少年重度脊柱侧凸采用前后路手术治疗可取得明显临床效果。  相似文献   

9.
重度脊柱侧凸的后路手术矫治   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
目的评价后路矫形内固定术治疗重度脊柱侧凸的疗效。方法重度脊柱侧凸患者16例,进行后路矫形内固定术治疗,术前主弯Cobb角71°-110°(84°±11°),其中矢状面异常患者11例。结果手术时间3.4—5.1(4.1±0.6)h,出血量570—1120(778±178)ml,平均融合节段11(9—13)个椎体,术后主弯Cobb角24°-44°(31°±5°),11例矢状面异常患者重新恢复了胸椎生理性后凸和腰椎生理性前凸,未发生感染、血气胸和神经系统等并发症。终末随访时,主弯Cobb角27°-45°(33°±5°),矫正丢失率为0—13%(7%±5%),固定范围内植骨全部融合,未发生术后失代偿和假关节形成。结论后路矫形内固定术是治疗重度脊柱侧凸安全有效的方法。  相似文献   

10.
青少年麻痹性脊柱侧凸前后路手术治疗分析   总被引:3,自引:1,他引:3  
目的 探讨青少年麻痹性脊柱侧凸安全有效的治疗方法。方法 对 18例青少年麻痹性脊柱侧凸 (侧凸角度 (Cobbs法 ) 70°~ 130°,平均 85°。后凸角度 ,70°~ 80°,平均为 45°)患者采用脊柱前路松解 ,后路器械矫正、固定的方法治疗。结果 经 10月~ 2年 2月随访 ,平均 1年 8月 ,术后侧凸矫正 6 0°~ 95°,平均 6 5°,后凸矫正 7°~ 5 4°,平均 34°,无一例发生严重并发症。结论 脊柱前路松解 ,后路器械矫正固定术对青少年麻痹性脊柱侧凸的治疗具有明显的治疗效果  相似文献   

11.
目的对重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸矫正技术的进展进行综述。方法查阅近年来国内外重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸的相关文献,总结重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸矫正技术的最新进展。结果重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸矫正技术有如下进展:Halo-重力牵引应用增多;尝试了后路矫形术中应用Halo-股骨髁上牵引;全椎弓根螺钉固定矫形技术逐步得到推广;经后路全脊椎切除技术、一期前后路手术及单纯后路矫形手术应用增多。结论各种矫形技术的进展显显著提高了重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸的矫形效果,但目前尚无标准化治疗方案,未来可期待更显著的进展。  相似文献   

12.

Background Context

Many different correction methods have been reported to treat severe and rigid scoliosis. In the past, anterior and posterior spinal fusion (APSF), which included an anterior release followed by posterior instrumented fusion, was widely applied. In recent years, anterior/posterior vertebral column resection (APVCR) is used to treat severe and rigid scoliosis.

Purpose

We aimed to compare the clinical results of APSF and APVCR for severe and rigid scoliosis.

Study Design

This is a retrospective, one-center, institutional review board-approved study.

Patient Sample

A total of 48 patients with severe and rigid scoliosis treated by APSF or APVCR were enrolled.

Outcome Measures

Comparisons between groups were made regarding the following variables: age at surgery, gender, etiology, flexibility of main curve, anterior release length, posterior fusion length, screw number, operation time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization time, follow-up duration, different radiological parameters, complication rate, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores.

Methods

According to the operating technique, 48 patients with severe and rigid scoliosis were divided into two groups. In the first group, 26 patients were treated by APSF. In the second group, 22 patients were treated by APVCR. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. The radiographic parameters as well as anterior release length, posterior fusion length, screw number, operation time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization time, complication rate, and demographic data were analyzed.

Results

There was no significant difference in age, gender, etiology, flexibility of main curve, anterior release length, posterior fusion length, screw number, and follow-up between the two groups. The APVCR group had longer operation and hospitalization time, and more blood loss. There was no significant difference in the preoperative main curve between the two groups, but the APVCR group had smaller main curve at postoperation and final follow-up, and higher correction rate at immediate postoperation and final follow-up. There was no significant difference in the preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up thoracic kyphosis, and coronal and sagittal balance between the two groups. There was no significant difference in complication rate between the two groups. Analysis of the preoperative SRS-22 questionnaire revealed no difference between the two groups. At final follow-up, APSF and APVCR groups had similar scores in the function, pain, self-image, mental health, and satisfaction with the treatment domains.

Conclusions

Compared with APSF, treating severe and rigid scoliosis by APVCR means longer operation and hospitalization time, and more blood loss, but it allows better correction rate of main curve. Furthermore, SRS-22 questionnaire improvement scores were similar for both correction methods.  相似文献   

13.

Background Context

Treatment guidelines for severe and rigid syringomyelia-associated scoliosis (SRSMS) are limited. Typically, surgeons apply practice guidelines for severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis (SRIS) to treat SRSMS. No study has directly compared the results of surgical treatment between patients with SRSMS and those with SRIS.

Purpose

The present study was performed to compare the outcomes of surgical correction of SRSMS and SRIS from clinical and radiographic perspectives.

Study Design

This is a retrospective, case-matched, single-center, institutional review board-approved study.

Patient Sample

A total of 26 patients with SRSMS or SRIS treated by an anterior and posterior vertebral column resection approach or an internal distraction approach were enrolled.

Outcome Measures

The SRSMS and SRIS groups were compared on the following variables: fusion length, screw number, operation time, estimated blood loss, follow-up duration, different radiological parameters (including main thoracic curve, cranial compensatory curve, caudal compensatory curve, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, thoracic apical vertebral translation, coronal balance, and sagittal vertical axis), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores, and complication rate.

Methods

Thirteen patients with SRSMS were matched with patients with SRIS on curve magnitude, the flexibility of the main curve, surgical procedure, age, and gender. All patients had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The radiographic parameters and demographic data from patients were evaluated before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at the latest follow-up.

Results

The case matches were relatively ideal except one pair with the main curve in the opposite direction. There was no significant difference in fusion length, screw number, operation time, estimated blood loss, or follow-up duration between the two groups. No significant differences were found between the two groups in the main curve or caudal compensatory curve before surgery, immediately after the operation, or at the final follow-up. The correction of thoracic apical vertebral translation in the SRIS group was better than that in the SRSMS group. The SRSMS group had a larger preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up cranial compensatory curve and a lower correction rate than did the SRIS group. There was no significant difference in preoperative coronal balance between the two groups. After surgery, the coronal balance in the SRSMS and SRIS groups averaged 24.4±13.2?mm and 12.1±7.9?mm, respectively, which was significantly different (p=.04). At the most recent follow-up, the coronal balance in the SRSMS group improved to 14.8±12.6?mm, and it was 11.8±8.6?mm in the SRIS group. No significant difference was found between the two groups (p=.56). There was no significant difference in thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, or sagittal vertical axis before surgery, immediately after the operation, or at the final follow-up. Before surgery and at the final follow-up, the two groups had similar scores on function, pain, self-image, mental health, and satisfaction. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups.

Conclusions

Typically, surgical correction outcomes are similar in patients with SRSMS and SRIS. Patients with SRIS tended to have a smaller cranial compensatory curve and better correction of the cranial compensatory curve and thoracic apical vertebral translation. Patients with SRSMS tended to have a higher proportion and greater amount of postoperative coronal imbalance, which may be improved during follow-up.  相似文献   

14.
头盆环牵引全脊柱截骨内固定治疗重度脊柱弯曲   总被引:1,自引:9,他引:1  
[目的]介绍头盆环牵引全脊柱截骨加内固定治疗重度脊柱弯曲的手术方法,并总结185例重度脊柱弯曲的治疗结果。[方法]对重度脊柱侧弯患者,先用头盆环牵引,使重弯变为轻弯,以便置入器械的安装,再在头盆环牵引下进行截骨矫正畸形和内固定手术,术后继续配戴头盆环制动,术后第2d即可下床站立活动,给护理工作带来极大方便。[结果]作者自1983~2003年,采用此法治疗重度脊柱侧弯185例,平均矫正率是70.32%。脊柱截骨断端能达到坚固的骨性融合,矫正率丢失平均在5°以内,术后晚期并发脱钩者4例,均经再次手术固定解决,对矫正效果无影响。1例术后1年并发感染,拆除置入器械后,伤口很快愈合,X线所见植骨愈合良好。1例并发神经根疼痛,而后逐渐减轻,所有病例未见脊髓损伤和神经系统并发症发生。[结论]头盆环牵引加全脊柱截骨是治疗重度脊柱侧弯的有效方法,对那些仅用单纯器械无法安装,置入困难的病例,经头盆环牵引后,内固定器械容易安装,再加上全脊柱截骨,能使弯曲的脊柱进一步伸直,减轻了内固定器械所承受的负荷力,避免了脱钩断棍的发生,为治疗重度脊柱侧弯的有效手段。  相似文献   

15.
改良哈氏棒椎弓根螺钉治疗儿童重度先天性脊柱侧凸   总被引:5,自引:1,他引:4  
目的:总结23例儿童(平均年龄11.1岁)重度先天性脊柱侧凸采用改良哈氏棒椎弓根螺钉的治疗结果。方法:用改良哈氏棒椎弓根螺钉配合脊柱松解或/和头盆环牵引后器械固定。结果:平均随访25.8个月。术前侧凸平均Cobb角102.3°,悬吊位95.1°;术后侧凸平均Cobb角57.6°,平均矫正率41.9%,无不可逆性脊髓损伤。结论:改良哈氏棒固定减少了哈氏器械所致的脱钩、断棒等并发症,配合脊柱松解或/和头盆环牵引,减少了脊髓牵拉损伤,提高了矫正率  相似文献   

16.
【摘要】 目的:探讨分期前路松解、后路撑开联合后路固定融合治疗重度僵硬型脊柱侧凸患者侧弯及躯干平衡的改善情况,通过对不同撑开次数的手术效果及卫生经济学指标对比来评价第二次撑开的意义。方法:2010年1月~2014年1月共收治重度僵硬型脊柱侧凸(Cobb角>90°,柔韧度<30%)患者23例,根据后路撑开次数分为一次撑开组及两次撑开组。所有患者一期手术均为前路松解和第一次撑开,两次撑开组患者第二次撑开在第一次撑开后10d进行,两组患者均在撑开术后2周行后路融合固定术。分析比较两组患者术前、术后影像学躯干平衡参数;同时对两组患者并发症发生率、手术时间、手术出血量、住院时间、住院花费等卫生经济学指标进行对比。结果:总共有23例患者纳入研究,一次撑开组11例,两次撑开组12例。术前两组患者主弯Cobb角、主弯柔韧度、冠状位平衡、矢状位平衡、胸椎后凸、腰椎前凸差异无显著性(P>0.05)。融合术后,两组患者主弯Cobb角、冠状位平衡、矢状位平衡较术前均有明显改善,差异有显著性(P<0.05);但两组间比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。两次撑开组中第一次与第二次撑开后除主弯Cobb角有明显改善外(P<0.05),其他指标间差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。一次撑开组手术失血量、平均手术时间、住院时间、住院总费用均显著少于两次撑开组(P<0.05)。两次撑开组围术期共有2例手术并发症发生(1例胸腔大量积液,1例术后下肢麻木,均通过相应治疗后恢复),一次撑开组无相关并发症发生。结论:前路松解、后路撑开联合后路固定融合是一种治疗重度僵硬型脊柱侧凸有效安全的方法,两次撑开次能有限增加的躯干平衡的矫形效果,但可能会带来较高的手术费用及增加并发症发生率;从卫生经济学角度出发,临床上对于第二次的撑开应慎重进行。  相似文献   

17.
目的探讨后路减压内固定植骨融合治疗退变性腰椎侧凸的临床疗效。方法后路减压内固定植骨融合治疗19例退变性腰椎侧凸患者。手术前后进行JOA、VAS评分评估临床疗效,影像学测量比较手术前后的Cobb角、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、腰椎前凸角(LL)。结果所有患者均获得随访,时间11~23(15.7±2.2)个月。JOA评分:术前为12.2分±1.7分,术后3个月为22.7分±3.1分,末次随访为24.0分±2.8分。VAS评分:术前为8.4分±0.5分,术后3个月为1.9分±0.8分,末次随访为1.8分±0.6分。Cobb角:术前为23.9°±4.2°,术后3个月为3.1°±1.4°,末次随访为3.3°±1.1°。LL:术前为31.6°±5.9°,术后3个月为42.5°±6.6°,末次随访为44.3°±6.0°。PT:术前为21.5°±7.3°,术后3个月为18.9°±9.4°,末次随访为18.5°±7.8°。以上各项指标术后3个月与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),末次随访与术后3个月比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论后路减压内固定植骨融合治疗退变性腰椎侧凸可充分减压,缓解症状,重建腰椎矢状面和冠状面的序列并维持脊柱稳定。  相似文献   

18.
目的探讨经后路截骨联合椎弓根内固定矫形治疗僵硬性脊柱侧后凸畸形疗效。方法对26例僵硬性脊柱侧后凸畸形患者进行后路截骨、椎弓根内固定矫形。8例行后路Ponte截骨,13例行椎弓根截骨术(PSO)联合Ponte截骨,5例行全椎体切除术(VCR)。比较患者术前、术后和末次随访时Cobb角的变化及C7中垂线与骶骨中垂线距离的变化。结果患者均获得随访,时间12~60个月。侧凸Cobb角:术前30°~135°(90.7°±30.6°),术后12°~30°(18°±5.6°),矫正率为82.5%,末次随访13°~32°(20°±5.8°),丢失4.3%;后凸Cobb角:术前20°~60°(40.6°±18.5°),术后10°~26°(16.8°±6.2°),矫正率为85%,末次随访13°~30°(20.5°±7.0°),丢失3.7%;C7中垂线与骶骨中垂线距离:术前3.8~6.5(5.1±1.3)cm,术后0.3~1.3(0.7±0.3)cm,末次随访0.4~1.7(0.8±0.3)cm。所有患者未发生神经损伤等并发症,仅1例患者术后3个月出现内固定松动,经延长固定节段后骨性融合。结论术前充分的评估,选择合适的后路截骨方式,联合椎弓根内固定矫形治疗僵硬性脊柱侧弯,能有效矫正畸形和恢复脊柱冠、矢状面平衡。  相似文献   

19.
目的:评价经后路改良PSO截骨治疗成人特发性僵硬性脊柱侧弯的安全性及早期临床疗效。方法2009-05-2012-04采用经后路顶椎区改良PSO截骨、凸侧部分肋骨头颈段切除及椎弓根螺钉固定矫正治疗成人特发性僵硬性脊柱侧弯患者17例。测量患者术前术后X线片冠状面及矢状面Cobb角, C7中垂线与骶骨中垂线距离,C7铅垂线与骶骨后上缘间的水平距离(SVA间距)以及身高指标来评价侧后凸畸形的纠正和植骨融合情况。结果后凸Cobb角术前平均为50°,术后15°;侧凸Cobb角术前平均为90°,术后18°;C7中垂线与骶骨中垂线距离术前平均4.2 cm,术后0.7 cm;SVA间距术前平均4.1 cm,术后1.5 cm。术前术后比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论经后路改良PSO截骨、椎弓根螺钉固定矫正治疗成人特发性僵硬性脊柱侧弯,能有效矫正畸形和恢复脊柱冠、矢状面平衡,早期结果令人满意。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号