口腔内黏膜尿道成形治疗前尿道狭窄10年经验总结

目的 探讨口腔内黏膜尿道成形治疗尿道狭窄的长期效果. 方法 2001年1月至2010年12月,应用口腔内黏膜(颊黏膜和舌黏膜)尿道成形治疗前尿道狭窄255例.尿道狭窄段长度3 ～18 cm,平均6 cm.尿道成形采用保留原尿道板的扩大尿道成形术或埋藏黏膜条背侧替代尿道成形术.对49例尿道狭窄段≥8 cm者采取双侧颊黏膜拼接、颊粘膜与舌黏膜拼接或双侧连续长条舌黏膜尿道成形. 结果 术后随访8 ～120个月,平均37个月.230例患者排尿通畅,尿线粗,最大尿流率为16～51 ml/s,平均26 ml/s.尿道造影显示重建段尿道管腔通畅.总成功率90.2％.25例患者于术后1年内发生并发症,其中尿道再次狭窄17例,尿道皮肤瘘8例.17例尿道再狭窄患者中15例再次行口腔内黏膜尿道成形,2例吻合口狭窄行尿道内切开,术后排尿通畅;8例尿道皮肤瘘均接受尿瘘修补术后治愈. 结论 口腔颊黏膜和舌黏膜均是良好的尿道替代物,舌黏膜取材较颊黏膜更为便利;口腔内多种黏膜的组合移植重建尿道是治疗长段前尿道狭窄( ≥8 cm)的有效方法.     

舌黏膜尿道成形治疗前尿道狭窄（附80例报告）

目的：研究舌黏膜尿道成形治疗尿道狭窄的有效性和安全性。方法：2006年8月～2008年12月采用舌黏膜尿道成形治疗80例前尿道狭窄,尿道狭窄段2．5～18cm,其中30例为长段尿道狭窄（9～18cm）采用双侧舌黏膜或舌黏膜与颊黏膜或与带蒂包皮拼接尿道成形治疗。尿道成形采用两种术式：保留原尿道板的扩大尿道腔37例;埋藏黏膜条43例。结果：术后随访4～30（平均16．8）个月,7例发生并发症,其中尿瘘4例,再次发生尿道狭窄3例,其余患者排尿通畅,最大尿流率从15．2～54．6（平均28．7）ml／s。结论：舌黏膜是一种修复前尿道狭窄较好的尿道替代物,双侧舌黏膜尿道成形能成功治疗长段、复杂性尿道狭窄。     

颊黏膜尿道成形术治疗前尿道狭窄的临床分析

目的 探讨利用游离口腔颊黏膜尿道成形术治疗前尿道狭窄的疗效.方法 2011年6月至2012年12月采用颊黏膜腹侧扩大替代尿道成形术治疗25例前尿道狭窄,狭窄段长度为3.5～10 cm,平均5.74 cm.术前耻骨上膀胱造瘘16例,余9例术前最大尿流率2.4～7.6 mL/s,平均4.3 mL/s.结果 术后随访3～18个月,平均6.5个月.术后患者排尿通畅22例(88％),尿动力学检查显示最大尿流率为14～28mL/s,平均19.4 mL/s.3例(12％)吻合口处狭窄,经历尿道扩张后,排尿通畅.所有患者均无感染及尿道皮肤瘘发生,口腔颊黏膜移植物均成活.结论 口腔颊黏膜可作为较理想的尿道替代物,适合长段或多段狭窄的尿道修复.     

舌黏膜尿道成形治疗尿道狭窄的初步报告

目的:探讨舌黏膜补片法尿道成形治疗尿道狭窄的疗效。方法:采用舌黏膜尿道成形治疗尿道狭窄14例。尿道狭窄段3.5~14cm,平均6.2cm;术前耻骨上膀胱造瘘8例,余6例排尿均较为困难,最大尿流率2.5~5.5ml/s,平均3.8ml/s。结果:术后随访2~8个月,1例因伤口感染致尿道皮肤瘘,余患者均排尿通畅,最大尿流率增至22~51ml/s,平均29.6ml/s。结论:舌黏膜具有取材方便、对患者创伤小、抗感染力强等特点,是一种较好的尿道替代物,尤其适合尿道狭窄段<6cm的患者。     

结肠黏膜重建尿道治疗复杂性超长段尿道狭窄

目的:探讨结肠黏膜重建尿道治疗复杂性超长段尿道狭窄的应用价值与疗效.方法:对既往已有平均2.5次不成功的尿道修复史的35例患者,采用结肠黏膜一期尿道成形术,治疗其复杂性超长段尿道狭窄.所用结肠黏膜重建的尿道长10～20cm,平均14.6cm.术后分别行尿道造影,检测尿流率,部分患者行尿道镜检查.结果:患者术后随访3～60个月,平均28.5个月.31例术后排尿通畅,最大尿流率大于15 ml/s.1例因结肠黏膜新尿道与前列腺部尿道吻合区血供较差,术后继发尿道狭窄;1例在术后3个月并发尿道外口狭窄,经手术矫正后排尿通畅;2例分别在术后46,20个月时发生与重建尿道无关的球膜部尿道狭窄,采用口腔黏膜尿道成形术后排尿通畅.结论:利用结肠黏膜重建尿道治疗复杂性超长段尿道狭窄或闭锁,是一种可行而有效的方法,尤其是适合在较多常规方法治疗失败者.     

游离黏膜尿道成形治疗硬化性苔藓样病所致尿道狭窄的疗效观察

目的 提高对硬化性苔藓样病( lichen sclerosus,LS)导致尿道狭窄的认识,观察游离黏膜尿道成形治疗LS所致尿道狭窄的疗效. 方法 2007年1月-2010年12月收治LS所致前尿道狭窄患者36例,年龄27～75岁,平均41岁.尿道狭窄段长5.0 ～20.0 cm,平均11.5 cm.根据尿道狭窄段长短和严重程度选择不同的黏膜组织,其中行口腔内黏膜(舌、颊黏膜)尿道成形27例,结肠黏膜尿道成形8例,另1例老年患者行前尿道劈开.在行尿道重建术前对病变累及的阴茎头、尿道口、尿道行病理学检查. 结果 36例患者术后3周拔除导尿管,排尿通畅;活检结果提示上皮基底部特征性病变,过度角化,上皮层变薄,淋巴细胞浸润等.术后随访6 ～ 50个月,平均22个月.出现尿道外口狭窄3例(8.3％),其中口腔内黏膜尿道成形者2例,结肠黏膜重建尿道者1例,行尿道外口切开后排尿通畅.余患者术后排尿通畅,最大尿流率17.2～47.0 ml/s,平均23.4 ml/s. 结论 采用游离黏膜尿道成形治疗LS所致尿道狭窄疗效较好,但需密切随访,因病变迁延可致尿道再狭窄,尤其是尿道口再狭窄.     

舌黏膜补片治疗复杂性尿道狭窄的疗效观察

目的：探讨使用舌黏膜补片尿道成形治疗复杂性尿道狭窄的有效性。方法：2006年12月～2009年1月应用舌黏膜补片法治疗复杂性前尿道狭窄患者36例。结果：术后随访3～25个月，平均13．6个月。2例术后出现尿瘘，经再次手术修补后好转；另2例术后出现尿道狭窄，经尿道扩张后治愈。余者术后排尿通畅，平均最大尿流率达23．8ml／s。结论：舌黏膜具有取材方便、取材部位并发症少等优点，是一种治疗前尿道狭窄较好的替代物。     

复杂性尿道下裂修复失败后的治疗

目的 探讨不同游离黏膜、带蒂皮瓣或二种组织拼接尿道成形术治疗复杂性尿道下裂修复失败后病例的效果.方法 采用3种游离黏膜或带蒂阴茎皮瓣尿道成形治疗尿道下裂修复失败后患者36例,其中带蒂阴茎皮瓣尿道成形7例,舌黏膜与阴茎皮瓣拼接重建尿道3例.结肠黏膜重建尿道2例,1条舌黏膜重建尿道9例,1条颊黏膜重建尿道7例,采用2条口腔内黏膜拼接重建尿道8例.阴茎用弹力绷带包扎4 d,每天用抗生素液冲洗尿道1次.结果 36例术后随访3～84个月,平均32.6个月.术后2～3周发牛尿瘘4例.术后2～3个月新尿道发生狭窄3例,其中吻合口狭窄1例.经尿道扩张5次后排尿通畅;尿道外口狭窄2例,经手术矫正后均排尿通畅,Q_(max)分别为37.3和28.7 ml/s.余者排尿通畅,尿线粗,Q_(max) 18.0～46.0 ml/s,平均26.8 ml/s.结论 舌黏膜与颊黏膜具有取材方便、创伤小的特点,较适合于尿道下裂修复失败后皮源少患者的尿道重建.     

口腔黏膜尿道成形术治疗前尿道狭窄:单中心5年经验总结

目的探讨口腔黏膜尿道成形术治疗前尿道狭窄的有效性和安全性。方法 2011年6月至2016年6月利用口腔黏膜尿道成形术治疗105例前尿道狭窄,其中颊黏膜尿道成形25例、舌黏膜尿道成形80例。狭窄段长度为2.5~15cm,平均(7.31±3.42)cm。术前耻骨上膀胱造瘘85例;余20例术前最大尿流率2.2~10.2mL/s,平均(4.6±1.2)mL/s。结果术后随访6~59月,平均(38.6±10.4)月。术后患者排尿通畅98例(93.33%);尿动力学检查显示最大尿流率为16.2~37.4mL/s,平均(23.2±1.3)mL/s。7例(6.67%)出现尿道再狭窄,包含尿道外口狭窄2例、吻合口处状狭窄5例。尿道外口狭窄1例行尿道扩张后排尿通畅,1例行尿道外口成形。吻合口狭窄4例经历尿道扩张后排尿通畅,1例行颊黏膜尿道成形术后排尿通畅。所有患者均无感染,口腔黏膜移植物均存活,无尿道皮肤瘘发生。结论口腔黏膜可作为较理想的尿道替代物,适合多段或长段前尿道狭窄的修复治疗,颊黏膜和舌黏膜具有同等优势,而舌黏膜具有取材方便、材料充足等优点更适合于前尿道狭窄的治疗。     

犬舌黏膜与颊黏膜组合移植重建尿道的实验研究

目的 探讨犬舌黏膜与颊黏膜组合移植替代尿道的可行性和有效性. 方法杂种雌犬7只,平均体质量13 kg,剥离尿道黏膜4 cm×1 cm,取2 cm×1 cm舌侧面黏膜和颊黏膜各1条,拼接后移植至尿道内,恢复尿道黏膜的连续性.术后留置硅胶导尿管1周,拔除尿管后观察排尿情况.1.5～12.0个月后行逆行尿道造影检测实验犬尿道通畅情况,并用10 F尿管证实有无狭窄.随后处死实验犬,测定移植物长度并行病理组织学检查,观察舌黏膜与颊黏膜组合移植至尿道后组织学改变情况. 结果7只实验犬均存活,排尿通畅6只,发生尿道狭窄1只;无尿瘘.移植手术前后舌黏膜和颊黏膜拼接长度分别为(4.00±0.15)和(3.75±0.23)cm,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).排尿通畅犬移植黏膜存活良好;舌黏膜与颊黏膜交界处愈合良好,无狭窄发生;光镜下见鳞状上皮呈连续分布,拼接移植黏膜的鳞状上皮与尿道的移行上皮区分明显,移植黏膜的鳞状上:皮有渐被尿道移行上皮替代的趋势.结论 犬舌黏膜和颊黏膜组合移植可替代尿道黏膜并恢复尿道的连续性.     

Substitution urethroplasty using oral mucosa graft for male anterior urethral stricture disease: Current topics and reviews

Male anterior urethral stricture is scarring of the subepithelial tissue of the corpus spongiosum that constricts the urethral lumen, decreasing the urinary stream. Its surgical management is a challenging problem, and has changed dramatically in the past several decades. Open surgical repair using grafts or flaps, called substitution urethroplasty, has become the gold standard procedure for anterior urethral strictures that are not amenable to excision and primary anastomosis. Oral mucosa harvested from the inner cheek (buccal mucosa) is an ideal material, and is most commonly used for substitution urethroplasty, and lingual mucosa harvested from the underside of the tongue has recently emerged as an alternative material with equivalent outcome. Onlay augmentation of oral mucosa graft on the ventral side (ventral onlay) or dorsal side (dorsal onlay, Barbagli procedure) has been widely used for bulbar urethral stricture with comparable success rates. In bulbar urethral strictures containing obliterative or nearly obliterative segments, either a two‐sided dorsal plus ventral onlay (Palminteri technique) or a combination of excision and primary anastomosis and onlay augmentation (augmented anastomotic urethroplasty) are the procedures of choice. Most penile urethral strictures can be repaired in a one‐stage procedure either by dorsal inlay with ventral sagittal urethrotomy (Asopa technique) or dorsolateral onlay with one‐sided urethral dissection (Kulkarni technique); however, staged urethroplasty remains the procedure of choice for complex strictures, including strictures associated with genital lichen sclerosus or failed hypospadias. This article presents an overview of substitution urethroplasty using oral mucosa graft, and reviews current topics.     

Long-term followup of the ventrally placed buccal mucosa onlay graft in bulbar urethral reconstruction

PURPOSE: We investigate whether the short-term success rate (greater than 90%) of buccal mucosa free grafts in the bulbar urethra is sustained in the long term. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 60 patients a ventrally placed buccal mucosa graft was used for repair of bulbar urethral strictures. Of these patients 49 had undergone previous attempt at repair (urethroplasty in 4, internal urethrotomy in 45). Mean graft length was 4.8 cm. In 9 patients a distal penile fasciocutaneous flap was also used for repair of concomitant penile urethral stricture. In 8 of the 9 patients the buccal mucosa graft was combined with end-to-end urethroplasty and 2 buccal mucosa grafts were used in tandem in 1. Followup was at least 1 year in all cases (mean 47 months, range 12 to 107). Failure was defined as an obstructive voiding pattern with radiographic or cystoscopic evidence of recurrent stricture. RESULTS: Bulbar stricture repair was successful in 54 patients (90%) and 4 of the remaining 6 responded to 1 internal urethrotomy for a long-term success rate of 97%. Preoperative clinical characteristics were not significantly different between those who experienced success or failure. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcome analysis of ventrally placed buccal mucosa onlay grafts for bulbar urethral strictures demonstrates a durable success rate of 90%. This rate can be improved (97%) with the judicious use of internal urethrotomy.     

Oral mucosal grafts urethroplasty for the treatment of long segmented anterior urethral strictures

Objective  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using oral mucosal grafts for urethroplasty in the treatment of complex segmented urethral strictures. Methods  Between January 2002 and January 2008, 25 cases of long or multi-segmented urethral strictures (10–18 cm, mean 11.72) were treated using combined two oral mucosal graft urethroplasty. Of the 25 patients, combined double buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty was performed in nine patients, double lingual mucosal graft (LMG) urethroplasty in seven patients and combined lingual and buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in nine patients. Results  Follow-up was obtained for 6–72 months (mean 26.83) post-operatively. Urethrocutaneous fistulas developed in two patients. Urethral strictures developed in one patient undergoing BMG urethroplasty; the patient underwent five urethral dilations, after which he voided well with a urinary peak flow of 26.4 ml/s. Meatal stenosis developed in one patient undergoing LMG and a second operation was required, after which the patient voided well (urinary peak flow of 28.7 ml/s). The other patients voided well and urinary peak flow rates ranged from 16.8 to 49.2 ml/s (mean 28.65 ml/s). Conclusion  Combined two oral mucosal grafts substitution urethroplasty is an effective technique for the treatment of long, segmented urethral strictures.     

Substitution urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures: a critical appraisal of various techniques

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare the outcome of various techniques of substitution urethroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 2000, 109 patients (mean age 39.5 years) underwent substitution urethroplasty for recurrent anterior urethral strictures. Between 1989 and 1995 the procedure was by ventral placement of free grafts (bladder mucosa, buccal mucosa, penile skin) or penile skin flaps. From 1995 onwards the flaps and grafts (buccal mucosa) were applied either ventrally or dorsally. Stricture recurrence and the complications associated with each technique were compared. RESULTS: Ventral onlay repairs were associated with a higher incidence of complications than dorsal repairs, e.g. postvoid dribbling (39% vs 23%, P = 0.01), ejaculatory dysfunction (20% vs 5%, P = 0.03) and flap/graft pseudo-diverticulum or out-pouching (26% vs 2.6%, P = 0.01). Superficial penile skin necrosis was significantly more common with the use of penile skin flaps than with free grafts. There was no significant difference in stricture recurrence, erectile dysfunction and residual penile deformity among the various techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Dorsal free graft/flap onlay urethroplasty gives better results than ventrally placed free grafts/flaps. Dorsal onlay buccal mucosal urethroplasty is a versatile procedure and associated with fewer complications than other substitution methods.     

口腔颊粘膜Ⅰ期修复复杂性前尿道狭窄(附六例报告)

目的：探索修复前尿道狭窄的新型替代材料和手术方法。方法：将狭窄或闭锁的前尿道于腹侧纵形劈开，采用口腔颊粘膜补片法治疗复杂性前尿道狭窄患者6例7次。结果：患者前尿道修复术后排尿通畅，平均最大尿流率25．8ml／s，尿道造影示尿道通畅，B超提示吻合口愈合良好，瘢痕少，无明显狭窄。结论：口腔颊粘膜取材方便，创伤小，粘膜易存活，抗感染能力强，修复尿道效果好。