Long-term combination treatment with clozapine and filgrastim in patients with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis

Short-term treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has been successful in reducing the duration of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. Long-term combination treatment with filgrastim and clozapine in patients with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis has only been described in two previous cases. We describe three patients with schizophrenia who developed granulocytopenia or agranulocytosis during treatment with clozapine and who did not respond to other antipsychotics. The patients received long-term combination treatment with clozapine and filgrastim. Using a combination treatment with filgrastim and clozapine, the psychotic symptoms were successfully controlled and no haematological complications were observed during the follow-up periods of 11, 30 and 48 months, respectively. Our cases suggest that long-term treatment with filgrastim might be a useful, but exceptional, treatment approach in patients who have developed clozapine-induced granulocytopenia or agranulocytosis.     

Responses to apomorphine,amphetamine, and neuroleptics in schizophrenic subjects

Twenty-one schizophrenic subjects, who had been neuroleptic-free, were tested for responsiveness to dopaminergic agonists: Apomorphine emesis threshold was determined and change in psychopathology after 0.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine orally was rated. The subjects' subsequent response to neuroleptic treatment were also determined. Sensitivity to apomorphine emesis was also determined in a nonschizophrenic control group. Apomorphine emesis threshold was not significantly different in the schizophrenic and control groups. Correlations were done between baseline psychopathology, apomorphine sensitivity, and changes in psychopathology after amphetamine and after neuroleptic treatment. On the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), baseline psychopathology correlated with improvement after neuroleptics and, on the clinical global impressions (CGI), increase of psychopathology after amphetamine also correlated with improvement after neuroleptic treatment. An inverse correlation was found between several indices of sensitivity to amphetamine (psychopathology change) and emetic sensitivity to apomorphine. An examination of individual subjects' responses to amphetamine and, subsequently, neuroleptics, suggested that in the absence of significant clinical change after amphetamine a brisk therapeutic response to neuroleptics was rare:     

Effects of atypical antipsychotics on the inflammatory response system in schizophrenic patients resistant to treatment with typical neuroleptics.

There is now some evidence that schizophrenia may be accompanied by an activation of the inflammatory response system (IRS) and that typical antipsychotics may suppress some signs of IRS activation in that illness. This study was carried out to examine (i) the serum concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), IL-1R antagonist (IL-1RA) and Clara Cell protein (CC16), an endogenous anticytokine, in nonresponders to treatment with typical neuroleptics and (ii) the effects of atypical antipsychotics on the above IRS variables. The above parameters were determined in 17 patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) to treatment with neuroleptics and in seven normal volunteers and 14 schizophrenic patients who had a good response to treatment with antipsychotic agents. Patients with TRS had repeated measurements of the IRS variables before and 2 and 4 months after treatment with atypical antipsychotics. Serum IL-6 was significantly higher in schizophrenic patients, irrespective of their response to typical antipsychotics, than in normal controls. Serum IL-1RA was significantly higher in the TRS patients than in controls, whereas responders took up an intermediate position. The serum concentrations of CC16 were significantly lower after treatment with atypical antipsychotics during 4 months than before treatment. It is concluded that (i) schizophrenia and, in particular, TRS is characterized by an activation of the monocytic arm of cell-mediated immunity and (ii) atypical antipsychotics may decrease the anti-inflammatory capacity of the serum in TRS patients.     

An open trial of buspirone added to neuroleptics in schizophrenic patients

Twenty chronic schizophrenic patients completed at least 2 weeks of a 6-week trial of buspirone (mean dose 23.8 mg/day) added to a stable dose of neuroleptic. At week 6, mean scores were significantly improved (p less than 0.01) on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Simpson Angus Scale for Extrapyramidal Symptoms and the Global Assessment Scale. Overall measures of akathisia and tardive dyskinesia were not significantly changed at week 6. In the 7 patients taking oral haloperidol, mean plasma concentrations of haloperidol were significantly increased (p less than 0.05) by 26% 6 weeks after adding buspirone.     

Mitchell B. Balter Award. Human leukocyte antigen-A1 predicts a good therapeutic response to clozapine with a low risk of agranulocytosis in patients with schizophrenia

Several studies indicate an association between human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. The authors have previously reported a significantly increased frequency of HLA-A1 among patients with schizophrenia who do not respond to conventional drugs, but do respond to clozapine treatment. In this study, the authors addressed the question of whether the same association is found in patients developing granulocytopenia or agranulocytosis. The frequency of the HLA-A1 allele in patients with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis or granulocytopenia was low (11.5%), whereas HLA-A1 was associated with a good therapeutic response to clozapine at an allele frequency of 58%. The frequency of HLA-A1 is 20% in the Finnish population. These results suggest that HLA-A1 may predict a good therapeutic outcome and a low risk of agranulocytosis and, thus, enable defining a subgroup of patients with schizophrenia in whom clozapine treatment could be started early to stop the disease from progressing.     

Reward system activation in schizophrenic patients switched from typical neuroleptics to olanzapine

Rationale High blockade of dopamine D2 receptors in the ventral striatum including the nucleus accumbens may interfere with reward anticipation and cause secondary negative symptoms such as apathy or anhedonia. This may not be the case with newer neuroleptics such as olanzapine, which show less dopamine D2 receptor blockade and a faster off-rate from the receptor. Objectives We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the blood oxygenation level dependent response in the ventral striatum of schizophrenics medicated with typical neuroleptics (T1) and after switching them to olanzapine (T2) and of healthy control subjects at corresponding time points during reward anticipation. Materials and methods Ten schizophrenics, while medicated with typical neuroleptics (T1) and after having been switched to olanzapine (T2), and ten matched healthy volunteers participated in a monetary incentive delay task, in which visual cues predicted that a rapid response to a subsequent target stimulus would either result in monetary gain or have no consequence. Results During reward anticipation, healthy volunteers showed significantly higher ventral striatal activation compared to schizophrenic patients treated with typical neuroleptics but not olanzapine, which was reflected in a significant interaction between group and session. In patients treated with typical neuroleptics, but not with olanzapine, decreased left ventral striatal activation was correlated with negative symptoms. Conclusions Failure to activate the ventral striatum during reward anticipation was pharmacologically state-dependent and observed only in patients treated with typical neuroleptics but not with olanzapine, which may indicate that this drug did not induce secondary negative symptoms via interference with reward anticipation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Schlagenhauf and Juckel contributed equally.     

Prolactin response to zotepine in schizophrenic patients

The prolactin response to an antipsychotic drug zotepine, which has both antidopaminergic and antiserotonergic effects, was studied in 24 inpatients suffering from schizophrenia. The daily dose was 100 mg in the first week, and 200 mg for the next three weeks. The mean serum concentrations of prolactin at the daily dose of 200 mg, but not 100 mg, were significantly higher than that before treatment. The δ prolactin (the change from the pretreatment concentration) was significantly correlated with zotepine concentrations at each week. At low zotepine concentrations, patients with high pre-treatment prolactin concentrations showed negative δ prolactin. The present study thus suggests that at high concentrations zotepine shows predominantly antidopaminergic effects, while at low concentrations its antiserotonergic effects are predominant and/or it acts as a dopamine agonist.     

Biologic, pharmacologic, and psychosocial factors influencing response to neuroleptics.

Neuroleptic drugs remain a critical modality in the treatment of schizophrenia. Numerous variables influence response to neuroleptic drugs including biologic, pharmacologic, and psychosocial factors. This review cites some examples of how such factors have been examined.     

Prolactin response to nemonapride,a new antipsychotic drug,in schizophrenic patients

The prolactin response to nemonapride, a new antipsychotic drug, was studied in 27 schizophrenic inpatients (12 males, 15 females). The daily dose of nemonapride was 18 mg/day, and the duration of treatment was 3 weeks. Plasma prolactin concentrations were measured by enzyme immunoassay. Nemonapride treatment significantly (p<0·01) increased prolactin concentrations at each week in both genders. The Δprolactin (the mean concentration during 3 weeks minus the pretreatment concentration) was significantly (p<0·01) greater in females (mean± SD, 81·6±57·8 ng/ml) than males (34·9±19·8 ng/ml). The present study thus shows that nemonapride treatment markedly increases prolactin concentrations in schizophrenic patients, with greater responses in females than males, suggesting a strong D2 receptor blockade property of the drug. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Dysfunction of ventral striatal reward prediction in schizophrenic patients treated with typical, not atypical, neuroleptics

Rational Clinical studies in patients with schizophrenia suggest that atypical neuroleptics are more effective than typical neuroleptics in reducing negative symptoms including apathy and anhedonia. Dysfunction of the dopaminergic reward system may contribute to negative symptoms in schizophrenia.Objective We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the blood oxygen level dependency response in the ventral striatum of medicated schizophrenics and healthy control subjects during reward anticipation.Methods Twenty schizophrenics [ten medicated with typical (e.g., haloperidol) and ten with atypical (e.g., olanzapine and risperidone) neuroleptics] and ten age-matched healthy volunteers participated in an incentive monetary delay task in which visual cues predicted that a rapid response to a subsequent target stimulus would result either in monetary gain or no consequence.Results Healthy volunteers and schizophrenics treated with atypical neuroleptics showed ventral striatal activation in response to reward-indicating cues, but schizophrenics treated with typical neuroleptics did not. In patients treated with typical neuroleptics, decrease in activation of the left ventral striatum was correlated with the severity of negative symptoms.Conclusions Failure to activate the ventral striatum during reward anticipation was previously associated with the severity of negative symptoms in schizophrenia and was also found in schizophrenics treated with typical neuroleptics in this study. Significant blunting of ventral striatal activation was not observed in patients treated with atypical neuroleptics, which may reflect the improved efficacy of these drugs in treating negative symptoms.Georg Juckel and Florian Schlagenhauf contributed equally to this work.     

Neuroendocrine serotonergic and dopaminergic responsivity in male schizophrenic patients during treatment with neuroleptics and after switch to risperidone

RATIONALE: The pharmacological profile of risperidone is that of an atypical neuroleptic regarding its serotonin 5-HT2A and dopamine D2 receptor blocking properties. Treatment with risperidone, though, results in considerably elevated plasma prolactin (PRL) levels which are not observed with other atypical neuroleptics, such as clozapine, indicating a differentiated action on receptors that are involved in PRL release, mainly dopaminergic and serotonergic. OBJECTIVE: To assess the responsivity of serotonergic and dopaminergic receptors during treatment with neuroleptics and after switch to risperidone, using neuroendocrine paradigms. METHODS: Two neuroendocrine challenge tests, measuring the PRL increases induced by acute administration of serotonergic (clomipramine, 25 mg i.v.) and dopaminergic (haloperidol, 5 mg i.m.) drugs were performed in 13 male schizophrenic patients during treatment with typical neuroleptics and, later, after 6 weeks of treatment with risperidone. The tests were also performed in a group of nine healthy male volunteers. PRL was estimated in blood samples taken every 15 min for 1 h for clomipramine and every 30 min for 2 h for haloperidol. Psychopathology was assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). RESULTS: During treatment with neuroleptics (mean dose 1354 mg chlorpromazine equivalents, range 300-2400 mg), i.m. haloperidol caused significant elevations in plasma PRL, which were totally abolished after 6 weeks treatment with risperidone (mean dose 12.1 mg/day, range 8-16 mg/day), indicating complete D2 receptor blockade. In contrast, the PRL increases obtained after clomipramine administration during neuroleptic treatment were preserved after treatment with risperidone. Both PRL response patterns to clomipramine were similar to that of healthy controls. BPRS score was 50.2+/-9.3 points during neuroleptic treatment and was reduced after risperidone to 30.1+/-6.6 points, i.e., 40% in the mean. CONCLUSIONS: During treatment with typical neuroleptics, the PRL responses to clomipramine are normal, and they are preserved after switch to risperidone in doses that cause complete dopamine receptor blockade. Risperidone, a dopamine and 5-HT receptor blocker, does not affect 5-HT receptors that are involved in the PRL release by the 5-HT uptake blocker clomipramine, indicating a different behavior than other atypical neuroleptics such as clozapine or olanzapine, for which a reduction of the PRL release induced by serotonergic agents like fenfluramine or mCPP has been reported. A conclusive identification of the 5-HT receptor subtypes that are involved in this different action cannot be identified at present, but it should be taken into account that risperidone differs from clozapine, showing higher affinity for 5-HT2A than 5-HT2C receptors and lacking the marked affinity of clozapine to 5-HT1A receptors.     

Responses of prolactin and growth hormone to L-tryptophan infusion: Effects in normal subjects and schizophrenic patients receiving neuroleptics

Intravenous infusion of l-tryptophan (LTP) in 18 normal subjects produced a significant increase in plasma prolactin (PRL), growth hormone (GH), and self-ratings of drowsiness. There was no correlation between the PRL and GH responses, or between the hormonal responses and drowsiness. Saline infusion did not result in endocrine or psychological changes. The effect of LTP on both PRL and GH was dose-related in that LTP 7.5 g produced greater endocrine responses than 5.0 g. It was not significantly decreased by cyproheptadine, a 5-HT receptor antagonist. Schizophrenic patients receiving neuroleptics had increased PRL response to LTP, possibly because of the drug-induced disinhibition of PRL release. Their GH response to LTP was markedly decreased. The mechanism of this effect requires further investigation.     

Dopamine D3 receptor gene polymorphism and response to clozapine in schizophrenic Pakastani patients.

The dopamine D3 receptor (DRD3) appears to play an important role in the mediation of antipsychotic drug action. Genetic association of treatment response to the atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine with the DRD3 polymorphism Ser9Gly was investigated in a sample of 32 schizophrenic patients. We found association of treatment response with allele Gly-9 (P=0.0058) and with genotypes consisting of Gly-9 (P=0.033) by this pharmacogenetic approach. A combined analysis with two previous studies (Shaikh et al., Hum. Genet. 97 (1996) 714-719; Malhotra et al., Mol. Psychiatry 3 (1998) 72-75) further substantiates these results (P=0.0041).     

Serum haloperidol levels and clinical response in chronic, treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients

Eleven chronic treatment-resistant schizophrenic in-patients were treated with haloperidol (HPL) or placebo with a fixed ascending dose schedule for 20 weeks. Seven patients relapsed and were withdrawn and five of these re-entered, single-blind, on known active treatment. Two weekly clinical ratings and weekly serum HPL levels were carried out throughout the study. More patients on placebo dropped out and at an earlier stage than those on active treatment but the difference was not statistically significant. Despite wide individual variations in both serum HPL levels and clinical response, these were positively correlated. HPL appeared to be of more value in the prevention of relapse than in symptom reduction. Overall, the clinical response was poor and a 'therapeutic window' could not be demonstrated either for the group as a whole or in any individual patient. There was no additional therapeutic benefit in exceeding serum HPL levels of 20 ng/ml in any of our patients. Since this serum level was achieved by daily doses of 10-40 mg HPL and the relationship between dose and serum level is linear, the use of serum HPL estimations is not likely to be of value in the routine clinical management of treatment-resistant patients.     

Calcium mobilization in platelets from schizophrenic and healthy subjects. Regulation by lithium and neuroleptics

Intracellular free calcium concentrations ([Ca(2+)](1)) were measured in platelets from healthy volunteers before and after adding thrombin, chlorpromazine, haloperidol and/or lithium, and in platelets from DSM-III-R diagnosed schizophrenic patients receiving neuroleptic medication. Thrombin increased [Ca(2+)]( 1) in a dose- dependent fashion. Chlorpromazine and haloperidol also mobilized Ca(2+) in a dose-dependent fashion, and augmented the response to low doses of thrombin without changing the maximal response to thrombin. The effects of all three drugs were not additive, suggesting that they affected the same intraplatelet calcium pool; most likely the dense tubular system. Lithium also increased [Ca(2+) ] but without affecting the response to thrombin, chlorpromazine or haloperidol. The effects of the latter three drugs were additive to that of lithium, suggesting that lithium was acting on a different calcium pool. The response to thrombin was significantly lower in platelets from schizophrenic patients than in platelets from healthy volunteers. Further studies are required to explore potential causes for this observation. Such causes include schizophrenia per se and chronic neuroleptic treatment.     

Switch from neuroleptics to clozapine does not influence pituitary–gonadal axis hormone levels in male schizophrenic patients

Hypothalamic dopaminergic and serotonergic inputs participate in the regulation of pituitary hormones, and drugs that block central dopamine and serotonin receptors are expected to influence the hypothalamus–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) and –adrenal (HPA) axes. In schizophrenic patients, the switch from neuroleptics to clozapine influences prolactin and cortisol secretion, but there is no information on possible changes on HPG-axis hormones. We measured the plasma levels of testosterone (TST), LH, FSH, as well as of prolactin (PRL) and cortisol (CORT), in a group of male patients with schizophrenia during treatment with classical neuroleptics with no satisfactory therapeutic response (31 pts, age 30.3±8.5, range 18–50), and 6 weeks later, after switch to treatment with clozapine (CLZ) in doses from 100 to 600 mg daily (mean 328 mg). Psychopathology was assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. The hormone levels were also compared to those of a control group of 38 healthy males. Treatment with CLZ resulted in a reduction in the BPRS score by 30% in the mean. Plasma PRL was reduced from 39.9±26.1 to 8.3±5.0 ng/ml (P<0.001), CORT from 150±42 to 118±39 ng/ml (P<0.003), while LH, FSH, and TST remained unaltered. Compared to healthy controls, patients had higher PRL and CORT levels while on neuroleptics, and no significant differences to any of the estimated hormones, after switch to clozapine. The results show that switching from classical neuroleptics to treatment with clozapine does not have any substantial effect on the HPG-axis hormone plasma levels, although it reduces substantially the levels of prolactin and cortisol.     

Effects of atypical neuroleptics on alertness and visual orienting in stabilized schizophrenic patients: a preliminary study

It has been shown that schizophrenic patients treated with conventional neuroleptics display a general slowness in latency in simple reaction-time tasks and a disengagement deficit in visual-orienting tasks. Yet, the influence of atypical neuroleptics on attention is still controversial. The purpose of our study was to investigate the effect of atypical neuroleptics in tasks requiring alertness, selective attention or visual orienting. Thirteen stabilized schizophrenic patients receiving atypical neuroleptics were compared to 13 healthy controls matched for age, gender, and study level, in a choice reaction time (CRT) task and a visual-orienting task cued target detection (CTD) task. The results showed that patients and controls obtained comparable reaction times (RTs) in the CRT task. In the CTD task, both groups had comparable RTs but the presence of invalid cues caused a greater attentional cost in both visual fields for patients compared to controls, indicating a symmetrical disengagement deficit. To conclude, patients treated with atypical neuroleptics had a phasic alertness ability similar to controls. By contrast, an impairment of disengagement was present in those patients. Thus, atypical neuroleptics could have a positive influence on certain but not all attentional domains.