Three-dimensional endoanal sonography in assessing anal canal injury

BACKGROUND: Instrument design limits endosonography of the anal canal to the axial plane, with no capability for longitudinal imaging or measurement. Using three-dimensional reconstructions, the relationship between the radial and linear extent of an anal sphincter tear has been explored, and sex differences in anal canal and sphincter length have been established. METHODS: Three-dimensional reconstructions were performed in 20 controls and 24 patients with faecal incontinence found to have 25 external and five internal sphincter defects. The radial and linear extent of any sphincter tear was measured. In controls the length of the sphincters was compared with the total anal canal length, and the maximum and mean internal sphincter thickness was compared. RESULTS: The radial angle of an internal or external sphincter defect was significantly related to its length (R2 = 96.8 per cent and R2 = 84.4 per cent respectively; both P < 0.001). The anal canal was longer in men than in women (mean(s.d.) 32.6(5.3) versus 25.1(3.4) mm; P < 0.001). The internal anal sphincter was also longer in men (25.6(6.3) versus 19.8(4.0) mm; P < 0.02), but the mean internal sphincter length as a percentage of total anal canal length did not differ (78.3 versus 78.7 per cent; P not significant). The anterior external anal sphincter was longer in men than in women (32.6(5.3) versus 15.3(2.8) mm; P < 0.001), and formed a greater percentage of total anal canal length (100 versus 62.9 per cent; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Multiplanar imaging has revealed a direct relationship between the length of a sphincter tear and its radial extent as shown on axial scanning. Marked sex differences in sphincter configuration have been demonstrated. In women the shorter anterior sphincter length highlights the risk of complete sphincter disruption with extensive tears.     

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures

BACKGROUND: For a fracture classification to be useful it must provide prognostic significance, interobserver reliability, and intraobserver reproducibility. Most studies have found reliability and reproducibility to be poor for fracture classification schemes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Sanders and Crosby-Fitzgibbons classification systems, two commonly used methods for classifying intra-articular calcaneal fractures. METHODS: Twenty-five CT scans of intra-articular calcaneal fractures occurring at one trauma center were reviewed. The CT images were presented to eight observers (two orthopaedic surgery chief residents, two foot and ankle fellows, two fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons, and two fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons) on two separate occasions 8 weeks apart. On each viewing, observers were asked to classify the fractures according to both the Sanders and Crosby-Fitzgibbons systems. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility were assessed with computer-generated kappa statistics (SAS software; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). RESULTS: Total unanimity (eight of eight observers assigned the same fracture classification) was achieved only 24% (six of 25) of the time with the Sanders system and 36% (nine of 25) of the time with the Crosby-Fitzgibbons scheme. Interobserver reliability for the Sanders classification method reached a moderate (kappa = 0.48, 0.50) level of agreement, when the subclasses were included. The agreement level increased but remained in the moderate (kappa = 0.55, 0.55) range when the subclasses were excluded. Interobserver agreement reached a substantial (kappa = 0.63, 0.63) level with the Crosby-Fitzgibbons system. Intraobserver reproducibility was better for both schemes. The Sanders system with subclasses included reached moderate (kappa = 0.57) agreement, while ignoring the subclasses brought agreement into the substantial (kappa = 0.77) range. The overall intraobserver agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.74) for the Crosby-Fitzgibbons system. CONCLUSIONS: Although intraobserver kappa values reached substantial levels and the Crosby-Fitzgibbons system generally showed greater agreement, we were unable to demonstrate excellent interobserver or intraobserver reliability with either classification scheme. While a system with perfect agreement would be impossible, our results indicate that these classifications lack the reproducibility to be considered ideal.     

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification and diagnosis for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine

Purpose

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine has been classified into four types by lateral plain radiographs, but the reliability of the classification and of the diagnosis of either cervical OPLL or cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) was unknown. We investigated the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification and diagnosis for OPLL by radiographs and computed tomography (CT) images.

Methods

A total of 16 observers classified each patient’s images into five groups; OPLL continuous, segmental, mixed, circumscribed type, or CSM. To evaluate interobserver reliability, the observers first classified only radiograph images, and next both radiographs and CT images. On another day they followed the same procedure to evaluate intraobserver reliability. We also evaluated interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the diagnosis of either cervical OPLL or CSM.

Results

Interobserver reliability of the classification with radiographs only showed moderate agreement, but interobserver reliability with both radiographs and CT images showed substantial agreement. Intraobserver of reliability the classification was also improved by additional CT images. Interobserver reliability of the diagnosis with both radiographs and CT images was almost similar to with radiographs only. Intraobserver reliability of the diagnosis was improved by additional CT images.

Conclusions

This study suggested that the reliability of the classification and diagnosis for cervical OPLL was improved by additional CT images. We propose that diagnostic criteria for OPLL include both radiographs and CT images.     

Endoanal ultrasound for detection of sphincter defects following childbirth

Introduction and hypothesis

The objectives of this study were to estimate the rates of sonographically detected anal sphincter defects within 72 h of childbirth and to evaluate intra- and interobserver agreement using three-dimensional (3-D) endoanal sonography data.

Methods

This is a prospective observational study of primiparous women delivered vaginally. Women without clinically identified anal sphincter lacerations underwent endoanal ultrasonography within 72 h of delivery. Intra- and interobserver agreement for diagnosis of sphincter defects using 3-D endoanal sonography data was calculated using kappa statistics.

Results

The rate of sphincter defects in 107 women undergoing 3-D endoanal sonography was 12 %. Characteristics of women with sonographically detected sphincter defects, compared to those without, included a significantly increased rate of clinically diagnosed second-degree lacerations (54 vs 20 %, p 0.008). The intra- and interobserver agreement for diagnosis of sphincter defects using 3-D endoanal sonography data was 0.82 [confidence interval (CI) 0.66–0.99] and 0.72 (CI 0.54–0.92), respectively.

Conclusions

Anal sphincter defects detected using endoanal sonography are common, occurring in 12 % of primiparous women, and are significantly associated with other less severe perineal lacerations. Overall and combining sonographically detected defects with clinically diagnosed lacerations, we estimate that 17.8 % of primiparous women delivered vaginally sustain anal sphincter injuries. The intraobserver agreement for diagnosis of sphincter defects is very good and the interobserver agreement is good.     

What Are the Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Gap and Stepoff Measurements in Acetabular Fractures?

BackgroundGap and stepoff values in the treatment of acetabular fractures are correlated with clinical outcomes. However, the interobserver and intraobserver variability of gap and stepoff measurements for all imaging modalities in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phase of treatment is unknown. Recently, a standardized CT-based measurement method was introduced, which provided the opportunity to assess the level of variability.Questions/purposes(1) In patients with acetabular fractures, what is the interobserver variability in the measurement of the fracture gaps and articular stepoffs determined by each observer to be the maximum one in the weightbearing dome, as measured on pre- and postoperative pelvic radiographs, intraoperative fluoroscopy, and pre- and postoperative CT scans? (2) What is the intraobserver variability in these measurements?MethodsSixty patients with a complete subset of pre-, intra- and postoperative high-quality images (CT slices of < 2 mm), representing a variety of fracture types with small and large gaps and/or stepoffs, were included. A total of 196 patients with nonoperative treatment (n = 117), inadequate available imaging (n = 60), skeletal immaturity (n = 16), bilateral fractures (n = 2) or a primary THA (n = 1) were excluded. The maximum gap and stepoff values in the weightbearing dome were digitally measured on pelvic radiographs and CT images by five independent observers. Observers were free to decide which gap and/or stepoff they considered the maximum and then measure these before and after surgery. The observers were two trauma surgeons with more than 5 years of experience in pelvic surgery, two trauma surgeons with less than 5 years of experience in pelvic surgery, and one surgical resident. Additionally, the final intraoperative fluoroscopy images were assessed for the presence of a gap or stepoff in the weightbearing dome. All observers used the same standardized measurement technique and each observer measured the first five patients together with the responsible researcher. For 10 randomly selected patients, all measurements were repeated by all observers, at least 2 weeks after the initial measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for pelvic radiographs and CT images and the kappa value for intraoperative fluoroscopy measurements were calculated to determine the inter- and intraobserver variability. Interobserver variability was defined as the difference in the measurements between observers. Intraobserver variability was defined as the difference in repeated measurements by the same observer.ResultsPreoperatively, the interobserver ICC was 0.4 (gap and stepoff) on radiographs and 0.4 (gap) and 0.3 (stepoff) on CT images. The observers agreed on the indication for surgery in 40% (gap) and 30% (stepoff) on pelvic radiographs. For CT scans the observers agreed in 95% (gap) and 70% (stepoff) of images. Postoperatively, the interobserver ICC was 0.4 (gap) and 0.2 (stepoff) on radiographs. The observers agreed on whether the reduction was acceptable or not in 60% (gap) and 40% (stepoff). On CT images the ICC was 0.3 (gap) and 0.4 (stepoff). The observers agreed on whether the reduction was acceptable in 35% (gap) and 38% (stepoff). The preoperative intraobserver ICC was 0.6 (gap and stepoff) on pelvic radiographs and 0.4 (gap) and 0.6 (stepoff) for CT scans. Postoperatively, the intraobserver ICC was 0.7 (gap) and 0.1 (stepoff) on pelvic radiographs. On CT the intraobserver ICC was 0.5 (gap) and 0.3 (stepoff). There was no agreement between the observers on the presence of a gap or stepoff on intraoperative fluoroscopy images (kappa -0.1 to 0.2).ConclusionsWe found an insufficient interobserver and intraobserver agreement on measuring gaps and stepoffs for supporting clinical decisions in acetabular fracture surgery. If observers cannot agree on the size of the gap and stepoff, it will be challenging to decide when to perform surgery and study the results of acetabular fracture surgery.Level of EvidenceLevel III, diagnostic study.     

Bensahel et al. and International Clubfoot Study Group evaluation of treated clubfoot: assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability

In order to assess interobserver and intraobserver reliability of an evaluation system of the International Clubfoot Study Group, 30 children treated for unilateral clubfoot and their radiographs were examined by three different observers. The mean intraobserver kappa value was found to be 0.62. The mean interobserver kappa value was 0.73. These kappa values correlated with a substantial degree of agreement. Interobserver reliability for all subgroup evaluations (morphologic, functional and radiological) and total scores was 90% or over. This also indicates a good interobserver reliability. In conclusion, the Bensahel et al. and International Clubfoot Study Group outcome evaluation system may be used reliably for the assessment of outcome of the treatment of clubfoot.     

Measurement error in assessment of vertebral rotation using the Perdriolle torsionmeter.

The Perdriolle torsionmeter assesses vertebral rotation on a spinal radiograph. It is frequently used to measure improvement in spinal derotation following Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for scoliosis. In this study, intraobserver and interobserver measurement error was examined during use of the torsionmeter. Intraobserver error was as follows: 53% of the measurements were accurate to within 5 degrees, and 21% erred greater than 10 degrees. Error from the actual value averaged 6 degrees. Interobserver error was as follows: Among six observers, only one third of the radiographs had measurements within 5 degrees of each other. Another one third erred by more than 10 degrees. Because of this significant intraobserver and interobserver error, precise measurements of rotation using the torsionmeter cannot be expected. Efforts to quantify spinal derotation with the torsionmeter after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation may not be valid.     

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of radiographic evidence of bone healing at osteotomy sites

Plain radiographs are commonly used to evaluate the degree of bone healing after an osteotomy and the application of an external fixator. The purpose of the study was to assess intraobserver and interobserver reliability in determining bone healing, defined as bridging callus across three of four cortices, of osteotomy sites on radiographs. Substantial intraobserver reliability and a high intraobserver percentage agreement were found. Interobserver reliability was moderate and interobserver percentage agreement was less than half for agreement between all involved orthopaedic surgeons. The lower reliability across surgeons suggests that the determination of the extent of the bone healing is subjective.     

Observer variability in the radiographic measurement and classification of metatarsus adductus.

The classification system of Berg was evaluated using four observers and the radiographs of 42 feet from patients with metatarsus adductus. Interobserver disagreement in diagnosis was 36%. Intraobserver inconsistency averaged 26%. The error range for the lateral and anteroposterior talocalcaneal angle measurement was 13.6 and 15.1 degrees intraobserver and 19.8 and 25.2 degrees interobserver, respectively. There was no correlation between classification and the length of time required for cast correction. The irregularity of hindfoot ossification centers makes measurements inconsistent and seriously reduces the usefulness of classification based on such measurements.     

The reliability of measurements taken from computer-stored digitalised x-rays of acute distal radius fractures

Sixteen observers measured eight anatomical parameters on digitalised images of six acute distal radial fractures using the Patient Archiving Communication System software and repeated the measurements at least 2 weeks later. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients and tolerance limits. The highest interobserver agreement was demonstrated in the dorsal tilt (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.858; tolerance limit 14.2 degrees ). When compared with the results of a study looking at observer reliability in measurement of healed distal radial fractures, the reliability of computerised measurements is not significantly different from those achieved by manual techniques (dorsal tilt interobserver tolerance limits on computer system 16 degrees , compared to 15 degrees using ruler and protractor). These results suggest that the recommended radiological reduction limits for distal radius fractures of <10 degrees change in palmar tilt, <2 mm radial shortening, <5 degrees change in radial angle and a <1 to 2 mm articular step cannot be reliably measured.     

Reliability analysis for radiographic measurement of limb length discrepancy: full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph versus scanogram

Patients with limb length discrepancy (LLD) often have associated angular deformities requiring a standing full-length radiograph of the lower limb in addition to a scanogram. The purpose of our study was to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of measuring LLD with both techniques, using computed radiography. The LLD was measured on 70 supine scanograms and standing anteroposterior radiographs of the lower extremity by 5 blinded observers on 2 separate occasions. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and mean absolute difference (in millimeters) was calculated to assess intraobserver and interobserver reliability and found to be excellent for both radiographic techniques. Intraobserver ICC and mean absolute difference was 0.975 to 0.995 and 1.5 to 2.6 mm for scanogram and 0.939 to 0.996 and 1.5 to 4.6 mm for the standing radiograph, respectively. Repeated measurements for both radiographic studies were within 5 mm of the first measurement greater than 90% and within 10 mm greater than 95% of times. Interobserver ICC and mean absolute difference was 0.979 and 2.6 mm for scanogram and 0.968 and 3.0 mm for the standing radiograph. The reliability was excellent irrespective of age, sex, and underlying diagnosis other than Blount disease, which had good reliability. A standing anteroposterior radiograph of the lower extremity should be the imaging modality of choice when evaluating patients with limb length inequality who may have angular deformities because it allows a comprehensive evaluation of the extremity and is as reliable as a scanogram for measuring LLD. This approach may decrease the radiation exposure and financial burden involved in assessing patients with unequal limb lengths.     

Observer Variability of Iliac Artery Measurements in Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Accurate measurement of iliac arteries is essential for successful delivery of aortic endografts without iliac limb endoleak. Although intravascular ultrasound measurements may be reliable, they require an invasive procedure. Therefore, helical computed tomography (hCT) has become the most commonly used modality for obtaining preprocedure arterial diameter measurements. The accuracy of hCT remains ill-defined, however, because an anatomic gold standard with which to compare the measurements is not available. We therefore assessed inter- and intraobserver variability of hCT measurements. We also applied accepted cutoff measurements to determine the clinical impact of observer variability in predicting the need for adjunctive iliac access and iliac limb seal procedures. hCT scans were analyzed in 30 patients who had undergone successful placement of a bifurcated endograft (26 Ancure, 4 Aneurex). Mean age of patients was 75 years, the male/female ratio was 27:3. Three blinded observers measured transverse diameters (maximal aortic aneurysm [Amax], narrowest infrarenal aortic neck [Amin], maximal common iliac [Imax], and narrowest iliac artery [Imin]). Inter- and intraobserver variability was calculated as standard deviation of mean pair differences according to the method of Bland and Altman. The true incidence of adjunctive procedures to facilitate delivery of the device into the aorta and ensure iliac limb seal was compared with that predicted by the observers to obtain sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the measurements. Interobserver variability of iliac measurements was higher than intraobserver variability (p < 0.05). Interobserver variability of Amax ranged from 4.37 to 10.73% of the mean Amax. Conversely, variability of Amin was 8.91-18.89%, that of Imax was 12.11-22.23%, and that of Imin was 10.51-18.73% (p < 0.05 vs. Amax). Therefore, interobserver variability influenced aortic neck and iliac diameter twice as much as it did aneurysm measurements. To successfully place 30 endografts we performed 8 adjunctive access procedures (4 angioplasties, 4 common iliac artery conduits) and 17 adjunctive procedures in 60 limbs to ensure limb seal (9 unilateral IIA coil embolizations, 8 stents). We used 8.5 (Ancure) and 8.0 (Aneurex) mm as lower limits of acceptability for uncomplicated access, and 13.4 (Ancure) and 16 (Aneurex) mm as the upper limits of acceptability for uncomplicated iliac limb seal. These limits were applied to measurements from the three observers to predict need for adjunctive access or iliac seal procedures in this cohort. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of these observer measurements for a need to perform additional access procedures were 0.67, 0.80, 0.55, and 0.87; the same values for a need to perform additional seal procedures were 0.71, 0.74, 0.52, and 0.86, respectively. Interobserver variability was approximately 20% of measured iliac diameter. This explains why helical CT measurements were noted to have low PPV in predicting the need for an adjunctive access or limb seal procedure. These data establish PPV and NPV for hCT and provide objective evidence for the need to improve iliac artery imaging. Until more accurate imaging becomes available, we recommend oversizing of iliac limbs by 10-20% in patients with wide landing zones and that surgeons be prepared to resolve unexpected iliac artery access or seal problems intraoperatively.Presented at the 13th Annual Winter Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Steamboat Springs, CO, January 31-February 2, 2004.     

Is three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction justified before endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?

OBJECTIVES: The endovascular management of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) relies on accurate preoperative imaging for proper patient selection and operative planning. Three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT) with reformatted images perpendicular to blood flow has gained popularity as a method of AAA assessment and image-based planning before endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The current study was undertaken to determine the interobserver agreement of AAA measurements obtained with axial CT and reformatted 3-D CT and to compare the consistency of the 2 methods in selecting patients for EVAR. METHODS: Eight observers assessed the axial CT and reformatted 3-D CT scans for 5 patients with AAAs to determine whether the patients were candidates for EVAR. 3-D CT with multiplanar reformatted images was performed by Medical Media Systems (MMS). Each observer measured the length and diameter of the proximal neck, maximal AAA, aortic bifurcation, common iliac diameter, and aortic angulation. The proximal neck and common iliac arteries were also assessed for thrombus, calcification, and tortuosity. Agreement of the measurements on axial CT scans was compared with those on MMS CT scans by calculating the kappa statistic. Complete agreement was defined as kappa = 1.0. The limits of agreement between observers were also calculated. RESULTS: The cumulative interobserver agreement of MMS CT scans (kappa =.81) was greater than for axial CT scans (kappa =.59). The kappa value for each of the diameter measurements was greater with the MMS CT scans. In 79% of cases the observers' measurements were less than 2 mm from the mean with MMS CT, compared with 59% for axial CT. The kappa value for deciding whether a patient was an endograft candidate on the basis of aortic neck was greater with the MMS CT (0.92 vs 0.63). The limits of agreement between observers were also better with the MMS CT. CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver agreement in planning EVAR is significantly better with MMS CT compared with traditional axial CT. The routine use of MMS CT appears justified before EVAR to improve the accuracy and consistency of patient selection.     

Intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of cervical spine measurements

Lateral flexion-extension radiographs of 72 patients with Down syndrome were used to assess the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the atlanto-dens interval, Wiesel-Rothman measurement, occiput atlas angle, and Power's ratio in flexion and extension. The radiographs were reviewed by three blinded observers on three different occasions with at least a 1-month interval between assessments. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure the reproducibility of the measurements from a given observer and the reliability between different observers. With the exception of observer one, the atlanto-dens interval had a statistically significant intraobserver agreement compared with any of the other measurements (p < 0.05). The atlanto-dens interval and the Wiesel-Rothman measurements tended to have better correlation between observers, although there was only fair agreement. The agreement, however, was statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with Power's ratio. The degree of intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability may make it difficult to base treatment protocols on these measurements.     

Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of powers ratio for assessment of atlanto-occipital junction: comparison of plain radiography and computed tomography

Powers ratio, as assessed on plain radiographs or computed tomography (CT) images, appears to have clinical and prognostic value. To date, the validation of this assessment tool has been limited to a small number of observers at a single site. No study has examined the intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the Powers ratio measurement on plain radiographs or CT images among a large cohort of spine surgeons. This type of validation is critical to allow for the broader use of the Powers ratio methodology in research studies and clinical applications. Plain radiographs and spiral CT images of the cervical spine of 32 patients were assessed, and the Powers ratio was determined by five spine surgeons. Each surgeon performed three readings, 7 months apart. In the first round of measurements, the observers used only the Powers’ method of instruction. The second and third measurement sets were obtained after an interactive teaching session on the methodology. The order of the images was altered for the second and third set of measurements. The coefficient of variation (Cv) was calculated to determine the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reliability for each imaging technique. A Bland-Altman plot was then used to assess the agreement between the two imaging techniques. For interobserver reliability, the mean Cv of the Powers ratio was 9.09 and 4.31% for plain radiographs and CT, respectively. The Cv mean value for intraobserver reproducibility averaged 4.95% (range 1.39–9.08) when CT scans were used and 14.17% (range 7.54–34.30) when plain radiographs were used. For intraobserver reproducibility, the lowest and highest Cv mean value of five raters was 1.39 and 9.08% using CT scans and 7.54 and 34.3% using plain radiographs. The Bland-Altman plot, demonstrated that the two methods were in close agreement on the −0.8 and 0.89% interval for limits of agreement (bias ± 1.96σ). The intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of Powers ratio measurement was acceptable (<5%) with CT scans but not with plain radiographs. However, despite the statistically inferior reliability and repeatability, the Bland-Altman plot analysis showed that given the −0.8 and 0.89% limits of agreement, the two methods may be used interchangeably in clinical practice.     

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of therapist-assisted videotaped evaluations of upper-limb hemiplegia

PURPOSE: Therapist-assisted videotaped sessions have been used to augment physical examinations in the evaluation of hand and arm function in patients with spastic hemiplegia. The purpose of this study was to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of standardized videotaped examinations in the evaluation and functional classification of these patients. METHODS: Three examiners reviewed standardized videotaped examinations of 10 adolescents with spastic hemiplegia on 2 separate occasions. All 10 patients were under consideration for surgical intervention for their upper-extremity dysfunction. Videotapes were used to assess upper-extremity range of motion, finger and thumb deformity, and reach, pinch, and grip function. Upper-extremity function was graded according to the House and Mowery classification systems. Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were measured with the kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Range of motion, deformity, and upper-extremity functional strategy assessment showed slight to excellent interobserver reliability and good to almost perfect intraobserver reliability. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the consolidated House classification system was more reliable than the Mowery or standard House classification systems. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluations of standardized videotaped examinations in patients with hemiplegia were reliable between and among observers. Such therapist-assisted videotaped evaluations may provide useful data for clinical decision-making and multicenter outcomes studies in patients with upper-extremity involvement with spastic hemiplegia.     

The reliability of measurements of the lumbar spine using ultrasound B-scan

Diagnostic ultrasound is used in research and clinical settings to determine the size of the lumbar spinal canal. When the technique was first introduced, measurements were obtained directly from an A-scan while concurrently viewing a B-scan. However, measurements obtained directly from a B-scan are now commonly used despite the undetermined reliability of the technique. To determine the reliability, 50 randomly selected ultrasound B-scan examinations were read on two separate occasions by three investigators. For each spinal level, the mean intraobserver error (same investigator), from the first to the second reading was determined, as was the interobserver error (between investigators) and the error due to variability in obtaining the ultrasound images. The resultant errors were approximately double those reported previously for the technique using A-scan. Interobserver variations were the major source of measurement error.     

Reliability of the quadriceps angle measurement

The quadriceps angle (Q-angle) is used to determine patellofemoral alignment. Although this measurement has been used to evaluate and treat patellofemoral joint pathology, few studies have examined its reliability. This study evaluated the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Q-angle measurement. To investigate the interobserver reliability of the Q-angle, 25 individuals of varying levels of training served as observers and participants as each measured the other 24 participants. To investigate the intraobserver reliability of the Q-angle, 3 of the observers measured 13 of the participants an additional 2 times. Additionally, clinically derived Q-angle measurements were compared with radiographically derived measurements. The reliability analysis was performed using intraclass correlation coefficients. For interobserver measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.17-0.29 for the four variables evaluated (right and left, extension and flexion). For intraobserver measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.14-0.37. The average intraclass correlation coefficient between the clinically and radiographically derived measurements ranged from 0.13-0.32. This study demonstrates poor interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Q-angle measurement and poor correlation between clinically and radiographically derived Q-angles.     

Computed tomography scanning of intra-articular distal radius fractures: does it influence treatment?

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the addition of computed tomography (CT) results in changes in the evaluation and treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures. Fifteen intra-articular distal radius fractures were evaluated independently by 4 hand surgeons. Plain x-rays were reviewed initially followed by the corresponding CT scans for comparison of articular step-off and gapping, comminution, and treatment. Kappa coefficients (kappa) of intraobserver and interobserver reliability for treatment plans were generated. Computed tomography scans improved the sensitivity of measurement of articular surface gapping, improved the accuracy of detection of comminution and distal radioulnar joint involvement, and altered proposed treatment plans within observers (intraobserver agreement: kappa =.54, moderate) and improved agreement of proposed treatment plans between observers (kappa =.34 to kappa =.44, fair to moderate). Computed tomography scanning influenced observers to change treatment plans and resulted in increased interobserver reliability in the proposed management of these injuries.     

Both scanning plane and observer affect measurements of scaphoid deformity

PURPOSE: The influence of angular deformity of the scaphoid on wrist function and arthrosis is debated and the reliability of the described quantitative measurements of deformity has been questioned. We hypothesized that the inherent imprecision with which computed tomography scanning planes are selected introduces another source of variability in measurements of scaphoid deformity, further diminishing their reliability. METHODS: Sagittal plane images of 15 computed tomograms of normal scaphoids were evaluated in 3 different reconstruction planes. Four observers measured the lateral intrascaphoid angle, the dorsal cortical angle, and the height-to-length ratio of the 45 images in random order and then measured them again in a distinct random order 2 weeks later. The variability of each observer's measurements (intraobserver reliability) was evaluated with Pearson correlation coefficients. The agreement of the measurements made by the 4 observers (interobserver reliability) and the agreement of the measurements of the same bone in different reconstruction planes (interplane reliability) were evaluated using interclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The intraobserver reliability was poor for 27 of 36 comparisons. The interobserver reliability of the dorsal cortical angle and the intrascaphoid angle was poor for all reconstruction planes. The interobserver reliability of the height-to-length ratio was good for 2 planes and poor for the third plane. The interplane reliability was poor for 7 of 12 comparisons, with no single measurement technique remaining consistent for all observers across reconstruction planes. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative measurements of scaphoid deformity have very limited reliability for individual observers, between different observers, and depending on the plane in which the image of the scaphoid is produced. Even the most reliable measure of deformity (height-to-length ratio) was not consistent between reconstruction planes. Unless more reliable scanning and measurement techniques are developed ideas about the effect of scaphoid deformity on wrist function will remain to a large degree speculative.