Participation of a concealed atriohisian tract in the reentrant circuit of the slow-fast type of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: The retrograde fast pathway in typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) exhibits marked variation in its electrophysiologic properties. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the retrograde fast pathway and localize the lower turnaround site of the reentrant circuit in typical AVNRT. METHODS: Seventy-four patients with typical AVNRT were divided into two groups according to the response of the retrograde fast pathway to intravenous administration of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) during ventricular pacing: ATP-S [n = 47 (63.5%)] with and ATP-R without [n = 27 (36.5%)] His-atrial (H-A) block. H-A intervals were measured from the most proximal His-bundle electrogram to the earliest atrial activation during the tachycardia (HAt) and entrainment pacing from the parahisian right ventricular region (HAe). It was postulated that the HAt was the difference in conduction time between the lower common pathway (x) and retrograde fast pathway (y) (HAt = y - x), whereas HAe was the sum of the two (HAe = y + x). Hence, x = (HAe-HAt)/2. x >0 suggested the presence of a lower common pathway, whereas x <0 suggested the absence of a lower common pathway and lower turnaround site within the His bundle. RESULTS: x was significantly smaller in ATP-R than ATP-S (-6 +/- 5 vs 4 +/- 4 ms, P <.05) and was <0 in 23 (85%) of 27 ATP-R patients. The maximal increment in H-A interval during ventricular pacing was significantly longer in ATP-S than ATP-R (35 +/- 33 vs 2 +/- 2 ms, P <.05). CONCLUSION: A concealed atriohisian tract totally bypassing the atrioventricular node constituted the retrograde fast pathway in one third of all typical AVNRT cases.     

Atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with eccentric coronary sinus activation: electrophysiological characteristics and essential effects of left-sided ablation inside the coronary sinus.

BACKGROUND: The precise electrophysiological characteristics and essential effects of left-sided ablation in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with eccentric coronary sinus (CS) activation (ECSA) have not been described. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the tachycardia characteristics and essential effects of left-sided ablation in AVNRT with ECSA. METHODS: Electrophysiological and ablation data were reviewed in 340 patients with all forms of AVNRT. RESULTS: Among 360 AVNRTs in the 340 patients, there were 23 atypical AVNRTs (6%; 12 slow-slow and 11 fast-slow) in 18 (5%) patients who exhibited ECSA with the earliest retrograde atrial activation 11 +/- 5 mm inside the CS. The patients with ECSA during the tachycardia were significantly younger than those without (38 +/- 18 vs. 51 +/- 18 years; P<.01). The presence of upper (UCP) and lower common pathways (LCP) was suggested in three (17%) and 18 (100%) patients, respectively. An ablation exclusively targeting the earliest retrograde atrial activation inside the CS eliminated the tachycardias with the elimination (n = 12) or modification of the left-sided slow pathway (SP) conduction (n = 6) without any complications. The entire reentrant circuit was considered to reside on the left side in two patients (11%) because the bidirectional SP conduction was simultaneously eliminated after the ablation inside the CS. CONCLUSIONS: Atypical AVNRT with ECSA involved the left-sided SP as a retrograde limb, and the reentrant circuit was more frequently associated with evidence that suggested a UCP and LCP. Ablation exclusively targeting the earliest retrograde atrial activation inside the CS was highly effective in this entity.     

"Left-variant" atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: electrophysiological characteristics and effect of slow pathway ablation within coronary sinus

Introduction: Recent anatomical and electrophysiological studies have demonstrated the presence of leftward posterior nodal extension (LPNE); however, its role in the genesis of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is poorly understood. This study was performed to characterize successful slow pathway (SP) ablation site and to elucidate the role of LPNE in genesis of atypical AVNRT with eccentric activation patterns within the coronary sinus (CS).
Methods and Results: Among 45 patients with atypical AVNRT (slow-slow/fast-slow/both = 20/22/3 patients) with concentric (n = 37, 82%) or eccentric CS activation (n = 8, 18%), successful ablation site was evaluated. Among 35/37 patients (95%) with concentric CS activation, ablation at the conventional SP region outside CS eliminated both retrograde SP conduction and AVNRT inducibility. Among eight patients with eccentric CS activation, the earliest retrograde atrial activation was found at proximal CS 16 ± 4 mm distal to the ostium during AVNRT. The earliest retrograde activation site was located at inferior to inferoseptal mitral annulus, consistent with the presumed location of LPNE. Ablation at the conventional SP region with electroanatomical approach only rendered AVNRT nonsustained without elimination of retrograde SP conduction in seven of eight patients (88%). Ablation targeted to the earliest retrograde atrial activation site within proximal CS (15 ± 4 mm distal to the ostium); however, eliminated retrograde SP conduction and rendered AVNRT noninducible in six of eight patients (75%).
Conclusion: In 75% of "left-variant" atypical AVNRT, ablation within proximal CS was required to eliminate eccentric retrograde SP conduction and render AVNRT noninducible, suggesting LPNE formed retrograde limb of reentrant circuit.     

从慢慢型和慢快型房室结折返性心动过速电生理特性的差异分析折返环的不同

目的从慢慢型房室结折返性心动过速（AVNRT）和慢快型AVNRT的电生理特性的差异分析两型AVNRT间折返环的不同.方法在500例AVNRT患者中的59例慢慢型和60例慢快型之间,比较部分电生理特性的异同;同时在部分慢慢型和慢快型患者中应用2种方法（1）比较起搏时和心动过速时的HA间期的长度;（2）比较心动过速时心室刺激重整心动过速的不同.比较下传共径（LCP）的异同.结果慢慢型的前传慢径和逆传慢径有明显不同的传导时间;慢慢型的逆传慢径与慢快型的逆传快径有明显不同的传导时间和递减特性;和慢快型相比,2种方法均显示慢慢型有较长的LCP.结论 （1）慢慢型AVNRT中前传慢径和逆传慢径的传导时间明显不同;慢慢型较慢快型有较长的下传共径;（2）研究结果支持慢慢型AVNRT可能应用房室结的右侧后延伸和左侧后延伸分别形成心动过速的前传和逆传支而形成折返.     

Retrograde slow pathway conduction in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia.

AIMS: To study retrograde slow pathway conduction by means of right- and left-sided septal mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nineteen patients with slow-fast atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) were studied before and after slow pathway ablation. Simultaneous His bundle recordings from right and left sides of the septum, using trans-aortic and trans-septal electrodes, were made during right ventricular pacing. Pre-ablation, decremental retrograde ventriculo-atrial (VA) conduction without jumps or discontinuities was recorded in eight patients (group 1). In six patients, retrograde conduction jumps were demonstrated (group 2) and in the remaining four patients, there was minimal prolongation of stimulus to atrium (St-A) intervals (group 3). The maximal difference (Delta St-A) between St-A intervals obtained with pacing at a constant cycle length of 500 ms and at the cycle length with maximal retrograde VA prolongation was significantly longer measured from the right His compared with the left His (122 +/- 25 vs. 110 +/- 33 ms, P = 0.02, respectively) in group 1 and group 2 (140 +/- 23 vs. 110 +/- 35 ms, P = 0.03), but not in group 3 (10 +/- 4 vs. 13 +/- 8 ms, P = 0.35). Post-ablation, Delta St-A intervals were similar between right and left His recordings (77 +/- 37 vs. 76 +/- 33 ms, P = 0.53, respectively) in group 1, (100 +/- 24 vs. 103 +/- 21 ms, P = 0.35) group 2, and (63 +/- 32 vs. 66 +/- 33 ms, P = 0.35) group 3. CONCLUSION: In patients with typical AVNRT, retrograde conduction through the slow pathway results in earliest retrograde atrial activation on the left side of the septum and catheter ablation in the right inferoparaseptal area abolishes this pattern. These findings are compatible with the concept of slow pathway conduction by means of the inferior AV nodal extensions.     

Slow-fast form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with eccentric retrograde left-sided activation

A case of atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with eccentric retrograde left-sided activation, masquerading as tachycardia using a left-sided accessory pathway, is reported. Initially, it appeared that the tachycardia was a typical slow-fast form of AVNRT. The earliest retrograde activation, however, was registered at a site approximately 3 cm from the coronary sinus orifice (left atrial free wall), indicating atypical AVNRT. Atrial tachycardia and orthodromic AV reciprocating tachycardia using an accessory AV pathway were excluded. Slow pathway ablation at the posteroseptal right atrium eliminated the tachycardia. It was suggested that the anterograde limb of the tachycardia circuit was a slow AV nodal pathway with typical posteroseptal location, whereas the retrograde limb was a long atrionodal pathway connecting the compact AV node and the left atrial free wall near the mid-coronary sinus.     

Para-Hisian entrainment: a novel pacing maneuver to differentiate orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia from atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

INTRODUCTION: Para-Hisian pacing during sinus rhythm can help to identify the presence of an accessory pathway (AP). In this maneuver, the retrograde activation time and pattern are compared during capture and loss-of-capture of the His bundle while pacing from a para-Hisian position. However, identification of a retrograde AP does not necessitate that it is operative during the tachycardia of interest; conversely, slowly conducting or "distant" bypass tracts may not be identified. We evaluated the utility of entrainment or resetting of tachycardias from the para-Hisian position to help distinguish atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from orthodromic atrioventricular tachycardia (AVRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Para-Hisian entrainment/resetting was evaluated in 50 patients: 33 with AVNRT and 17 with AVRT. The maneuvers were performed using a standard quadripolar catheter placed at the His position: low output for right ventricular (RV) capture and high output for both RV and His capture. The retrograde atrial activation sequence, SA interval (interval from stimulus to earliest retrograde atrial activation), and "local" VA interval (interval between the ventricular and atrial electrograms at the site of earliest retrograde atrial activation) were compared between His and His/RV capture. The DeltaSA was > 40 ms in patients with AVNRT and was < 40 ms in all but one patient with AVRT. In concert with the DeltaSA interval, the DeltaVA interval was able to fully define the mechanism of the tachycardia in all patients studied. CONCLUSION: Para-Hisian entrainment/resetting can determine the course of retrograde conduction operative during narrow complex tachycardias. It is a useful diagnostic maneuver in differentiating AVNRT and orthodromic AVRT.     

Heterogeneity of anterograde fast-pathway and retrograde slow-pathway conduction patterns in patients with the fast–slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: electrophysiologic and electrocardiographic considerations

Objectives. This study sought to define the electrophysiologic and electrocardiographic characteristics of fast–slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).Background. In fast–slow AVNRT the retrograde slow pathway (SP) is located in the posterior septum, whereas the anterograde fast pathway (FP) is located in the anterior septum; however, exceptions may occur.Methods. Twelve patients with fast–slow AVNRT were studied. To determine the location of the retrograde SP, atrial activation during AVNRT was examined while recording the electrograms from the low septal right atrium (LSRA) on the His bundle electrogram and the orifice of the coronary sinus (CS). Further, to investigate the location of the anterograde FP, single extrastimuli were delivered during AVNRT both from the high right atrium and the CS.Results. The CS activation during AVNRT preceded the LSRA in six patients (posterior type); LSRA activation preceded the CS in three patients (anterior type), and in the remaining three both sites were activated simultaneously (middle type). In the anterior type, CS stimulation preexcited the His and the ventricle without capturing the LSRA electrogram (atrial dissociation between the CS and the LSRA), suggesting that the anterograde FP was located posterior to the retrograde SP. In the posterior and middle types, high right atrial stimulation demonstrated atrial dissociation, suggesting that the anterograde FP was located anterior to the SP. In the posterior and middle types, retrograde P waves in the inferior leads were deeply negative, whereas they were shallow in the anterior type.Conclusions. Fast–slow AVNRT was able to be categorized into posterior, middle and anterior types according to the site of the retrograde SP. The anterior type AVNRT, where an anteriorly located SP is used in the retrograde direction and a posteriorly located FP in the anterograde direction, appears to represent an anatomical reversal of the posterior type which uses a posterior SP for retrograde and an anterior FP for anterograde conduction. Anterior type AVNRT should be considered in the differential diagnosis of long RP (RP > PR intervals) tachycardias with shallow negative P waves in the inferior leads.     

Patient with atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia with eccentric retrograde left-sided activation: treatment with radiofrequency catheter ablation

We describe a patient with supraventricular tachycardia with triple atrioventricular (AV) node pathway physiology. A discontinuous curve was present in the antegrade AV nodal function curves. During right ventricular pacing, the earliest retrograde atrial activation was recorded at the left-sided coronary sinus electrode. The retrograde ventricular-atrial interval was long and had decremental conduction. We induced a slow-slow AV node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with eccentric retrograde left-sided activation. After slow pathway ablation, dual AV nodal pathway physiology was present. AVNRT with eccentric retrograde left-sided activation is relatively rare, and our findings suggest that eccentric retrograde left-sided atrial inputs consist partially of a slow pathway and disappear with slow pathway ablation.     

Atrial activation during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: studies on retrograde fast pathway conduction.

BACKGROUND: Detailed right and left septal mapping of retrograde atrial activation during typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) has not been undertaken and may provide insight into the complex physiology of AVNRT, especially the anatomic localization of the fast and slow pathways. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the pattern of retrograde atrial activation during typical AVNRT by means of right-sided and left-sided septal mapping and implementation of pacing maneuvers for separating atrial and ventricular electrograms recorded during tachycardia. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with slow-fast AVNRT were studied by means of simultaneous His-bundle recordings from the right and left sides of the septum. Patterns of retrograde atrial activation were recorded during tachycardia following specific pacing maneuvers and during right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing at the tachycardia cycle length. RESULTS: The pattern of retrograde atrial activation could be mapped in 17 of 22 patients during AVNRT. In 9 (53%) patients, the earliest retrograde atrial activation was recorded on the left side of the septum, in 3 (17%) patients on the right side, and in 5 (29%) patients both right and left atrial septal electrograms occurred simultaneously. Stimulus to atrial electrogram times recorded during RVA pacing in 14 patients were 138.5 ms from the right His bundle, 134.5 ms from the left His bundle, and 148.0 ms from the ostium of the coronary sinus (P <.001). The predominant site of earliest retrograde atrial activation during RVA pacing was the left side of the septum (10 patients [71%]). Only 8 (57%) of 14 patients demonstrated concordance in the pattern of retrograde atrial activation during AVNRT and RVA pacing. CONCLUSION: Earliest retrograde atrial activation during AVNRT is most often recorded on the left side of the septum. Breakthrough of atrial activation may be discordant from that observed during RVA pacing.     

从慢径消融发生的交界区心律试探房室结双径的本质

７６例慢－快型房室结折返性心动过速（ＡＶＮＲＴ）患者接受房室结慢径消融术。６５例慢径阻断、９例双径存在但ＡＶＮＲＴ不能诱发、２例快径阻断。慢径阻断后，除快径的前传有效不应期（ＥＲＰ）缩短（２８７．０±７９．０ｍｓｖｓ３４４．０±８７．０ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０１）外，房室传导的文氏点、２１阻滞点、室房传导的１１点、快径逆传ＥＲＰ、前传和逆传功能不应期均无明显改变。共放电８４１次，其中无交界区心律的３１７次放电，无一次消融成功。６５例慢径阻断者，交界区心律减少或消失。以上结果提示快径和慢径可能是两条各具电生理特性的传导纤维。     

Reliability of retrograde atrial activation patterns during ventricular pacing for localizing accessory pathways

Definitive localization of accessory pathways is based on atrial activation patterns during orthodromic supraventricular tachycardia when retrograde conduction occurs exclusively through the accessory pathway. In some patients, supraventricular tachycardia cannot be induced or is deleterious. To determine whether accessory pathway sites can be identified accurately during ventricular pacing, retrograde atrial activation was assessed during orthodromic supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular pacing at multiple cycle lengths in 41 patients with a single accessory pathway. To obviate retrograde fusion due to concomitant conduction through the normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction system that may obscure the location of the accessory pathway, the difference in conduction time from the site of earliest atrial activation to the His bundle atrial electrogram (delta A-SVT) was measured during orthodromic supraventricular tachycardia and compared with values observed during ventricular pacing (delta A-VP). Characteristic values for the delta A-SVT interval were identified for left lateral (66 +/- 17 ms), left posterior (50 +/- 8 ms), posteroseptal (33 +/- 7 ms), right free wall (22 +/- 15 ms) and anteroseptal (0 +/- 0 ms) accessory pathway sites. During ventricular pacing, the site with the earliest atrial electrogram was used to define the accessory pathway location only if the maximal value of the delta A-VP interval over the range of cycle lengths assessed was comparable with the value of the delta A-SVT interval characteristic of that region. Values of the delta A-SVT interval correlated closely with the maximal values of the delta A-VP interval (r = 0.91). With this approach, 40 (98%) of 41 accessory pathway sites were identified correctly during ventricular pacing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Atrial tachycardia with slow pathway conduction mimicking typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

A 68-year-old woman with palpitations underwent electrophysiologic testing. During burst atrial pacing the PR interval exceeded the RR interval and induced a supraventricular tachycardia consistent with a typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway during the tachycardia immediately produced 2 : 1 AV conduction. After slow AV nodal pathway ablation an atrial tachycardia (AT) remained inducible with the earliest atrial activation around the HB region. Radiofrequency ablation at the site of earliest atrial activation interrupted the AT without AV block. AT originating from the HB region with slow pathway conduction may mimic typical AVNRT.     

Electrophysiologic Characteristics and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia with Second-Degree Atrioventricular Block

Second-Degree AV Block During AVNRT. Introduction : Detailed electrophysiologic study of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with 2:1 AV block has been limited.
Methods and Results : Six hundred nine consecutive patients with AVNRT underwent electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway. Twenty-six patients with 2:1 AV block during AVNRT were designated as group I, und those without this particular finding were designated as group II. The major findings of the present study were: (1) group I patients had better anterograde and retrograde AV nodal function, shorter tachycardia cycle length (during tachycardia with 1:1 conduction) (307 ± 30 vs 360 ± 58 msec, P < 0.001), and higher incidence of transient bundle branch block during tachycardia (18/26 vs 43/609, P < 0.001) than group II patients: (2) 21 (80.8%) group I patients had alternans of AA intervals during AVNRT with 2:1 AV block. Longer AH intervals (264 ± 26 vs 253 ± 27 msec, P = 0.031) were associated with the blocked beats. However, similar HA intervals (51 ± 12 vs 50 ± 12 msec, P = 0.363) and similar HV intervals (53 ± 11 vs 52 ± 12, P = 0.834) were found in the blocked and conducted beats; (3) ventricular extrastimulation before or during the His-bundle refractory period bundle could convert 2:1 AV block to 1:1 AV conduction.
Conclusions : Fast reentrant circuit, rather than underlying impaired conduction of the distal AV node or infranodal area, might account for second-degree AV block during AVNRT. Slow pathway ablation is safe and effective in patients who have AVNRT with 2:1 AV block.     

Unique electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with different ventriculoatrial block patterns: Effects of slow pathway ablation and insights into the location of the reentrant circuit

BACKGROUND: The electrophysiologic mechanisms of different ventriculoatrial (VA) block patterns during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize AVNRTs with different VA block patterns and to assess the effects of slow pathway ablation. METHODS: Electrophysiologic data from six AVNRT patients with different VA block patterns were reviewed. RESULTS: All AVNRTs were induced after a sudden AH "jump-up" with the earliest retrograde atrial activation at the right superoparaseptum. Different VA block patterns comprised Wenckebach His-atrial (HA) block (n = 4), 2:1 HA block (n = 1), and variable HA conduction times during fixed AVNRT cycle length (CL) (n = 1). Wenckebach HA block during AVNRT was preceded by gradual HA interval prolongation with fixed His-His (HH) interval and unchanged atrial activation sequence. AVNRT with 2:1 HA block was induced after slow pathway ablation for slow-slow AVNRT with 1:1 HA conduction, and earliest atrial activation shifted from right inferoparaseptum to superoparaseptum without change in AVNRT CL. The presence of a lower common pathway was suggested by a longer HA interval during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL than during AVNRT (n = 5) or Wenckebach HA block during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL (n = 1). In four patients, HA interval during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL was unusually long (188 +/- 30 ms). Ablations at the right inferoparaseptum rendered AVNRT noninducible in 5 (83%) of 6 patients. CONCLUSION: Most AVNRTs with different VA block patterns were amenable to classic slow pathway ablation. The reentrant circuit could be contained within a functionally protected region around the AV node and posterior nodal extensions, and different VA block patterns resulted from variable conduction at tissues extrinsic to the reentrant circuit.     

Mechanism of induction of atrioventricular node reentry by simultaneous anterograde conduction over the fast and slow pathways

INTRODUCTION: AV node reentry (AVNRT) is typically induced with anterograde (Ant) block over the fast pathway (FP) and conduction over the slow pathway (SP), with subsequent retrograde (Ret) conduction over the FP. Rarely, a premature atrial complex (PAC) conducts simultaneously over the FP and SP to induce AVNRT (2 for 1). This study investigates the mechanism of 2 for 1 induction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 192 consecutive patients (pts) undergoing posteroseptal radiofrequency ablation to treat AVNRT, 4 pts (2%) had 2 for 1 AVNRT induction. All needed isoproterenol for AVNRT initiation, and Ant conduction was over the SP during AVNRT. Controls (n = 15) were randomly selected from the remaining 188 pts and required isoproterenol to induce AVNRT with Ant block over the FP. For 2 for 1 versus control, respectively, there was no difference in mean age (55 vs. 46 yr), AVNRT cycle length (420 vs. 320 ms), or the Ant effective refractory period of the FP (320 vs. 344 ms). Of note, the PAC that induced AVNRT had a significantly longer AH interval over the SP in pts with 2 for 1 versus control (470 vs. 320 ms, P = 0.016), even though the A1A2 interval for induction was longer for 2 for 1 (315 vs. 260 ms, P = 0.003). Ret conduction over the SP was relatively poor in the 2 for 1 group as evidenced by 4/4 pts with induction of AVNRT during incremental ventricular pacing versus only 1/15 control pts (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The unique induction of AVNRT by a PAC with simultaneous conduction over the FP and SP is best explained by minimal to no retrograde invasion of the SP from the anterogradely conducted fast pathway impulse, and consistent with this observation is the initiation of slow/fast AVN reentry during incremental RV pacing.     

Electrophysiological mechanisms of conversion of typical to atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia occurring after radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway

This report presents an adult patient with conversion of typical to atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) after slow pathway ablation. Application of radiofrequency energy (3 times) in the posteroseptal region changed the pattern of the atrioventricular (AV) node conduction curve from discontinuous to continuous, but did not change the continuous retrograde conduction curve. After ablation of the slow pathway, atrial extrastimulation induced atypical AVNRT. During tachycardia, the earliest atrial activation site changed from the His bundle region to the coronary sinus ostium. One additional radiofrequency current applied 5 mm upward from the initial ablation site made atypical AVNRT noninducible. These findings suggest that the mechanism of atypical AVNRT after slow pathway ablation is antegrade fast pathway conduction along with retrograde conduction through another slow pathway connected with the ablated antegrade slow pathway at a distal site. The loss of concealed conduction over the antegrade slow pathway may play an important role in the initiation of atypical AVNRT after slow pathway ablation.     

Anterograde slow pathway is not the same as retrograde slow pathway conducted in the reverse direction in patients with uncommon atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine the location of anterograde and retrograde slow pathways in 16 patients with uncommon atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), including the fast-slow form in 10, slow-slow form in 5, and both fast-slow and slow-slow forms in 1. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were divided into two groups according to the approach used for slow pathway ablation in the initial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA): one approach used earliest atrial activation during tachycardia (ES group, n = 9), and the other used a slow potential during sinus rhythm (SP group, n = 7). When the initial RFCA failed to eliminate slow pathway conduction in the ES group, an additional RFCA guided by a slow potential was performed. The ratio of lengths from the His-bundle region to the RFCA site and coronary sinus ostium (Abl/His-CS ratio) and the ratio of amplitudes of atrial and ventricular potentials at the RFCA site (A/V ratio) were compared between the two groups. In the initial RFCA, retrograde slow pathway conduction was eliminated without impairment of anterograde slow pathway conduction in 8 (89%) patients from the ES group, and bidirectional slow pathway conduction was eliminated in 6 (86%) patients from the SP group. Residual anterograde slow pathway conduction that was preserved after the initial RFCA in 8 of 9 patients was eliminated by an additional slow potential-guided RFCA. Both the Abl/His-CS ratio (0.86 +/- 0.07 vs 0.73 +/- 0.11, P = 0.01) and A/V ratio (0.80 +/- 0.31 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.01, P < 0.001) were higher in the ES group than the SP group. The ratios for the residual anterograde slow pathway ablation in the ES group were similar to those in the SP group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the retrograde slow pathway runs more on the atrial side of the tricuspid valve annulus at the level of the coronary sinus ostium compared with the anterograde slow pathway, although both pathways run parallel or are fused in portions more proximal to the His bundle.     

Differentiating atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from junctional tachycardia: novel application of the delta H-A interval

Introduction: Junctional tachycardia (JT) and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can be difficult to differentiate. Yet, the two arrhythmias require distinct diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. We explored the utility of the delta H-A interval as a novel technique to differentiate these two tachycardias.
Methods: We included 35 patients undergoing electrophysiology study who had typical AVNRT, 31 of whom also had JT during slow pathway ablation, and four of whom had spontaneous JT during isoproterenol administration. We measured the H-A interval during tachycardia (H-A_T) and during ventricular pacing (H-A_P) from the basal right ventricle. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of measurements was assessed. Ventricular pacing was performed at approximately the same rate as tachycardia. The delta H-A interval was calculated as the H-A_P minus the H-A_T.
Results: There was excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement for measurement of the H-A interval. The average delta H-A interval was −10 ms during AVNRT and 9 ms during JT (P < 0.00001). For the diagnosis of JT, a delta H-A interval ≥ 0 ms had the sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 83%, positive predictive value of 84%, and negative predictive value of 88%. The delta H-A interval was longer in men than in women with JT, but no gender-based differences were seen with AVNRT. There was no difference in the H-A interval based on age ≤ 60 years.
Conclusion: The delta H-A interval is a novel and reproducibly measurable interval that aids the differentiation of JT and AVNRT during electrophysiology studies.     

Comparison of pre- and postoperative conduction patterns in patients surgically cured of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

Patients with atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia characteristically have short and constant retrograde His-atrium conduction times (H2A2 intervals) during the introduction of ventricular extrastimuli. It has therefore been suggested that the tachycardia circuit involves retrograde conduction up an accessory pathway located in perinodal tissue. If the mechanism of surgical cure of AV node reentrant tachycardia is interruption of this accessory pathway, postoperative changes in retrograde conduction would be expected. Thirteen patients with drug-refractory AV node reentrant tachycardia underwent surgery. Preoperatively, H2A2 intervals were short and constant. During AV node reentrant tachycardia, earliest atrial activation was seen near the His bundle and was 0 to 25 ms before ventricular activation in all patients except one. Surgery consisted of dissection of right atrial septal and anterior inputs to the AV node and central fibrous body. Postoperatively, the H2A2 interval remained short and constant compared with preoperative values although it was slightly prolonged (74 +/- 18 versus 61 +/- 21 ms, p less than 0.005). Twelve of the 13 patients are free of tachycardia after 28 +/- 13 months and no patient has had evidence of AV node block. Thus, surgical cure of AV node reentrant tachycardia is highly successful; however, there is no reason to postulate an accessory pathway or use of perinodal tissue as part of the tachycardia circuit and the mechanism of surgical success remains obscure.