Automated stereotactic core needle biopsy of microcalcifications with correlation to surgical biopsy.

PURPOSE: To compare pathologic findings from stereotactic core and excisional biopsies in patients with microcalcifications in the breast. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stereotactic core needle biopsies of 101 lesions with mammographic evidence of microcalcifications were performed with long-throw (2.2 cm) automated core biopsy devices fitted with 2.1-mm needles. The core specimens were placed on microscope slides and radiographed. The pathologic features of core and excisional specimens were compared. RESULTS: In 100 of the 101 breast lesions, a correct choice for an additional diagnostic procedure or definitive treatment could have been made upon histopathologic findings of the core needle biopsy. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic core needle biopsy is a reliable alternative to surgical biopsy of breast lesions with microcalcifications provided that specimen radiography has been performed to ensure that appropriate tissue has been obtained. Excisional biopsy may be avoided if microcalcifications are visible in radiographs of core biopsy specimen with benign histology.     

Comparison of preoperative simultaneous stereotactic fine needle aspiration biopsy and stereotactic core needle biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative results of stereotactic fine needle aspiration biopsy (S-FNAB) with stereotactic core needle biopsy (S-CNB) performed simultaneously in breast lesions with the postoperative histopathological diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of all histological grades. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 733 consecutive stereotactic biopsies were performed between May 1993 and June 1999. In 72 patients with mammographic findings suspicious of malignancy who were subjected to breast surgery, postoperative histopathology showed DCIS. Preoperatively, S-FNAB and S-CNB had been done simultaneously in all patients, S-FNAB with spinal needle 0.7 or 0.9 mm and S-CNB was performed with an automated 2.1-mm biopsy gun. An average of 3 S-FNABs and 3 S-CNBs were performed in each patient. RESULTS: In 56 (78%) of the 72 patients S-CNB showed DCIS. In 3 patients (4%) the S-CNB revealed "probable carcinoma", in 7 patients (10%) "atypia" and in 6, the lesions were benign. In 34 (47%) of the 72 women S-FNABs showed carcinoma, not otherwise specified. In 6 cases (8%) the S-FNABs showed "probable carcinoma" and in 12 patients (17%) "atypia"; 8 lesions were benign and 12 not diagnostic. CONCLUSION: S-CNB was superior to S-FNAB in diagnosing DCIS. Only 6 patients (8%) received a benign or non-diagnostic preoperative diagnosis with S-CNB compared to 20 patients (28%) with S-FNAB. S-CNB was superior to S-FNAB for preoperative diagnosis of DCIS, but S-FNAB could further increase the sensitivity of the biopsy since it diagnosed cancer in 4 cases where S-CNB showed benign material.     

Stereotaxic core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications obtained using a standard mammography table with an add-on unit.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the reliability of stereotaxic biopsy of indeterminate microcalcifications using a standard mammography table with an add-on unit. METHODS: In 121 cases of indeterminate microcalcifications, core biopsy was performed using a standard mammography table with an add-on stereotaxic unit. Microcalcifications were identified on radiography of core specimens. RESULTS: Microcalcifications and a definitive histologic diagnosis were obtained in 112 core biopsies (92.6%), with no significant complications. In 23 lesions frank malignancy was diagnosed, and all of these diagnoses were confirmed on surgery. Pathologic examination suggested carcinoma in 4 lesions, and open biopsy confirmed malignancy in 3 of these cases. Four lesions showed atypical ductal hyperplasia. Benign disease was diagnosed in 81 lesions, of which 78 remained stable on mammographic follow-up (mean 16 months later) and 3 were subjected to surgical biopsy (of which 1 was malignant and 2 were benign). Nine cases were technically unsatisfactory because microcalcifications were not sampled. CONCLUSION: Stereotaxic core biopsy performed with an add-on unit is a safe and reliable technique for biopsy of indeterminate microcalcifications. For successful biopsy, microcalcifications must be harvested. Pathologic results should be correlated with mammographic findings. The accuracy rate compares favourably with results reported using prone biopsy tables. In an era of cost containment, this alternative to prone biopsy tables could result in significant savings in terms of capital investment and use of hospital rooms. In this study, surgical biopsy could have been avoided in 64.5% of cases.     

Underestimation of the presence of breast carcinoma in papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core-needle biopsy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the degree of underestimation of breast carcinoma diagnosis in papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core-needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and waiver of informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Mammographic database review (1994-2003) revealed core biopsy diagnoses of benign papilloma (n=38), atypical papilloma (n=15), sclerotic papilloma (n=6), and micropapilloma (n=4) in 57 women (mean age, 57 years). Excisional or mammographic follow-up (>or=2 years) findings were available. Patients with in situ or invasive cancer in the same breast or patients without follow-up were excluded. Findings were collected from mammography, ultrasonography, core technique, core biopsy, excision, and subsequent mammography. Reference standard was excisional findings or follow-up mammogram with no change at 2 years. Associations were examined with regression methods. RESULTS: In 38 of 63 lesions, surgical excision was performed; in 25 additional lesions (considered benign), follow-up mammography (24-month minimum) was performed, with no interval change. In 15 lesions, 14-gauge core needle was used; in 48, vacuum assistance (mean cores per lesion, 8.7). Carcinoma was found at excision in 14 of 38 lesions. Core pathologic findings associated with malignancy were benign papilloma (n=1), sclerotic papilloma (n=1), micropapilloma (n=2), and atypical papilloma (n=10). Frequency of malignancy was one (3%) of 38 benign papillomas, 10 (67%) of 15 atypical papillomas, two (50%) of four micropapillomas, and one (17%) of six sclerotic papillomas. Excisional findings included lobular carcinoma in situ (n=2), ductal carcinoma in situ (n=7), papillary carcinoma (n=2), and invasive ductal carcinoma (n=3). Low-risk group (micropapillomas and sclerotic and benign papillomas) was compared with high-risk atypical papilloma group. Core findings were associated with malignancy at excision for atypical papilloma (P=.006). Lesion location, mammographic finding, core number, or needle type were not associated (P>.05) with underestimation of malignancy at excision. CONCLUSION: Benign papilloma diagnosed at core biopsy is infrequently (3%) associated with malignancy; mammographic follow-up is reasonable. Because of the high association with malignancy (67%), diagnosis of atypical papilloma at core biopsy should prompt excision for definitive diagnosis.     

When have mammographic calcifications been adequately sampled at needle core biopsy?

AIMS: To determine if the number of flecks of calcification retrieved at stereotaxic core needle biopsy or the number of core samples obtained containing calcification are related to biopsy sensitivity, and to determine how many calcifications or cores containing calcification the radiologist should aim to retrieve when sampling mammographic microcalcification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of core specimen radiographs from 57 consecutive patients who had stereotaxic core needle biopsies of impalpable malignant microcalcifications without an associated mammographic mass. The total number of calcifications retrieved and the numbers of cores containing calcification were correlated with findings at core and surgical histology. RESULTS: Increasing retrieval of calcification elements visible on specimen radiography was associated with increasing sensitivity of the biopsy. Five or more flecks of calcium gave an absolute sensitivity of 100%. Increasing numbers of core samples obtained containing radiographically demonstrable calcification was also associated with increasing sensitivity. Three or more cores containing calcium resulted in a 100% absolute sensitivity for malignancy. CONCLUSION: To ensure adequate sampling of calcification at core biopsy, an optimum of either three or more cores containing calcium or five or more flecks of calcium in total is required. Achieving this target ensures a high pre-operative diagnosis rate for malignant microcalcifications.Bagnall, M. J. C. (2000). Clinical Radiology 55, 548-553.     

Stereotactic core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions using a conventional mammography unit with an add-on device

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the accuracy of an add-on stereotactic unit for core needle biopsy of mammographic lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Between September 1994 and February 2001, 506 stereotactic core needle biopsies of mammographic lesions in 492 patients were performed in our center on a mammography unit with add-on stereotactic equipment. Of the initial 92 patients, 80 underwent stereotactic core needle biopsy and surgical excision simultaneously. In subsequent cases, surgical biopsy was performed after core biopsy in patients who had malignant or atypical histologic results or discordance between mammographic and pathologic findings. Follow-up mammography was advised for all patients whose core biopsy results were diagnosed as benign lesions. RESULTS: Histologic results for 506 lesions undergoing stereotactic core needle biopsy were as follows: 113 (22.3%) were malignant; 369 (72.9%), benign; and 24 (4.7%), atypical. Of 113 malignant lesions identified at stereotactic core needle biopsy, 111 were confirmed as malignant, whereas two showed no evidence of malignancy at surgical excision. Of 369 lesions diagnosed as benign at stereotactic core needle biopsy, 172 (46.6%) showed no change on follow-up mammography, 114 (30.9%) were lost to follow-up, and 83 (22%) underwent surgical excision. Of 24 lesions with atypical histology, 23 had surgical follow-up, six were malignant, nine were benign, and eight were confirmed as showing atypical histology. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of the 506 lesions was complicated by five (1.0%) cases of vasovagal attack and four (0.8%) cases of bleeding. The resulting sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 98.3%, 93.0%, 86.0%, and 99.2% respectively. CONCLUSION: Biopsy with an add-on unit is safe, reliable, accurate, and cost-effective with results comparable to those reported for dedicated prone biopsy devices.     

Stereotactic 14G core biopsy of non-palpable breast cancer: what is the relationship between the number of core samples taken and the sensitivity for detection of malignancy?

AIM: Percutaneous 14-gauge core biopsy (CB) guided by digital stereotactic mammography is now an established technique in the investigation of women with non-palpable suspicious mammographic lesions. Diagnostic sensitivity of CB is affected both by the nature of the mammographic abnormality and by the number of core samples taken. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective review of 500 women who have undergone CB in our institution showed that in 235 cases, invasive or non-invasive carcinoma was found on final surgical histology. Correlation between CB result and surgical histology revealed a significant increase in sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignancy if a larger number of cores were taken (84.3% for two cores and 90.2% for five cores vs. 97.9% for six or more cores). This trend was maintained when patients were subdivided according to mammographic abnormality, either soft tissue mass or microcalcifications. The effect on diagnostic sensitivity of increasing the number of tissue cores obtained was most pronounced in patients with microcalcifications graded as low or moderately suspicious for malignancy (70.1% for two cores and 79.1% for five cores vs 94.0% for six or more cores). The presence of an invasive component in a malignant lesion was correctly diagnosed using CB in 79.2% overall if at least six cores were taken. If the mammographic lesion was a soft tissue mass, this figure rose to 95.7%, but was only 35.7% if the visible lesion was composed of microcalcifications alone. CONCLUSION: Our series confirms the reliability of stereotactic CB in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Diagnostic sensitivity is improved by increasing the number of cores taken (to six or more), particularly in women with mammographic microcalcifications of an equivocal nature.     

Pre-operative simultaneous stereotactic core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma

Purpose:
To determine the diagnostic value of stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) in comparison to stereotactic fine-needle aspiration biopsy (SFNAB) in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC).
Material and Methods:
Twenty-two patients with clinical or mammographic findings suspicious of malignancy underwent surgery where postoperative histopathology showed ILC. Pre-operative attempts of diagnosis were made using SFNAB and SCNB. SFNAB was done with a spinal needle 0.7- or 0.9-mm and SCNB was simultaneously performed with an automated 2.1-mm biopsy gun in all patients.
Results:
SFNAB was diagnostic of carcinoma in 9 women, showed "probable carcinoma" in 5 and "atypia" in 3. In the remaining 5 women, SFNAB showed no atypia.

SCNB diagnosed ILC in 20 patients and showed ILC as well as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in 1. Ductal carcinoma in situ was suggested in the remaining patient.
Conclusion:
SCNB was superior to SFNAB in diagnosing ILC and did not miss any carcinoma, whereas SFNAB was non-diagnostic in 8 cases. SCNB is thus recommended in patients with suspicion of ILC of the breast.     

Breast microcalcifications: retrieval failure at prone stereotactic core and vacuum breast biopsy--frequency, causes, and outcome

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the frequency and causes of failure to retrieve microcalcifications in nonpalpable lesions, as judged on a radiograph of the specimen, and to determine outcome in patients with those lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to biopsy. The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study and granted a waiver of informed consent. Retrospective review was performed of 1701 consecutive nonpalpable microcalcification lesions in 1511 women aged 29-92 years (median age, 54 years) who underwent percutaneous stereotactic biopsy on a prone biopsy table. Biopsy was successively performed with 14-gauge core, 14-gauge vacuum, and 11-gauge vacuum devices, with mild selection bias, and for each lesion, biopsy was performed with one device. Radiographs of the specimen were obtained to see whether microcalcifications were retrieved. Patient, mammographic, and biopsy variables were correlated with negative radiographs of the specimen. At repeat biopsy or mammographic follow-up, outcome was evaluated in patients with benign histologic results and negative radiographs of the specimen by using Fisher exact test P values. RESULTS: Radiographs of the specimen were negative in 16% (30 of 182) of lesions at 14-gauge core biopsy, in 4% (four of 96) of lesions at 14-gauge vacuum biopsy, and in 1% (19 of 1423) of lesions at 11-gauge vacuum biopsy (P < .001). Substantial bleeding was a significant factor (P < .001) in failure to retrieve microcalcifications at only 11-gauge vacuum biopsy. Histologic results in 53 lesions with negative radiographs of the specimen were malignant (n = 6), indicated atypical hyperplasia (n = 6), or were benign (n = 41). Follow-up in patients with 40 benign lesions was performed with repeat biopsy (n = 17, with malignancy in three lesions) or mammography (n = 23) for 15-128 months (median, 70 months); one patient with one lesion was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Failure to retrieve microcalcifications was least common with 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy and occurred in 1% (19 of 1423) of lesions. Cancer was missed in 8% (three of 40) of benign lesions in patients who were followed up.     

A comparison of 14 and 12 gauge needles for core biopsy of suspicious mammographic calcification

This study was carried out to compare the efficacy of 14 vs 12 G needles in stereotactic core biopsy of mammographic calcification. A consecutive series of 100 impalpable mammographic calcifications, without an associated mass and requiring stereotactic core biopsy were randomly allocated to either 14 G or 12 G needle sampling. All biopsies were performed using an upright stereotactic digital unit (Senovision GE) and a Bard automated biopsy gun. Core biopsy results were categorized as either normal, benign, atypical ductal hyperplasia, suspicious of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), DCIS or invasive cancer. The radiographic calcification retrieval rates, complete and absolute sensitivity for malignancy of DCIS and DCIS with an invasive focus were obtained by comparison of core results with surgical histology. Radiographic calcification retrieval was achieved in 86% when using 14 G and 12 G needles. The absolute sensitivity and complete sensitivity for diagnosing DCIS were the same with 12 G and 14 G needles (72% versus 71% and 93% versus 94%, respectively). The use of 12 G needles does not appear to confer benefit over the use of 14 G needles in the diagnosis of mammographic calcification.     

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations

AIM: We compared radiological assessment with pathological diagnoses in 500 consecutive vacuum-assisted breast biopsies performed for microcalcifications. METHODS: Lesions were biopsied using a 11-gauge mammotome device. Before biopsy, microcalcifications were classified according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Histopathological and radiological diagnosis were compared. RESULTS: Histopathology revealed 333 (67%) benign lesions. Benign lesions were classified as BI-RADS 3 in 19%, and as suspicious in 35%. 167 lesions (33%) were malignant. Malignant lesions were classified as suspicious or highly suggestive of malignancy in 63%. Frequency of malignancy in BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 was 35% and 100%, respectively. In BI-RADS 3 microcalcifications, the malignancy frequency was 19%. The mammographic features with the highest positive predictive value for malignancies were pleomorphic morphology (42%) and a linear or segmental distribution (51%). The microcalcification morphology was not reliably able to predict malignancy. CONCLUSION: In this study, BI-RADS 3 microcalcification lesions had a malignancy rate that is higher than previously reported. Vacuum-assisted biopsy is useful in any indeterminate and suspicious microcalcifications and provides maximum information before any operative intervention.     

US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications

PURPOSE: To determine whether ultrasonography (US) can depict breast masses associated with mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications and whether the visibility at US is different between benign and malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients with 100 mammographically detected microcalcification clusters prospectively underwent US with a 10- or 12-MHz transducer before mammographically guided presurgical hook-wire localization. The visibility of breast masses at US was correlated with histologic and mammographic findings. RESULTS: Surgical biopsy revealed 62 benign lesions, 30 intraductal cancers, and eight invasive cancers. At US, breast masses associated with microcalcifications were seen in 45 (45%) of 100 cases. US depicted more breast masses associated with malignant (31 [82%] of 38) than with benign (14 [23%] of 62) microcalcifications (P: <.001). In malignant microcalcification clusters larger than 10 mm, US depicted associated breast masses in all 25 cases. There was no statistically significant difference in shape and distribution of calcific particles, as well as in breast composition, at mammography between US visible and invisible groups. CONCLUSION: Given a known mammographic location, US with a high-frequency transducer can depict breast masses associated with malignant microcalcifications, particularly clusters larger than 10 mm. US can be used to visualize large clusters of microcalcifications that have a very high suspicion of malignancy.     

Breast US in patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy on screening mammography

PURPOSE: To review ultrasound (US) findings in patients who have suspicious microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy (BI-RADS category 4A) on screening mammography and to evaluate helpful findings in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2005 and July 2006, 192 patients showed microcalcifications only, without mass or associated density, on screening mammography. Among them, we selected 82 patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy (category 4A) that were pathologically confirmed by surgical excision after wire localization (n=23) or biopsy (n=59). Breast US was performed in 37/82 cases and we analyzed the US findings for the calcification areas in these patients, evaluating the findings with benign or malignant pathological results. We correlated US findings with mammographic calcifications using mammography-guided 2D-localization for the calcifications before US examination. RESULTS: There were 12 malignant lesions (32.4%) including 3 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), one microinvasive ductal carcinoma (MIDC), 8 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 25 benign lesions (67.6%) including 2 atypical ductal hyperplasias (ADH). IDC showed calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma or calcifications within complex hypoechoic masses of taller-than-wide shape on US. One MIDC showed calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma and six DCIS showed negative findings, or calcifications with a small nodule, or only calcifications on US. The most common positive US finding in benign lesions was cysts with calcifications. In 24/37 cases (64.8%) with negative US findings, 18 (75%) were benign lesions and 6 (25%) were DCIS. CONCLUSION: In patients with category 4A microcalcifications without associated findings on screening mammography, negative US findings had a high rate of benign results (18/24, 75%). Visible calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma or mass on US increased the probability of malignancy.     

Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: when is excision necessary?

OBJECTIVE:. This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of cases of radial scar diagnosed by percutaneous core needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 198 nonpalpable lesions diagnosed with radial scars found at core needle biopsy, 157 lesions constituting the study group had undergone surgical excision (n = 102) or mammographic surveillance after biopsy for at least 24 months (median, 38 months; n = 55). Mammographic lesion type, lesion size, biopsy guidance method, biopsy device, number of specimens per lesion, and presence of atypical hyperplasia at percutaneous biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. Results were compared with histologic findings at surgery or mammographic findings during surveillance. RESULTS:. Carcinoma was found at excision in 28% (8/29) of lesions with associated atypical hyperplasia at percutaneous biopsy and 4% (5/128) of lesions without associated atypia (p < 0.0001). In the latter group, carcinoma was found at excision in 3% (2/60) of masses, 8% (3/40) of architectural distortions, and 0% (0/28) of microcalcification lesions. Malignancy was missed in 9% (5/58) of lesions biopsied with a spring-loaded device and in 0% (0/70) of lesions biopsied with a directional vacuum-assisted device (p = 0.01); and in 8% (5/60) of lesions sampled with less than 12 specimens per lesion and 0% (0/68) sampled with 12 or more specimens (p = 0.015). Lesion type, maximal lesion diameter, and type of imaging guidance (stereotactic or sonographic) were not significant factors in determining the presence of malignancy. CONCLUSION:. Diagnosis of radial scar based on core needle biopsy is likely to be reliable when there is no associated atypical hyperplasia at percutaneous biopsy, when the biopsy includes at least 12 specimens, and when mammographic findings are reconciled with histologic findings. When the lesion diagnosed by core needle biopsy as radial scar does not meet these criteria, excisional biopsy is indicated.     

Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of sonography to depict and guide biopsies of mammographically suspicious microcalcifications and to reveal the mammographic features and histologic outcomes of lesions amenable to sonographically guided biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS:. Suspicious clusters of microcalcifications without other mammographic abnormalities were evaluated on sonography before biopsy and divided into two groups: those with and those without microcalcifications seen on sonography. Sonographically detected lesions underwent sonographically guided biopsy; lesions not seen on sonography underwent mammographically guided biopsy. Imaging features and histologies were correlated, and the positive predictive value of sonography was determined. RESULTS: Of 111 lesions (105 patients), 26 lesions (23%) were identified and underwent sonographically guided biopsy; 85 lesions (77%) were not identified sonographically. The diameters of microcalcification clusters in the sonographically identified group were significantly larger (p = 0.0005) and contained larger numbers of microcalcification particles (p = 0.038) compared with clusters not identified sonographically. Sonographically identified lesions were seen as masses (77%) or dilated ducts (23%) with echogenic foci. Sonographically identified lesions were more likely to be malignant than those not seen on sonography (69% vs 21%, respectively; p < 0.00002). Of 38 malignant lesions, those visible on sonography were more likely to be invasive than those not seen on sonography (72% vs 28%, respectively; p = 0.018). In malignant lesions undergoing core biopsy and surgical excision, the extent of disease was underestimated less with sonographically guided biopsy (7%, 1/15) than with stereotactic biopsy (33%, 5/15). CONCLUSION: Suspicious microcalcifications are seen infrequently on sonography (23%) but, when detected, can be successfully biopsied with sonographic guidance and more frequently are malignant and represent invasive cancer than those seen on mammography alone.     

Stereotactic core needle biopsy in non-palpable breast lesions. What number is needed?

Purpose: To investigate whether three stereotactic core needle biopsies (S-CNB) in non-palpable breast lesion are enough for accurate preoperative diagnosis.

Material and Methods: Between September 1994 and December 2000, 523 patients with mammographically detected breast lesions and who proceeded to surgery were preoperatively stereotactically biopsied with an automated 14-gauge biopsy device. Three samples were taken from each lesion irrespective of whether the lesion presented as “microcalcifications only”, “microcalcifications and a mass”, or a “mass, architectural distorsion, or stellate lesion without microcalcifications”. The histopathology was divided into three subgroups: diagnostic, atypia (ranging from atypical cells to probably cancer), and non-diagnostic material.

Results: Post-surgical histopathology diagnosed 454 (87%) malignant tumors and 69 (13%) benign lesions. Three S-CNB correctly diagnosed the malignant tumors in 84% in the subgroup “microcalcifications only”. In the category “microcalcifications and a mass”, the diagnostic accuracy was 97% and in the subgroup “mass, architectural distorsion, or stellate lesion without microcalcifications” 3 S-CNB resulted in 93% correct diagnostic material. In 19 of the 454 patients (4%) 1, 2 or all 3 preoperative S-CNB showed atypia. In 20 patients (4%), all 3 S-CNB were non-diagnostic. Thirteen of these 20 patients had “microcalcifications only” and 7 had a mass without microcalcifications.

Conclusion: Three S-CNB were enough for correct diagnosis in “masses, architectural distorsions, or stellate lesions without microcalcifications” and in “microcalcifications and a mass”, but were not sufficient in “microcalcifications only”.     

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with microcalcifications classed as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS) 3-5. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with mammographic microcalcifications classified as BI-RADS categories 3, 4 or 5 underwent MRI and biopsy with stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). Our gold standard was microhistology in all cases and histology with histological grading in patients who underwent surgery. Patients with a microhistological diagnosis of benign lesions underwent mammographic follow-up for at least 12 months. MRI was performed with a 1.5-Tesla (T) unit, and T1 coronal three-dimensional (3D) fast low-angle shot sequences were acquired before and after injection of paramagnetic contrast agent (0.1 mmol/kg). MRI findings, according to the Fisher score, were classified into BI-RADS classes. In patients with cancer who underwent surgery, we retrospectively compared the extension of the mammographic and MRI findings with histological extension. RESULTS: Histology revealed 26 ductal in situ cancers (DCIS) and ductal microinvasive cancers (DCmic), three atypical ductal hyperplasias (ADH) and 26 benign conditions. Histological grading of the 26 patients with cancer revealed four cases of G1, 11 cases of G2 and 11 cases of G3. If we consider mammographic BI-RADS category 3 as benign and BI-RADS 4 and 5 as malignant, mammography had 77% sensitivity, 59% specificity, 63% positive predictive value (PPV), 74% negative predictive value (NPV) and 67.2% diagnostic accuracy. If we consider MRI BI-RADS categories 1, 2 and 3 as benign and 4 and 5 as malignant, MRI had 73% sensitivity, 76% specificity, 73% PPV, 76% NPV and 74.5% diagnostic accuracy. As regards disease extension, mammography had 45% sensitivity and MRI had 84.6% sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Mammography and stereotactic biopsy still remain the only techniques for characterising microcalcifications. MRI cannot be considered a diagnostic tool for evaluating microcalcifications. It is, however, useful for identifying DCIS with more aggressive histological grades. An important application of MRI in patients with DCIS associated with suspicious microcalcifications could be to evaluate disease extension after a microhistological diagnosis of malignancy, as it allows a more accurate presurgical planning.     

Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ultrasound (US)-guided core biopsy in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to correlate the histological results on percutaneous biopsy and surgical excision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 2,423 consecutive core biopsies performed under US guidance, we evaluated 65 lesions with a histological diagnosis of DCIS. All patients underwent mammography, high-frequency broadband US and percutaneous breast biopsy with a 14-gauge needle and a mean number of five samples (range 4-7 passes). Surgical excision was performed in all cases, and the histological results on the surgical specimen were correlated with those on core biopsy samples. The sonographic features of DCIS lesions were described, comparing pure DCIS (those confirmed by definitive histology) and DCIS with invasive component at surgical excision. RESULTS: Twenty-seven out of 65 DCIS at core biopsy were found to have an invasive or microinvasive component at surgical excision, leading to rate of histological underestimation of core biopsy of 41.5%. The most frequent sonographic appearances were: (a) mass without microcalcifications (47.4% of pure DCIS, 63% of DCIS with invasive component); (b) mass with microcalcifications (23.7% of pure DCIS, 22% of DCIS with invasive component); (c) isolated microcalcifications (10.5% of pure DCIS); (d) ductal abnormalities (18.4% of pure DCIS, 15% of DCIS with invasive component). CONCLUSIONS: Due to the high underestimation rate of core biopsy, caution is mandatory in the case of DCIS diagnosis on core biopsy. Although some histological features (such as stromal fibrosis, periductal inflammatory infiltrate, high nuclear grade) can suggest the presence of an invasive component, the sonographic appearance of DCIS cannot be used to predict the cases that are underestimated on US-guided core biopsy. Nevertheless, a sonographically detectable solid component, either inside dilatated ducts or associated with microcalcifications, and a size greater than 20 mm are frequently associated with the presence of an invasive component.     

Nonpalpable breast microcalcifications: frequency, management, and results of incisional biopsy.

In a series of 500 consecutive needle localizations, there were 165 biopsies for benign microcalcifications without a mass. An incisional biopsy was performed in 49 of these cases (30%). Follow-up mammograms were available for review in 39 of the cases. The average length of follow-up was 32 months. In no case did malignancy develop at the biopsy site. When an incisional biopsy is performed, careful follow-up mammography is an alternative to a repeated needle localization and biopsy in selected cases.     

Proliferative high-risk lesions of the breast: contribution and limits of US-guided core biopsy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively correlate high-risk proliferative breast lesions (radial scar, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and papillary lesions) diagnosed on core biopsy with the definitive histopathological diagnosis obtained after surgical excision or with the follow-up, in order to assess the role of core biopsy in such lesions. To discuss the management of the patient after a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 74 out of 1776 core biopsies consecutively performed on 67 patients. The histopathologic findings were as follows: 11 radial scars (RS), 3 atypical lobular hyperplasias (ALH), 3 lobular carcinomas in situ (LCIS), 57 benign papillary lesions. All patients underwent bilateral mammography, whole-breast ultrasound with a linear-array broadband transducer, and core biopsy with a 14 Gauge needle and a mean number of samples of 5 (range 4-7). Sixty-two of 67 patients, for a total of 69/74 lesions, underwent surgical biopsy despite benign histopathologic findings, mostly because of highly suspicious imaging for malignancy (BIRADS 4-5), whereas 5 patients refused surgery and have been followed up for a least 18 months and are still being followed up (2 with RS, 1 with ADH and 2 with papillary lesions). RESULTS: Among the core biopsied lesions with a diagnosis of RS (n = 11) pathology revealed one ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (this case was characterized by granular microcalcifications on mammography and by a mass with irregular margins on ultrasound). Also in the group of ADH (n = 3) pathology revealed one DCIS (lesion not visible on mammography but depicted as a suspicious mass on US). In the group of LCIS (n = 3) pathologists found an invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Among the benign papillary lesions (n = 57) histopathologic analysis of the surgical specimen revealed 7 malignant lesions (4 papillary carcinomas and 3 DCIS), whose mammographic and ultrasound findings were indistinguishable from benign lesions. Altogether there were 10 false negative results (underestimation) out of 74 core biopsies with a diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions. CONCLUSION: The high rate of histological underestimation after core biopsy (10/74) (13.5%) demands a very careful management of patents with a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions, especially in the case of RS, lobular neoplasia and papillary lesions. However, the high imaging suspicion for malignancy prompts surgery. It is possible to assume that, when there is a low imaging suspicion for malignancy, when enough tissue has been sampled for pathology and no atypia is found within the lesions, surgery is not mandatory but a very careful follow-up is recommended. We must underline that there is no agreement regarding the quantity of tissue to sample. Vacuum-assisted biopsy may lead to better results, although there is as yet no proof that it can actually replace surgery in this group of lesions, since it seems only to reduce but not abolish the histological underestimation.