Short- and long-term (final height) data in children with normal variant short stature treated with growth hormone

Seventeen children with normal variant short stature and a predicted height below −2 SDS were treated with growth hormone (GH) six times a week for a period of 5 years. Patients were randomly selected to receive three different doses of GH, group 1 (n=6) 3␣IU/m² per day, group 2 (n=6) 4.5 IU/m² per day and group 3 (n=5) 3 IU/m² per day in the 1st year and 4.5␣IU/m² per day thereafter. There was a significant increase in height after 1 and 2 years for all patients and for all subgroups. However, this increase was not dependent on GH dose. The decrease in height velocity during the 2nd year was not prevented by the increase of GH dose in group 3. The change of predicted height after 2 years was +0.75 SDS (according to Tanner Whitehouse). Fourteen children have been treated for 4␣years and 8 children for 5 years without a further change in height prediction. Nine patients have reached final height which was 2.4 cm (+0.41 SDS) above pretreatment height prediction. Final height was nearly identical to predicted height after 1 year of therapy. Conclusion An increment in height prediction was observed during the first 2 years of GH treatment and maintained thereafter. However, there was only a minor increase in final height over predicted height which does not justify the general use of GH in children with normal variant short stature. Received: 19 December 1996 / Accepted: 21 February 1997     

Effectiveness of growth hormone (GH) therapy in GH-deficient children and non-GH-deficient short children

The growth response during short-term growth hormone (GH) treatment was evaluated in eight prepubertal non-GH-deficient (non-GHD) children and compared with six prepubertal GH-deficient (GHD) patients. Standard doses of GH can improve growth rate in GHD and in some non-GHD patients. In neither group the growth response can be predicted by the acute increase in Thymidine Activity or Somatomedin-C levels. A diagnostic trial of GH treatment may be the only certain method of selecting the short non-GHD patients who may benefit from long-term GH therapy.Abbreviations GH growth hormone - GHD growth hormone deficient - Sm-C somatomedin C - TA thymidine activity     

Rapid effect of intravenous growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone 1–44 on plasma GH levels in children

Growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH)-testing was performed in 24 short normal children (16 male, 8 female). Before and after administration of GHRH_1–44 (1g/kg body weight i.v.) blood samples for growth hormone (GH) determination were drawn at-30, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min. Plasma GH increase was apparent 1 min after injection and in 12 patients (7 female) peak plasma GH values were reached within 15 min. In all patients plasma GH levels were greater than 10 ng/ml within the first 8 min following GHRH injection, but in 4 patients this level was not attained when considering only GH values obtained after 15 min. These results demonstrate the capability of the pituitary to rapidly secerete GH in response to GHRH_1–44 in children. Therefore, in this age group blood samples for GH determination should be taken earlier when testing with GHRH_1–44.Abbreviations GHRH growth hormone releasing hormone - GH growth hormone - SD standard deviation     

Quality of life of young adults with idiopathic short stature: effect of growth hormone treatment

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) affects the quality of life of young adults who were diagnosed as idiopathic short stature (ISS) during childhood, and whether their quality of life and aspects of the personality are different from normal. Experiences and expectations concerning rhGH treatment of the subjects and their parents were also investigated. Eighty-nine subjects were included into the study: 24 subjects (16M, 8F) were treated with rhGH from childhood, whereas 65 subjects (40M, 25F) were never treated. At the time of the interview all subjects had attained final height [mean (SD) -2.3 (0.9) SDS for Dutch references], and the age of the treated subjects was 20.5 (1.0)y, and 25.7 (3.5)y of the control subjects (p < 0:001). The level of education was similar, but the treated subjects had less often a partner compared to the control subjects (adjusted for age and gender, p < 0:001). The Nottingham Health Profile and Short Form 36 Health Survey showed no difference in general health state between treated and control subjects, and the healthy Dutch age-specific references (norm group). Although 74% of the subjects reported one or more negative events related to their height, and 61% would like to be taller, only 22% and 11% were willing to trade-off at Time Trade-Off and Standard Gamble, respectively. The personality of the subjects, which was measured by the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, was not different from the norm group. The satisfaction with the rhGH treatment was high, as it had caused 12 (8) cm and 13 (7) cm gain in final height according to the subjects and parents, respectively. Based on initial predicted adult height (Bayley & Pinneau), this gain was only 3.3(5.6) cm. We concluded that although the treated subjects had a partner less often when compared to the control subjects, the quality of life of subjects with ISS at adult age is normal and appears not to be affected by rhGH therapy, The treated subjects were very satisfied with the treatment, probably by overestimation of the final height gain.     

Growth hormone treatment in short children with chronic kidney disease

Growth hormone (GH) has been used for treatment of impaired growth in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) for nearly 17 years. Controlled and open-label studies have shown that GH is highly effective in improving growth velocity and adult height. The growth response is negatively correlated with age and height at start and time spent on dialysis treatment; it is positively correlated with dose and duration of treatment and the primary renal disease (renal hypodysplasia). In children with renal transplants, corticosteroid treatment is an additional factor negatively influencing spontaneous growth rates. However, GH treatment is able to compensate corticosteroid-induced growth failure. GH treatment improved final height by 0.5-1.7 standard deviation score (SDS) in various studies, whereas the control group lost about 0.5 SDS in comparable time intervals. These variable results are explained in part by the factors mentioned above. The adverse events are comparable to those in non-CKD children treated with GH. CONCLUSION: GH treatment is safe and highly effective in improving growth and final height of short children with all stages of CKD. The highest treatment success is obtained if treatment is started at an early age and with relatively well-preserved residual renal function and continued until final height.     

Preliminary validation of a prediction model for the short-term growth response to growth hormone therapy in children with idiopathic short stature

A discriminant scoring system, using multivariate analysis, has been developed for pretreatment prediction of responsiveness to a 6-month trial of growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children with subnormal growth velocity, but without GH deficiency. Inclusion criteria included a birth weight above 2.5 kg, height below the 3rd centile for chronological age, height velocity below the 25th centile for bone age, no signs of puberty, a maximal GH response to pharmacological stimulation of above 10 μg/l and treatment with GH at a dose of 12–16 IU/m²/week. Children with an increase in height velocity greater than 2.5 cm/year after therapy were considered to be responders. Pretreatment clinical data from 67 patients were employed in a discriminant analysis in order to establish the model. The scoring system developed was as follows: score = -0.4 + 0.92X₁– 0.87X₂, where X₁ is the height velocity SD score (SDS) for chronological age, and X₂ is the bone age SDS for chronological age. This model had a specificity of 96.3% and a sensitivity of 92.5% in predicting the responsiveness to GH. The model has subsequently been applied to a group of 14 patients in order to establish its validity; in this group its sensitivity was 83.3% and its specificity 100%. These preliminary data suggest that the model can be used as a guideline for selecting short, slowly growing, non-GH-deficient children who will respond to short-term GH therapy.     

Growth hormone improves height in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: 4-year data of a controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of growth hormone treatment in severely growth retarded children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) receiving glucocorticoids. STUDY DESIGN: Children with systemic and polyarticular idiopathic arthritis (22 F, 16 M) with a mean age of 10.1 years were enrolled in this controlled study. Eighteen patients (9 F, 9M; mean age, 10.5 years) received growth hormone in a dose of 0.20 to 0.33 mg/kg body weight per week for 4 years. Twenty patients (13 F, 7 M; mean age, 9.6 years) served as an untreated control group. RESULTS: Mean improvement in height in the treated group was 1 SD, whereas the patients of the control group lost 0.7 SD. Disease activity markers correlated significantly with the mean growth velocity standard deviation score. In general, children with mild or moderate disease and lower comedication grew and responded better to growth hormone therapy than those with active disease. No adverse events were noted. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that long-term growth hormone therapy has a beneficial effect in children with severe forms of JIA. Further data are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of growth hormone and its effect on final height.     

重组人生长激素对不同生长激素分泌状态青春前期矮小患儿近期疗效分析

目的探讨部分性生长激素缺乏症（pGHD）患儿在重组人生长激素（rhGH）治疗后早期追赶性生长的规律。方法回顾性分析62例青春前期不同生长激素（GH）分泌状态矮小患儿用rhGH治疗后,近期（1．5年）追赶性生长指标（生长速度和身高Z分增值）和促生长素轴实验室指标的变化。其中,完全性生长激素缺乏症（cGHD）27例;非GH缺乏性矮小（NGHD）12例;pGHD23例,按GH激发峰值7ng／ml分为pGHD-1（12例）和pGHD-2（11例）两个亚组。结果cGHD和NGHD初始追赶性生长的幅度相似,但NGHD组持续时间较短。pGHD和cGHD以同一rhGH生理替代量治疗后,促生长的应答（生长速度和AIGFBP-3SDS）pGHD-1和cGHD差异无统计学意义,但pGHD-2却低于cGHD,而与NGHD差异无统计学意义。结论GH激发试验的诊断界值选用7ng／ml有更合理的依据,诊断pGHD时尤应审慎。pGHD-2组治疗早期的生长追赶不完全可能与rhGH剂量相对不足有关。     

Bilateral anorchia in infancy: occurence of micropenis and the effect of testosterone treatment

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical and histological findings in boys with bilateral anorchia and the response to testosterone treatment on penis length. STUDY DESIGN: Patients were divided into two groups according to the absence (group A, n = 29) or the presence (group B, n = 26) of palpable intrascrotal or inguinal mass at first clinical examination. RESULTS: A micropenis was found in 46% of patients (n = 24) with a similar proportion in both groups. Testosterone treatment induced a mean penis length gain of 1.9 +/- 1.3 SDS (standard deviation score). However, micropenis persisted in six patients. Histological examination (n = 18) confirmed the absence of any testicular structure with deferent ducts being present unilaterally or bilaterally in all but three patients. In these three patients, a hemorrhagic testis, probably as a result of a mechanical torsion, was found. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of isolated micropenis in almost half of patients with bilateral anorchia strongly suggests that the testicular damage frequently occurs during the second half of gestation after male sexual differentiation. In most cases, testosterone treatment stimulates the penile growth. Although the pathogenesis of bilateral anorchia may be heterogeneous, our study suggests that gonads may have been functionally abnormal before they disappeared, and suggests that some patients have an intrinsic endocrine disorder.     

重组人生长激素治疗不同生长激素分泌状态青春前期矮身材患儿近期疗预测模型的建立和验证

目的 建立重组人生长激素(rhGH)治疗生长激素不同分泌状态青春前期矮身材患儿近期(1年)疗效的预测模型,并进行初步验证.方法回顾性分析62例生长激素不同分泌状态的青春前期矮身材患儿[模型组,分为全模型组(模型组全部病例)和生长激素缺乏症模型组(模型组中生长激素缺乏症的病例)]经rhGH治疗1年后的追赶性生长指标:生长速度(HV)和身高Z分增值(ΔHtSDS).根据单因素相关分析的结果,通过多元回归的方法,分别建立对HV和ΔHtSDS的2个预测方程(Model-GHD和Model-total).前瞻性分析另14例(验证组),将资料代入前述方程进行验证.结果单因素相关分析显示,与HV和ΔHtSDS显著(负)相关的是同一组影响因素.所得4个预测方程,R2在0.244～0.519,P值均＜0.05.HV的2个预测方程和对生长激素缺乏症患儿1ΔHtSDS的预测方程(实测值和预测值呈显著正相关,r在0.753～0.996;配对t检验示两者差异无统计学意义).结论预测模型建立成功,有助于预测不同生长激素分泌状态青春期矮身材患儿的生长激素的近期疗效.     

Growth hormone deficiency in HIV-infected children following successful treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy

Growth failure is common in children with untreated HIV, although growth hormone (GH) deficiency is rare. Treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy usually results in resumption of normal growth. We report the cases of 2 children with growth failure despite stable full suppression of viremia who were found to be GH deficient.     

特发性矮小患儿生长激素受体基因Ex3多态性与重组人生长激素疗效分析

目的：观察生长激素受体（GHR）基因Ex3多态性与重组人生长激素（rhGH）治疗青春期前特发性矮小（ISS）疗效间的相关性。方法：青春期前ISS患儿30例,均采用rhGH［0.116±0.02 IU/(kg/d)］治疗;其外周血白细胞中抽提基因组DNA,采用多重PCR扩增GHR基因Ex3区域。对不同基因型患儿治疗后生长速率（GV）、年龄对应身高标准差积分（HtSDSCA）及骨龄对应身高标准差积分（HtSDSBA）、预测终身高进行比较。结果：rhGH治疗半年后d3/d3基因型组GV较fl/fl基因型组明显增加［（6.3±1.6）cm/年 vs （3.4±0.5）cm/年,P<0.05］。结论：ISS患儿GHR Ex3基因型与rhGH促生长疗效存在一定关联,d3/d3等位基因型患儿用rhGH治疗后生长速率明显优于fl/fl等位基因型。［中国当代儿科杂志,2010,12（9）：730-733］     

Characteristics of children with idiopathic short stature in the Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study, and their response to growth hormone treatment

The auxological characteristics and the response to growth hormone (GH) treatment of children with idiopathic short stature were studied, using the database of the Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study. Pretreatment data from a total of 271 children were analysed. The children were selected for a birth weight above -2 SDS. The correlation coefficient of birth weight SDS and birth length SDS was 0.51, compared with 0.72 for the reference population. Median length at birth was -0.6 SDS, which fell to -2.5 SDS by 3 years of age. Thereafter, there was no further loss in height SDS. The response to GH treatment was studied in 222 of these prepubertal children who were given six or seven injectiodweek over a 3-year period. During this time, the median height SDS increased from -2.5 to -1.5, with those children receiving more than 0.65 IU/kg/week having a greater gain in height SDS than those on 0.5 IU/kg/week or less. The degree of bone age delay did not appear to influence the response to GH therapy.     

Growth hormone (GH) profiles in response to continuous subcutaneous infusion of GH-releasing hormone(1— 29)-NH2 in children with GH deficiency

Six children presenting with partial growth hormone (GH) deficiency (mean GH peak in two different tests, 8.0 k1.3 μ g/l ) aged 8–10.3 years (mean, 2.7 ± 0.9 years) were treated for 6 months by continuous subcutaneous infusion of GH-releasing hormone(1–29)-NH, (GHRH(1–29)-NH₂); 24-hour GH profiles and height velocity were measured. A biphasic effect of GHRH(1–29)-NH₂ infusion was observed. After an early substantial increase in the 24-hour integrated concentration of GH, from 1.6 ± 0.1 to 3.5 ± 0.7 μg/l/minute, a subsequent consistent decrease occurred by 3 months, which was more pronounced after 6 months (mean 24-hour integrated concentration of GH, 1.9± 0.9 μg/l/minute). This effect reflects modification of both pulse amplitude and frequency of GH secretion. At the end of the study, one child had complete suppression of GH secretion and two others showed only one peak above 5 μg/1 during a 24-hour period. No correlation was found between these changes and height velocity. Three children did not grow significantly; the other three children who had a growth response to GHRH(1–29)-NH₂ were those with the lowest 24-hour integrated GH concentration at the end of the study. The possible mechanisms involved in this biphasic effect, including GHRH antibodies, changes in somatostatin levels and/or desensitization of pituitary GHRH receptors, have been investigated.     

Effect of growth hormone therapy on height in children with idiopathic short stature: a meta-analysis

CONTEXT: Use of growth hormone (GH) therapy to promote growth in children with idiopathic short stature is controversial. A fundamental issue underlying the controversy is uncertainty about the magnitude of effectiveness of GH for this condition. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of GH on short- and long-term growth in idiopathic short stature. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of controlled and uncontrolled studies. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1985-2000), key journals, cross-referencing of bibliographies, abstract booklets, and experts. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: We performed a meta-analysis of all studies satisfying the inclusion criteria for idiopathic short stature: initial height below the 10th percentile, normal stimulated GH levels (>10 microg/L), absence of comorbid conditions, no previous GH therapy, treatment with biosynthetic GH, and inclusion of major outcome measures. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Growth velocity and height SD score (number of SDs from mean height for age and sex) at baseline and after 1 year to evaluate the short-term effect of GH. Adult height was analyzed to evaluate the long-term effect of GH. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ten controlled trials (434 patients) and 28 uncontrolled trials (655 patients) met the inclusion criteria. While baseline growth velocities were equivalent at baseline, 1-year growth velocity of the GH-treated group significantly exceeded that of controls by 2.86 cm/y. Similarly, in uncontrolled trials, growth velocity increased after 1 year, and height SD score increased from -2.72 at baseline to -2.19. In controlled studies, the adult height of the GH-treated group significantly exceeded controls by 0.84 SD, and in uncontrolled trials the adult height attained after GH treatment (-1.62 SDs) exceeded that predicted at baseline (-2.18 SDs). These results suggest an average gain in adult height of approximately 4 to 6 cm (range, 2.3-8.7 cm) with GH therapy. Given current treatment costs, this corresponds to more than $35 000 per inch (2.54 cm) gained in adult height in idiopathic short stature. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with GH results in short-term increases in growth for children with idiopathic short stature, and long-term GH can increase adult height. These results are fundamental to decisions about GH use and raise questions about the goals of treatment. Use of GH for idiopathic short stature in clinical practice will depend on its efficacy in promoting growth and the value of this effect to families, physicians, and third-party payers.     

Growth hormone treatment in children with familial dysautonomia

OBJECTIVE: To assess experience with growth hormone (GH) therapy in patients with familial dysautonomia (FD).Study design Of 580 patients with FD registered at the Dysautonomia Center at New York University Medical Center, 13 patients (8 males, 5 females) aged 1.10 to 15.10 years received GH treatment. GH doses ranged from 0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg/wk; one patient received 0.14 mg/kg/wk. Information regarding auxologic data, skeletal age, pubertal status, and spinal deformity before and after GH therapy was obtained from center records and treating endocrinologists. Growth velocity was analyzed before and during GH treatment at 0 to 6 months, 6 to 12 months, 1 to 2 years, and >2 years. RESULTS: Before GH therapy, growth velocity was <5 cm/y in 10 patients and 5 to 6 cm/y in three patients. In the first six months of GH therapy, growth velocity exceeded pretreatment rates in all but one patient; 10 patients achieved an annualized growth rate >7 cm/y. Six of nine patients treated for more than one year grew >5 cm/y. Less than optimal treatment responses were attributed to poor compliance, intercurrent illness, scoliosis, or advanced puberty. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that GH treatment in patients with FD may increase growth velocity, at least in the short term. This experiential data supports a future prospective study.     

Effects of growth hormone therapy in prepubertal children with short stature secondary to intrauterine growth retardation

A total of 130 short children were included in a French multicentre study and randomized between a control group (group A) and two groups treated with daily subcutaneous injections of GH at doses of 0.7 IU/kg/week (group B) and 1.4 IU/kg/week (group C) for 2 years. Height velocity was significantly increased ( p <0.0005) in groups B and C, with a greater increase in group C than in group B ( p < 0.001). The benefit after 2 years compared with controls was 4.3 cm in group B and 5.9 cm in group C. The rate of bone maturation was not affected by GH therapy. These results led to the conclusion that 2 years of treatment with GH improves final height prognosis in children with short stature secondary to IUGR, and that this effect is dose dependent. The effect on final height has still to be demonstrated.