Cardiac Valve Prostheses: Pathological and Bioengineering Considerations

Cardiac valve replacement with mechanical prosthetic or bioprosthetic devices enhances patient survival and quality of life. Nevertheless, prosthesis-associated complications are frequent and contribute significantly to outcome. Thrombo-embolic complications are the most important problems in patients with mechanical valves, necessitating chronic anticoagulation in all patients receiving them. In contrast, patients with bioprosthetic valves, composed of chemically treated animal tissues, generally do not require anticoagulants. However, bioprostheses fail frequently by degeneration, especially that involving cuspal calcification. This paper reviews the pathological and bioengineering considerations in the selection of cardiac prosthetic valves and the management of patients who have received these devices. The significance, morphology, and pathogenesis of the observed major complications and other alterations during function are described in detail. Contemporary investigative trends are summarized, including studies of inhibition of mineralization and other degenerative changes in bioprostheses, improved design rigid mechanical valves with pyrolytic carbon occluders and the development of central-flow, flexible polymeric leaflet valves.     

Do heart valve bioprostheses degenerate for metabolic or mechanical reasons?

Although heart valve bioprostheses provide a normal quality of life, their durability is still of great concern. Their durability failure is defined as "degeneration," which is considered to be a consequence of metabolic factors. In this study, we demonstrate that mechanical and design factors can also be responsible for bioprosthesis failure. Large numbers of porcine and pericardial bioprostheses were tested in a fatigue-testing system in which the test conditions were proved to be reproducible and accurate by a laser Doppler anemometer. The results have allowed us to define causes of failure, previously insufficiently stressed, in each type of valve tested. There is a clear difference in factors influencing tissue disruption between porcine and pericardial valves. We have compared these in vitro results with in vivo clinical findings. The main inferences are as follows: (1) Bioprostheses rupture and fail in the same fashion in both in vitro and in vivo studies. (2) Mechanical and design factors are involved in tissue failure. (3) The in vitro/in vivo durability ratio is not 1:1. This ratio depends on the test conditions. (4) Pericardial valves fail because of damage during closure, whereas porcine valves are damaged during both opening and closing (mostly opening) because of design features. (5) Once one cusp fails and prolapses, the other cusps will fail in an accelerated fashion. (6) In vitro durability of 100 X 10(6) cycles can be considered excellent and is an achievable goal. (7) Variability is the key impediment to predicting the durability of bioprostheses. Valves can fail within 2 to 3 million cycles or can last more than 100 million cycles. Similarly, bioprostheses may require explantation within a few months or can last 10 to 13 years in patients. (8) Fatigue testing is an excellent and valuable tool to elucidate the mechanical factors responsible for this variability.     

Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve in middle-aged patients comparison with the St. Jude medical valve

Objective The objective of the present study was to compare long-term results of single aortic valve replacement (AVR) with mechanical (St. Jude Medical valves: standard) and biologic (the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial) prostheses. Method: Between 1995 and 2002, 95 patients who underwent single AVR with mechanical (n=46) or biologic (n=49) prostheses were enrolled in this study. The mean age at the operation was 54.0±9.6 years (range: 20 to 69 years) with the mechanical and 68.8±7.1 years (range: 44 to 85 years) with the biologic prosthesis. Results: The 9-year actuarial survival rate, which was calculated by taking perioperative mortality into account, was 90.3±4.6% for patients with mechanical valves and 87.6 ±4.8% for patients with bioprostheses, with no difference between the two groups (p=0.342). The 9-year freedom rate from thromboembolism, reoperation, endocarditis was 94.8+3.6%, 100% and 97.8 ±2.2% for patients with mechanical valves and 98.0 ±2.0%, 97.5 ±3.4% and 95.0 ±3.4% for those with bioprostheses, respectively. After 9 years, freedom from cardiac death averaged 97.8% in the group with mechanical valves compared with 95.3% in those with bioprostheses (p=0.541). Conclusion: We conclude that the mid-term durability of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position for the elderly is excellent. Nevertheless, the risk of tissue valve reoperation progressively increases with time, and a longer follow-up may be necessary to provide its value compared with the mechanical valves in a country like Japan with a high life expectancy. (Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 53:465-469)     

Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.

OBJECTIVES: Reoperation is a relatively common event in patients with prosthetic heart valves, but its actual occurrence can vary widely from one patient to another. With a focus on bioprosthetic valves, this study examines risk factors for reoperation in a large patient cohort. METHODS: Patients (N=3233) who underwent a total of 3633 operations for aortic (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) between 1970 and 2002 were prospectively followed (total 21,179 patient-years; mean 6.6+/-5.0 years; maximum 32.4 years). The incidence of prosthetic valve reoperation and the impact of patient- and valve-related variables were determined with actual and actuarial methods. RESULTS: Fifteen-year actual freedom from all-cause reoperation was 94.1% for aortic mechanical valves, 61.4% for aortic bioprosthetic valves, 94.8% for mitral mechanical valves, and 63.3% for mitral bioprosthetic valves. In both aortic and mitral positions, current bioprosthesis models had significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses (15-year reoperation odds-ratio 0.11+/-0.04; P<0.01 for aortic, and 0.42+/-0.14; P=0.009 for mitral). Current bioprostheses were significantly more durable in the aortic position than in the mitral position (14.3+/-6.8% more freedom from 15-year reoperation; (P=0.018)). Older age was protective, but smoking was an independent risk factor for reoperation after bioprosthetic AVR and MVR (hazard ratio for smoking 2.58 and 1.78, respectively). In patients with aortic bioprostheses, persistent left ventricular hypertrophy at follow-up and smaller prosthesis size predicted an increased incidence of reoperation, while this was not observed in patients with mitral bioprostheses. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate that current bioprostheses have significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses, reveal a detrimental impact for smoking after AVR and MVR, and indicate an increased reoperation risk in patients with a small aortic bioprosthesis or with persistent left ventricular hypertrophy after AVR.     

Transpecies heart valve transplant: advanced studies of a bioengineered xeno-autograft

Background. Tissue engineering approaches utilizing biomechanically suitable cell-conductive matrixes should extend xenograft heart valve performance, durability, and growth potential to an extent presently attained only by the pulmonary autograft. To test this hypothesis, we developed an acellular, unfixed porcine aortic valve-based construct. The performance of this valve has been evaluated in vitro under simulated aortic conditions, as a pulmonary valve replacement in sheep, and in aortic and pulmonary valve replacement in humans.

Methods. SynerGraft porcine heart valves (CryoLife Inc, Kennesaw, GA) were constructed from porcine noncoronary aortic valve cusp units consisting of aorta, noncoronary aortic leaflet, and attached anterior mitral leaflet (AML). After treatment to remove all histologically demonstrable leaflet cells and substantially reduce porcine cell-related immunoreactivity, three valve cusps were matched and sewn to form a symmetrical root utilizing the AML remnants as the inflow conduit. SynerGraft valves were evaluated by in vitro hydrodynamics, and by in vivo implants in the right ventricular outflow tract of weanling sheep for up to 336 days. Cryopreserved allograft valves served as control valves in both in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Valves were also implanted as aortic valve replacements in humans.

Results. In vitro pulsatile flow testing of the SynerGraft porcine valves demonstrated excellent valve function with large effective orifice areas and low gradients equivalent to a normal human aortic valve. Implants in sheep right ventricular outflow tracts showed stable leaflets with up to 80% of matrix recellularization with host fibroblasts and/or myofibroblasts, and with no leaflet calcification over 150 days, and minimal deposition at 336 days. Echocardiography studies showed normal hemodynamic performance during the implantation period. The human implants have proven functional for over 9 months.

Conclusions. A unique heart valve construct has been engineered to achieve the equivalent of an autograft. Short-term durability of these novel implants demonstrates for the first time the possibility of an engineered autograft.     

Porcine aortic valve bioprostheses: morphologic and functional considerations

Porcine aortic valve (PAV) xenografts are the most frequently used type of bioprosthetic (BP) valve for the replacement of damaged or diseased heart valves. Xenograft tissues are routinely crosslinked during manufacturing using low concentrations (i.e., less than 1%) of glutaraldehyde. Crosslinking of xenograft tissue reduces the antigenicity, the rate of in vivo enzymatic degradation, and results in the loss of cell viability. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the morphologic and functional properties of the native aortic valve and the effects of tissue harvesting, fixation, anticalcification treatments, and mounting on PAV structure and function. Although efforts have been undertaken to design bioprostheses having increased durability, primary tissue failure still limits the long-term performance of xenograft replacement heart valves.     

Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue valve degeneration

Bioprosthetic heart valves have been used as replacements for diseased heart valves for over 30 years. More than 50% of bioprosthetic valves fail within 15 years because of structural deterioration. The role of proteolytic degradation, with particular reference to the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in the degeneration of aortic bioprostheses, is appraised in this minireview. It is clear that both the intrinsic and host-derived proteolytic activities present in heart-valve bioprostheses may combine with mechanical stress to bring about valve failure.     

Experimental in vitro endothelialization of cardiac valve leaflets.

This study reports our results with vitro endothelialization of fresh nonpreserved homograft valve leaflets compared with mild alternatively preserved valves and valves treated by preservation procedures commonly used for commercially available tissue valves. In vitro lining of biological heart valves with cultured autologous endothelial cells might help prevent the detrimental effects of degeneration on valve durability. To investigate the growth characteristics of endothelial cells on valve bioprostheses, three different methods of storage and preservation were compared. After precoating with fibronectin and seeding of 4.4 x 10(4) endothelial cells/cm2 onto the different leaflet surfaces, primary adherence, growth kinetics, morphology, and maintenance of monolayer integrity were studied over a period of 10 days. On valve leaflet surfaces of group 1 (fresh nonpreserved homograft valve leaflets) and group 2 (mild alternatively preserved valves), endothelial cells grew to persistent monolayers between days 6 and 10. In contrast, endothelial cell proliferation with monolayer growth could not be achieved on the group 3 leaflets (preserved like commercially available biological valve prostheses). In that group, no viable endothelial cells could be found on the valve surfaces 2 days after seeding. These results demonstrate the theoretical feasibility of endothelializing biological heart valve leaflets in vitro if they are not preserved and stored according to commonly used procedures. Provided such an endothelium can withstand the mechanical forces after implantation in vivo, in vitro endothelialization might contribute either to the development of new biological heart valves for modern cardiac surgery or to the improvement of clinical results with homograft valve transplants.     

Thrombotic and bleeding complications of prosthetic heart valves

A review of articles published since 1979 indicates that thrombotic and bleeding complications account for about 50% of valve-related complications in patients with bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valves and for approximately 75% of the complications in patients with mechanical valves. Although compromised by lack of standard definitions and by variability in reporting and follow-up, the data suggest that the linearized rate of both thrombotic and bleeding complications in patients with aortic bioprostheses is approximately half that for aortic mechanical prostheses (2% versus 4%), but is approximately equal for both bioprostheses and mechanical valves in the mitral position (approximately 4%), and for mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valves in combination. However, linearized rates for fatal thrombotic and bleeding events are two to four times higher in patients with mechanical prostheses. The adequacy of warfarin anticoagulation is the most important factor affecting thrombotic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical valves and over shadows the dubious importance of other phenomena such as atrial fibrillation and left atrial thrombus. Short-term warfarin anticoagulation or the use of long-term platelet inhibitors, or both, do not appear to reduce the incidence of thrombotic complications in patients with aortic bioprostheses but increase bleeding. For mitral bioprostheses, the postoperative use of warfarin for three months or aspirin indefinitely is as effective in preventing thromboembolism as long-term warfarin. Acute prosthetic valve endocarditis is associated with a 13 to 40% incidence of thrombotic complications. Likewise, the recurrence rate of cerebral emboli is high (20-30%) in patients with prosthetic valves who are not anticoagulated. Bioprostheses are strongly preferred for women who wish to bear children; fetal wastage occurs in 25 to 30% of pregnant women with mechanical heart valves who receive either warfarin or heparin, or a combination of the two. Heparin, however, greatly increases the risk of maternal bleeding. In children, the efficacy of platelet inhibitors without warfarin anticoagulation is unproven; nearly all serious strokes occur when warfarin is omitted; and permanent disability from warfarin-related bleeding is rare. All prosthetic cardiac valves initiate coagulation and affect the dynamic equilibrium between activated procoagulants and endogenous anticoagulants. Warfarin is the only available oral exogenous anticoagulant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Stent and leaflet stresses in 26-mm,third-generation,balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve

Objectives

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has proven successful in treating intermediate-risk, high-risk, and inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. Third-generation, balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves were developed with an outer sealing skirt to reduce paravalvular leakage. As transcatheter aortic valve replacement use expands, long-term durability questions remain. Valve design influences durability, where regions of increased leaflet stress are vulnerable to early degeneration. However, third-generation transcatheter aortic valve stresses are unknown. Our goals were to determine the stent and leaflet stresses of third-generation, balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves.

Carbomedics® Valve in Congenital Heart Disease: Midterm follow-up study of 14 patients

In 14 patients aged 5–329 (mean 131) months a CarboMedics® valve was implanted because of congenital heart disease. The preoperative NYHA function class was III-IV in ten cases. Seven aortic and seven atrioventricular valves were replaced without early mortality. All patients were followed up, with mean observation time 27 months (total 384 months). One of the 14 patients died of heart failure 10 months postoperatively. Thrombosis occurred in four valves, three in tricuspid and one in mitral position. In all patients who received only warfarin, anticoagulation was demonstrably inadequate. Consequently we now recommend antiplatelet medication in addition to warfarin for children with atrioventricular mechanical valve replacement. In our experience the complication rate with CarboMedics prosthesis is acceptable, provided that anticoagulant therapy is adequate.     

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of lyophilized bioprosthetic valve

Freeze-drying of biological tissues allows for dry storage and gamma ray sterilization, which may improve their use as a medical prosthesis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rehydration characteristics and hydrodynamic performance of prosthetic valves before and after lyophilization. Two size 23 bovine pericardium aortic valve prostheses from different manufacturers were evaluated in a Shelhigh (Union, NJ, USA) pulse duplicator (80 ppm, 5 L/min) before and after lyophilization. Flow and transvalvular pressure gradient were registered in vitro and in vivo, and images of opening and closing of the prosthesis were obtained in the pulse duplicator in a digital camera. Rehydration was evaluated by comparison of dry valve weight with valve weight after 15 min, and 1, 24, 48, and 72 h in saline solution, inside the pulse duplicator. In vivo performance was assessed by surgical implantation in Santa Inês young male sheep in the pulmonary position after 30 min rehydration with 0.9% saline. Transvalvular pressure gradient and flow measurements were obtained immediately after implantation and 3 months after surgery when valves were explanted. Captured images showed a change in the profile opening and closing of valve prosthesis after lyophilization. The gradient measured (in vitro) in two valves was 17.08 ± 0.57 and 18.76 ± 0.70 mm Hg before lyophilization, and 34.24 ± 0.59 and 30.40 ± 0.97 mm Hg after lyophilization. Rehydration of both lyophilized valves was approximately 82%. Drying changed the profile of the opening and closing of valve prostheses, and increased on average by 83% the gradient in vitro tests. The result of the in vivo tests suggests maintaining pressure levels of the animal with the lyophilized prostheses within acceptable levels.     

Transapical aortic 'valve-in-valve' procedure for degenerated stented bioprosthesis

Standard surgical aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis remains the treatment of choice for low- and mid-risk elderly patients (traditionally >65 years of age) suffering from severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis or insufficiency, and for young patients with formal contraindications to long-lasting anticoagulation. Unfortunately, despite the fact that several technical improvements have noticeably improved the resistance of pericardial and bovine bioprostheses to leaflet calcifications and ruptures, the risk of early valve failure with rapid degeneration still exists, especially for patients under haemodialysis and for patients <60 years of age at the time of surgery. Until now, redo open heart surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass and on cardioplegic arrest was the only available therapeutic option in case of bioprosthesis degeneration, but it carried a higher surgical risk when elderly patients with severe concomitant comorbidities were concerned. Since a few years, the advent of new transcatheter aortic valve procedures has opened new horizons in cardiac surgery and, in particular, the possibility of implanting stented valves within the degenerated stented bioprosthesis, the so-called 'valve-in-valve' (VinV) concept, has become a clinical practice in experienced cardiac centres. The VinV procedure represents a minimally invasive approach dedicated to high-risk redo patients, and published preliminary reports have shown a success rate of 100% with absence of significant valvular leaks, acceptable transvalvular gradients and low complication rate. However, this procedure is not riskless and the most important concerns are about the size mismatch and the right positioning within the degenerated bioprosthesis. In this article, we review the limited available literature about VinV procedures, underline important technical details for the positioning and provide guidelines to prevent valve-prosthesis mismatch comparing the three sizes of the only commercially available transapical device, the Edwards Sapien, with the inner diameter of three of the most commonly used stented bioprostheses.     

Stentless porcine and pericardial valve in aortic position.

Fifty-seven patients underwent aortic valve replacement with a stentless glutaraldehyde-fixed bioprosthesis; 27 received a porcine aortic valve and 30 had a bovine pericardial valve. Two groups of 30 patients each who had aortic valve replacement with a tilting-disc mechanical valve or a stented porcine bioprosthesis served as controls. There were no differences in sex, body surface area, valve lesion, and valve size among the four groups. Results were assessed on a Doppler-based determination of maximum velocity across the valve, aortic valve area, and degree of valve regurgitation. Velocity across the valve was significantly less with stentless pericardial valves than with stentless porcine valves, stented bioprostheses, and mechanical valves. Stentless valves had a significantly larger aortic valve area when compared with stented valves. Mild central aortic insufficiency was detected more often with stentless pericardial than with stentless porcine bioprostheses (p = 0.04). Stentless valves showed a higher incidence of complete atrioventricular block when compared with stented valves (p = 0.04). Long-term studies are now warranted to assess the durability of both types of stentless valves.     

Age-related complications and optimal choice of artificial heart valves in elderly patients

The use of bioprosthetic heart valves in elderly patients is presently advocated by many since implanting mechanical valves are considered to result in unacceptable rates of thromboembolism and bleeding. However the somewhat limited durability of bioprostheses has to be acknowledged since a group of elderly patients will eventually require a reoperation due to tissue failure. We have evaluated our policy to implant mechanical heart valve prostheses even in elderly patients based on the conception that we believe that anticoagulation in this group of patients can be handled with a low rate of complications.     

Polyurethane: material for the next generation of heart valve prostheses?

OBJECTIVES: The prospects for a durable, athrombogenic, synthetic, flexible leaflet heart valve are enhanced by the recent availability of novel, biostable polyurethanes. As a forerunner to evaluation of such biostable valves, a prototype trileaflet polyurethane valve (utilising conventional material of known in vitro behaviour) was compared with mechanical and bioprosthetic valves for assessment of in vivo function, durability, thromboembolic potential and calcification. METHODS: Polyurethane (PU), ATS bileaflet mechanical, and Carpentier-Edwards porcine (CE) valves were implanted in the mitral position of growing sheep. Counting of high-intensity transient signals (HITS) in the carotid arteries, echocardiographic assessment of valve function, and examination of blood smears for platelet aggregates were undertaken during the 6-month anticoagulant-free survival period. Valve structure and hydrodynamic performance were assessed following elective sacrifice. RESULTS: Twenty-eight animals survived surgery (ten ATS; ten CE; eight PU). At 6 months the mechanical valve group (n=9) showed highest numbers of HITS (mean 40/h, P=0.01 cf. porcine valves), and platelet aggregates (mean 62.22/standard field), but no thromboembolism, and no structural or functional change. The bioprosthetic group (n=6) showed low HITS (1/h) and fewer aggregates (41.67, P=1.00, not significant), calcification and severe pannus overgrowth with progressive stenosis. The PU valves (n=8) showed a small degree of fibrin attachment to leaflet surfaces, no pannus overgrowth, little change in haemodynamic performance, low levels of HITS (5/h) and platelet aggregates (17.50, P<0.01 cf. mechanical valves, P=0.23 cf. porcine valves), and no evidence of thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of valve-related death and morbidity, and retention of good haemodynamic function, the PU valve was superior to the bioprosthesis; lower HITS and aggregate counts in the PU valve imply lower thrombogenicity compared with the mechanical valve. A biostable polyurethane valve could offer clinical advantage with the promise of improved durability (cf. bioprostheses) and low thrombogenicity (cf. mechanical valves).     

Prosthetic heart valve evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of velocity fields downstream of prosthetic aortic valves. Furthermore, to provide comparative data from bileaflet aortic valve prostheses in vitro and in patients. METHODS: A pulsatile flow loop was set up in a 7.0 Tesla MRI scanner to study fluid velocity data downstream of a 25 mm aortic bileaflet heart valve prosthesis. Three dimensional surface plots of velocity fields were displayed. In six NYHA class I patients blood velocity profiles were studied downstream of their St. Jude Medical aortic valves using a 1.5 Tesla MRI whole-body scanner. Blood velocity data were displayed as mentioned above. RESULTS: Fluid velocity profiles obtained from in vitro studies 0.25 valve diameter downstream of the valve exhibited significant details about the cross sectional distribution of fluid velocities. This distribution completely reflected the valve design. Blood velocity profiles in humans were considerably smoother and in some cases skewed with the highest velocities toward the anterior-right ascending aortic wall. CONCLUSION: Display and interpretation of fluid and blood velocity data obtained downstream of prosthetic valves is feasible both in vitro and in vivo using the MRI technique. An in vitro model with a straight tube and the test valve oriented orthogonally to the long axis of the test tube does not entail fluid velocity profiles which are compatible to those obtained from humans, probably due to the much more complex human geometry, and variable alignment of the valve with the ascending aorta. With the steadily improving quality of MRI scanners this technique has significant potential for comparative in vitro and in vivo hemodynamic evaluation of heart valves.     

Hydrodynamic function of the second-generation mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND: The hydrodynamic function of the smaller size Mitroflow Synergy stented pericardial bioprostheses has been studied in an in vitro fresh tissue aortic root model and compared with previous studies of free-sewn bioprostheses. METHODS: Three valves of each of the sizes 19, 21, and 23 mm were sutured into fresh tissue aortic roots and tested in a pulsatile flow simulator using two different ventricular input impedance conditions. A high-speed camera was used to study the leaflet opening and closing configurations. Mean pressure difference as a function of root mean square forward flow, effective orifice area, regurgitant volumes, and total energy loss across the valves was measured. RESULTS: Mean pressure difference with respect to root mean square forward flow decreased as the valve size increased. Thus effective orifice area increased as the valve size increased. The open leaflet configuration images showed that all three sizes of Mitroflow valves had a large circular orifice with minimal open leaflet deformation. All valves closed competently with no visible leakage and no closed regurgitant volume. The Mitroflow valves showed better effective orifice areas compared with previously tested frame-mounted porcine bioprostheses but lower effective orifice areas compared with porcine stentless bioprostheses; however, the open leaflet bending deformation was better than for any of the previously tested bioprosthetic valves. CONCLUSIONS: The hydrodynamic function of the Mitroflow Synergy stented pericardial bioprosthesis shows potential for good in vivo hemodynamic performance. The good hemodynamic performance combined with relative ease of implantation technique makes the pericardial valve a good valve in the aortic position, particularly in older patients with small annuli.     

Clinical use of stentless aortic valves with standard and minimally invasive surgical techniques

The stentless porcine aortic valve prostheses have the potential to provide superior hemodynamic function and durability. Our institution was a trial site for the investigational device exemption (IDE) for 2 of the 3 stentless valve bioprostheses and has clinical experience in all 3 valves that are soon to be available. From July 1996 to January 2001, we have implanted 213 porcine stentless valves: the Toronto SPV (159), the Freestyle (20), and the Prima Plus (34) (current IDE). Fifty-five percent of these patients had concomitant coronary artery bypass graft procedures, 44% had isolated aortic valve replacements, and 3 patients required aortic valve and mitral valve procedures. Fifty-nine percent of the patients were men, 9% of procedures were reoperations, and 22% of patients were in New York Heart Association classification III or IV preoperatively. Extubation occurred within 5 hours for 52% of patients, median cardiothoracic intensive care unit length of stay was 1 day, and postoperative length of stay was 6 days. Reoperations for bleeding occurred in 5.3% of patients (0 in the past 12 months), atrial fibrillation in 28.2%, and permanent neurologic deficit in 1.9%. No patients required valve-related reoperations or had either sepsis or sternal infections. Operative mortality was 1.4%. We have also analyzed a subset of patients who had minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus the standard approach and found no important differences in mortality (none), postoperative complications, cardiopulmonary bypass, or cross-clamp times. There was a trend towards earlier ambulation, less atrial fibrillation (15.8% v 24.1%), and earlier hospital discharge (5.6 days v 7.2 days). We conclude that excellent results were obtained with all 3 stentless aortic valve bioprostheses. Hospital events should be predictably low in elderly patients and those requiring concomitant procedures. Stentless aortic valve bioprostheses can be incorporated into regular cardiac surgical practice with the techniques described.     

Stentless bioprostheses in aortic root disease

INTRODUCTION: The availability of aortic homografts is steadily decreasing. In the meantime, stentless xenografts convey similar flow characteristics, and tissue preservation methods are improving durability. Initially, these valves were contraindicated in aortic roots with discrepancy between annulus and sinotubular junction or with extensive calcification or sepsis. With increasing experience stentless xenografts are now applied in a wide spectrum of aortic root disease. METHODS: I reviewed our own experience with stentless aortic bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR) and more taxing root problems. I used these valves in aortic aneurysm repair, acute Type A dissection, and for endocarditis with abcess formation. I studied valve hemodynamics, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, and comparative survival with stented bioprostheses. RESULTS: Stentless bioprostheses convey hemodynamic and possibly survival benefit through a low incidence of valve-related complications. They provide a useful alternative to aortic homografts in endocarditis, Type A dissection, and aortic aneurysm surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Stentless bioprostheses are no longer confined to AVR alone. Experience supports the use of stentless bioprostheses where aortic homografts were previously applied. With availability in a wide range of sizes.